Like when Harry Ried said his unnnamed (imaginary) friend told him
Mitt Romney didn't pay his taxes for ten years (since proven to be a
LIE), the Democrats are saying, “We don't NEED proof! You gotta
make Trump prove he DIDN'T sexually abuse those women!” I disagree.
They have to prove he DID! The phenomenon of many women “coming out
of the woodwork to “pile on” when a man is “accused” of
sexual misconduct MANY YEARS AGO, but which was not reported, the
evidence (if any) destroyed, happened to Bill Cosby. It happened to
Roger Ailes. Women who supposedly have been silent for many years
because they were “ashamed,” suddenly aren't “ashamed,” and
want only to get “revenge." Now it's happening to Donald Trump at a
very suspicious time, just WEEKS before the presidential election
where a known criminal wants to beat an honorable businessman to the
Oval Office.
Just look at ONE of his “accusers.” A People Magazine writer who did a piece on him years ago now claims he made “unwanted advances” on her DURING the interview for that piece, yet she STILL wrote a very complimentary “puff piece.” Donald LOVED. It seems to me that if he made UNWANTED advances, she wouldn't have written such a complimentary piece, at the very least. And, of course, in NONE of these “accusations” is there ANY PROOF. Any proof that might have existed has long been destroyed, by their own admission. I might be a little quicker to accept their “accusations” but for the TIMING, which is VERY suspicious. I suggest examining the backgrounds of these “aggrieved women” to see how many of them are Democrat campaign workers, or at least Democrats, who are well known for such underhanded tactics. (Just common sense)
Just look at ONE of his “accusers.” A People Magazine writer who did a piece on him years ago now claims he made “unwanted advances” on her DURING the interview for that piece, yet she STILL wrote a very complimentary “puff piece.” Donald LOVED. It seems to me that if he made UNWANTED advances, she wouldn't have written such a complimentary piece, at the very least. And, of course, in NONE of these “accusations” is there ANY PROOF. Any proof that might have existed has long been destroyed, by their own admission. I might be a little quicker to accept their “accusations” but for the TIMING, which is VERY suspicious. I suggest examining the backgrounds of these “aggrieved women” to see how many of them are Democrat campaign workers, or at least Democrats, who are well known for such underhanded tactics. (Just common sense)
No comments:
Post a Comment