“I don’t give a Rats ass, who this offends, but I stand by it. War is coming, sooner or later! You the Government!! You are all a bunch of cowards! You raised the cost of living so high that both parents are always at work, rather than spending time with their children (single parents stand no chance). Parents were told 'No you can't discipline your kids'. Well, now most of those kids are rude and out of control. You shall reap what you sow! We have taken a whole generation and turned them into selfish, entitled brats who have no respect for people, property or authority! You deem people with terminal illnesses and some with only a few months to live…fit for work!!! You allow our veterans of war to go homeless and hungry but give out millions to foreign aid!!! You save drug addicts over and over again but refuse to give free diabetic supplies to those who need them to stay alive. You bend over backwards to be politically correct, too scared to say enough is enough, in case you offend someone. You put the retirement age up so people must work until they drop. You take care of prisoners and give them everything under the sun (food, medical, education, representation, money, rehabilitation) yet you cause the elderly, those that have paid their debt to society and their families, to go broke caring for them either at home or in a nursing home... THINGS NEED TO CHANGE! Copy & paste if you have the guts! ( I am betting most of my friends don't have any guts, that's why so few actually read or respond to my Posts... Offended now? I don't need to be popular, I just need to be true to myself and my standards!) Written by T Pautz, my niece.
Friday, August 14, 2020
If I were a stoner, I’d want some of what the anti-gun fools are smoking. They can’t really believe their silly little anti-gun laws that only apply to LEGAL gun owners will have ANY effect on law-breakers, who obey NO laws. So what is their purpose? They either have an ulterior motive in disarming most honest, law-abiding Americans, or they’re stupid. Or they’ve lost their minds—if they ever had one. They can’t think they can actually violate the Second amendment to the Constitution with impunity. It says, “[The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.” How clear can you be? And the way to change that was designed to be difficult, so any would-be despot would have a helluva time disarming the people so he (or she) could “lord it over” us. So barring the possibility of a change to the Constitution, which is revered by all honest people, they don’t have a chance in hell to get around it with a simple gun ban. They’ve tried it, many times, and always failed. If they ever succeed, they will run into a brick wall. The American people will NEVER stand for a complete ban on buying and owning the means to self defense. Not when there are millions of ILLEGAL guns out there, in the hands of law-breakers. Are the anti-gun fools part of the law-breakers? Do they want to disarm us so they can victimize us? That remains to be seen. (Just common sense)
This Dumbocrat (Deb Stoner (-D of course) has gotten death threats. Or at least she SAYS she has, because of his anti-gun efforts. She’s living in dream land. Nobody wants to kill her, he isn’t important enough to kill. She thinks “the right” wanted a civil war if Trump didn’t get re-elected in 2020, but he’s wrong. Trump WILL be re-elected in 2020, so that idea is moot. Where there is a real fear of a civil war is if the Dumocrats (who have all said they would ban guns) are successful, there WILL be a civil war. Not over President Trump, but over the violation of the Constitution that would entail. It’s already brewing in the State of Virginia, where they are PROMISING to violate the Second Amendment. King Gorge learned, the hard way, that Americans will NEVER allow themselves to be disarmed. If laws are made to do that, they will join the law-breakers, and get their guns ILLEGALLY. It’s really easy to do, as the law-breakers have discovered. Whether that leads to all-out war remains to be seen. But that’s what I see coming. It’s not something the “right wing” WANTS, but it is definitely a possibility if the anti-gun fools are more successful than they have been, to this point. (Just common sense)
Thursday, August 13, 2020
It seems to me the liberals are doing everything they can to make life easier for the criminals in our society. First, they want to disarm all honest, law-abiding people to make them defenseless against the criminals. Next, they want to de-fund or abolish the police so they can’s protect us. And they’ve always wanted to disarm the cops, too. Next, they want to abolish prisons altogether. But failing that, they want to release as many violent prisoners as they can. The consequences of that are obvious when you consider a recent story where they released a rapist from prison, and he went right out and murdered the lady he raped. Everything they espouse seems to be something the criminals want. Why is that? Do they feel like the criminals are their “homeboys?” Are they planning on doing criminal acts, themselves and want no interference from law enforcement? I wonder why they’re even taken seriously with some of their demands by people with any degree of intelligence. Abolishing the cops is the work of imbeciles. Abolishing prisons at the same time just compounds the idiocy. And disarming the victims makes them easy targets. What are they up to? We should get rid of any politician who espouses such damned foolishness, imprisoning him/her for stupidity. (Just common sense)
It's just a rumor, this time in Trinidad, Colorado, and more calls for useless, restrictive gun laws. Laws that restrict the right of honest Americans to carry guns for self-protection while criminals still get their guns easily. It’s easier for a criminal to get a gun where gun laws are the tightest because criminal gun sellers flock to places where gun laws are the tightest. They know the local criminals will need many more guns to victimize those honest people who OBEY the laws that say they can’t be armed. They just never learn: the tighter their gun laws become, the more criminals use guns to victimize unarmed people. The looser gun laws are, the less crime there is because honest, armed people keep it down and criminals know that, so they stay away. If politicians learned this simple lesson (too simple for them, maybe?) the “gun problem” would go away in an instant. Robert Heinlein said, "An armed society is a polite society." But they don’t want that. They simply want to disarm honest people and they’re doing it. (KKTV)
Yes, the Obama administration did a good job of convincing this country his people killed bin Laden just before his re-election. But did he really? Or did he just set it up try to look like he did to give himself a boost in getting re-elected for another four years, so he could screw this country up even more? Some people say that’s true, but I don’t think so. I say that because since then, we haven’t heard a peep out of bin Laden, and if he were still alive the terrorists would be moving Heaven and Earth to prove it. Videos showing him, moving around, showing the front pages of newspapers with dates evident. There would be terrorist “events” done in his name. Everything they could to convince us we were lied to. Al Quida would be very active, and he would be very visible in every terrorist act. Yes, I believe bin Laden IS dead—maybe not at the hand of Obama’s agents. Maybe he got killed in some other way and Obama just took advantage of that. I notice they made quick work of getting rid of the body so nobody could perform an autopsy, saying they were “observing Muslim customs.” As if they should do so with a bloody murderer responsible for the deaths of many thousands of innocent people so he could make a political point. There had been an announcement at least ten days earlier in some newspapers that he had died of natural causes, since he was already in poor health. (American Thinker)
Wednesday, August 12, 2020
I have heard, far too often, a riot described by liberals as a “peaceful protest,” which is upheld by law. My absolute favorite is when a TV reporter talked about the “peaceful protest” behind him while over his shoulder you could see “demonstrators” setting a business on fire. That reminded me of the time when Saddam Hussein’s PR man told us, on camera, that they were okay, that America’s armed forces had been “beaten back,” while an American tank rolled by behind him. These things show me just how stupid some people can be. Liberals WANT to describe riots as “peaceful protests” so they can criticize the actions of the authorities in breaking up the riots. Just as they lie everywhere else to fool the public. They have to. If they were to accidentally tell the truth, they would ruin the plans of, and for themselves and other liberals. A “peaceful protest” is only peaceful if demonstrators are NOT breaking people’s property and hurting people. Setting fires to people’s property, and that sort of thing. In Seattle, violent rioters are now SUING the city because the cops had the temerity to actually DEFEND themselves against their violence. Violence committed while liberals described it as “peaceful.” (Just common sense)
There’s a big difference between ignorance and stupidity. Ignorance is a simple lack of knowledge. People who act in simple ignorance can be forgiven for the damage they do. Stupidity is when you have that information, and still act in ignorance. That’s why I use the word “stupidity” so often to describe the anti-gun fools. They have to know their anti-gun laws do not work, in any way, to stop, or even slow down “gun crime,” but they just keep on making them, while they get people killed. Every time some fool goes out and shoots someone, the anti-gun fools jump right up and insist more and more laws be made to make more people defenseless against all the millions of illegal guns that are out there. Meanwhile, they ignore all efforts to convince them of the only real solution to “gun violence,” and that is to allow the law-abiding to have their own guns, with which to defend themselves from people using those illegal guns to victimize them by killing them when they try. That will “reduce gun crime,” one shooter at a time. Another thing they don’t understand, or pretend not to understand is that their laws get people killed, by making them defenseless. Meanwhile, they go about, pushing their anti-gun nonsense, followed by armed security. (Just common sense)
The Constitution is the BASIS for every law that is made. They have to conform to the guidelines set out in the Constitution, or they are not laws, at all. The anti-gun fool movement IS against the Constitution. Every law they make that “infringes,” in any way, on our right to be armed, IS unconstitutional. That’s a given, But it’s something the anti-gun fools refuse to understand, as they go about scheming to find more and more ways to “make inroads” on your constitutional right to be armed, for self defense. The unfortunate part of it is, even unconstitutional laws can be, and are, enforced, until they are DECLARED to be unconstitutional by the Supreme Court. Usually long after the damage is done. Property is taken, people imprisoned, fortunes lost, and people die. People are “branded” as felons for breaking those unconstitutional laws—even though they are not laws, at all, eventually. The only people I can see who gain by taking the ability to defend ourselves away from us are the “government agents” who will eventually victimize all of us if we ever attain complete gun control. As well as the criminals and other law-breakers who have no trouble getting their ILLEGAL guns. If any politician tells you that you don’t need a gun—you need a gun. Get rid of him. (Just common sense)
Tuesday, August 11, 2020
Hank Williams Jr. said this, and I want to repeat it for you: “If you are offended by something then leave it alone. Cracker Barrel offends you, then eat somewhere else, but I like it so leave it alone. A statue offends you, then don’t go see it, but I like to see them as my history, so leave them alone. Don’t like meat, then eat vegetables but let me eat what I want to. Don’t like Gone With The Wind, then don’t watch it or read the book, but I like them, so leave them alone. I like worshiping God, but you are offended, so don’t go to church, but let me go. I read the Bible, but you are an atheist and want Bibles banned. So don’t read it, but don’t say I can’t. Leave it alone. You don’t like the names of military bases, but I do, so leave them alone and stay away from them. You don’t like the police force, then don’t call them when you are in trouble, but leave them alone so I feel safer having them. Why are the things you want so much more important than what I want? Are your demands greater than my likes? Is it because you use intimidation, blackmail and force to get your way- that you do? Let’s make a deal. I will leave what you like alone and you leave what I like alone and the world will be a better place for everyone.” (Copy and paste cause it’s exactly how I feel!! ENOUGH already people!!!) Thanks to my nephew Bob for this.
In Chicago, many would have no social life if it were not for attending the funerals and wakes for previous victims of shootings. Recently, in “tight gun laws” Chicago, 13 people were wounded while attending a “memorial party” for a previous gunshot victim. This shooting was described as “an isolated incident,” although how they figured that, I don’t know. This comes amid Chicago bragging that “gun crime” had gone down 14% so far, in Chicago. Only about 475 people have been killed through December. Not mentioned is the possibility this shooting was gang-related, but it was noted that it occurred in a “high-crime area,” which usually means gang activity. Recently there was a day in Chicago where NOBODY was killed by a gun, and politicians bought a lot of champagne to celebrate. Only in Chicago. I’ve got a nephew who lives in Chicago, and I’m always worried about him living there, even though he doesn’t live in one of those “high-crime areas.” Hopefully he doesn’t have reason to pass through one, though. Gang members killing each other aren’t very good shots, and they don’t care how many innocent people they accidentally kill. The Chicago cops attribute their problems to “too many guns on the streets.” But that’s wrong. The problem is too many FOOLS on the streets with ILLEGAL guns. (Mail News)
Friday, August 7, 2020
Reports to the contrary are a bit premature. I’ve just been in the hospital for the last 2 weeks while they took care of some “bleeders” in my intestines. While they were at it they took care of a few other items, and I’m actually still in a rehab facility (no, not THAT kind). Posts may be a little spotty until the 15th, their estimated day I get to go home. But I’ll do my best.