"Beyond My Competence"

That's what the Director of the Homeland Security Agency says. Which tells me he is in the wrong job. Anybody who can't understand a simple amendment like the Fourth doesn't deserve to run the Homeland Security Agency. He's too stupid. And he ADMITS it! So maybe he's not so stupid, after all. Just INCOMPETENT, like most of his colleagues in DC. It's SO simple: you can't invade a person's home and personal space without a warrant. You can't search his private papers without “probable cause.” What is there about that he doesn't understand? If he DOESN'T understand that, he should RESIGN, immediately. He's not qualified to hold that position. Of course, that could be said for most of the top office holders in DC, starting with Obama. (American Thinker)

"Biden Fever"

The American Spectator says, “Biden fever is growing as Hillary becomes less and less viable as a candidate." If Biden is all they've got beyond Hillary, they're in REAL trouble! Biden is best known as “The King of Gaffes” because every time he opens his mouth he slips his foot in it. And the ideas he spouts are about as stupid as they come (like his advice to take a shotgun and “fire a warning shot” to run criminals off, which only served to get charges filed against some good people). The only thing Biden accomplished as VP was to keep Obama alive, even with all his crimes and scandals, as nobody wanted to contemplate him as president if somebody killed Obama. But for him to run on his own hook? Unthinkable! He's only second to Hillary herself as a person least wanted as president. I think the Democrats are in big trouble if the Republicans come up with ANYBODY worth while to nominate. I say “please, PLEASE nominate him to run!” That will GIVE us the election for sure. Unless they steal it, as they did before. (Minutemen News)

"No Place In Church"

In Lansing, MI, one priest thinks ALL members of his church should be armed, at all times, And that means bringing their guns to his church. He's even willing to teach a class on gun safety IN the church. But his Bishop doesn't agree, and as Bishop, he has the authority to shut this priest down and get some people killed. He says all Catholic churches are “gun-free zones,” and that's not going to change. Yeah? Even if some yahoo comes in and starts shooting one of his churches up? Not possible, you say? It happened in Colorado Springs, Colorado not too long ago. And if it were not for one small woman parishioner who was carrying a legally-carried gun, it could have been a massacre. In fact, the shooter DID kill two people before he even got INTO the church. That Bishop is as short-sighted as are ALL anti-gun fools. They want us to WAIT for the cops to come. But that's stupid. While the cops are on their way, the shooter can kill a lot of people. An armed person there that the shooter didn't know about can (and does) make all the difference in the world—and DID in that Colorado Springs church. Guns DO have a placde in church, in a defensive capacity, to protect churchgoers. (Guns)

Incredibly STUPID Criminals

The riots in Baltimore disgust me. Not because they're happening, but WHY they're happening. They SAY they're happening because of the death of a guy named Freddy Gray at the hands of the cops. I don't think so. I think Gray's death is just an EXCUSE for the gangs to go wild, looting and stealing, and hurting people. They're so incredibly stupid they think they can “take out” the cops and forever have their way with the populace. That's about as stupid an idea as I've heard. Do they think that if they steal enough, and hurt enough cops, they'll just “go away” and leave them to their own devices? Not a chance. If the gangs get the upper hand, cops will rush in from everywhere, bringing their “big guns,” and wipe them out. They think the cops will never start shooting them, but if it gets bad enough, even the most gentle of people will be standing right behind the cops saying, SHOOT 'EM! And gang members will die. The ones who don't die will go to prison for the rest of their miserable lives. And peace WILL ensue. (Just common sense)

Demonstrating vs. Rioting

Peaceful demonstrations are legal under our system of law. Riots are not. What makes the difference? The intent to damage and loot vs. the intent to educate. There's a classic example of that in Baltimore right now. The mayor said we need to give them room to demonstrate, and for those who want to destroy, room to do that, too. That last part is wrong. And STUPID. We need NEVER to “give them room to destroy.” Those who want to destroy are simply CRIMINALS, taking advantage of a volatile situation to do their dirty work. The same was true in Ferguson, MO. Yes, there were some there who really believed the lies told by the other thugs present, but the biggest number of “demonstrators” there were IMPORTS who just wanted to rampage and LOOT. The difference is obvious: if they concentrate on looting and burning, they're CRIMINALS, and should be “apprehended.” A good example of that is the guy who cut the fire hose in Baltimore to make it more difficult to save the CVS building, which other criminals set on fire so they could loot it.(Just common sense)

Tying Their Hands

Obama 's “rules of war “tie the hands” of his soldiers behind their back in dealing with Islamic terrorists. One of the “rules” is that they may not fire on a terrorist or terrorist group until, or unless they fire first. That may seem “fair” in a non-war zone, but not where everybody you see might be an enemy combatant. Another is that you can't fire on a child (children being defined as a teenager or younger). But that same “child” can fire a gun as well as any adult, and in this particular war zone, they are taught, from BIRTH, to hate Americans and that killing them is okay, according to their “religion.”

I suspect my own brother had to kill a nine-year-old child in Vietnam right after the kid blew his sergeant's head off, just to stay alive. So why do we have to “give them the first shot?” I've no doubt that instruction alone has caused many American soldiers to be killed before they even know they're under fire. The attached article talks GENERALLY about “rules of war,” and one sentence alone stands out for me. It is the one where they say, “The only way evil people can be stopped is by other people willing to be more vicious, more violent. Violence wins wars.” Which serves to illustrate the complete stupidity of government spokesperson Marie Harf when she said, “We can't win this war by shooting people.”

What? How STUPID is that? A crack about war by someone who has NEVER been to war and doesn't know her rear end from her nose about war. And we should LISTEN to her? What we should be doing is removing all those limiting “rules of war” and tell them to simply “Shoot anybody who has a gun pointed at you, whether or not they fire first. Bring 'hell fire' down on the enemy.” Make them KNOW that to shoot at an American will mean their DEATH, in the most painful way. Believe me: if we don't “ramp up” our response to our enemies in this war overseas, soon we'll be fighting it right here in our own streets. And I guarantee you if that happens, I will not “give them the first shot.” You can depend on it. (Guns)

Full of Himself

I've always known some politicians are really “full of themselves,” but rarely does one have the stupidity and temerity to state it publicly. Eric Holder is such a stupid politician. He MUST know that a majority of Americans who are not taken in by his rhetoric and the rhetoric of others (mostly Democrats) are aware of his many CRIMES as Attorney General, Most of them come simply from refusing to enforce laws that are on the books, while ENFORCING the ILLEGAL “rules” set down by Obama. Yet now he says, his tenure will “go down in history as 'the golden age' for the AG office. How “puffed-up” and “self-important” is that? That was my “laugh of the day.” In reality, if they ever get a REAL Attorney General in office, this guy will end up in prison. The same would apply to Obama if our laws represented reality. But a “golden age?” Not hardly. A "Stupid Age," maybe. Somebody with the power to do so needs to launch a REAL investigation into his actions as AG and put HIM in prison, where he belongs. (Weasel Zippers)

Bush Pushed Too Far

Up to now, George Bush (the younger) stayed with the usual thing to which most presidents adhere, not to criticize his successor. But Obama must have “pushed him too far and, “In a closed-door meeting with Jewish Donors Saturday night, former President George W. Bush delivered his harshest public criticisms to date against his successor on foreign policy, saying that President Barack Obama is being naïve about Iran and the pending nuclear deal and losing the war against the Islamic State.” Which is the nicest possible way to say that Obama is “giving away the store.” If I were in Bush's position, I would have spoken up loudly long before now. Bush doesn't want to get back into politics, but he says he just could NOT keep quiet while Obama ruins us. (Sweetness and Light)

"Speech Fees" A Scam

The Clintons prove it. There is NO SPEECH worth $300,000.00 to $500,000.00. But that's what Hillary and Bill get each time they agree to spew nonsense such as “toppling American rich” (which, even if it were possible would be a CRIME), and are paid that money BY the “American rich—the only people who HAVE that kind of money to throw around in order to “BUY” politicians. And buy politicians they do, disguising it by calling it “speech fees” they pay to politicians they think can, and WILL do them some good in the future. The Clintons have it better than most, since BOTH benefit from the thinking that Hillary may be our next president and will be able to help those companies make billions more, simply by signing something into law.

But the Clintons aren't the only politicians to work this scam. Almost ALL politicians do it, all the time. Just about EVERY political speech where the speaker gets more than a “travel cost” fee is a bribe for that politician. In addition, people like AlGore use the same process to push their individual swindles. Al's is “global warming,” since renamed (because the original name wasn't working any more) to a sufficiently neutral name so that he could attribute ANY weather anomaly to his swindle and make himself some more billions. The Clintons have done this regularly since they left the White House, and have become multi-millionaires between “speech fees” and advances to write books nobody wants to read, and do not buy. There are many ways to bribe politicians, and these are two of them. (Just common sense)

Telling It Like It Is

The opening paragraph in this article by Prof. Walter E. Williams is this: “Forget for a moment the ever-failing economy, the implosion of our foreign policy coherence, and our virtually unilateral withdrawal in the war on terror under Barack Obama's presidency. If liberty lovers don't start fighting back soon, we'll forfeit our freedom of thought and religious expression under the assault of fascist leftist activists in our culture.: That pretty much says it all, in my opinion. If we don't get rid of Obama soon he will have “given away the store.” He's almost done it, already. Meanwhile, we're arguing about whether two people of the same sex can “get married.” Something that might be somewhat important to THEM, but is of NO importance to most of us. It's something put put there to divert our attention from the looting that's going on in Washington, DC. And one of its most important points is how leftists PUNISH people who dissent from their “orders.” (CNS News)

"No Greater Threat?"

“Than global warming.” (or “climate change,” Or whatever they're calling it today. They had to change its name when it was proven the globe wasn't “warming” and hadn't been for a long time.). That's what Obama is now telling you, proving he has “bought” AlGore's swindle, hook, line, and sinker.” There hasn't BEEN any “warming” for 18 years, but he thinks it is our single biggest worry. Forget about “mad Muslims going wild and killing everybody in sight, even other Muslims, because they don't approve of how they believe. And it is, mostly by FOOLS pushing it to put money in their pockets or to gain even more power over what you do WHILE putting more money in their pockets—which is Obama's goal. Look for him to keep pushing it even AFTER he leaves office—if he ever does.

He might even USE it to have an EXCUSE to remain in office. Gore even wants to PUNISH people like me, who can see through his swindle and say so. Now even the NSA is “getting into the act with their “creepy” waste basket mascot. He looks strangely like a blue “Sponge Bob Square Pants.” Look for Obama to come out with some “penalties” for “global warming deniers,” even if they are unconstitutional. But when has he ever worried about the Constitution? (The College Conservative)

$15.00 An Hour Minimum STUPID!

You'll hear a lot about raising the minimum wage to $15.00 an hour from many politicians (mostly Democrats, where most of the stupidity is). They just can't understand economics. You can NOT pay a person more then he/she is worth and stay in business. Flipping burgers or pushing buttons on a computerized cash register is just NOT WORTH $15.00 an hour. And that kind of a job is NOT for people with families to raise. That job is for BEGINNERS in the workplace. More experienced workers should go elsewhere, or try for a supervisory job, which DOES pay more. You can't MAKE such jobs worth that kind of money, even by making a law. The employers will just lay off or fire people, and raise their prices. If that doesn't work, they'll go out of business. But I think that's what Obama wants, which is why he and his “followers” push it so hard. Then he can blame it on capitalism, when the blame is HIS. But he's well known for blaming everything bad on somebody else when HE created it. (Just common sense)

Williams Has It Backwards

Juan Williams says the NRA is “Whipping white America into hysteria over gun control.” by promoting “self-protection from crime” as a reason for gun control. Funny; that's the MOST IMPORTANT reason for carrying a gun. Self protection from criminals and crazies who already HAVE their guns, ILLEGALLY. The NRA does fall for a phony premise by promoting guns for “sports purposes.” Hunting is just a SMALL part of it, self-defense is the biggest part of it, and you can't minimize it by simply saying so. In actuality, it is OBAMA that is “whipping up” BLACK “race hatred” of WHITES every time he gets a chance. And his “followers” do likewise. And they're succeeding. Black thugs everywhere are taking that as SUPPORT for them to kill--white (and black) cops. The black cops because they consider them traitors to their race. Which is a RACIST position, but you'll never convince them of that. Racists (on both sides) are never deterred by reality. I'm sorry I supported him when NPR fired him tor not “toeing the liberal line.” (Breitbart)

"Open Season!"

The Police Chief in Austin, TX says, “Open carry is “open season” for armed criminals and extremists!” WRONG! It is this kind of thinking that is what's wrong with the whole IDEA of “gun control” these days. All their kind of “gun control” does is create an “open season” on UNARMED citizens who OBEY laws. Criminals do not. And what ignorance makes this cop think a LAW will stop them from getting their guns ILLEGALLY, as they do now? Only an armed populace that does not wear a uniform and are thus not known to be there will stop armed criminals from holding “open season” on honest people by shooting back. And the more criminals they KILL will bring crime stats down in a hurry, as has been PROVED in many places. One of the silliest things gun grabbers do is hold “gun buy-back” programs where criminals bring in old, barely serviceable guns, then take the money they get and buy better guns on the black market while the cops and politicians congratulate themselves on “getting guns off the street.” (Guns)

Criminal Government Takeover

I've just figured it out. ( I knew it for a long time, but it has just recently “come together” in my mind in its totality). Obama is not just an “opportunistic politician,” he's the “top Capo” in the criminal takeover of our government. He (or the people behind him, I don't know which) run the group that RUNS this mob. They “fixed it” so he could come in, shove the “inevitable candidate,” Hillary, aside, so he could “rule” for the eight years it would take to destroy this country from inside. As he continues to appoint Muslim after Muslim to important positions in our government—positions that can continue after he is gone; after he appoints many questionable people to other important posts, such as Attorney General and Secretary of State, and many other positions that weren't noticed by his “lap dogs” in the media.

Then some of his “lower level thugs” do things like battering their way into the homes of Republican contributors, stealing their property, and telling them they can't “breathe a word” of it to their friends, or ANYBODY, with impunity, I see a pattern developing and I think it began when Obama “crawled out from under his rock” and “took over,” pacifying Hillary by giving her one term as Secretary of State, to keep her mouth shut until he could consolidate his power with the promise she could be the next president if she promised to follow his orders. But fortunately the whole thing hinges on the Republicans not putting any “roadblocks” in his way, as they haven't so far. And Republican voters staying ignorant of what he's REALLY doing. But those voters are showing signs that they won't be cooperating—which might mean the next eight years under a REPUBLICAN administration, which would be a lot harder for him to control.

Another thing that will “throw a monkey wrench into his plan” is the abysmal stupidity of people like Hillary, who told the “rescue mission” to Benghazi that COULD have possibly saved those four important lives to “stand down.” Something she steadfastly denies, while Obama puts people who were THERE under a “gag order” so they can't reveal what REALLY happened without taking the chance on going to a federal prison. This is all strictly my OPINION, but it is based on many FACTS. His loyal allies in the liberal media keep painting Hillary as yet again the “inevitable candidate, HOPING all her own scandals will not ruin her chances. But they're wrong. She's just too “scandal-prone” to ever get elected, and further she has nothing to offer except to “topple the rich,” which means NOTHING. The proof is that Democrats are looking a little more closely at "Ol' Joe" to be the next president (Oh, God!). (Just common sense)

207 Gun Laws In Congress

That’s way too many, and it illustrates the “wild abandon” of anti-gun fools making laws all over the place with no knowledge of whether or not they will actually DO anything to reduce gun violence. Nor do they care. “In the current 2013-2014 congressional session there has been 207 laws proposed related to firearms. The vast majority of these bills will never see the light of day and were introduced as nothing more than a political move by the sponsor. But unless we watch carefully, a bill that seems to have no chance of passing can unexpectedly become law.” It really goes to show the complete “out of control” nature of gun haters. They don’t care what the law says, if it limits our right to have and use the means to self-defense, a gun. They don’t really care about gun violence, they just want to ban guns any way they can. (Mississippi Gun News)

HIllary: "Change Your Religion!"

That's what she wants to MAKE us do to support baby murder. She says we're going to have to have (force) people “change their religious beliefs” to support abortion. What an arrogant bi-ch she is! Infanticide is MURDER! It's against the law! (Maybe not liberal laws, but that doesn't count.) But she wants to violate the Constitution in order to FORCE it on us. Who the HELL does she think she is? For my part, Hillary can blow it out her blow-hole! At whichever end of her it is. I make ALL the decisions regarding religion for ME. She doesn't get to even ASK me to change my beliefs, WhatEVER they are! If she thinks she will ever be ABLE to, she's a total damned FOOL! But then. We know she's a damned fool, anyway. She tells us that every time she opens her front blow hole, just by the STUPID statements she makes. (Liberty Alliance)

Must Run Anti-HAMAS Ad

Pamela Geller (“Atlas shrugs” blog) tried to run an ad on the MTA (New York's Metropolitan Transportation Authotity) and was REFUSED. She went to court to force them to run it and won. Now that HAVE to run it. What disturbs me is why, in America, she NEEDED to go to court to force them to run this ad, since it is well known that Islamic terrorists (of which HAMAS is just one organization) has “declared war” on ALL people who are not Muslims, or “approved” Muslims. Are there really such STUPID people running the MTA? Elsewhere, flying the American Flag is prohibited in many places, while flying the ISIS flag is NOT. And in some places people are FORCED to allow it. (American Freedom Law Center)

Christian Persecution

The rampant persecution of Christians is on the rise in the Middle East, capped by the recent atrocity of 30 (or so) Christians wearing the signature orange “suits” being simultaneously beheaded and shot by Islamic terrorists. Then there's the recent atrocity where they came into a school (Or was it a shopping center? I lose track, they do it in so many places), asking people individually if they are Christian or Muslim, letting the Muslims go and killing the Christians. In Mosul, Iraq, there are no Christians left. They've all been murdered or have fled, or converted on threat of death. Yet nothing major has been done about it. We ought to mount an overwhelming force, go where the Islamic terrorists are, and kill THEM in the same manners they use to kill Christians. Just round them up and behead them. Apparently this is all they understand. The current method, sending in an EQUAL force with impossible "rules of combat", isn't working. We need to start using their tactics on them. Wouldn't that make us just as bad, you ask? NO, it wouldn't. We would just be killing the killers, not the innocents. These people have forfeited their right to be alive on this Earth by their actions. So we need to kill them where they're caught (in the act), not “capture” and “prosecute” them. That only leaves openings for further atrocities, and these people have PROVEN their willingness to commit them. (Just common sense)

Wisconsin's "Legal" Rape

In America, has it ever happened that the cops used a “battering ram” to break into a private homes, stole thousands of dollars in private property (those people will never see again) including their daughter's computer, without ANY charges resulting, and then threatening that citizen with dire results if he told ANYBODY about what had happened, much less tried to sue to get the return of his property? Yes; it HAS happened—in Wisconsin, recently, all the handiwork of ONE crooked prosecutor who went after several Republican voters who helped Gov. Scott Walker beat back his political foes. This was an effort to destroy Walker politically, and it was done by LAW ENFORCEMENT! Prompted by a corrupt Democrat politician, Milwaukee County District Attorney, John Chisholm, aided by a just as corrupt judge.

They did this under the “John Doe Laws,” which allow the cops to “investigate” ANYONE, without even a REAL suspicion of wrongdoing. And NONE of the people they raided because they helped Walker in one way or another were guilty of ANYTHING. This whole thing reminds us of 1930s Germany and the “out-of-control” SS troops; “hob-nailed boot” boys. The victims said, “I thought it was a home invasion!” It was. It was just performed by corrupt cops, under orders from corrupt politicians. They were told, “Don't call your lawyer. Don't tell your friends. Not even your mother or your neighbors. Don't try to sue us.” That should have itself been a tipoff as to the illegality of the whole operation. The corrupt judge in this case was Barbara Klucka (no relation to “Kukla, Fran, and Ollie”) Please read everything linked here, including the original report in the National Review so you will know everything.

Apparently, there's a “police state” in Wisconsin, not run by the Republican governor, but by the corrupt judiciary, prosecution, and police. How this could happen in America is in question. But under Obama, who gets away with EVERYTHING, it can be done, knowing they can do what they want, as long as nobody does anything about their lawlessness, as it seems to be with Obama. You might ask why you haven't heard about this before. Why it is Rush Limbaugh and the National Review the source. The answer is simple. The liberal media just isn't interested because the “bad guys” are Democrats. (Rush Limbaugh)

"What's the Beef?"

Oh. Forgot. There's no beef involved. It's anything that comes from a PIG. Bacon, ham, pork or pork products, etc. Oxford Press has made an incredibly STUPID decision to no longer allow ANY mention of pigs or pig products in their books from now on, to “avoid offending Muslims.” How incredibly STUPID is this? Maybe CHRISTIANS should stop buying their books, as well as stop writing for this publisher. Why is it more important in a Christian world, to offend Christians to keep MUSLIMS from “getting their knickers in a knot?” It amazes me how incredibly STUPID some Americans can be. A bunch of fifth century fools go around KILLING innocent people all over the world, rampaging against mostly UNARMED people and brutally murdering them, CLAIMING to be doing it “for their faith.” But any “Religion” that says it's okay to KILL those who don't believe in it is no religion, at all, it's just a bunch of murderous thugs PRETENDING to be a religion. And their wishes should NOT be considered, about ANYTHING. I've noticed a certain pizza maker that is advertising a pizza made almost entirely of BACON, with THREE FEET of bacon wrapped around it. Good for them! They don't say they're doing this to “tick off” the Muslims, but I'd bet it does, anyway—and more power to them! (Survival Joe)

Moving the Goal Posts

The mayor of Houston, TX, who is gay, is screwing the people of Houston by illegally SUBPOENAING copies of the sermons of pastors who have preached against homosexuality. This is a patent VIOLATION of the Constitution's GUARANTEE of freedom of speech without harassment by the government, at any level. Rush Limbaugh said, “I think what that mayor in Houston has done may be one of the most vile, filthy, blatant violations of the Constitution that I have seen. And I, for the life of me, cannot figure out why law authorities are not pursuing this. I cannot understand it.” And he's right. Not only in the original action by the mayor, but in subsequent actions, as well. The pastors got more than enough signatures to put it on the ballot originally, and a “city official” stopped counting because she said the minimum number had been reached. Then the city attorney stepped in and invalidated a large number of signatures without going back to count those originally made. Then they kept changing the number of signatures required—12 times or more. This is still going on. And I think it's grounds for a RECALL of not only this mayor, but also of her henchmen who keep “moving the goalposts” to support her ILLEGAL actions. (World Net Daily)

Christian Holocaust

No, nobody's putting them in “ovens” and gassing them. They're just murdering them all over the map for NOT being the right kind of Muslims. " 'Christians are literally being beheaded and crucified, children being raped and killed every single day. Why is the response so mute?' - Glenn Beck' ” Why, indeed? If the world leaders had guts, they'd put together an UNBEATABLE combination and go out and KILL as many of those murderous Muslims as possible. It's the only thing they understand: death. Their own, or that of other people. The good thing about THEIR deaths is that those killed will kill no more. When the Indians in America killed a lot fewer people in their efforts to remain in possession of the land our government wanted, we “wiped them out” with superior numbers. Why do we keep on with the insipid, weak efforts we're using now? Efforts that GUARANTEE the success of the Islamic terrorists? I think it's because our president is WITH them. But nobody will believe me. (Just common sense)

Criminal Charges for Truth

What IS it with some Americans? Don't they know the Islamic terrorists are at WAR with us and are wantonly MURDERING us? Even if our president is either too stupid to know it, or is “in league” with them? Laura Loomer, a student at Barry University, exposed the school's SUPPORT for ISIS, and was threatened with “criminal charges” being filed against her. This in a country that SUPPOSEDLY has freedom of speech GUARANTEED in our Constitution. The guy who filed the charges used a “stretched out version” of the “two person requirement” in Florida that requires the permission of both parties to a recorded conversation be obtained before publishing a video of a person, which is a “twisted version” of this law. But the point is, people at this school SUPPORT ISIS. This frightens me, and should frighten ANYBODY who is smart enough to know ISIS is POISON! There is too much of this ignorance going around. (Last Resistance)

Using toilet Paper

Why ANYBODY would subscribe to a “religion” that so completely controls what you do that it pretends to be able to tell you what you can use to “wipe your butt” after you defecate or tells women how they can pee in the street without showing anything is beyond anything I've ever seen. Maybe that's why they insist you “convert” to their phony “religion” or be killed? Being under a sentence of death is the only reason I would ever even CONSIDER “converting” to this CULT “religion.” But only for as long as it takes me to kill the one who is threatening me. Before they were given “permission” to use toilet paper, what did they use? Their bare fingers? A recent “fatwa” also gives them permission to EAT THEIR WIVES if food is scarce. What about the rights of their wives to not only stay alive, but not be eaten? They obviously have NO REGARD for the rights of their women. Naturally, they will call this lies and propaganda. That's what they always call it when somebody tells the TRUTH about their fool practices. (Liberty Alliance)

Sounds Like Hillary

The FBI is telling the Inspector General that IT (the FBI) can “inspect the evidence” and “decide for itself” what to release to them in the “investigation” into the “Fast and Furious” Obama gun-running scheme, as well as other scandals. That sounds a lot like Hillary Clinton's “releasing” those e-mails SHE determines are not of “a personal nature” while she actively DESTROYS the rest so NOBODY (other than her) can look at them and decide whether or not she's lying. The FBI is SUPPOSED to be “cooperating” in those “investigations,” but that doesn't sound much like “cooperation.” it sounds like active OBSTRUCTION, to me. This is how the Obama administration works. That's what allows him to say “there are no real scandals in my administration.”.He's hoping to delay and delay until he's no longer in office (If he's ever not in office), hoping those then in charge will say, “He's gone, so why pursue it?” (Washington Times)

Hillary's Stupid Goals

Hillary says she's going to “topple the rich.” What the hell does THAT mean? And what would happen if she succeeded? Democrats are always talking about such things, never considering the EFFECT of what they promise. Why the hell would ANYBODY want to “topple the rich? SOMEBODY has GOT to be rich in order for society to survive. The “rich” are the people who MAKE society WORK by coming up with all the original ideas and making them work. The money THEY spend hiring people to do the things that MAKE them rich creates the JOBS that are NEEDED in order for society to survive. In a communist (socialist) country, only the government officials are rich. Or live like the rich on stolen money. And nobody seems to notice.What does “toppling the rich” entail? Nobody knows, much less Hillary, who is “rich as Croeses” herself, with “ill-gotten gains” she got by screwing the public, getting million dollar advances for books nobody wants to read and don't buy, and accepting bribes from foreign countries. She gives speeches, the content of which is completely unimportant and charges $300,000.00 to spout blather before fool people willing to pay that much to hear nonsense. I'd like for her to tell me just what “toppling the rich” even MEANS! She can't, because there IS no meaning to what she's promising, but nobody questions her about it. The kind of people she wants to vote for her are too IGNORANT. (Just common sense)

Why We Need to Be Armed!

The situation in the Ukraine is definite proof that all Americans need to be armed, so as to be able to defend ourselves—against the cops—or the army—or Obama’s private army if things get out of control here, as they have there. The Ukranian dictator has decided (in his “wisdom”) that all the demonstrators are “anti-government terrorists,” and has ordered the troops to use their guns to put a stop to the demonstrations. Meanwhile demonstrators are armed with nothing more than stones and “Molotov cocktails.” A little uneven force, there. While we’re at ir, I should remind you that Obama has ALREADY called conservatives and ANYBODY who disagreed with him TERRORISTS. Sounds to me like he’s “laying the groundwork” for a similar action against AMERICAN demonstrators against his dictatorial acts. Which makes it all the more important for the people to be armed, or be completely defenseless when opposed by Obama’s “private army.” (Bearing Arms)

Typical Illogical Liberal Thinking

Liberals, who deny the very EXISTENCE of logic (“logically”), are not know for their logical thinking. They're showing it again when they say the only new jobs the “fracking boom” are responsible for are those for prostitutes and maids. I guess what they're trying to say in their feeble way is that only top executives are making money from fracking, which, as usual, is STUPIDLY wrong. Without the hundreds, even thousands of WORKERS pulling the oil out of the ground, there would NOT be a “fracking boom.” They recognize this, but refuse to admit that ANYBODY but the “top brass” are making anything out of fracking when they say prostitutes and maids are the only ones making any money. Prostitutes from the increase in WORKERS making a lot of money, and the maids because the “top brass” needs more of them. That completely IGNORES the fact that there is a LOT of money floating around in areas where there is a “fracking boom.” For EVERYBODY, not just the “top brass.” The workers, and all the support industries, like groceries, filling stations, clothing stores, tool makers, and more. And, something they deny, single women, as well, make a LOT more money. All the oil drilling jobs are not for men, you know. The “rising tide raises all boats” is something (among many things) liberals just don't understand. (Washington Times)

"Sauce for the Goose"

Gays INSIST that Christian-owned bakeries bake cakes for their gay “weddings.” But it seems it doesn't work the other way around. Go into a gay-run bakery and ask for a wedding cake for a Christian wedding and you might get into trouble. In this case a pastor tried to get a “biblical-based passage” put on a cake and the gay owner of the bakery called the COPS, charging the pastor with wanting an “expression of hate” put on his cake. I guess hate is what you want it to be for some people. Seems like those bakeries run by people who APPROVE of homosexuality are held to a slightly different standard than those who don't. I always thought they called that a “double standard.” The Civil Rights Commission ruled that THREE bakeries in Colorado who refused to make a cake with the words, “God hates sin—Psalm 45:7” and “Homosexuality is a detestable sin—Leviticus 18:22” did not have to do so, and their refusal was NOT discriminatory. Funny: Why is it that not baking a cake with a GAY message on it IS discriminatory, but this one is NOT? Sounds like the “deck is well and truly STACKED in favor of the gay drive to FORCE their wishes on Christians. Now, I have nothing against gays, or what they do to each other in private, but I DO have something against the crappy things they are doing to OTHERS today. Somebody's trying to make an illegitimate point. (World Net Daily)

This Is Why We'll Lose

We're destined to lose to the Islamic fools who want to kill ALL people they can't con into “converting” to their phony religion. Not because they're such fierce opponents (they're mostly cowards), but because we are beating ourselves. This story is an example of how we're doing it. A Texas teacher told the TRUTH about Islam, and was PUNISHED for it. Without even looking, I know the excuse they give is to “keep from offending Muslims.” That this is STUPID, I have said, many times. And I expect I will get a visit soon from men in black suits and “Aviator-style” sunglasses to take me to task for it. When we “bow down” to our ENEMIES, we will soon LOSE to them and usually without a shot being fired. Unfortunately, in this case, since Islamic terrorists LOVE to kill, there WILL be shots fired, even though our fool “leaders” will be cooperating in our demise. (Freedom Outpost)

CEOs Paid Too Much?

Hillary thinks America's CEOs are getting paid too much because they earn so much more than their employees. What this fool doesn't understand about economics and business would fill a large book. She doesn't understand that CEOs bring in more money by far than do most of their employees (who are there only to IMPLEMENT the ideas and originality of the “top brass”). Hillary, meanwhile, WITHOUT such originality of thinking, NOR genius, earns more than THEY do. But she doesn't think there's anything wrong with that. ALL liberals, for the most part, earn a LOT more than the average American, mostly by haranguing those who CREATE all the wealth and CLAIMING they “don't pay their share,” when the government's own figures (those Obama can't control, that is) say millionaires and billionaires pay MOST of the income taxes paid. But liberals not only ignore that, they tell you it's not true. It is liberals, you'll remember, who DENY the very EXISTENCE of LOGIC! (Washington Examiner)

More Evidence For More Shooters

What would you do if a criminal were beating the hell out of your daughter and 911 puts you on hold? Just let him continue? Not this man; he shot and killed the criminal. It was a glitch in the system, but that made no difference to this man, who was not willing to wait for 911 to send somebody. His call first went to the Fire Dept., and while being transferred to the police dept., it went to voice mail. So he shot one of the intruders. The others are probably still running. And that’s as it should be. People ought to have the means of routing criminals who break into their homes to assault and rob them, even if the cops NEVER get there. But that’s not how anti-gun fools want it. They say the cops can protect you, but they’re WRONG. And they’ll never admit it. This is more evidence of it. (Fox 8)

Likely Fired for Defending Himself

And for stopping the robbery of the store in which he worked. Yes, he DID “break their rules” by bringing his gun into the store and, (heaven forbid) using it when a criminal tried to rob the store. But what did they expect him to do? Let the guy rob them, and maybe kill HIM? This is a personal defense issue. Such “rules” are WRONG. This guy didn’t MISUSE his gun; he used it in the proper manner to defend himself AND the store. He didn’t shoot at, nor threaten an innocent person at any time. He didn’t “make it plain” that he was “carrying.” But the bureaucrats in the store management FIRED him, as stupid bureaucrats will do, in their ignorance. I just hope the media attention will help him get another job, this time with somebody who has some intelligence. This guy has a good attitude. “I’d rather be armed and not need it that not be armed and be victimized. I can always get another job” (Hopefully, in Obama’s world). (Bearing Arms)

More Liberal Incompetence

I keep talking about liberal incompetence. Everybody like me keeps telling liberals that arbitrarily raising minimum wages to such levels business can no longer afford to pay their employees more than they're worth and must raise their own prices sky high or go out of business. They never listen to us. They go right on and make the stupid laws they make, out of IGNORANCE about the facts of business, ignoring the possible consequences to their constituents. When their constituents suffer, they also ignore that and go right on with their stupid ideas and make some more stupid laws.

It really astounds me how liberals can actually SEE the “unintended consequences” of their stupid, short-sighted laws and say, “That didn't cause that,” knowing it DID. It's happening now in Seattle, WA, where they actually PASSED the ordinance forcing businesses to pay a minimum wage of $15.00 an hour for jobs whose wages should not be even as much as HALF that because those holding them have NO TALENTS or abilities and have to be taught even how to flip a burger or must have a cash register that will tell them how much change to give the customer because they have no idea how to count change out of a cash drawer. Now FOUR major restaurants that have been “mainstays” for many years in Seattle have closed, rather than pay that much to people who aren't worth HALF that much.

And there will be more to come, not only in the restaurant industry. They think their stupid laws don't cost young people their jobs? They look at the jobs their laws HAVE cost them and deny they did. They're totally BLIND to the consequences of their actions. That's total incompetence. I could go on and on about their stupid basic reasoning in other areas, such as their thinking that making a LAW against guns will keep CRIMINALS (who obey NO laws) from having them or that the way to self-defense is to DISARM yourself—as in guns, AND in nuclear power. Yet we (not me) keep electing these fools to office in spite of their incompetence. Why we do that is incomprehensible to me. (Western Journalism)

"Clinton Could Announce!"

As soon as this weekend! (Written on 4/10) Hooray! (pant, pant!) Oh, joy! The world awaits with “baited breath,” Hillary's “announcement” of what we've known for years! She's “running for president!” Again! They promised her it would be “her turn” this time in return for “moving out of the way” so that unknown entity, Barack Obama, could con his way into the White House. They “rewarded” her before with a stint as Secretary of State, a job at which she failed miserably, but which allowed her to enrich herself even more. No other Democrat of consequence has shown an interest in announcing (yet), to stay out of her way (Correction: three unknowns have expressed an interest, I guess so nobody could SAY it's a "set up") so it looks like we're going to be “saddled” with her as the Democrat nominee (unless another Obama crawls out of the woodwork). But we don't care. She has failed at everything she has ever tried and gotten people KILLED through her incompetence. If she ever gets elected, she will be but a “figurehead,” and those who run things from “behind the scenes” will continue to make the important decisions, as usual. By the way, liberals are telling us not to call Hillary by her first name, since that's “sexist.” Who cares what liberals say, anyway? I use words I choose, and which I think are appropriate. PC Police be damned! (Just common sense)

"No Restrictions on Abortion?"

That's what our erstwhile Democrat Party Chair says, as she shakes her shaggy, messy mane and lets bugs fly in every direction. It plainly amazes me how MURDER can gain such a strong position that top government officials not only condone it, they think it should be allowed without ANY kind of restrictions. Using birth control merely stops a birth from happening. Abortion stops a beating heart and kills a human being. That is a CRIME! And this b-tch is culpable in every baby murder that has happened since she was named to that office. They called the soldiers who were sent to Vietnam “baby killers” falsely. But this woman, and ALL persons who believe in abortion ARE “baby killers.” They MURDER defenseless infants before they can even be BORN! She thinks cases of rape and incest, as well as the life of the mother should be good reason for “exceptions” to any law banning baby murder. But that child should NOT be punished for the sins of one of his/her parents. The child can always be put up for adoption. That does not murder him/her. The life of the mother? Yes. But that's the ONLY proper exception. Never the “convenience” of the parent. Pro-abortion people talk about “the right of women to decide what happens to her own body." But prostitution remains illegal in most places. That's a CLEAR double standard. (Daily Caller)

"Shall Make NO LAW"

In The Constitution It Says, “Congress shall make NO LAW respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.”  NO LAW! What part of “NO LAW” do you not understand, atheists? I really get tired of certain atheists objecting to ANY visual or verbal or written expression if our religious rights. It must really disytress them to see all the depictions of God's "Ten Commandments" on the edifice of the Supreme Court. I'm not real big on organized religion, but what today's atheists do IS “making a law” regarding the establishment of a religion, or NOT. The laws they seek to make PROHIBIT the free exercise of religion anywhere NEAR a government institution, at any time. No matter how tenuous that connection may be. The law did NOT say “there shall be no reference to religion ANYWHERE, in ANY WAY in ANY government establishment. It said government cannot ESTABLISH a religion, nor PROHIBIT it's free exercise. Therefore, atheism, BEING a religion itself, should not be seen in religion, according to their own beliefs. No law means no law. Not A law to keep religion OUT of government. It says, “no law,” not 'no religion.” It was put there so Americans could practice ANY religion they wished, free of government edict or interference. Not to keep the government from itself PRACTICING a religion. No more. It is NOT there to keep atheists from being “offended.” At least,. That's what they want us to think. (Wikipedia)

A Good Illustration

If you want to see what a government-run medical system will look like, just take a look at the VA scandal where, even if the “scandal” about the long waiting periods and covering them up is being “dealt with,” the lines to be SEEN are STILL way too long. They say they're “striving” to reduce the waiting period to 30 days, which, in itself, is way too long. And just recently, a vet DIED in a VA hospital from the wrong medicine being prescribed. This is the kind of incompetent medical care we can expect once the government has COMPLETE control over it. Just recently, my provider for “Part D” of Medicare notified me they would no longer pay for TWO of my important medications—which I NEED to stay alive—because it's “not on a list” of medications they pay for. Never mind I NEED the medication to stay alive. And they FORCED me to accept this “Part D” crap,and wanted to FINE me for not “signing up” as soon as the law was passed. I told them to “stick it.” (Just common sense)

Basic Gun Fallacy

The whole idea that a LAW will stop CRIMINALS from buying or stealing guns to use on all of us. The idea that the way to self-defense is to DISARM ourselves. Or that having a list of gun owners will do ANYTHING to reduce ”gun violence.” All that will do is give the government the names and addresses of honest people (not the criminals, who don't register their guns) who own guns and OBEY the law, so they can go there and “confiscate” (steal) them when they can figure out a good excuse, individually or severally. NONE of the laws and regulations today's (and yesterday's) anti-gun fools get passed do that. All they do is give criminals and crazies a steady stream of UNARMED VICTIMS. The “anti-gun fools” don't care about “gun violence,” although they SAY they do. They just want to DISARM every American who OBEYS laws. And they're well on their way to doing that. (Just common sense)

"Kill "Em All!"

In the most painful way there is. And make them KNOW ahead of time that's what we're going to do, so they'll think twice before they wantonly MURDER Christians and Jews for BEING Christians and Jews. What the hell makes THEM the arbiters of the “right faith” to have? We need to stop listening to the pantywaist politicians who piss and moan about the “rights” of the Islamic terrorists we capture? Don't “hold” them, KILL them when they're caught in the act. And kill them in such a way that they suffer a slow, PAINFUL death. That's all they deserve. William W, Johnstone, in one of his many excellent books, just before his character put a bullet between a thug's eyes, said, “Some people just don't have the right to live.” And he's right. These people have, by their very actions in murdering and maiming, raping and beheading people, adults and CHILDREN, sometimes right in FRONT of their children before raping and beheading THEM, too, have, in my opinion, spurned every right they MAY have once had to stay alive a minute longer than it takes to hunt them down and KILL them in the most painful way possible. (Just common sense)

BS Everywhere!

It's not hard to see how politicians (and others) convince people who “pay no attention to politics” of their stupidities. They have ads running everywhere, and most people don't even consciously notice them. But their subconscious does. Like the ad I just saw saying, “This is America's Energy Moment.” Whatever the hell THAT means! But it doe a lot to support the phony “energy” scam that's being ruin on us by Obama and his henchmen. I see ads all over pushing things like “Save the Polar Bears!” (who don't need saving—they're thriving). And more telling us that MAN is responsible for “global warming” (whatever Gore is calling his swindle now). It amazes me that they can get so many FOOLS to believe that BS, when it's a known fact (ignored by the global warming promoters) that the “globe” has NOT been warming for at least the last FIFTEEN years—most of the time in which Gore's swindle has been increasing. Even if it were true, what's bad about ONE DEGREE increase in temperature in a hundred years? “Climate change” is CYCLICAL. The “globe” warms, then it COOLS, Then it warms again. And Gore (and many more people) have made a LOT of money from it. (Just common sense)

Reid: 12 Different Versions

Seems like every time Sen, Harry Reid (D-NV) tells the story of how he hurt his eye, it changes. First, it happened when he was alone in his bathroom. Now it happened in an “unspecified room,” with his wife “standing right there.” Next, we hear a story about his brother, who “got drunk and had a fight with a family member (unnamed, of course)." Rush Limbaugh thinks he was beaten up by the mob, when he failed to deliver something he promised them. I don't know why his story changes so much, every time he tells it, but a continually changing story is the sign of a LIAR. And we know Harry is an unrepentant liar, anyway, after his LIE that Romney had not paid taxes for ten years—which he now ADMITS, and is in no way sorry for, since Romney lost. And this is the sleaze level of top “leaders” in our government. This kind of sleaze starts at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue (the White House) and ends up in your local dog catcher's office. If it's okay with the PRESIDENT to lie (and Obama is the chief LIAR in our government), it seems like it's okay for ALL politicians (except Republicans, of course). (Just common sense)

Be Alert...Very Alert!

Some would say, “be afraid...very afraid,” but I won't. The only reason to be afraid though, is Obama's penchant for helping Islamic terrorists any way he can, wherever he can. They found this encampment (Obama still denies it), but apparently did nothing about it except talk. At least, not according to this article, which says nothing about anything actually being done, except for “watching them.” Who thinks it will be a long time before they start committing the same kind of atrocities here as they do in the Middle East, once they (with Obama's help) get settled and situated, with enough money behind them IN the United States? Will we wait until they start beheading CHILDREN here? Obama is a distinct danger to us. There isn't much time left to impeach him, but we should do it, anyway, before he allows the Islamic terrorists to gain a foothold here while he makes laws and “regulations” to help socialists also to gain a foothold. (Corruption Chronicles)

One Reason Only

There's only ONE REASON why Iran is willing to engage in the “dog and pony show” these “talks”about stopping them from getting a nuclear capacity are. That is to make them safe from attack by countries in the area who are concerned about what they would DO with a nuclear capability (at least for the next ten years), considering their penchant for screaming, “death to Israel,” and their determination to “push Israel into the sea” sentiments which they have never hesitated to shout to the skies. Liberals say we have no right to stop them getting a nuclear bomb, and except for them being run by lunatics we could not TRUST to have such a cabaility without using it on innocents to further their “fevered desires,” they would be right. The world accepted Russia having a nuclear capability because they knew that “mutual assured destruction” would stop them from using it, Russia may be run by CRIMINALS, but they're not INSANE criminals, as is Iran. (Just common sense)

What Is A Traitor?

Anyone who releases information you don't like released, as Edward Snowdon did. Now he's being hounded all over the world and is forced to seek “asylum” in Russia, fergawdsakes! At one point he had to LIVE in an airport because it was “neutral territory.” But Valerie Jerrett, who leaked the information about Hillary's “private” e-mail system, is a “heroine,” and continues to hold her trusted position on the White House staff. I would call this hypocritical, and it is, but hypocritical acts are EXPECTED among liberals—and liberals are the ones now RUNNING this administration. The term “hypocrite” has been used so much (properly) that is become useless to describe anything. Last I heard, there's a LAW against punishing “whistle-blowers.” But don't worry—Obama just calls it something different to “get around” the law. (Tea Party Bulletin)

Suspicions Confirmed

I've always thought those ubiquitous TSA screeners were more interested in “feeling up” people than they were in finding anything on them that would allow them to take over an airplane and fly it into a building, as in New York City in 2001. Now my suspicions have been confirmed by the ADMISSION of one screener that she (SHE!) “set things up” so a MALE screener could feel certain MEN up during the PRETENSE of a “more diligent search.” She says she “created an anomaly” by setting her computer on “female” to make it “beep” during the “usual” feeling up so the other screener could have an excuse to actually run his hands (palms forward) over the genitals of the man for his own sexual gratification. The only thing that surprised me is that it was a WOMAN setting things up so a MAN could feel up a MAN, Those screeners have been forever discredited, and will have a much harder time making people think all they're doing is trying to “protect” passengers. Just as that co-pilot did for co-pilots, everywhere by locking the cockpit door and flying his plane into a mountain. (CBS Denver)

More "Dirty Tricks"

There doesn't seem to be a law against banks discriminating against gun shops and manufacturers, so Obama is using the banks to “put the pressure” on them by closing their bank accounts. I guess discrimination practiced by the PRESIDENT is allowed, even if other forms of discrimination are not. Obama can't just BAN guns, so he's doing everything he can to make it hard, not only on gun owners, but on gun makers and sellers. Somebody needs to slap this fool down. If gun makers can't make guns, where will the cops and “federal agents” get theirs? Does he really think this will make guns disappear from the Earth? If he does, he needs to take his “rose-colored glasses” off. It ain't agonna happen. He's only forcing law-abiding citizens to become criminals in order to defend themselves against criminals, who have no problem getting their guns ILLEGALLY. And if they can't be made or sold in the U. S., they'll be imported, and make billions of dollars for illegal gun dealers, whose numbers will increase markedly as fewer guns are made and sold legally here. He will have CREATED an illegal market, as they did for illegal booze when they passed prohibition, which is the reason that “:organized crime” (not the government) became very strong. (Daily Caller)

The "Muslim Mafia"

They don't like what we say about them because it's truth—and they don't want the truth out there. Truth about the activities of Islamic terrorists, yes. But also about “mercy killings,” forcing their women to go about wearing what amounts to a mobile “tent,” Not allowing women to get a divorce unless the man agrees, at the same time allowing a MAN to get a divorce by just parading up and down the street shouting, “I divorce thee!” Then there is the “temporary marriage” that allows a Muslim MAN to engage in a “temporary marriage” for one night only, getting a divorce the way I just described the next morning. This allows a Muslim to use a prostitute without violating his “faith.” Then there are the “rape laws” where a woman who was raped needs FOUR male witnesses to the rape to prove it, and can be punished herself for “sex outside of marriage.”

The whole Muslim “religion” seems to be simply an accommodation for what MEN want to do and to HELL with women. They're just “property.” It's also there to make LEGAL the abuse of small CHILDREN, with the “marriage laws” allowing “marriage” to girls as young as age 6, and allowing a child to be FORCED into such a “marriage” against their will—and they call US “corrupt.” So the “Council on American-Islamic Relations (a DECLARED terrorist support organization that is a HAMAS front group) is SUING a father-son reporter combination for writing and publishing an article they consider “slander.” Never mind that what they consider slander is what we call TRUTH. They figure even if they cannot win such a suit, they can cost these men enough money to “break them” financially and thus discourage them from writing such articles. (World Net Daily)

Battle of the Dynasties

It seems to me we're constantly suffering under the thumb of one dynasty or another. It was FDR for many terms; then they altered the Constitution to keep that from happening again. Then it was the Clintons—and lastly (for now) the Bushes and Obama. Obama is a “dynasty” all by himself. He has single-handedly done more damage to the United States than ANY president in the past. But I digress; now we're faced with the possibility of an election that represents TWO different “dynasties:--the Bushes and the Clintons. We have had the maximum TWO terms for each, and are now faced with the specter of a THIRD term for either the Clintons or the Bushes, Hillary seems to be the one the DEMOCRATS want to foist upon us, whether we want her or not, with Jeb Bush being said to be the “anointed one” on the Republican side. If there's one thing we don't need, it's another DYNASTY president—on either side. There are too many other good candidates “in the wings” that the Democrats have already falsely discredited, such as Sarah Palin, whom even REPUBLICANS believe (falsely) can't be elected, which is really STUPID. She can not only GET elected, but will get rid of a lot of the “chaff” and “deadwood” among the GOP, which is what frightens them. (New York Times)

Managerial Incompetence

It is a lot more widespread than most people imagine. It becomes more obvious when an airline pilot succumbs to his depression and flies his airplane into a mountain, killing himself and all aboard. His company KNEW of his depression and did not stop him from flying. They certified him okay to fly, therefore condemning hundreds of people to a horrible death. It's obvious in the federal government every time Obama makes a decision. For instance, his REFUSAL to call Islamic terrorism what it IS, therefore condemning thousands of non-Muslims to death—and even some MUSLIMS. It's obvious when he tells his troops to “cut and run” and leave their guns and equipment, therefore ARMING the enemy while maintaining “plausible deniability.” It's obvious in cities like Detroit where they spent and spent until they had no more to spend—and , unlike the feds, they can't PRINT money while other liberals have yet to come to their aid with YOUR money. Obama has done so many stupid things I can't even keep up with them, let alone list them here. Places like Target Stores, who declare their stores “gun-free zones,” clearly INVITING armed criminals to come there and shoot them up, since there will be no guns there to oppose them. Anti-gun fools who still believe the way to defend yourself is to DISARM yourself. That is incompetence personified. (Just common sense)

Of Course Not!

Did anybody really think Obama's government was going to press charges against Lois Lerner for “targeting” conservative organizations while “fast-tracking” liberal ones? For the very ACT of "punishing" conservatives with the IRS?  “Ronald Machen, the former U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia, told House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) in a seven-page letter this week, that he would not bring a criminal case to a grand jury over Lerner’s refusal to testify before the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee in March 2014. The House approved a criminal contempt resolution against Lerner in May 2014, and Machen’s office has been reviewing the issue "EVER since." And it took him until NOW to decide what we all (who pay attention) KNEW was going to be his “decision.” Nobody who commits a criminal act in SUPPORT of Obama's wishes ever gets prosecuted. Obama will not let that happen. If he did, they'd stop committing crimes for his benefit. (Politico)

"Double Standard"

The media is giving Rand Paul a hard time for his “anger issues” after he calmly and politely “took Savannah Guthrie to task” for talking over him, and not giving him a chance to answer her questions, but “gave Hillary a pass” on all HER occasions of “losing her temper” in public, and private (including throwing a book at her philandering husband, which even the then press officer admitted). One of the most well-known is her tirade on HER right to disagree with the administration in charge (then Gorge Bush's administration) and her famous “What DIFFERENCE does it make?” crack before the Congress, regarding Benghazi (showing her complete indifference to the deaths SHE caused). Liberals always make a lot of noise about Republicans when they rightly complain about their treatment by the liberal media, but give Democrats who also complain a “pass.” This is one of the more obvious cases of media bias there is, and they can't deny it and have intelligent people agree. (News Busters)

It's So Easy

When I embarked on this “mission” to tell Americans what their politicians and bureaucrats (Democrats AND Republicans) don't want them to know, I was wondering how I could keep enough material coming in to keep it going. I subscribed to many sources that promised to keep me informed of the peccadilloes and lies of our politicians and subsequently got a HUNDRED or more items ahead so that some of them, by the time they were published, were somewhat old. I needn't have worried. Today, I can barely get out of my e-mail without having more than enough material about the ignorant activities of our politicians. Day after day, these INCOMPETENT politicians and bureaucrats give me enough material to fill many more blogs than I can publish without my having to even LOOK for more. I have THREE main blogs, based on different angles of the same thing:

There's The Bull Cutter, which covers GENERAL silliness and lies committed. Then there's The Unarmed Citizen, which keeps people up to date on the ongoing systemic efforts to DISARM all Americans (not necessarily instances of armed citizens using their guns in self defense, since there are many other blogs to do that), and “Ray's Shorts,” one containing SHORT opinion comments not necessarily accompanied by the links to other sources, since this one is simply my OPINION. I leave the PROOF of their ignorance to my other blogs and news sources in this one. It's so easy to get information for these blogs, I only have trouble sitting here tapping on this keyboard long enough to get it down. (I AM 77, you know). Sometimes it hurts me just to lie in bed and SLEEP, let alone typing all day. But I'll keep doing this as long as I'm still able, bringing you TRUTH and OPINION from the point of view of a “rational individualist,” not that of a Democrat OR a Republican. (Just common sense)

Who Will Answer the Phone?

Hillary's famous ad for her 2008 election campaign about who you want to answer the phone in the middle of the night when there's an emergency will SINK her, according to Rand Paul, who sees her handling of the Benghazi Islamic terrorist attack, where four embassy employees, including an ambassador, were brutally murdered after she, as Secretary of State, for months previously REFUSED to increase their security in SPITE of continual threats to their safety. Add to that her complete mishandling of the situation itself, telling rescuers, who COULD have gotten there in time to save some lives, to “stand down.” Of course, she vehemently denies that, and Obama has THREATENED anybody who comes forward with information about that fiasco. The point is, she has shown herself INCAPABLE of handling such emergencies that she will be forced to handle if she ever became president. Thank God she'll probably LOSE the election, even if the “behind the scenes powers” manage to get her nominated in spite of all her “baggage.” Unless they manage to STEAL the election as they did TWICE for Obama. (The Blaze)

Yes, This Is New

At first glance when I saw this headline, I said to myself, “This is new?” Because I well knew that communist China purposely placed clinics close to prisons to make it easier to quickly “harvest” organs from executed prisoners. Seems that's “big business” in communist China since they execute so many people for even MINOR “crimes,” Sometimes just for disagreeing with politicians. But this IS the first I've heard of them “harvesting” organs from LIVING people, and especially without anesthesia. They reportedly kill about 10,000 political prisoners per year, which really should be enough. But greedy people always want more. Word is that personnel at Chinese “hospitals” take organs from LIVE patients, and throw the bodies in the incinerator before they're even dead. This is a good indication of what you can expect when a government is in TOTAL control, and the people HAVE no rights, whatsoever. They have, according to some testimony, included rape in their box of tricks, raping women before taking their organs (while still alive) WITHOUT anesthesia. (Last Resistance)

Connecticut Criminalizes 2nd Amendment

Conn. Citizens have REFUSED to “register” their “assault weapons” and have been declared felons all. I hope they have big prisons in the state where 1700 citizens USED their “assault weapons” of the day (muskets) to overthrow King George in “the Colonies.” They can’t just ban guns, so they “go around” the Constitution by forcing people to “register” them and putting them in prison if they don’t. Maybe we need another revolution. As of Dec. 31, only 15% of “assault weapon owners” have applied for “registration.”” So that makes about 300,000 people now felons. Good luck putting them all in prison, folks! What amazes me is the STUPIDITY of liberal politicians who still think you can make a LAW and “solve” the “gun violence” problem by “registering” LEGAL guns. Which ignores all the ILLEGAL guns out there, whose owners are already lawbreakers. When are these people going to “wise up?” Damn, what stupidity! (Investors.com)

Another Gun Maker Moves

Remington Arms, one of America’s biggest gun makers, has moved out of New York to Alabama, taking 2,000 jobs and a LOT of money with it. Another ammunition maker has moved out of Colorado for Wyoming, taking their 200 jobs with them. And these are not going to be the only ones to do so as liberal politicians make it impossible to survive in states where they cannot sell their products. Maybe politicians will get it soon. But I doubt it, they never have been able to “read the tea leaves.” And they HAVE no logic. (Truth About Guns)

What About the Constitution?

There is an increasing call to PUNISH “global warming deniers.” This, after global warming has been PROVED false in many ways. They can no longer ANSWER the criticism from knowledgeable people who UNDERSTAND their swindle, so they just want to shut us up! AlGore (the chief global warming swindler) was the first to suggest punishing “global warming deniers,” and now Adam Weinstein, of the Gawker (another global warming swindler) has joined the chorus. He says those “deniers” are LYING, and we have laws on the books to punish liars. But the lies are coming from HIS direction, so why aren't THEY being punished? We have a constitutional RIGHT to freedom of speech and, unless you can PROVE a person is lying, you have no case. We have PROVEN our case, so we don't need to make them shut up. But they do have a reason to shut us up, because they can't PROVE we're lying. These swindlers need to be arrested and imprisoned, not have the right to SHUT UP the people who tell the TRUTH about their swindle. (Lew Rockwell)

UN Wants Your Guns

No matter that we rejected the UN Gun Treaty, they still want your guns. They recently issued Resolution 2117, which mandates member nations collect citizens’ arms and destroy them. They don’t want any guns in the hands of citizens when they come in and take over. Look at Australia, Canada, and Great Britain to see that citizen disarmament just doesn’t work to reduce gun violence. But that’s only their “cover story.” They don’t care about that. They just want to reduce the number of civilian guns THEY will meet when they come for their enemies in any country. They are authorized to “act as peace keepers within the borders of conflict areas.” And who decides what ARE “conflict areas?" THEY do. Without input from the United States government. Which means they can come in, at their whim, with THEIR guns, and use them against us, and we will not have any legal guns with which to defend ourselves against their “blue helmets.” So I guess the only answer is going to be ILLEGAL guns which will still be in easy access. (Patriot Update)

Success In California

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, one of the most liberal, and most reversed courts in the nation, has ruled that California cannot ban guns because to do so is unconstitutional. But don’t look for “instant concealed carry.” There are still many local laws in force that must be dealt with specifically. And then there is the possibility that the “most reversed court in the land” will be again reversed. I’m surprised the justices there “came to their senses,” but I don’t have the same expectations for their higher court. (Human Events)

She Couldn't Find Bigotry

So she “ginned it up.” Alyssa Marino, who is an “infobabe” for a local TV station in the South Bend, Indiana area (ABC 57), was going door-to-door searching for someone to make her story that there was “bigotry abounding” in the area. She couldn't find any and was about ready to give up when she walked into “Memories Pizza” in Walkerton, IN and asked a young, naive girl who was working the counter if they would cater a gay wedding. Never mind there has never BEEN a wedding catered by a pizza joint, gay or otherwise. This young lady said they would not, for religious reasons. Never mind she is not the manager, that nobody has ever even ASKED them to do so, and she doesn't make policy for the store. But Alyssia had her “hook” on which to base her “ginned-up” story so she “ran with it.” George Soros' 10 people who have an algorythm to make their Tweets look like they come from thousands went into action and even made “death threats,” forcing the closing of the store. It was all “ginned up,” but that's how liberals work when they want to sensationalize a story. (News Busters)

"They're Domestic Terrorists!"

Bryan Miller, one of the top anti-gun fools, says, “only domestic terrorists want high-capacity magazines.” Really? How about people defending themselves AGAINST “domestic terrorists? You can’t defend yourself against a CRIMINAL with a high-capacity magazine unless you have one, too. This is the kind of ignorance preached by ALL anti-gun fools while they continue making their stupid laws that do nothing but DISARM honest people and leave the road free for CRIMINALS, who obey NO laws. We keep telling them and telling them that their laws are STUPID, but they keep “shining us on.” They’re “tone deaf” to reason. They know they can’t ban guns altogether, so they make laws to make them impossible to get into action fast enough, or with enough firepower to repulse an illegally-armed criminal. They’d make all guns single-shot (or NO shot) if they could. (Bearing Arms)

He Didn't Even Flinch

Hinds County, Mississippi Supervisor Kenneth Stokes was talking to reporters at a news conference in a school about curbing gun violence when a shot rang out behind him and he just kept talking. He didn’t even flinch, like he was used to it. As usual, that school had signs all over the place saying, “No Guns Allowed.” Maybe the guy who shot the gun behind him couldn’t read, as is true with so many in our schools, today. Or maybe he just didn’t care, which is more likely. Notice: This is Mississippi, in the “Deep South,” where black people should not have been elected to office according to liberals. And he is black. Good on him! (The Blaze)

"Rights" That Don't Exist

Gays in Springfield, MO, are “standing up” for “gay rights” vs. religious rights. There's one problem: religious rights are guaranteed by the Constitution. Gay “rights” being superior to theirs are NOT. But that makes no difference to the fools who are “jumping up and down” because that city stood up for religious rights. Springfield, the state's largest city, repealed a six-year-old ordinance that gave “special preference” to “gay rights” and the heads of gay residents exploded. “How DARE they go against us?” I'm sure that's what they thought. Like Obama being angry that CONGRESS would go against HIM, and just as foolish, they're “going bananas about it. This is NOT about their gayness. It's about WHOSE rights are superior to others. “Some animals are more equal than others,” in other words (not calling gays animals, but referring to “Animal Farm,” a prophetic book by George Orwell, although I'm sure they will claim it). Too many courts have ruled otherwise, and are making the Constitution meaningless. The whole point is, the gays are pushing “rights” that do not exist. I'm sure they will scream, “intolerance” to bully people into doing their bidding. (World Net Daily)

Killing Their Own Jobs

McDonald's workers in Denver and elsewhere are demonstrating in favor of raises to $15 per hour for what amounts to an “entry-level job” for people who aren't worth much money because they have NO SKILLS or abilities and must be TAUGHT to do the simplest things like how to make coffee or count change out of a cash drawer. Most of them can't even do that, and require a cash register that TELLS them how much change to give. If that register goes down, they must have a calculator sitting next to it to help them calculate how much change to give. They can't even figure THAT out in their minds. This “entry-level job” is NOT for people who have a family to support, and anybody who HAS a family that is still working there should go elsewhere to find work where they can earn higher wages (if they're WORTH it). Any adult trying to raise a family who still works for McDonald's is in the wrong place. Demanding that SILLY amount of money for so simple a job is STUPID, and will cause McDonald's, and anybody else FORCED to pay that much by the liberal FOOLS in Washington, will soon find it necessary to cut their work force, raise their prices, and/or go out of business. These people are NOT WORTH $15 an hour, and they'll soon find out they've destroyed their own jobs if they continue to demand it. The “Worker's World” (a communist newspaper) supports their action—of course. (Fox 31)

"Buying Guns "A Privilege?"

It amazes me how politicians can IGNORE the Constitution with impunity simply by making an untrue statement and pretending it's true. Oregon gun-grabbers are doing that with the law they're now making to OUTLAW all private gun sales except those between “close relatives” (who gets to decide HOW close?). The law also says that gun buying is a “PRIVILEGE,” not a right. This in spite of the very SIMPLE statement in the Constitution that it IS a RIGHT. Who the hell do they think they are? Naturally, the man sponsoring the bill is a DEMOCRAT. Background checks are part of his bill, even though background checks did NOTHING to stop numerous mass killings in the past and many of the killers PASSED background checks. The fact that what he is proposing is USELESS doesn't bother this FOOL. He wants to pass the bill into law, anyway. The law will “crush you” with a $250,000 fine for a second offense, doing what the Constitution says you CAN do. (Breitbart)

Christie's Right Decision

Shaneen Allen unthinkingly brought her gun (which she was legally allowed to carry in her state) into New Jersey, which TARGETS people from easy “concealed carry” states, HOPING they will do what she did, and forget their guns so they could arrest them. This single mother of two boys got a permit after previously being robbed and thought her permit would be recognized in New Jersey. She was wrong. New Jersey, where anti-gun FOOLS are plentiful, does NOT recognize it. So she spent 40 days in jail before she could come up with the money for bail. And she has been “under the gun” since 2013, figuring she might go to prison for years for an innocent oversight.. She couldn't even successfully look for work as long as this was held over her head. Which makes it hard to provide for her family. Christie may have done this because he wants to run for president, but whatever reason, he deserves credit for “righting a wrong.” (Julie on Politics)