Why Spend $40 Million?

Bob Mueller said that the only reason why Trump wasn’t charged with a crime is because “a sitting president can’t be charged with a crime,” intimating that he IS guilty of a crime, but they can’t prosecute him. If that is true, and I’m not saying it isn’t, why the hell did the US government spend $40 million dollars of your MONEY on a two-year-long exercise in futility? His purpose was, I am sure, to make the world think that President Trump DID commit crimes, for which he couldn’t be prosecuted, so why bother? Why bother, indeed? The whole Mueller “investigation” was a sham, a CON designed to cover up the real Russian collusion that was actually (and provably) done by Hillary Clinton and was the very BASIS for Mueller’s sham “investigation.” The “Steel Dossier” was KNOWN to be false, even BEFORE his “investigation” began, and he had to know that. But he went ahead, anyway, using that false document to obtain “warrants” to spy on the Trump campaign. This has been one of the biggest cons ever perpetrated on the American pubic, and this supposedly “honest man” knew it, and went along with it. Which should rightly forever stain his so-called “sterling reputation.” His entire presentation was purposely designed to keep the con alive, after he failed to find ANY evidence of wrongdoing, in the hands of the Congress, whose House is peopled by many anti-Trumpers, and could be counted on the keep it going. And Jerry Nadler picked it right up, as planned. (Just common sense)

Formerly Rich Man

This is the story of a formerly rich man who has been destroyed by Mueller’s goons because he will NOT lie, and “plead guilty” to something he did not do to stop it from destroying him further. They got what they wanted out of Trump’s former lawyer when he lied to get his “punishment” minimized, but Roger Stone refused to lie AGAINST President Trump, and Mueller’s goons ruined him. He is now broke. He had to move out of his home into a small apartment, which is now all he can barely afford. He couldn’t afford a moving company, so he and his wife did all the moving of their possessions into their new apartment. While so doing, his wife broke her ankle in a freak accident while doing something better left to the pros.

Even so, she is solidly behind his decision not to “crumble” under the pressure and LIE to incriminate a man who cannot be incriminated without lies. This is the woman, you remember, was forced to stand outside in the cold in her nightie with her husband who was only wearing his pajamas, while 39 heavily-armed thugs searched their home in a pre-dawn military-style raid that is usually reserved for the worst criminals. The worst part of it is that Trump can’t even relieve him of his suffering because Mueller cleverly gave most of his “findings” to state courts, where a presidential pardon is not possible. Even though he couldn’t find a thing to use against President Trump, he made sure anybody who ever worked for him suffered I the progress of his “investigation” (witch hunt). (Just common sense)

Why Do They do It?

Why do politicians keep trying to violate the Second Amendment of the Constitution? They know that's what they're attempting, and it's wrong. But they not only keep doing it, they "jump up and down" and shout, "Look at me! I'm taking guns away, making you defenseless! Elect me so I can do it better than my opponent!" That's what's happening in Colorado, right now. One politician ran for governor on a strict anti-gun fool platform. Living in Denver as he does, among Dumocrats, he thinks that will get him elected (and it did). Even so, the Colorado House just passed a "gun confiscation measure." Whether it goes any further than that is in question. Because one chamber is dominated by Dumocrats, the other is NOT. They show pro-gun demonstrators, painting them as fools, They let them show their signs, citing LOGICAL arguments such as "No-Gun Zones Are Death Traps!" Then just IGNORE them, as if they didn't exist. They NEVER answer our LOGICAL arguments, treating them as if they were laughable. The one basic question they NEVER answer is this: "What makes you think a CRIMINAL, who disobeys laws for a living, will OBEY a law saying he can't use a gun in his life of crime?" (Just common sense)

How They Con Us

The picture linked here is an illustration of how the left cons us into believing things like, “Border Control abuses children.” This picture is a clear setup, designed to make us think Border Control agents force children down with their “hob-nailed boots” on their heads. Just seeing the picture as it was published sparks an infuriated response. But seeing the entire picture shows us just how phony it is. It’s as phony as those Islamic terrorist photos of people carrying “dead children” we are supposed to have killed. The truth is, they killed them, themselves. So don’t believe everything you see in the news, people. What you have to remember is that the left will do ANYTHING to con us into believing their swill. (iPatriot)

Who's He to Talk?

Word is that House Oversight and Reform Committee Chairman Elijah Cummings is pushing an “investigation into Fox News because they, according him, would not publish a story he says contains “proof” that Donald Trump had an affair with porn star Stormy Daniels. Of course, he can’t say what form, that “proof” takes, because there isn’t any. It’s all in his feeble brain. Cummings is a “political hack” who is trying to foster the MYTH that Trump has “something in his past” that would prohibit him from being president, something the Dumocrat Party desperately would like to find. Unfortunately for them, there’s nothing to find, and that’s proven by more than two years of multiple “investigations,” none of which have found anything resembling any kind of proof of any of their “wild claims” against Trump. Many millions of taxpayer dollars (our money) have been spent in this fruitless quest, and it’s time this government stopped financing the “silent coup” that is underway, and in which Cummings plays a major part, along with “Pencil Neck” Schiff and others. The truth of the matter is that Fox was reluctant to publish a story without some kind of proof it was true, and not a Dumocrat Party construct. (DC Alert)

Big NRA Protest Fizzle

The anti-gun fools promised a big protest at the recent NRA meeting, and almost a half dozen showed up. Big fizzle. Cops "expected" large turnouts of anti-gun protesters at the event NRA event, but they couldn't even get a half dozen. I guess the support for their silly anti-gun laws isn't very strong, after all. They made a big thing in New York about the NRA having to "go underground" and rent a hall under a false name, thinking that was a real indication they were “in the wrong." But actually, all it was, is an indication of how wrong the anti-gun fools are. They tried to get what they couldn't get in law by pressure on the owners of such halls, and even that didn't work. The media covered the event in the usual way. Instead of talking about the $100 million dollars the convention brought to the Dallas area, they talked about the "savvy young activists” [who] planned to use the three-day event to 'underscore their campaign' against the “powerful lobby for firearm makers.” Yeah; all six (maybe) of them. The media would have been more comfortable picking up dog doo-doo with their bare hands. The anti-gun fools are planning more and flashier "demonstrations" later on. Yeah. If both protesters show up. (Truth About Guns)

Mueller's Final Statement

He couldn’t find evidence that Trump was guilty of ANY crime, but he refused to “exonerate” him. Hey, Bob! That’s not what prosecutors do! If they cannot find evidence that the subject is guilty, they are constrained from saying so. Not so with Mueller. He must make his statement so ambiguous that Dumocrats can “jump on it” and “keep investigating.” Jerry Nadler says he will keep on looking for ways to prove President Trump’s “crimes” and “lies.” Which is much like that long ago sheriff’s statement that, “We will try this bloody murderer before we hang him for his crime.” The Dumocrats will continue to hunt for evidence of a crime in Trump’s actions, and if they can’t find it, they will make it up. They “know” he is guilty of SOMETHING, they just can’t prove it. They pinned their hopes on Mueller finding evidence of a crime on President Trump’s part, and he let them down, although very gently, leaving them room to claim there WERE crimes, but they just couldn’t prove it. Something a normal prosecutor cannot do, but which Mueller did. The evidence of an attempted coup is so obvious, it’s a wonder charges haven’t been filed on many Dumocrats. But they’re Dumocrats, so charges are not likely until Trump’s investigations are finished. And that frightens Dumocrats, no end. (New York Times)

Weasel Words

Robert Mueller spent nine minutes spouting “weasel words” about his “investigation.” He said the only reason he didn’t pursue charges against President Trump is because it would be unconstitutional. In addition, he said he “couldn’t exonerate the president.” But that isn’t what he is supposed do. His job is NOT to “exonerate” anybody. He must either find evidence of his guilt, or he is INNOCENT. He says “If we had confidence the president clearly didn’t commit a crime, we would have said so.” Again, that’s not your job, Bob. If you can’t find EVIDENCE he committed a crime, you just need to SHUT UP. You don’t get to poison the jury (the electorate) with such statements—that is, if you were any kind of a REAL prosecutor, that is. His whole “statement” was designed to say Trump was guilty without actually saying it. To give the Dumocrats leeway to continue to pursue those false “crimes.” In the United States, a defendant is innocent until proven guilty—unless, it seems, he is the president, and the Dumocrats don’t want him to be. (Just common sense)

UK Outraged Over Truth

There have been many stories in the "alternative media" about the number of KNIFE deaths in the UK since they made such a big thing abut almost completely BANNING guns there, and knife injuries took over, predictably. They say the stories are "absurd and offensive" to the families of knife victims. They say the families of children killed in knife attacks are offended by Trump's remarks at the NRA meeting. They hate his claiming that the right to bear arms could make a difference in "battling gang violence." Never mind what he said it absolutely true. Their outrage comes from the sure knowledge that they are WRONG, and he's right. They hated his reference to "blood all over the floors of emergency rooms," which may have been a reference to the remarks by Martin Griffiths, a surgeon at the Royal London Hospital, who likened an emergency ward there to an Afghan war zone due to the number of victims of knife attacks." Their outrage stems from the fact that they KNOW they're wrong, and hate to admit it. They SAY they've made "amazing progress" in their efforts to stop gang crime, but I seriously doubt their figures. They say that more guns is NOT the answer, and in that, they're wrong. Guns in the hands of the law-abiding MIGHT cause a temporary increase in gun violence, as honest people kill off the thugs with their ILLEGAL guns, but it will ultimately be the answer. Their problem is, they just don't TRUST the law-abiding to abide by the law, if they have guns in their hands. (Telegraph)

The Coup That Failed

What you have been witnessing for the last two years plus, is a “failed coup” designed to unseat a legally-elected president. We may have had some before this, but this one is the most obvious there has ever been, if people will just open their eyes and see it. Dumocrats thought Donald Trump was just doing a publicity stunt when he announced, for the second time, a run for president. They continued their usual “dirty tricks” designed, as usual, to get their “hand-picked candidate,” Hillary Clinton, elected, so they could continue fleecing the nation. She lost, and the Dumocrats are still in a coma.

They can’t believe that all their chicanery couldn’t get her elected, and they’ve been making excuses ever since. They tried to prove President Trump “colluded with the Russians” to get elected. Their pet FBI director, Comey, haired their per “fixer, “Bob Mueller, to reverse the results of the election. He hired all “Trump-hating” lawyers as his staff, and ruined several lives and fortunes in his effort. He failed, and the pressure built. Next, they tried to get his taxes so they could find, or make up something to use to get him out of office. That failed. Then they accused him of a “cover-up,” as usual without any evidence.

Then he declassified the records in the many phony Dumocrat “investigations,” and they started to crumble. Nancy Peelosi got to where she couldn’t finish a sentence without stammering, and Jerry Nadler passed out in front of many people. He says it was “nothing,” just a result of his hard work. But actually, it was the build-up of pressure because they know that pretty soon all their tricks and scams will be revealed, and some of them will go to prison. NO longer is their target a wimp that will not “come back on them.” They picked the wrong guy this time, and they’re going to suffer for it.

When President Trump announced the investigation into the investigators, they knew the end was near. The more they scream and cry, and whine, the closer he gets to the truth, and they’re terrified. No other Republican has reacted this way to their scams and schemes. They’ve just given up and accepted defeat. Not so Donald Trump. He is going to make them pay, and they can see retribution coming—and they’re collapsing in terror. This may just mean the end of the Dumocrat Party. As they go the way of the Whigs. They were, oh, so confident that their tricks would work, but they didn’t. And they will soon see the results of that failure. (The Blacksphere)

The New Communists

At least, according to the Trump haters out there. One of the questions being asked of everybody in politics is, “Are you now, or have you ever been a card-carrying conservative?” They’re trying hard to make being a conservative into something nasty. So if you disagree with The Dumocrats, in any way, you should be imprisoned for life, according to Dumocrats. I wouldn’t be surprised if soon they will be introducing legislation to MAKE being a conservative a crime, as they have tried to make not believing in that “global warming/climate change” swindle. They have already succeeded in making ANY criticism of any Muslim, anywhere into something bad, having coined that phony word, “Islamophobia.” This is how Dumocrats operate. They can’t answer any of our questions, so they concoct schemes to make it a crime to question them, in any way. I’m NOT a conservative. Now, before you accuse me of “running away” from the label, this: I am a “rational individualist,” and my views are very close to conservatism. But I can’t CLAIM to be a conservative because I don’t agree with every element of conservatism. (Legal Insurrection)

What's It about Waffle House?

All of a sudden fools are targeting Waffle Houses for their gun antics. I was in a Waffle house the other day, and I was a little bit worried while I waited for my order. Fortunately, nobody came in with a gun and shot me. But you won't hear about this Waffle House shooting in the liberal media, because it didn't happen the way the would-be shooters intended. Two guys with guns came in and started robbing the place. One came down the aisle demanding money from customers while the other jumped the counter, doing the same. But one customer wasn't cowed. He produced his own gun and shot the guy, causing him to run like a jackrabbit. When the guy behind the counter turned his gun on that customer, he got the same treatment. He "set out for the tall timber," as well. He was later found in a hospital, being treated for several gunshot wounds. Apparently that customer missed that first robber--or he outran the bullets They don't say if they caught him, but I think they will. Look for the liberal media to ignore this shooting because no customers got killed. (Conservative Tribune)

Don't Elect Muslims

Not because of their religion, but because of they way they think. Ilhan Omar recently said the US “killed children” at the border, which is a flat-out LIE. and she knew it was a lie. Rahisha Tlaib says reports of the Holocaust are false. Then there is the Deputy Chairman of the DNC, Kieth Ellison, who has made many anti-American statements. All three are “America haters,” and have proven it by their statements. They are ample illustrations of what we can expect as more and more Muslims get elected by gullible Americans. They are an example of Muslims doing by election what they can’t do militarily. These Muslims might not be terrorists, but their very way of thinking is anti-American and thus, they should have never been elected. All three were elected by the high density of Muslims in Minnesota, and Detroit. So they are ample evidence that electing Muslims are not in out best interests. Muslim “leaders” plan on getting as many radical Muslims elected as possible, all over the country, so they can get laws made that Muslims like. And since most of their ideas are inimical to American interests, that will be a bad thing. They want Sharia Law in the United States, and they will do everything they can to get it established here, even though Sharia Law is contrary to our Constitution. Muslims are told that their loyalty is ALWAYS to Islam, FIRST, and other things second. That is NOT what we want in our elected representatives. (Just common sense)

Collusion Failed. Now Taxes

Dumocrats are frustrated. After a couple of years of looking under every rock, and in every crevice, they couldn’t turn up, or even pony up any kind of evidence that President Trump “colluded” with the Russians to get elected, while working hard to IGNORE sure evidence that HILLARY colluded with the Russians. The Mueller Report came out, and IT found nothing. So now they’re trying to get Trump’s tax records, hoping that, in that morass of figures, they can find something, ANYTHING they can use to reverse the results of the 2016 election. This is a COUP that failed. I can’t even call it a “bloodless coup,” because people have been hurt, even KILLED. Others imprisoned for things they did, or might have done, BEFORE they ever got close to President Trump. Every week, it seems, Dumocrats predict that in the next few days, there is going to be revealed, a “bombshell,” and then Trump will be DONE. But it never happens. They’re still predicting a bombshell, and THAT will not happen, so they’ll move on to something else. (Legal Insurrection)

School Knife Attack

You won't hear about this attack in the liberal media because it doesn't promote their narrative. In communist China, it is almost impossible to get a gun legally. So guns are few and far between--except in the hands of criminals and terrorists, who get their guns ILLEGALLY. But that didn't stop the guy who went into a school and started stabbing children. He killed SEVEN defenseless children that way. As they say in this article, "Criminals will find a way." No amount of useless gun laws will stop a determined killer from killing. All they do is stop the law-abiding from being able to defend themselves, and gets them KILLED. The anti-gun FOOLS won't admit this, and keep on trying to disarm the populace--for their own purposes, whatever they are. I think there is just a certain kind of politician who is AFRAID of an armed populace, and wants to do away with as many legal guns as he/she can. But this attack is further proof that what we have said here is unalterably TRUE, no matter what those FOOLS who want to disarm the populace say, or think. (Liberty Park Press)

"Welcome to Colorado!"

“Where you can get away with MURDER, as long as it is only that “nonviable mass” in a potential mother’s stomach that used to be thought of as a child. Abortion is legal here, and you can have all the unprotected sex you wish without ever having to worry about having to raise the result, if you don’t want to. I’m sorry to say I live in Colorado, but you won’t ever see me having anything to do with an abortion, because I wouldn’t ever want to KILL a defenseless infant. If I didn’t want to raise one I had sired, there is always adoption. An abortion is just as hard on a woman’s body as is childbirth, and there is no shortage of people who actually WANT your child, if you don’t. Abortion is MURDER. It “stills a beating heart.” Abortion is NOT about “a woman’s right to control what happens to her own body.” If it were, prostitution would be legal. It IS about that child’s right to live a life. It is a real person, no matter how pro-abortion people say it isn’t. That’s just something they say to justify that murder. And if you don’t believe it is murder, just watch as a doctor sucks the brain out of that child to kill it. (Just common sense)

Latest "Victim," Biden

One of the most popular scams the Dumocrats use against their enemies, Republicans, and others, is the females who CLAIM sexual impropriety, while they have NO PROOF, kept quiet about it for many years, and only come out after one of them starts the parade. They can’t seem to find a popular presidential candidate out of the many who have announced, and started spending the millions of dollars Dumocrat fools give them. They didn’t see how to “get around” Joe Biden being their “front runner,” even though he has not even announced, so they brought out that old sexual impropriety scam. They couldn’t find any REAL accusations, so they went after him for “hugging” women of all ages, even “smelling their hair,” and “making them uncomfortable.” After the first accuser appeared, predictably, more appeared, some from this old man’s HIGH SCHOOL days. Meanwhile, they completely IGNORED Bill Clinton’s excesses, even his actual RAPES, but now they want Biden to “get out of politics” over “huggergate.” They don’t want him because he is NOT a socialist, and socialists have “taken over” the Dumocrat Party and, if he gets the nomination, it will set back the “socialist movement” in the United States. They’re now “eating their own.” The article linked below talks about four women, but the total now is 7 women who have “remembered” “ol’ Joe” making them “uncomfortable.” (Legal Insurrection)

Forcing NRA "Underground"

Some New York politicians are crowing about the fact that the NRA recently had to rent a hall under a different name to avoid their unconstitutional pressure for their citizens to NOT allow them to have meetings in opposition to gun control. They arrogantly think that's a GOOD THING, when it is NOT. It is a violation of the "free assembly" clause in the Constitution, the document to which ALL LAWS must conform. They arrogantly think they can ignore it, make their laws, and enforce them, without consequences. But such laws will eventually be DECLARED unconstitutional, and thrown out. But not until after maybe YEARS in which they are enforced, and the damage has been done. And without provisions to PUNISH the makers of such laws, they will continue to make them. Forcing the NRA "underground" is NOT a "good thing," and violates a basic constitutional RIGHT. The right to "free assembly," which the Constitution GUARANTEES, along with the right to FREE SPEECH. It's too bad they can't be arrested, charged, and imprisoned for such violations. One politician says that the fact that they have to rent halls under different names is PROOF they are "in the wrong." But actually, all it proves is that New York politicians have overstepped their lawful authority, and THEY are "in the wrong." (Reason Magazine)

Fools Boycott Georgia

Many fools out there, and they’re all boycotting the State of Georgia because they passed a law limiting baby murder in their state. Colorado Sec. Of State had the temerity to boycott Georgia, and actually asked Planned Parenthood, the biggest infanticide provider, to “edit” her “official document” on the subject. Then one producer of a TV show to be shot in Georgia decided not to do it there—again because of Georgia’s recognition that abortion is MURDER. And there are many other individuals and organizations likewise boycotting Georgia for this stupid reason. Abortion IS murder because it requires murderous actions, like “sucking out the brains” of a live baby or stabbing it in the head to kill it before it is allowed to be born. Then there are the states (New York, and others) that actually allow a baby to be BORN, and lay on a table ALIVE, until the mother makes a decision whether to let it live, or have the doctor MURDER it. This is bloody murder, and only fools deny it. Yes, I may even personally know someone who has been a party to a baby-killing. I don’t care. If they killed their baby, I don’t want to know them. Even if they are related to me. Liberals accused returning soldiers of being “baby killers” in the past, but they ARE “baby killers,” in real life, and ought to be imprisoned for it, some even executed. “Take their own medicine,” so to speak. Be the subject of delayed abortion. (Just common sense)

They're Really Frightened

President Trump promised to “drain the swamp” in DC, and he’s actually DOING it, unlike most politicians, who promise much and do little. The fact that his promise will affect a large majority of politicians now in power in DC and elsewhere frightens them no end. So they don’t just want to get rid of him as a power, they want him to DIE. In prison, if possible. One failing Hollywood actor, John Cusak, who has starred in a few “blockbusters,” but has done not much of anything in recent years, says that “democracy is dead unless Donald Trump rots in prison.” Naturally, he cites no “crimes” to back up that statement, only that it is his OPINION. Much like the opinions of the “swamp dwellers” with whom he spends time. The “swamp dwellers” in DC aren’t hard to identify. They’re the ones most vicious and vitriolic in their condemnation of President Trump without any kind of REAL “crimes” he is supposed to have committed. They confidently say his policies will be the DEATH of America, while he goes on “cleaning up the messes” for which the swamp dwellers are responsible for. He has accomplished more for America than ANY politician has in memory. All of which is routinely IGNORED by the liberal media while they try to “demonize” him to death. (Flag and Cross)

Ilegal Gun Kills Child

Anti-gun fools are making a big thing out of a fatal shooting of a child through the negligence of his mother's boyfriend in storing his gun, according to CBS News. Her boyfriend negligently allowed his gun to be picked up by the child, who subsequently fatally shot himself. They, as usual, whine about the gun not being properly stored, but that's not even the question. The boyfriend was ON PROBATION for a previous crime, and shouldn't have had a gun, in the first place! But he did, meaning he owned the gun illegally, and, since he could not buy a gun legally, BOUGHT the gun illegally, or stole it. That's TWO CRIMES he committed, just in his ownership of that gun! It's the usual failure of “gun laws” that depend on CRIMINALS, who are lawbreakers by definition, to OBEY their laws, rather than make laws that discourage criminals from owning OR using a gun illegally because of “draconian” punishment for that usage--something a criminal cannot ignore. Depending on lawbreakers to obey their laws is the fatal flaw in current anti-gun laws, but the anti-gun fools who make the laws will not admit it, nor change the direction of their laws. If they ever made such a law, I'd be right with them. But I'm not holding my breath. Turning blue doesn't suit me. (CBS News)

"Above the Law?"

Dumocrats constantly ask if President Trump is “above the law,” but never have anything to say about their own “investigators” being “above the law.” The Constitution says that the accused may never be questioned without their lawyer being present to advise them if they ask for it, and must be advised (correctly) of their rights BEFORE any questioning. Any “evidence” obtained from them after they ask for a lawyer is inadmissible unless a lawyer is allowed, and PROVIDED if they cannot afford it. Why then, can the FBI place somebody in a room by him/herself, WITHOUT a lawyer, with eight Trump-hating FBI agents shouting inane questions from all directions? And why can they jump on a simple lack of perfect memory and call it a lie? Something for which the “accused” can be imprisoned? All this in perfect VIOLATION of the Constitution? Why can they intimidate Trump people time after time, “questioning” them for hour after hour, with the questioners working in “shifts” (so s not to tire them out), and not allowing the “subject” any rest periods or even bathroom breaks? All this with NO “probable cause” to believe there is ANY laws broken? Why is the Congress and the FBI “above the law” in their tactics while being able to charge those “subjects” with serious crimes if they show the slightest hesitation to “cooperate?” (Just common sense)

They Aren't Satisfied

Liberals must have not won as many court cases that they have filed to screw up what President Trump is trying to do. So now they want to “move the goalposts” again. The last time they tried it, they failed, miserably. That was in FDR’s time. This time they might succeed, because they are in control of way more basic things than they were, then. They also want to get rid of the Electoral College so it’s easier to “fix” a presidential election. They know they have do do SOMETHING to stop Trump before he “burns their house down.” The problem they face is that President Trump has promised to “drain the swamp,” and he is actually DOING it. He has got a good start on unearthing their corruption they’ve been guilty of, for years. And he has accomplished many things thy have promised, but never delivered. Such as improving an economy to record highs that Obama swore was “gone forever,” and would never be back. Causing the unemployment numbers to go down to record lows. Waving what Obama called “his magic wand” and bringing back the millions of jobs Obama also declared “gone forever.” He has caused the world (except the swamp, of course) to respect this country again, and to fear our displeasure. That’s just a short list of his accomplishments that the liberal media has refused to report, but knowledge of which has “slipped out” through the “alternative media.” (Legal Insurrection)

Stopping Pro-Gun Meetings

In New York, they want to stop pro-gun folks from even having MEETINGS to discuss the useless "gun rights controversy." By so doing, they hope to cripple our defenses to their silly laws by taking away our tight to even have MEETINGS about it. Of course, to do so is a violation of the Constitution, but liberals just IGNORE that "august document" when it limits their dictatorial powers over the rest of us. Any law such as this will ultimately (hopefully) be declared unconstitutional, but not until it has been enforced for a time, and the damage has been done. New York State is the place where stupid liberals gather, and they really think they can make such laws without consequences. If the "Founders" had made the making, or even PROPOSING of such laws a punishable offense, such stupid politicians would not be able to make such stupid laws in the first place. It pains me to think there are even enough stupid liberals in existence to populate states like New York, and extend their stupidities to the Congress in the senators and representatives they send there. (Reason Magazine)

Obama's "Recovery"

It really amuses me to hear liberals tell us that President Trump is merely taking credit for a boom that “started under Obama,” and continues to this day. What a LOAD of bullsh-t! Obama’s policies resulted in millions of unemployed, most of whom actually gave up on ever finding another job again in their lives. People were forced to find two or more part-time jobs (if they could) just to make ends meet. Obama confidently assured us that this is what we were going to have to get used to, that those jobs were “never coming back.” that “our best days were behind us,” and we’d better get used to it. That we would never again achieve an unemployment level below 4%. Meanwhile he sent billions of dollars to countries that hated our guts. He gave up on ever getting Kim Jong Stupid to the negotiating table. So Trump was elected, and he went to work. The unemployment is now at record level lows, and employers are having trouble finding employees to do the available jobs. Jobs are coming back from overseas. The economy is at record highs, that started in that direction after Trump’s policies took effect. Dumocrats talk about “the coming recession,” but nobody (who matters) can see any indications in that direction. Obama’s “recovery” is a MYTH Dumocrats tell so they can get back in power and fleece the nation again. (Just common sense)