Tuesday, August 23, 2016

What's WITH Them?

You'd think our politicians, as well as the media, would recognize the threat that comes from the radical Muslims and not appoint them to top positions in the government, while the press is “mum” about it. Not only that, they're committing mass suicide by siding WITH the Muslims in every case requiring a “ruling” for, or against Muslims. A good example is a bunch of Muslims who took jobs delivering BEER, then refused to do it. They were FIRED for not doing the jobs they were hired to do. They know their jobs would be delivering alcohol when they took them. So why did they? So they'd get fired and be able to sue. So when they were fired, they sued. And WON! The judge awarding them SIX FIGURE judgments!

Other cases where the wearing of Hijabs by women was prohibited at work, and even washing their hands for Muslim women nurses in hospitals, the Muslims were “winners” in their suits. It seems like the courts, and politicians are on the SIDE of the Muslims as they go about harassing us for the things that are natural to us. If they don't like how we live, why are they HERE? Not all Muslims are actively our enemies. But enough of them are, that decisions should go against them, but they don't. Did we favor the Nazis during WWII? Not even! Why then, do we tend to favor Muslims in so many things, while Muslims kill us off? Another example: Just writing this item can put me in the position of being accused of “Islamaphobia,” a phony designation invented by Muslims, to limit criticism, which one day may become LAW. (Just common sense)

Banning Ammunition

In Seattle, they gave a company a permit to import several thousand rounds of ammunition for their AR-15 rifles, and, after they were paid for and arrived, they “confiscated” (stole) them and designated them as “armor piercing” and thus ineligible to be imported for civilian sale. They can't just BAN guns, so they're working on excuses to ban all ammunition, making (only) legal guns USELESS. They're working all around banning guns, making them USELESS in the hands of law-abiding citizens, and impossible to get into action quick enough to successfully oppose the guns in the hands of criminals, who don't bother to obey such laws in using their ILLEGAL guns to victimize us. Their purpose is to make guns USELESS if they're legal, thus making us easy targets for illegally-armed criminals (including the ones wearing badges). This government is more afraid of HONEST gun owners than they are of criminals with guns. Probably because the politicians feel a “kinship” with the criminals. The guns held by government agents are “more legal” than ours. (760 KGMI)

"Common Sense Laws"

That's what the anti-gun fools always call the abortions they call “gun safety laws.” They refer to them as “common sense,” when they are anything BUT. “Universal background checks,” for example: where they are in force, just taking a gun and passing it around a room involves multiple “transfers” of the gun each time the gun passes from one hand to the other. And fees and a background check apply to each “transfer.” Gun-free zones are supposed to make sure nobody brings guns into a place that is so designated. But like ILLEGAL gun owners who aren't affected by “universal background checks” because they get their guns illegally and don't bother with that folderol, criminals don't bother to observe the ”law” that tells them they can't bring their guns into a “gun-free zone.” In fact, they SEEK OUT gun-free zones, in which to “do their dirty work,” because they can be pretty sure there won't be a gun there to oppose them.

Concealed carry laws like the one in one state that allows a person to carry a concealed gun, but it must be UNLOADED are completely stupid. What the hell good does an UNLOADED gun do you? Trigger locks, “safe storage,” and such are designed to SLOW DOWN a lawful gun owner in getting their gun into action when attacked by an ILLEGAL gun owner, and serve only to get the LEGAL gun owner killed, since the illegal gun owner is not burdened by such things, since he doesn't bother to OBEY laws. All these laws ONLY apply to LEGAL gun owners who DO obey laws, even though they are NOT the problem. It is ILLEGAL gun owners who do NOT obey laws that are the [problem. None of this is “common sense,” but that's how they refer to them. My “Take” is, if you have to CALL your laws “common sense laws,” it's because they are NOT common sense. (Just real common sense)

Monday, August 22, 2016

Going According To Plan

Obamacare was designed to fail. And it is beginning to come apart at the seams, right on schedule—or ahead of schedule. Several providers have announced that they're :pulling out,” because it's COSTING them money. Liberals say their only concern is MAKING money. And they're right. If they don't make money, they go under. They're not there to give you money. They're there to make money, and with Obama's “directives ( such as forcing them to cover pre-existing conditions, which is INSANITY!),” they can not only NOT do that, it COSTS them money, and that's the way Obama planned it. He revealed it in speech he THOUGHT nobody but his accomplices would hear, long ago. He told them he wanted a “single payer system,” but it would take a while to con the public into accepting it (He didn't use those words, but that's what he meant). That's what Obamacare is for. And it's working. As each provider drops out, there's more talk about a “single-payer system. Soon, it will begin in earnest, and work will begin on imposing it. And you can bet it will be MANDATORY. (Just common sense)

How Stupid ARE We?

Or better I should ask, “How stupid do the anti-gun fools think we are?” CNN recently introduced Mark Kelly, former astronaut and husband of Gabby Giffords, one of the most vocal ANTI-gun fools out there, who is right there with her” as she tries to take guns away from law-abiding people, as a “Gun owner and Second Amendment Supporter.” What FOOLS are they to think intelligent people would believe such OBVIOUS lies! Maybe fellow anti-gun fools are dumb enough to believe that crap, but intelligent people scoff when they hear it. Anti-gun fools constantly lie to us, because they don't have ANY truth on their side. But their lies are seldom so obvious and blatant. I guess they're in panic, since they have LOST most of their recent attempts to get more and more anti-gun laws passed. So much so that no less than Barack Obama has said he's “giving up” on getting any anti-gun legislation through Congress and will subsequently rely on “administrative” efforts. Meaning, of course, ILLEGAL efforts. which, of course, is a LIE, since Obama said it. (America's First Freedom)

FBI Incompetence

The anti-gun fools tell you that all we need is for everybody who wants to buy a gun to pass a background check, right? And the FBI will “check them out” and tell us which ones shouldn't be able to get a gun. Right? Then why did the FBI miss 9,063 people who “shouldn't have a gun” in just one year (2015) through incompetence? In S. Carolina, the FBI allowed the sale of a gun to a man accused of killing NINE people in a church! And many more people who should NEVER be allowed anywhere NEAR a gun were also allowed to buy guns. This is how well their laws work. Even the ones that MIGHT keep guns out of SOME hands, do not, due to sloppy work. Other laws simply work THE OPPOSITE of how they're intended to work. “Gun-free zones,” for instance, far from keeping guns out of certain areas, they are an open invitation to would-be shooters to come in and shoot the place up, since there most likely won't be any guns already there to oppose him. This is more evidence of the lack of foresight on the part of the anti-gun fools. Just ask the two cops who were murdered in a Panera Bread restaurant. All 1,800 or their locations are “no-gun zones.” (WLTX 19)

Sunday, August 21, 2016

He Didn't Ask Permission

And that cost him $6 .3 million bucks. Former Navy seal Matt Bissionnette wrote a book (“No Easy Day”) detailing the execution of Osama bin Laden and his lawyer told him he didn't need to ask the government to review it before publication. So the government sued him, falsely claiming he revealed top secret info in the book. Something they were forced to admit, later. Even so, the judge gave the government ALL the proceeds from the book, PLUS $1.3 million in legal fees for the government, who has plenty of money to pay for suing people who displease them. All because he didn't go to them, “hat in hand,” and ask for PERMISSION to publish the book. He has written a subsequent book (“No Hero: The Evolution of A Navy Seal”), for which he DID go to the government, properly “tug his forelock,”:and beg for permission. It has been approved, and so no suit is planned. Unless the “powers that be” change their minds later. He is also suing his former lawyer, who denied he ever gave him that advice not to ask for permission. (Guns)

"Obama: Founder of ISIS!"

Donald Trump said it, but he wasn't really serious. It was a little “gallows humor” the Democrats and other liberals aren't smart enough to understand. So, of course, they “went off the deep end” and even demanded that the Secret Service look into his “treasonous” statement. But what he doesn't tell you is that, even if Obama isn't “the founder” of ISIS, it was his action in “cutting and running” from Iraq that laid the groundwork for their rise to power. Until then, they were just a tiny “offshoot” of al-Qaida in Iraq, until most of his troops left, leaving all their arms and equipment for them to steal and use to kill people. The blood of every man, woman, and child they kill is on Obama's hands, and he can't wash it off. Deny it or not, Obama IS effectively the reason ISIS is as powerful as it is, today. Especially if he won't effectively fight them at all. And he covers up information about their outrages. He won't even admit they're a major problem in the world, while they “grow like a cancer.” (Just common sense)

Why Hillary Still Leads

Seems like every day Hillary's polls get better. She's now leading Trump in several key states. Sometimes by just a few points, other times by a wider margin, in spite of all the revelations about her criminal activities. If I believed the polls, I could only put it down to ignorance of her crimes by so many people who don't pay attention to politics until shortly before an election. But it's only partly that. Mostly, it's the polls “propping her up” by getting phony numbers, by asking questions guaranteed to get the results they want, or TAKING the polls in areas the KNOW are Democrat “strongholds.” This is how pollsters “manage the news.” By publishing polls that say what they want them to say, thus disillusioning people and conning them into either not voting at all, or voting for a minority candidate, which, in this election may as well be a vote for Hillary. And that's their purpose. (Just common sense)

Saturday, August 20, 2016

Another One Dead

This is getting ridiculous! The body count is growing again. Victor Thorn, a writer who had published three books about the Clintons, containing evidence “overlooked” for too long by the proper authorities, was found dead, they SAY of suicide. They don't say HOW he killed himself. Did he shoot himself in the head, TWICE, as one on BILL'S list was said to have done? What motive would a successful writer of 20 published books have? We need a fearless investigator, who can defend himself, to look into the high number of dead people who either displeased the Clintons, or were about to testify against them, and get to the bottom of WHY so many people connected to the Clintons have turned up dead under suspicious circumstances. I've written about this before, which might even cause ME to be found dead of suspicious circumstances one day. People look upon the list of such people as a “conspiracy theory, but there is GOOD EVIDENCE in the “manner of death” for many of them, as well as the timing. (Conservative Tribune)

How Stupid ARE We?

They tell us lies, and we believe them. Why? Because most of us “pay no attention to politics” until just before an election, when the lies are flying. And, since we (not me) know nothing about what they've done, and ARE doing, we believe their horse manure. But really! How stupid do they think we are? Even the most ill-informed people know that, when you want to set up a meeting for a “favored friend” to get a job, you NEVER set up a meeting with the PRINCIPAL of an agency. So when Bill Clinton's top aide sent an e-mail to Hillary's top aide requesting a meeting to give him a job, they use the excuse that Hillary herself, was not involved. Who do they think they're kidding? Do they think they don't talk to each other? They must REALLY think we're stupid, if they expect us to believe this horse manure. Do they really think Hillary would not be consulted? (American Thinker)

Is Driver's License Racist?

The liberals are unalterably opposed to making people show a picture ID in order to do the most important thing they do in their lives: vote. They call it “racist,” on the theory that most blacks can't afford a $5 fee to get one from their state. You have to show one to do many things. In some places to user a pay potty! The liberals demand one to get into the DNC offices! But it's racist to demand it to prove who you are and that you haven't voted before when you come in to vote. Does this mean that all black people who can afford to buy a car and are driving all over are without licenses? And they can't afford a license? I think their very objection is racist! Since it ASSUMES that black people can't afford one. Without voter ID there is no integrity in the election process, when someone can go to different precincts and vote multiple times, and even under different names. They object, because to require identification would make it harder for them to steal elections. That's how they got Obama in, and how they intend to get Hillary in, if they can. Hopefully, the sheer numbers of “new Republicans" (who didn't vote before) will overwhelm them. They're less able to steal an election that is not close. (American Civil Rights Union)

Friday, August 19, 2016

Wait for the Facts!

Yes, a cop shot this black man after a chase. But the man was armed, and had been fleeing the cops after they made a traffic stop on him.And he brandished that gun to the cops, pointing it at them. But in today''s world, where cops have a target on their backs, it's not surprising that cops might be very “nervous” in any violent encounter with a black man.This was this was a “righteous shooting,” but rioters are notorious for not waiting for the facts when they destroy property and hurt people. Word is that this demonstration, in which at least one cop car was destroyed, was “sparked” by “social media,” where people were exhorted to “hit the streets” and riot. Maybe that's not true, either. But nobody's waiting for the facts. They're just going out and destroying property and hurting people. It's almost becoming routine for this to happen when the cops have to shoot somebody. Nobody seems to care that the facts are not yet known. They just DESTROY. (The Blaze)

Obvious Contradiction

“Jackson Browne and Rosanne Cash are among dozens of musicians who will take part in “Concert Across America,” a series of 100 concerts to be held simultaneously in September to push for increased gun control measures and to urge attendees to vote for gun control-supporting politicians in November.” And all concerts are protected by ARMED security. Apparently these people, like all the anti-gun politicians, take their own security seriously enough to pay big money to have armed thugs surround them in case somebody tries to hurt them. But, of course, they think us “peasants” shouldn't have the same right if we can't AFFORD to hire people to carry our guns FOR us. People like Obama, Hillary, and all the other anti-gun politicians, hire people to carry their guns for them while they attempt to make more and more laws to either BAN guns altogether, or make them useless in our hands if we are attacked by ILLEGALLY-armed criminals, crazies, or Islamic terrorists. They think we :peasants” don't need protecting, like they do. (Breitbart)

It's Not Their Business!

Brits are still trying to disarm Americans. Apparently, they never learn. The last time they tried that, they got a bloody revolution and lost the colonies. But they're still trying, even though it's none of their business today, as it was not then. On Aug. 10, Britain's “Independent” published a story on the Internet, saying, “The Founding Fathers could not have foreseen the assault weapon.” Really? They didn't have to. The single-shot MUSKET was the “assault weapon” of their day, so they meant that. The same wording in the Constitution means the “assault weapon” of today, and their words about them are still operative. Yes, there are few reasons for individuals to have “assault weapons,” whatever that means. But what if a criminal or an Islamic terrorist comes at you with an “assault weapon?” If you don't have one to use in opposing them, you're dead. Apparently, anti-gun fools all over the world are still bent on DISARMING the American people. Making people DEFENSELESS against ILLEGALLY-armed “bad guys” seems to be their prime goal. (Breitbart)

Thursday, August 18, 2016

Betrayed By Your Own

The Army sent a young lieutenant with 10 years of honorable service (replacing a Lt. Who had been injured by the Taliban earlier) into a “hot zone” as the leader of the mission. They were advised that a number of terrorists were seen riding motorcycles in the area as “spotters,” to tell their friends where the Americans were so they could be attacked. They soon saw a bunch of those riders, who rode up on them, got off their cycles, and commenced walking toward them. They were told to stop. They didn't. So he ordered his men to shoot, killing two. A clear-cut case of proper enemy engagement in a war zone, right? Apparently not to his superiors, who, like most liberals, saw it in a different light. They relieved him of duty, released the remaining Taliban riders, and tried him for murder. Somebody there drank a LOT of “stupid juice.”

He's now facing 20 years in the slam because of somebody's stupid decisions. The other four members of the platoon, who were similarly charged, were told that, if they changed their stories and testified against him, their charges would be dropped. So, looking 20 years in the face, they changed their stories and testified against him, guaranteeing conviction. This is one way Obama is killing the morale of his soldiers, and making them very hesitant to shoot, in a war zone, where ANYBODY, including children, might be an enemy, ready to throw a bomb. It creates a “chilling effect” on our troops, that gets people killed and guarantees defeat. But that's his plan. He's using the same methods on this nation's police. Charging them with crimes when they were plainly only doing what they are paid to do.

This officer, who was convicted on the FALSE testimony of those four frightened soldiers who changed their stories to “get off,” is now being represented by United American Patriots (UAP), but they need money to mount an appeal. He was stripped of his pay and forced to sell his house. He also lost all his 10 years of Army pension. He's broke, while the army has all kinds of money to use in destroying this American hero. I don't usually use this blog as a fund-raiser. But I have no money to contribute to reverse this miscarriage of justice, and want to do something to help, if I can. All I can do is ask you for your help, if you can give it. You can send it to American Patriots, c/o Major (Ret.) Bill Donahue (USMC), P. O. Box 96565, Washington, DC 20090-6565. Please mention it is to help in the case of Lt. Clint Lorance. This is a legitimate organization and your contribution is tax-free. I hope you can help this man, who was victimized by Barack Obama.

Gun Control Equals Genocide

Don't believe it? Take a look at the “war” in Yugoslavia of a few years ago, where millions of citizens were told to “turn in their guns” to the UN, and they would be protected. They were NOT. When the army came in to kill citizens, the UN was asked to come to their defense. They did NOT. Their policies seem to have been to get things done without the danger of death or injury to UN personnel. So the citizens were left to die, without guns to use in defending themselves. And die, they did. Many who were refugees, tried to get help, and were massacred by the very people to whom they went for help. And the key to that genocide was “gun control.” The more guns that were taken from citizens, the more the “authorities” murdered and beheaded them. This is what you can expect from “gun control.” After “the war,” citizens were once again told to turn in their guns. Many did, and they died. But many more did not, and they will protect themselves if the “war” starts up, again. (Conservative Review)

Criminals, Watch Out!

Chances are much more possible for you to run into a citizen with a gun when you try to rob somebody. So be afraid....very afraid. If you try and hold up the wrong person, you could be dead—or at least, in prison. Because the number of “carry permits” that have been issue are is at record levels, with more than 14.5 MILLION people now licensed to carry guns for self-defense. And the “wild west” atmosphere anti-gun fools predict just will not happen. Most of them will just go about their business like usual, and the gun won't make any difference at all. They won't resort to killing people for slight irritations, or something simple like a fender bender. Most people are just ordinary, responsible people and, when they get a gun, they don't “get crazy” and shoot people for looking at them wrong, as anti-gun fools keep thinking. Nothing could do more to put a stop to gun crime than this, as I've been saying, right along. I have been a licensed carrier, and I've never killed anyone. (Shooting Illustrated)

Wednesday, August 17, 2016

Getting Her Own Medicine

Nancy Peelosi is complaining about the “nasty phone calls” she is getting since a hacker published the personal contact information for top congresspeople. Maybe she thinks she should be the only one who has the right to say nasty things about others, and nobody should ever be allowed to say anything nasty to, or about her. That's typical of arrogant politicians. They couldn't care less about what their voters think, but think others should be very “reverent” of their opinions. Nancy is top among politicians who should (and will) be sent packing when Trump becomes president. No, he can't “fire” her, but he can make her irrelevant. Even moreso than when her party lost the majority in the senate and she lost a lot of her power. Which probably made her cry. Poor baby! (The Blaze)

Easily Offended People

I was going to use the title, “EASILY OFFENDED AMERICANS” for this item, but then I had a thought: it's not just “Americans” that are easily offended. It seems like whenever you turn around, you're offending someone, and often, if even ONE person expresses “offense” at something, they take action about it. In some cases, it doesn't even NEED that “one person” to be offended. They take action because whatever it is MIGHT offend someone. Example: the Dallas Cowboys, who are making their players look silly, by making them wear PINK gloves and other pink equipment, to “honor” the breast cancer movement, yet they refuse to allow players to put a small decal on the back of their helmets honoring the cops! They're afraid of “offending” the Black Lives Matter crowd. I would not believe they were that stupid if it didn't actually happen. But today, it seems, EVERYBODY has taken a page out of the Muslim book and is “offended” by SOMETHING! Muslims are the most easily offended people on the planet. And what they get “offended” about are things that are common practices here. I say, if they don't like it here, they should go back to their Muslim hellholes and leave us alone. But they won't. There's a “method to their madness.” They're HERE to BE “offended” by what we do, to “soften us up” for those Islamic terrorists coming later to KILL us. (Just common sense)

An "Open Invitation"

The “no-gun rule” in effect at the Iowa State Fair is an “open, gilt-edged invitation” for anybody who wants to come there and shoot the place up, as is ANY “gun-free zone.” Aside from the Illinois law that allows “open carry” but requires the gun carried to be UNLOADED, this is about the stupidest thing they do; create “gun-free zones” where a potential mass shooter can be pretty sure there will be no guns there in the hands of possible victims. So he can go there and kill as many as he wants, and not fear opposition until the cops get there, AFTER he has killed or robbed a bunch of people, maybe including himself. They make a lot of STUPID laws, but the gun-free zone is right there at the top of the stupid list, with the Illinois “unloaded gun” rule at the very top. Then there are all the laws designed to slow down honest, law-abiding people in getting their guns in use when threatened by any one of the myriad ILLEGAL guns out there in the hands of criminals. (Des Moines Register)