One of the things Obama did was to attempt to strip the Second
Amendment right from elderly people who ask for others to handle
their finances. He translated this into a means to take their guns
away, even though just asking for help with their finances do NOT
cause them to be "mentally unstable," as Obama's new rule
suggested. That this is an OBVIOUS unconstitutional act goes without
saying, and it should not have taken a LAW to undo this outrage. But
thankfully, there is now one, if President Trump signs it, now that
the House has passed it--which is what it will take. Anybody want to
take a bet on whether or not he will sign it? Under Obama's rule, all
it took for their constitutional right to be denied was approval of
an unelected bureaucrat. And it required a long and expensive appeal
process for it to be reversed--something a person in the "evening
of their life" can ill afford, as a rule. This Obama rule was
"elder abuse." But I guess he figured that he abused
everybody else, so why not them? (Washington Examiner)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment