Tuesday, February 28, 2017
They Say "No Evidence"
The Democrats say there is ”no evidence” (there's their favorite
phrase, again!) of massive voter fraud, but we keep finding evidence
that they IGNORE so they can continue to make that claim. One such
case is in Ohio, where they found 821 non-citizens registered to
vote, and 121 or them were known to have voted in at least one recent
election. This is “evidence.” It makes liars out of those who say
there is NO evidence of voter fraud. Yes, it's only a few. But if it
is happening here, it is happening elsewhere and just hasn't been
found, yet. And how many millions of illegal votes were counted that
way? Democrats insist there is “no evidence,” but they don't even
LOOK for evidence—and most of the illegal votes go to Democrats.
Does that tell you anything? (Daily Caller)
Diddling With the Numbers
The Labor Dept. comes out every week with numbers which are supposed
to represent unemployment. There are the U-3 numbers, which do not
include those who have been unemployed so long they've given up on
ever finding a full-time job, again. Then there's the U-6 numbers,
which INCLUDES these people. All during the Obama years, the liberal
media acted like the U-6 numbers didn't exist, so they could continue
to report that unemployment figures were going down as more and more
people gave up and left the workforce, and were not counted. That's
cheating, but we know they did it, to make Obama look good. Now that
Trump is in office, lo and behold! the liberal media "discovered"
the U-6 number and are using it to make Trump look bad. This is how
they diddle with the numbers to create a false narrative. (Just
common sense)
Gun Rights for 30 Years
The NRA sees at least 30 years of a pro-gun Supreme Court, if Judge
Neil Gorsuch is approved by Congress. In a past case, he said, “The
Second Amendment protects an individual’s right to own firearms and
may not be infringed lightly.” "So wrote U.S. Supreme Court
nominee Neil Gorsuch in United
States v. Miguel Games-Perez.
That
case demonstrates why Judge Gorsuch is a worthy successor to Justice
Antonin Scalia." He's right there, but not entirely right. The
right of all Americans to be armed shall not be infringed--PERIOD.
Lightly, or otherwise. But that, and other decisions did provide
clear evidence that Judge Gorsuch would be a good choice for the
Supreme Court, and the hatred of the Democrats for him just cements
that. (America's First Freedom)
Monday, February 27, 2017
Desperation City
Every time I hear somebody talk about Trump's “connection to the
Russians,” I laugh uncontrollably. Because “there is no there,
there.” Every story that is published about it is forced to not,
way at the bottom, in the smallest print possible, “There is NO
EVIDENCE (caps mine) to support this contention.” Yet they still
insist, to anyone who will listen, that he DID “work the the
Russians” to hurt Hillary's chances and get himself elected. “No
evidence.” Their favorite expression when confronted with Democrat
corruption, but when used BY them, to attack Trump, it is an "attack phrase." It is a necessary thing to say,
because there IS NO EVIDENCE that Trump ever did what they allege.
Yet they continue to harp on it, even now demanding a “special
prosecutor, to “look into it.” They have nothing else, except to
foment riots to keep conservatives from speaking, anywhere, and to
continue “dragging their feet” to keep Trump from getting all his
appointees confirmed by Congress. They use every parliamentary trick
there is, to do that. (Just common sense)
This Ignorant Politician
There is no shortage of ignorant politicians in office. How they got
there is anybody's guess, but they're there, and must be dealt with.
One such ignorant politician is Senator Chris Murphy (Democrat, of
course) says Americans will be safer if they had no guns with which
to defend themselves against the plethora of ARMED Islamic terrorists
still coming in, in advance of Trump's coming order to put a stop to
it. He thinks being unarmed when one of those terrorists comes to
kill you will make you safer. This kind of ignorance is common among
Democrat politicians. Yet we (not me) keep electing them, and they
keep getting people killed by not allowing them to have a gun, which
is the best means of defending themselves. He thinks, like most
anti-gun fools, that to allow law-abiding people to be armed would
create more gun crime. Something that would not happen, but don't try
to convince them, fools, all. (Grabien News)
"Enemy of Gun Rights"
Michael Bloomberg is an ENEMY of the constitutional right to own and
use the means to self defense, a gun. Ever since he finished his
ILLEGAL third term as mayor of New York City, where he tried to
control their pop-drinking habits and other things that were none of
his business, he has been meddling in Second Amendment rights all
over the country, trying his best, and spending $MILLIONS to overturn
them. I wonder what part of "shall not be abridged" he does
not understand. Now he's got his money (again) in Colorado, giving it
to lobbyists who want to destroy gun rights here. The Colorado
legislature is currently looking at a bill to better the training for
teachers and other school employees, so they can carry their guns to
school and protect their students if a mass shooter comes to kill
them. His minions say the bill will allow no training at all, at the
discretion of the county sheriff. That is an out-and-out LIE.The bill is supported by all 64
Colorado county sheriffs--and they are the people who should know.
(Ammoland)
Sunday, February 26, 2017
Is It An Anomaly?
Politicians (usually Democrats, but some Republicans, too) say such
things as this are anomalies. Kate Steinlie, in San Francisco, might
have been an anomaly if she were the ONLY innocent person murdered
in cold blood by a many-times deported illegal alien. But she's not.
There are many such cases. One of the most recent is the case of the
murderous rampage a Salvadorian citizen went on the day after
Connecticut Governor Malloy told the cops in his state not to enforce
immigration laws (for which he should be imprisoned, or at least
fined a LOT of money). This guy, who has been deported before, and
came back, murdered a mother, stabbed another woman, and kidnapped
her baby. Crimes he couldn't have committed if our borders were more
secure. Salvador has a very high murder rate, and their illegal
aliens have brought it here. Where Salvadorian immigrants are most
numerous, the murder rate suspiciously goes up. They caught him, and
the baby was miraculously physically unharmed. Will he be deported
again, and will he come back and kill again? (DC Clothesline)
Gun Buyers Confident
People were buying guns at record levels during Obama's
administration, because they were fearful that Obama would do even
more to stop them from being able to defend themselves with a gun, if
necessary. Now that Trump is in office, they have regained confidence
that this will not happen. Trump has not only PROMISED to get rid of
what Obama already accomplished in that arena (not much, thanks to
the NRA and some other organizations), he will make laws making it
all but impossible for liberals to do what Obama couldn't. Anti-gun
fools will have a "tough road to hoe" in the next four
(maybe 8) years. They've done this to the extent that the FBI says
new background check applications have DROPPED by half a million,
just in January. (Breitbart)
The Anti-Gun Fallacy
MIchael Bloomberg, one of the most virulent anti-gun fools, lives in
a "gated community" guarded by men with guns, that they
CALL a "gun-free zone." So do many other anti-gun fools, and many
(most) of them run around, surrounded by gun-carrying thugs. But they
want to deny us the same right (guaranteed by the Constitution) to also
have armed security, unless we can afford to HIRE it. One Senator thinks the
way to self defense is to open our borders to Islamic terrorists, who
have PROMISED to kill ALL "unbelievers," while taking away
the guns from its citizens so they can't defend themselves. Sen.
Chris Murphy (Democrat, of course), is that Senator. I don't know if
he lives in such a community or not, but obviously he only talks to
people who think the same way he does. So he's not intelligent enough
to know how STUPID his thinking is. If we keep electing such damned
fools to the Congress, we will continue to get STUPID "gun laws"
made. (America's First Freedom)
Saturday, February 25, 2017
"The Progressive Wing"
The Democrats do everything they can to keep from calling it what it
is. They call it “The Progressive Wing” of the Democrat Party.
But it is ANYTHING but “progressive.” It is “SOCIALIST.” That
was made evident by the fact that one of the strongest presidential
candidates in the last election was Bernie Sanders, an ADMITTED
socialist. Running against an UN-admitted socialist whose every idea is socialist. Socialism is a FAILED SYSTEM that depends on the THEFT of
money and production from those capable and willing to produce for
their own support, and GIVING that stolen, UNEARNED, to those NOT
capable OR willing to earn for themselves. It produces NO new wealth,
and therefore is doomed to failure after they've run out of “other
people's money.” It has become even more evident by the fact that
Keith Ellison, a Muslim, is a leading candidate to lead them for the
next four years. This is not a comment on his religion, but on his
MINDSET, as a Muslim. (Just common sense)
Judges Aren't Too Smart
At least, not in the Fourth Circuit Court. They just said, in a
ruling, that if you have a gun, you're automatically a "suspect."
Now THAT is stupid! Judges should be smarter than that. Having a gun,
LEGALLY, does NOT make you a "suspect." It only makes you
better able to defend yourself against the REAL suspect, the man with
an ILLEGAL gun. The fourth Circuit recently ruled that just carrying
a gun (legally) makes you "suspect," until proven innocent.
That violates the Fourth Amendment and the "innocent until
proven guilty" theory, which is LAW in this country. Maybe these
judges don't know that. If not, they have no business BEING on the
Court. One judge said that merely carrying a gun (legally or
otherwise) makes you a danger to others and subject to losing certain
constitutional protections afforded to persons who do NOT carry guns.
How big a fool does that make this judge? If they saw what I said,
they might want to find me in contempt. They'd be right. I AM in
contempt of this court. (America's First Freedom)
"They're Out of Step"
Bloomberg's suckers, "Everytown Against Guns (or some such)
says, "The NRA and President Trump are 'out of step" with
the American people." Oh, yeah? How then, did Trump win the
presidency against all the predictions about what the American people
thought? And why does the NRA have MILLIONS of members who are
concerned about their RIGHT to own and use a gun for self defense?
Why do the anti-gun fools LOSE just about every time they try
something? I think it's "Everytown" and all the other
anti-gun fools that are "out of step," and they aren't
intelligent enough to realize it. They got "bent out of shape"
about the NRA being included in a presidential strategy meeting at
the White House the other day--why? It they're so "out of step,"
such a meeting wouldn't make much difference, would it? (Guns)
Friday, February 24, 2017
Not A Speck of Proof
The story about the supposed Russian involvement in the 2016 election
and the defeat of Hillary Clinton will not die. The
Democrats won't let it, even though there's not a “speck of proof”
it ever happened. Now they're circulating a story that the Trump
administration tried to keep the FBI from investigating it, which is
not true. What they did was ask PERMISSION to make public what they'd
learned, which IS that there's still no evidence of a Russian hack of
our election. Of course, nobody talked about Obama's 15,000 attempts
to hack the Indiana and the Georgia electoral systems. They were largely unsuccessful,
which tells us a lot about their competence. So far, references to
Russian interference in our election are “fake news,” put out by
the Democrats. (DC Clothesline)
Gun-Grabbers' Fake News
You'd think he writers at Politico
would know the difference between the Social Security gun grab and
background checks, wouldn't you? Apparently not. After Congress
repealed Obama's "gun grab" of seniors who asked others to
handle their finances, the writers at Politico
reported, with a straight face, that Congress had "repealed the
background check law." I don't know if this is an attempt at
"fake news"or just plain incompetence, but it is indicative
of their bias. They BELIEVE that Congress repealed gun buyer's
background checks, and so, apparently, do their editors. They either
believe it, or they just weren't doing their job. There's a third
possibility: they enthusiastically SUPPORTED this lie. I don't know
which it is, but the story us (among others) a signal to watch them
closely. (Breitbart)
Obama Gun Grab Dumped
One of the things Obama did was to attempt to strip the Second
Amendment right from elderly people who ask for others to handle
their finances. He translated this into a means to take their guns
away, even though just asking for help with their finances do NOT
cause them to be "mentally unstable," as Obama's new rule
suggested. That this is an OBVIOUS unconstitutional act goes without
saying, and it should not have taken a LAW to undo this outrage. But
thankfully, there is now one, if President Trump signs it, now that
the House has passed it--which is what it will take. Anybody want to
take a bet on whether or not he will sign it? Under Obama's rule, all
it took for their constitutional right to be denied was approval of
an unelected bureaucrat. And it required a long and expensive appeal
process for it to be reversed--something a person in the "evening
of their life" can ill afford, as a rule. This Obama rule was
"elder abuse." But I guess he figured that he abused
everybody else, so why not them? (Washington Examiner)
Thursday, February 23, 2017
"False Prophets"
The Bible talks about “false prophets,” and warns us to “beware
of them.” I'm not an overly religious man, but I believe they were
talking about the Muslim “religion,” which is based on EVIL, as
far as I can see. They CLAIM that they don't preach death, but they
do. If you refuse to convert to their phony religion, you could face
a “death sentence,” depending upon which Muslim is demanding your
conversion. Muslim Imams all over the world are preaching hate and
murder, and suicide, making that silly “promise” of “74
virgins” they will receive in “Paradise” if they are killed
trying to advance Islam. They treat women as vassal slaves,
restricting them to their homes unless accompanied by their “slave
masters,” one of the MALE members of their family. When out, they
are required to wear what is best described as a TENT, or at least,
in some places, a head scarf called a “hijab.” Their “culture”
gives men supreme power over them, including that of life and death.
The tales of fathers and brothers KILLING girls for being SEEN with
the wrong man are rife. They may beat them at their own discretion,
and are even advised as to how best to do it by their “religion.” They
call it “honor killing.” Many of their other practices are
abhorrent, such as screwing little boys and keeping them as slaves to their sexual needs, but they claim to be superior to all of us. Come on,
people! Wake up to reality! (Just common sense)
GOP Opposing Border Wall?
Now the RINOS in the Republican Party come out and "run up their
colors." They're now OPPOSING Trump's signature promise, the
"border wall" at our southern border. They're questioning
the COST. They want to know how he is going to PAY the $12 to $15
billion it will cost to build it. Meanwhile, not a peep out of them
when Obama GAVE hundreds of BILLIONS of dollars, in the "dead of
night," to Iran. Trump has clearly said he will MAKE Mexico pay
for the wall, in one way or another, if it means withholding the
payment of every cent we were scheduled to give to the Mexican
government, until it's paid for. But they don't believe that. they
think, like the Democrats, that this promise is not true.
Maybe
they haven't yet learned that, when Trump says he will do something,
he DOES it. Hopefully, in FOUR YEARS of Trump doing just that, they
will come to realize that. Of course, the "physical wall"
is just part of it, since such a wall is USELESS without monitoring.
And that WILL be provided, unlike what happens with Obama's promises.
I want to know one thing: why did we hear not a peep out of these
people when Obama GAVE AWAY billions of dollars, and then they get
all "concerned" about where Trump is going to get the money
to pay for his wall? Maybe they need to ask Obama where he got all
those billions he "threw around" in his 8 years (and not
just on Iran), and HOPE he will tell them the truth. He doesn't have
a very good record on telling the truth, however, (News Max)
Diddling the Numbers
The Labor Dept. comes out every week with numbers which are supposed
to represent unemployment. There's the U-3 numbers, which do not
include those who have been unemployed so long they've given up on
ever finding a full-time job, again. that there's the U-6 numbers,
which INCLUDES these people. All during the Obama years, the liberal
media acted like the U-6 numbers didn't exist, so they could continue
to report that unemployment figures were going down as more and more
people gave up and left the workforce, and were not counted. That's
cheating, but we know they did it, to make Obama look good. Now that
Trump is in office, lo and behold! tThe liberal media "discovered"
the U-6 number and are using it to make Trump look bad. This is how
they diddle the numbers to create a false narrative. (Just common
sense)
Wednesday, February 22, 2017
Making It About Racism
The liberals learned a lot about how to get their bizarre laws
passed. Just make it about racism, and Republicans will "cave,"
immediately. But what it actually is, is black against WHITE racism,
which liberals and certain black people (like those in "Black
Lives Matter") are pushing to the hilt, figuring if they can
make it a real "thing," they can make the black race
predominant. In any case, it's a good way to "control" the
Republicans and force them to "knuckle under," lest they be
called racist. The one flaw in that is people like me (and there are
a lot of us), who don't give a damn about the labels they try and
apply to us. If they're wrong, black or white, I'm going to call it
wrong, and I don't give a hoot what color they are. They've probably
already got me labeled a racist six ways to Sunday, anyway. And I
just don't care.
(Bearing Arms)
Diddling With Numbers
The Labor Dept. comes out every week with numbers which are supposed
to represent unemployment. There's the U-3 numbers, which do not include those who have been unemployed so long they've given up on
ever finding a full-time job, again. Then there's the U-6 numbers,
which INCLUDES these people. All during the Obama years, the liberal
media acted like the U-6 numbers didn't exist, so they could continue
to report that unemployment figures were going down as more and more
people gave up and left the workforce, and were not counted.
That's cheating, but we know they did it, to make Obama look good.
Now that Trump is in office, lo and behold! the liberal media
"discovered" the U-6 number and are using it to make Trump
look bad. This is how they diddle with the numbers to create a false
narrative. (Just common sense)
Gun Rights for 30 Years
The NRA sees at least 30 years of a pro-gun Supreme Court, if Judge
Neil Gorsuch is approved by Congress. In a past case, he said, “The
Second Amendment protects an individual’s right to own firearms and
may not be infringed lightly.” "So
wrote U.S. Supreme Court nominee Neil Gorsuch in United
States v. Miguel Games-Perez.
That
case demonstrates why Judge Gorsuch is a worthy successor to Justice
Antonin Scalia."
He's right there, but not entirely right. The
right of all Americans to be armed shall not be infringed--PERIOD.
Lightly, or otherwise. But
that, and other decisions did provide clear evidence that Judge
Gorsuch would be a good choice for the Supreme Court, and the hatred
of the Democrats for him just cements that. (Americas First Freedom)
Tuesday, February 21, 2017
:Blind Sheikh Dead
Omar Abdel Rahman, known as "The Blind Sheikh," because he
WAS blind, died in prison the other day, after a long battle with
diabetes and other ailments often found in "senior citizens."
He was 78. He was the "mastermind" behind the first World
Trade Center bombing that only killed six, but injured thousands.
Such should be the fate of ALL Islamic terrorists who want to kill
lots of "non-believers"
for no other reason but that they don't believe in his "religion."
Islamic terrorists will regard him
as a "martyr," and will no doubt use his death behind bars
as yet another excuse to kill some more "unbelievers."
There's nothing wrong with that, except for the deaths and injuries
caused by his "followers." We need to create as many
martyrs as we can. That's
all they're good for. Throw his body in the dumpster outside the
prison. That will show him the "respect" he has "earned."
His family, supporters, and an Egyptian Human Rights organization
were demanding he be released, and returned to Egypt, due to his
deteriorating health, as was a terrorist involved in an airline
bombing in Lockerbie,
Scotland,
who was feted and treated as a hero upon returning to Libya.
They called it a "compassionate release." But
neither
deserved
it. He deserved to die in prison for his sins, and he did. The
Lockerbie murderer was said to have only 3 months to live, but lived
another two years, in freedom, while his victims lay in their graves. (NY Times)
This Ignorant Politician
There is no shortage of ignorant politicians in office. How they got
there is anybody's guess, but they're there, and must be dealt with.
One such ignorant politician is Senator Chris Murphy (Democrat, of
course) says Americans will be safer if they had no guns with which
to defend themselves against
crminals and
the plethora
of Islamic terrorists still coming in, in advance of Trump's coming
order to put a stop
to it. He thinks being unarmed when one of those terrorists come to
kill you will make you safer. This kind of ignorance is common among
Democrat politicians. Yet we (not me) keep electing them, and they
keep getting people killed by not allowing them to have a gun, which
is the best means of defending themselves. He thinks, like most
anti-gun fools, that to allow law-abiding people to
be armed would create more gun crime. Something that would not
happen, but don't try to convince them,
fools,
all. (Grabien News)
Enemy of Gun Rights!
Michael Bloomberg is an ENEMY of the constitutional right to own and
use the means to self defense, a gun. Ever since he finished his
ILLEGAL third term as mayor of New York City, where he tried to
control their pop-drinking habits and other things that were none of
his business, he has been meddling in Second Amendment rights all
over the country, trying his best, and spending $MILLIONS to overturn
them. I wonder what part of "shall
not be abridged" he does not understand. Now he's got his money
(again) in Colorado, giving it to lobbyists who want to destroy gun
rights here. The Colorado legislature is currently looking at a bill
to better the training for teachers and other school employees,
so they can carry their guns to school and protect their students if
a mass shooter comes to kill them. His
minions say the bill will allow no training at all, at the discretion
of the county sheriff. The bill is supported by all 64
Colorado county sheriffs--and they are the people who should know.
(Ammoland)
Monday, February 20, 2017
"Bloodbath" to Continue?
As soon as the new Sec. of State took office, he went in and "cleaned
out" most of the "Obama leftovers" on the 7th floor,
as well as a couple of the higher ranking "officials" in
offices right next to his. One of the problems right now is that
Trump is having so much trouble getting his appointments past
Congress because of Democrat "foot-dragging." Without those
new directors, it's difficult to get those in the second rank or
lower out--and that's probably one of the reasons for the
"foot-dragging." While they Remain, They can continue to
undermine Trump, Simply By The Way They "ENFORCE" his rules, therefore making him look incompetent. The best example of this is how his "immigration" EO was
handled, by bureaucrats who SHOULD have known the right way to
enforce it, without "detailed instructions" from Trump.
Such micromanaging should not be necessary for a president. (Just common sense)
Gun Activist's Dream
MInnesota is even now voting on some laws (introduced by Republicans,
of course) that will, if passed, make Minnesota a "gun-activist's
dream." There are several bills up for action, designed to
"loosen up" restrictions on their citizen's tight to own
and use the means to self defense, a gun. Currently, Minnesota will
not allow people to defend themselves OUTSIDE their home. They're
required to RUN inside before being allowed to assert self defense.
That law, among others, is one they're hoping to change. Another is
to make "constitutional carry," a constitutional right,
legal in Minnesota. Anti-gun fools are "jumping up and down"
because these kinds of laws are being introduced all over the
country--and that can only be a GOOD thing. (Daily Caller)
"Obama Lacks Backbone"
Chris Cox, of NRA-ILA says, Obama lacks the political backbone to
keep Chicago from becoming a national disgrace." He even sent
them his chief of staff (Rahm Emanuel) to be their mayor, and nothing HE did (which was mostly nothing) did any good. The bodies just kept
piling up, while Emanuel told Islamic terrorists disguised as
"refugees," "You are safe in Chicago" while the
bodies got deeper and deeper.
Meanwhile, the terrorists will meet their match in Chicago's gangs,
who are regularly engaged in their own war, and won't hesitate to
shoot any terrorists who get in their way. That's what they do to
their neighbors, after all. Cox said controlling the "gun crime"
in Chicago is simple: you punish use of a gun in crime severely, and
let honest, law-abiding citizens have the means to defend themselves.
But neither Emanuel, or any other anti-gun fool will hear of that, so
the killing continues--but it Trump has anything to say about it (and
he will), it will stop--or at least be reduced to manageable
proportions. (Breitbart)
Sunday, February 19, 2017
Build Trump's Wall?
Should Trump build the wall he so fervently
promised?
Yes. He did promise, after all. But he should not rely totally on
that wall to, by itself, "solve his problem." And I don't
think he is dumb enough to do so. There should be many ways to
MONITOR that wall, including cameras, motion sensors, and other
things, including stepped-up patrols by the Border Patrol. And he
should not ANNOUNCE what he is going to do, so the illegal aliens can
figure out ways around it. Critics say the wall can be "tunneled
under" and "gone over," and they're right. That's why
the wall, which would make it HARDER to enter the United States
illegally, must be tightly monitored. Only the ignorant would build a
wall and not monitor it, in as many ways as they can, knowing how
inventive illegal aliens can be. I figure "The Wall" was
only a symbol for what Trump is going to do to shore up the illegal
entry of people who would rather violate the law than do it legally.
(CNBC)
"Nazi Trump"
I'm getting really tired of the "over-the-top" insults
Democrats and other liberal dumb butts heap on Donald Trump and
everybody who agrees with him. All the "demonstrations" and
depredations committed by anti-Trump fools also. Demonstrations are
okay, They are given protection in the Constitution. But
not the kind of demonstrations put on by the liberals, with riots,
marauding fools
setting limousines on fire, hitting pro-Trump people in the head
with steel bars,
even SHOOTING them.
running around purposely breaking expensive store windows, and
generally making nuances of themselves.
Then
you add the Democrat efforts to hamstring Trump in his ability to
govern, from the position of the MINORITY party when they can't
really oppose him in the long run. all that does is cost a lot of
money and waste
a lot of time that
could
be better used in
actually
governing.
The Democrat Party is proving themselves to be "enemies of the
people," rather than the "loyal opposition." They have
become THUGS, willing to commit ANY crime to make their point. People
who should be kept OUT of any position of authority, at all costs,
and PUT DOWN like the ENEMIES they are. A party with NO logical goal
except to obstruct Republicans at every point, even when such
obstruction does all of us, even them, damage. (Just common sense)
End Gun-Free Zones
Trump has promised to END gun-free
zones in
schools, and the anti-gun fools are having a spasm, as if that would
make things a lot worse than they are now. Well, ALL school mass
shootings have happened IN gun-free zones, so what good are they?
They are a SHAM. They stop NO mass shootings, anywhere. And if you
have a "gun-free zone," you can count on a shooter to
eventually
target you, because they SEARCH OUT gun-free zones in which to do
their shooting, since
they
can be pretty sure there will be no law-abiding gun carriers there to
oppose them. People bound
and determined to kill a bunch of people aren't going to be worried
about violating a piddling gun-free zone. And that's the fatal flaw
in the gun-free zone idea. (Guns)
Saturday, February 18, 2017
No Congressional White Caucus
I've said it many times, and now they've made it come to pass. What's
good for the goose is not good for the gander (They'll probably take
me to task for that "goose" comment). There IS a "BLACK
Congressional Caucus," and now somebody suggested a WHITE
Congressional Caucus, and the NAACP
lost their minds (if they had any,
to begin with). They don't WANT white congresspeople to have a voice
similar to theirs.
They
want to keep that idea strictly for BLACK congresspeople. There
aren't any black colleges, either.
The fact that this is black against white RACISM is lost on them.
They can have their "black only" organizations, but white
people aren't allowed to have the same. It's an accepted practice
that blacks can have their "black only" organizations and
institutions, but that whites may NOT have similar organizations or
institutions. And if a white person DARES to suggest otherwise, they
call them racists. (Daily Caller)
Mass Stupidity
Most of the worst mass shootings happened OUTSIDE the USA. That's the
determination of the Crime Prevention Research Center CPRC), anyway
(Hey! Here's something we didn't know [sic]: most of them are
committed by Islamic terrorists!).
In
their "findings" they talk about mass shootings that happen
in war-torn and Islamic terrorist-plagued countries like Bono State,
Nigeria, where
Boko Haram (an Islamic terrorist outfit) killed 300 in a mass
shooting. And
just as many the next day. This
outfit also KIDNAPPED 300 young girls and sold them into
sex
slavery. Their criteria for defining
a mass shooting is where 15 or more are killed. A level a little
higher than ours
(Ours is 5 or more).
That's how they create statistics that look bad for people who want
to defend themselves.
These figures IGNORE what happened in Orlando, FL, even though 49
people died there and almost another 50 were injured. They figure
that's "small potatoes" compared to the depredations of
Boko Haram, and they're right. Meanwhile, we're importing Islamic
terrorists disguised as "refugees" by the hundreds of
thousands. Our
time is coming. Especially with legal gun owners being denied the
right to carry them, or saddled with impossible rules on how to
handle them. It's only a matter of time before Islamic terrorists
have a mass shooting
here,
where 300 or more Americans are killed.
(Bearing Arms)
Ending Chicago Gun Crime
You will never be able to end it completely, but there are ways to
reduce it to manageable proportions that Trump can use, without
taking away the constitutional right of honest Chicago residents to
have the means to defend themselves. One is to get rid of the idea
that the "stop and frisk" policy, if used, will bring down
the wrath of the federal government. That will serve to make cops
more able to nip crime in the bud, using their innate senses and
abilities, before it becomes a shooting. The other is to fully
enforce the laws adding significant time to the sentences of
criminals using guns in their crimes, That's a thing that is
regularly waived to get convictions in other crimes. That's just lazy
policing. But the most important thing is the first thing mentioned.
Allowing the cops to do their jobs without liberals peering over
their shoulder, ready to "jam them up" for doing their
jobs. That will go a long way toward improving morale among
cops--which will improve results, Mayor Emanuel notwithstanding.
(Washington Times)
Friday, February 17, 2017
More "Fake News"
Somewhere,
in
the "bowels of the federal government," are MILLIONS of
what
they call "contingency plans." There are hundreds, maybe
even thousands of government employees whose only job it is ro come
up with these contingency plans for every possible contingency
imaginable. Most of them are worked up, cussed
and discussed,
and then thrown on the
pile of contingency plans already there, and forgotten, until, or
unless a real emergency
arises, fitting certain conditions as specified on those contingency
plans, and then advanced as a POSSIBILITY to solve a major problem.
The
Associated press got hold of one of those contingency plans
where it was suggested to use hundreds of thousands of National Guard
"citizen soldiers" to "round up" lots of illegal
aliens and "ship 'em out,
probably as a LEAK from an anti-Trump holdover employee, and "ran
with it," as if it was a real
plan
on Trump's
table for use, right now, to make it look like he is considering it.
He probably doesn't even KNOW about it, as it is with all the others
gathering dust in some deep, dark space. They
ran the
story in the most distressing way to further discredit Trump, as if
it were HIS plan, when it might have been created years ago.
It
has just enough believably
that certain kinds of people "buy it," right away, without
even thinking. Democrats are such people, since they are "beating
their
heads against the wall" trying to find
something, ANYTHING, to use against
Trump. (NBC News)
Gun-Grabbers Horrified!
They hate the very thought of school teachers being allowed to bring
their guns to school. As if that has been a problem in the past. They
favor allowing only uniformed, armed security guards being
allowed to carry guns, instead. This
is foolish,
because, as has been proven time and again, potential shooters can
"take him out" from ambush,
before
the serious shooting begins,
because he is easily identified and isolated. Allowing
and training others to have guns, who are NOT so easily identified and isolated,
makes the job of a potential shooter harder, maybe impossible, which
is a good thing.
But these damned fools will not hear of it. Their minds are made up,
so don't confuse them with facts. (Denver Post)
Social Security Gun Grab
Under Obama, "rules" were changed
to allow the government to deny Second Amendment rights to Social
Security recipients who decided to allow somebody other than
themselves to handle their finances, for ANY reason, claiming doing
so showed them unfit to have guns. Congress, under Republican control
now, has decided to reverse that, and it will not longer be a factor.
But
I wonder if those who have ALREADY been disallowed guns under that
"rule" will be given their guns back?
I'm sure that "holdover Obama bureaucrats" will keep those
guns until specifically ORDERED to return them, thus effectively
"dragging their feet" to make it more difficult, ant
time-consuming for the Trump administration. (Bearing Arms)
Thursday, February 16, 2017
Target Stores Suffering
They made a "big thing" about allowing MEN into women's
bathrooms and changing rooms if they "think" they're women,
and somebody created a boycott because of it. Their stock went WAY
down after that, and they lost 10 BILLION in value because of it. I'd
bet the guy in the board room who thought of that is long gone, or
SHOULD be. They have canceled several big projects designed to make
their future brighter. I hope they realize what the cause of their
losses is, and reverse that policy, now that ADULTS are in charge in
DC. I'd hate for them to "go down in flames." Target tried
to explain away the losses, saying
that's the "ebb and flow of business." That's a BIG flow,
in such a short time, after a recognizable cause! One
thing they don't understand is that transgenders are such a SMALL
percent of their customers. Figures show ONE in 24,000 people live as
the sex opposite to their own. It's a real "tempest in a
teapot," and they don't know it. (Breitbart)
Making It About Religion
Liberals are twisting the Trump 7-nation ban on immigration as being
a "religious ban." It is NOT. It is a TERRORIST ban! What
makes it SEEM like a "religious ban" is that ALL the
terrorists these days ARE Muslims. But we are NOT banning MUSLIMS. We
are banning TERRORISTS, who HAPPEN to be Muslims, and the liberals
are making the most of it in confusing people who pay no attention to
politics and read mostly only the headlines. That this is dishonest
goes without saying.
This is only one of the ways in which they twist the meaning of news
items to advance their narrative. Often they do it, just by the words
they use in their report. In fact, it is common for liberal reporters
to refer to Trump's "religious ban" to keep Muslims out of
the country, which is a LIE, and they know it. But they do it, anyway. (Blabber Buzz)
They Know Nothing
The Washington
Post
and most major newspaper writers know absolutely NOTHING about guns,
yet they write "scholarly articles" about them, as if they
do. For instance, a current Washington
Post
article about suppressors shows their abysmal ignorance about guns,
but they keep writing and publishing articles with phony "alternative
facts" about them, and people who pay no attention don't know
any better than to believe their horse manure.
Bearing
Arms
says "You have to give Washington
Post
points for tenacity because, no matter how many times they are proven
wrong, they keep publishing this kind of trash." One reporter
wrote several false stories, from LACK of knowledge, and another
reporter who DID know something about guns
tried to write a retraction, but the editors refused to run it.
Obviously, they'd rather be wrong if it advanced their wish to disarm
law-abiding Americans. (Bearing Arms)
Wednesday, February 15, 2017
Special Kind of Stupid
I've lost count of the number of cities (including my own)
that
have declared themselves "sanctuary cities" where illegal
aliens are treated as if they are invisible--except where giving them
"entitlements" is concerned. The top politicians in these
cities KNOW they're "playing with fire" to do so, but there
are
more
declaring themselves so every day. They KNOW Trump isn't going to
take their violation of federal law lightly. First of all, he is
going to stop giving them the money the feds have been paying them
(which is in the MILLIONS of dollars every year) and he may even file
criminal charges against anybody in those cities (including their
mayors and other politicians and bureaucrats who are OBLIGATED to
enforce the law)
who refuse to do so.
Some could even end up in prison,
Why
do they insist on making trouble for themselves?
Do they really think it will be to their benefit? That takes a
special kind of stupid! (Just common sense)
Blaming the Victim
The State of Washington is looking at making a law to punish
people who fail to safely secure guns when they store them,
when that gun is used carelessly by an adult or a child. which is
basically "blaming the victim," which is something liberal
Democrats do so well. There must be something in the air in that part
of the country that creates anti-gun fools. The governor of Oregon,
which is right next door, is also an anti-gun fool. Yes, guns should
be stored safely so that children can't get their hands on them and
carelessly shoot someone. Adults, too. The NRA teaches a course on
that, but anti-gun fools HATE the NRA and all its works. So they will
never recommend anything they have anything
to do with. And their idea of "safe gun storage" basically
only makes it impossible
for
legal gun owners to get their guns in action fast enough to be able
to defend themselves against an ILLEGAL gun owner who is attacking
them. (My Northwest)
De Facto Gun Ban
In Oregon, the governor (whose campaign for election was largely
financed by Mike Bloomberg) is using "loopholes" in the law
to form a de facto gun ban, Example: gun purchases that must be
"vetted" by the state police can be held up literally
FOREVER by bureaucratic foot-dragging.
Meanwhile, the applicant, who may be in grave danger when applying,
is killed.
There are many other ways this is being done and Oregon Governor Kate
Brown
(a liberal Democrat, of course)
is using all of them, and doing everything she can to create more
ways to cause "foot-dragging" that constitutes a de facto
gun ban. And if she is successful, you can depend upon other states
run by liberals
to take notice and do likewise. This kind of thing is despicable, but
it is something people who value their right to self defense must
deal with.
There's a picture with this article linked here, showing her and her
friends grinning like idiots while she signs these things into law.
(Oath Keepers)
Tuesday, February 14, 2017
Cows Get A Bad Rap
The government has actually gone so far as to charge farmers a fee
for each cow on their farm, because of "cow farts." They
SAY the methane gas emitted when they fart adds to global
warming....er, uh, climate change, as they now call their swindle.
But why lay it all on cows? Horses fart. PEOPLE fart. Dogs fart, and
so do cats, though cats hide it better. Elephants fart, and hippos
fart. Every living thing that has a waste disposal orifice farts. I
hate to bring this up, because the bureaucrats and politicians will
just use it to screw us out of even more of our hard-earned money. That's
all it is: a way to screw us out of
more
money. That can also be said about "climate change,"
itself. AlGore seized
upon "global warming" so he could use it to become rich,
and it worked, He has become a billionaire promoting this swindle.
Obama took it up, late
in his administration, so he could also use it to screw us out of
more money,
and make more and better laws and regulations to better control us..
Al found it necessary to change its name to "climate change,"
because
REAL climate scientists found that the world hasn't been "warming"
for almost 20 years! Now he can attribute ANY weather anomaly to his
swindle and still con people out of their money. (Just common sense)
Enforce the Current Laws
Every time there is a mass shooting, or even a simple gun crime the
ignorant politicians scream for "more gun laws," even
though none of the ones out there work. Even those that might do some
good, such as the ones mandating stiffer sentences for criminals
who use a gun in the commission of a crime. Those charges are
routinely waived to get convictions in other crimes. I call that lazy
law enforcement. In Oregon, legislators are yammering for what? More
gun laws, of course, meanwhile not enforcing current laws continues
apace. As usual, the laws they propose work to make it more difficult
for honest, law-abiding people to get their guns, or to get them in
action fast enough to successfully oppose criminals with their
ILLEGAL guns, who do not OBEY such laws. (Oregon Firearms Federation)
Pushing the Impossible
The police politicians got together and came up with a conclusion:
"The way to stop gun violence is a more powerful ATF and gun
control." Really, now! How's that worked out for ya so far, huh?
The definition of insanity is doing the same things over and over and
expecting a different result, and that's what they're doing. "Gun
control" hasn't accomplished a thing so far, because it is
universally aimed in the wrong direction: toward honest, law-abiding
gun owners,"
who aren't the problem, at all.
Nothing is being done to make it harder for ILLEGAL gun owners to get
their guns,
or to punish them more severely when they use a gun for crime. In
fact, CURRENT laws giving them stiffer sentences for using a gun are
routinely waived to get convictions in other crimes.
They can't even know who HAS them. Whenever a criminal wants a gun,
he has no trouble getting one in a back alley somewhere, out of the
trunk of another criminal's car. Yet they want more of the same? Are
they really dumb enough to think more of the same can do anything to
solve the problem? Apparently, they are. Meanwhile, the "rank
and file" cops think otherwise. (Police Foundation)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)