Media Lies Again

They’re portraying Obama as the “gas price savior” because he “announced” he was going to release oil from the Strategic Oil Reserves. He hasn’t even DONE it yet, but they’re saying he’s going to be responsible for a drastic reduction in gasoline prices. What they don’t say is that releasing these reserves will make the difference of a few pennies for about 30 days. Then they’ll go back up again, probably higher than ever. What he could do that would REALLY bring them down is to GET OUT OF THE WAY of drilling and new refinery building (There hasn’t been a new one built in more than 30 years, and the old ones are beginning to crumble). Those that are still in business can’t get enough oil to refine. He says we’re “drilling more than ever,” which is a typical Obama LIE. (Rush Limbaugh)

And They Wonder Why It's Getting Worse

Obama Will Make Taxpayers Guarantee Mortgages Without the lenders Checking Borrowers' Incomes or Employment. Just like before the 2008 election when the 1976 law that forced lenders to loan money to deadbeats was first in force. It’s STILL in force with Fannie and Freddie again keeping the lid on until they need another “bump” in the bad economy. They FORCE them to loan money without regard to their ability (or non-ability) to pay it back, while now FORCING the taxpayers to guarantee the loans. The economy predictably gets worse, allowing Obama to say the free market doesn’t work so I’m going to change to socialism. Making loans to people who cannot pay it back is a “recipe for disaster” and one that forced the banker in Ayn Rand’s prophetic “Atlas Shrugged” to “zero out” his businesses and disappear to avoid being FORCED to do it. He started his own little town in the mountains of Colorado (he could do it in the time this story was set) run on his own ideas of economics, aided by John Galt’s “perpetual motion machine” invention. But we don’t have such a giant of finance today who can start a “strike of “the men of the mind” and destroy the liberal’s economy so we could “start over” with economic ideas that WORK. (CNS News)

I Guess I'm A "Hater" Then

Southern Policy Law Center (SPLC) says, “If you’re not left-wing, you’re a hate group.” Oh gee, I guess this organization has the right to label everybody else but themselves . Frankly, from what I see, it’s the LEFT that is the “hate group.” There; I have as much right to brand others as a “hate group’ as the SPLC does, so I guess the left IS a “hate group.” Where the hell does this group get off branding people as a “hate group” because they don’t agree with them? This a sign this organization needs to be voted out of office as soon as possible. Oh; I forgot: you can’t vote a “hate group” out of office. You can just refuse to send them any more money and they will “wither and die.” (World Net Daily)

UN Wants to Regulate Anything It Can

Anything it can con its members into ceding to them. Regulating planetary food and water sounds innocent enough, but what happens if, while “regulating” planetary food and water, they decide to put “strings” on it? If they “regulate” it, and withhold food and water until we do what they dictate, what does that make them? Don’t give them any more power than they now have. To do so is to create your own disaster. In fact, we need to get RID of them, altogether. They’re certainly not good for anything. They claim to be here to “keep the peace” in the world, but have they? Any time? What about the countries in which UN operatives have been screwing little girls under duress? What about the other atrocities UN people have committed? (Cowboy Byte)

Feds Block Taxas Law Requiring Picture ID

I have to show a picture ID to get a driver’s license; to buy insurance; to buy a pack of cigarettes; to get into certain buildings, INCLUDING Eric Holder’s Justice Dept. building. To do many things: so many things, in fact, that I no longer even think about showing it. Everybody gets ONE VOTE. But nobody is required to show “proof of ID” to exercise that right; to PROVE they are, in fact, who they are, and to guard against voting many times. A person could go from voting place to voting place voting many times, and I’m sure some do, without this requirement, which is simply a way of VERIFYING their identity. Except in Texas (and Indiana), where there’s a law requiring picture ID to be allowed to vote. Or there was, until Eric Holder, an un-elected bureaucrat, decided to BLOCK that requirement. What are the Democrats AFRAID of? That stealing elections will be harder for them to accomplish? They SAY it would be “hard on Hispanics.” Do they mean those Hispanics who are here illegally who CAN’T legally GET a picture ID? (Reuters)

What's Next?

Gays want to use the term “marriage” to describe their “arrangements.” I have nothing against their “arrangements,” but not under the name, “marriage.’ They’ve been offered everything they want EXCEPT the use if the term “marriage” and have turned it down. Some people say if that’s allowed, what’s next? “Marrying” their dogs? Apparently, one guy in Canada thinks that would be a good thing. He calls his dog, “my girl.” I’ve heard of guys calling their girls “dogs,” but this is ridiculous. I look for guys like this to be pushing for laws to allow them to “marry” their animals, soon. (The Blaze)

No Guns Involved

The anti-gun freaks hate it, but the most recent school killing happened in Chicago, WITHOUT a gun involved. So they can’t use it in their passion to get rid of every gun they can in the hands of good, honest people so they can use them to stop such things as this school killing, with a KNIFE. I’ve always wondered about the stupidity of people who think a LAW will stop a CRIMINAL, who breaks the law DAILY, from having a gun. All their laws do is give criminals a steady stream of unarmed victims for them to use their illegal guns to victimize.(Breitbart)

"Equal Justice" Under the Law

Last fall, a Muslim attacked a Pennsylvania man named Ernest Perce who had dressed up like Mohammed for a Halloween parade. The attack was caught on film, witnessed by dozens of parade watchers, and verified by a policeman. The Muslim was charged. But when he was brought before Cumberland County Judge Mark Martin, the judge dismissed the assault charges against the Muslim and dressed down the Pennsylvania man for being insensitive to the Muslim religion. Not only did Martin rule in favor of the Muslim attacker, he lectured Ernest Perce for insulting Islam: "Islam is not just a religion, it's their culture. It's their very essence; their very being… And what you've done is, you've completely trashed their essence, their being. They find it very, very, very offensive. I find it offensive." Would this judge say anything to a Muslim who trashed the Christian religion? I don't think so. He's too stupid. I find his finding offensive. (Thanks to Conservative Byte.com)

What About Americans Killed By Taliban?

The Taliban in Afganistan have vowed “revenge” for the Afghans supposedly killed by an American soldier whom Afghan “witnesses” (who might be Taliban themselves) say just “started killing people for no reason.” I doubt it. He was probably defending himself from a Taliban attack and accidentally hit some women and children while doing so. Or the Taliban themselves killed them so they could blame it on that soldier. This is classic PR stunt of the kind usually used by the Taliban and other kinds of Islamic terrorists (Sorry, PC Police, I use my own choice of words. I don’t allow others to choose them for me.). My question is, how do you tell the difference between Taliban and “civilians?” You usually can’t, except the Taliban are probably shooting at you. (Detroit Free Press)

Fast & Furious

This should be a defining moment in politics and the men responsible FIRED, including Obama: the government “running guns” to the Mexican drug cartels and getting a Border Patrol agent KILLED. This is NOT “just” a political thing. It’s Brian Terry’s DEATH, and Obama is ultimately responsible because it couldn’t have happened without his knowledge and approval, no matter how much he may deny it—if he’s ever asked, which I doubt. The thug he’s got in charge of the DOJ says when he found out about it he STOPPED it. But when did he find out about it? Didn’t something like this REQUIRE his approval BEFORE it was done? If he didn’t know about it, he is INCOMPETENT, as is Obama. But neither will ever take the blame for this man’s death. Mark it. (Mary Chastain/Big Journalism)

Congress Passes Obama Impeachment Bill

But there has been no action on it i the Senate. I guess they’re hoping they can stall it in the Senate until after the election, hoping Obama will win and he can better quash it. One thing always in Obama’s favor is the tendency of Congress to “drag their feet” on anything “controversial.” But what’s “controversial” about impeaching Obama? The subject of this impeachment is but ONE reason we have to impeach this travesty of a president. What about spending more of (our) money than there IS on his “flights of fancy” masquerading as “green energy companies? Companies who quickly “take the money and run? Companies whose people have donated millions of dollars to his campaigns. Obama’s scam is so transparent we can all see how he is paying back his contributors by giving BILLIONS of OUR money to them while they go bankrupt and never pay it back while we can’t touch them because of the bankruptcy laws. Well, he DID promise to be “transparent.” And why is our source for this a patently conservative one? Because you’ll never read about this in the liberal media. (Conservative Papers)

What's WRONG With These People?

We’re suffering under extremely high gasoline prices and environmental idiots are still working to BLOCK any attempt to drill, anywhere, any time. In Erie, Colorado, a town so small they have a double-sided sign reading “Welcome to Erie” on both sides, they’ve banned “fracking” anywhere near town. Other towns in Colorado, including Longmont and Boulder have done likewise. I expect such stupidity from the “People’s Republic of Boulder,” but not from Longmont and Erie. I’ve always thought they were smarter than that. But apparently they aren’t (The Denver Post)

Town Hall Spikes Arpaio's Report

I can’t figure it out; why would Town Hall, a CONSERVATIVE outfit, “spike” Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s report that PROVES the “birth certificate” Obama released was a FORGERY. On the one hand, they rail against Obama and his refusal to release many of his records of his early life, including his birth certificate, but on the other hand, “spike” an article that PROVES Obama’s up to something and really MIGHT not be eligible to be president of the United States. I don’t know if they DID “spike” it, but if they didn’t, they should take steps to return it to their site. It’s VERY popular and its disappearance raises many questions—ones I’d rather not have to ask of the site that hosts one of my blogs. (World Net Daily)

Is Watching Muslims Wrong?

Muslim extremists murdered 3,000 innocent Americans on September 11, 2001. Since then, many people, almost ALL of them IDENTIFIED as being Muslims, have tried to murder more “in the name of Allah.” There have been countless murder attempts, some successful, some not so successful, with the perpetrator shouting “Allah is great!” At Ft. Hood, a Muslim SOLDIER took a gun and killed a lot of people and was even carrying a card saying, “Soldier of Allah.” A Muslim attempted to murder a Danish cartoonist for drawing a PICTURE of Mohammed. A Muslim tried to murder the POPE. What ELSE do we need to justify keeping a close eye on Muslims in this country? They’ve proven a penchant for using “deep cover agents” to kill people. People who are told to do nothing untoward, make no noises about “Jihad,” etc. until the time comes for them to act, who when captured spout Muslim extremist phrases. Watching Muslims is NOT a bad thing; it is COMMON SENSE and logic. Watching them closely is the only thing that has kept them from “overrunning” us. We’re not “rounding them up” and putting them in concentration camps as we did the Japanese under liberal FDR. We’re merely “keeping an eye on them.” There’s nothing wrong with that, and never will be, so long as militant Muslims continue to kill innocent people for not believing the same way they do. (Daily Mail)