Mueller's Final Statement

He couldn’t find evidence that Trump was guilty of ANY crime, but he refused to “exonerate” him. Hey, Bob! That’s not what prosecutors do! If they cannot find evidence that the subject is guilty, they are constrained from saying so. Not so with Mueller. He must make his statement so ambiguous that Dumocrats can “jump on it” and “keep investigating.” Jerry Nadler says he will keep on looking for ways to prove President Trump’s “crimes” and “lies.” Which is much like that long ago sheriff’s statement that, “We will try this bloody murderer before we hang him for his crime.” The Dumocrats will continue to hunt for evidence of a crime in Trump’s actions, and if they can’t find it, they will make it up. They “know” he is guilty of SOMETHING, they just can’t prove it. They pinned their hopes on Mueller finding evidence of a crime on President Trump’s part, and he let them down, although very gently, leaving them room to claim there WERE crimes, but they just couldn’t prove it. Something a normal prosecutor cannot do, but which Mueller did. The evidence of an attempted coup is so obvious, it’s a wonder charges haven’t been filed on many Dumocrats. But they’re Dumocrats, so charges are not likely until Trump’s investigations are finished. And that frightens Dumocrats, no end. (New York Times)