Ashley Judd Is Insane!

She says that women in the Middle East have more rights than women in America! Where the hell she ever learned that is a complete mystery to me, and to every other intelligent human being. It is common knowledge that, in the Middle east, women are treated as CHATTEL. Owned by their fathers and later by their husbands. They are forced to wear a hijab or burka and ANY man may beat them on the street if they show only so much as a bare ankle. If they get raped (and they're more apt to get raped in a Muslim culture than anywhere else), they just shut up about it, because they're more likely to be charged with a crime (sex outside marriage) than the rapist. In order to prove rape, a woman has to have the testimony of FOUR MEN who witnessed the rape—something that would be impossible to get (if four Muslim men witnessed a rape, they'd probably join in). She cannot even go out of her domecile without being accompanied by a male member of her family. If she just stands too close to her boyfriend, she can be punished. And if she even LOOKS at the wrong guy, she can be KILLED by her own father or her brothers—and they will not be punished. I don't know what Ashley is smoking, but it must be some strong sh-t. This has to be one of the stupidest women on Earth! I say "one of" because I could name some others just as stupid. (Right Wing News)

"Domestic Terrorism"

Forget Islamic terrorism. We have plenty of “homegrown terrorism” right here to contend with. The liberal media calls it, “The Republican effort to criminalize demonstrations.” Never mind they write nasty things on buildings next to GOP headquarters, throw Molotov cocktails into others, and damage lots of private property, burn cars, and break windows anywhere they happen to be. Never mind their violence is increasing, every day. It's only “a Republican EFFORT to criminalize them.” Funny; it seems very real, to me. Yes, Islamic terrorism IS a real threat. But DOMESTIC terrorism is, too. And they're closer, and well funded by the Democrats and George Soros. They blame Trump for it, of course. He has supplanted George Bush as their “whipping boy.” Mostly because he is in the process of destroying all their damned fool works. They hate him with a passion I haven't seen before, because of that. (The Intercept)

Of Course It's Racism!

With liberals, EVERYTHING is racism if it disagrees with their perverted views. So, of COURSE more gun freedom is racist, And the NRA is guilty of racism, AND “fear mongering.” Ever since Obama got elected, partly on the promise that electing a black man (him) would END racism in this country, forever, like most of his lies, that didn't happen. In fact, he helped it INCREASE. The white against black racism we had almost conquered, and the new Black against WHITE racism he, and his accomplices created. Obama figured that would help Democrats (and of course, himself) by further dividing us, and fooling us into fighting among ourselves, so we would have no time, or interest in watching him, as he destroyed this country, as we knew it. (Just common sense)

Tempest In A Teapot

The Democrats are causing a lot of hassles in DC with their “smoke and mirrors” attempt to convince the world that the only reason they lost so big in the last election was through what the Russians did, and that Trump was “in collusion” with them. They're causing millions, maybe BILLIONS (with a “B”) of dollars to be spent and wasted the time of hundreds of people to try and find unfindable “evidence” of that collusion; evidence that does not exist, because there was no such collusion. Now they're bi....er whining about the “process,” screaming that Devon Nunes should either”recuse himself” or just resign his position because he's “just too close to Trump” to be “bipartisan” in the matter. Nunes has admirably “given them the finger” and said, “I'm not going anywhere!” in response to their silly crying. And Democrats are stamping their feet from a lying down position on the floor and shedding crocodile tears because he won't do as they say. The whole thing is a big LOAD of BS, and the public is beginning to realize it. (Town Hall)

Keeping Students Defenseless

Mike Bloomberg is determined to keep college students defenseless in the face of the growing threat from crazies who just want to kill a lot of people, to Islamic terrorists who want to kill everybody who doesn't convert to their phony “religion.” His deluded women's branch, MOMS Against Guns (or something like that), is similarly determined. He's putting out a lot of money in several states to keep them from passing “concealed carry” and “constitutional carry” laws. Common sense tells us that the BEST defense against an ILLEGAL gun, brought to school, is a LEGAL gun in the hands of a responsible student, teacher, or other staff. Not a uniformed officer, who can be isolated and “dealt with” before any actual shooting of students or staff can begin. I don't know what keeps Bloomberg going, except stupidity, and the need to have SOMETHING to do, since he can't ILLEGALLY run for mayor of New York, any more (they're onto him). (Breitbart)

Nothing Better To Do

Democrats have nothing better to do than to complain about every move Trump, or anybody who agrees with him, makes. Their latest hissy fits include carping abut Trump having the audacity to use KETSUP on his steak, and Kellyanne Conway putting her feet up on a white House couch. It seems to me they have more important things to do than gripe about unimportant things like that. But they don't. They're desperately searching for something, ANYTHING, to use to criticize Trump. Everything he does, they paint in the worst way possible, even if it would benefit millions of Americans. They have no idea how STUPID that makes them look, and how it puts them further into the minority. (News Max)

What's In It for Trump?

Democrats keep saying things like, “Trump is on a rampage to destroy the planet!” Hee, hee, har, har! What a good belly laugh that is! What the hell is inthat for Trump, OR the Republican Party, which they include in their deluded screaming? They don't think they are just too DUMB to do it, they think they are doing it ON PURPOSE. But what's in it for them to destroy the planet? It's lack of logic (which they think doesn't exist, anyway) like this that leads to confusion over just what is real. Things like their contention that, “The rich stole their riches from the poor.”

How is that possible, if the poor have nothing to steal? If they HAVE something to steal, then they're not poor, are they? What a bunch of boobs the Democrats are if they really believe these things! But they don't. They just want US to believe them. They do believe we're dumb enough to believe them. And if we demonstrate LACK of belief in their pipe dreams, they just call us names, since they have no other logical arguments. They say the GOP is happy to destroy the country if it gives them political advantage. But what the hell GOOD is political advantage if the country is destroyed? (Alternet)

Hypocrite Personified

Leland Yee, one of the most virulent anti-gun voices in the California legislature, has been CONVICTED, of what? Gun trafficking! I guess he figured that the more legal guns he could dispense with, the more ILLEGAL guns he could sell. That this is “hypocrite personified” goes without saying, and brings into question the motives of other anti-gun fools. In pleading for mercy, Yee said this: “In the 67 years of my life, I have devoted much of it to the work of the community, to people here in San Francisco and in the state of California.” But of course, that raises the question, what was he doing “on the side” all those years to benefit the illicit gun industry? He also said that he had hurt his family and his supporters, and that would “weigh on me the rest of my life.” Yeah, riiiight! He's just sorry he got caught. (Washington Post)

The Wrong Approach

Some people say the “High Five Days” program started by the Northampton, Mass. Cops to teach kids that cops can be friends, and are “normal people” in addition to their jobs to keep order should be ended because it takes cops off the streets. But cops can be well used to befriend kids, which can KEEP them from becoming criminals. That stops crimes BEFORE they are committed. That's just as important as catching criminals AFTER they've committed a crime. It's “preventative policing.” But some people are too dumb to realize that. Keeping cops in their patrol cars, on the street, is good policing. But PREVENTING crime is good policing, too, and is time well invested. Kids who are taught to distrust and dislike cops are much more likely to BECOME criminals. And this program is designed to prevent that. (Freedom's Phoenix)

One Sentence Repeal Act

There are a few intelligent politicians left in DC, I guess. But the ones who wrote Trump's bill apparently aren't on that list. Their bill retained some of the worst things in Obamacare, to be passed under a new name. This was supposed to fool the world into thinking Obamacare was “gone,” but, as some politicians said, it was “Obamacare lite.” Alabama Congressman Mo Brooks (R-AL) introduced a ONE-SENTENCE bill to repeal Obamacare, and all changes mandated within. and easily understood, even by other members of Congress (and might even be READ by them). Replacing those eliminated parts that represent a “replacement” of Obamacare (if it's really necessary) can be done piecemeal, with similar one-sentence bills, immediately, or later. as needed. A huge, multi-thousand page bill that cannot be understood, even by those writing it, is not a requirement. (The Blaze)

Big Miscalculation

Democrats assumed the female vote was theirs, just as they assumed other things in the 2016 election. I'm not saying miscalculating the female vote “did them in,” but it certainly helped. More and more women arming themselves and getting training that lets them be the equal to men in handing guns. Democrats assumed the female vote was “a done thing,” and it wasn't. As they gained knowledge in the use and handling of guns, which gave them a lot more confidence in their ability to defend themselves without depending on the men in their lives, they moved consistently AWAY from the Democrat Party, which is pretty much dedicated to taking away our constitutional right to self defense, and to own and carry a gun. Democrats miscalculated many things, and continue to do so. Which is why they will continue to lose to people like Donald Trump, and those who support his programs. They continue to think somebody cheated, and stole the election. That way, they don't have to change their playbook and admit they beat themselves. (Washington Examiner)

Ending "Gun Control"

Trump has promised to end gun control, as we know it, today. And he is already working on a measure to end "gun-free zones" in public schools, nationwide. Other anti-gun laws are in his sights. But the fight is far from over. Local "authorities" are still dominated by anti-gun fools who will continue to make their illogical and stupid "anti-gun laws." Gun-free zones, for instance, have been a massive failure. Every mass shooting but two, so far, have taken place IN a "gun-free zone." Potential mass shooters SEARCH OUT gun-free zones in which to do their dirty work. Many other gun crimes have taken place there. Such as in Wal-Mart or Target Store parking lots.

But even though Trump knows better, local politicians and bureaucrats do NOT. They don't care how many innocent people they get killed with their silly "flights of fancy" they call, "common sense gun laws." Pressure from above in the next four, maybe eight years will have an effect on that, but it will not be total. The locals will continue to make their silly laws, and private organizations will still fall for the "gun-free zone" myth, and the other anti-gun myths that become law. So you need to be alert, and get rid of known anti-gun fools in your legislatures. One anti-gun writer says the Aurora Theater shooter said nothing about CHOOSING a gun-free zone as evidence that gun-free zones are not "chosen" by mass shooters. as if what he SAID or did not say was evidence of his thinking. But if you listen closely tho what he DOES say, he did. (Politifact)

Political Incompetence

I've always thought politicians were incompetent in managing our money, which is why they are constantly wishing to raise our taxes. They think they're not screwing enough money out of us when it's the other way around. They waste so much of the money we DO give them that they're constantly in need of a higher percentage of our hard-earned cash to support their socialistic giveaways. Then we find out they LOST $10 TRILLION dollars, and nobody seems able to figure out where it went. They'd need to raise our taxes a LOT to make up for that amount of fiscal incompetence! And they're out to do just that. They've done audits everywhere but the Pentagon (who seems to have escaped an audit because “it would take too much time and cost too much,” ironically. Only an incompetent politician could “lose track of” $10 TRILLION (with a “T”!) dollars, which, apparently, has vanished without a trace. (DC Clothesline)

She Calls It Common Sense

And then she goes on to say that “Gun-free zones work. There is no evidence they don't.” Really? What about the fact that all but TWO mass shootings in the United States have occurred IN gun free zones? And what about all the criminals who have chosen to rob and KILL people in gun free zones, such as a Wal-Mart or a Target Stores parking lot? Maybe it is just that you choose to IGNORE such stories, so you can maintain your anti-gun narrative. Courtney Stewart, the writer of this article only graduated high school in 2003, and is obviously too young to know ANYTHING. She hasn't been on this world long enough to know anything. Yet she pretends to “school” others on things she obviously knows nothing about. Gun-free zones ARE “magnets” for bad guys who want to do us damage. The evidence IS there, even if she chooses not to see it. It's as obvious as the nose on her face, but she probably can't see that, either. (Citrus County Chronicle)

Million MOMS Against Guns

Or something like that. They held a "massive rally" in Topeka, Kansas, the other day--and 44 people showed up. I guess nobody cares about their brand of gun control in Topeka. That's happening more and more recently, as outfits like theirs plan "massive rallies" that draw very few people. You'd think they'd get the idea that fewer and fewer people give a damn about their efforts to violate the Constitution's Second Amendment and make us DEFENSELESS against the millions of ILLEGALLY armed criminals and terrorists out there. They just can't get it through their thick skulls that more and more intelligent people don't believe their BS any more, and so don't show up for their "rallies." I guess fools will always be with us, and this is the best proof of it. (CJ Online)

"What Isn't, IS!"

“And what is, ISN'T!” That seems to be what liberals want us to think, and are determined to convince us, whether we like it or not. Take their insistence that “The rich stole all their money from the poor.” How is it possible to steal what ISN'T THERE? If the poor are so poor, what can “the rich” steal? And if the “rich” have to steal their riches from the poor, are they really rich? Then there's the word I heard just the other day that “some women have penises.” (If they have a penis, they're MEN) And that “men can menstruate". (Menstruation requires a certain kind of “plumbing,” therefore, a vagina and associated organs are required) ” Then they tell us that “most Muslims are peaceful” while Muslims, all over the world are raping and murdering innocent people. They completely IGNORE the fact that Muslim terrorists are “pouring” into this country by the thousands, and soon will be killing more and more people in America, while liberals continue to tell us most Muslims are peaceful. (Just common sense)

"You gotta Be Nuts!

If you think gun control (as we know it) saves lives! That's what comedian Jackie Mason said (with an added comment by me). Mason seems to be "the voice of reason" we sorely need, these days. There's no telling how many people gun control (as we know it) has killed, while the "gun-haters" apparently don't care. They have an INSANE hatred of GUNS and want to disarm everybody (except those gun-haters who carry their own guns, anyway, or can hire armed security). Mason says that gun-control politicians who go about behind a wall of armed security while denying us the same right, "just don't care" how many innocent people they get killed by disarming law-abiding people. (Breitbart)

DC Gun Laws Work?

They say their gun laws have kept DC safe for years. Hardy har, har! Thanks, Newsweak, I needed a good laugh, and that's the best one I've had all week (giggle, gasp!). They call Trump's words "extreme and divisive," and that his rhetoric is "little more than empty promises." They are disturbed that he is KEEPING his promises. One of their "fears" is that Trump will "mess with" DC's gun laws, which they say have "protected DC for years." Why then, does DC rank right up there, right behind Chicago as one of the most dangerous places in which to live, because of all the gun violence? Now let's look at the FACTS, rather than fantasy: There is a distinct UPTICK in gun violence in DC this year, just as there has been for all recent years. That's what this magazine ignores. They're running an average total of almost 500 gun crimes a year, and Chicago has to "step lively" to stay ahead of them. And Newsweak has the audacity to say their laws have made DC safer? I have to giggle every time I think of how DUMB they are! (Newsweak)

Kaepernick: Unemployed Loser

Colin Kaepernick infamously refused to stand up while the National Anthem was played before his games. He thought that would have no effect upon his career. He was joined by several other players who have heard, and bought the crap put out by the liberal media, and was demonstrating” against a country he THOUGHT was nasty, allowed to do so by that very country, which is probably the only one in which he could get away with it. If he did that is, say, N. Korea, he'd be instantly killed, maybe personally by that pot-bellied, pint-sized, fat dictator who so loves himself he likes to applaud himself. Now he is no longer a highly paid quarterback. He is an unemployed loser who says now, too late, that he will stand in the future. (DC Clothesline)

"No Evidence to Support"

That's a favorite statement for liberals. They say, "There's no evidence to support" this, and "no evidence to support" that, when there IS, and they ignore it, so they can say that. Such is the case here, where they say "There's no evidence to support the theory that a 'good guy with a gun in the crowd' can stop a BAD guy with a gun," while there IS evidence it is true. MASSIVE amounts of it, which they roundly IGNORE, while spouting their lies. They still think that, if the average person were allowed to carry a gun legally, they'd "go insane" and kill somebody over a trifle, like a fender-bender or an argument over a parking space. They discount all the MILLIONS of guns there are already out there in the hands pf gang members, who do, and others, who are simply criminals. In a church in Colorado Springs, CO, an armed worshiper they CALLED a "security guard DID stop such a mass shooting, before the shooter could kill more than two. And there are uncountable such instances, which they ignore. (WTSP TV)

Unarmed Cops Is INSANE!

Sir Bernard Hogan-Howe, the outgoing commissioner of Scotland Yard, fervently believes in armed policemen. He even said that in his final speech as commissioner. He decried the refusal of many cops to carry guns. Whoever originally fostered the whole idea of cops without guns was INSANE, and has gotten many cops killed, since criminals usually don't feel the same way, and don't hesitate to shoot cops. The attack on Parliament in England, where an unarmed cop was stabbed to death by the killer before he, himself, was shot and killed by other ARMED cops and his threat ENDED. He noted that one in eight officers refuse to carry guns, in spite of reports like the terrorist killings in France, while the cops had to cower behind their cars and let the perps get away, since they weren't armed, If I were a cop (and I used to be), I'd CERTAINLY want to be armed, to "level the playing field" with the criminals. (Irons In the Fire)

IS It Terrorism?

What's going on in London, even as I write this, is described as “terrorism,” although they have so far studiously avoided the word “ISLAMIC” in their description. Probably because nobody ran around shouting “Allahu Akbar!” while killing people. But it is certainly SOME kind of terrorism. I, like the British, will not “jump the shark” and call it “Islamic terrorism” until intelligence proves it, even though I don't know who else harbors enough hate to do such a thing. So far, at least four people are dead, including at least one police officer. I'd bet the cop who died is the one who confronted the knife-wielder and got stabbed. Word is this cop was unarmed, and he shouldn't have been. ALL cops should be armed, because they are opposed by CROOKS who are armed, not being disarmed by liberal fools, as are many cops in Britain and some other countries. Please know that this is still unfolding, and by the time this is posted, many things may have changed. Many stories published right now talk about 2 people being killed. Others say 4. There may be more. There are, at this time, 20 injured, some critically. Update: ISIS is now taking credit for the London attack. They say it's revenge for Mosul. Apparently they think we should never do any return attacks. (Time)

Are They Really That Stupid?

"Teachers will kill their Students!' That's what politicians say about the law they are debating now in SC to allow teachers and other school staff to be armed, so they can stop a potential school mass shooter before he can kill lots of kids. Kill their students? Very doubtful, unless a student comes at them with his own gun and tries to kill THEM (and there are gang members in school). They say if the teacher "stashes his gun in his desk, a kid could get his hands on it, and kill a few people. As if the teacher isn't smart enough to keep the gun on his person and CONTROL access to it. They always base their objections on what "might" happen if the gun holder is completely stupid and irresponsible--which they would be TRAINED not to be. They think teachers are really STUPID and can't be trusted to be armed, They are actually thinking of themselves. (Post and Courier)

Chicago Ignorance Again

Chicago "authorities" say "guns are racist, and are a public health issue." Further, they say that gang violence is CAUSED by "white privilege." How blind and stupid ARE these people? Guns are NOT racist, nor are they a "public health issue." And they are NOT "caused by white privilege." That's just an effort to divert blame from their own stupidity. Gang violence is caused by stupid black people who would rather shoot each other than have a meaningful discussion about their differences. It is a PEOPLE issue, not a public health issue. The politicians in Chicago have no idea how to stem gun violence, so they blame it on everything BUT what it really is, which does NOTHING to solve the problem, but no doubt makes them "feel better about themselves." (Chicago Sun-Times)

Judges Have One Job

To support the law. To rule ACCORDING to the law, as written. That's as written in legislation, OR in the Constitution. That's ALL. They don't get to inject their own personal prejudices into their rulings, nor can they rule, guided by foreign law, or the unbridled utterances of a presidential candidate at a rally. They must be guided by OUR law, or the Constitution. Judge Gorsuch is a “rare breed.” He knows that, and that's how he rules, in every case, even if he personally, does not agree. The Constitution is NOT “a fluid document.” It is NOT “subject to change, according to current situations.” Some legislators (mostly Democrats, but a few RINOS, too) think otherwise. But they don't have the RIGHT to say otherwise, especially in their legislation. Gorsuch should be certified as a member of the Supreme Court, not because he sometimes rules for conservatives, but because he rules EXCLUSIVELY according to the law or the Constitution. (Just common sense)

"Blind Sheikh" Dead

Omar Abdel Rahman, known as "The Blind Sheikh," because he WAS blind, died in prison the other day, after a long battle with diabetes and other ailments often found in "senior citizens." He was 78. He was the "mastermind" behind the first World Trade Center bombing that only killed six, but injured thousands. Such should be the fate of ALL Islamic terrorists who want to kill lots of "non-believers" for no other reason but that they don't believe in his phony "religion." Islamic terrorists will regard him as a "martyr," and will no doubt use his death behind bars as yet another excuse to kill some more "unbelievers." There's nothing wrong with that, except for the deaths and injuries caused by his "followers." We need to create as many martyrs as we can. That's all they're good for. Throw his body in the dumpster outside the prison. That will show him the "respect" he has "earned." His family, supporters, and an Egyptian Human Rights organization were demanding he be released, and returned to Egypt, due to his deteriorating health, as was a terrorist involved in an airline bombing in Lockerbie, Scotland, who was feted and treated as a hero upon returning to Libya. They called is "compassionate release." But neither deserved it. He deserved to die in prison for his sins, and he did. The Lockerbie murderer was said to have only 3 months to live, but lived another two years, in freedom, treated as a hero when he was scum of the Earth. (NY Times)

Going After the Family

Bill Clinton jealously guarded Chelsea's privacy during his presidency, vilifying anybody who tried so much as to publish a PICTURE of her. Until it became politically expedient to use her. Obama did the same for his two daughters. But now that Trump is in office, HIS family is "fair game" to Democrats, who even attacked Trump's ten-year-old CHILD! Then they sponsored a boycott of Ivanka's clothing line, and when Kellyanne tried to kill it, they tried to kill HER (figuratively)! They're going after his son-in -law, and, I'm sure will soon be going after his GRANDMOTHER. Nobody in his family is safe from being "run down" by Democrats. Nobody practices more sickening politics than Democrats. Yet, if Republicans did the same things, they'd have KITTENS! It's too bad we have to allow Democrats into the political process, at all, as sickeningly STUPID as are their antics, like BUYING riots and such to make it LOOK like a majority is with them, which it is NOT. (Patriot Tribune)

Elites Terrified of Trump

Trump promised to “drain the swamp in DC” and that's exactly what he's doing—and it scares the panties off the “elites” in Washington, who see the possibility of their little fiefdoms being dismantled. So they invented the “Russian connection” as a scam to discredit Trump as president, even though he beat the pants off them in the election. They want him to get off this “drain the swamp” thing and govern the way THEY tell him to govern, or they'll come up with something to use to impeach him. What they're saying is, “Knuckle under or you're fired!” I predict that trump will “give them the finger” and go right on “draining the swamp,” and as each one “goes down in flames,” the others will huff and puff and try to blow his house down—and will fail. If they DON'T fail, we're lost. We will soon be a socialist nation, much like the communist nation Russia used to be. Communism and socialism are close cousins. Both are BASED on the THEFT of the products of human industry from those who are willing to WORK to support themselves, to give, UNEARNED, to those who don't, or WON'T. It's a system that WILL ultimately fail in time, as it always has. Russia is one of the latest examples, as communism failed and was replaced by socialism, Which will fail in it's own time. But they'll “go down fighting” as will the elites in this country. (Just common sense)

Do They Want Him Dead?

With all the stupid things the secret Service has been doing lately, one wonders if some of them really WANT him dead, so they get very sloppy in their “protection” of the president. They were so unobservant that they twice lately allowed a “fence jumper” to wander all over the White House grounds for up to 20 minutes before he was apprehended. Some of them took “selfies” of themselves with Donald Trump III while he slept, instead of manning their posts. Is this part of a scheme to rid us of the “Trump curse” once and for all? Many of the SS agents were hired by the Obama administration so they're probably liberals, and it wasn't considered likely that they'd hate him enough to want to be lax in their duties and allow somebody to kill him? (iPatriot)

More Fake Gun News

You'd think NBC News would be a little more careful in the stories it runs, wouldn't you? But they're not. Or they WANT to run fake news, as long as it advances their fake narrative to disarm honest, law-abiding people. They say that, since gun parts can be sent to customers and AREN'T guns, at that point, it is LEGAL to make and sell them to criminals and crazies. That they only become guns AFTER the customer finishes the assembly, and that is LEGAL. There's only one little problem. that's FALSE. And The ATF SAID it's false. Apparently, they didn't bother to, as this Free Beacon writer did, ASK them. They just ran with the LIE. The more I hear about this kind of thing, the less I respect the media. There's no use watching it, because they tell so many lies, it's hard to tell what's true and what's not. So I just stay away from the liberal media so it doesn't pollute my mind. (Washington Free Beacon)

Holding Obama Accountable

It is a known fact that the Obama administration was one of the most lawless in the history of presidencies. He got away with a lot of lawbreaking in his 8 years in power because he controlled the means of investigation of scandals. One of the first scandals in his administration was the “Fast and Furious” scam, where the ATF pushed the gun-running to Mexican drug cartels, supposedly so they could track those gun sales to sources in America and thus, use that as an excuse to make more anti-gun laws. Bush did something similar, but he put GPS sensors in the guns to ALLOW him to track the guns. Obama did NOT. Furthermore, Eric Holder REFUSED to turn over some documents concerning it to Congress and was “held in contempt.” But what happened to him as a result? Ordinary people would have gone to jail. But not Holder. And the Obama administration got into “hot water” for delaying the approval for “right-wing organizations” who applied for tax exempt status.

Lois Lerner lost her job over that, but she continues to collect her “golden parachute” while sitting home relaxing. There were many other scams and schemes that arose around Obama, but none of them ever “bore fruit” because he controlled the means of prosecution and investigation. One was the meeting between then Attorney General Loretta Lynch and ex president Clinton on the tarmac at an airport just before the FBI announced that no charges would be brought against his wife in her e-mail scandal. Obama, Lynch, and Holder have not been held to account for these, and other scandals, but new AG Sessions may change all that. He is going to investigate, and if a special counsel is indicated, one will be appointed, with the power to bring charges, if underlying crimes are discovered. (American Patriot Daily)

Extreme Vetting for Gun Buyers

Again, the incompetent leaders in Chicago want to make yet another law, on top of those already in effect, that will not do ANYTHING to reduce the gun violence they seem to be so worried about. Using a play on Trump's words, they want to create an "extreme vetting" program for legal gun buyers. forget the fact that they already have that, in CURRENT laws. Just try and buy a gun LEGALLY without "extreme vetting." Of course, this completely IGNORES the fact that neither the current law NOR the new one proposed will affect ILLEGAL gun buyers, in the least. Illegal gun buyers don't subject themselves to "vetting."Can anybody show me a gang member who bought his gun legally? Gang wars over trivial things like the wrong person being in a gang's "turf." And they continue unabated. No "crackdown" on gangs is planned, and that's what they need. Meanwhile, they concentrate on people who OBEY the law. I had a Chicago Tribune story about this, but I couldn't get past their "anti-ad blocker" notice. If you don't have an ad blocker, maybe you'll have better luck. (Chicago Tribune)

Gun-Grabber Fake News

This story was run in the Knoxville Sun-Sentinel and asserts that "constitutional carry" is dangerous. This is the usual gun-grabber lie, and they not only bought it, they're carrying it on further by spewing it in their pages, without ANY stats to back it up. This IGNORES the millions of ILLEGAL guns already on the streets, many of which are in the hands of gang members, who are mostly too young to have a gun, but get them easily, ILLEGALLY, anyway. It also ignores the adult criminals who not only break the law in buying their guns, they break the law, period. then there are the thousands of Islamic terrorists pouring into this country every day. People who have PROMISED to kill as many of us who will not convert to their phony "religion as they can. That's what they DO! And allowing honest, law-abiding citizens to carry guns for self defense is NOT DANGEROUS to anybody but illegally armed CRIMINALS why try to victimize them. Gun-haters just will never understand that law-abiding people will NOT "go wild" if they have a gun in their pocket and kill somebody over a fender bender or a real or imagined slight (as gang members do on a regular basis with their illegal guns). Or they just REFUSE to understand it because it doesn't fit their preconceived notions. (Ammoland)

Blame It On Trump

You probably heard about “Gander Mountain” going bankrupt. Gander Mountain relies heavily on gun sales and hunting for their business, and, according to the “wizards of smart” in this article, you can blame Trump for that. Why? Because Trump pledged to protect the Second Amendment, so people are no longer afraid of more and tighter “gun laws” by the feds. Thus, they're buying fewer guns and hunting less. Which puts Gander Mountain's failure squarely on Trump. That's how liberals think. ANYTHING that goes against their “scholarly rhetoric” is somebody's fault. They're right, about Trump's policy being responsible for reducing gun sales, but that's not something to be BLAMED on somebody. As to Gander Mountain's bankruptcy, has anybody ever heard about bad management? Gander Mountain is not the only company to go out of business lately, and it's because of OBAMA'S policies, not Trump's. Obama's bad management of the government is responsible for MANY bankruptcies, many of them in the insurance business, due to his disastrous Obamacare system. Other bankruptcies are part and parcel of his policies, and Gander Mountain is not unusual. Some of America's biggest businesses have gone out of business in the last eight years. Businesses we thought were “forever.” (The Street)

Shouldn't Even Be A Fight

This shouldn't even BE a fight. Obama's "rules change" that told his bureaucrats to put the names of elderly people who requested others to handle their finances on the "no-gun list" as a means of disarming yet another group of law-abiding people, should never have been made. Just asking others to handle your finances does NOT mean you are "mentally deficient." Yet the "fight continues," as anti-gun fools line up to KEEP that rule in place, even though it is obviously patently WRONG. But that makes no difference to liberals in government. Anything that will disarm large numbers of people is something they want to keep, even though it is unconstitutional, and WRONG. (Bearing Arms)

Short-Sighted Action

The "authorities" went through a complicated series of actions after a "concealed carrier" came to the defense of a cop who was in danger of being murdered by a damned fool motorist, He came upon the scene while the "bad guy" was "beating the hell" out of the cop, had taken his gun, and was about to kill him. Whereupon this hero warned him, and when he did not stop, "put three" into him, killing him. He was then forced to suffer through a hearing to "clear him" against charges for killing that fool. He also was disarmed, by having his gun taken away, as "evidence." Like he was going to "take the gun and run." So a local gun store made him a GIFT of another gun to replace it. The facts of the case should have made both actions unnecessary. But not for bureaucrats. They must have "all the "Is dotted" and "Ts crossed," and all the paperwork in place. In a world where "black men" are commonly shot by other black men, this black man came to the rescue of a white cop, by shooting another black man in the act of killing that cop. Unlike in Ferguson, MO, where a cop doing a righteous killing was vilified and made out to be the "bad guy" by a very vocal minority, this case caused little outcry. (Bearing Arms)

"Only Whites Are Racist"

The University of California, Davis, says that blacks can't be racist, thus proving their colossal IGNORANCE. Blacks certainly CAN be racist! Not against blacks, because that would be really stupid. But against WHITES. And that's the kind of racism PROMOTED by Barack Obama, and the “Black Lives Matter” crowd. It's being promoted by blacks wanting to discredit all cops and destroy their effectiveness, because so many of them are criminals (not all, of course, THAT would be racist). A certain percentage of blacks (and even some whites) have taken up Obama's promotion, working HARD to “prove” that ALL whites are racists, which is also racist, on their part. They say blacks can't be racist because they don't have the power. But that's wrong. They're gaining power every day, through rioting, demonstrating, and LYING about cops “hunting blacks to shoot,” which is supremely stupid. It's the new kind of racism, and they're promoting hell out of it. (Daily Caller)

How Is It Possible?

Wal-Mart stores are "gun-free zones." Seems like one law-abiding person wasn't so law-abiding (or "house rule" abiding, anyway). He must have known Wal-Mart has a "house rule" making their stores and property a "gun-free zone." He was a legal concealed carrier, and brought his gun anyway. A good thing he did, because when he saw two guys having a knife fight, he stepped in and held them at gun point until the cops arrived, to take them into custody. He probably saved one, maybe two lives by so doing. He doesn't work for Wal-Mart, so they can't do anything to him for bringing his gun, though I'm sure they'd like to. Maybe they'll just ban him from coming there in the future, which is really stupid. Incidents where "good guys with guns" intervene to save lives seem to be coming more and more often. I don't know if they are being reported more, or are actually increasing as more and more people become concealed carriers. No matter. They prove us right when we say more guns in the hands of law-abiding people means more safety for everybody. Something the anti-gun fools steadfastly deny. (Bearing Arms)

Banning Lead In Bullets

Politicians and bureaucrats have "jumped on" lead poisoning from bullet fragments to allow them to ban lead in ammunition because doctors don't bother to look for, and remove lead fragments unless they're in dangerous places in the body. In the United States, there is routine testing for lead in the body in occupations where lead poisoning is likely. Which proves they KNOW it is a danger, but still don't bother to remove them. It IS only a small number of people affected in this way, but I'm sure it looks large to the victims of such laziness. Dying from being shot has long been laughingly called "lead poisoning," but this proves it's no joke. It's a REAL cause of death. It's just yet another way to make buying and using a gun more expensive and difficult. (CNN)

He Really Believes It!

It's too bad they don't have the equivalent of the 25^th Amendment in N. Korea, because Kim Jong Un is obviously deranged. He actually thinks he can beat the U. S. In a war. He's the real embodiment of “The Mouse That Roared.” He really thinks that, with his THREE nukes, he can successfully threaten America into submission. What will really happen is that, if he fires ONE MISSILE in the direction of the United States, his entire country will cease to exist, ten minutes later. He, himself, will be a cinder and his country will be a steaming pile of junk, to be plowed under. He's run his mouth a lot lately, and maybe he'd better keep what he has and not go after his betters. America will crap in his soup if he doesn't shut up, and there's nothing he can do about it. (World Net Daily)

It's gonna Keep Happening

Conservatives should not get discouraged at the large number of attempts being made to discredit, even remove Trump from office that seem to come out every time he moves. And sometimes when he doesn't. It's all part of the Democrat scheme to inhibit Trump's administration as much as they can, for as long as they can. They come up with spurious reasons incessantly, to hold up his appointments to his Cabinet, and their opposition to his appointment of a Supreme Court nominee will take on epic proportions; both the current one, and the next--especially the next, because it will change the makeup of the Court for generations to come. And it will continue as long as Trump, and following him, Pence, is in the Oval Office. Count on it. Get USED to it. They'll keep it up forever, if necessary, and it won't hurt Trump a bit. He will "steamroller" over them, as he has done since he announced his candidacy. They SAY he has done NOTHING in his first month, while he has done MUCH. They say his White House is "in shambles," but can't point out a REAL way it is. He can deal with it, and he will. (Just common sense)

Anti-Gun Insanity

At a Spokane, Washington hockey game between two different law-enforcement organizations, the county sheriff came to watch. But he was denied entrance until he disarmed himself. The SHERIFF of the county! The top law enforcement officer of the county! What insanity is this? What if a criminal had brought his gun in ILLEGALLY, and decided to kill a few people? What would this sheriff be able to do? Watch in horror as his fellow citizens were killed by this criminal, who doesn't obey laws? This is how the INSANITY of the anti-gun fools works. They never think about the unintended consequences of their silly actions. They just do it, and to hell with those who die because of it. These people get others KILLED, but they don't care, as long as they can disarm everybody and make them defenseless against ILLEGALLY armed criminals. (Ricochet)

"Can't Handle the Truth!"

That's a line that comes from a popular movie, and it has entered the vernacular because it is a truism. The best recent example of that is the Democrat Party, which just can't believe they LOST the election they thought was “in the bag” for Hillary. They can't handle the truth that Trump won, on the promise to “drain the swamp” in DC. And he's DOING it, and doing it effectively. They're throwing everything they can think of “up against the wall,” hoping SOMETHING will stick. Nothing has. They're talking about impeaching him on some manufactured “offense,” with little over a month in office. He has been very effective in “draining the swamp” so far, and that that's what they hate, since they're “part of the swamp.” Now they're trying to get him removed as mentally deficient. But the only people who ARE mentally deficient are the Democrats and the liberal media, if they think they can beat him the way they're going. (Washington Post)

Protecting the Criminal

This state senator in Florida says concealed carry is more needed than ever in the wake of the Ft. Lauderdale Airport shooting. Unlike anti-gun fools, he has a brain and it's working. What if there had been a licensed gun carrier next to the guy who opened fire on everybody that day, who could have "taken him out" before he got a chance to kill a bunch of people? that would be a good thing, right? But anti-gun fools don't think so. They think it's an excuse to make even more USELESS "gun laws" that do not work and get people killed. The only people these laws protect are the criminals, who don't obey ANY laws or regulations. If they mean to kill a bunch of people, what the hell do they care about their piddling laws that say they can't even BUY a gun? Steube is, of course, a Republican. Democrats aren't intelligent enough to support such laws. (The Gun Writer)

Blaming the Victims

Of course. Memphis Police Director Michael Rawlings blames a new law in Tennessee for the rise in crime, because it allows people to carry their gins and store them in their cars, even without a permit to do so. But guns were being stolen way before this. He cites the 851 guns taken from cars (out of 2,000 total stolen, as opposed to 348 stolen from cars in 2013 [he didn't say how many were stolen elsewhere in that period], before the law was passed). His theory was proven false by the fact that MORE guns were stolen from other places. Guns WILL be stolen, no matter where they're stored. Yes, a few more were stolen from cars after the law was passed, but the number is still smaller than the TOTAL of guns stolen, and that is NOT due to the law. But then, anti-gun fools will always twist ANY stats they can to make pro-gun legislation look bad. And this "police politician" is no different. (WREG)

"Just Because He Smiled"

He MUST be “in cahoots” with the Russians, because he just smiled when asked about it. That's what MSNBC's Chris Mathews thinks, anyway. Even though it's an ABSURD idea that the Russians WOULD meddle with our elections to benefit Trump, they continue to insist on it, using ANYTHING they can to “prove” it. Hillary OR Bernie would be a LOT better for their purposes, because both are socialists, and Trump is NOT, at least, to my knowledge. Their whole idea lacks logic, but then, liberals think there IS no such thing as logic. But to impute collaboration with the Russians based on a SMILE, reveals their desperation. Liberals (Democrats) are desperately searching for something, ANYTHING, to use against Trump, and they aren't finding anything important. So they take what they can get, even if it is absurd. And this is as absurd as it gets. (News Busters)

They Went Too Far

As usual, the "one size fits all" theory of government regulation strikes again. Yes, there are a FEW people so deranged they should never be allowed near a gun (some of them are in the government). But this rule, put out by Obama as he went out the door, and which he attempted to make irreversible, BANNED gun ownership, not on their mental inability, but on their asking someone else to handle their finances. That took a constitutional right away from a large segment of our society that HAS no mental disability. This is the typical kind of over regulation of the Obama administration, which gladly, is OVER. And Congress has seen fit to end it, contrary to Obama's effort to make it something they could NOT stop. (Washington Post)

Getting Around the Law

Most politicians know they can't just BAN guns, so they do everything they can short of it to make life harder for those who want to buy, sell, or carry their guns for self defense. Their "gun safes," "trigger locks," and "gun-free zones" are ways to that end. They're talking now about making it almost impossible to buy ammunition, without which guns are useless. In Connecticut, the governor wants to raise fees for "carry permits" to unaffordable levels so only the richest of folks can afford it. Or the "security" those people can afford to buy. Governor Malloy wants to cover up his incompetent budget management on the backs of those who want to "carry" by raising the fee from the current $70 (plus an added state fee of another $70 total $140.00), to a total of $300.00, with a $300 renewal fee every five years. Buying a gun is expensive enough, without "carry fees" that rival the cost of the gun, itself. (NRA-ILA)

Back To Five Days

I admit it. I'm getting old. I can no longer do seven days a week. It takes a lot of research daily to keep up with these blogs. Several years ago when I worked two days a week for Avis, it was easier. But I was younger. My biggest problem was walking. Not writing and researching. So starting this weekend, I'm reverting to a five day schedule, which might let me get a little ahead on my research with the two days gained. I need these blogs to stay alive. But not seven days a week. It's worked so far.

"The Right Is Violent"

That's what Trevor Noah thinks, anyway. What evidence on which he bases that opinion, I don't know. What I DO know is that the LEFT is very violent, and they prove it, every day with their “demonstrations” and riots where they burn cars, break expensive windows at random, and hurt people who don't agree with them and try to say so. Another thing I know is that the very show on which he expressed this ignorant opinion is a fool endeavor, run on CNN by Van Jones, an ADMITTED communist, who lost his job as one of Obama's “czars” because of it. And that was in OBAMA'S administration! That CNN is a left-leaning outfit is made even more obvious by the fact that they actually HIRED Van Jones for this gig. The odd thing is that Noah has no idea what an “extreme liberal” IS! Now that's real ignorance! And he is the anchor of his own show on CNN. People like that are supposed to know things, and if he has no idea what an extreme liberal is, maybe it's because he IS one. (Blabber Buzz)

The Deadly Duo

The anti-gun fools are worried. The appointment of Jeff Sessions as Attorney General signals a "new world" for them, and they don't like it. Couple that with the NRA, which is already a "thorn in their sides," and you have a "deadly duo" against their idea of gun control. Sessions knows the Constitution guarantees us the right to be armed in self defense, and he will do everything he can to stop their unconstitutional actions, in concert with the NRA, which has been working alone to do that, in the past, and is now JOINED by powerful assistance. They KNOW their efforts violate one of the most BASIC amendments, and they further know Sessions is not going to let them get away with the things they got used to getting away with under Obama and, before that, Bill Clinton. Bush (the younger) wasn't overly concerned with gun rights, on either side. The next 4 (or maybe 8) years are going to be hard ones for them. (AWR HAWKINS)

In Six More States

It's a trend, folks! Six more states are in the process of considering permitless concealed carry. apparently, some politicians are realizing that this is the way to reduce gun violence, by eliminating the ILLEGAL gun owners who prey on UNARMED citizens. The six states are Alabama, New Hampshire, Indiana, Kentucky, South Dakota, and Texas. Indiana is where I was born, so I appreciate that. What will really surprise me is if Colorado, where I now live, ever does the same, with its liberal-dominated legislature and governorship. Twelve other states already have permitless carry. Adding these will make it 18. A big part of the country. The country is slowly getting smart, although the anti-gun fools are horrified and are dragging their feet mightily. They're always horrified when laws are made to let people defend themselves. (Breitbart)

100% Abortion Mill!

I believe that Planned Parenthood is a 100% abortion mill. The argument is that if we defund Planned Parenthood, women will lose all the other services it provides. I don't believe that, for a minute! Somebody should provide me with a list of all the “other services” they perform, along with proof that they actually perform them. Word is that they are only 85% an abortion mill, and perform many other services toward women's health. That's sexist! Where is a MEN'S organization LIKE Planned Parenthood? But I digress. 15% “other services” aside, I'm against them because they DO abortions, not because of how many, or how few they do. Abortion KILLS an innocent baby! It's infanticide! And if it's done for the “convenience” of the parents who don't want to bother to raise the result of their unprotected sex. It's MURDER! And I am adamantly AGAINST murder--of anybody, for any reason. But particularly defenseless infants, still in the womb. The people who perform them are gutless cowards! (Just common sense)

Big Anti-Gun Rally!

A Wichita State University gun rally against "campus carry" was called to show their strength--and it did. All of 15 people showed up, including the speaker. Looks like almost NOBODY is interested in stopping people from carrying guns in self defense in Wichita. "The rally was in support of proposed legislation that would undo campus carry for law-abiding citizens, forcing said citizens to wander the campus defenseless like everybody else,except the bad guys, who have their ILLEGAL guns. I guess real people don't want to keep them defenseless like the anti-gun fools do, being unconstitutional notwithstanding. The people have shown their opposition to these high-handed fools who want to keep people defenseless against the millions of ILLEGAL guns already out there, being carried by people who want to do us ill. I really get tired of saying this and having it "bounce off" those fools who want everybody disarmed, in spite of the constitutional guarantee. (Breitbart)

War With Iran?

They're asking if "Trump is moving toward war with Iran" when the proper question is, is Iran moving toward war with us? After all those years of Obama letting them get away with murder, they think they can still do it. But "there's a new sheriff in town," and he isn't going to let them do it, any more, and they just can't get that through their thick skulls. NO Trump is NOT "moving toward war with Iran. If there is a war, it will be STARTED by Iran and might last a week, if they're lucky. That's about how long it took for us to take Saddam down, while his press flack was still saying they weren't losing while our tanks rolled by behind him. Those Mullahs aren't too intelligent. They think because they've taken down a few backward regimes, they can do the same to a REAL opponent. They're DOOMED to failure, and they don't even know it. Sure, they're got Russia for an ally, but I don't think Russia is as stupid as they are. They aren't going to go to war with us over a bunch of stupid mullahs in Iran. (Just common sense)

Not Any More!

Sen. Diane Feinstein made a stupid statement, the other day. She said, “There is a real danger, I believe, that the Justice Department has become politicized.” Not any more, Di! Where were you when Eric Holder refused to prosecute ANY black people because “they're MY people”? Meanwhile, Obama played golf. Or when acting AG Sandra Yates said she would NOT enforce ANY Trump law? (She was fired for that and I think she should go to prison) How about when they used “Operation Choke Point” to target certain businesses because they didn't “toe the federal line?” There are many more examples, but I don't have enough room here, nor the time to list them all. Maybe Di is “concerned” that the Trump administration will actually ENFORCE the law, and that will be bad for Democrats. I guarantee you Trump is going to get rid of as many Obama operatives that are left in his bureaucracy, just as soon as they reveal themselves, as Sally did. (Minuteman News)

They Still Have Judges

Over the years, the Democrats have appointed many judges in the federal courts, meaning they don't have to do much "judge shopping" to get the "rulings" they want when they can't win any other way. One would think a judge appointed by a Republican would be more intelligent than that. But not so with the judge that blocked Trump's executive order temporarily stopping the immigration of certain people until they can be properly vetted. I think this judge"s career on the bench should shortly be over. There are many ways to get rid of a "rogue judge," and I'd bet Trump knows them all, or soon will. Those judges are placed there as a "last resort" to get things done that they can't get done in the legislature, and by law. Judges are SUPPOSED TO rule according to the law. But somebody forgot to make a law allowing us to reverse them if they don't, except to send it to another court where there are probably more liberal judges to uphold their unlawful rulings. (Just common sense)

"B-tch-Slapped" In the Senate

Democrat Senator Elizabeth Warren was told to "sit down and shut up" in the Senate because she clearly violated "rule 19" when she attempted to read something Coretta Scott King wrote years ago to the Senate. She's now whining on Facebook about it, as if she had no idea she was breaking the rules. Of course, rules mean NOTHING to Democrats, and usually they get away with violating them because nobody usually wants to "take the steps necessary" to "call them out." She was surprised by a newly emboldened Republican Party that actually "called her" on her violation. Republicans are getting very tired of Democrats blocking every move they make that they can. Democrats loved to call Republicans "the party of no" when Obama was president, and now Democrats are REALLY "the party of no," opposing everything Republicans do, even if it's something Democrats would normally like. (Just common sense)

The Violent Ones

The Democrats like to blame Republicans (and Trump) for the violence that sometimes takes place at Trump rallies. But the blame is not his. It is theirs. They actually PAY thugs to create violence at Trump rallies, so they can blame one of Trump's statements for it. One time he quipped about “punching somebody in the mouth,” and they seized upon that to blame him for every incidence of violence THEY paid for. In another recent demonstration at Berkeley, California (Berkeley?) the cops had to intervene to keep demonstrators from getting violent with other demonstrators, who were on Trump's side. Schools SUSPEND students who demonstrate a preference for Trump. And then there are the FOUR Democrat supporters who beat the hell out of a Trump supporter and even VIDEOTAPED it and put it on the Internet (Dumb!). Democrat supporters recently beat up an old man because he was a Trump supporter. It is the DEMOCRATS who are “the violent ones,” without a doubt, if you pay attention to what's REALLY happening. (DC Clothesline)

Phony Climate "Science"

If I needed any more evidence that global warming (renamed "climate change" because global warming just wasn't happening) was a massive swindle, it would be provided by the recent revelation that NOAA (National Oceanographic and Atmosphere Administration) falsified climate science to show a "warming trend," when, in actuality, we are in an almost 20 year COOLING trend. They threw out REAL facts and substituted "computer model" figures, putting them out as fact. Even more proof is that, before that, Obama ORDERED NASA to falsify their true climate figures to support the swindle AlGore began and is still pushing, making billions from it. Global warming, under whatever name they want to use, is a SWINDLE, and Obama's government took it up, so they could charge us more in taxes "to fight global warming," and make more "rules" to better control us. AlGore is happy, It can only put more bucks in his pocket. (Natural News)

Increasing Gun Crime

That's what ALL the "gun laws" do, so far. But the anti-gun fools won't believe it when we tall them. Their minds are made up, so don't confuse them with facts. Gun safes, Safe gun storage laws, gun-free zones, even background checks only affect LEGAL gun owners, who don't commit most of the gun crimes. Those are committed mostly by ILLEGAL gun owners, who IGNORE such laws and rules. As an example, ALL (but 2) mass shootings have happened IN "gun-free zones." Would-be mass shooters SEEK OUT gun-free zones because they can be pretty sure legal gun owners, who OBEY laws, won't be armed, there. And they don't put their guns in gun safes at home, or practice "safe gun storage." They don't care. And there is NO WAY to get illegal gun owners to sit for a background check. Gun laws, as made today, are fruitless. They're USELESS to reduce gun crime, instead INCREASING it by disarming law-abiding people and making them DEFENSELESS against illegal gun owners, who obey NO laws. We tell them the answer, which is more law-abiding people with their own guns, being allowed to carry them everywhere. But they won't hear of it, and they're in places where they can get those useless laws passed. (Just common sense)

Organized Crime: The Feds

It's a simple swindle to extort millions, sometimes billions from large corporations. It's easy, really, when you hold all the cards. The government picks a victim. They phony up some kind of a “violation,” usually based on a subjective definition of the “rules” and announce a multi-million dollar (sometimes a multi-BILLION dollar) fine. Everybody thinks that money goes into the general fund. Not a chance. They then (quietly, without fanfare) go to that victim corporation and tell them they can get away for maybe HALF that outlandish fine by making a “donation” to one of their designated “non-profit” organizations, to which that victim RUSHES to make out a check, thus completing the extortion of that “victim” for the benefit of their “non-profit." Often, the money thus gained by the feds goes into paying those ubiquitous “demonstrators” that promote liberal positions. The mob would be proud! The “protection racket” the feds are running is VERY profitable! (iPatriot)

Against the Second

The Maryland Legislature is adamantly AGAINST the Second Amendment. They prove it, every time they pass one of their onerous "gun laws" that VIOLATE it. Laws such as the wrongly named "Maryland Firearms Safety Act," which is anything but. That law sent several firearms manufacturing companies elsewhere, where the government was more "friendly" to them, and caused some gun stores to simply close. While lawmakers were patting themselves on the back, cops were trying their best to put down the REAL problem, increasing gun crimes committed by ILLEGAL gun owners who get their guns out of the trunks of the cars owned by other criminals, in a back alley somewhere. something this law CANNOT reach. So far, ALL the "gun laws" only target LEGAL gun owners, who aren't the problem, for the most part. One of the most glaring failures where "gun laws" are concerned is the "gun-free zones"all over the country, not just in Maryland. Such zones only serve to INCREASE gun violence, as do all the other gun laws, But don't tell the anti-gun fools, they have a "tin ear" for that. They're convinced they're right, so don't confuse them with facts. (America's First Freedom)

Judges Aren't Too Smart

At least, not in the Fourth Circuit Court. They just said, in a ruling, that if you have a gun, you're automatically a "suspect." Now THAT is stupid! Judges should be smarter than that. Having a gun, LEGALLY, does NOT make you a "suspect." It only makes you better able to defend yourself against the REAL suspect, the man with an ILLEGAL gun. The fourth Circuit recently ruled that just carrying a gun (legally) makes you "suspect," until proven innocent. That violates the Fourth Amendment and the "innocent until proven guilty" theory, which is LAW in this country. Maybe these judges don't know that. If not, they have no business BEING on the Court. One judge said that merely carrying a gun (legally or otherwise) makes you a danger to others and subject to foregoing (losing) certain constitutional protections afforded to persons who do NOT carry guns. How big a fool does that make these judges? If they saw what I said, they might want to find me in contempt. They'd be right. I AM in contempt of this court. (America's First Freedom)

Bottom Line: Removal

It's a “coup attempt” by Obama and the Democrat Party that we are witnessing. The Democrats and other liberals have one goal: the REMOVAL of Donald Trump as president, whatever they have to do to accomplish it. They jump on every tiny mistake made by any of Trump's people and make a big thing of it, like Kellyanne Conway putting her feet on a couch in the Oval Office to get a good angle on a picture she was taking of the president and black leaders. Or how Mike Pence used an AOL e-mail account while governor of Indiana (which, I will emphasize is NOT illegal) while criticizing Hillary's use of a private e-mail server while Secretary of State, which WAS. Frankly, I think if Trump or one of his people lets a FART, they'll build that into a case of “fouling the atmosphere.” All they have today are the MINOR mistakes of Trump people, and they build them all into catastrophes. (Just common sense)

Gun Buyers Confident

People were buying guns at record levels during Obama's administration, because they were fearful that Obama would do even more to stop them from being able to defend themselves with a gun, if necessary. Now that Trump is in office, they have regained confidence that this will not happen. Trump has not only PROMISED to get rid of what Obama already accomplished in that arena (not much, thanks to the NRA and some other organizations), he will make laws making it all but impossible for liberals to do what Obama couldn't. Anti-gun fools will have a "tough road to hoe" in the next four (maybe 8) years. They've done this to the extent that the FBI says new background check applications have DROPPED by half a million, just in January. (Breitbart)

The Anti-Gun Fallacy

MIchael Bloomberg, one of the most virulent anti-gun fools, lives in a "gated community" guarded by men with guns, that they CALL a gun-free zone. So do many other anti-gun fools, and many (most) of them run around, surrounded by gun-carrying thugs. But they want to deny us the same right (guaranteed by the Constitution) to also have armed security, unless we can afford to HIRE it. One Senator thinks the way to self defense is to open our borders to Islamic terrorists, who have PROMISED to kill ALL "unbelievers," while taking away the guns from its citizens so they can't defend themselves. Sen. Chris Murphy (Democrat, of course), is that Senator. I don't know if he lives in such a community or not, but obviously he only talks to people who think the same way he does. So he's not intelligent enough to know how STUPID his thinking is. If we keep electing such damned fools to the Congress, we will continue to get STUPID "gun laws" made. (America's First Freedom)

Insane Liberal Ideas

When they got finished screwing up our health insurance, they didn't have anything else to do, so they started in on our sex lives and our sexuality. They started a campaign to let MEN into women's restrooms and changing rooms if they “identified” as women. No more than .03% of men are this way, but they treated it like it were a large number of people who just couldn't figure out a place to pee. If they felt funny in a men's room (they were men, after all, no matter how they “identified.”) They could always go into a booth and do their business there. There are excellent reasons for keeping the sexes separate when, and where, they “do their business.” Women don't want men peering at them when they take down their pants or raise their dress. Men WANT to be able to look at them for salacious reasons, even if they DO “identify” as women. Then they go after the definition of “marriage” with their campaign to make joining of two MEN or two WOMEN and using that word to describe it.

They don't have to use the word “marriage” to describe their unions, but that's what they insist on. They disdain the use of any other word. What logical man would want to advertise his being gay by “marrying” his sex partner? There's a reason why many gays are “in the closet,” and “getting married” to a member of their own sex destroys that. There's no reason to push these ideas, but that's what liberals DO, mess with our long-held beliefs and practices, whether we like it or not. If we don't like it, they just make a law and FORCE us to like it. It's not about being gay or “identifying” as the opposite sex, it's about the POWER to force people to do their bidding. And that's why I object, in both cases. I have nothing against two men or two women creating a binding union SIMILAR to marriage. But I do object to them destroying the meaning of the WORD “marriage” by using it to describe those unions. (The Blaze)

'They're Out of Step"

Bloomberg's suckers, "Everytown Against Guns (or some such) says, "The NRA and President Trump are 'out of step" with the American people." Oh, yeah? How then, did Trump win the presidency against all the predictions about what the American people thought? And why does the NRA have MILLIONS of members who are concerned about their RIGHT to own and use a gun for self defense? Why do the anti-gun fools LOSE just about every time they try something? I think it's "Everytown" and all the other anti-gin fools that are "out of step," and they aren't intelligent enough to realize it. They got "bent out of shape" about the NRA being included in a presidential strategy meeting at the White House the other day--why? It they're so "out of step," such a meeting wouldn't make much difference, would it? (Guns)

Gun Grabber's Fake News

You'd think he writers at Politico would know the difference between the Social Security gun grab and background checks, wouldn't you? Apparent;y not. After Congress repealed Obama's "gun grab" of seniors who asked others to handle their finances, the writers at Politico reported, with a straight face, that Congress had "repealed the background check law." I don't know if this is an attempt at "fake news" or just plain incompetence, but it is indicative of their bias. They BELIEVE that Congress repealed gun buyer's background checks, and so, apparently, do their editors. They either believe it, or they just weren't doing their job. There's a third possibility: they enthusiastically SUPPORTED this lie. I don't know which it is, but the story us (among others) a signal to watch them closely. (Breitbart)

Watching the Same Speech?

I find it hard to believe the Democrats and Trump supporters heard the same speech as Trump laid out his plans for at least the next four years. His supporters said it was a triumph, and the best speech of its kind they had ever heard. Democrats saw something entirely different. Nancy Peelosi said it was a “bait and switch” speech. Other Democrats said it was a “disjointed” speech and meant nothing. Which is it? I know, It was an excellent speech. Why? Because you can always depend on the Democrats to disparage ANYTHING Trump says. If he said, “The sky is blue,” they'd say it's green, and Trump was trying to fool us. These fools haven't a clue as to how they're alienating America, even their former staunchest supporters—except for the “dyed-in-the-wool true believers.” They're becoming a laughingstock. Good material for “Saturday Night Live.” Except I know they'd never use it. (Just common sense)