Keeping Carrir Here

t was one of Trump's more specific promises during the election: to keep Carrier Company in the United States. And he has done it. At least halfway. They were going to "outsource" 2,000 jobs to Mexico, and now that number is reduced to 1,000. Democrats said it couldn't be done, that Obama was already working on it, and was almost at an agreement (which is the usual Obama taking credit for somebody else's achievement). They said "bullying" them into staying was the work of a DICTATOR. That a president couldn't "bully" a corporation like that, which is why Obama wasn't able to do it. But Trump DID IT. That's undeniable. He didn't keep them ALL here (yet), but I'm sure he's working on that. (Daily Caller)

Criminals Steal Their Guns

Surprise, surprise! Criminals don't go to a gun store and BUY a gun. They STEAL them, or find someone in a back alley somewhere and buy one out of the trunk of his car. This is a BIG STORY in Columbia, MO. Gun store owners have noticed a significant INCREASE in the number of gun owners calling to find out the serial numbers of the guns they purchased, which tells them the gun was stolen, and the owner needed that number for the cops. They say they used to get one or two such calls a month, but now are getting them at the rate of one or two a DAY. The cops say it's hard to say how many guns are stolen because they put those numbers in with stolen laptops, jewelry, and all other property thefts. Which is a damned fool thing to do, since it makes it impossible to know that gun thefts are becoming a major problem. (ABC 17 News)

Bobody Bothers

Thousands of people in the Washington State try to buy guns, even when they KNOW they're not allowed to do so, by having committed certain crimes in the past. The cops really ought to follow up on those people, not just because TRYING to buy a gun, for them, is a violation of state AND federal law, but because after being denied the purchase legally, their next move is to find an ILLEGAL gun dealer in an alley somewhere, who sells guns out of the trunk of his car, never bothering to ask if the buyer is ALLOWED to buy a gun. He doesn't care. All he cares about is the money. A local sheriff says he doesn't have the manpower to enforce that law. Well, he needs to do something about that, rather than make excuses for not doing his job. The very VOLUME of people attempting to buy guns when they KNOW it's illegal tells us that is a MAJOR problem. (King 5 News)

No Guns, No Killing

That's what the damned fools making out current crop of "gun laws" say, confidently. They "know not what they do." They disarm honest, law-abiding people and make them "easy targets" for criminals who want what's theirs, and are willing to kill them to get it. Or Islamic terrorists who see a "target-rich environment" of people who will not "convert" to their silly "religion." It is said that Islam is the fastest-growing religion in the world, and why not? With people threatening other people with DEATH for not "converting." I'd bet that most, if not ALL of those who do "convert" are Muslim in name only, and do not feel it in their hearts. They only "convert" to stay alive. It's easy to have a "fast-growing :"religion" if you offer people DEATH for not "converting." Killing predated guns by thousands of years. There were no guns on Earth when Cain killed Abel. And hundreds of years ago when people commonly killed other people with swords. (Just common sense)

It Happened Again

The anti-gun fools keep saying that people with legally-carried guns can never do anything to stop crimes from occurring, in spite of regular evidence that they do, on a regular basis. Just yesterday I wrote about a "concealed carrier" who rescued a cop, who was being beaten, maybe to death, at the end of a chase, by shooting the attacker. And today, I'm writing about a "concealed carrier" who saw a man stabbing TWO people at an apartment building, got the drop on the stabber, and held him for the cops. What's it going to be tomorrow (or even later today)? Somebody shooting a liquor store robber? Or an old man killing a burglar in his home because the burglar was attacking him, or his wife? It happens, all the time. The anti-gun fools deny it--and they're LYING. (The Courier)

Concentrating On Ammo

They're so obvious, it's crazy. The anti-gun fools can't just ban guns, so they want to make the ones we do have USELESS. That might be good, in a way, because that's pne of the only things in their fool laws that MIGHT effect people who have ILLEGAL guns, too. Except that it's so easy to get bullets ILLEGALLY. Requiring TWO forms of identification before people can buy bullets only creates yet another illicit market, this time for bullets. Criminals LOVE it. Those fools in New Jersey's hierarchy are making them a LOT of money with their fool laws. This hasn't happened in NJ yet. It's only a "recommendation" of a "commission." But you can expect those damned fool lawmakers to "jump on it" with a passion--the liberal ones, anyway. One good thing about Republicans: they tend more toward a bit more intelligence--sometimes. Maybe one day they'll find a way to do something REAL. Maybe. (Breitbart)

Gotta Blame Somebody!

Carol Anderson, that fool "professor" who blames "white rage" for Trump's victory isn't all there. I can tell by looking into her eyes in that picture from TV. Her eyes are the eyes of HATE for everything white, who thinks EVERYTHING bad is the result of "white rage." She shows evidence of her "black rage," which wasn't enough to get Hillary elected, in spite of her crimes, and all her scheming. because most black people saw right through her. Black racists like her attribute EVERYTHING to "white rage." Rage that doesn't exist. Yes, there was a lot of "rage" involved in getting Trump elected.

But it's NOT "white rage," it's HUMAN BEING RAGE. Americans (black, white, Hispanic, or anything else) are tired of being crapped on by their politicians, and racism has NOTHING to do with it. And Democrats have been doing it for more than 50 years. This racist fool is clinging to the phony racism PROMOTED by Obama and using it to excuse the REAL reason Democrats lost, BIG. They just went too far. That's the long and short of it, and this fool can't see that, or REFUSES to see it. And these are the kinds of fools who pretend to teach our impressionable children. No wonder they come home from college with such stupid ideas! (Patriot Tribune)

Again Chicago!

It seems like I'm always writing about Chicago. With all their "so tight" gun laws, there shouldn't be anything to write about for a pro-gun blog, except to extol the success of those laws. IF their gun laws worked. They don't, but the liberals running that city will not recognize that fact. They won't even listen when you say it. Again, notwithstanding their tight gun laws, 4,000 people have been gunshot victims in Chicago, in just ONE year (2016). If that fact doesn't tell them anything, they're STUPID! The mayor there used to be Obama's chief of staff, which should tell you a lot about him--AND Obama. Meanwhile, thousands of people are being shot and hundreds dying every year in this "tight gun law" city. Likewise, in every other city run by gun-hating (except for themselves) liberals, just maybe not quite so much. I, and many other people keep calling their attention to this fact, but they ignore us, which gets more and more people killed, while they criticize us for trying to bring reason and logic to the argument. (Breitbart)

Deluded Gun-Grabbers

There's a new "study" out, "affirming" that anti-gun laws WORK, in spite of indisputable evidence that they DON'T. These "findings," were put out by JAMA Internal Medicine, an agency that knows NOTHING about guns, or gun control, except what they've been told by anti-gun fools, just as if those "studies" actually meant something other than the pipe dreams of fools. Just one city (Chicago) among many (LA, NYC, and many others) with TIGHT gun laws and exceedingly high gun death rates DISPROVES this "research," but they ignore that in their efforts to help the anti-gun fools DISARM the populace. They decry Congress essentially PROHIBITING research into "gun violence" by medical sources, even though "gun violence" is NOT a "medical issue." Those who claim it is are self-deluded. They say, "Stricter gun laws are associated with fewer gun deaths," which is a patent LIE. They also refer to such laws as Florida's "stand your ground law" as producing more homicides--which ALSO is a lie. Their conclusion? That eliminating all guns will mean no more murders. Talk about self-delusion! These people just can't face reality, just as those fools who promote global warming can't. (Popular Science)

Obama's "Legacy"

Obama is worried about "his legacy." But Obama doesn't have a legacy. At least, not one to which he will admit, anyway. His is a legacy of major destruction to this country's prestige, as well as causing it to fall into a recession to which he will NEVER admit. He leaves a real legacy of 90 million unemployed who have been without jobs for so long they have given up on EVER finding work again, and have left the work force to live at the government's expense--which was his plan, all along. People dependent on the government for their "daily bread" are easier to control. His legacy is DESTROYING the medical profession with Obamacare, so he can foist a "single-payer" health care system on us, with him in charge.

His is a legacy of death and destruction, and loss of the prestige this country once enjoyed. His legacy is a rise of racism, when it was almost ENDED before he came. And the rise of BLACK racism against whites that is ever more vicious than ANYTHING whites EVER did against blacks in the past. Mostly because it is "Obama created," after he told us electing him would forever END racism in this country. He and his sycophants have "whipped up" racism where it didn't exist, and invented new forms of racism by attributing racism to things that were NOT racism, at all. History will remember Barack Obama as the WORST president in the history of America. A man who came close to DESTROYING this country by spending more money than ALL presidents before him, PUT TOGETHER, and by refusing to name an enemy and allowing him to grow strong, while refusing to effectively fight him. (Just common sense)

Another Good Reason

There are many good reasons to allow law-abiding people to be armed in self defense. There is the obvious: to be able to defend themselves against the myriad of ILLEGAL guns out there, in the hands of thugs and killers, who are willing to KILL people to be able to take what they have worked for, and EARNED. That's one, and probably the most important one. Then there is the possibility that the government, itself decided to victimize people. They need to know they are just as easily stopped by a bullet as is anybody else. Hunting? Yes, but that is the least important reason. Another reason is to help defend the law enforcement officers when they get in trouble trying to apprehend a criminal, who "gets the drop on them." That's what happened in this case: An officer in Estero, FL, was pursuing a man, who jumped out of his car and started beating the hell out of the cop, who was alone. A bystander, who was a licensed "concealed carrier," ordered him to stop, and when he did not, the bystander shot him three times, killing him. There's no telling what would have became of that officer, had that bystander not taken action. That officer might have been beaten to death. People in the vicinity of such occurrences with concealed guns can be very helpful to the cops when they get into a bad situation. Maybe even life or death. (LEO Affairs)

Trump Declares War!

War on anti-gun fools who want to "dice up" the Second Amendment. I'm sure he's not the first president who has had a concealed carry permit, but he's certainly the first one in my memory who proudly declared it--and my memory goes back a long way. He has served notice that he isn't going to allow them to "dice up" the Second Amendment the way they've been trying to do for a long time. There's even a movement afoot to REPEAL the Second Amendment. Which is DOOMED if it ever reaches his desk, because he will veto it, if necessary. Trump is definitely the best friend people who wish to retain their constitutionally guaranteed right to self defense, as well as to own and carry the tool to do it, a gun, ever had in the White House. He knows would-be dictators are the only ones who want to disarm the populace, and he certainly is not that! No matter what liberal Democrats say. He believes the government has NO BUSINESS deciding whether or not a citizen can own and carry a gun for self defense. Hitler did it; Stalin did it; and other dictators did it, and you know the result if you've been paying attention. (Breitbart)

A Lot to Repeal

Trump has a big job ahead of him, just repealing all the stupid laws Obama managed to get made before he got saddled with a Republican Congress and had to resort to the ILLEGAL use of executive orders, which he "enforced" LIKE laws. One of those silly laws is the one that made ALL "school zones" gun-free zones. That single law is responsible for ALL the school children who have been killed and injured by mass shooters, who KNEW there probably wouldn't be anybody there with their own guns, and able to oppose him. I say, "him," because, so far, ALL mass shooters have been male. So don't give me a lot of crap about ignoring women. I know, I know: those laws MAY have been made before Obama. But they were made by the same kind of people Obama is. Point is, it may be a full-time job JUST to get stupid liberal laws repealed. (Bullets First)

Total Stupidity

That's what you get when you elect liberals to office. Stupid liberals are in the minority, you say? Then why is it that, where liberals "rule," you have tight gun laws, combined with high gun crime rates? And politicians who will not listen to those who tell them their laws are USELESS, with the proof staring them in the face? Then you have the politicians who take it way too far. Like the ones in Baltimore who want to ban TOY guns. Of course, toy guns aren't protected in the Constitution, so they can get away with that stupidity. But what danger are TOY guns? That's easy. Letting little children have toy guns is against their policy of keeping ALL knowledge about guns away from children. They think that's how you keep kids from killing themselves and others through ignorance and curiosity. As long as we (not me) keep electing these ignoramuses, we'll get such stupid laws, and be forced to OBEY them, if we're law-abiding people, that is. (Fox News)

"Repeal The Second"

"Voters in Oak Park, IL township voted to repeal the Second Amendment." Sounds ominous, doesn't it? But not so ominous when you consider it only took 15 signatures to get it on their ballots. A professor at UIC is all "shook up" that 17 people were killed by guns in Chicago in the last 2 weeks, and says "that has to end!" What he doesn't seem to notice is that we already have more than enough gun laws in Chicago, and they don't seem to have any effect, because the people who are the problem don't OBEY laws. so what the hell good would repealing the Second Amendment DO? It would only create a nation of DEFENSELESS law-abiding citizens who will be even MORE at the mercy of the ILLEGAL gun owners. Fortunately, this measure is not in any danger of becoming law. (Bearing Arms)

It's A National Travesty!

"It is a national travesty. It is funded and organized by the likes of George Soros and the Democratic Machine. It is condoned by the Obama Administration: the mass-murder of our law enforcement officers at the hands of thugs who receive cover and praise from the Left." And those thugs are ready and willing to kill as many cops as they can, mostly from ambush. Sometimes calling in phony disturbance calls that don't forewarn the cops it might be a trap. Sometimes just walking up to their cars and shooting them in the ear. And they keep saying that cops "hunt black men for sport" to justify their killings. Sixty cops have been MURDERED in the United States, and the liberals praise the thugs and "knock" the cops. Obama and his friends are DIRECTLY responsible for all these deaths, and the many more to come, as stupid people "hunt cops for sport," as advised by "Black Lives Matter." What we need is a "Blue Lives Matter" organization, not that it will do any good. Or maybe charging BLM spokesmen for "terrorist threats" in their rhetoric. Like the chant, "What do we want? Dead cops! When do we want it? NOW!" (Blabber Buzz)

"NRA In Their Pocket"

The media says the NRA is "in the pocket of the gun makers." What a short-sighted bunch these fools are! They just can't understand the fact that so many people WANT to keep their constitutionally guaranteed right to self defense, and to own and carry the means to that, a gun. They know their own purposes are questionable, so they think those of the NRA are, too. They're very disappointed that Trump won the election, because that signals that their anti-gun efforts re DOOMED, for the foreseeable future. At least for four years, and probably for eight. And if Trump appoints the right people to the Supreme Court, for longer than that. They can't admit the actions of the pro-gun people are admirable. They have to demonize them and run them down, so they can feel good about themselves. But their mission is WRONG, and so they will be defeated. (Police One)

"Target-Rich Environment"

I predicted it recently. Waffle House restaurants are going to be "targeted" by armed robbers because they think they have a better chance of not finding honest people there with their own guns, well able to stop them. Well, in Georgia, a "serial robber" has proved me right by robbing SEVERAL Waffle Houses. The cops say they want to capture this guy before he finds an "armed customer." They assume it will be the CUSTOMER who gets shot. I think they're very wrong. It is the ROBBER who needs to watch out, because not ALL law-abiding people obey STUPID laws. "Gun-free zone" or not, he IS going to eventually run into somebody with his (or her) own gun, and he is going to "go down." The more Waffle Houses he robs, the more apt he is to find an ARMED customer. And when he does, it is not the CUSTOMER who will "go down," it is HIM. (WPXI Channel 2)

Happy Thanksgiving, Folks!

We have a lot to be thankful for this day. We have been spared the hardship of a Hillary Clinton administration. We have elected a man who can return this country to its rightful prominence and respect in the world. Whether he does, or not, remains to be seen. But we have a chance. That is, if all Hillary's chicanery does not succeed. She acts like she's above it all, but I'd bet she's behind all the silly "demonstrations," using the same people that have been seen at other "demonstrations," all over the country, ostensibly beginning with the killing of that giant thug who tried to kill a policeman in Ferguson, MO. Today is a day of thanksgiving, and family. I have a family too, believe it or not, and I intend to spend it with them. But I'll be back tomorrow.

Total Ignorance

Obama has nearly destroyed the Democrat Party by overreaching. He has spent a lot of the last 8 years violating the Constitution and using "executive orders" as if they were laws, thereby "bypassing Congress"--which ought to get him a prison cell, or at least impeachment and FIRING. His foreign policy is a DISASTER that has lost us the respect of the world. He has released THOUSANDS of violent criminals from prison, as well as as many Islamic terrorists, who have PROMISED to kill as many of us as they can. Democrats have lost THOUSANDS of seats in legislatures all over the country, and many governorships, not to mention losing their majority in the Congress in the last election, then seeing that loss INCREASED in this one, while LOSING a "fixed election" they thought would be a "shoo-in" for Hillary Clinton. The Democrat Party is in shambles. It doesn't know what to do to regain its former eminence. And it won't for a long time--if ever. Until somnolent Republicans return to their own ignorance and stop voting again, as they have in the past, which is why Democrats have won so much in the last half century--until now. Obama is either one of the most IGNORANT presidents we have ever had, or he just doesn't care. Trump got more votes than ANY Republican, EVER, in the past. The linked cartoon tells the tale without a word being said. (Gary Varvel)

Nationwide Concealed Carry

Boy, Trump really knows how to make liberals and anti-gun fool "toss their cookies!." I can just hear the sound of toilets flushing all over liberal-land as liberals show their distress at Trump supporting a NATIONAL concealed carry law. I can hear liberal "heads exploding like popcorn kernels" (I stole that from PJ Media. It was too good not to). In a position paper published on his web sire recently, he called for the elimination of gun and magazine bans, calling them "a total failure." He is the first major office holder I've seen who not only recognizes the truth, he isn't afraid to SAY it, and to ACT on it! With all the anti-gun fools out there, many of them with the ability to make themselves heard, that takes real GUTS! "Law-abiding people should be allowed to own the firearm of their choice. The government has no business dictating what types of firearms good, honest people are allowed to own," Trump wrote. It won't take long for the anti-gun fools to crap on him over this, because the very idea of honest people being able to defend themselves against the armed thugs who already have ILLEGAL guns, makes them barf all over the place. But with the PRESIDENT on our side, how can we lose? But don't get too cocky. There are still lots of stupid people out there who believe the government SHOULD "control guns" that we should never let our guard down. (PJ Media)

One More Reason

Why we should reject "gun control." There's a race war coming, promoted by Barack Hussein Obama. It doesn't matter that Obama will soon be a part of our history. He "planted the seed" when he SUPPORTED ideas like that promoted by "Black Lives Matter" and the idea that cops shoot and kill black males in undue numbers. Every time a cop shoots a "bad guy," it doesn't matter that the "bad guy" was shooting at him, or preparing to shoot at him. They paint it as an UNNECESSARY killing of one more black man. And putting a target on the backs of every cop only makes it worse. They talk about the higher numbers of black men killed and injured by cops in "minority" areas, completely ignoring the unalterable fact that those "minority" (black) areas are where the most CRIME occurs. Therefore, it's not unexpected that more black men will be shot in those areas. They're now OPENLY promoting gun violence, and getting away with it, while Obama still "holds the reins of power." One anti-Trump protester actually said, on CNN, one of the most liberal news sites, that "violence and death" was the means to effect political change. For my part, that demonstrator may be right, but such violence and death should be visited upon people like her, not law-abiding citizens. (Mediaite)

They Just Never Learn

Liberals (Democrats) were "spanked" in the presidential election, and so was gun control. But did Democrats notice? Not a chance. They've "pledged" to renew their efforts to take the guns away from honest, law-abiding people to make them DEFENSELESS against the crooks carrying ILLEGAL guns out there, and voted in anti-gun fool Chuckie Schumer to replace Crappy Harry Reid as minority leader in the Senate, guaranteeing anti-gun efforts will continue, in spite of Donald Trump's promise to "respect the Second Amendment." They plan to also promote the usual giveaways and higher taxes. Things the people rejected in this, and two previous elections. And they're having meetings all over the place to "find out what went wrong," when the answer is so obvious: the American people just got tired of being screwed over and decided to, as Trump put it, "clean out the swamp in DC and elsewhere." They'll never learn, and thus, beginning two elections ago, their party will dwindle until it goes the way of the Whigs. (America's First Freedom)

It Doesn't Work. Period!

Gun control. It is inherently a failed effort. Its proponents think they can "control guns" by making laws against them. They can't. Experience shows that as soon as they ban a certain gun, it turns up in increasing numbers on the black market. Banning a certain kind of gun only creates a bigger illicit market in them. Gun laws only apply to people who OBEY laws, and those people are not the problem.

The people who ARE the problem are the criminals. And they don't obey laws. ANY laws. If their entire being is devoted to breaking the law, why would anybody expect them to obey a law that says they can't be armed? You can't. What they do is take advantage of the short-sighted laws against guns, that keep their intended victims unarmed and DEFENSELESS. Anti-gun fools look on in horror at the very THOUGHT of a society where all law-abiding people have the right to be armed in self defense.

That shows a certain IGNORANCE of human nature. As Robert Heinlein said, "An armed society is a polite society." What's more, an armed society is a safer society, since they have the means to fend off the "bad guys. All current efforts to"control guns" are futile, as we can see by the fact that where the gun laws are the tightest, gun crime is the worst. Chicago is the best example of that. Australia is another. They have an almost complete gun ban there, and gun crime has INCREASED 300% since.

Maybe one day the anti-gun fools will wake up and realize that their efforts only make things worse, and change their direction. But I'm not holding my breath until they do, because I don't like turning blue. (Bearing Arms)

Anti-Gun Attorney General

The (former) attorney general of Pennsylvania, who is an avid anti-gun fool, a petty, vindictive sort who violated the law on a regular basis, promised to "end corruption" in Pennsylvania. And I guess she did, in a "round-about way." She was convicted on many counts of abusing her power and faces maybe 28 years in prison (though she'll probably get less). She traded political favors for legal protection. But it wasn't her anti-gun activities that got her in trouble. It was her complete disdain for the limitations on her power. At one point she managed to stop an investigation into her activities, but it was taken up by local prosecutors, and resulted in many convictions for corruption, including hers. She lost her law license, as well as her job. But it's likely she won't need either while she's in prison, just as Bill Clinton didn't need his after being impeached, since he made more money by braying. Maybe the FBI should take a look at this woman, and apply the same rules to Hillary Clinton, now that she has been eliminated from the presidential race. But I doubt they will. Notice this former AG is a Democrat. So you won't hear much about this in the liberal media. (Bullets First)

A Special Kind of Stupid

That's the best way to describe the "Black Lives Matter" movement, and the "war on cops." BLM people go around chanting, "What do we want? Dead cops! When do we want it? NOW!" And that IS a "special kind of stupid." Think about it. What would we do if suddenly there were no cops? What would THEY do if suddenly there were no cops? We (and they) would descend into anarchy. They might think that would be a good thing, because then there'd be nobody to interfere with their ability to victimize us. But that would work both ways. If there were no cops, we would be FORCED to do the job the cops USED TO DO, ourselves. There would be no way to keep us from getting our own guns, which would make it harder for them to victimize us. People who ordinarily would obey their silly gun laws would now ignore what was left of them and get their guns the same way the criminals do. Then they would soon be killing the "bad guys" all over the place when they came to victimize them.

They would soon be stealing from each other, with no cops around to stop them. They already do that, which is why so many black males get shot to death by other black males. They say the cops are "uniformly racist," which ignores two things: One, the MAJORITY of black males killed by cops are killed by BLACK cops; and, two, more WHITE men are killed by cops than black men.And most of these killings are "righteous," putting the LIE to their spoutings of BS.These are stats they don't want to know about. All they're interested in is making life hard for the cops, not thinking about the results, One of which is that cops killing people will only INCREASE, as cops, knowing they have a target on their backs, are quicker to shoot. They are CREATING the very thing they SAY they oppose. That takes a very special kind of stupid. (Just Common sense) This article appeared in iPatriot.

Frightened Liberals

It doesn't take mudh to frighten liberal "snowflakes" and send them crying to their "safe places." Awww....poor babies! Some wag brought a "nerf gun" to a polling place in Sarasota, FL, and some of the liberals there (probably voting for Hillary) "lost their minds" and called the sheriff. The sheriff thought the man had a real "automatic weapon" and responded quickly. But when they got there, they found out the truth. Some liberals can't tell the difference between a TOY gun and a real one (even with the bright orange tip in the barrel), and were frightened. So the cops spoke to the man, saying the "gun" might cause more such calls, and suggested he leave it in his car. That's all they did, then they left, to the anger of the liberals who made the call. The man walked off, and did not return. (Herald-Tribune)

They Were Wrong

The pundits were wrong, right along, on Donald Trump. When he announced his candidacy for the presidency, they ridiculed him. They said he couldn't win a single primary. Then he started winning them in wholesale numbers. Then they said, "Okay, he won a few primaries, but he will never get the nomination." Then he continued winning primaries, right and left. and got the nomination by almost complete obliteration of 16 candidates. So they said, "Sure, he did get the nomination. But he can't win the general election. It's impossible." Now he has won the general election by a huge majority. Will they continue to be wrong about him as he goes about his duties as the elected president of the United States? Probably, Most of the pundits don't recognize their fallibility. They just ignore it and continue to make wrong predictions. Some of the same people said the same things about Ronald Reagan, and he won two elections by a landslide, after getting rid of many of the bad things liberals had done before. (Just common sense)

Keep Democrats Out!

One of the most successful CONS the Democrats use when they LOSE elections is to DEMAND "cooperation." They want to be allowed "in" on as many decisions as possible so they can UNDERMINE what the Republicans do. Do NOT "cooperate" with Democrats, in ANYTHING. If you do, they will use that as a "springboard" to gain more power for themselves in a Republican administration. Don't listen to their WHINING when you exclude them. That's how they manage to retain much of the power they LOST during the election. They have NOTHING to offer a Republican administration. They might as well change their name to "The Socialist Party of America," because that's what they are. They hid it well until Bernie Sanders "let the cat out of the bag" by ADMITTING he was a "dedicated socialist" when he ran against Hillary. He said she wasn't "socialist enough,"

while she claimed she wasn't socialist, at all.

 But you have only to look at what she espouses to see the socialism in her thinking: FREE college tuition; FREE socialized medicine; more and more people on food stamps, getting FREE food; FREE this; FREE that. Socialists never talk about who must PAY for all this "free stuff." But it is YOU if you work and earn your way in life. They TAKE an ever increasing PART of what you EARN through taxes, and GIVE it away through all kinds of disguised and non-disguised WELFARE, making it harder and harder for people who REALLY need it to get any help, at all. People who CAN'T work have their assistance reduced because there is little left after supporting the able-bodied people collecting welfare. The more Democrats there are in positions of power, the more of this that occurs. So keep these people OUT! It's "legal THEFT." (Just common sense)

Injecting Racism

Communist Van Jones is angry. He says Trump's election is a "whitelash against a black president." Leave it to such as him to inject racism into a good thing. Which tells me HE is the racist in this plot. Some black people have been working HARD to CREATE black against WHITE racism in this country, and that works to Jones' advantage in his quest to bring communism to America. Liberals of all stripes regularly use racism to advance their agenda. Racism that does not exist, and never has, to the extent they insist upon. Yes, there are a few malcontents who ARE racist, But they are an increasing minority and their numbers are dwindling rapidly. Obama INCREASED the small amount of remaining racism by PREFERRING to be black, when it suited him (he's as much white as he is black). ANYBODY who opposed him, on ANYTHING, was called a racist. And that continues, with people like Jones. Hopefully, we can overcome that during the Trump years. (The Blaze)

A Revolution Was Won

Nov.8th, America won an election. While doing so, we won a revolution, as well. We showed the liberals that you can only push Americans so far, then we'll "rise up" and "slap you down." That's what happened to Hillary and Obama last night. America knew we were heading in the wrong direction, and they did what they had to do to reverse course. The last revolution was fought over the right of the states to be independent of the DICTATES of the federal government. The unfortunate part was that freedom to be independent involved keeping a PEOPLE in slavery, which is why they lost. There is no such negativity in this revolution. This time, we revolted simply to regain the freedoms the liberals were taking away, little by little, with increasing regularity. We served notice on the liberals that we would no longer stand for their political atrocities. The election of Donald Trump served that notice, and he has a lot of work to do to reverse the things they already did. (Just common sense)

"The Socialist States of America"

If a Democrat ever asked me what is the basic theme of the Democrat Party, I would tell them simply, "It's SOCIALISM, dummy!" I say a Democrat asked me because it's the only bunch, as a group, who don't know that SOCIALISM is the basic theme preached by Democrats. They'll deny it to their dying day, but you merely have to look at what they promote to see the SOCIALISM that runs through it. Free health care, free college, free this, free that. Socialism is a simple philosophy that is revealed by their very motto: "FROM each according to his ABILITY, and TO each according to his NEED." Making NEED a DEMAND on the EARNINGS of the producers of new wealth in a society. Socialists produce NO new wealth. They TAKE it from those who do. It is a philosophy of government THEFT from those capable and willing to EARN their own way, for the benefit of those who, for one reason or the other, do NOT earn their own way. Those who want to live at the expense of others, without the need to WORK for it. And there are many such people in America. Fortunately, for us, not enough to elect Hillary Clinton, a DEDICATED socialist, to the White House. They DID elect Barack Obama, an equally dedicated socialist AND a Muslim terrorist sympathizer. But they got enough of his socialism when presented with his "clone," Hillary Clinton. (CNBC)

We Should Be Pleased

We have elected a man as president who has PROMISED to support our right to own and use the means to self protection, a gun. He has announced who will be in his “gun rights coalition.” Most of those named are known pro-gun activists. Of course, the anti-gun fool crowd will claim they’re just “his supporters,” being rewarded for that support. Not so. They are pro-gun activists, and will act that way in all they do. The long awaited day has come. There WILL continue to be efforts to take away our rights. But no longer will they have presidential support, which is important. Presidential support is a powerful incentive for many people. Take it away, and the effort weakens. This is what will happen under Trump. But don't get overconfident. The anti-gun fools will never give up, so keep your guard up. (Independent Journal Review)

"Self Defense Is Illegal"

That’s what the National Park Service says, in its parks. Carrying a gun is not illegal. It is a constitutional right, and state law allows it. But they have made “discharging a firearm” for self defense, or any other reason ILLEGAL. As usual, they can’t just BAN guns altogether, so they make laws and rules that make the guns you have USELESS. If a bear attacks you, what are you to do? Just let him eat you? They say “bear spray” will do it, and MAYBE it will—if you have any handy, and if that bear is not enraged. But, failing that, you’ll just have to let the bear kill you, I guess. For my part, I’d rather face legal action by the Park Service, rather than allow myself to be killed by a bear. If they don’t like that, nasty break! If the only way to stay alive is to break the law, guess what I’ll do. (Bullets First)

Racists Calling Others Racist

The media are still calling Trump and his people racist. with no basis in fact, of course. Meanwhile, they are the real racists in the picture. Outside of the black against white racism that is rising fast, under the impetus of presidential approval and the influence of "Black Lives Matter. Media Research Center (MRC) says this about them: "This is why Americans are sick of you, and it’s why your ratings are in the toilet. They’re sick of left-wing journalists pointing their almighty finger at conservatives whenever they scratch their nose wrong, while totally ignoring liberals who spew all kinds of filthy, nasty mess." This is the very reason I STARTED my blogs. To help, in a small way, to "get around" the media embargo on the truth, and help get the truth out there. In the beginning, I thought the media covering up the "bad stuff" about liberals was only a few misguided souls. Now I know it is systemic. It is EXPECTED by those running things that their reporters will continue to HIDE the bad things liberals (Democrats) do, and highlight everything they think is bad the conservatives do. These people have lost the RIGHT to call others racist, through their OWN racism. (MRC TV)

Passed a Background Check

The guy who almost killed former Rep. Gabby Giffords PASSED a background check when he bought hs gun, Did that do her any good when his bullet invaded her brain? Not a bit. She was sorely wounded, and almost died. Now she’s campaigning in support of the SAME background check her assailant passed, in Nevada. I guess her brain was “scrambled” more than we thought by that bullet, if she thinks that background check, or any other, will do any good to keep guns out of the hands of such people. The guy obviously had not committed a crime before he tried to kill her, so he didn’t have any trouble passing a background check. Which is what I’ve been saying for years. Background checks only help the cops IDENTIFY an assailant, by tracing his background check AFTER the crime. “Gun-free zones” likewise do NOTHING to stop CRIMINALS, who don’t OBEY laws, from bringing their guns in. It only stops law-abiding people from doing so, making them DEFENSELESS. Which is the fatal flaw in all their anti-gun laws. (Breitbart)

Revealing His Ignorance

Gabby Giffords’ husband, former astronaut Mark Kelly, says “Those gun nuts wouldn’t stand a chance against an active shooter.” Which reveals his abysmal IGNORANCE. Those “gun nuts,” as he calls them. Regularly DO prevail against “active shooters” when confronted with one. Unarmed people DON’T, like that unarmed pizza joint owner who was shot to death recently. Kelly reveals the disdain with which he, and all anti-gun FOOLS think, concerning those who fight against people like him to keep their CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT to own and use the means of self defense, a gun. Yes, if they’re untrained, he might be right. But the NRA (which he hates with a passion) TEACHES them proper gun handling and safety. And the holders of illegal guns get NO such training. They just get their guns, from another crook, out of his car trunk, in an alley, somewhere. HE is the one who would have “no chance” against one of the “gun nuts.” (Politico)

Surprise, Surprise!

The head of the Los Angeles office of the Council on Islamic American Relations (CAIR), an organization with KNOWN DIRECT connections with Islamic terrorism, Tweeted out a sentence that, translated, says, "The people wants to bring down the regime." Aside from the bad English, it's obvious that he didn't expect English speaking people to find out what he said. Which means he sees the SMALL NUMBER of PAID fools demonstrating as representing "the people," which they do NOT. Now we KNOW that the Islamic terrorists, of which this organization is an integral part, want to "overthrow" this regime. What we need to do is kick this organization, and all those supporting it, OUT. They'll call that "racism," of course. That's one of their best known scams. But getting rid of saboteurs is just COMMON SENSE. (MRC TV)

Gun Frightens Libral Fools!

A woman got all shook up when a man wearing an openly carried gun tried to give her a Trump leaflet and when she refused it, he asked her, “Who are you going to vote for, Crooked Hillary?” Which sorely frightened her. Like he was going to draw that gun and shoot her for not voting the way he thought she should. Virginia is an “open carry state,” so he was fully within his rights. They asked him to cover the gun, which he readily did (he also had a concealed carry permit), and then everything was “okay.” He stayed the requisite 40 feet from the polling place, so that was okay, too. Nobody could see that “wascally gun,” so nobody was frightened, any more. What a bunch of WIMPS those liberals (Democrats) are! Just the SIGHT of a gun scares the hell out of them, and they go “crying to mommy!”

The man did nothing any political operative would not do. He was “nice” to everybody, according to reports. But he had a gun! So he frightened people, just standing there. Sheesh If this is the kind of place America has come to, I don’t want to be here, any more. But there’s nowhere better to go. So I’m stuck. They make a “big thing” about the difference between this and the big black men carrying nightsticks and wearing cop-like uniforms at a polling place last election. But those men weren’t 40 feet away. They were right in the doorway. You had to walk around them to get inside. They say the difference is this man was WHITE, injecting race into it, as usual (that’s what liberals DO!). But those black men were violating the “distance law,” and WERE intimidating people. This guy was not. Black or white, he was in the right, law-wise. (Huffington Post)

Banning Bullets

If there were no bullets, guns would be useless—right? The anti-gun fools can’t just BAN guns, because of the Constitution. But the Constitution says nothing about bullets, so after years of trying (since before the ink dried on the Constitution), they haven’t been able to enact a ban on guns for law-abiding people. So now they want stiffer “controls,” or an outright BAN on bullets. They’ve already started on high-capacity magazines (how they figure that will stop anybody, who has access to many magazines, from killing a bunch of people, I don’t know). The anti-gun fools have people in dimly-lighted rooms, constantly racking their tiny brains to find ways to disarm the American population so they can better oppress them, and every once in a while they come up with something that might work—to get guns out of the hands of law-abiding people. But they never think about a way to keep guns out of the hands of CRIMINALS, who don’t OBEY laws, so those law-abiding people remain DEFENSELESS against them. (WBAY 2)

Socialist States of America

If a Democrat ever asked me what is the basic theme of the Democrat Party, I would tell them simply, "It's SOCIALISM, dummy!" I say a Democrat asked me because it's the only bunch, as a group, who don't know that SOCIALISM is the basic theme preached by Democrats. They'll deny it to their dying day, but you merely have to look at what they promote to see the SOCIALISM that runs through it. Free health care, free college, free this, free that. Socialism is a simple philosophy that is revealed by their very motto: "FROM each according to his ABILITY, and TO each according to his NEED." Making NEED a DEMAND on the EARNINGS of the producers of new wealth in a society. Socialists produce NO new wealth. They TAKE it from those who do. It is a philosophy of government THEFT from those capable and willing to EARN their own way, for the benefit of those who, for one reason or the other, do NOT earn their own way. Those who want to live at the expense of others, without the need to WORK for it. And there are many such people in America. Fortunately, for us, not enough to elect Hillary Clinton, a DEDICATED socialist, to the White House. They DID elect Barack Obama, an equally dedicated socialist AND a Muslim terrorist sympathizer. But they got enough of his socialism when presented with his "clone," Hillary Clinton. (CNBC)

Gun Frightens Liberal Fools

A woman got all shook up when a man wearing an openly carried gun tried to give her a Trump leaflet and when she refused it, he asked her, “Who are you going to vote for, Crooked Hillary?” Which sorely frightened her. Like he was going to draw that gun and shoot her for not voting the way he thought she should. Virginia is an “open carry state,” so he was fully within his rights. They asked him to cover the gun, which he readily did (he also had a concealed carry permit and was the required distance from the polling place), and then everything was “okay.” He stayed the requisite 40 feet from the polling place, so that was okay, too. Nobody could see that “wascally gun,” so nobody was frightened, any more. What a bunch of WIMPS those liberals (Democrats) are! Just the SIGHT of a gun scares the hell out of them, and they go “crying to mommy!” The man did nothing any political operative would not do. He was “nice” to everybody, according to reports. But he had a gun! So he frightened people, just standing there. Sheesh If this is what America has come to, I don’t want to be here, any more. But there’s nowhere better to go. So I’m stuck. They make a “big thing” about the difference between this and the big black men carrying nightsticks and wearing cop-like uniforms at a polling place last election. But those men weren’t 40 feet away. They were right in the doorway. You had to walk around them to get inside. They say the difference is this man was WHITE, injecting race into it, as usual (that’s what liberals DO!). But those black men were violating the “distance law,” and WERE intimidating people. This guy was not. Black or white, he was in the right, law-wise. (Huffington Post)

Banning Bullets

If there were no bullets, guns would be useless—right? The anti-gun fools can’t just BAN guns, because of the Constitution. But the Constitution says nothing about bullets, so after years of trying (since before the ink dried on the Constitution), they haven’t been able to enact a ban on guns for law-abiding people. So now they want stiffer “controls,” or an outright BAN on bullets. They’ve already started on high-capacity magazines (how they figure that will stop anybody, who has access to many magazines, from killing a bunch of people, I don’t know). The anti-gun fools have people in dimly-lighted rooms, constantly racking their tiny brains to find ways to disarm the American population so they can better oppress them, and every once in a while they come up with something that might work—to get guns out of the hands of law-abiding people. But they never think about a way to keep guns out of the hands of CRIMINALS, who don’t OBEY laws, so those law-abiding people remain DEFENSELESS against them. (WBAY2)

"Taking Out" Bloomberg, Soros

We took Hillary out, ENDING her political career. In 4, maybe 8 years, she'll be too old to seriously run again for president. And Soros is already too old to be much more trouble in the future. But he has systems set up to do us as much damage as he can in his remaining years, so we need to find a way to "take him out," too. Bloomberg is relatively young, and can still do a LOT of damage, especially to those wanting to retain their natural right to self defense, and to own and use the means to that end, a gun. If they read this, they'll probably accuse me of wanting them killed. That's how they deal with opposition: paint the opposition as black as they can. They'll probably call me a racist for having the temerity to use the word, "black." So now, I'll be not only a potential murderer, but a racist one, too. But I don't want them dead. I want them rendered IMPOTENT to do us any more damage, since these two are the biggest KNOWN enemies of the United States. With all he's done, I don't know why Soros is not in prison, now. That's where this evil monster needs to be. He has already destroyed the economies of FIVE countries, and is working diligently to do the same here. The NRA spent $20 million to "take Hillary out," and is now working to "take them out," so their influence probably will not last much longer, billionaires, or not. (Washington Examiner)

"Keep 'Em Ignornt"

Liberals think the best way to keep kids from getting into the guns in the house and maybe killing themselves or others is to “keep them ignorant” about guns, so they remain curious. That curiosity usually leads to them getting into the guns and “playing with them” as if they were cap guns, having no idea they can KILL. So they do everything they can to HIDE “gun knowledge” from the kids, and that can get them KILLED. So the kids predictably get into the guns in the house (they know where they are) and sometimes shoot each other, not having any idea it’s not a “cap gun.” And they know what cap guns are, don’t they? A Jacksonville, FL mom, who has heard all the ignorant lies from the anti-gun fools was very upset that her school had “taught her children about guns” without her permission. She said, “They’ve undone 7 years of parenting in one year.” This shows the level of IGNORANCE she has, if she thinks keeping her kids IGNORANT about guns is “parenting.” If you’re going to keep your lids alive, you’re going to have to TEACH them about guns, that they can KILL you, and they’re not the same as cap guns. Otherwise, their innate curiosity will “take over” and they (or their friends) might not survive it, It is this level of IGNORANCE that gets kids killed, plus the carelessness with which parents store their guns, not the gun. (Ammoland)

Stupid Crack of the Day

Gabby Giffords must have gotten her brain scrambled good when that jerk shot her in that parking lot. The other day she said, “Background checks are not required of felons.” No kiddin’ Gabby! Maybe that’s because they aren’t supposed to HAVE guns—period. But they always seem to have them when they want to victimize honest, law-abiding people. How do you do a background check on somebody who has an ILLEGAL gun, as most criminals do? So what’s your point, Gabby? You want to make a law REQUIRING felons to get background checks? How do you intend to enforce it? Most felons DO have extensive background checks. They’re called, “records.” Which is why your laws don’t allow them to have guns—which does NOTHING to keep them from HAVING the guns they use to victimize us, while, as law-abiding people, we OBEY your stupid laws, and are DEFENSELESS against those felons because of it.

She even gets Hillary wrong when she tells us she’s stupid enough to vote for her. She calls her a former U. S. Representative. She is NOT, and never has been. She has been a senator. The Democrats bought that for her. She has been Secretary of State, Obama gave that to her to keep her mouth shut. She failed miserably at both. And she has been “First Lady,” for which she did nothing except be married to the fool who was president, and stayed married to him through all his sexcapades, even DEFENDING him by “demonizing” the women he screwed, even the one(s) he RAPED!. I’ve never seen a SANE woman do that. Giffords says current law ALLOWS felons to get guns without background checks. Nothing could be further from the truth! Felons aren’t “ALLOWED” to have guns, PERIOD! So they get them ILLEGALLY, and “skip” the background check. She criticizes Sheriff Arpaio for wanting to enforce the law Obama wants to ignore. Talk about STUPIDITY! (Just common sense)

Anti-Gun Politician Loses

We didn't make a big thing of it when Hillary lost the election, but when she lost, the government lost one of the most virulent anti-gun fools in politics. She supported an "Australian-style gun buyback program," although they, themselves admit it did NOT work. They're decrying the number of ILLEGAL guns in Australia now, although they're planning to "do it again." She says she is "concerned about toddlers killing each other," but had no plans on how to prevent it, except to come as close to banning guns as she could. Mostly by making the guns we have USELESS. She thinks the Supreme Court is "wrong on the Second Amendment." How that is, is in question, since the Court merely supports what is WRITTEN in the Constitution. That CANNOT be wrong. An interesting factoid is that the NRA put money into FIVE pro-gun candidates, and won 4. That should tell you something about who's right. (Washington Free Beacon)

DOJ to FBI: "Stand Down!"

That’s the word given the FBI by an “official” of the Department of Justice (DOJ), according to the Wall Street Journal. When asked, by an assistant director if they were “ordering” the FBI to “back off” on a viable investigation, the DOJ “official” backed off, and said, “No.” But the DOJ has been doing everything it can to derail the investigation, and the FBI has been resisting. There was almost a rebellion IN the FBI over Comey’s announcement that, even though Hillary was guilty of many crimes, he wasn’t going to recommend prosecution because “she didn’t mean it,” regardless of the fact that INTENT “normally” made no difference when a law was broken. One law enforcement source says, “An avalanche of new information is coming in, every day.” It seems the DOJ was doing everything they could to get Hillary elected, and the FBI was trying to do its job. Frankly, I wouldn’t be surprised if Obama didn’t give Hillary a “blanket pardon” for any and all crimes she may have committed, as was done for Richard Nixon after he resigned. (Daily Caller)

Huma In Child Sex Scandal?

I’ve long figured out the reason Hillary and Abedin have stayed with their philandering husbands for so long, even knowing about their transgressions. They may be lesbians, and their husbands are their “beards.” But Huma left her husband recently, maybe because she discovered he was including their 3 (now 4) year old SON in his sexual fantasies. Maybe that became a little too much for her. Lesbianism on the part of two women who were so close in their careers could easily have been hidden, and might be the reason Hillary has not been accused of it, even though everybody in DC knew about it, Remember, all this is mostly rumor. (NY Post)

No Death Threats

The organizer of one of those seemingly "ubiquitous" anti-Trump "demonstrations" is now CLAIMING that she has "received death threats" Because of her role in organizing one of those "demonstrations." Of course, she has shown no PROOF of these "threats." She can't. They don't exist, unless they are manufactured. Making unsubstantiated claims like that is an OLD Democrat/liberal scam. One they have used since--forever. It's instructive to note that so far, ALL the violence committed during, and after this election has been done by anti-Trump forces (definition: Democrat/liberal) Republicans don't have time to do violence over a FAIR election. They have JOBS, and must get up early in the morning. Notice this report is put out by a self-identified BIASED outfit that says it has "been making "Tea Partiers" cry since 2009." Yeah, They cry with laughter at their antics! (Freak Out Nation)