Friday, November 17, 2017

It's an Epidemic!

Nowadays, all you have to do is SMILE at a woman as you pass by and she may accuse you of sexual misconduct. And way too many people will take her seriously and ruin your life over the accusation, with NO PROOF of any real sexual misconduct. This is not to say that ALL the accusations are untrue, but I am saying that women today are just too quick to scream sexual misconduct and ruin people's lives. The level of action that is deemed "sexual misconduct" is way too low these days. Example: Republican Roy Moore is running for the senate in Alabama and, just before the election, a woman came forward and accused him of sexual misconduct 40 YEARS AGO. And withohut any evidence of its truth, everybody seems to be taking the accusation seriously, and demanding he "step down." Meanwhile, Sen. Al Franken (Dumocrat) of Minnesota was PHOTOGRAPHED smirking, while reaching for a sleeping woman's breast.

In Colorado, TWO legislators have now been accused of sexual misconduct, and, right on time, several women have "come forward" to accuse them of similar actions. That's what always happens when a man is accused of sexual misconduct. Instantly, women, from whom we haven't heard a word about it, "come forward," also claiming sexual misconduct, also without proof. I'm not saying that some of those accusations are not true, but what I AM saying is that they have become all too common, WITHOUT PROOF. And way too many people take those accusations as gospel, and to hell with the subject being "innocent until PROVEN guilty." Just the accusation, in many cases, is enough to ruin a man (or a woman) forever, true or not. And it's all too easy to accuse them. I'm saying these women need to stop being so quick to scream "sexual misconduct," in the thinnest of "evidence." (New York Times)

Career Ender for Lynch?

Former AG Loretta Lynch was a consummate “party gal.” She'd apparently do just about anything the Dumocrats told her to do, hoping to continue as AG after Hillary won the election. Bill Clinton got on her airplane and told her to tell FBI Director Comey to start calling the Hillary Clinton e-mail investigation a “matter,” not an investigation, which she dutifully did, and Comey, blabbermouth that he was, told the world. Meanwhile, he first closed, then reopened that investigation, just before the end of the election, helping to ruin Hillary's supposedly “in the bag” election hopes. All three are now themselves under investigation. They've got their own special counsel to worry about. This investigation is a potential career-ender for both, since Hillary's plans came to naught. She didn't get elected, and both are now out of a job, and are potentially both subject to their own investigation. Prison may be the least of the things for which they're destined. (Zero Hedge)

Stabs Mom, Shoots Self

In Chicopee, Mass. A 15-year-old boy stabbed his mom to death and then used a gun to end his own life. But, how is this POSSIBLE? Like in Chicago, they have all those tight gun laws in Massachusetts! His mom shouldn't have even been ABLE to get a gun! But, as usual, all those tight gun laws don't do a thing to keep guns out of the hands of law-abiding, OR lawless people. Anti-gun fools will no doubt include this instance in their “gun violence” stats, even though the gun part was a suicide. They do that, you know, to make their stats look worse than they are. This again proves that all their ignorant gun laws do NOTHING to stop such actions. But do they pursue other means and methods? Nope! They keep making the same USELESS laws over and over, and get more and more people killed, since they're made DEFENSELESS in the face of all the ILLEGAL guns already out there in the hands of people who don't bother with permits or registration of their guns. (U. S. News & world Report)

Thursday, November 16, 2017

"Piling On"

The "Roy Moore Thing" is fitting a pattern. that pattern is women "coming out of the woodwork" to accuse him of unwanted sexual advances, based on the most nebulous "evidence," or no evidence at all. And these added accusations have been used by his detractors to intimate they are proof of the truth of their accusations, while they are not. If Moore is guilty, he should, by all means, "step down." But I have seen NOTHING that rises to the level of REAL proof. Only the UNSUPPORTED WORD of several women, who may just be looking for some name recognition or a payday. I have no brief for those who ARE guilty, such as Harvey Weinstein and others in the Hollywood cesspool, but I require REAL PROOF that the action really did occur. Everybody has been jumping on Moore WITHOUT that proof, as they never did on Bill Clinton or other Dumocrats, while their actions were real, and provable. I'm getting sick and tired of people "jumping on the bandwagon" in such cases, acting as if the charges had been proven when they have NOT. (Just common sense)

Punish Lawmakers

Why are there so many lawmakers who think they can get away with making laws that are patently unconstitutional and get away with it? So far, the only penalty they pay is for their unconstitutional laws to be declared so, and reversed, sometimes long after they have wreaked havoc among the people. What we need is a law that punishes MAKING such laws, in the first place. A two-tier law: one level for them UNKNOWINGLY making an unconstitutional law, the other for provable KNOWINGLY making an unconstitutional law. The Founders made a big mistake in not making it a CRIME to make an unconstitutional law and it will be difficult now to correct that mistake, because the very people who MAKE such laws have to vote to institute such a penalty upon THEMSELVES. But it has to be done, if we are to eliminate this scourge. (Just common sense)

Shutting Down A Politician

The wife of the police chief in Hartford, CT knows whereof she speaks. After an ignorant anti-cop politician made some particularly ignorant statements about cops in her support of a bill that, if passed, would further hinder the cops in doing their jobs, she sent her a letter. That politician referred to the cops as “cowboys with bats and guns” and said, “too many cops are killing kids and this has to stop.” In her letter in response, this wife told that politician that she was ignorant, and could not pass “situational training” and make the instant decisions made every day by a cop. That she should be ashamed of herself, and wondered how this ignorant politician even stayed in office with all her conflicts of interest and ignorant decisions. That cops had gotten into “shooting scrapes in Hartford only 20 times recently, and only killed one person in the last four years—and that shooting was entirely justified. Follow the link to read her letter completely. It's very satisfying to those who prize our police and wish them well. You know--those of us with intelligence. (Bearing Arms)

Wednesday, November 15, 2017

Pre-Judging Roy Moore

I expect this of Dumocrats, but not of Republicans. they're falling for the favorite Dumocrat dirty trick of accusing Roy Moore of sexual misconduct, based on NO real evidence, only the UNSUPPORTED WORD of a couple of women, some of whom may have been offered BIG MONEY to accuse him, just before the election that could make him a senator, or condemn him to the "purgatory" reserved for people whose careers have been ruined by unsupported accusations of sexual misconduct. This is a known tactic of Dumocrats--to accuse a strong Republican candidate of sexual misconduct, while IGNORING the very real (proven) sexual misconduct of one of the top men in their own party, whom they still revere. That man being Bill Clinton, whose sexual misconduct was displayed on the dress worn by the young woman from whom he got oral sex in the White House, and lied about it, under oath, before Congress. The Republican elites, like the Dumocrat fools, don't want Roy Moore in Congress because they're afraid of him, just like Donald Trump scares the "swamp-dwellers" to death, and for good reason. Whenever they hear either name, they wet their panties. (Just common sense)

Kim's Courting Death

Kim Jong Un is playing a losing game. If he wants to stay in power, and stay alive, he'll stop “picking at” the United States and start spending more money to make things better for his people, who are starving, while he spends BILLIONS on his missiles and nuclear research. There is NO WAY he can win a war against America, nuclear or otherwise. If he fires a SINGLE missile in our direction, he'll be dead soon after, while we shoot it down before it can get near us. If he wants to stay alive, he'll shut up about attacking us, because our retaliation will be immense. He will not survive it. If he wants to get millions of his people killed, okay. That's the only thing that has kept us from “taking him out” so far, and our patience is soon going to run out. It's not hard to keep track of his location, and one MOAB bomb will do the trick for him. He doesn't have enough nuclear bombs to spar with us, and we know where he is, at all times. (Just common sense)

"This Is War!"

That's what Florida Sheriff Wayne Ivey, in Brevard County says, when he told his citizens to “arm yourselves,” after another shooting in Orlando killed FIVE people. “Folks, now more than ever is the time for our citizens to be prepared to serve as the first line of defense, not only for them, but for their families,” Sheriff Ivey said, in his post on Facebook. He says, among other things, that they must be prepared to be “the first line of defense” in what constitutes a WAR. “What they (terrorists) don’t count on is being attacked themselves, having to become defensive to save their own lives,” Ivey argued. They don't count on being attacked in return, and having to worry about losing their own lives before the cops arrive to kill them. He told them that those precious minutes that go by before the cops can arrive can mean life or death for everybody who isn't armed, and he couldn't be more right. This guy is a “gem” of a police politician. He must be a former “cop in the trenches” to know so much. Police politicians usually aren't that smart. Some people applauded this, but others (fools all) said he was “fear mongering.” Since when is it “fear mongering” to tell people the truth that may keep them alive? (Fox News)

Tuesday, November 14, 2017

Who Divided This Nation?

The Dumocrats like to complain about "this divided nation," ignoring the fact that THEY divided it, and are working HARD to keep it divided, and to divide it further, They want to divide us into smaller "warring factions" that spend their time fighting each other over silly things such as, should we allow MEN to go into women's bathrooms and changing rooms, where there are often our young daughters, naked, because they say they "think" they're a woman that day and dress up like one. It is to their advantage for us to be divided as much as possible, because while we are fighting each other, they are stealing our country behind our backs. Anybody who pays any attention to politics whatever should be able to see this. Unfortunately, too many people PROUDLY "pay no attention to politics" until an election is approaching, and the lies are flying all over the place. This article goes into much more detail on this subject. (iPatriot)

"Who Ya Gunna Call?"

The fools we call “Black Lives Matter” are damned fools. They think we can actually get along without the cops. But who are they gonna call when somebody victimizes THEM? Some thugs they know who have ILLEGAL guns? What's in it for them? Do they go out, every day and try to do what they can to protect us like the cops do? The cop haters tell us that cops “go hunting” for blacks to shoot and kill. That's a damned fool notion and a LIE. Cops are there to PROTECT us, and they do. The only people they hurt are those who want to hurt innocent people, as a rule. Yes, there are exceptions, such as the Somali cop who was a “political hire,” and who killed an innocent woman by mistake, and the other cop who panicked and killed an innocent man who was simply trying to inform him he was legally armed. Things happen. But the BLM fools want you to think the cops do that ON PURPOSE. They do NOT. Those who do will be “weeded out.” Truth is, we can't do without the cops. Only FOOLS think we can. Fools who WANT us to do without the cops so they can rob and kill us without opposition. (Just common sense)

A "Study" for THAT?

A “new study” by anti-gun fools says, “Pro-gun people are motivated by fear.” And, of course, they used a NAZI to illustrate the story. They needed a “study” to prove that? For a change, they're right, but not in the way they think. Yes, people are scared—scared of being DEFENSELESS when faced by a “bad guy” holding an ILLEGAL gun. Their “gun laws” do NOTHING to stop criminals and other bad guys from getting their guns, but only stop law-abiding people from getting them for self defense, making it easier for the bad guys to victimize us. They have a RIGHT to be scared—I'M scared. At my age, criminals regard me as “easy pickings.” I want to disabuse them of that opinion—permanently. I want the tools to be able to do that, which is being denied me by the “powers that be.” Every law or regulation they make is DESIGNED to make it easier for illegally armed criminals to victimize me, and that infuriates me. (Truth About Guns)

Monday, November 13, 2017

Top Repubs Pre-Judge

Top Republicans are calling on Judge Roy Moore to "step down" because of an UNPROVEN accusation of sexual misconduct that has been denied by even the mother of the girl making the complaint. In this country, people are considered innocent until PROVEN guilty in a court of law, but Moore has been "tried and convicted" in the PRESS. And top Republicans have "bought the bullsh-t" and are now calling for him to "step down," even though the charges of sexual misconduct 40 YEARS AGO have NOT been proven. A woman's UNPROVEN accusation is usually believed, even if there is NOTHING ELSE to support it but her word--unless he is a Dumocrat, and then they "circle the wagons" in his defense, and make the woman accusing him out to be a trollop, looking for a payday The most memorable comment in that campaign is one commentators' crack about "dragging a $100 bill through a trailer park." The difference is obvious--except to those who "pay no attention to politics" until just before an election. And still vote. (Just common sense)

Who Will Protect Us?

Black Lives Matter blasts NRA videos and says it will “defend ourselves from [white -RT] gun-wielding racists.” Yeah, right! But who will protect US from BLACK gun-wielding racists? The ones BLM is working so hard to CREATE? Their rhetoric has already gotten the best part of 100 police officers killed from ambush. This subversive outfit STARTED the chant, “What do we want? Dead cops! When do we want it? Now!” And they really think some deranged individuals won't take that seriously and go out “hunting” cops? No, they're COUNTING on that happening. They're CREATING the very situation they SAY they're against: cops being more quick to shoot black people—now in self defense. Every cop that gets killed, they celebrate (at least in private). Their primary purpose is to get cops killed. And I'll bet some of their very “members” do some of the killing. They are domestic terrorists. (The Blaze)

Kardashian Gun Control

Kim Kardashian, like most anti-gun fools, wants ARMED security for herself, while denying it to the rest of us. That seems to be a “hallmark” of many anti-gun fools. One anti-gun columnist (now dead) actually SHOT at a teenager that he found using his pool without permission. Fortunately for the teen, he was a lousy shot. Many anti-gun politicians run around behind a WALL of armed thugs—again, while denying that right to the rest of us. Sen. Diane Feinstein, one of the most outspoken anti-gun fools out there, in ADDITION to her armed security, has her own gun permit, and carries her own gun. Such things illustrate the hypocrisy of the anti-gun crowd. They think there is no “disconnect” here, since some of them (Feinstein excepted) don't carry guns, themselves, but HIRE armed thugs for protection from “the masses.” All this in VIOLATION of the Constitution of the United States, which recognizes the inherent RIGHT of ALL Americans to be armed in self defense. (Daily Caller)

Friday, November 10, 2017

They're After Roy Moore

The liberals are after Judge Roy Moore with their phony accusations of sexual misconduct, based on nothing but the UNSUPPORTED WORD of a woman, and which is supposed to have happened 40 years ago! My question is, why the hell did she wait so long to accuse him? Why so it's just in time to hurt his chances to gain the seat formerly occupied by Jeff Sessions? Seems to me that if he were guilty, she'd have come forward a long time ago. And they say several other women have come forward, too. That's something else. It's not too hard to pay some women to lie about a sexual encounter years ago, with NO PROOF, to get a payoff. I say this is a liberal plot because it's one of their favorite CONS, to accuse somebody of sexual misconduct on the unsupported word of one or more women, at just the right time to hurt the man's chances for election, or even keeping his job at a television network. They've had some success recently, so they're doing it even more. For that reason, I don't believe ANY of those "timely" accusations unless some real proof is offered (Just common sense)

Kill Terrorists Now!

I'm getting very tired of the misfit malcontents who decide they're superior to the test of us and to kill innocent people who have done nothing to them, just to make an obscure and stupid point. Any Islamic terrorist (or any other kind) should be shot on sight if caught in the act. Any not shot on sight should be condemned to death without the usual appeal and counter appeals that allow him to live for another 20 years after his crime. He should be put to death by firing squad, using bullets dipped in pig dung or bacon grease before being loaded into the guns. The shooters should aim, not for the head, which is instant death, and not so very painful, but should aim for the midsection, guaranteeing he be "gut-shot," and will suffer a long, PAINFUL death. This punishment should not be restricted to ISLAMIC terrorists, but should be applied to ALL terrorists, if any other kind can be found. This sentence should also be applied to terrorists who only PLAN to kill innocent people to make their silly points, even if they're caught before they can implement their plan. This will send a message to future fools that they will die painfully if they even are caught PLANNING such an attack. That they will not be given a "show trial" where they can "have their say" before being convicted, while being coddled by liberals. (Just common sense)

Ignoting the Proof

In Alaska, Arizona, and Wyoming, they made laws that made carrying a gun, openly or concealed, legal without a “permit.” And gun murders PREDICTABLY dropped significantly. We told the anti-gun fools, and they yawned. It was like throwing a rock at a brick wall. It didn't even make a dent. Which is proof of something else: that they aren't interested in “reducing gun crime,” they're only interested in disarming law-abiding citizens, making it easier for armed criminals to victimize people. They'll deny it to their dying day, but that's the real life result of their stupid “gun laws.” They're trying now to stop people from calling it “gun control,” wanting them to use the term, “gun safety,” instead. A typical liberal way to change people's thinking through changing the words they can use. (Breitbart)

Thursday, November 9, 2017

This May be it

Computer messing up. This may be all I can get through until it's fixed.