Friday, August 22, 2014
I wonder how many more autopsies they’re going to do, searching for SOMETHING to make that “gentle giant” into an “innocent kid.” There were THREE autopsies of the “gentle giant” who was assaulting the cop who tried to stop him from walking in the center of the street after he had strong-arm robbed a convenience store for a pack of cigars. They tried to make us think he was just a kid all excited about college, dancing up the street. Then came up the video of him bullying the clerk in the store, whose head came up to about his belly button and they had to change the narrative. Obama wanted that video suppressed, so he had Holder refuse to let locals release it. But it got released, anyway. So they did another autopsy, hoping to find SOMETHING they can twist into something to damn the cop. But that didn’t work, either.
So yet ANOTHER autopsy was planned. That boy in a man’s body must look like he was in a massive pileup by now, with his organs in jars all over the autopsy room. They tried to say one of the bullets was fired from the back, but the coroner wouldn’t cooperate, saying it was POSSIBLE, but not probable. Why they’re doing this, I don’t know. Maybe it was a ploy to inflame the “race issue” yet again, as the Treyvon Martin case did, Obviously, that’s why Obama got involved. The cop didn’t know he had just strong-armed a convenience store clerk, but HE did. And being accosted by a cop right after, he KNEW, in his mind, he was in “big trouble,” so he tried to beat up the cop, who was half his size. It had worked on the convenience store owner, why not on the cop? But the convenience store owner didn’t have a gun, and know how to use it. The cop did. Oops! (Fox 2 Now)
It seems to me that we know absolutely nothing about Michael Brown, the “victim” in the police shooting in Ferguson, MO. In most cases, within a couple of days, SOMEBODY in the news media (Fox, if nobody else) gives us “chapter and verse” on the “life and times” of the central figure in the story. There has been no such effort in the case of the death of Michael Brown. The way he “strong-armed” that store clerk while stealing a pack of cigars (testified to by his accomplice, who ultimately admitted his lie), tells me he was used to doing such things, using his “bigness” to intimidate people and “running roughshod” over people. If so, there should be some “intel” about it, somewhere. SOMEBODY knows about it if he has done things like this before. In one picture he is shown flashing some “gang signs.” WAS he a gang member? Was he used to doing things like this “strong-arm” robbery of a convenience store, bullying people smaller than him? SOMETHING will be there to find out. So why doesn’t some “intrepid reporter” go out and find it? Maybe most of them just aren’t interested in what they might find, or Fox just didn’t think about it. Is the uproar about his death originated by his fellow gang members if he IS a member of a game? (Just common sense)
Three guys went into a home in Indianapolis, hoping to score big. They did, but not in the way they had planned for this home invasion. Inside were two well-trained and well-armed men, who knew how to repel invaders. There are now only two left in this gang as they “ran for the hills.” They haven’t been seen or heard from since. The third member of their gang is dead at the scene. Once again, guns in the hands of HONEST people stopped a crime and took at least one criminal off the streets, putting him in a cemetery. That’s the price you pay if you screw up, as these ill-trained gun bearers did when they invaded this home. They didn’t do their homework, and one of them died. It’s a good start. (Guns Save Life)
Thursday, August 21, 2014
Terrorists in Iraq made a BIG mistake when they started beheading children, and another when they started kidnapping and beheading journalists. They wanted to make us mad, and HAVE they! It may be a fatal mistake for them, because it took them out of the “freedom fighter” category and placed them squarely in the “murdering thug” category, and Americans have never been known to “back off” against such people. We’re “coming back,” folks. And we’re coming with all guns blazing. They think they’re going to give us “rivers of blood,” and they’re right. But it’s going to be THEIR blood. Obama may TRY to “limit” what our soldiers can do, but I predict that’s going to be impossible. They’re going to go over there and “whip up” on those fifth century fools. If any are left alive it will be because they were hiding too well. Any we can find are going to DIE. We will find most of them, and it will be a horrible death. Terrorists think our air strikes are bad for them, but wait until they meet up with ANGRY American soldiers who will not be deterred by “rules of engagement” and will follow them to their “nests.” NO longer will they be able to escape death by throwing down their arms when they meet up with a superior force. They will NOT be sent to GITMO and eventually released by our stupid president. They will be shot on sight. I just wish I was not “old and broken” so I could go over and kill a few. Every single one of them needs to DIE. (Town Hall)
Is that how they’re going to refer to the unarmed white teenager a cop shot in Salt Lake City, Utah, the other day? They refer to the cop who shot him as “not white.” When did it become a sin to say a man is “black” or “white?” Are they trying to hide the fact that a “nonwhite” cop shot a “not black” unarmed teenager? Do they know how that sounds when circumstances between the two shootings are so similar? They ARE different, though. That “not black” teenager in SLC had not just come from a strong-arm robbery. He was just “diddy-bopping” down the 7-11 parking lot listening to his “tunes” and the cop put a gun in his face and told him to “get on the ground!” Having his “tunes” up loud, as teenagers do, he couldn’t hear him, so he didn’t INSTANTLY “drop to the ground,” so the cop “blew him way.” Meanwhile, the “authorities” refuse to talk about the race of either party, while those in Ferguson EMPHASIZE the “race factor.” There’s something SYSTEMICALLY wrong, here. (World Net Daily)
If a Democrat loses an election. It MUST be voter fraud—at least, according to them. But if a Republican loses one by vote fraud, Democrats call him a “sore loser.” This was perfectly illustrated in the election AlGore lost. They tried to “move Heaven and Earth to reverse what was plainly an honest election. Then, when it was certified to be honest, they tried to “move the goal posts” by complaining that Bush LOST the general vote, but WON the Electoral College vote, and that was wrong—because THEY lost. That’s how it has been done, by LAW, since the beginning. But if a DEMOCRAT won that way, they’d shrug their shoulders and say, “it is what it is,” so just accept it. It’s happening now in the election between Thad Cochran and Chris McDaniel. There is incontrovertible PROOF Cochran STOLE the election, but they don’t expect that to change things. They’re so frightened of the Tea Parties that they’ll do ANYTHING to keep a Tea Party-backed candidate from winning. Both parties work TOGETHER to keep Tea Party candidates out of office. And that’s a hard combination to beat. (Last Resistance)
Wednesday, August 20, 2014
And nobody does anything. No rioting, no looting, no visits by the governor or the attorney general of the United States, no visits by Al Sharpton or Jesse Jackson, nothing. Oh, the cop who shot him is described as “other than white.” We don’t know if he’s black, or Philipino, Indian (oh, forgot: ¨native American”) or maybe INDIAN Indian, or maybe Hindu, or even Muslim. I don’t know. They won’t tell us who he is. There’s no “governmental lynch mob” demanding his scalp. What’s the difference between this and what’s happening in Ferguson, MO? The victim is white, and the cop is “other than white.” This guy was shot dead because he didn’t instantly obey the cop’s commands (he was wearing earphones and couldn’t hear him). Cops will not say whether or not there was a gun (besides the cop’s) on the kid or near him, along with not revealing the murderer—er. uh, cop’s name. This case is more clear-cut than Ferguson, but apparently nobody cares (except his brother, who witnessed it) about an unarmed white kid being killed by an “:other than white” cop. In the story, there wasn’t a single mention of race. Mostly because the victim was white, I guess, and the shooter was “other than white.” (Inquisitr)
That’s plainly what’s going on in Ferguson, MO. A cop who has NO record of racism defends himself against a “small-time hood” who uses his size to “run roughshod” over other people, just TAKING whatever he wanted by INTIMIDATING people until he ran into a cop who refused to be intimidated, and shot him after he tried to beat the cop’s head in. People (mostly people who didn’t live there, but flew in quickly) rioted on the basis of what ONE guy (who was Brown’s ACCOMPLICE) said about what happened (and against TWELVE witnesses who said he was doing his duty), and are now calling for the INDICTMENT of this cop, who was only doing his duty and defending himself. Even the GOVERNOR of the state (Nixon) is calling for an indictment, PREJUDGING things way before all the facts are in. The Attorney General of the United States (himself a criminal) comes in to “investigate” the case and will no doubt “chime in” on the calls for the “head” of this cop. That’s funny: a CRIMINAL investigating a COP! You’re a “dead man” when a criminal, who sits at the “right hand” of the PRESIDENT calls for your punishment for doing your duty. (Just common sense)
Robert Reich, once the Labor Secretary (under Clinton), is well known for his criticism of rich people. People who are still earning their riches, of course. He never utters a peep about “old money” inheritors who have never done a real day of work in their lives and never worry about where their next meal is coming from, is today making (not “earning”) $242,613.00 a year ($20,217.00 a month) for teaching—wait for it—ONE class. Next year, he’ll be teaching four classes, and they will probably increase his salary accordingly. He talks big about “income equality,” but doesn’t practice it much. How many of YOU earn $20,000.00 a month? (If you do, he will criticize you.) Apparently he doesn’t practice what he preaches, getting this kind of money for ONE class in a tax supported (of course) college.
Guys like Reich always “land well” after their stint in government. He probably steered a lot of money (above or below he table) toward this college when he was in Clinton’s administration. Take a look at just about EVERY former government official and you’ll find somebody with a cushy job, working for the very people he/she “regulated” when in office. It’s routine. In 2013, he made a “fiery” speech to an “occupy” group, saying the Tea Parties were out to destroy the government and make Americans fearful and angry toward one another. Typical liberal fare that lies through their teeth. What the Tea Parties want is to get rid of people like him and take back our country from liberals, who seem to have a strangle hold on our government today. They want to free us from fools like him. (The Daily Caller)
Tuesday, August 19, 2014
I listened to every word spoken in the press conference by those who performed the second autopsy on Michael Brown, and it was NOT said that Brown was shot “from back to front.” Want WAS said was that it was “theoretically POSSIBLE” that he COULD have been shot from the back to the front at ONE TIME during the shooting. Nothing equivocal. When a man is being shot several times sometimes he “spins around” in place and SOME of the bullets enter from the rear. That does NOT mean he was “shot in the back.” This sounds to me like the kid’s family trying to twist the findings to CRIMINALIZE the cop. What I saw was a BIG thug terrorizing the people in the convenience store, attacking a cop when he thought he had been “caught,” and getting shot for his trouble. I think they need to take a LOT more time to analyze what happened in Ferguson, MO and stop “leaping to conclusions” and giving the “out-of-state” thugs who are making the demonstrations violent, ammunition. They’re giving Obama more ammunition for his drive to worsen race relations in this country, too. (Daily Caller)
The effort to CRIMINALIZE Texas Gov. Perry’s action to get rid of a drunken prosecutor is even being called “sketchy” by some DEMOCRATS (liberals), which is a “weasel word” for BOGUS. Among them are David Axelrod, who was a top political advisor to Bill Clinton. Republicans are a bit more definite in describing it as a “political witch-hunt.” Notice the people pushing the “indictment” are Democrats, who hate Perry with a passion, since he has hurt their shenanigans many times. This is a major effort to discredit Perry in the future, particularly in 2016 as he runs for president, again. Perry being president is obviously a “bitter pill” for them to swallow and this is a “shot across his bow.” Any news story about him from now on will contain the words, “indicted former governor,” even if the charges are thrown out as silly; which they will be, unless it comes before a wildly Democrat judge. (Daily Caller)
In Armada, MI, a local teenage girl was murdered, which instigated a massive “investigation” that included violating the civil rights of everybody on the roads around the town. Cops set up roadblocks in three places, effectively blockading the entire town. Stopping and questioning EVERY person they could find about their destination, where they came from, etc, writing it all down, and holding up traffic for hours. This is a good example of cops using a dastardly crime as an EXCUSE to violate everybody’s rights. Worse, I suspect they didn’t come up with anything concrete from these roadblocks after wasting everybody’s time and money while stepping on their right of movement. This action came an entire WEEK after the girl’s body was found, after the murderer had ample time to be elsewhere. (PoliceState, USA)
Monday, August 18, 2014
I have nothing against the cops—as long as they do their duty to PROTECT us and do not look at us as “the enemy.” I’ve been watching with trepidation as the federal government pushed all kinds of WARFARE equipment onto local cops, sometimes in the smallest of communities—and sometimes FREE. The latest evidence of police overdoing it is in Ferguson, MO, where (I believe) a cop shot a giant thug in self defense (a “witness” said Brown was standing with his hands up, but the “witness” was his accomplice in the earlier robbery), but the “locals” got all bent out of shape and started to riot. Instead of doing all they could to AVOID violence, the cops came in with all guns blazing, using all their federally supplied military gear, looking like the “storm troopers” they are, shooting tear gas and flash-bang grenades and rubber bullets (that CAN kill) into a crowd of innocent civilians, acting like an invading army. And I think that’s what it is. Obama thinks he sees the strong possibility of a revolution brewing and, since the “Posse Comitatus” prevents him from using the military against American citizens, he’s turning the police agencies of America into an army who will be able to “legally” repulse American citizens if they revolt. Count on it: if there’s a way to “get around the Constitution,” Obama will do it—or at least, try it. (Claire Wolf) This was originally published on JPFO web site, but I think we crashed their server. This is only part of it, but there’s a link to the rest, and it may be back up by the time you get to it.
Only Obama has to “take a break” from his vacations. That’s what he’s doing tight now as “air strikes on Iraq and violence in Ferguson, MO intruded on his golf and beach plans.” Poor baby! It is suspected he did this so “spike criticism” of his “being on vacation” during multiple crises,” but that’s the last thing I would do. His presence in Washington would not make much of a difference because he knows not what to do in either case. I’d just as soon he REMAIN “on vacation” if that meant he was not “fiddling with” my freedom and money. I’d never criticize him for staying away from Washington if he weren’t spending millions of dollars of MY MONEY to do it, and if he didn’t spend a lot of that money for communications so he could still DO some “fiddling” while on vacation. A more INCOMPETENT president I don’t think I’ve ever seen, so the more he is on vacation, the better, in my estimation. (Mail Online)
It was easy. The previous administration WELCOMED illegal aliens, gave them food and shelter, even cell phones. And that resulted in a flood of illegals coming in to take advantage of their “generous” welfare system. Australians got tired of the “line jumpers” and threw out the previous administration. Now they no longer welcome them, and even fly them home free. That costs some money, but not nearly as much as ACCOMMODATING the illegals previously did. We could similarly solve that problem by doing the same thing. But we will have to get RID of Obama and his accomplices before we could. Obama has CREATED the “illegal immigration” problem we now have by WELCOMING them, as did the previous Australian administration. Yes, Bush did something similar, but not nearly so much. Obama has “gone nuts” with it. (World Net Daily)
Sunday, August 17, 2014
What will it take to make people “rise up in anger” and kill every Islamic terrorist they see? They’re so used to the unspeakable atrocities committed by Muslim extremists (I think) that they’re now inured to it, or they’re just afraid. You see a picture of a headless corpse of a small girl in a pretty blue dress, a pile of dead CHILDREN on the stone-strewn ground, and the half a body of a five-year-old cut in HALF by an Islamic terrorist. Does this kind of thing infuriate “average” Muslims? Does this make them angry enough to kill the murdering bastards who commit such crimes? Apparently not. They come and go among the Muslim population who allow them to use them as human targets and murder their children, rape their wives and daughters (no matter how young), and kill whole families. Why? Because they don’t BELIEVE the exact same way they do. NO other reason. I’m getting to the point where I can’t differentiate between innocent Muslims and these bastards. I just want to KILL them. Sorry about the language, but I can’t find any other words harsh enough to describe them. And Obama is sending them BILLIONS of OUR dollars! Thank God I’m no longer subject to the censorship Town Hall put on me when I published The New THOMA$ REPORT on Town Hall.. (World Net Daily)
That’s what University of Phoenix was told by California bureaucrats. They were told that they had “exceeded their quota of veterans” enrolled, and could enroll no more. This, in AMERICA! The “land of the free and home of the brave” now discriminates against VETERANS! Under the LAW! I presume there is SOME KIND of a LAW involved, but I don’t know. The way Obama’s government operates, that’s not sure. If he wants to do something, he just DOES IT, laws or not. Frankly, I don’t think such a law exists, because what member of Congress would MAKE such a law? Maybe Obama “used his pen” to make a REGULATION to cover it. And don’t tell me because it is a STATE action, Obama is not involved. Many times in the past have STATE ACTIONS been prompted by something Obama wanted. (University of Phoenix)
Three of four panelists on “The View” the other day said that women should get themselves a gun for self defense, The only dissenter was Lara Spencer, visiting from “Good Morning America.” I notice Whoopi Goldberg was conspicuous by her absence this day. Maybe she just didn’t want any part of the subject matter to be discussed and took the day off. Whoopi (whose name reminds me of breaking wind) is a real “firebrand” and is KNOWN for her anti-gun sentiments. So maybe that was a good move on her part. I’m surprised the producers of that ultra-liberal show would let this on the air. Maybe they wanted to make us think they were “fair and balanced,” which they are NOT. (Media Research Center) Sorry: apparently this was "taken down" before I could use it.
Saturday, August 16, 2014
I wondered, the other day, where Jesse Jackson was in the Ferguson, MO contretemps, and here he is! Now calling the death of Ferguson thug a “state execution.” Better late than never, I guess. That description would not hold if you consider that “state executions” do not include the executee beating the hell out of a cop when he’s twice his size, and the cop is alone. That picture of the store owner confronting this thieving bully was funny, in a way. It didn’t even slow this giant down as he “stiff-armed” the owner as he pushed his way out of the store with his “loot.” HE knew the cop was likely there to arrest him for that strong-arm robbery, though the cop was not yet aware of it. So he started beating the hell out of him, before he even was able to exit his vehicle. He was lucky the shot fired IN the car didn’t “do for him.” But he continued to menace the cop, who was not yet joined by his brother officers, and who shot in defense of his own life. Now they want the death penalty for that cop. So all his friends (and all the outside race-whores) came in and looted everyone, including the store this kid had robbed. It was a riot CREATED by them, as well as military-style cops who arrived and overreacted. The outside looters are still looting, without police opposition. (Politico)
America, and other countries have laid on many sanctions to Russia for their actions in Ukraine, which led to the downing of a civilian airliner and the killing of 295 innocent people. Now Russia has promised “retaliatory measures” in response. But Russia doesn’t have the resources to hurt any of those countries in any major way. The only countries he can hurt are those already in his sphere of influence. Putin is running a bluff. Russia is not nearly as strong today as it was at the height of the “cold war,” and their “retaliatory measures” aren’t going to do them much good. Any such measures will elicit a similar response, which will CRIPPLE Russia. Putin has his chest pumped up BIG, but it’s just not big enough, any more. (Just common sense)
That’s one of the more insidious things in Obamacare. One of the things Nancy Peelosi said we’d have to vote the act into law to “find out what’s in it.” Giving DOCTORS orders to question patients about their gun ownership. And if the doctors disobey, they can probably be disciplined. The same way they’re forced to tell “authorities” about possible child abuse in their young patients, if they have ANY suspicion it might be there, even if they don’t think it is. That’s so CPS can then harass the parents unmercifully, as they’re wont to do. For my part, if my doctor asked me about guns, I’d tell him to “screw off” and if he insisted, I’d get a new doctor. (Breitbart)