Monday, November 30, 2015
That's the crap the pro-abortionists keep feeding us about killing infants, and it's bogus. If it were true, they'd legalize prostitution, which is another case of a woman's right to choose what is done with her body. But prostitution remains illegal. What it actually is, is an infant's right to live, and not be MURDERED by fools who think murdering babies is okay. But nobody's listening. The fools have people convinced that even TALKING about infanticide is, somehow, indicative of a mental aberration. Socialist Bernie Sanders, the Democrat who is trying to unseat Hillary in her drive for the presidency, is all FOR killing babies. It makes me physically ILL to hear people like Bernie talk about his support for Planned Parenthood and their daily MURDERS of innocent babies. Whenever I hear it I puke. Just as I puke when I hear Obama trying to “smooth over” Islamic terrorists killing people who aren't their kind of Muslims. (Bustle)
OBAMA OPTS FOR DISASTER: He rejected the Keystone Pipeline to bring oil through the United States cleanly and safely, saying, “The Keystone Pipeline is not in our interest.” How damned fool is THAT? Now Canada will have to ship its oil by rail and by truck, with all the attendant dangers inherent. Watch for all the semi accidents and train derailments, with their inherent spillages of oil. Obama will, of course, deny his refusal of the Keystone Pipeline is responsible for each and every one. He'll find something else to blame it on. Probably the policies of George Bush. He blames all his other blunders on Bush, so why not this one, too? (Town Hall)
Liberals like to tell us all the time about the “peaceful; Muslims who are coming here to live. Yeah. Peaceful. Why then, are “honor killings” on the rise? Why do Muslims KILL so many beautiful women for GETTING raped, or being seen with someone on the street not her relative, either natural, or by “marriage?” Why are there so many reports of Muslims killing people for the smallest “slights?”
Why do Muslims take truck driving jobs where they KNOW they will be hauling alcoholic beverages, then refuse to do so, and sue the employers for firing them when they refuse, and collecting six figure “settlements?” Why do they seem to sue just about anybody, for just about anything they think they can use to disrupt things? Why have they set up “phone trees” to allow them to quickly form a crowd of Muslims to beat the hell out of any non-Muslim coming into their “enclaves?” They don't come here to escape anything.
They bring it with them. They come here in droves, breed like rabbits, and are only waiting until they outnumber us and can elect their own candidates (if they haven't elected a president, already) and vote Muslim things into law here. Why are our military people told to IGNORE the sounds of Muslim officers raping little boys and chaining them to beds to keep them as sex slaves in Afghanistan and Iraq? That it's a (cultural thing” with them, so child rape is okay?) Next the same thing will be enforced in America. And the young boys they seem to favor will suffer. They call us “corrupt” and they do things like that. And their lust for children is not limited to boys. They are well known to “marry” little girls, sometimes as young as SIX. (Town Hall)
Sunday, November 29, 2015
Whenever you hear somebody spouting this term, RUN in the opposite direction. Don't listen to them because they're selling COLLECTIVISM, of which socialism and communism are but two different cousins. Fascism is another. They're all based on this simple motto: “FROM each according to his ABILITY, and TO each according to his NEED.” Making NEED a demand upon the earnings of anybody who is industrious enough to PRODUCE new wealth, and keep some of it for himself, for the benefit of those who DON'T, or will not. IT is a philosophy of THEFT from the PRODUCER to give that earned by him/her, UNEARNED, to the MOOCHER. And the government is the LOOTER who steals it, in the form of taxes, to support all forms of WELFARE. One of the best known terms lately is “income inequality.” Those who earn less than others are the lazy. The ones who won't, or CAN'T earn enough. So they want to “take it away from those who do” to GIVE to those who don't Those who won't produce are not entitled to earn as much as those who PRODUCE all the new wealth. But liberals are determined to TAKE money and property away from them and GIVE it to those who DON'T. (Town Hall)
The government does many things to make more and more people (who each have a vote) dependent on them for their very survival. One of those things is “public housing.” There are more and more public housing projects going up every day. And each person who lives there is, by definition, dependent on government for their low rents. So now they're talking about banning smoking in public housing. I'm sure they have already banned ownership of guns in public housing, The people who live there can't move if they don't like it. They can't afford to live anywhere else. And they still feel like they have to vote Democrat, so the low rents will continue, with the Democrats telling them, every day, how the Republicans are going to do away with public housing and all the other “freebies” they give them. (Town Hall)
Hillary Clinton has lauded Australia, where semi-automatic handguns are BANNED, as a “country with reasonable, good sense gun laws.”But ARE they “good sense” or “reasonable?” a recent SPIKE in gun sales there to CRIMINALS (misreported by their “yellow journalism” media) seems to put the LIE to that. It is well known that violent crime INCREASED by about 300% after they BANNED semi-automatic handguns after a well-known slaughter. One of the reasons for the increase in “gun crime” is that the very POSSESSION of certain guns is, itself, a “gun crime.” Another reason is that the semi-automatic gun is the favorite weapon of the “criminal class.” Crime, generally, is GOING DOWN in many areas of America where “wiser heads” have made laws making it easier for honest, law-abiding people to own and carry their guns for self-defense. But people like Hillary think that's a “bad thing,” despite the reduction in crime because of it, which they deny. (Cogito Ergo Geek)
Saturday, November 28, 2015
I know Obama wants desperately to close Guantanamo That prison for Islamic terrorists he can't call “prisoners of war” because he maintains this is NOT a war. So he releases them, a few at a time, so they can go back and swell the ranks of Jihadists in killing “unbelievers,” world-wide.” There is not real reason for releasing these bloody murderers except Obama's whims. Most all there ARE murderers, many times over. They were mostly “caught in the act” of murdering civilians, beheading them, raping and killing CHILDREN and adults. Liberals say keeping them prisoner is 'unconstitutional,” but that's WRONG. These people are NOT American citizens, and don't HAVE any”constitutional rights. It is only because Obama refuses to face up to the fact that we are AT WAR with Islamic terrorists that they are not listed as “prisoners of war,” period. If he doesn't want to hold them prisoner any more, just kill them for their crimes. (NewsMax)
Obama went on the “Morning Joe” program and tried to take credit for New Jersey's reduction in crime by 20%, and reduction in prison population by 10%. He said, “Obama had NOTHING to do with it!” It's a typical example of Obama's attempts to take credit for anything GOOD, while blaming anything bad on Bush. Obama will probably call Christie a liar. That's what he does when anybody reveals his own LIES. But he can't ignore the obvious. The obvious is that Obama does NOT support law enforcement. He has made that plain in his statements in FAVOR of the current effort to discredit law enforcement by his criminal friends, while becoming the best-known lawbreaker, himself. Christie says cops are afraid to get out of their cars because their politicians do not support them. In that' he's partially wrong. They still come out of their cars, but now with their guns already drawn, ready to shoot. Obama is creating a “self-fulfilling prophecy” with regard to how quick the cops shoot. (Conservative Newsroom)
The national Postal Union has endorsed SOCIALIST Bernie Sanders, in a demonstration of their complete stupidity. ANYBODY who likes Bernie is as “crazy as a bedbug.” What he wants to do is to take away ALL our money and property and have the government tell you everything you can or cannot do. That's what socialism is: Their MOTTO is, “FROM each according to his ABILITY, and TO each according to his NEED,” Making NEED a demand upon the EARNINGS of those capable and willing to work and support themselves. It's a system of THEFT from the PRODUCERS of new wealth to the benefit of the moochers. hose who can't or WON'T produce. Anybody who WANTS this is either stupid, or JEALOUS of those who CAN produce, and want some of it, UNEARNED. The Postal Union is as near a governmental organization as it can get without BEING one, so their endorsement means NOTHING. (Town Hall)
Friday, November 27, 2015
If they won't? How many (count 'em) Muslim-run states in the Persian Gulf area have accepted NO “Syrian refugees?” Yet they make a lot of noise about how “racist” and “unfeeling” we are if we don't accept thousands of “refugees” that include very few women or children, and are made up of mostly young, healthy, fighting age MEN? If Muslim states won't take them, why the hell should we? We're damned FOOLS to do so, allowing thousands of possible Muslim extremists into our country, with permission, to set up their cells and later kill as many Americans as they can? This “invasion” of Muslims into our country is the biggest “Trojan Horse” operation there ever has been. And if we continue to allow it, they're going to overrun us. But Obama doesn't care. That's what he wants. (Daily Caller)
Pretty soon ISIS is going to “bite off more than they can chew.” After the success they've experienced because nobody is REALLY opposing them in Iraq or Afghanistan due to Obama's STUPIDITY in pulling his troops out without winning, they're beginning to think they're “invincible,” and can whip ANYBODY. They've been promising to “take on” the United States (eventually), and now they're promising to attack RUSSIA too, and SOON. Russia is KNOWN for CRUSHING terrorists when they attack them. Better terrorists than ISIS. So go on, ISIS, attack Russia and everybody else at the same time. And suffer the consequences. Frankly, I think they already HAVE “attacked Russia” by “downing” that Russian airplane. Good luck, ISIS, when the retaliation comes. They don't care about “collateral damage” like we do, as long as YOU die. And they're very good at killing. Never mind you beat Russia before. They weren't really trying. You were just a “piffle” to them then. Now they want a piece of your a....butt. (Town Hall)
There is a real bunch of DELUDED people out there right now, making a lot of noise about NOTHING. What little there is of it is in RETALIATION for their actions. Racism (the old kind) is NOT “rampant” in the country today, as they allege. The only kind of racism that is rampaging now is black hating whites. The other day a college professor “verbally assaulted” a black press photographer who was doing his job, photographing their “demonstration” to “point out” the racism that does exist. At the same time, one other professor didn't cancel a test because of the “demonstration and got so much flack she almost resigned. Yes, there IS racism out there, and it IS “rampant.” But it's NOT the kind of racism they allege.
It is a NEW kind of racism with blacks hating whites and “whipping up” opinion against whites, who are doing little or NOTHING to blacks. The old kind of racism was almost completely gone until they started claiming it was “getting worse,” and that cops were “killing blacks” at an unprecedented rate. Only one thing wrong with that. Cops AREN'T “killing blacks for no reason.” 95% of cases of white cops killing blacks did it during a lawful arrest, usually when the blacks were trying to kill the cop. The killing of that “gentle giant” in Ferguson, MO (whose phony promotion started it all) is a case in point. His accomplices LIED, and said he had his hands up, saying, “don't shoot” when he was actually trying his best to kill that cop. As big as that fool was, he didn't NEED to be armed.
In Baltimore, MD, six unfortunate cops are indicted in the self-inflicted death of a criminal, who hit his head against the wall of the “wagon,” trying to incriminate the cops, too soon after his back surgery. All of which promoted the PHONY idea that the cops were at fault. Liberals cry about the number of blacks in prison, discounting the FACT that blacks commit more crimes than whites. Meanwhile, Obama cries “racism” every time ANYBODY opposes his fool ideas. Racism is being promoted in order to get more blacks to vote Democrat, and keep the White House in Democrat hands. Illegal alien protection too, for the same reason. (Town Hall)
Thursday, November 26, 2015
As long as it is done by a criminal while in the commission of another crime, such as murder of the mother. Forget the fact that Planned Parenthood murders babies every day. That makes it “legal, according to liberal politicians. I've always maintained that ABORTION is, itself, a crime. The crime of MURDER of a helpless infant before he/she even gets a chance at life. I guess it's murder or not, depending on how the politicians look at the case where an unborn child got murdered. In Indianapolis, three men, who called themselves, “The Kill Gang,” murdered a pregnant pastor's wife after hiding and waiting for her husband to leave for work. All have been apprehended, after one of them shot her and watched her bleed almost to death. But apparently, they became bored, and left. She, and her baby died the next day. Notice that all three are black. If cops had caught them and maybe killed one of them, liberals would have gone bananas, while their parents would have criticized the cops for killing one or more of them. That's how it is, today. No longer can they be called “The Kill Gang.” They will henceforth be called “prisoners” waiting (I hope) for their death penalties to be carried out. What goes unsaid here is what she could have done if she had had her own gun. Maybe one or more of the THUGS (that's right, I called them THUGS!) could have been killed, (Fox 2)
I just wrote about a wrong premise fueling the anti-gun fools' actions, and now here is another. Ayn Rand, the Objectivist philosopher, said, “If you see a contradiction, check your premises,” The contradiction in the linked story is that Americans don't have the right to express their religious beliefs in a public place, because of the Constitution. That involves a purposeful MISREADING of the clause in the Constitution. The Constitution merely states, “The Congress shall make NO LAW regarding the ESTABLISHMENT of religion, or prohibiting the free expression thereof.” NO LAW! The City council did both in banning this cross from a cemetery and were defeated in the next election because of it. You don't want to mess with Iowans. This situation highlights the way politicians MISREAD the Constitution in many ways, making unconstitutional laws—until they're “called to account.” Unfortunately, by then, the damage has already been done. They do it in their basic premise on gun control, that a LAW will make a CRIMINAL, who obeys NO laws, refrain from using his gun to victimize people. (Freedom Outpost)
The appeals court ruled that Obama's plan to ignore the Constitution is unconstitutional. Wonder of wonders! And the Associated Press equated Obama's plan to “denying 5 million people the “right” to stay here,” when they CAME here ILLEGALLY. Forget his plan is a blatant violation of the law. Forget it's just one more time Obama ignores the Constitution, which he SWORE to uphold and defend, Too bad the Founders didn't specify a PENALTY for a politician to ignore the Constitution. Obama would be in prison on many counts. Maybe for the rest of his miserable life. (Twitchy)
Wednesday, November 25, 2015
They are being shown every day that Trump is not only strong enough to win the Republican nomination, but to make mincemeat out of Hillary in the general election, and that is not good for them. He has demonstrated that he is going to “upset many of their applecarts” and end many of their little “fiefdoms,” and they can't have that.. So now they've tried to attack his very candidacy, saying he failed to PROVE her was, in fact, a Republican. They think they've got him since he signed that pledge to support the winner if he lost. But that didn't include if he lost due to underhanded dealings and chicanery, so he is now making rumblings about an independent campaign—and they know he is one who could win as an independent, making the Republicans go the way of the Whigs. They'd better “wise up” and get on the bandwagon, or he'll leave them in the dust and win the whole shebang without them. (World Net Daily)
Hillary, in one of her endless speeches, screamed out, “It was Republican bad policy!” This, from a woman who is the front-runner for politicians who are KNOWN for bad policy and INCOMPETENCE. She talks about “fiscal mismanagement” when the current president has spent more money than there IS. More than all previous presidents, COMBINED! He has gotten us almost $20 TRILLION dollars in debt, making us a “debtor nation” in serious debt to communist China, which HATES us. Democrats are KNOWN for spending more of our money than they take in. And they take up the chant about a GOP presidential candidate who has had to pay some “late fees” on his credit card (like many Americans)! These people are not only incompetent, they're STUPIDLY so. And they're too stupid to realize their incompetence. (Just common sense)
Many things Obama has done in the last seven years are absurd. But closing GITMO while Muslim terrorists are still killing Americans (and other innocent people) all over the world is the most absurd. Moving these “stone killers” into the United States is going to mean the deaths of a lot of people, beginning with their fellow prisoners, as easy as it is to anger them and make them want to kill anybody in range, not caring abut the consequences. That doesn't disturb me as much as the killings they will do when they escape, as some of them WILL do. They're ruthless killers, not used to having to curb their killer instincts. And the way Obama is releasing them for any reason, or no reason at all, I worry that their penchant for screwing CHILDREN (it's a “cultural thing,” with them) will make a more dangerous world for little boys or little girls. Obama seems unable, or unwilling to punish Muslims for ANYTHING. Now, THAT worries me. If he doesn't “wise up” and realize they're deadly ENEMIES, and deal with them as such, we will lose to them. Not because they're so good, but because Obama is NOT so good. He's pretty LOUSY, in fact. (Mail News)
Tuesday, November 24, 2015
Obama spent about an hour on television this morning, telling the world of his “sorrow” over the downing of a Russian airplane over Turkey. He did it as part of his “after meeting” press conference after he met with the President of France to talk about the atrocities committed in Paris by Islamic terrorists (some of whom were also Syrian ”refugees”). Seems like he's been doing a lot of that lately, but little else. Yes, his people did do a little bombing and a few drone strikes, such as the one that is supposed to have killed “Jihadi John," who murdered so many people by beheading them in front of TV cameras, while ignoring a major ISIS headquarters building just FEET away. Seems like everything he does to “fight terrorists” (whom he will not NAME as “Islamic,”) is designed to do them as little damage as possible. They ARE his friends, after all. (CNN)
He says the American people LIKE Obamacare, when they actually HATE it with a passion. How could they NOT hate it when it DOUBLES their premiums, at the very least, for the SAME coverage, and deductibles in the THOUSANDS of dollars makes it useless? You have to pay THOUSANDS of dollars for medical care BEFORE your doubled-cost insurance kicks in. His abortion has so screwed up the medical profession that we are losing existing doctors at an alarming rate, while applications to medical schools have significantly reduced. What's there to LIKE? Yet Obama is convinced that America likes his abortion. Does he really BELIEVE that? Or is he just trying to make US believe it? Does he really think we are STUPID enough to believe it? If he is, he's more incompetent than I thought. (Minuteman News)
At a Seattle (where else?) public university, some have expressed their “discomfort” at saying the “Pledge of Allegiance” during a church service and that university BANNED it on their sayso. Then they rescinded the ban, pretending it didn't happen. How stupid ARE these people? Reciting the Pledge is appropriate anywhere, any time. For AMERICANS. Only misguided fools with NO “allegiance” would be “uncomfortable” reciting it. If they're NOT in allegiance to the country which has, so far, kept them free to HAVE such objections, they have no business even LIVING in America. This country and it's laws have ALLOWED them to do such stupid things without the GOVERNMENT “coming down on them,” and they should appreciate that. But they obviously don't. (Minuteman News)
Monday, November 23, 2015
Some of today's “school officials” have absolutely NO common sense. This case proves it, as have many others recently. In it, the school principal has threatened a 9 YEAR OLD with “sexual harassment” charges if he writes another :love note: to the object of his first crush. A 9 YEAR OLD! Who doesn't even know what sex IS, yet! And this liberal fool wants to saddle him with ADULT charges! What kind of a damned FOOL is this principal? He/she needs to attend a “harassment” class to learn what harassment really is! We need to “clean out” such fools from school “officialdom,” before they seriously injure the minds of the impressionable children, a large part of whose lives they run. (Survival Joe)
Everything Democrats do reflects their STUPIDITY. They want to stop even OFF-DUTY COPS from being able to carry “assault weapons.” Never mind they might come on a violent crime being committed at any time, on duty or not, or be forced to defend themselves against vengeful crooks they sent to prison. Gays want to destroy the WORD “marriage” to get all the RIGHTS of married people when all they have to do is create a contract between them SIMILAR to marriage. But they won't accept that. They want the WORD. And Democrats are right with them. Democrats like Bernie Sanders for president, regardless of the fact he is a SOCIALIST, which is absolutely WRONG for America, or any other country. It is a system of THEFT from the PRODUCER of new wealth for the benefit of those who can't, or WON'T create new wealth. Hillary is just as much a socialist, even if she denies it. Her WORDS confirm it. They criticize the rich for BEING rich, when it is the rich who keep this economy GOING. Without the rich, there wouldn't be anything for the Democrats to steal, and call “income redistribution.” Politicians don't “create jobs.” The RICH do. They don't realize that. They think the rich STOLE their riches from the poor. How do you steal something they don't HAVE from the poor? Everything bad we experience is because of the influence of liberals (Democrats), and when they're in the majority, they mess things up, royally. (Just common sense)
I can't say if the manure comes from a horse or a bull, but it's manure, in any case. Joe Scarboro is “doubling down” on the Democrat's feeble attempt to discredit Dr. Carson over the meaning of what he said fifty years ago about being “offered a West Point 'scholarship',” which does not exist. What Scarboro doesn't accept (in his “superior knowledge,” of course) is the fact that Carson, as pretty much a boy at the time could have misconstrued the general's offer to BE a “scholarship (and DID).” As to if he DID go to West Point, he didn't. And he never said he did. Go back and read the book to verify that. He wanted to be a doctor, and has obviously attained that goal, which the years of attendance necessary to attend West Point would have made impossible in the time frame. It's an OBVIOUS attempt by the Democrats to besmirch a good man. They can't find anything REAL to use against him, so they make one up, as they usually do. (Twitchy)
Sunday, November 22, 2015
The fix is in. Somebody has made Obama untouchable as he does everything in his power to HELP the Islamic terrorists win. My money is on George Soros, whose money has been behind everything bad that has befallen us during Obama's tenure and before. Obama has done many things that ARE treason, and NOBODY has seen fit to “call him on it.” Lately he's been allowing Muslim “refugees” in, while keeping Christians out. If that isn't obvious treason with all that's going on, I don't know what is. It's been a “bloodless” (“bloodless?”) coup having this traitor as president for the last 7 plus years. If we survive as a free nation it won't be because he didn't work HARD to end it. He should be in PRISON, not the White House. (FreedomOutpost)
Right here in the United States! And Obama's FBI is DOING NOTHING about it. Why is that? Because Obama has told them NOT to do anything about it, and they'd really like to keep their jobs, and not be sent to prison for disobeying him. Everything that can happen to advance the aims of the Islamic terrorists, Obama approves of. Everything that goes against them, he fights, as if he were one of them. I think her is, and always has been. He is a TRAITOR to his country. But that's not unexpected. He was BORN a Muslim, raised by Muslim parents, educated (in his early, formative years) in Muslim schools, and then further educated and mentored by a COMMUNIST, who expanded on his communist brainwashing from his family, and his schools. He IS a Muslim, AND a communist, which nobody with intelligence can deny. So it's not surprising he sides with our enemies. (Conservative Tribune)
If this is what cops can expect when making a routine stop to advise a black woman to walk AGAINST traffic to avoid being run over by a truck, it's no wonder applications for new recruits for the “cop shop” have gone down, significantly. But that's only a piffle compared to being concerned that some illegally-armed thug will shoot them as they drive by in their distinctively-marked cars, wearing their impressive uniforms with that bright, shiny target on their chests. This black woman, wearing a “hoodie” (the signature wear of criminals black AND white, bent on illegal activities), and walking on the wrong side of the road, was stopped and told that she ought to walk FACING traffic, so she wouldn't get “run over,” as she had come dangerously close to being, while the cops watched. The cops were concerned for her safety, and acted as perfect gentlemen, calling her “ma'am.”
Everybody shook as they left, but this PROFESSOR (who is also a DEAN) wrote an “op-ed” for a newspaper accusing them of “stopping me for walking while black,” and “not telling me why,” both of which are LIES, hoping to make trouble for the cops. Many blacks do this, accusing cops of racism where none exists, except in their minds, and exaggerating things (talking about “red lights and sirens”), claiming things that never happened. This is why cops NEED “body cameras,” AND in-car cameras, to counter these lies being told by many black racists, who want to PROMOTE the false claim that all cops are racist, while it is they, themselves, who are the racists. The “new racism” is black hating white racism, and every accusation of racism should be “taken with a BIG grain of salt. And they should NEVER be taken seriously without corroborating evidence beyond one person's unsupported word. Watch the video of the whole stop by clicking the link provided. (Hot Air)
Saturday, November 21, 2015
In Los Angeles County, this cop, who was not on duty, and was out of uniform, was apparently targeted by the killers, who obviously knew him. But will the liberal media take notice? Will they CARE? Same with the “black lives matter” fools. Will they care about a cop being murdered? Or will they ignore that while they make a lot of noise about the next “unarmed black” that gets killed while trying to take a cop's gun so he can kill him with it? Cops today need “eyes in the backs of their heads” to avoid getting a bullet there, fired by criminal FOOLS who don't know any better. What's really amazing about this is first, he wasn't even WHITE! He was Hispanic. And he was murdered right behind the Downey Police station. The dead cop is described as a “former Marine,” which is impossible. As long as he was alive he was STILL a Marine, albeit not on active duty. There ARE no “former Marines.” (Last Resistance)
The basic scheme for Muslims wanting to take over America is to immigrate, in large numbers, and breed like rabbits, so soon they outnumber us and can get their way that way. They have been successful in Hamtramk, MI, one of two suburbs of Detroit, which have large numbers of Muslims living there. I've heard about the Muslims in Dearborn, how they practically run things there, due to their numbers. But I've never heard about Hamtramk, before. My first knowledge of them was when they elected FOUR Muslims to the six-member Council. They'll probably get a Muslim mayor, too, since Muslims now outnumber human beings on the Council. If they keep this up and we LET them, they'll win without firing a shot. This city has become the first to make it's stupidity “official.” And electing a majority of Muslims IS stupidity, because they will quickly enact their own versions of law in spite of the Constitution and the Americans living there will have to live by them until the Supreme Court can act—which if they appoint enough Muslims or Muslim sympathizers to the Supreme court will be the END of America as a free country. That scares the hell out of me. Not the Muslims, but giving them the advantage of the LAW. (Conservative Byte)
Under Obama, Democrats have LOST 900 seats in state legislatures. Along with many seats in the national Congress, in both Houses. They've lost a BUNCH of governorships, as well. It's a DISASTER for Democrats—and it has been the same in the last THREE elections. It's ALL Obama's fault, but the liberal media ignores it, or makes excuses for it. One pundit says, “It strengthens the Republican stranglehold on the government.” (reversing the DEMOCRAT “stranglehold”) Of course, had those numbers been reversed, the narrative would have been different. And it's all Obama's fault. He has failed so miserably as president, he has been the best thing to ever happen to Republicans. They ought to hire him to make Republicans even stronger after he leaves office—IF he ever does. He has certainly shown a positive GENIUS for it. He may have set the Democrats back for generations! To liberal media figures, it's only “chaos” if the Republicans win. If the Democrats win, it's “something to celebrate.” (News Busters)
Friday, November 20, 2015
Our “astute” politicians are completely mystified as to WHY the Islamic terrorists are mad at us. Never mind the terrorists have told us, many times, exactly why they hate us: we're not Muslim! It's as simple as that. Being “nice to them” does NOT quell their anger in any way. The only thing they're mad about is that we don't recognize the “wisdom” of their “very special religion” that was formed in the seventh century among people who were IGNORANT and easily led by somebody like Mohammad, and convert to it. They think their “religion” is the best invention since sliced bread, something most of them have never seen.
Obama refuses to even USE the words, “Islamic terrorism,” or any other combination of words that mean the same. Hillary swears that ALL Muslims are “peaceful people” who mean us no harm, while militant Muslims all over rape, kill, and maim people who don't subscribe to their kind of Islam. Even other kinds of Muslims are subject to their ire if they don't believe EXACTLY the same way they do. And while they're at it, they “relax” by screwing little boys (and little girls). It's a “cultural thing” with them. ALL of them. Not just the extremists. Our politicians are so incompetent they can't see what's in front of their faces. And THAT will defeat us. Not the “excellence” of Muslims, which is a myth. (Hot Air)
Recently, the Daily Caller News foundation (DCNF) tried to gain entrance to the place where we stored our gold to research something that had nothing to do with the maintenance of precious documents by the federal government, and were repulsed by the usual bureaucratic foot-dragging. We've also been trying to get into the National Mint to find out of there's any gold left, or if it has been LOOTED, again to no avail. These places, and everything in them are OUR PROPERTY, and should be open to inspection, at all times. What are they HIDING? Why are government bureaucrats “stonewalling” us in our efforts to find out what they're doing, what they're HOLDING, and if there is even any gold LEFT in the U. S. Mint? Have they stolen it all? Is there no longer any gold to back up our currency? Are our “precious documents,” such as the Constitution, itself, GONE? Or have they been destroyed or damaged by the miserable conditions prevalent in the old building in which they've been stored? Such things should be transparent. Obama PROMISED a “transparent administration,” but hasn't delivered, on that, or any other promises except the ones we hate. (Daily Caller)
We were still an “infant state” when we first began fighting Islamic Terrorists. You've probably heard of the “Barbary Pirates,” who seriously compromised the shipping lanes soon after our “Revolutionary War” that we needed so desperately for money for shipping to support our fledgling government. No president before Thomas Jefferson wanted to do anything about it. But he sent in the Marines, which was a completely untried force at the time, and they “cleaned them out,” restoring peace to the Libyan area. That is the source of the Marine Corps hymn, which contains the words, “....from the Shores of Tripoli.” The “ruler” of Tripoli (which is now Libya) was overthrown, sailors they were holding for ransom were freed, and their pirate system destroyed (for a long time), stopping the pirate assault on the shipping lanes we depended on for money to support the new government in America.
Today, our “president” is much like those earlier presidents, in that he doesn't recognize the true threat today's “Barbary Pirates” (the Islamic terrorists) present. He won't even USE the words, “Islamic terrorism.” He HELPS the Muslims everywhere he can, and so do his henchmen. In this, he is a TRAITOR. The original Barbary Pirates were Muslims, too. So basically, we've been fighting Muslim terrorism since right after the American Revolution. Tell that to Obama and he'll laugh at you and tell you you're ignorant, although the ignorant one here is OBAMA. The book to which the link refers tells the story of this Tripoli war in detail you never heard in school—if they even MENTIONED it. (Town Hall)
Thursday, November 19, 2015
Now, not later. If we allow him to finish the rest of his term as president, he may finish the job of destroying this country in that time. It'll take forever to impeach and convict him, so it probably can't be done, legally. Anyway, he knows where most of the bodies are buried, and probably buried some, himself. I'm afraid it will take a “constitutional revolution.” U. S. Marshals need to go into the Oval Office and remove him in handcuffs, “perp walk” him to one of their cars, and take him to prison before he “gives away the store” entirely. He is even now allowing an Islamic terrorist “Trojan Horse” into this country in the GUISE of “Syrian refugees,” and is insulting everybody who says this is INSANE.
He's doing everything he can to HELP the Islamic terrorists “do their thing” in this country, and many Americans are going to DIE, because of it. There are maybe 30% real refugees among them, and 70% Islamic terrorists coming here to “kill unbelievers” and create havoc, any way they can. He has already spent more money than there IS. More than ALL presidents who came before, combined. He is going about bowing to despots, the world over, and saying we AREN'T the greatest nation ever. He says plainly he's “not interested in winning or being better than anybody else.” He's “hell-bent” on reducing us in the eyes of the world and establishing SOCIALISM as the means of governing.
He's almost finished the job, and he's working hard to elect that female criminal, Hillary Clinton (or that ADMITTED socialist, Bernie Sanders), to the presidency to make SURE the job gets finished. If we don't get rid of this saboteur in our midst, SOON, we'll be LOST. Now, I'm not SUGGESTING a revolution. I'm only saying I'm AFRAID that's what it will take to get rid of this “cancer spreading in this country” before he can do maximum damage. In any case, we need to do SOMETHING, and SOON. Before he becomes known as the president who “gave it all away.” (Just common sense)
What's the best way to gain thousands of voters for your party? Make a law ending the prohibition to vote for felons, and then release THOUSANDS of druggies from prison, all together, just before an election. They've been working on getting rid of that prohibition so their “kindred souls” can vote. These released prisoners know “which side of the bread carries the butter” and will no doubt vote Democrat, en bloc. This (Obama hopes) will ensure a Democrat victory in 2016 that will sweep that obvious CRIMINAL, Hillary Clinton (wife of another proven criminal, Bill Clinton), into the White House. The “Clinton Machine,” coupled with the “Obama Machine,” guarantees it, they hope. The Democrats can't win an HONEST election, so they do things like this, accompanied by their standard election scams, to win. Releasing 6,000 “druggies,” most of them SELLERS, will increase crime significantly. A fact they vigorously deny, as they usually do about the inevitable results of their idiotic actions. (Patriot Post)
That's Obama. Now he wants boys to be able to shower naked standing bedside a naked girl under the next shower head. Only in a world where BRUCE Jenner (who now calls himself Caitland) can win the “Woman of the Year” award from Glamour Magazine, this proving the absolute STUPIDITY of Glamour Magazine's management. I'll bet it's the first "woman" who has a penis ever won that award. This kind of thing is a result of the subjective philosophy of the “reigning idiots” in Washington, DC and elsewhere. We're seeing today an EPIDEMIC of such stupidity as “progressive Democrats” are still in charge, having CONNED their way into power. They have now PROVEN their stupidity in multiple policies they espouse, and their control is going to END soon, because of it. America doesn't “suffer fools” any longer than they have to. They have “kicked the bums out” in the last THREE elections, and are gearing up to do it again in the upcoming presidential elections. The worst thing that can happen to Democrats is for them to gain too much power, so they SHOW their stupidity, right out in the open, and LOSE their power. (Patriot Post)
Wednesday, November 18, 2015
Obama says that about the French after the Islamic terrorist attack in Paris. But that's one of his usual LIES. France has conducted HUNDREDS of raids on Islamic terrorists in just a couple of days after the attack. Islamic terrorists that they've only been “monitoring” up to now, but whose names and locations they KNEW. They immediately scooped up most of the rest of the plotters and may have even killed the mastermind of the raid. They're conducting air strikes on KNOWN terrorist enclaves in Syria and other countries, killing terrorists, right and left.
Meanwhile, how many YEARS has it been since the Islamic terrorist atrocity in Benghazi, Libya, on American diplomatic personnel? We have been able so far, to do NOTHING except LIE about the reason for the raid! CNN even was able to INTERVIEW one of the masterminds of that attack in a coffee shop, while we can't even IDENTIFY those planners. With all the might of the American government in the world, they can't even get the cooperation of the Libyan government, in whose country it happened! And Obama has the unmitigated GALL to say the French are “talking tough, and doing NOTHING. What a damned fool he is! (White House Dossier)
Their current stupidity is “gender identity.” They want to push the “right” for men who “identify” as women to use woman's restroom and locker rooms where they can see all kinds of naked females. The Houston mayor thinks her “bathroom ordinance” (which failed in a landslide” assures a “basic right” (of men being able to go to the bathroom next to a woman in the same room) is the “right thing to do.” The voters proved her wrong by voting it down. In San Francisco, the sheriff that supported “sanctuary cities” where an illegal alien could KILL someone and be released lost his job. The voters have spoken. I'm 78 and have numerous pains. I can barely walk. I'd LIKE to “identify” as 34. But strain as I might, I can't make it work. Men have no business in a woman's restroom or locker rooms, or especially not in their shower rooms.. But liberals think they do, on just their sayso that they “identify” as female. What a sweet scam THAT is!
That takes away a fundamental right of females to be able to “do their business” in private, without a man watching. This ordinance, if it had passed, would be an open invitation to sexual predators to be able to be in the same room with them as they “did their business.” I'd BET this would lead to many more sexual attacks on women. Liberals say it will never happen. Just as they say “concealed carry” will never be used to stop criminals in their tracks (it happens somewhere, every day, one time just recently, in Chicago). They're WRONG in every way they can be, but they never admit it. They just keep on making their STUPID laws, even when those laws backfire on them spectacularly. They don't have the INTELLIGENCE to do otherwise. The mayor says non-passage “stains” Houston's reputation for “tolerance.” What IS that “brown stain,” mayor? (Twitchy)
I have said many times that the top politicians in our government are, as a rule, incompetent. People deride me for saying that. Then the government immediately proves me right the very next day. As in this case, where they wanted to build a gas station in Afghanistan that, anywhere else (not government financed), would cost about $300,-000 dollars. Instead, under the auspices of our benevolent government, it cost $43 MILLION DOLLARS. 140 times more than it should have cost. The people who authorized payment can't explain the overage. They're too incompetent.--or crooked. Just like a few years ago the government bought a $300.00 HAMMER. Bad enough, but they're getting better (or worse, depending on your viewpoint).
According to the usual investment estimates for similar stations elsewhere, it should cost only $200,000to $500,000.The $3 million dollar estimate itself for this one is excessive, but they managed to exceed that by $40 million dollars! According to Afghanistan authorities, this station cost 140 times as it might have cost in Pakistan. The Department of Defense is “stonewalling” the investigation into WHY the overspending, which is no surprise. Whenever a government agency is investigated for its incompetence, it ALWAYS “stonewalls” the investigation, hoping it will become “old news” and the government will forget all about it. Predictably, since this is a Democrat administration, the liberal media has not said a word about it. (Town Hall)
Tuesday, November 17, 2015
When it comes to Islamic terrorists. He will not even USE the TERM “Islamic terrorists.” One time he was heard to say ISIS wasn't even MUSLIM! ISIS members must have been very much surprised to learn THAT! How many different ways can that coward Obama ignore the danger represented by these people who behead innocent CHILDREN as well as adults? Who are spreading like a cancer over the Middle East because nobody seems to be effectively fighting them? (Until they downed that Russian airliner and killed more than 150 innocents in Paris, that is). Now Russia and France are decimating their ranks. Oh, they're going to SUFFER because of that. And howl Screaming very loudly about being “profiled” and killed, “only because they're Muslim.” Nothing about the people they killed. They made their biggest mistake, there. Until they killed those Russians and French, nobody was fighting them much. Now they're losing people right and left, seeing their best installations blown up, and their leaders killed. They've lost more in the last few days than in all the time since they started. But it's up to somebody else to do it. Obama has his blinders firmly in place. Their “best friend in America” is no longer able to help them much. Though he is still trying, mightily. (Info Wars)
Most people who write for a living claim “writer's block” on occasion. A time when they are defeated by a blank sheet of paper (or now a blank computer screen) with no idea of what to write about. I never have that problem. Politicians (on both sides of the aisle) daily provide me with material. Their stupid actions abound. I'm never at a loss for what to write about. Every day, politicians do such STUPID things that my only problem is to decide what NOT to write about. There are only so many hours in a day and I'm approaching 80, which means I get tired easily. One subject I can never be silent on is their seeming predilection to believe SOCIALISM is a viable economic system when it is based on THEFT from those capable and willing to produce new wealth, so as to GIVE that stolen to those who don't produce, for whatever reason. They're constantly coming out with the most outlandish ideas and they think their sh-t doesn't stink. It does. It stinks badly. Moreso because their foolish ideas affect ME. If I were allowed to come up with a competence test for them all to pass, I would. But that'll never happen. Every incompetent politician out there (and that includes a majority of them) would oppose it. Just common sense)
I've been known to say most politicians are INCOMPETENT. Which is why we are constantly “in crisis” about SOMETHING. All this is due to the incompetence of politicians. The “gun crisis,” by the way (which doesn't really exist) and their “solution” to pass LAWS that CRIMINALS, who don't OBEY laws, are supposed to obey. Their belief that passing a law will stop criminals from getting guns is incompetence, in itself. As is their belief that they can designate certain areas as “gun-free zones” and expect those CRIMINALS to obey. Then there is the belief of so many politicians in collectivism (socialism, communism, etc.) as a solution to our economic problems, most of which they have created, due to their incompetence.
Collectivism, in all its forms, is a theory of THEFT from the producers of new wealth, and of GIVING that stolen to those who do not produce any new wealth, for whatever reason. Their very motto reveals it: “FROM each according to his ABILITY, and TO each according to his NEED.” Making NEED a DEMAND on the EARNINGS of those capable and willing to earn their own way. Any politician who believes in this IS incompetent. Politicians are quick to paint anybody who says we need to “test” the knowledge of BASIC human life” in order to be elected are “elites” who just want to keep certain people (mostly blacks and Hispanics, of course) out of elective office (they say that these people are KNOWN to not be very competent). ANY attempt to test the competence of politicians is decried by politicians, because they KNOW most of them couldn't pass the most BASIC of tests. (MSNBC)
Monday, November 16, 2015
Crush them. Obama says there have been “no changes” in his strategy concerning ISIS after the Paris atrocities. France has no such limitations. They have closed their borders and have gone in and “taken out” the Muslims they have been “watching” as they “prepared” for their own atrocities. They have captured many Islamic terrorists who have been getting together and plotting atrocities. Hopefully, unlike Obama, they will not “turn them loose” after a while, to go back and continue their plotting. Closing the borders means NOBODY comes in, especially “Syrian refugees,” most of whom are Islamic terrorists, anyway.
“Taking out” the cells they already knew about will rob the Islamic terrorists of manpower. Obama says his strategy is “the one that's going to work, but it will take time.” Sure. At least as long as HE is in office and responsible. If he thinks his strategy to “contain them,” not DESTROY them is going to work, he is DELUDED. Trying to “contain them” is like “herding roaches” to contain THEM. We need to KILL them. Every time we confront them. Don't just CAPTURE them, KILL them. Deprive them of their MANPOWER.
Whittle them down until there are none left, and others will be afraid to join, because they will KNOW it is a “death sentence,” just to BE an Islamic terrorist. France says they will be “ruthless” in taking them on. That means KILLING them when and where they find them. France has the right idea. Obama does NOT. His plan will NOT “work.” Since the Paris atrocities, France has performed 168 raids, and Belgium has followed suit. They have detained DOZENS of people. Hopefully, they will condemn them to DEATH, and carry it out quickly.
Not imprison them for a few years and ultimately release them as Obama is doing. First, we need to stop “coddling” Muslims as Obama has been doing and start PUNISHING them for their crimes. Any Muslim found screwing little boys or “marrying” little girls should be executed. That, being a “cultural thing” with them, but ILLEGAL in this country. It will get rid of most of them, as most of them do it. Then we must CRUSH THEM everywhere we find them. Declare them “persona non grata” with NO rights under our Constitution. Then GET RID OF THEM. (Washington Examiner)
Why do so many people hate Donald Trump? I can understand why Democrats (liberals) hate him. He's rich. And he makes no bones about it. He BRAGS about it while spending little of his riches in his quest to be president, at the same time monopolizing the media. Meanwhile, liberals are brainwashed to hate “the rich,” on principle. Another reason is his “Howitzer approach” to dealing with his critics. Some critic “takes a shot” at him with a pea-shooter, and he shoots back with a Howitzer. That frightens them. Why Republicans hate him is more a mystery to most people, but not to me. They're afraid he's going to “upset their little applecarts” and destroy their little “fiefdoms.” He makes them uncomfortable. The same things Democrats hate, they hate, too. If they criticize him, he “blows them out of the water.
They don't much like it that he's rich, either. They're subject to the same “conditioning” that RULES Democrats, even though most of them, like most of Democrats are, themselves, rich. If they weren't before coming to DC, they are, now. But the Republican elites usually get to DICTATE who we GET to vote for, and they're afraid he's going to destroy that. They know he can win WITHOUT being “subservient” to them because he doesn't need their money to get elected. Nor, if he does get elected (and he CAN win without them), he doesn't have to spend a large amount of his time begging for money. He will have time to actually GOVERN. There is only one way to stop him from getting the nomination, and winning the election: make rules that make it impossible while revealing to all their bias. To those who pay attention, anyway. The link here is to a liberal publication. So take their words with several “grains of salt.” (Esquire)
Obama could write a treatise on the best way to increase the crime statistics in one move. By releasing 6,000 “drug offenders” in one swoop. Drug users who haven't had a “fix” in a long time (in theory, anyway) and who have no money to buy drugs. If he doesn't think that will cause the biggest one-time crime increase ever, he's STUPID. But then, we know he has never been that intelligent. But I didn't think he was completely STUPID. He has shown his complete lac of intelligence in many of his policies—such as releasing so many Islamic terrorists to go back and kill more people. Another example is his determination to close GITMO. A more idiotic move in this day and age, I can't imagine. Obama is second only to George Soros as being the top danger to this country. Why we don't just GET RID OF HIM, I can't understand. I guess there just aren't enough people in DC with the gonads to do it. (Minuteman News)
Sunday, November 15, 2015
We all know that George Soros is Public Enemy #1. His money is behind most of the asinine acts of liberals, everywhere. Prick a violent liberal and you'll find Soros' blood. You name the riot, he's behind it. He PAID demonstrators to go to Ferguson, MO, to make trouble. But then there's Public enemy #1—Barack Hussein Obama. Obama has done everything he could to make life easier for Islamic terrorists, and other Muslims in America. Whenever a question comes up about Muslims, Obama sees to it that it is decided IN FAVOR of the Muslim. Like the court decision to award Muslim truck drivers who refused to deliver alcoholic beverages, even though they knew, when hired, that was part of the job, a six- figure award because they “were only doing what their religion demands.” Meanwhile, he sees to it a baker who went against the current narrative because of HIS religion got slapped with a six-figure FINE. And a county clerk who refused to issue a license for a gay marriage because of HER “religious convictions,” was sent to jail. Talk about an OBVIOUS double standard! We need to GET RID OF OBAMA, as quickly as possible, so he can do as little more damage as possible. It has now become critical for us to do so. Federal Marshals need to take him out of the Oval Office in handcuffs, “perp walk” him to a car (in front of all the TV cameras), and take him to jail, there to await tria; and sentencing for TREASON. Forget impeachment. His crimes are way more serious than that can handle, since he “knows where all the bodies are buried,” probably, and, Like Bill Clinton, buried a few, himself. (Human Events)
It looks like Obama is getting more and more cocky in his efforts to change our basic institutions for the benefit of Muslims. Each change convinces me more that he IS a Muslim, himself, no matter how much he denies it. Now he's changed the oath new citizens must take to BECOME citizens. It used to require them to swear to “fight for us” if necessary and/or give “noncombatant service” for their new country. Now no such service is required of new citizens “If such is against their religious teachings.” So Muslims can fight to defend Islam, but not the country to which they have moved. They don't “assimilate,” nor fight for their new country. What's next? A law making Islam the “religion of choice” for all Americans, whether or not they want it? How about a law making it official that Muslims will be SUPERIOR to native-born Christian Americans in all things? Obama is POISON to America and should be removed, at any cost. Immediately. And imprisoned for TREASON, if possible. (Human Events)
Hillary has joined the chorus of Democrats denying that we are “at WAR” with Islamic terrorism. Even though the best known Islamic terrorist outfit, ISIS, has PROMISED to come to America and kill people. She joins Obama, who won't even USE the words, Islamic terrorism, while they go about raping, murdering, and beheading citizens, adults and children, all over the Middle East and have had just 8 terrorists kill more than 150 people in Paris the other day because their targets are NOT military people. they go after “soft targets.” Non-combatants who are not much of a challenge because they are neither trained, nor armed against them. Just like 18 Islamic terrorists used four hijacked airplanes to kill more than 3,000 innocent civilians at the world Trade Center. But Obama and his accomplices still deny they're a danger to us and refuse to effectively fight them, leaving that to other countries. Obama as president will be the DEATH of us, yet. And that's the way that fool wants it. My sister calls him “Ovomit,” and that's appropriate. Hillary diverts things by saying we want people to be against ALL Muslims, not Muslim TERRORISTS, which is as phony as she is. (Newsweek)
Saturday, November 14, 2015
In one of the best illustrations of how one person with a loaded gun in an audience when a mass killer comes in to kill people, the massacre in France was carried out in that concert hall by TWO PEOPLE. A third was probably killed by a member of a biker gang who was attending the concert—and you know they ALL have guns. That reduced the number of attackers to TWO, who managed to kill about 100 or more people before men with guns came in and stopped them. When they saw the men with guns, they blew themselves up before they could be shot. Even now, stupid politicians are beginning “TALKS” with the Islamic terrorists in Syria. As if “talks” will stop them from their rabid killings. It's stupid politicians like this that CONTRIBUTE to the success (so far) of the Islamic terrorists, who use “talks” to stall while they become stronger while they go on. (New York Daily News)
By the stupid, and FOR the stupid. Obama and his government are living in a “dream world.” Like “Alice in Wonderland.” He recently said, “The terrorists are not gaining ground in Iraq , Afghanistan, or Syria.” He said it without using the term, “:Islamic terrorists.” He refuses to even SAY those words. He will NOT even recognize our enemy. Meanwhile, they're spreading over the Middle East like a “:plague of locusts,” destroying everything in their path. Raping, beheading little girls and adults, taking over towns and wreaking havoc everywhere they go. The only thing they understand is DEATH. They foolishly teach their stupid fighters that if they get killed in battle, supporting the Muslim cause, they'll go to a “paradise,” peopled by whores who somehow REMAIN “virgins,” even after they screw them for all eternity.
Meanwhile, they screw everything they can while still alive; women, men, little girls, little boys, probably even sheep, cows, and all other kinds of animals. Sometimes they even tape Muslim women and then the woman's fathers or brothers murder her for "dishonoring" the family. I think Obama is ONE of them, undercover. And the people who elected him for the second time are as stupid as they come. ISIS claims these attacks in France are “revenge for French air strikes in Syria. Of course. They think they can “do their dirty work” and NOT be attacked, in return. They think we should just let them do it, and NEVER retaliate. More stupidity. They made a bad mistake by this attack, and by threatening to do the same in other national capitols. Their “days are numbered,: as Secretary of State Kerry told them. What they do does NOT “weaken us.” It “stiffens our national spine.” Come here to kill us, and you will DIE. They will die, even if they don't. Count on it. We'll be happy to help them get to "paradise." (CBS, DC)
Obama doesn't have the INTELLIGENCE to see the Islamic terrorists for what they are-- a scourge upon the Earth. Somebody to be ENDED. Wiped out, to a man. Yes, I said, MAN. For just about all the Islamic terrorists are men—except for a few stupid women who LIKE being second class citizens, subject to the will of ANY man. Slaves to men. He CLAIMS to be a Christian, but makes ignorant statements like, “Man cannot advance by insulting Islam,” or words to that effect. He bows to despots and dictators and shuns Jews, whom they oppress.
He “rules” in favor of the Muslim position every time he gets a chance. He refuses to allow his people to treat Muslims in this country with the suspicion they deserve. He won't “bug” mosques to find out what drivel their Imams are preaching there. He is a solid FRIEND to Muslim extremists, even though he DOES feebly “attack” them and call our attention to those attacks (which he purposely plans so they always do as little damage to them as possible) to make us think he's not their accomplice. He tells us he has “contained” them, while they create chaos in one of our allied nations with wanton killing. He needs to be arrested for his traitorous actions, and condemned to DEATH. But that'll never happen. People in DC have no gonads for it. (Town Hall)
Friday, November 13, 2015
I'm hearing reports of some shootings in Paris, France. What the hell? Aren't there tight “gun laws” in France? They don't have a Second Amendment over there. So how did it happen? Liberals tell us all we need is more LAWS against law-abiding people carrying guns and gun violence will cease. Of course, that ignores the many guns in the hands of CRIMINALS and terrorists, who got them illegally. Later reports tell us of several different scenes of attack (up to SEVEN now), with dozens killed and hundreds taken hostage with at least one attacker in a concert venue firing into a crowd, screaming, “Allahu akbar!”. That this is an Islamic terrorist attack goes without saying. There is no evidence of talk of a phony video.
With the hundreds of thousands of young male Muslims and few women not only being ALLOWED to come here, but many of which whose passage is PAID by the federal government (at Obama's behest), how long will it be before this happens here? These cowards don't fight SOLDIERS, who can defeat them. They fight innocent civilians, most of whom are unarmed (by their government), and CANNOT fight back. Obama's actions in bringing Muslim “refugees” here (at OUR expense) must be STOPPED, by whatever means necessary. He's using OUR money to bring Muslim terrorists here by the hundreds of thousands. I can only hope the French army can sneak into that concert stadium and “pick off” all the terrorists there before they even know they're under attack. Remember, the report linked here is a PRELIMINARY report and things will change as more facts come out. (The Telegraph)
If we lose to the Islamic terrorists, it won't be because they're superior. It will be because our “leaders” won't even ADMIT they are at war with us. Obama won't even USE the words, “Islamic terrorism.” Further, whenever a conflict comes up between Muslims and anyone else, Obama and his fools “rule” in favor of the Muslims. One of the most recent examples is some Muslim truckers who refused to deliver alcohol and got fired for it. They got $240,000.00 from an American court! Meanwhile, bakers who refuse to bake cakes for gay “weddings,” similarly against their religious beliefs, have been given a $135,000.00 FINE for doing so.
What's the difference? In one case, the “victims” were Muslims. In the other, Christians. The judges who made these decisions were STUPID. Both of them. And if they'd like to cite me for contempt of court for saying that, I plead GUILTY. I have NOTHING but contempt for these “courts.” The “peaceful Muslims” who come here might not be killing people (yet), but they came here for one reason: to make as much trouble as they can. And they're doing it. In one place, they invaded a Christian church and removed symbols of Christianity. If we were to do that in a mosque, the complaints about “religious intolerance” would be never ending. (World Net Daily)
Why not? Why can't they “get” Hillary? They “got” Gen.Patraeus easily enough for something very similar. Why has she been able to lie, misdirect, and ridicule all efforts to get her for her “crimes while they find nothing?” It's like the “investigation” into her husband's sexual activities, not only in the White House, but before he ascended to the presidency. They finally “got” him to some degree. They were finally able to impeach him, but his intimate knowledge of “where the bodies were buried” prevented his CONVICTION and removal from office, even though they did prove he DID lie to Congress, under oath. He also lied, misdirected and ridiculed their efforts. He even was able to somewhat “demonize” the investigator and I'm sure Hillary has that in mind, too. But that doesn't explain why they have worked so long, spent so much valuable time and money, and STILL have not been able to definitively prove what we already know.
That she committed a crime, just by HAVING her own, private e-mail system while in office as Secretary of State, regardless of whether or not she received, or sent “classified” information over it. The fact remains, ANY messages she sent, doing business as Secretary of state, MADE them classified. And the claim that she didn't do business by e-mail in this day and age, as well as her claim not to even HAVE a computer in her office is ludicrous. She certainly did have SEVERAL “computers” (cell phones today ARE computers) on her person. What I wonder is, do they really WANT to “get” her? Is the “congressional investigation” merely a “dog and pony show” designed to make us THINK they're “doing something?” Probably not, unless the guy running it is only pretty good at convincing us he IS serious, but is not.. But the fact remains, when the “victim” is a Democrat, we generally get nothing. When he/she is a Republican, we do. (Just common sense)
Thursday, November 12, 2015
A twiddly “man” was subjected to opinions not his own outside a Wal-Mart store and ran home to lie in his “birth position” on the floor for three and a half days because of it. Now he's demanding the RESIGNATION of the President of Wal-Mart because of it. This article is a parody of the “average liberal” today, who demands all sorts of STUPID things and threatens to come, with his friends, and stand outside the store holding “non-offensive” (to him) signs, chanting slogans and irritating everybody in earshot if the president didn't resign. Some of the things he's demanding may seem to be fanciful, but they would demand them if they thought they would get away with it. I really get tired of seeing all the "demonstrators" and hearing all their fool demands, for their IMAGINED slights. We're becoming a "nation of fools" who will "demonstrate" over the dumbest things, DEMANDING the stupidest things. (The Blaze)
I saw an article recently on “How to Quit Smoking,” which told people many different ways to quit. There's a million dollar industry based on telling people how to quit smoking. But they failed to give them the most simple and easy one. Just QUIT, as I did some thirty years ago. I woke up one day after 45 years “making like a chimney” and decided I was tired of it. So I quit. I just STOPPED. I still had a half pack of smokes left in my pocket that ended up crumbled to dust eventually. I didn't do all sorts of things to “take my mind off smoking.” I even refrained from telling my wife I had quit so she wouldn't “help” me quit. I wanted to do it without anybody's “help.” But I suspect she knew, since she didn't have to empty ash trays, any more. Quitting is simple, if you have ANY willpower, at all. You have to WANT to quit. You can't be quitting to please anybody but yourself. I haven't smoked ANYTHING since that day, nor WANTED to. If you don't have enough willpower, don't try it, If you don't REALLY want to, don't bother. You'll fail. But if you decide you really WANT to quit, and you DO have the willpower, you will succeed, and be respected by all who know you. My son is almost 50 now, and he still marvels at my quitting like that. (Just common sense)
A pregnant woman was driving carelessly and so damaged her unborn baby that it died six days after it was born. The cops arrested her and charged her with murder, and she was convicted. But then a higher court, decided the live baby “was not a person” since the original injury was gotten before it was born, and declared her not guilty. What IGNORANT judges they have in New York! Yet these are the people who direct our lives, in their ignorance. This is an OBVIOUS example of judges deciding a case, based on their OPINION, not the law. And nobody seems to be in a position to “call them on it.” The dissenting judge was sickened by the actions of his colleagues. He said, “Apparently a person is not a person until it has 'passed through the portal of birth,' even if it dies six days later.” He further said, “This is such a silly claim that it makes a mockery of the law and belittles life, itself." If this is what we've come to in this country, we're DOOMED. (Eagle Rising)
Wednesday, November 11, 2015
Global warming is one big HOAX, perpetrated upon us by a Democrat former (thank God) vice-president, to fatten his wallet. And fatten his wallet it has, to the point where, if he sits down with it in his pocket, he'd fall over sideways. It has made him a BILLIONAIRE. Now Obama has taken up his swindle, as has the United Nations, over an IMAGINARY danger. They realize what a priceless swindle it has been for Gore, and they want some of that for themselves. For them it's not money so much as it is POWER. It gives them the opportunity to take power over the rest of us. The money will come, later. The United Nations now wants to make “legally-binding” climate change laws, world wide. That's in addition to their effort to take out guns away. They just don't understand the concept of the Second Amendment.
This from a useless organization that sucks up money like a sponge sucks up water, that is RUN by the nation's dictators, who would like nothing more than to make laws for US which they have NO RIGHT to do, and hopefully never will--unless Obama, in his incompetence and ignorance, allows it. This would be one BIG step toward their “wet dream” of world government. We need to squash this foul odor on the New York skyline, NOW, before we (with Obama's cooperation) allow it to overtake us. We rejected the first attempt at a “United Nations” with our rejection of the League of Nations many years ago. But they succeeded in their second attempt to establish an abortion such as the UN, and we will ultimately suffer for it. (Activist Post),
A Muslim Imam told “moderate Muslim” viewers of an interview on a Norwegian TV station that any Muslim had “the right to kill” anybody who disrespected Islam. Not only was it ALLOWED, it was DECREED, by Koranic Law, that ALL Muslims have the DUTY to kill them. These are the so-called “moderate Muslims” he was talking to! We've always known this, but Muslims insist it is not true, and it is a “myth.” Now it has been CONFIRMED, by no less than an Imam. This malevolent “religion” should be SHUNNED, everywhere. But it won't be, not as long as Obama is president. Obama is not only IN FAVOR of whatever Muslims want, but he swears he is NOT a Muslim, himself. And that approval has spread to other countries, who ALSO give “special treatment” to Muslims. Remember, it is OKAY to LIE to advance the agenda of Islam, according to no less than the Koran (however they spell it today). And Obama is a KNOWN liar. So if he insists he ISN'T a Muslim, you can believe he IS. (Eagle Rising)
They're definitely smarter than Americans! I'm talking about American POLITICIANS, not citizens. They can easily see the danger they're being put in by their government allowing in thousands of Muslim “refugees,” many of whom are simply Islamic terrorists who have come there to kill people. They're going out and buying guns with which to defend themselves. Unlike Americans, many of whom have docilely allowed their government to disarm them in the face of similar danger. Our politicians daily pass unconstitutional measures to DISARM us. Now they're even trying to stop us from buying BULLETS, which have no Second Amendment protection.
If our danger was just from the usual armed criminals who have no trouble getting their guns ILLEGALLY, that would be one thing. But with the expected influx of Islamic terrorists that Obama is not only ALLOWING in, but is actively using our tax money to FINANCE, makes it a lot worse. I'll tell you frankly, I'm going to get a gun (maybe more than one) and I'm not going to do it legally so the government can't come and take it away from me. You might say I'm opening myself up to charges, but if those liberal fools can publicly tell people to kill cops with impunity, I shouldn't have to worry. I'm only talking about MAYBE breaking the law, in the FUTURE. Until I DO it, there's no law to be broken, though they'll probably try to make one up. (Freedom Outpost)