Monday, June 15, 2020
The Party of Fools
That’s the Dumocrat Party. Oh, not necessarily all those who count
themselves as Dumocrats and vote that way. Most of them are just not
paying attention, and vote the way they’re told. And the Dumocrats
are ready and willing to tell them how to vote. First of all, the
Dumocrats are socialists, which, in itself, is stupid. Anybody who
really LOOKS at socialism wants no part of it, unless they’re
promoting it to gain power over others. It’s a system BASED on the
theft of the fruits of production of new wealth from the producers,
for the benefit of those who, for whatever reason, do NOT produce,
but only consume. And then there are the silly ideas they promote,
such as that there are more than 2 sexes. They insist on it in the
face of biological proof that it would be impossible.
They
say sex is “assigned” at birth, which is false. It is DISCOVERED
at birth by observing which of TWO sex organs the baby has. Nothing
else can “assign” a sex, no matter how much they protest. They
claim,
transsexualism (where a man dresses like a woman and pretends to be a
woman, or likewise a woman dresses like a man and pretends to be a
man), is a different sex, but it is NOT. It is a mental aberration.
They
claim bigotry if men pretending to be women aren’t allowed to
compete against real women in sports, and even SUE to get their way.
Too often liberal judges agree with them and they prevail. But that
doesn’t make it so. As Ayn Rand said, “A is A.” A can never be
B. It is foolishness to try and make it B
Just
as it is foolish to try and say there are more than 2 sexes. They try
and convince us of other foolish things including believing they can
stop violent crime by eliminating guns—which is an impossibility.
Especially in this country, where we have the Second amendment
guaranteeing the fact that we have the inalienable RIGHT to “bear
arms.” Even so, the millions of ILLEGAL guns out there makes it an
impossibility. Even if that were possible, violent crime would
continue, just using something else as a weapon, as they did before
guns were invented. They
try and convince is that “there are no absolutes” so they will not
be bound by an absolute. But their very statement SAYING there are no
absolutes is a “statement of an absolute.” They refuse to believe
it and continue to insist they are right. Stupid.
(Just
common sense)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment