Obama and his accomplices are constantly working to make new anti-gun
laws. But my question is, why don't they enforce the ones already on
the books? Laws against criminals being in possession of guns are
already on the books. They can mean an extra ten years, ABOVE the
sentence for the other crimes of which they are accused. But they are
ROUTINELY “waived” in return for “confessions” to other,
lesser crimes. And then, Obama has the perpetrators RELEASED after
serving only 40% of their sentences, saying they are “non-violent
offenders.” In the case of Richard Reid, a “two-time loser” who
was in possession of TWO guns when arrested for selling drugs, maybe
he IS a “non-violent offender.” But why did he HAVE those guns
while he sold his drugs? Maybe he just hasn't been caught in a
violent crime yet. Or maybe he “has people” for that, who weren't
caught. (Daily Caller)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment