Battle of the Dynasties

It seems to me we're constantly suffering under the thumb of one dynasty or another. It was FDR for many terms; then they altered the Constitution to keep that from happening again. Then it was the Clintons—and lastly (for now) the Bushes and Obama. Obama is a “dynasty” all by himself. He has single-handedly done more damage to the United States than ANY president in the past. But I digress; now we're faced with the possibility of an election that represents TWO different “dynasties:--the Bushes and the Clintons. We have had the maximum TWO terms for each, and are now faced with the specter of a THIRD term for either the Clintons or the Bushes, Hillary seems to be the one the DEMOCRATS want to foist upon us, whether we want her or not, with Jeb Bush being said to be the “anointed one” on the Republican side. If there's one thing we don't need, it's another DYNASTY president—on either side. There are too many other good candidates “in the wings” that the Democrats have already falsely discredited, such as Sarah Palin, whom even REPUBLICANS believe (falsely) can't be elected, which is really STUPID. She can not only GET elected, but will get rid of a lot of the “chaff” and “deadwood” among the GOP, which is what frightens them. (New York Times)