Sunday, May 31, 2015
They're insane to even ACCEPT some of the things their leaders expect them to believe—but they do, on a regular basis. Some say insanity is doing the same things over and over and expecting a different result. But that's just the RESULT of their insanity. Insanity is really being completely separated from reality, like the guy who thinks he's Napoleon and is planning his return to power. Or the woman who thinks she's Gaia and is therefore a divine person. But there are other forms of insanity, and liberals are an example of MASS insanity. “Here in America, the madness of crowds is upon us. The Left has so suppressed the knowledge of reality and has so affixed itself to delusion that the crowds who comprise it and who follow it would have been straitjacketed a decade or two ago.” (American Thinker) That being said, I believe it would have been needed for longer than that. The things they say and believe amaze me. Like saying “logic and reason” do not exist.” And believing it! “Logically. Stands to reason.” (American Thinker)
It's only a small distance from ALLOWING the murder of unborn, defenseless babies to REQUIRING it. And that's being proved in Sweden, where they now want to REQUIRE abortions on government orders. Obama wants to REQUIRE people to pay into a fund to finance the murder of infants here in America, which is much the same thing. It hasn't been made law yet, but it's what our “illustrious president” (damned fool) wants. Frankly, if I were ordered to pay into such a “fund,” I would tell them to do a “reverse birth,” using whatever orifice is available. When I was born, I would not have believed that infanticide would someday become “the law of the land,” and that people who are AGAINST killing babies would be ostracized and prosecuted for it. Society is going absolutely BONKERS! (World Net Daily)
The Constitution doesn't allow them to simply BAN guns, so they make many laws to put as many obstacles in the way of gun ownership as possible. Now they want to REQUIRE gun buyers to buy expensive liability insurance before they can buy a gun, with those who don't being subject to a $10,000.00 fine. Of course, the constitutional ban on “cruel or unusual punishment” doesn't apply, either. Rep. Carole Maloney (D-of course-NY, again of course) introduced legislation to do just that. It's as if people can't be liable for injuries to others if they don't have guns. She compares gun buying to buying a car, and the analogy just doesn't work. You don't buy a car for self-defense. And with such insurance, it opens the way for much more litigation as criminals who get shot by their intended victims sue the people who shoot them, This law does NOTHING to prevent that. Naturally, she completely ignores the fact that CRIMINALS, who don't obey laws, will not obey this one, either. (Breitbart)
Saturday, May 30, 2015
By refusing to even UTTER the words, “Islamic terrorist,” he is ENABLING Islamic terrorism all over the world. And everything he does to HELP them bring their atrocities to the United States is terrorism, itself. He is a TRAITOR to this country. He has a program running to bring 75,000 Islamic “refugees” to this country. How many of those “refugees” are Islamic terrorists in disguise, coming here to set up their secret “cells” and get ready to kill, maim, rape, and behead innocent people as they have done elsewhere? When Islamic terrorists commit their atrocities, he calls it by another name, such as “:workplace violence” in the case of Ft. Hood, where a self-described Jihadist murdered several people and SAID he “did it for my Islamic people.” Obama needs to be gotten rid of, in whatever way necessary, short of killing him. He needs to be arrested, imprisoned, and otherwise punished for his activities IN SUPPORT of the Islamic Jihad. Not by impeachment. He has too many powerful friends for that to work. (American Thinker)
Baltimore, MD residents aren't so sure they want their cops GONE any more, after murders rose 100% and arrests WENT DOWN 50% Now they're begging the cops to “do more.” Well, what do they WANT? The cops to be GONE or DO MORE? They can't seem to make up their minds, can they? I think they're finally finding out what we already knew: that without the cops standing between us and the savages, they're defenseless, since Obama and the gang have, for the most part, effectively DISARMED them. But not the crooks, who get their guns illegally and carry them illegally. They don't care about restrictive gun laws. Actually, they LIKE it that way because they can be pretty sure their intended victims won't be armed. (The Blaze)
Declaring war on the cops is probably the biggest mistakes liberals have ever made. They're creating a “self-fulfilling prophecy.” They accuse cops of wantonly killing unarmed blacks when they're not doing anything of the sort—as a group. Now, the cops will spend more time looking over their shoulders than they do finding and helping punish criminals, and they WILL become “trigger happy” in self defense. Yes, there are a few “bad guys” among them, but as a whole, cops do a hard, thankless job, and they mostly do it well. There are cops killed every day in America, but except for local coverage, you never hear about them. One of the most recent was a female cop, the day before she was to take maternity leave. Another was a CADET who hadn't even had a chance yet to BE a cop, who saved a man's life and was killed doing it.
These are the stories you don't hear about because the media seems to have a certain enmity for the cops. And they're taking a cue from Obama's nasty rhetoric about cops. Whenever a cop does something wrong—or APPEARS to do something wrong, they have a “field day” with it and cause riots, looting, and a killing spree. But when a COP dies, they're not interested. They're right: “Black Lives Do Matter.” But ALL lives matter. And cops are the only thing we have between us and the savages; moreso as more and more laws get made to disarm the populace. The feds aren't satisfied with the result in the Cleveland case, where the prosecution failed to prove that cop's bullet was the fatal one. So they're going to “further investigate” it and come up (again) with a “report” condemning the entire police force, accusing them of systemic racism, so Obama can take control of yet another local police force in his quest to control ALL local policing. (The Blaze)
Friday, May 29, 2015
It must be a tizzy, rivaling the one he had when it was revealed that the globe had NOT been “warming” for more than 15 years, which caused him to have to change the name of his swindle to “climate change,” a term sufficiently “neutral” he could still use it since the globe was NOT warming to con people out of more millions. So imagine his dismay when it was found that, not only was the globe NOT warming, it was COOLING. Like it was just before it started “warming” more than fifteen years ago. I'm an old man. I was around when they were worried about “the coming ice age” as the world COOLED. I remember a many page article in Time Magazine detailing the “science” behind “global cooling.” Then, silence for a while, before AlGore started his global WARMING din. It must really be hard on Gore when the world just doesn't cooperate, and goes right on warming and cooling in CYCLES as it always has done, since long before any of us were born. (Daily Caller)
I'm sure you've heard about the measure being introduced in Los Angeles to raise the minimum wage to $15.00 per hour. A measure pushed HARD by the unions and supported by the mayor. Well, the unions want no part of the measure they promoted so hard for US. They want to be “excused” from being forced to make their members abide by that law. Apparently they think only non-union members should have to obey that law. Which reveals what I've always known about such laws. They only want them for OTHERS, not themselves. When the law costs jobs, they don't want them to be theirs. (News Busters)
The “chickens are coming home to roost” in Baltimore after the “powers that be” turned against their cops. Homicides are up 155% and arrests are DOWN 50%. Are the cops “laying off” in response to the top politicians turning against them ? I don't know. All I know is that if I were a cop in Baltimore right now, I'd be more concerned with protecting my own rear end than that of those ungrateful citizens who think I ought to be “offed.” I would be very careful what arrests I DID make, lest Marilyn charge me with something. It's a damned sure thing the actions of the Baltimore politicians have put a “kitk” in policing in Baltimore. It's understandable that response time in black areas is slow. Cops know they're "Targets" there like nowhere else. I'd be slow in going in there, too, with the leadership they've got. (Rage and War)
Thursday, May 28, 2015
I'm going to use the word “thug” everywhere it is appropriate, even if the PC Police don't like it. They can go screw themselves. Nobody tells me what words to use. Ever. Thugs (white and black) are mad because they couldn't get a cop convicted in the killing of other thugs to satisfy the mob. So they're going around pepper spraying people in restaurants. People who are doing NOTHING to oppose them. People at RANDOM. And they think there's nothing in what they do to make cops want to arrest them? What a bunch of damfools they are! I often wonder who black people call when other blacks (and whites) victimize them. That the cops take longer to get there in black neighborhoods is a common complaint. I know that's a problem, but it's one they brought on themselves. The cops are slow to respond in black neighborhoods because it's there they are the most likely to be shot and killed from ambush. That's not a racist observation, It's common sense, based on reality. (Rage and War)
That's the actual headline in a liberal media source recently after the “big shootout” between motorcycle gang members and the cops in Texas. No, they kill each other in other ways: mostly with knives and heavy chains, which can't be easily defined as weapons until used as such. And therein lies the fallacy in ALL “gun control legislation.” It assumes that if people don't have guns, they won't kill and maim each other. Nothing could be further from the truth. If guns didn't exist, they'd find other ways to kill each other—and these people have. Which is why “Gun violence Is Rare” among them. That headline is misleading, as it assumes that the lack of GUN violence is a lack of all kinds OF VIOLENCE. It isn't. Way back when, all men carried swords, and when they wanted to kill each other, they used their swords. Notice in this case, the guns didn't come out until the cops arrived with THEIR guns. (10 News)
Obama wants to emulate Jamaica in its handling of “the gun issue.” So do all the other anti-gun fools. Some time ago they had such a problem with violence in Jamaica, gun violence and otherwise, that you took your life in your hands if you went to the grocery store if you were white or “beige.” The government spewed so much white hatred that a white man couldn't walk down the street without taking a chance on being shot or killed in another way. So they decided to DISARM the whole country. They decreed that ALL guns and bullets should be “turned over” to the government unless they were government-owned, or in the hands of the cops. Then the only people to fear were the cops or “government agents,” who were known for their white hatred and were not above PLANTING guns so they could send people to what amounts to a “concentration camp.” “So there we all were - government-disarmed, sitting-duck, law-abiding citizens and expatriates. Anyone can guess what happened next: the rampant and unfettered carnage began in earnest.
“Robberies, kidnappings, murders, burglaries, rapes - all committed by the vast populace of still-armed criminals. Doubtless the criminals were positively ecstatic that the government had been so helpful in creating all these juicy and utterly defenseless victims for their easy prey.” That's the basic fallacy in today's “anti-gun laws.” The CRIMINALS remain armed. Because they don't OBEY laws. They CREATED a lawless society of criminals who KNEW their potential victims were most likely disarmed, and naturally “went wild,” running around in pickup trucksful oif thugs, who picked houses at random, breaking in and raping, robbing them, and sometimes killing them. All this because the government DISARMED the honest people who DID obey laws. That's what Obama and his crowd want for America, Make no mistake. That's what he's working toward. We have to STOP HIM. (Varmit Al)
Wednesday, May 27, 2015
When trying to get elected, Obama said many times, that electing him would “forever destroy bigotry and racism in the United States.” It has done nothing of the sort. In fact, it has done just the opposite, creating (with Obama's help) Ferguson MO and Baltimore, MD riots and looting and the killings of many police officers, white and black, plus rampant black hatred of whites, right out in the open. Even one of the top black activists say they'd have been better off with a white president: Media mogul and Entertainment Studios CEO Byron Allen unloaded on President Barack Obama over the weekend for not acting black enough. “President Obama is, at this point, a white president in black face.” Allen, who is black, told TMZ “Black America would have done much better with a white president. You have let us down tremendously.” he continued. (Daily Caller)
A New Orleans Housing Authority cop was shot and killed in his squad car. Will there be riots? Looting? Fires? Will the national media even NOTICE? Probably not, Because it's a COP who was killed, not a young, unarmed, black male. The liberal media is so predictable I feel quite confident in saying I do not expect to see much about this in anything BUT the New Orleans media—and not much, there. Because a COP getting shot and killed doesn't do ANYTHING to advance Obama's wish for a black hates white race war. And Obama cares not for a cop dying unless it supports his plans. It pains me to watch the liberal media work to help Obama advance his plans. It's plain what they're doing, but they do it, anyway. It's like they don't care that we know it. (Fox News)
One of the “ladies” from “Moms Against Guns (or some such) LIED to the Texas Senate when she tried to convince them her son killed his dad with a gun. Actually, he killed him with a pipe wrench and a knife. But truth apparently means nothing to these people. The lies they tell all the time mostly go unnoticed by many people. Maybe their next target will be pipe wrenches and knives. She also played up the fact that her son “had an arsenal” of guns, which had NO BEARING on his killing his father. All members of this group who testified were obviously reading from a prepared script given them by Bloomberg. It even had blank, underlined spaces for their individual names, some of which had their names handwritten in the space. Maybe they needed it to remember who they were. (Breitbart)
Tuesday, May 26, 2015
This is something many people won't want to believe, but if there is ANY chance it's true, many Muslim men need to be taken off the street and “put away.” They're “members” of “rape gangs” who prey on young girls (mostly in group homes), taking them out to repeatedly rape them. And they do this with the COOPERATION of the people who run those homes and the INDIFFERENCE of the police. This is mostly happening in Britain, but with the way American “authorities” kowtow to Muslims, I wouldn't be surprised to see it here, soon. They report it to the cops, but the cops seem to be in favor of ALLOWING it, and do everything they can to stop anything from happening to these Muslim rapists, who say this is “okay in my culture.” Is it? If so, their “culture” needs to be destroyed. (World Net Daily)
Suspicions confirmed. PAID demonstrators in Ferguson, MO, haven't been paid for coming there and looting. So they staged a sit-in at the offices of “Missourians for Reform Now (ACORN)”, demanding their money. They HAD been paying protesters $5,000.00 per month to demonstrate (presumably plus what they could steal). Recently, they stopped. Maybe they ran out of money. Other protesters with the “Black Lives Matter” movement also had a sit-in at their offices. Anybody who thinks ACORN is “dead” needs to “wake up and smell the tulips.” They just did what all liberal groups do when their crimes are found out. They reorganized and are now operating under a different name (or names). But don't think for a MINUTE they've “gone away.” George Soros is the “money man” behind these “demonstrators,” and apparently he figures it's time to stop paying the demonstrators in Ferguson, since things have “quieted down” because nothing has happened recently and they can't make murder charges stick against that cop. (Tea Party News Network)
Obama can't just BAN guns. So he does the next best thing: he makes them useless. Without bullets, all they are is inefficient clubs. Bullets aren't protected by the Constitution, so he can do what he wants with them. So he's starting the process of banning them by first, forcing people to “register” them. If he's successful, every bullet you buy will have to be registered in your name, It won't stop you from killing anybody, but it WILL make sure you get caught when you do—unless you can find a way to negate the registration, something I'm sure criminals will find a way to accomplish, probably before the requirement becomes law (If it does). Meanwhile, people will continue to die as a market for illicit ammunition grows, and the cost of bullets goes sky high so criminals can go on committing their violent crimes with seeming impunity. And if Obama thinks criminals can't find a way around his “registration” of ammunition, he's delusional. Meanwhile, nothing gets done to reduce gun violence and the government, as usual, spends a lot of money making it LOOK like they're doing something real when they're not. (Right to Bear)
Monday, May 25, 2015
People from all over the world came to America to escape slavery, intimidation, tyranny, and murder. They come here in droves because this is (so far) the last place on Earth that is really free and where they can realize “the American dream” without having to “bow down” to royalty or bureaucracy, or a dictator. Where the INDIVIDUAL is sovereign, has the right to say and DO what he/she wishes without governmental opposition, so long as to do so does not interfere with the rights of others to do likewise. Those rights lasted nearly 300 years with this country being the destination of choice for those who just wanted to be left alone to live their lives successfully without having to pay tribute to those to whom nothing is owed. But all that is unraveling as liberals work diligently to destroy it. This country has always been the “destination of choice” for those who only wanted FREEDOM. One day soon, if liberals are allowed to continue their dirty work, there will no longer BE anywhere for Americans to flee, to stay free. (World Net Daily)
She says she WANTS us to see them. The ones SHE selects, anyway. She CLAIMS all those she DELETED were “personal.” But unless there's a way to recover the ones she deleted, we'll never know. And that's the way she wants it. That's why she used her own PRIVATE e-mail service, based in her basement, so she could control ABSOLUTELY what e-mails she showed us. That tells me she KNEW that some day Congress would want to see her “official” e-mails, and she wanted to be SURE she could have absolute CONTROL over what they saw so they would never have proof of any of her many scandals. That shows premeditation, and should, by itself, merit a PRISON sentence for deleting government property. (American Thinker)
Iowa Democrats were recently asked to name ONE Hillary Clinton accomplishment, and they couldn't. Yet she's the “front-runner” in the current race for the Democrat presidential nomination. If that doesn't illustrate the abysmal STUPIDITY of the Democrats, I don't know what does. I don't mean ignorance. I mean STUPIDITY. Ignorance is a simple lack of information. Stupidity is when you HAVE information but still act stupidly. And Iowa Democrats have certainly taken stupid pills. If Hillary has no accomplishments, and a “mixed bag” of scandals yet unresolved while she “stonewalls” them, how STUPID is it to still want her for president? Or for ANY office? (The American Spectator)
Sunday, May 24, 2015
There is no better illustration of liberal stupidity than people who criticize a judge for refusing to “sacrifice a cop” to public sentiment, and convict him of manslaughter, just to please the crowd in Cleveland, Ohio. He was one of MANY cops who were shooting at two men who led them on a “merry chase” and got themselves killed, was stupidly charged with manslaughter in the case. When a judge refused to “sacrifice him” to the wishes of the crowd, in spite of his possible INNOCENCE, he was criticized for it. If he had, it would have been an instance of liberalism out of control. I'd say, yes, the cops overreacted excessively in firing 137 times into the car after it stopped, and INVESTIGATING that cop IF his gun was found to have fired the fatal shot was required. But he was NOT ALONE, and “sacrificing” him was not, in any way, called for.
He didn't need to take the full brunt of the reaction. And those people in that car bear some of the blame, too. If they hadn't run for 22 miles in a chase that involved 100 cops, it wouldn't have come down to a killing. And the cops DID think somebody in the car was armed. It was impossible NOT to under the circumstances. It's all a product of the “Kill Cops” movement. He was found NOT GUILTY of manslaughter, but still faces departmental charges, so he will not go unpunished, even if the department advises no punishment. Being TWICE forced to wait to find out his fate while not getting paid IS punishment. Manslaughter and a prison term is way too much punishment under the circumstances. He is not without blame, but let's keep it fair. The shooting prompted a federal investigation (surprise, surprise!) and they decided the Cleveland cops showed a “pattern of excessive use of force and violation of people's civil rights.” Surprise, again! One more city under federal control. (The Blaze)
But they won't tell us what they are. The details are “classified.” And the Republicans are ALLOWING it! The REPUBLICANS! The ones who were SUPPOSED to be “reining in” Obama and his excesses! If we can't count on the REPUBLICANS to put a stop to Obama's excesses, we're LOST. He is in the process of “giving away the store,” and there seems to be nothing we can do about it because the people who CAN are “asleep at the wheel.” It's called, “Trade Promotion Authority, and 48 Republicans and only 14 Democrats voted for it. But the most disturbing thing about it is the details are “CLASSIFIED.” That means Obama can COMMIT us to things we don't even KNOW about. (Washington Post)
Why are we even CONSIDERING Hillary Clinton to be president? Because she's a DEMOCRAT, that's why! Criminal acts mean NOTHING to them when they “pick” a possible presidential candidate, She has too many scandals piling up to even COUNT, rather than detail. She has PROVABLY lied so many times, and in so many ways, she's rivaling the lies told by her hubby and her mentor, Barack Obama. Yet that doesn't seem to affect her standing in the liberal media polls. They don't care how corrupt and dishonest she is, or how many lies she tells. They've promised her that THIS TIME the presidency is HERS. And they're determined to get it for her, by “hook or crook.” If she doesn't win the election, they'll STEAL it for her, as they did TWICE for Obama. (Fox News)
Saturday, May 23, 2015
In the fifty years since Lyndon Johnson's “War on Poverty” began, we've spent $22 TRILLION (in inflation adjusted dollars) and have made NO HEADWAY in improving the “poverty” picture. Can that be? Can our politicians be so incompetent that they spend $22 TRILLION dollars and accomplish NOTHING? Absolutely! The thing they're good at is spending money, not keeping track of HOW it is spent. Just as in the “war on drugs,” after all the money is spent, NOTHING has been accomplished. The same number of people are still “in poverty” or doing drugs as there were before they started your “big plans.” This is why I say our politicians are INCOMPETENT. Because all their “big plans” ALWAYS come to naught, after spending TRILLIONS of our dollars. (American Thinker)
That's what Gov. Bobby Jindal of Louisiana, says. Of course, the “gay lobby” will disagree and call him a bigot as he issues his executive order to ensure people would NOT lose their licenses in his state for refusing to do business with gays. But he's right. It's NOT about discrimination. Gay marriage is a CHOICE, not a right. Religious rights ARE a right, and are enforceable. That's not arguable—but gays WILL argue it. Where the hell do they get such chutzpa? I'm not saying it should be ILLEGAL to be gay, but it shouldn't be illegal to be morally against being gay, either. It's THEIR CHOICE to be gay, and it's not too smart to declare it to the world by “getting married.” I have nothing against what gays do, but I will NOT be forced to APPROVE it by calling their “contracts” marriage. They can have all the “marriage-like” contracts they wish, and I have no problem with that. But I will not accept them as “marriage.” (The Patriot Post)
It makes me physically ill to see troops that are supposed to be on our side RUNNING from the enemy as they come to take back what American soldiers DIED to take. It was an amazing picture to watch Iraq soldiers FLEEING in the trucks and helicopters WE gave them, to save their own asses at the cost of other innocent lives. Now people are dying in Ramadi while they rest, far away. Their action could have been predicted when Obama gave the order for OUR troops to “cut and run” from Iraq without finishing the job. Finishing the job means KILLING every Islamic terrorist we could find, without mercy. It's the only thing they understand. Either we kill THEM, or they kill US.And if we don't kill them, they kill hundreds, even THOUSANDS of innocent civilians. The Iraq president says he will “take it back quickly,” but I seriously doubt it. To take it back would require some soldiers who are not cowards. And I don't think he has any to call on. (The Daily Mail)
Friday, May 22, 2015
I have nothing against blacks. I judge people as INDIVIDUALS. In a confrontation in a New York park, a militant black thug told a white man “You should be bowing down to me because I'm black. I judge this individual to be a FOOL. Black OR white.” I remember a time when a restaurant in NC called the COPS on me because they THOUGHT I was black and was trying to eat there. I'm not saying that was right, but how far would this black man have gotten with such arrogant blather there and then? He'd have been lynched! Obama has whipped up so much hatred among blacks for whites it doesn't matter that racism had almost “gone away” in this country. They ignore the fact that there are more black mayors, police chiefs, cops, governors, and senators on all levels than ever before. Even in the South. They're PRETENDING racism is rampant,and it is: black against white racism. and, after listening to Obama's rhetoric, they've gotten cocky. More cocky than white people EVER were. We're getting close to the race war Obama so dearly wishes because whites will soon stop taking the crap the blacks are handing out. He says we're all gonna die, and he's right. But all blacks are gonna die, too. So what? The biggest cause of death is BIRTH. Not all blacks are this stupid, and that's good. But those who are will inevitably influence those who are not. (Conservative Byte)
John Lennon's widow, Yoko Ono, who was NOBODY before she married him and is sponsoring art shows today with his money says she had “an affair” with Hillary back during the time she was married to John. Do you believe that? I don't. I've heard stories about Hillary being a lesbian before, but never before has anybody CLAIMED (in public) to be her lover. Yoko is as much of a “social climber” as Hillary is, so it IS possible. But I don't believe it, precisely because she said it in public. Ono says Hillary getting elected president will be a boon for the LGBT crowd, but it ain't agonna happen. She has way too many unresolved scandals in her suitcase. As to her being a lesbian? Who the hell cares? (World News Daily Report)
When the Clinton Crime Foundation reorganized as a result of Bill becoming president, somehow $17 million dollars went missing, the loss hidden in all the confusing “financial statements” that were filed. But will the Clintons be properly punished for “losing track” of that money? Not a chance. Just as with the $60 million “lost” by the State Department while she was Secretary of State, it will be “stonewalled” and “obfuscated” until it becomes “old news” that she will not discuss—and NOBODY will do anything important about it. Meanwhile, the Clintons are $77 million dollars richer, not even counting their combined “speaking fees.” It amazes me the way the Clintons go through life, breaking law after law, while the people who should be taking them to task slumber. (World NetDaily)
Thursday, May 21, 2015
Looking at his policies and beliefs, the easy answer would be “yes.” He has long insisted that the Islamic terrorists are “failing,” while a simple look at reality shows that they are WINNING. They now control HALF of Syria and parts of Libya and several other countries, and they're openly threatening to “raise the ISIS flag over the White House. He insists on NOT enforcing our border control laws while Islamic terrorists flow, unimpeded, right into this country, right alongside of Mexicans and other South Americans, to set up their secret cells and wait until the order comes to destroy something and kill some Americans. He's insisting on raising the minimum wage to stupid heights, even though anybody with any intelligence at all KNOWS doing so will make the unemployment picture worse. And speaking of that, everything he does makes unemployment worse.
He PROMOTES black racism against whites, hoping for a race war so he can use it to take more power. He works HARD to DISARM Americans so when (not IF) the Islamic terrorists get here and start doing in our streets what they do elsewhere, there will be fewer guns to oppose them (In theory, anyway. The crooks will still have them.). He is now pushing global warming, a swindle that is KNOWN to be a swindle that has made AlGore a billionaire.His foreign policy is a mess. He is on the brink of AGREEING to allow Iran to get nuclear capability and is giving them BILLIONS of our dollars to help finance it. But I don't think he's stupid. I think he has a definite purpose in what he does. Unlike any other president in memory, I think he HATES America and WANTS to destroy it. Making us think he's stupid is his cover. (Just common sense)
That's what the Sheriff claimed after he and his men threw a “flash-bang grenade” into a house, that landed in a baby crib, which tore off the face of an eleven-month old child and almost burned him to death. They say that because they feel that the child's mere PRESENCE in that house when they raided it on the basis of a false warrant claiming a $50 drug sale had been made there—which had not happened (no evidence of lawbreaking was found in the raid) was “an attack” on officers (by a sleeping BABY!). They also threw his father down on the floor, breaking his “rotator cup,” and that was their fault, too. Everything was their fault. They made the mistake of seeking shelter from a known drug dealer (the cops knew, they didn't) when their own house burned down. According to the sheriff, they should have KNOWN they were subject to being “storm-troopered” by the local cops in the middle of the night, and thus the sheriff is completely blameless, It makes me sick to read about this kind of thing because it should not be happening in America. But it is happening way too often today, which feeds the Cop hatred that is being PROMOTED by Obama and his goons so he can “take them over.” This sheriff and his goons need to be “taken down” and REMOVED.They are completely devoid of common sense. (Personal Liberty)
He was running guns to the Syrian “rebels,” who are really Islamic terrorists, although he won't admit it publicly. He was running them before and after Benghazi, and that was probably the motivation behind the attack at Benghazi—which is why all the subterfuge surrounding Benghazi. I knew all this at the time. I didn't know the details, but I knew the “broad brush-strokes.” Now the press has “found out” and can no longer hide it. In a “perfect world,” this would END Obama. But this isn't a “perfect world.” Obama said the “rise of ISIS was a surprise, and that was a lie, too (Of course it was; he said it, didn't he?).
“A Defense Department document from the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA), dated September 12, 2012, the day after the Benghazi attack, details that the attack on the compound had been carefully planned by the BOCAR terrorist group "to kill as many Americans as possible." The document was sent to then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, then-Defense Secretary Leon Panetta, the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the Obama White House National Security Council. The heavily redacted Defense Department "information report" says that the attack on the Benghazi facility "was planned and executed by The Brigades of the Captive Omar Abdul Rahman (BCOAR)." The group subscribes to "AQ ideologies:" I got a hint for ya. See how many liberal media sources give this more than a few seconds of air time. (Eagle Rising)
Wednesday, May 20, 2015
It amazes me how liberals can be so impervious to reason. We tell them and tell them that wages in big business (and small) are set at a point where they can AFFORD to pay them and still make money. There's a limit on how much they can CHARGE, and thus a limit on how much they can PAY. If they can't pay, those jobs will GO AWAY. It's better to be employed at slightly less than you'd like than not employed at all. I've been that way all my life, but I've lived a good life. If I'd have told my employer to pay me a LOT more than I was worth (and made it stick), he'd tell me “bye, bye.”:He needs me, but not as much as I needed him. They're finding that out in Seattle, where the city mandated $15 an hour minimum wage. Businesses that have been around for years are closing, or moving elsewhere. If you want to destroy business, that's the way to go. It seems like EVERYTHING liberals insist on work that way. (Forbes)
Let honest people carry guns and crime goes down. This has been proven over and over, yet the gullible politicians still refuse to believe it. Apparently, they're “stuck on stupid.” Chicago is one of the worst places to live anywhere, because they have some of the tightest gun laws anywhere. Recently, a judge forced them to allow more people to carry guns and they did. And crime went down 20%. Surprise, surprise! In the first quarter of this year, homicides are down 56%. Whoda thunkit? "It isn't any coincidence crime rates started to go down when concealed carry was permitted. “Just the idea that the criminals don't know who's armed and who isn't has a deterrence effect," said Richard Pearson, executive director of the Illinois State Rifle Association. "The police department hasn't changed a single tactic — they haven't announced a shift in policy or of course — and yet you have these incredible numbers." And yet the politicians still insist on making their USELESS “gun laws” that do nothing but make the crime state WORSE. (WashingtonTimes)
Jeb Bush answered the wrong question when asked a “gotcha” question about whether or not he would have gone into Iraq, knowing what he knows now. But he answered it as if the questioner had asked if he would, NOT based on what we now know. In either case, my answer would be, YES. Saddam was a KNOWN Islamic terrorist SUPPORTER, and thus a LEGITIMATE TARGET. No, we didn't find large stores of “weapons of mass destruction” there, and that is not surprising since we “dithered” publicly for ELEVEN MONTHS on whether or not to invade before we did. He had plenty of time to ship them to Syria so we COULDN'T find them. He probably thought he'd escape punishment if we couldn't find them. WRONG! He got his neck stretched, anyway. But the fact remains invading Iraq WAS a good idea. When Obama pulled out, it was an “engraved invitation” for SOMEBODY to come in and take it back over. And ISIS (whatever their name is) was ready and waiting to do that. So now we've lost all the things people DIED to achieve there because Obama RUSHED to “cut and run.” (Press TV)
Tuesday, May 19, 2015
That's how liberals get out of admitting the things they do. They just call it something else. Most notably recently, their effort to call anyone who uses the word “thug” of being racist. “Other “ 'progressive' doublespeak includes words like 'invest' (meaning socialist redistribution of wealth), 'tolerance' (meaning embrace immorality or face total ruin), 'diversity' (meaning Christians and conservatives need not apply), 'hate' (meaning truth) or “The Affordable Care Act” (meaning unaffordable, unsustainable and utterly inferior socialized medicine). Now Obama talks about FORCING the media to “change the way they report things (as if they needed to, in order to help him along).” Which, translated, means, “You MUST obey me. I have the power. " (Just common sense)
Gay marriage is NOT a “constitutional right.” Being gay might be nobody's business but your own, but nowhere in the Constitution does it recognize your RIGHT to be gay. Thus, there is no legal basis for militant gays running around to bakeries and DEMANDING they bake cakes for gay weddings then RUINING them when they refuse. They can ALWAYS go to another bakery. They are NOT “blocked” from getting that cake by the refusal of ONE bakery to do it. This refusal does NOTHING to inhibit their lifestyle. Meanwhile, the bakeries are backed by an UNDENIABLE constitutional RIGHT to practice their religion as they see fit, which somehow, everybody ignores—and that includes the right to REFUSE to do business with ANYBODY if to do so violates the tenets of their religious faith. Any “rights” the gays claim are SPECIOUS (phony), anyway. Whereby the rights claimed by religious people are REAL and enforceable (IF somebody would ENFORCE them). Any action against them for PRACTICING their rights are AGAINST THE LAW. This has nothing to do with their “right to be gay.” I have nothing personal against what they do in the privacy of their bedrooms. But when they try and FORCE it on me, I DO. (NewsMax)
I've often said politicians are incompetent. They have proven me correct by the things they do in running our country. There isn't an economy run by a politician that is not broke. Some because they just have no idea how to handle money, and others because the politicians have stolen too much of it. And yes, bureaucrats do most of the actual running of it. But the fact is, bureaucrats are politicians, too. They just don't have to get elected, just appointed BY those who DO get elected. And their “terms” are longer, or shorter, depending on whether or not their appointers get caught. This particular politician is so stupid he can't even tell a believable lie. He hems and haws and tells different stories in the same paragraph. Sometimes in the same SENTENCE. First he said categorically that NSA did NOT spy on Americans. Then he said, “Yes, they did. But by accident.” How do you create the software that allows you to listen in on millions of people “by accident?” This man categorically LIED to Congress. Will he be punished for it? That depends on who his friends are, and how powerful they are. (Survival Joe)
Monday, May 18, 2015
Michael Moore is “fat and happy” in his palatial home paid for by his silly liberal ideas, most of which, if put into effect, would have ENDED us. Now he wants to “solve the police problem” that we don't have by releasing all the criminals from prison and DISARMING the cops. That would CERTAINLY cause a huge reduction in the number of LIVE cops out there. The ones the thugs didn't kill (with their illegal guns) would wisely go into other work, and we'd be left defenseless—unless the politicians let us carry our own guns or we became criminals by carrying illegally. Of course, they're never going to do that. They're too stupid. They keep doing the same things over and over and thinking it will work this time. Wait a minute: isn't that the definition of INSANITY? Frankly, I think the definition if insanity is LIBERAL. Their every idea is wrong, and they keep doing wrong things over and over. (Conservatives United)
Comprehensive HS in York, South Carolina got a complaint, (Most likely from a Muslim) about the flags this student was carrying in his pickup and had done for more than a year. So the told him he'd have to “put them away” because they had “received a complaint.” In AMERICA, they got a complaint about flying the AMERICAN flag, and told him to “take it down.” They first said it was because someone was “offended” by it. Then they changed their story and said it was a “safety hazard” (Are they the cops. Or what?) . Before Obama and the rest of his liberal cronies got in power, such a thing would be impossible. Of course, the school “confiscated” (stole) the flags while he was in class. Being a “good southern boy,” he isn't taking this lying down, since he and members of his family have served this country with distinction. So he, his parents, and a LOT of other people, mostly war veterans, staged a demonstration outside the school, whereupon the school immediately caved, and said he “could fly his flags is he wantsta.” (Last Resistance)
That's what some school “officials” seem to think, anyway. In Pennsylvania, they told parents that they did not allow family vacation time as “an excused absence” and could refer them and their kids to the COPS for violation of the “compulsory attendance law.” How STUPID are they? Those PARENTS are in COMPLETE CONTROL of their children, no matter what those ignorant “officials” think. Somebody needs to straighten them out, and fast, before they are “hoist on their own petard.” Oops, too late! School “officials” and CPS “officials” are well known for exceeding their authority, and here they have plainly done that. I don't know what motivates such people, but it must be their overblown opinion of their own importance. (Preserve Freedom)
Sunday, May 17, 2015
Some guy flubbed his dub and ran over a roadside transformer on the freeway and took it out. It took them almost 24 hours to find another one and get here, and it installed and working. Meanwhile we just suffered while they made numerous promises about when it would come back on, all of them wrong.The power went out at about 3 PM Friday and back on (for the last time) about 2 PM Saturday. It went on and off three times before finally coming on and staying on. The outage not only caused me not to be able to use the computer, it took me off the WiFi so I couldn't post anything.; Sorry, folks.
One of the problems we have today is ignorant actresses who know nothing about anything, but pretend to tell us what to do because ignorant people ;LISTEN to them because “they're famuss!” The latest entry in this is Susan Sharandon, who knows exactly NOTHING about either politics or economics, but who blames Ronald Reagan for “the poor.” As if he CREATED them. What she doesn't know (and never would realize) is that DEMOCRATS have been almost EXCLUSIVELY in charge during the last fifty years, on all levels. They're not much good at GOVERNING, but they're experts at “getting elected” in spite of the fact that their policies don't work, and have NEVER WORKED. Therefore she “bad-mouths” a good man who actually SOLVED many of the problems CAUSED by Democrats over the years. Another example of this is Cheryl Crowe, who says we should be limited to ONE SQUARE of toilet paper each time we “wipe.” The fact that this does not work is completely lost on her, and I'd hesitate to shake her hand, any time, if that's how she does it. (The Guardian)
I have to give Democrats credit. they actually CREATED a bunch of jobs. They didn't plan it that way, and I'm sure they hate it. It happened this way: “The total economic impact of the firearms and ammunition industry in the United States increased from $19.1 billion in 2008 to $42.9 billion in 2014, a 125 percent increase, while the total number of full-time equivalent jobs* rose from approximately 166,000 to more than 263,000, a 58 percent increase in that period, according to a new report released today by the National Shooting Sports Foundation, the industry’s trade association.” Up 58%! That's a BIG number, and the Democrats and their anti-gun efforts are responsible! I'll bet they didn't see THAT coming! I've always said if the Democrats ever did anything GOOD, I'd be the first to give them credit for it. And here it is. They didn't PLAN it that way, it just happened. But they made it happen, anyway, and for that I congratulate them. (Daily Caller)
The United Nations should not be given the right to “judge” Americans in ANYTHING. But Obama is getting ready to give them that power to “sit in judgment” on our human rights record. An organization MADE UP of human rights violators “sitting in judgment” on OUR human rights record! That's like asking the FOX to “sit in judgment” on the movements of the chickens in the coop! How stupid IS Obama? To give an organization NOT governed by the Constitution, while themselves guilty of human rights violations the right to judge US? Among the “bones of contention” are “police shootings of black men” and “NOT closing GUANTANAMO." Since when is closing our holding prison for war criminals a subject we need to give the UN the power to question? I still think we should just SHOOT them when we catch them in the act, instead of sending them to GITMO, which only gives them a reason to raise questions, which ignorant liberals jump all over. (Minuteman News)
Friday, May 15, 2015
A black Democrat sheriff is now saying what I've been saying for a long time: Milwaukee's black, Democrat Sheriff David A. Clark is now openly saying, “President Obama is fueling racial tensions between African-Americans and the police to justify a federal takeover of local law enforcement.” And, as I've been saying, that's exactly what he's doing by taking little minor disagreements and blowing them way out of proportion, as he (and his cronies) have done) in Ferguson, MO. Yes, an unarmed teenager was shot and killed by a local cop. Witnesses lied, and said he was trying to surrender when shot, but he was not. Then they changed their story and said he was shot in the back, meaning he was running away. That was a lie, too, put out by his “homies” to incriminate that cop, who was just trying to stay alive while doing his duty against a huge MONSTER who didn't need a gun to be “armed. That “monster” was doing his best to KILL that cop.
Obama's lap-dog attorney general couldn't find any evidence to show the cop (who had to resign before the truth came out) did anything wrong, so he said the entire police force there was racist (also without providing any proof, only inference). Then, when six cops in Baltimore, MD were accused of murdering a black man who died after being in their custody, he did the same thing, with the help of a local prosecutor, who RAN to “indict” those six officers BEFORE the facts were in. I suspect it will be found that he died from complications from his earlier back surgery which were made worse by his fighting with the cops so soon after (which completely would absolve the cops, half of which were black). All this is being done to move us toward a race war, which would give Obama an excuse to “take over” local police forces and create a “national police force.” Meanwhile, he is doing his best to DISARM Americans so his thugs will not meet a loaded gun when they come to take what is ours. (Info Wars)
I've said it before and I'll say it again: Barack Obama and his “compliant” liberal media are working HARD to get a race war started by making the current “rebellion” against the cops a racial thing when it's NOT. He doesn't care that he will get some people killed in the process. The so-called “victims” are mostly black, yes. But many of the cops who are named are black, too. How does that make it a “black thing?” In Baltimore, HALF the cops the local state's attorney rushed out to charge with murder are black. How does that make it racism? The “victim” was a small-time crook with a long “sheet” (just like in Ferguson, MO) who had just had back surgery before he took up fighting with the cops. How does that make it that the cops MURDERED him?
It's like the stories about a man dying after a stun gun is used on him. The stun gun gets blamed for his death, not his propensity for fighting cops. Why is Obama trying to start a race war? He has been working toward that end since the very moment he took office. After promising that electing him would “forever end racism in America,” he set out to make everything from disagreeing with his policies to spitting on the sidewalk racism. He knows if he can get enough people on his side, he can make tighter laws and regulations than he could, otherwise—and that's what he's after. The most COMPLETE power he can manage. (Survival Joe)
Drudge is successful. He is outstripping all the “major news sources” in the WORLD in his importance. He is eminently successful. He is an ACHIEVER! Therefore, he MUST be destroyed, according to the liberal media. There is NO WAY he can be allowed to continue to make those rubes look so stupid, they say. Now they've even conned the feds into “taking over the FCC” (it wasn't too hard) so they could put “limits” on what he says, thus “muzzling” him. Ever since he exposed the fact that the liberal media “spiked” important stories because they might make the administration look bad, he has been increasing in influence, and the liberals hate that. To them, failure is success, and he must NOT be allowed to continue to make them look bad. The liberal media whines that Drudge “has no competitors,” but they can't really (honestly) do anything about that, so they turn to the liberal GOVERNMENT to “muzzle “ him. Limbaugh was right when he said, “The media is just now admitting they don't know how to equal Drudge, so they want to come up behind him and stab him in the back” (paraphrased, but accurate). (World Net Daily)
Thursday, May 14, 2015
The biggest problem today is not guns. It's not socialism. It's not punishing achievement. It's not ANY of those things by themselves. It's those, and many other things that represent governing AGAINST common sense. It is a majority of politicians governing against common sense and IGNORING those who tell them different. Punishing achievement is still at the top of the list. I have to gag every time I hear a politician talk about “the rich paying their fair share” when they're not only paying their fair share, they're paying MOST of the income taxes paid—period. And that's by the government's own figures. Next in line is thinking that they can stop gun violence by DISARMING honest people, leaving them DEFENSELESS before ILLEGALLY-armed criminals that have NO problem getting their guns. They call their “gun laws” “common sense laws,” but they're ANYTHING BUT that. Thinking you can defend yourself by DISARMING yourself it the HEIGHTS of stupidity, but when we try and tell them that, they IGNORE us.
Leaving our borders open while Islamic terrorists are pouring in by the thousands, making plans to kill people in wholesale fashion for not “ believing properly" is STUPID, but Obama is DETERMINED to do so. Not only by leaving our borders open, but by IMPORTING them by more THOUSANDS, calling them “refugees.” Talking about taxing “the rich” more than others is IGNORANCE. It kills INCENTIVE to achieve because when you do, some fool in Washington who had no hand in EARNING it takes it away from you. Yet a MAJORITY of politicians in DC talk about this constantly. Liberal politicians running big cities cause those cities to go bankrupt while suffering from high rates of violent crime. All the big cities that have such problems today are being run by liberals, and have been for many years. That this is INCOMPETENT government goes without saying. When Islamic terrorists come to my town to kill people, I want to be able to shoot back, and give them the only kind of a message they understand—a bullet in the brain. (Just REAL common sense)
That's what Obama and the liberals are doing, first in Ferguson, MO, and now in Baltimore, MD. They took one incident in each city that could be MADE to look like cop misconduct and lied about it, ruining the lives of several good cops and causing much rioting and looting by the local criminals (thugs), who willingly helped. Aided by the liberal media, which ran 7 stories about police misconduct vs. ONE about the misconduct of local CRIMINALS, Making it SEEM like the COPS are “out of control,” when they're NOT. They did it to “whip up” anger against the cops so they could “send in the cavalry and “take over” the local cops, one city at a time, by “investigating” them and issuing mew “regulations” for them to follow—regulations that gave the feds COMPLETE CONTROL of the policing in that area. It is the “creation of the new SS in America," and must be STOPPED. (Town Hall)
I'm getting really sick of the so-called “controversy” that is going on right now, to discredit the cops, who mostly keep the peace quite well. While there ARE a few “bad apples” among the cops, they are largely honest and well-meaning people who only want to do their jobs and go home at night with all their body parts still attached. But the CRIMINALS (aided by a president that WANTS to get a race war started so he can “tighten the reins” on us all, aided by such “race whores” as Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson, use it as an excuse to riot and LOOT with impunity. And such incompetent politicians as the Baltimore mayor ALLOW it by telling their cops to “step back and give them room to destroy things.” The only more STUPID thing I've ever heard a liberal politician (and it's hard to choose the most stupid remark) say is when Nancy Peelosi said, of the Obamacare legislation, “We have to pass it to find out what's IN it.” How do we GET such FOOLS running this government? That's pretty easy: we don't have a system where we demand voters be INTELLIGENT and have SOME knowledge of history, both recent and long range, before they're ALLOWED to vote. Thus we get the people Rush Limbaugh calls, “low-information voters” making decisions on our “leaders” without having any idea what they're doing. We need to start making sure voters have at least a rudimentary knowledge of what's going on in order to vote. One way might be to raise the voting age by at least ten years to give teenagers time to LEARN something before they can go out and vote in all the stupidity liberals promise us. (Just common sense)
Wednesday, May 13, 2015
Laylah Peterson was gunned down viciously by a black mob in a neighborhood that is 77% black, and Sharpton and Jackson are not interested (Likewise “Calypso Louie” Farrakhan). Not surprising. Laylah was only FIVE, and was WHITE. She was sitting on her grandfather's lap, and he was probably killed, too. The story doesn't bother to mention that. What nobody mentions is that the likes of Sharpton or Jackson just are not interested in making trouble over the death of a small WHITE girl at the hands of two BLACK men. All they care about is when the black men are the victims, and they're always willing to repeat the lies that are always told about it by their “homies.”. Nobody has even tried to find out the motive for this atrocity, since there's no money in it for them. The new Attorney General isn't interested, because there's no possibility of convicting a WHITE person of a “race crime” here to promote Obama's intended race war. (Tea Party News Network)
“City officials threatened a Virginia church with misdemeanor charges for having pro-life signs on their own property. Who needs ISIS when you’ve got government bureaucrats?” I guess the First Amendment doesn't mean ANYTHING any more with even LOCAL governments taking their cue from Obama ignoring the Constitution as long as nobody of any consequence does anything about it. So now comes a LOCAL government threatening CRIMINAL charges against a church for posting anti-baby murder signs on THEIR property. The government bureaucrats sent a letter to the Valley Church of Christ telling them “SOMEBODY” complained about a couple of pro-life signs on their church property and informing them they had ten days to remove them or face CRIMINAL charges—on what legal basis, I can't fathom. but apparently those bureaucrats think they have some legal basis, regardless of the Constitution. I'm sure this church will fight this usurpation of their rights. I'll be interested to see how it comes out. (Last Resistance)
The state, cops, CPC (Child Protection Services) and the federal government are combining to make it hard on home schoolers. In this case, they used the cops to FORCE their way into the home of a family that home schooled their children, saying (falsely) that they had the power to come in and “inspect” the home to “make sure their kids are getting proper schooling.” One of the lies they told them was that they HAD to teach the kids the SAME THINGS they would be taught in school (including the political lies), which is a bald-faced LIE. But then, CPS is used to that, they do it every day. One of the questions they asked (and insisted on an answer) is about how many GUNS they had, and where they were. So they're trying to “kill two birds with one stone.” That this “home invasion” is all based on a LIE goes without saying. And the willingness of the cops to go right along with it is CRIMINAL. (World Net Daily)
Tuesday, May 12, 2015
We've “beaten back” most of Obama's ill-advised measures to disarm Americans recently, but don't get overconfident. He has more tricks up his sleeves than any of us can imagine. He's a MASTER con-man. Next up is his “Trans-Pacific Partnership Treaty” which, if it is approved, will allow him to FORCE Congress to pass a minimum wage law. Then he said it will make it better for “high-end manufacturers to operate more efficiently” (Like, “if you like your doctor or hospital you can keep them?"). If this treaty is ratified by Congress, which requires only 2/3 majority of members PRESENT on the day it's presented for a vote to pass it, it will also give him authority to further restrict our access to, and use of guns for self-defense. The treaty mandates every country signatory to it create, and maintain, a registry of gun owners, overseen by the UN, a body run by dictators and thieves. This treaty effectively “gives away the store,” and that means our sovereignty, which is what Obama is after. If it passes, the “foot is in the door” for the UN to DICTATE our laws, regardless of the Constitution.This bill could become LAW this week, so you'd better act fast. (Eagle Rising)
That seems to be Sen. Diane Feinstein's (D-CA) way of thinking. The longer she manages to stay in power, the more arrogant and power mad she gets. Mostly she tries to ban guns for us humans while carrying her own gun for the self-protection she denies us. Now she wants to put “artisanal soap makers” out of business because she doesn't like it. So she wants to stop EVERYBODY from using it. Last year, she wanted to ban books. Any book that could possibly tell people how to make explosives. She wanted to be able to “DEEM” certain books “:outside the protection of the Second Amendment.” She must have learned constitutional law from Obama, who knows NOTHING about the Constitution except how to VIOLATE it. Check out the picture of her that accompanies this article. Her facial expression is absolutely, “I'm the queen, you're my subject” look. (AmmoLand)
That's what Hillary's people say about Gowdy's investigation into Hillary's actions with regard to Benghazi. They say since a half dozen committees have ALREADY examined it, there's “nothing new under the sun” for him to discover. Yet he HAS discovered something new. That the other committees have only interviewed ONE person who was THERE on that fateful night, proving that none of those committees really WANTED to find out what really happened, but only wanted to provide a “dog and pony show” to convince America they were DOING something, without really DOING anything. They did their thing, diddled around for a while spending our money, and shut down without learning ANYTHING, because they didn't WANT to learn anything. Gowdy's committee is a little different, and for that he's getting “friendly fire” and the usual “run-around” from Hillary. Now HE says he will “accept Hillary's word” if she “testifies, under oath” that there are no more e-mails for them to see, which tells me they're going to shut down without doing anything, too. It's “business as usual” in DC. (Tea Party Politics)
Monday, May 11, 2015
Surprise, surprise! Muslims fear Pamela Geller worse than they do ISIS! Pam says, “They’re really getting hysterical. And this speaks volumes: they’re clearly much more threatened by, and much angrier at, me than at the Islamic State (ISIS). I am worse than beheadings, mass slaughter, mass rape, sex slavery, and all the rest. Arab American News has now declared what it thinks is the real enemy: me. What will other Muslims in the U.S. Do?” The funny thing about it is the very idea that people at Arab American News are “afraid of ISIS, which is THEIR creation. I really needed a good laugh, and this took care of that for today. Usually liberals take care of the need for laughter, but today, the Muslims did it. What's really funny is they're accusing Pam (one small woman) of what THEY are guilty of. Big, bad babies! Afraid of a little gal. I guess they're just not used to women who speak for themselves. They can't intimidate her, and that frightens them, no end! (Freedom Force)
I get so tired of it. Every other day we hear about such things as IRS employees cheating on their taxes, and then getting a PROMOTION. Meanwhile, the COMMISSIONER tells us blithely that they IGNORE 60% of our phone calls because they DON'T HAVE ENOUGH MONEY to pay the people to answer them. Meanwhile, as much as 40% of the information they give us when we CAN get through to them is WRONG, and if we file based on it, WE still suffer!! It's like government employees are in a “special class” that can't be punished like human beings. And it's true! It's almost impossible to FIRE a government employee unless he's a Republican. And there aren't too many of those.
Some school; teachers and college profs “have tenure,” which is yet another way to say they “can't be fired.” Who gives ANYBODY the right to set these things up that way? Is their setup LAW? Or can they be overturned? And every day we hear about things like government employees using GOVERNMENT CREDIT CARDS to hire PROSTITUTES! And then THEY get promotions and awards. When a government employee gets somebody KILLED, nothing ever gets done about it, unless he/she is a Republican—then they are dispensed with, easily. The guy who MURDERED a woman in Ruby Ridge with her child in her arms is SHIELDED from us knowing his name until later when he gets an AWARD for it!
We do things like FIND the “lost e-mails” IRS employee Lois Lerner CLAIMED were “forever gone, and NOTHING HAPPENS as a result. They find 35,000 of Hillary's “lost e-mails” (that she DELETED, claiming they were “personal” after Congress said they wanted to see them), and nothing happens about THAT! It doesn't even slow down her run for PRESIDENT! It's like trying to catch a fish with greased hands! They try and get her to go before Congress and explain herself and she tells THEM how many times she will appear, when, and what they may ask her! Corruption is rampant in our government, and they have set up systems to avoid punishment under ALL conditions, which they can step right around if they want to ruin a Republican. (Just common sense)
The best weapon we have against Islamic terrorism (which IS coming here—soon) is an armed American populace. We need to make Tojo's prediction that “there will be a gun behind every blade of grass” come true for the Islamic fools. It happened in Texas, and they didn't even get to the civilian populace. They didn't get past the first TRAFFIC cop! Scratch two Islamic fools! In Israel, just about everybody is armed, and considered to be part of the Army. My favorite picture is of a Jewish woman, standing over a Muslim puke, pumping bullets into this brain, stopping him from his terrorist attempt. That will happen here, too, as soon as the Islamic terrorists start their “reign of terror” here.
The strange thing is that so many ignorant politicians are frightened to death of an armed populace. They know that when they come to take what's ours, if more and more people are armed, they won't survive the attempt. We need to change the aim of our gun laws to make sure most of us who are HONEST are armed at least as well as those who are criminals; and know how to use them. The individual American citizen is the best, first level of defense against those Islamic pukes. And we'd better get started on arming this country's people. Trying to keep guns out of the hands of law-abiding citizens is at best misguided, and at worst CRIMINAL, and will get people killed, even BEFORE the Islamic pukes come here. (Liberty Alliance)
Sunday, May 10, 2015
The federal government—and local government want you to think the “problems” in Baltimore (and Ferguson, MO) are because of WHITE oppression of black people. WRONG! The REAL problem is that, like most big cities, they are run by black liberals who have no idea what they're doing. And yes, I said, BLACK, not “African-American,” that liberal-coined phony word for black people. Liberals, black and white, are responsible for ALL the major problems we have, both in major cities, and smaller communities. In Baltimore, black liberals are IN CHARGE, and have been for some time. The population of the city is 60% black. The mayor is black, as are the police chief and city council president. 48% of the police force is black, and they're Democrats. Seems to me this is a problem brought on BY Democrats and black people PRETENDING it's a “white problem.” The same is true mostly in Ferguson. And the REASON is so Obama can take control over the nation's police forces, starting with Baltimore, and create “the new SS.”. “[T]he dirty little secret that no one wants to admit is that Baltimore, and so many other urban areas and inner city communities in America are a reflection of the abject failure of liberal progressive socialist policies as advanced by the Democrat party” (Says Allen West, a black man). (Tea Party Bulletin)
The Islamic terrorists themselves tell us they already have 71 trained terrorists already IN the United States, in 15 states, just “waiting for orders” to commit mayhem on OUR streets, and bring the horrors we've seen in MUSLIM countries here. Obama says they're NOT here, while he's working HARD to get as many more here as possible before they get “the order” to strike again—after it will no longer be “on Obama's watch.” They've already got five major targets mentioned (with more to come) and their people are “ready to go” at a moment's notice. I think it's noteworthy that, even though ISIS itself BRAGS that the Garland, Texas failure was theirs, Obama STILL refuses to call it Islamic terrorism, NOR will he allow anybody else he controls to do so. If America (not Obama) doesn't get off its butt and DO something about this, we're DOOMED. Not because ISIS is so good, but because we're GIVING it away! One of the things we MUST do is ARM as many good citizens as possible so Tojo's remark about there “being a gun behind every blade of grass” will come true for the Islamic terrorists. (Sooper Mexican Conservative)
The world has always assumed that the “evidence” provided by outfits such as the FBI is really “evidence,” and not faked. No more The FBI has now CONFESSED that they've been routinely faking evidence to “get their guy” for a long time, and have routinely sent innocent people to their DEATHS. When a forensic specialist, for example, tells a jury something, the jury has no way to know if he/she's lying or not. So they have to take the word of this person. If he/she's lying, his/her lie goes into the record. That's why so many innocent people are in prison. I know, I know; everybody in there is “innocent.” But with this recent revelation, I'd bet a lot more innocent people are in prison than we'll ever know. And this article only talks about the FBI. But it would be just as easy for the “locals” to fake evidence to “get” people they “know are guilty, but can't prove it.” This brings into question EVERY conviction ever handed down, anywhere. (Survival Joe)
Saturday, May 9, 2015
That's what Kate Harding says. Who's Kate Harding? Kate is a writer for a little known obscure feminist magazine called, “Dame Magazine” (whatever the hell THAT is). I've never heard of it. It probably has TWO readers. She's voting for Hillary. “An informed electorate is essential to a functioning republic. Once the scale is tipped by the uninformed or the deliberately destructive, we cease to be a republic, and we become an idiocracy.” This fool is an excellent example of that “idiocracy.” I've got something else I might vote with, but I don't announce my stupidity (if any) to the world, as she did. We have way too many people like her voting. People who pay no attention to politics and are thus IGNORANT of the facts. But they still can vote. We need to do something about that. The writer of the article linked here makes a reasoned argument against this fool's arguments, but it is not needed. The title alone is enough to tell any intelligent person Kate is STUPID, and her arguments are irrelevant. (Last Resistance)
They say, “Yes, we did it. For the glory of Allah.” Which says clearly it was an Islamic terrorist action, as far as it went, before a couple of alert cops KILLED the shooters before they could do much real damage. Yet Obama and the media STILL refuse to call it Islamic terrorism. They still call the Ft. Hood shootings “workplace violence” even though it has been proven conclusively it was an Islamic terrorist “home-grown” operation. Obama just wants to be able to continue to say (falsely) that the Islamic terrorists have never had a successful operation on my watch.” And, whatever Obama says, our media swears to it. Oh, did you notice? There's a slight difference between my headline and the one that goes with the source story. That's because I realize that there's no difference between IS and ISIS. Those fools change their names more often than they change their dirty underwear—and that's not really very often. (Mail)