Monday, July 6, 2015

Blames the Cops

The family of a man charged with murder in the killing of a cop in Indianapolis say, “The cop should have stayed in his car.” What? Are they STUPID? It's not the cop's JOB to “stay in his car” while a crime is going on. They say the cop probably CAME to kill him, since his FATHER was killed by a cop. How stupid IS this bunch? Davis' father was drunk and fighting police when he died of a heart attack. He was NOT killed BY the cops. But the family (of course) blamed the cops. Cops don't usually go out to kill people in revenge. Criminals sometimes do. Pam Moorman, one of his relatives, says, “He's a good person, even if he DID kill this cop." Right. Then why did he have an automatic weapon? Does he carry an automatic weapon routinely for “protection?” Why? The killer's father had been arrested 15 times, And did three years on drug charges. A real “upright” family. This cop killer also had multiple drug arrests and was “brandishing” his gun when approached by this cop. These people seem to have “an unswerving ability to justify any and all criminal activity from their family members” while blaming the cops for trying to keep the peace. (Bearing Arms)

Sodom and Gomorrah

If you're religiously leaning, you probably know about Sodom and Gomorrah, the city that was so sinful that God destroyed it. I don't know if that really ever happened, but if it did, America better watch out because its days are numbered, since one of the major arguments today is whether the same sex can not only have sex, but “get married,” too. And they not only want it to be “mainstream, but REQUIRED to be approved by everybody. Gay sex used to be against the LAW. But now it's not only “lawful,” but everybody who disagrees with it is labeled as a bigot. I guess the gays are getting their revenge now, for all those years they had to hide their proclivities. I have no problem with homosexuals, but I resent having it pushed in my face and being REQUIRED to approve. (1776 Coalition)

SF Makes Us Less Safe

They have banned hollow point bullets. Apparently, in their incompetence, they think a bullet designed for less penetration is more dangerous than one that is designed for MORE penetration. What this means is more people are going to get shot, maybe killed by bullets that have already passed through somebody. Liberal politicians (which abound in California) are notoriously incompetent, and when they do such things as this, they prove it, again and again, while people die of their stupidity. I'm surprised they don't ban bullets, altogether. That's the kind of stupid things they do. If these politicians had to take responsibility for all the people their laws kill, they' ALL be in prison, awaiting execution. (Second Amendment Insider)

Sunday, July 5, 2015

Where's the Outrage?

I can't understand why Obama is allowed to let murderers go free. I know he's president, and all that, but 30,000 illegal alien MURDERERS? And WHY would he DO such a thing? And why does NOBODY in DC or anywhere else DO anything about it? Meanwhile, those released kill ANOTHER 124 innocent people. Still nobody does anything about getting those murderers back behind bars. Why? Are the lives of those 124 people not worthwhile? Can we allow a president to release 30,000 convicted MURDERERS into our society? Isn't there a law that can prevent it? Obama has done a lot of bad things, but this is the worst. I'm outraged. You should be, too. Why aren't there more people outraged? Can somebody tell me? 30,000 MURDERERS are loosed upon our society by this incompetent president, and NOBODY either notices, or is outraged. Excerpt for the families of those 124 victims, anyway. And who is listening to them? If you're outraged, let me know. I'd like to know. (Cowboy Byte)

"Out of the Closet"

Megan Kelly just “came out of the closet.” She's not a Republican. She's an independent. So the hell WHAT? You don't have to be a Republican to work for Fox. That's a liberal myth, like most of what they say. I'M an independent. A “Rational Independent,” to be specific. That means I make up my OWN mind on all things, political, or otherwise. She says she has voted for Democrats, on occasion. That doesn't sound too smart. Although I've seen a couple of Democrats I would have voted for if I could be sure they wouldn't “caucus with Democrats.” Although the number of Democrats I would have voted for number in the single digits and only based on their performance. (Tea Party Politics)

Troublemaking Militant Gays

It's a pretty crappy thing to do. I think these guys canvassed churches until they found one that refused to “officiate” their “connecting” like a marriage, so they could make trouble for them. And make trouble they did. They're now suing to FORCE the church to ”marry” them. Their local church was very cooperative, and would have performed their ceremony. But they didn't want that. They wanted to make trouble for a church, so they searched out a church who would refuse, so they could sue them. They have enough money to “rake the church over the coals” and “have their way with them.” I mean that exactly the way it sounds: they want to screw that church, and are well on the way to raping it. I'm sure the church wouldn't sue THEM for BEING gay. They say, “it's a shame we have to take Christians to court to MAKE them recognize us.” And why SHOULD they? People have a right to their own opinion about ANYTHING. In England there is a law ALLOWING churches to refuse such foolishness. But they don't care. They want to make trouble, anyway. They don't care about the law. They want what they want, and to hell with the law. I suppose now they'll sue ME for writing this. (The Libertarian Republic)

Saturday, July 4, 2015

Happy 4th!

I need a day off, and this is it. Be back tomorrow (If I'm still alive, that is). Happy 4th!

Friday, July 3, 2015

Their Own Medicine

It's about time somebody started effectively fighting back, making ISIS killers die the same way they kill their victims. In an ironic reversal, these black suited killers were lined up, wearing their black suits, and executed by men wearing orange jump suits. No, they weren't beheaded. They just had their heads blown off by a bullet in the back of the head, which is just as effective, and frightening, as we can see by the men's faces as they prayed to allah for their 76 virgins, which they knew were coming soon to them, if that isn't a lie, too. There's no telling how many executions these men attended in a reverse position, holding the guns while others sat on their knees waiting for a bullet or a knife. Now they know how their victims felt. It's time we started killing these fools the same way they kill their victims, and in as great a number as possible. I don't usually like to see somebody's head ventilated, but I make an exception for these pathetic fools.(Shoebat)

Gay Doesn't Bother Me

I couldn't care less what homosexuals do in the privacy of their bedrooms. But I rebel when they try and push it in my face by DEMANDING they get their way (which is, or was, in no way supported by any law), or they RUIN those who don't approve of their lifestyle. They say they have the right to “love” whoever they want. But being gay has never had anything to do with love. It has to do with SEX, pure and simple. Marriage is for the purpose of protecting and supporting the building of a family, which is IMPOSSIBLE naturally to gays. Yes, some of them have children. But for a child to exist, it requires input from BOTH sexes, and for them to PRETEND to be parents is UNNATURAL and gives them their own innocent, ignorant little child to “brainwash” into being gay. They can screw each other and play at being parents all they want, but to use the word “marriage” to describe their “unions” is an abomination. I have nothing against them creating a “contract” between them exactly like marriage, but I abhor them using the WORD “marriage” to describe it. (Just common sense)

"We Need More Cops!"

That's what New York City residents are now crying for. More cops to defend them, while doing everything they can to “run them off.” Al Sharpton and his cronies march, saying, “What do we want? More dead cops!” (Sharpton should be in PRISON for that. Him, and everybody else who advocates killing cops). Oh: I should say that the same groups of people are not all doing it. Crime is rising in New York—and Baltimore—and Ferguson, MO, and they wonder why. Can they really be that STUPID? The cops are their last, best source of protection from their enemies, but they're making it as hard as possible for them to do their jobs, and even to walk around wearing their uniforms! Who do you call when someone attacks you? The local gangs? The terrorists?

No, you call the COPS! Terrorism is a growing problem in New York City, and there is a distinct shortage of cops experienced in dealing with terrorists. I don't know if that's how Obama PLANNED it, but that's the way it's working. The more we put targets on our cops, the less they're going to WANT to be out there taking a bigger chance on being murdered BECAUSE they're wearing that uniform—and who is going to suffer? WE are! Meanwhile, the government is working HARD to DISARM us, and keep us defenseless against ALL threats—from local criminals, to terrorists, who have PROMISED to come here and kill us. Best we ARM OURSELVES and grit our teeth, and be ready to KILL terrorists as soon as they raise their ugly heads. Maybe we should line a few of them up and shoot them in the back of the head, like they do us. (NYPost)

Thursday, July 2, 2015

The Democrat Way

If the news isn't good enough for you, make your own news. That's what they're doing with the imaginary “black church burnings,” most of which are either white churches, or if they are black, are BURNED by blacks, to make it LOOK like “rampant whites” are burning churches “again.” I say again because the hoax Bill Clinton capitalized on is just as phony. His claim to have SEEN many black churches burn in his youth was proven just as phony. That's how liberal Democrats “whip up” hatred and “separation of the masses” so they can use that to make laws they couldn't have made, otherwise. Clinton lied about that, and many other things, just as Obama is doing, now. They count on the “short memories” of the deluded so nobody will remember their lies. They're doing that now, both to keep our minds off Obama's crimes, and to give him the leverage to make unconstitutional laws. (Town Hall)

It's Still Not Enough!

A lot of people will want to move to Wisconsin as long as people like Scott Walker are making the laws there. He recently signed two bills into law that common sense and logic would tell ANY politician is a good thing (and will piss off Obama and his accomplices). One reverses Wisconsin's decades-long “waiting period for gun buyers,” probably after the highly publicized murder of one woman while she was waiting for approval of her application for a gun permit after being threatened by her husband. The other allows FORMER POLICE OFFICERS to carry their guns on school campuses. It's a move in the right direction, but it's not enough. What's so special about ex-cops? Why not just allow ALL citizens to carry their legally-carried guns on school property so the potential mass killers will never know if there will be somebody there, armed and ready to “take them out” as soon as they start shooting? Politicians need to accept the obvious: that the “bad guys” will bring their guns on school grounds, whatever the law, so we need honest, reliable people to be armed, too, to counter that. (Outdoor Hub)

"We Need More Cops!"

 That's what New York City residents are crying for. More cops to defend them, while doing everything they can to “run them off.” Al Sharpton and his cronies march, saying, “What do we want? More dead cops!” (Sharpton should be in PRISON for that. Him, and everybody else who advocates killing cops. I should say that the same groups of people are not all doing it. Crime is rising in New York—and Baltimore—and Ferguson, MO, and they wonder why. Can they really be that STUPID? The cops are their last, best source of protection from their enemies, but they're making it as hard as possible for them to do their jobs, and even to walk around wearing their uniforms! Who do you call when someone attacks you? The local gangs? The terrorists? No, you call the COPS!

Terrorism is a growing problem in New York City, and there is a distinct shortage of cops experienced in dealing with terrorists. I don't know if that's how Obama PLANNED it, but that's the way it's working. The more we put targets on our cops, the less they're going to WANT to be out there taking a bigger chance on being murdered BECAUSE they're wearing that uniform—and who is going to suffer? WE are! Meanwhile, the government is working HARD to DISARM us, and keep us defenseless against ALL threats—from local criminals, to terrorists, who have PROMISED to come here and “do their dirty work.” Best we ARM OURSELVES and grit our teeth, and be ready to KILL terrorists as soon as they raise their ugly heads. (Town Hall)

Wednesday, July 1, 2015

Law Is for ALL

Muslims, too. If a Christian double-parked outside a church and went inside for an hour-long service, he/she'd definitely get a ticket. In fact, he/she would probably get towed away AND ticketed. But the Muslims were very surprised when they were forced to obey the law. They know they have to be there every Friday, so why can't they make other arrangements for their taxis than double-parking them for an hour and tying up traffic? If they don't like obeying the law, they can go back to the bug-infested Muslim-run countries they left for a better place—which they're trying HARD to make just like what they left. Muslims seem to think they merit “special privileges” because of their “religion.” They don't. They're GUESTS here, and they need to abide by OUR laws. Yes, they have been given special privileges, and they take them for granted until it becomes ridiculous. It's time we cracked down on them. (Biz Pac Review)

SCOTUS "Grants" Gay Marriage

The decision came down very early this morning (last Friday) and gays are celebrating. They were ready to demonstrate in protest, because they didn't really expect SCOTUS to “grant” their wish because they knew it wasn't something that had EVER been mentioned in the Constitution. But they failed to understand the depth of the Supreme Court's willingness to make their own law in today's liberal world, according to the whims of the liberals. I don't care if gays want to make a “contract” between them exactly like marriage, and enforceable like marriage,  but I resent the destruction of the WORD marriage by this action, without mention of there being no use of the WORD in creating their contracts. But that's what gays wanted: to change the very DEFINITION of the WORD “marriage." (Yahoo News)

Punish the "Deniers?"

Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (Dem-of course) hates opposition. Especially when it comes to global warming. He just can't stand it when smarter people than he point out the truth that global warming (or whatever AlGore is calling it now) is a swindle—a scam—designed tom put billions into Gore's pockets. A swindle that has been very successful, making Gore into a billionaire while he LIES to the world about man being ABLE to do anything about the climate, good or bad. Sen. Whitehouse (who, as a lawmaker, should know the Constitution forbids it) wants “global warming deniers” (people a lot smarter than him) to be punished for disagreeing with him. What a damned FOOL he is! This should make him unelectable in the next election, and maybe impeachable before that for stupidity. Whitehouse isn't the first politician to wish to punish people who disagree with them, and thank God we have a Constitution there to inhibit them.. (The American Spectator)

Tuesday, June 30, 2015

Destroying the Constitution

The very group that is supposed to be “protecting and defending” the Constitution is now in the process of DESTROYING it, little by little. The Supreme Court is doing it by MISDEFINING words such as “religious liberty,” putting people who are making religious decisions about gay marriage in the same category as the “Jim Crow” folks of old, making them into bigots for disagreeing with their edicts, even as they make their decisions completely in line with liberal wishes. They're basically saying that we “need to change our religious convictions” to conform to what they have dictated. Personally, I couldn't care less about what gays do in private. But I object strenuously to them REDEFINING the word “marriage.” They can have all the “contracts” they want between them, and have them recognized by law, but DON'T call it “marriage.” Unfortunately, that's what they want, and they'll be satisfied with nothing less. (Town Hall)

American Flag Is Next

If we allow them to BAN the Confederate Flag, by law, what's next? The Nazi Flag—the “Gay Pride” flag? Forcing the renaming of roads and bridges, etc., to forever eradicate the Confederate Flag image from the world? And if they get away with that, in spite of then first Amendment, The American Flag? Don't think that's possible? They're already demanding it, and some ignorant people are signing a petition to ban it. I wouldn't have thought it was possible for apartment owners to ban the flag from being flown in their complexes, either. But with all the liberals flexing their muscles today, anything is possible. The point is, if you give 'em and inch, they'll soon demand a mile. The Confederate Flag represents the “camel's nose under the flap of the tent, ending up all the way in, with the man who allowed it outside, shivering." In situations like this, many people “jump on the bandwagon” without thinking about the longer-range consequences, and end up screwing everything up before it's over. (Conservative Byte)

No Confederate Flag?

After the Charleston, SC massacre, the controversy over the “Confederate Flag” has arisen again, with Democrats being the biggest noise in favor of banning it. Which forgets entirely that, from the fifties on, the Confederate Flag was also the recognized flag of the Democrat Party. In his '92 presidential campaign, Bill Clinton even had a Confederate Flag PIN as part of his campaign paraphernalia, and the flag is still flying over the Arkansas statehouse, on his order, when he was governor. I don't believe we should BAN the flying of that flag, although I think Americans in their right minds should not DISPLAY it, because of what it represents. We don't ban the display of the NAZI Flag or the ISIS flag, but the same thing applies to that. Those who DO fly the Nazi flag are signaling their “solidarity” with Naziism. There should not be a LAW against it, but the ostracization it brings to those who display it is usually enough, except for those sufficiently feeble-minded as to display the flag of our enemies. (Washington Post)