Insane Promises

The Dumocrat politicians running for president (and they are numerous) are trying hard to out-socialize each other while swearing they are NOT socialists. You decide. Is “Medicare for All” not socialism? Socialism requires that there be a certain number of producers of new wealth working to provide the money they use to carry out their promises. Does not “Medicare for all” also depend on this? Today, Medicare only for us “old folks” is going broke. It is in danger of having to delve into its “savings” to pay what it has to pay now, and is slated to go completely broke (no reserves to draw on) within 20 years. So how are they going to finance the massive increase in Medicare COSTS if they ever manage to implement this farce? Then we have others promising not only to pay the tuition for current and future college students, but to “forgive” previous tuition debt. There’s yet another big hit on government finances. Then there is the “minimum salary” they’re promising to give people, whether they work, or not. Which means that many of the “producers of new wealth” will figure out that they are paying the bills for others and stop working, to join the ranks of the moochers, themselves. They just cannot find the money to pay for these impossible, insane promises, and they have to know that, even though they stoutly deny it. (Just common sense)

Stormy Who?

Dumocrats are all upset over Stormy Daniels. Meanwhile, the rest of the country is wondering just what Stormy wanted. She's making a lot of noise over a "non-disclosure agreement" she says Trump forced her into concerning a "one-night stand" more than a decade ago that may, or may not have happened, after she says he paid her a lot of money. But who cares, anyway? She's a PORN STAR. That's another word for WHORE. A woman who screws people for money. so what would she have that anybody would want? Nobody seems to know what she's asking for, just the fact that she's making a lot of noise about it. Does she want another payday? She says she wants to be released from that agreement. So what? She's already violated it in every way possible--IF it does, in fact, exist. Nobody has seen it. Trump didn't sign it by her own lawyer's admission, so what proof is there that he was even a party to it, if it DOES exist? She wants to be released from it so she can do--WHAT? I think all she's after is publicity, to salvage her flagging career, and God knows, she's already got that--though whether or not it will do anything for her "career" is anyone's guess. I think the Dumocrats dug her up and paid her to make a lot of noise about a (maybe) single night affair she can't prove even happened, so they can do their usual song and dance against Trump. They think this will help them win in November, but the voters--whose opinion is the only one that really counts, can see right through her, and couldn't give less of a damn. And who ever heard of her before this? (Just common sense)

Fallon's A Fool

Comedian Jimmy Fallon says that the students demonstrating against guns "speak with more guts, passion, and common sense than any adults." Obviously, he hasn't heard the common sense spoken by people who actually use INTELLIGENCE when they speak. The laws these ignorant children are promoting (with financing and other support from anti-gun fools) do NOTHING to stop gun violence, and more of them will not do anything, either. Repealing the Second Amendment would be a big mistake, and would lead to the MURDERS of many citizens by the government, who would remain armed, while citizens who obey laws would not. And that always leads to government murder. Even in this country, where the government has already murdered many of its citizens, even in a "heavily armed" country. Hitler did it. Stalin did it, and so did just about EVERY new dictator as soon as he took power. Castro started confiscating his citizen's guns within TWO DAYS of taking power, and he murdered THOUSANDS of his citizens. If we allow it to happen here, we will suffer a similar fate. (Off the Wire)

The Next Step

They’ve taken the next step toward a “national ID card” with the requirement that all users of commercial air transport get a “Real ID” driver’s license or be turned away fro flying at all. Most states have quietly “complied” and issue their driver’s licenses including the “Real ID.” The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) will fully implement “Real ID” in October 2020, or so it says. It has been threatening to implement it for years, but so far, it has always been postponed. We’ll see what happens this time. Frankly, I don’t know of ANYBODY who hasn’t had occasion to fly somewhere in his/her lifetime, and that includes me. I think Colorado is one of the states that are “compliant,” but I don’t know if they were when I last got my license renewed. So basically, the “compliant” driver licenses represent a “National ID” already. You don’t need to show an ID to vote a president into office, but you do need to show one to get on an airplane. Seems kinda stupid. But being stupid has never deterred a politician, before. Don’t know if yours is “compliant?” Look at the top right side of your license and if there is a star there, you are. If not, you’re not. You’d better get to the DMV if you want to fly any time soon. (Vox)

IS He A Christian?

The liberal media wants us to believe the Austin Bomber was a "home-schooled Christian" who hated gays and gay marriage, and didn't like abortion, It was supposed to be evidence of his "extremist views." All this is based on some of his earlier writings in school. What they don't tell you is that he renounced his Christianity many years ago, and declared his REAL "extremist views," and that he was an atheist. Then he began to do things that separated him from everybody, even locking his door to his room against his room mates without explanation as to why. This reinforced his increasing isolation from society, and even his family, who ARE devout Christians. The fact that two of his victims were black leads liberal "investigators" to say that racism might have been part of his motive. Which means, of course, they think he was a "right-winger." Also found was evidence he had been communicating with gays on the Internet, which indicates that he was "struggling with his sexual identity," which was not mentioned often. There was no evidence he was a white supremacist or a racist of any sort. But facts have never stood in the way of liberal "Tale-spinners" before, have they? (Clash Daily)

Stupid People Making Laws

It saddens me that we (not me) send so many stupid people to make laws for the rest of us to follow. Anti-gun fools call their USELESS laws, "common sense laws." But they are ANYTHING BUT "common sense." "Common sense" tells INTELLIGENT people that not a single one of the laws currently in effect have ANY EFFECT on "gun violence," except to make it worse, by disarming the law-abiding, who DO obey laws, making them "easy targets" for those who do NOT. Thus INCREASING the "gun violence" and getting even more people killed. There's a good reason why in every city run by liberals, and with TIGHT gun laws, they seem to maintain the highest numbers of gun deaths and injuries. In Chicago, for instance, there is a "state of war" between members of different gangs, and not all those injured are gang members. They regularly kill innocent non-participants, some of them CHILDREN. But they will never admit that, nor take it into consideration. They think they're the smartest people in the room, when they are actually the STUPIDEST. We need to quit sending such people to law-making bodies and find somebody who will find a REAL solution to gun violence, and start controlling the actions of PEOPLE, not guns. (Just common sense)

Hillary Should Be Arrested

The liberals (Dumocrats) are crying about how President Trump should be arrested and imprisoned for the “crimes” they claim he has committed, but they haven’t been able, after two years of trying, to prove one single “crime” of which he is guilty. Meanwhile, the woman who HAS committed all the crimes of which they accuse President Trump is saying publicly that Trump ought to go to prison, while moaning that he “seems to be above the law.” There is PROVABLE evidence of her crimes, but “the fix is in,” and should not be. Trump has, so far, not insisted that she be held responsible for her crimes, even though he fired the FBI Director who said she would bot be punished, “because she didn’t mean it.” But she did. She meant every single crime she committed. She proved that by “bleaching” a hard drive to remove evidence of criminal activity; she “lost” 30,000 e-mails so nobody could know what incriminating evidence there was in them. There was the “pay to play scam where donors “donated” to her foundation instead of her to bypass election laws; she smashed phones so nobody would know the things they contained. And that’s not all the things she did that demonstrated her sure knowledge of her crimes and the fact that she DID “mean it.” Never mind “not meaning it” should have no affect on a criminal’s punishment. Should a murderer be forgiven because “he didn’t mean it?” Not even! But a Dumocrat was “forgiven” her political crimes because she paid off the FBI Director. (Legal Insurrection)

CNN Hates Trump

Surprise, surprise! And they have a scheme to "dump Trump." Surprise again! Seems like everybody has a plan to get rid of Trump, and Trump is as strong as ever. Meanwhile, CNN's ratings are as low, in total, in the first week of this month, as they were for the entire MONTH last year. That's a "freefall!" And they hate Fox, because their ratings TRIPLE those of CNN, after a temporary lapse last year. Maybe their viewers are just getting tired of their continual knocking of President Trump, when the country soundly elected him to "drain the swamp" and "make America great again." Yes, Hillary did get more POPULAR votes, due to the effect of the liberal coastal states and illegal voters. Liberals like to point that out, as if it actually meant something. As if Trump somehow cheated by winning in the electoral College. But the Electoral college was created specifically to keep those highly populous liberal states from "bullying" the rest of the country. Dumocrats are okay with the Electoral College if they win, but not if they DON'T win. All this can be laid to the door of CNN's "credibility gap." CNN has become synonymous with the term, "fake news." You just can't depend on them to tell the truth, especially where President Trump is concerned. He has had some stupendous successes recently, and CNN "plays them down." Always finding a way to criticize them. If they don't "straighten up and fly right" soon. they're going to "go down the tubes, and I, for one, won't miss them. I stopped watching them a long time ago because of their LIES. (Off the Wire)

It's A Cliche´

"Guns don't kill people; people kill people!" That's what anti-gun fools always say whenever we point out this basic truth that they ignore with all their USELESS "gun laws" that do NOTHING to stop, or even slow down gun violence. But nobody seems interested in the reason WHY it is a cliche´. It is such because it’s TRUE! One of the things that push kids to the EDGE is school is bullying. Years ago, you could just punch a bully in the nose and "cure him" of bullying YOU. I did it, on my dad's advice, and it worked, with ALL the bullies that had plagued me to that point. Word got around, and the school didn't make a criminal case out of it. You might get a 3 day suspension, and then go right on with your education, while he, hopefully, has learned the lesson that you will no longer be an "easy target' for his bullying, so he will probably move on to another "easy target," and leave you alone. Today, if you punch him in the nose, you could be EXPELLED from school, and have that on your "permanent record," affecting your entire life, and your ability to be admitted to a good college (if that’s your goal). So it festers and festers, and some kids "crack" and come to school shooting, as Nickolas Cruz did, in Broward County, Florida, after cops ignored massive evidence that it might happen, FBI ignored a sure warning that he might, and a sheriff's deputy cowered behind his car while Cruz murdered 17 people. If we don't change the policies that punish kids for RETALIATING to a bully so that the bullying doesn't "fester" within him, while making sure that sure evidence is not ignored by "the authorities," we will continue to have mass killings in schools. It is NOT the guns. It is the PEOPLE!. Believe it. OWN it! (Just common sense)

"Ol' Joe" Enters Race

For several days now, the “anticipation” of Joe Biden “throwing his hat in the ring” and running (again) for president, has been growing in the media-- the whole media, not just the liberal media, but for different reasons. The liberal media is in breathless anticipation because they think he can “whip Trump,” better than the rest of the numerous Dumocrat candidates—but they’re wrong. The voters rejected him twice, but like Hillary, he thinks a “third time is going to be a charm” that will propel him into the white House. It ain’t agonna happen, Joe. They told you no twice, and they’re gonna tell you no a third time, as President Trump dances back into the White House for his second term. The “conservative media” anticipated, so they could do their job and show the world what a bad choice he would be. President Trump is gloating in the Oval Office because he knows “Ol’ Joe” is going to be easy, while preparing for his second term. The drawback is that after his second term, what? Will a liberal Dumocrat then be elected, or will it be “President Michael Pence?” I certainly hope so. Pence is not a socialist, as so many Dumocrats seem to be. All they want to do is give things WE own away to buy votes, and they think promoting that worthless scam socialism is the best way to do it. They’re wrong, but they’ll never know it. They just aren’t smart enough. Joe has nothing new to offer. Just the usual “giveaway programs.” His announcement video promised nothing except to “get rid of Trump,” something the Dumocrats have been trying to do since he was elected, in 2016. (Legal Insurrection)

Democrats' Losing PLatform

It's as if they don't WANT to get elected. Nancy Peelosi, Minority Leader in the House, wants to raise taxes. She not only admits it, she shouts it from the rooftops. She's PROUD of it. She, and the rest of the Dumocrats think ALL money belongs to the government, and to let us keep more of it somehow HURTS the government. It does. It reduces their ability to buy votes with OUR money. Before she does that, she wants to reverse Trump's tax cuts, and everything else he has done to make this country better. Dumocrats have always been the party that does everything that is AGAINST everything we have ever wanted, or needed. They want to unreasonably tax us at a usury rate to pay for the giveaway programs they use to gain the votes of the lazy and the ignorant. All we have to do to remind you of their perfidy is to tell you, again, of the PALLETS of $BILLIONS of our dollars Obama sent to Iran to ransom a few of our people--in secret, on unmarked airplanes. Where did he get that money? Even a president can't just SPEND that much money without approval from Congress. That, he did not get, and the money he sent was OURS, not his. (Town Hall)

Replacing the America Flag

The proof of the liberal influence at work on the "student march" for their lives is that Emma Gonzalez, a major supporter, made a speech wearing a "Cuban dictator-looking" military jacket bearing a CUBAN flag, instead of the usual American flag worn in America. That tells us she likes Cuba, a country where a new dictator began confiscating the guns of its citizens within two days of taking power, and has since murdered THOUSANDS, maybe more, of his people after disarming them. It is a common theme among dictators to disarm their people as soon as they can. Unarmed people cannot give their dictator much lip without getting killed, or imprisoned for long periods. The Nazis did it; so did Stalin in Russia--and predictably, the murders of MILLIONS ensued. Politicians CLAIM that disarming the populace is to PROTECT them, but it is NOT. It is to eventually ENSLAVE them. But in America, with the liberal media solidly behind our wannabe dictator politicians, it will not be to protect them, but to enslave them, as usual. If you let them disarm you, you can bet that soon they will come for you. (Conservative Tribune)

WAS It An Accident?

“Authorities” were quick to say that massive fire at the Notre Dame Cathedral was an accident. They first said it “could be” a slip by construction workers. Then is was “maybe” a short circuit. Then it was a “probably" a computer glitch. Not even on the list was terrorism, even while Muslim extremists giggled and joked about it, and cheered “whoever did it.” Muslims say is is “punishment” for the Catholics’ “past crimes against Islam.” All of which is a big pile of brown stinky stuff when you look at the instances of “church burnings” all over the world. There have been 800 or more known church burnings, world wide, 400 in Sri Lanka, alone. In America the hundreds of church burnings are blamed on racism, since many are on “historically black” churches. But are they? Or is it all part of the world-wide war on Christianity? Most of which has been created and promoted by Muslims. But Muslims are not the only people who promote the attacks upon religion, principally Christianity. But there have been attacks against Mosques, too. At least one, anyway, which was a “big thing” in the liberal media, while they work HARD to suppress ANY criticism of Islam. But so far, we have no proof of anything, and nobody seems to be looking for any. (CBS News)

She Didn't Know?

Rosie O'Donnell says she "didn't know" she was breaking the law with her "too large" donations to various liberals, even though she used 4 phony names and 5 phony addresses. Oh. So I guess they can't prosecute her for election fraud, as they didn't prosecute Hillary because she "had no intent" to violate the law in the many cases where she did just that. Apparently, both enjoy "liberal privilege" that means they can violate the law at will without being punished, if they claim they "didn't know" they were breaking the law, or "didn't intend to." I guess that's why so many liberals who obviously break the law never get punished. Like John Kerry "negotiating" with a foreign power WITHOUT having any legal reason to do so, in his attempt to save that disastrous "agreement" (not a treaty) with Iran that allows them almost unfettered ability to maintain their nuclear research and development. Bob Mueller has violated several laws in his quest to "get Trump." He has RUINED several innocent people financially by simply forcing them to maintain attorneys at great cost for long periods of time to resist his efforts to TRICK them into saying something he can "describe" as lying under oath. That's what he did to General Kelly, whom even his own FBI questioners didn't believe he lied. And he's still pursuing those charges after "wearing him down" and conning him into pleading guilty, just to "make it stop." (Liberty Park Press)

Rubio Isn't Too Bright

They thought he was when they elected him senator, but he just proved they were wrong. He said, "Many other Americans do not support a gun ban. They too want to prevent mass shootings, but view banning guns as an infringement on the Second Amendment rights of law-abiding citizens that ultimately will not prevent these tragedies." I got a clue for ya, senator; they ARE an "infringement on Second Amendment rights." And it is true that they will NOT prevent such tragedies. He also thinks a ban on "bump stocks" will stop all school shootings. Never mind there hasn't been a single school shooting involving a bump stock. He is a good illustration of the faulty thinking in many politicians, which is why there IS a "gun rights debate," when there shouldn't be, if we follow the lawful provisions in the Constitution. What disturbs me is this fool came very close to being president. We (not me) keep electing fools that think this way, and wonder why so many politicians want to disarm us and leave us defenseless against the guns held by the lawless. (News Channel 8)

Impeaching for Nothing

The Dumocrats are still pursuing their efforts to impeach President Trump, in spite of the fact that a two-year “investigation” (fishing expedition) failed to find ANY evidence of “collusion with the Russians,” or “obstruction of justice” when he fired that “dirty cop,” James Comey, or anything else. Of course, firing Comey was his RIGHT under the Constitution, and did NOT “obstruct justice,” since a new FBI Director was quickly appointed, while the “investigation” continued, and it would have, even if he had fired Mueller, which is also within his power, as president. There WAS “collusion with Russia” in the 2016 campaign, but it was NOT by Donald Trump. Hillary Clinton colluded with Russia to beat Trump, used false “opposition research” as the phony basis for what became a two-year witch hunt that netted not a thing. There is NOTHING that would properly lead to Trump’s impeachment, but that hasn’t stopped certain Dumocrats from “filing articles of impeachment” so they can con more money out of their acolytes. They can FILE all they want, but unless the “charges” meet certain requirements, it will go nowhere, and they will whine and moan about that, saying “the fix is in,” or something like that. (Just common sense)

Why Vote Democrat--Ever?

Nancy Peelosi, the Dumocrat House MINORITY leader is "champing at the bit." She HATES Trump's massive tax cuts, and says what taxpayers will gt will be "crumbs," and the cuts will "cripple" the government. This, in spite of absolute PROOF that tax decreases ALWAYS mean an INCREASE in the "tax take." She wants to rescind them if the Dumocrats take over the Congress in November. She promises tax INCREASES, and the IMPEACHMENT of President Trump. This, notwithstanding the fact that she has NO GROUNDS for impeachment of this president, She figures she can "trump up" something, when she becomes majority leader again. She says she will impose a single-payer health insurance program, and reverse the tax cuts, before she INCREASES taxes. She keeps saying Trump's tax cuts are just a "giveaway to the rich," the usual drivel spouted by Dumocrats, and, as usual, she doesn't detail HOW that is so, because it isn't. She is determined to protect Obamacare, something she considers one of the Dumocrats' primary "achievements." Something that has created havoc in the medical profession, raised prices tremendously, while also raising co-pays to the point NOBODY can afford them, is considered an "achievement." This woman is not only senile, she's insane! (USA Today)

"Kill 'Em, Take Guns"

That's what one Dumocrat candidate for Sheriff in Buncombe County, North Carolina thinks he has the right to do, in spite of the constitutional guarantee of the right of all Americans to be armed for self defense. Frankly, I think he might have bought a bullet for himself when he knocks on the door of a gun owner's house and tries to do that. The gun owner would be fully within his rights to just SHOOT this fool to keep him, or his men from killing HIM. It is fools like this who prove that there will always be dumbasses running for office, who think their wishes and desires give them the right to KILL others, to realize them. And they will usually be Dumocrats, because that's where the dumbasses congregate. I don't know what makes them think they can KILL people to enforce unconstitutional laws, but the Dumocrats think their wishes are more important than those of the Founding Fathers, who wrote that GUARANTEE into the Constitution, the BASIS for every one of our laws. That damned fool notion seems to be built into the Dumocrat way of thinking. Such thoughts should guarantee him DEFEAT at the polls. (Gateway Pundit)

Fishing Expedition Continues

They threw their lure, and the fishing expedition called “The Muller Investigation” continued for almost two years, and came up with nothing. Frustrating to go fishing for that long and not catch a single fish. You’d think they’d pack up their fishing tackle and go home, wouldn’t you? Not this bunch. They’re determined to “catch a fish,” if they have to set off a bomb in the lake. The Mueller Report is out, and Dumocrats disdained it, before they even got a chance to read it. Mueller, who was their “glory boy” when he was appointed, a man of such honor that to have the temerity criticize him should be a crime, bearing a stay in prison, is now called a “colluder.” Not with the Russians, but with President Trump.

They now want to subpoena the UNREDACTED report, as illegal as that may be. They want to subpoena Mueller, because they don’t trust him, any more. He didn’t falsify any “evidence” that would allow them to “cut Trump off at the knees,” so now he’s “the enemy,” and subject to all kinds of insults and even “legal” action. “Pencil Neck” Adam Schiff has pledged to continue HIS “investigation, saying, again, that he HAS “incontrovertible evidence” of Trump’s wrongdoing, as he has said, all along, while never showing “his hand,” because he has nothing. He’s bluffing. He must be a good poker player.

If he DID have evidence, he would have shown it before now. He’s lying, and has been lying, all along. If Trump were not a public figure, Schiff would have been sued for slander long ago. Now they want a look at his personal finances, through his tax returns, something he should block. There is NO “probable cause” to look at his tax records, even while the IRS has been doing so, for some time. Hopefully, the intensity of this “fool’s errand” will lessen somewhat after he wins re-election. If Dumocrats were intelligent, it would. But knowing Dumocrats, it will not. (Legal Insurrection)

Useless Questioning

I just listened (as this is written) to the "dog and pony show" consisting of incessant questioning of the nominee for Director of the CIA, in which she was asked repeatedly if she personally thought "enhanced interrogation techniques" (torture) was "moral." Included in that description of torture was waterboarding, something that, while uncomfortable for the subject, was NOT real torture. But then I realized that the subjects of these "enhanced interrogation" sessions were bloody murderers who tortured and murdered Americans and others at will. In one case, even BEHEADING a journalist on video, which was released to the world. It struck me that the people who would do such things are not able to claim "morality" in their own treatment. They have LOST the right for ANYTHING that is done to them to be labeled "immoral." Whatever is done to these spawns of the devil CANNOT be immoral and are much less than they, themselves have visited upon many innocent people. These people are the "scum of the Earth" and morally should be subjected to the very things to which they subjected their victims on a regular basis. (The Guardian)