Brreakdown of Law & Order

I’m worried. Like never before. I was worried in the sixties at what I saw happening, when I wrote my first missive about what was going on, called, “Remember Pearl Harbor,” pointing out the similarity between what happened just before the start of WWII to what was happening then. I thought, in my ignorance, that we only had about 15 years left before the Soviets “took over” in the United States. I was wrong. We somehow won out against all their efforts. Today it’s worse. We didn’t have nearly the degree of a breakdown in law and order then that we have now. Which is because of the failure of the Dumbocrat “leadership: to back up their police when they operate “by the book.” I call them “Dumbocrats” to show my complete contempt for them, and their failure of leadership. Yes, there are a few—very few-- “bad cops” who exceed their authority and abuse people.

They could be “weeded out” and eliminated, if the Dumbocrat “leadership” would just act when they do, and NOT when they go “by the book.” The cops know that, in most places run by Dumbocrat politicians, they may not be supported by their “leaders.” The mobs gather, and then attack the cops while they are doing their lawful duty, and many times the cops withdraw, leaving the field open to the lawbreakers. That happened recently, when they were making a lawful arrest, the mob attacked, throwing all kinds of things at them, from rocks and bottles to broken pieces of concrete, many of which could be deadly missiles if they hit somebody. Meanwhile, the cops can’t use their guns, and are restricted in other things that are effective in controlling people, even though they are being attacked in a deadly manner by the mob, so they withdrew. In other places, the top cops realize they THEY are “hamstrung” in their efforts by the things their politicians (mostly Dumbocrats) will not let them use. Meanwhile, the mob is not constrained in what they can, and DO use against the cops.

I remember seeing the police chief in Minneapolis talking to the press, telling them she is fed up with what is happening, and is going to end it. Behind her, “photobombing” her statement, is a goofy looking character wearing what can be best described as a pink “dress,” adorned with several slogans, with his hair standing straight up, looking amused while he listened. Then he adopted a look that said plainly he didn’t believe what she was saying. He was very close to her, and behind her. In a normal world, he would have been “taken down,” hard, if he fought. In this world, this misfit malcontent was allowed to get within a couple feet of this police chief, where if he wished, he could easily have hurt her badly before she even knew he was there. With no cop close enough to intervene quickly enough.

In Atlanta, a mob has “taken over” the parking lot of that infamous Wendy’s restaurant which was the scene of a “righteous” police shooting of a subject that was fighting them, using their own weapons against them. The Wendy’s the mob set on fire, even though they were not responsible for anything except to do what was the normal thing to do when some drunken fool falls asleep in line and wouldn’t wake up—and so far (at this writing), the cops have allowed it. When law and order breaks down, that’s when the revolution begins, and it is the misfits and malcontents who will be on top if they can continue to count on the ineffective “leadership” of their Dumbocrat politicians. (Just common sense)

Dems Taking Stupid Pills?

There is a Second Amendment to the Constitution of the United states of America that says simply, “[T]he right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” What is there in that which can’t be understood by intelligent people? Yet just about every Dumocrat presidential candidate promises to violate this prohibition in the document, to which EVERY law MUST conform, or it is NOT A LAW. Indian squaw (in her mind) Elizabeth Warren has announced her “sweeping anti-gun bill” that she intended to get passed if she got elected (a forlorn hope). As far as I can tell, every one of the other Dumocrat candidates had similar pipe dreams. All in spite of a CLEAR prohibition on such laws in the Constitution. Warren promises to get rid of 80% of gun deaths with her bill. A patent impossibility, but she’s too stupid to understand that. An impossibility because NONE of the anti-gun laws do ANYTHING to stop “gun violence,” And instead make it worse by disarming the law-abiding and making it easier for the law-breakers to victimize them. We keep telling them that, and giving them incontrovertible evidence it is true, but they ignore it and continue to make their unenforceable, USELESS laws that only get MORE people killed. (Just common sense)

Typical Gun Control Lie

“America leads the world in gun deaths.” There’s only one little problem. That’s a lie. We’re only 11^th on that list. Many people can’t believe that because while gun deaths worldwide are declining (something the anti-gun fools deny) mass shootings have increased. That’s because their anti-gun laws have made it easier for the law-breakers to victimize the law-abiding because they DO obey laws, while the law-breakers do NOT. that’s why we call them law-breakers. Former (whew!) President Obama once said that
This type of mass violence does not happen in other advanced countries.” In that, he was wrong, as he has been in so many things. Being only 11^th on the list means that ten other countries have exceeded our number of gun deaths. Sen. Harry Reid said, “The United States is the only country where this kind of mass violence occurs.” He was wrong, too. Actually, Norway “leads the world in gun deaths.” Surprising, huh? I’d think it was Afghanistan or some other country plagued by Islamic terrorism. The funny thing about gun control is that all their efforts ONLY apply to LEGAL gun owners, ignoring the millions of ILLEGAL guns out there. (FEE)

It's A Disaster!

And it all is happening under Dumbocrat administration. Do some research on the cities where the worst rioting is going on, where mobs are interfering with routine police actions, even killing some cops WHILE they are helping people. The so-called “leadership” is Dumbocrat. On one place a cop was working hard to help a man, who shot him to death for his trouble. It all got under way when those NY thugs threw water on several cops, and the cops didn’t respond because they weren’t sure their Dumbocrat Mayor would stand behind them. Some people think it started with George Floyd. It did NOT. Floyd’s murder was just one more incident contributing to general disrespect for the police. The cop who murdered him had been cited for many abuses in the past, with no punishment, to speak of, by the Dumbocrat “leadership” in Minneapolis. It pains me to see the mobs attacking the cops in NYC who were actually helping people, who were unable to do so as the thugs threw all sorts of objects at them, some of which could be deadly if they hit anybody. To few, if any arrests. Hundreds of good cops are “putting in their papers” and retiring. Leaving what used to be a good, secure job, because they’re afraid. Not of the mob, but of their own leaders, who will not be behind them, even when they do things “by the book.” I’m glad I won’t be around much longer so I won’t have to live under the conditions that are coming. (Just common sense)

Connecticut Registering Guns

They’re lining up in long lines to register their guns and high-capacity magazines. The incompetent politicians there think that will reduce gun violence. I think one guy said it all: “Criminals won’t be registering their guns.” Another said, “If all they want is to know where they are, it’s okay with me.” Which, of course, shows his ignorance at just what massive gun registration means. If they know where they are, it will be easier to confiscate them later. But “knowing where they are” will do NOTHING to stop criminals and crazies from doing their dirty work. When are these stupid politicians going to wise up? Registering guns doesn’t work. Keeping honest people from owning guns won’t work; it will just make criminals, with their ILLEGAL guns have more unarmed victims. Do we have to “crack their heads?” Just common sense)

Nancy Wouldn't Accept Acquittal:

Like, who gives a tinker’s damn what she accepts or does not accept? She isn’t important enough for anybody to care. And another thing: Dumbocrats have promised as many impeachments as it takes to get rid of Trump. They abused the process many times in this impeachment, and they are promising to abuse the process many more times in the future, just because they can. There needs to be placed a limit on how many times one House bunch can abuse the process while attempting to overturn the results of one election and trying to affect the next. This is election interference in the highest degree. And they are spending millions of dollars they took out of YOUR pocket to do it. Further attempts are going to cost more millions, but they don’t care. It’s not their money—it’s YOURS. And they will spend it like they stole it—they did. New laws need to be made to “rein in” the kind of politicians who abuse the process like this. Nancy thinks people care about her impeachment attempts—they don’t. I know I don’t. And if I could vote in the San Francisco election, I’d vote to get her out of office and back to running her grape growing business so she will stop spending MY money on her fruitless attempts to depose a lawfully elected president. Nancy says, “You can’t be acquitted if you don’t have a trial.” Hey Nancy! We DID have a trial—you lost, in spite of all the lies you told and abuses of the process you committed. Get the hell off the pot, girl! Nobody except Dumbocrats want impeachment. (Washington Times)

Committing National Suicide

I can’t believe the incredible STUPIDITY of the people (including some politicians) that support defunding or disbanding the police! The police are the first and last barrier we have against the takeover of the country by criminals and malcontents. Yet the politicians (mostly Dumbocrats) who favor “getting rid of the cops” just can’t see that. They’re totally incompetent and irresponsible. Or they’re part of the problem and want to disband the police so THEY can join the other criminals in victimizing us. They will get millions of people killed, by removing the best line of defense we have, since those selfsame politicians have worked HARD to disarm us, making us even more vulnerable to the outrages of those law breakers. I’m sure they also do not realize that they, themselves, will also be vulnerable to attack by those ILLEGALLY-armed law breakers. Of course, they can afford to hire their own armed security. they’ve got our money, after all. We can’t afford our own armed security because they’ve taken too much of our money. If these fools ever do succeed in “getting rid of the cops,” I don’t want to live in the world they will have created, and I suspect I won’t have to, because some out-of-control thug will probably kill me in the absence of any deterrent to his crimes. (Just common sense)

It's Another Coup

Just like in a “banana republic,” we’ve had at least three attempted coups in this country, all disguised as legal events. Two failed, and the most recent will fail, too. They are disguised as “legal actions” and a “dog and pony show” was had to make it look good. I don’t know if the first one had any basis in fact, but the second one definitely did. Bill Clinton demonstrably LIED to Congress. He was fined many bucks and lost his law license for five years—which didn’t mean anything to him because he hasn’t practiced law for years and doesn’t plan on it in the future. If I kept making the kind of money they pay former presidents, I wouldn’t worry about trying to make any, myself. Besides: he’s got those millions gullible Dumbocrats sent his phony “foundation” until they figured out neither he, nor his wife, could ever do anything for them and the money stopped coming in. Nancy Peelosi has promised many more impeachment attempts and the only way to stop her is to send her back to San Francisco with her tail between her legs, along with the rest of the stupid Dumbocrat House members so they cannot do it again and again with YOUR money. (Just common sense)

Bernie the Nominee?

I shudder to remember when he was a serious candidate for president. I remember a time when being a communist or a socialist was “the kiss of death” for a politician, and rightly so because socialism, and communism, are different forms of collectivism, which is a system BASED on the theft of the fruits of the production of new wealth by a producer, for the benefit of the NON-producer. In other words, stealing the property of those who EARNED it and giving it to those who did NOT. Their very motto reveals this: “FROM each according to his ABILITY, and TO each according to his NEED.” Making need a DEMAND upon the EARNINGS of those capable and willing to earn their own way by those unwilling to do so. That’s STEALING in any man’s language, and those who propose it should never be allowed to run for office, much less the presidency, in a free country. Bernie Sanders “bad mouths” rich people by being rich, himself.

He hates the free market while benefiting from it. He is a hypocrite. The only reason I can come up with to see that this abomination is no longer a “kiss of death” for a politician is that liberals in our education system have been systematically brainwashing their students for years to believe collectivism is the way to go, even though many countries whose government is based on collectivism have failed, big time, while America has prospered beyond anybody’s wildest dreams. The free market is why millions of people want to come here and take part in the economy it has produced—while people just emerging from their teenage years, who haven’t been on this Earth long enough to know anything, LOVE collectivism. They will learn better the longer they live, but they don’t know now—and by the time they learn, we may be the next Soviet Union. (American Thinker)

Not For A Minute

Do I believe the polls that are coming out all the time saying “Sleepy Joe” Biden is leading Trump in so many polls, while hiding in his basement. Meanwhile, President Trump is routinely filling large stadiums with thousands of eager supporters, in spite of the “doom and gloom” warnings from Dumbocrats about attendees getting the virus. I think the old saw about Dumbocrats polling other Dumbocrats in the DNC Lobby is a lot more true than anybody imagined. They poll in Dumbocrat strongholds, among Dumbocrats, who can be counted on to lie about whatever the DNC tells them to lie about. They ask questions that are guaranteed to elicit answers they want to hear, true, or not. When I see a photo (not Photoshopped) of Biden standing at a lonely lectern, giving his standard speech to an almost completely empty room that held only about 20 people, who didn’t even notice when he entered the room, I find it hard to believe he can ever garner enough votes to win out against the “Trump Train.” (Just common sense)

Another Church Shooting

It’s not unique. It happens all then time, and nobody (except the victims) is surprised. One day, there were THREE church attacks. Two on Jews, one on Christians (so far). The one in Texas was stopped by an armed security guard before he could kill any more people. Which again proves my thesis that the BEST defense is an armed resistance. There is no telling how many more people would have died in Fort Worth if that security guard had not been there—and been armed. In New York City, the weapon was a knife, which will not dissuade anti-gun fools from clamoring for more and tighter gun laws, while KNOWING they do NOTHING to stop such killings. New York authorities talk a big game as they “condemn” such things. Meanwhile, their laws tend to make things worse because they “coddle” the criminals who do such things. In one case where a Hasidick Jew was beaten almost to death, the perp was released the same day. That’s just wrong. (NBCDFW)

Continuous Elections

It may seem like we have one permanent election cycle. Is that true? YES! Back in the sixties, Nixon “announced” for the first time his wish to run for the presidency at about this far in advance of the election—about a year out. Today, the Dumbocrats have been “running” for almost TWO YEARS and having many, many “debates” where Dumbocrats fight with each other and the news media (including Fox) obsess over them, as well as the “polling numbers” until the voters become so tired of it, many of them simply begin to ignore it, and that causes a noticeable drop in the number of voters. This began before people had “recovered” from an earlier election cycle. This year they’ve given the media something else to obsess over: the impeachment of President Trump, which is doomed to failure because they didn’t have a case, but they went ahead, anyway. The voters in this country are getting so much “election coverage” they’re becoming bored with it, and this might work to the advantage of the Dumbocrats—which will NOT get them elected in 2020. And I am saddened by the fact that the candidates are ALL swindling donors out of millions of dollars, each. Even the last place candidate has raised millions from gullible donors. The idea of spending millions of dollars to gain a job paying only $200,000.00 a year is ludicrous. But gaining the presidency gives them POWER, and that is what most politicians are after. Some are after the money such a position can give them from corruprion. The stories of politicians who are just about broke when gaining election who later “retire” as millionaires are rife. And nobody asks how they got so much money. Worse yet, they keep on paying them as long as they live. (American Thinker)

"Chilling" the Cops

Because an out-of-control cop murdered George Floyd by kneeling on his neck for almost nine minutes (a completely wrong method of controlling a suspect who was not fighting). They now want to punish ALL COPS for the damned fool actions of one cop and a few “newbies” he was “training.” In doing so, they are condemning many people, maybe even including themselves, to death at the hands of the illegally armed criminals and other kinds of law breakers because the cops will no longer be there to keep tings under control. The real fact is that 99% of cops are “good people” who are only doing a thankless job, and doing it well. Then there are the kind of cops that killed George Floyd, which we could eliminate if the politicians would just do their jobs competently. Disbanding the cops is “throwing out the baby with the bath water.” It is an overreaction, and will not only NOT solve any problems, it will CREATE some deadly ones. And even if they don’t disband the cops, if the public second guesses every time a cop has to make that split second decision to shoot or not to shoot in a stressful situation, it will make some cops hesitate too long and they will get killed. (Just common sense)

Bloomberg's Outrageous Claims

He said, since crime rate went down while he was mayor, he should be credited with saving 92,000 lives. Poppycock! Numbers can be made to say anything you want them to say, but there are not any numbers available as to how many people DIED because of the stupid anti-gun laws in New York. They don’t keep those numbers so they don’t have to report them. It amazes me how politicians like him can “cherry-pick numbers” to prove something that didn’t happen at all. And they BELIEVE their numbers! Bloomberg MUST be aware that his silly gun laws DO NOTHING to stop, or reduce gun violence; that all they do is give ILLEGALLY armed criminals and crazies an unlimited supply of unarmed victims, but you’ll never be able to pound such facts into the heads of fool people like him. (Politicker)

Well, Here It Comes

The “October Surprise. The “last minute” surprise accusation they’ve been saving to use if they lost on the impeachment. The Dumocrats couldn’t prove their impeachment, so here’s the last minute unprovable accusation for the Dumocrats to treat as if the accusation, without any kind of proof, is as as good as gold. Trump is guilty in their minds. They will now tout this as “proof” that Trump is a rapist. And the reason this woman never said anything until she might be able to get a sitting president impeached (again) is a question not asked. It’s the same thing as the “second and third” rape allegation against that Supreme Court nominee they brought up at the last minute in their attempts (plural) to derail the nominee’s affirmation. An attempt that failed because of the lack of any kind of proof. The accuser couldn’t even say for sure it was him. It was only an accusation, based on a hazy drunken memory of SOMEBODY raping her at a “frat party” she attended, many years ago.

Of course, the reason, as in this case, why she waited until she could derail this Supreme Court nominee’s approval was not asked. Nancy Peelosi infamously said, “Proof is not necessary. The importance of the accusation is what must be considered.” Which is completely contrary to the way we do things in this country. Even a murderer is given more protection against unfounded accusations than is this president. In this case, she can’t even remember when it happened. But of course she’s absolutely sure Trump is the man and is insisting on getting his DNA (without a warrant) so she can prove it. Never mind the accused is not required to prove his innocence, the accuser is required to prove his guilt—in the real world. The whole process in sexual misconduct accusations is unfair BECAUSE it requires no proof to ruin a man with an unproven accusation. (Headline Health)

How Does Socialism Survive?

It has failed everywhere it has been tried, and a number of socialist “experiments” still hanging on will soon fail. Socialism failed in the USSR after 75 years of misery for its citizens. It is in its “death throes” in Venezuela right now, with riots to find anything they can use, including toilet paper—of which there isn’t much. They have to use leaves off of trees. In a socialist state that is a little newer, in Cuba, socialism is “winding down” after about the 50 years it took them to deplete what was a busy, prosperous nation’s reserves. Today, the average age of all cars not in the possession of the government is the fifties, held together with chewing gum and duct tape. It will soon fail, along with the other socialist nations. But people are still selling socialism, based on the idea that some can live at the expense of others, and that the government won’t take too much out of the hides of those still working and earning for themselves. There are apparently still enough lazy people out there to make selling socialism profitable—for those selling it, not for the people. But it takes a while for them to notice what they’re losing, so socialism works—for a while, before it collapses and those selling it scamper off to sell it somewhere else, taking their profits with them, leaving misery and death in their wake. I’m seeing socialism rising, even in this country, where the free market was the vehicle for its prosperity, and that makes me glad I won’t be around much longer to have to live under it. (Just common sense)

Background Check No Effect

One of the most popular measures loved by anti-gun fools is the background check. And it is the LEAST effective. In California, where background checks are “the norm” when buying a gun, they had NO EFFECT on the number of gun deaths, according to a recent study. And researchers are “puzzled” at why. Can these people be that stupid? I’m just an old man at his computer and I can easily figure out why. Law-breakers do not OBEY laws, and do not stand for a background check when they get their guns illegally. And it is the law-breakers who are the problem, not the law-abiding, who DO stand for background checks when they buy their guns LEGALLY. There’s no real reason for such laws, except to give the politicians something to brag about at today’s cocktail party. Of course, they have a ready excuse for their “surprising findings.” “Incomplete data and flawed criminal record reporting” are responsible, of course. Naturally they discount the whole idea that criminals don’t obey laws. And, of course, this study got little media notice because it did not fit their preconceived notions. (FEE)

It Doesn't Matter

The news media has a dilemma: which thing do they tout? The Dumocrat primaries, or Covid 19? It’s funny to see them talking about the Dumocrat rivalries as if they were important, while on a Covid 19 set. The Dumocrat race for the nomination is of little importance, since there isn’t a single Dumocrat candidate who can beat President Trump. So it just doesn’t matter which Dumocrat presents himself (or herself) to be soundly beaten by the “Trump Juggernaut.” Each and every one of them who are considered to be more important than the others are promoting policies that are so outlandish and extreme that none of them will ever gain enough support to even get close to the number of votes Trump will get. This time, there will not be a Dumbocrat “wining the popular vote while losing in the Electoral College.” The voters know Donald Trump this go-around, and he will win in a landslide, as Ronald Reagan did in his re-election. In the 2016 election they did not yet know him, only HOPED he would do what he promised, and “drain the swamp.” Since he has been making progress I doing just that while causing an economy that has broken many records, this time they will vote for him, KNOWING he is the man they want, and not the “freebies” the Dumbocrats have promised, using money they have STOLEN from the EARNERS of this country. (Just common sense)

Irresponsible Idea

That’s just one word that is applicable to those who want to dissolve the police departments in the country. Other words are, stupid, idiotic, short-sighted. Think about a rich country that had a strong army to defend itself with, that dissolves that army and disarms it. What do you think will happen when another country that wants what they have discover they are now completely defenseless? They will attack it and take it over. Trash it, and kill its people with no opposition. We’re looking at a similar situation with the cops. They are the only real defense we have against those who want to “take us over,” steal our property and money, and lord it over us. To defund or disband the cops is folly because it is an engraved invitation to the bad guys to come after us because there will be nobody to oppose them, since the government has taken away a lot of our guns and made us wonder what would happen if we used then guns we have to defend ourselves. Would they charge us with a crime for defending ourselves? The basic thing is that you do NOT get rid of your main defenses when threatened by the bad guys. That is stupidity, and therein lies DEATH. (Just common sense)

Ignoring Reality

It really amazes me how many stupid people there are out there, and how many of them have the money to push lawmakers (who don’t require much pushing) into making laws that are USELESS for reducing gun violence, but actually cost many people their lives through not being able to defend themselves against ILLEGALLY armed criminals and crazies. They’re aware of this, but they keep pushing these INSANE gun laws that keep getting passed by ignorant legislators. You don’t defend yourself by DISARMING yourself. And keeping honest people (who obey laws) disarmed in the face of the ease with which criminals (who don’t obey laws) get their guns is criminal in itself, and CONTRIBUTES to gun violence. This is REALITY. But these fools ignore it. Gun control, the way it is now known, KILLS more people than do ILLEGAL guns in the hands of criminals, by itself. I can’t believe there are so many STUPID people out there who ignore this REALITY. (High Plains Leader and Times)

"Most Mass Slayings"

California, with its very tight anti-gun laws, is the state which has had the MOST mass killings in the country in 2019. That should tell the anti-gun fools something, but it won’t. They look at studies like that which came out from Johns Hopkins that show NO EFFECT on gun crime for their highly touted background check laws and ignore the truth, making excuses for the stats that don’t include the reality that background checks, like all their other anti-gun laws, just don’t work. The biggest reason gun crime is so rampant IS their anti-gun laws, which only serve to give law-breakers an easier life because it keeps their intended targets defenseless against their ILLEGAL guns. Previously, I have been confounded by their complete ignorance of the fact than NONE of their laws work as intended. Then I look at the real result of their laws—defenseless law-abiding people who do obey them, and I see that’s what they really want. A defenseless population they can push around at will. If that is the intended result, they’re working perfectly. (Flag and Cross)

Taking Stupid Pills

Apparently, the latest drug of choice is the “stupid pill.” Many people seem to be taking them, and often they are politicians who can enact some stupid things and make them stick. Like de-funding or disbanding the cops. That’s “cutting of your nose to spite your face.” The cops are there to protect them, and form a barrier to the criminals and other law breakers who want to victimize the law abiding. They SAY they’re doing that to “make us safe.” But you don’t make yourself defenseless to make yourself safer. Now they’re talking about getting rid of school resource officers so there will then be NOBODY left to defend your children when a fool comes in with his illegal gun and kills a few. All over the country there are measures taken to REMOVE all means of self defense, for everybody. People are doing it to themselves. Taking guns away from the law abiding is just part of the move to make us all defenseless against the bad guys. And the bad guys are loving it, because it just makes it easier for them to victimize us without worrying about anybody having the means for defense against them. One important question: Who do you call when crooks come when there are no cops? Getting rid of all cops because of one or two bad apples is insanity. (Just common sense)

Did You Know?

Chicago, New Orleans, Detroit, and Washington, DC, the four cities with the toughest gun laws in the nation, put us THIRD in the WORLD in murders. Without those cities added, we’re 4^th from the bottom of the list. That’s not conjecture or opinion, that’s FACT. But a fact IGNORED by those incompetent politicians who make laws that do nothing but present ILLEGALLY armed criminals with more unarmed citizens than they can rob or murder. These are hard facts. You’d think the people why SAY they want to “curb gun violence” would “tumble” to that and aim their efforts elsewhere than on the guns themselves. Guns, without evil hands holding them, can do NOTHING. They need to make laws to “Curb” the PEOPLE who USE those guns for evil purposes by giving them longer sentences for using guns to commit crimes. Don’t ban the use of guns for honest people who OBEY laws by MAKING laws to disarm them. But these incompetent politicians ignore reality and continue to make more and more USELESS laws that kill innocent people by disarming them. What will it take to make these incompetent politicians see reason? Nothing, I suppose, because reason is not part of their lexicon. (Just common sense)

Mass Stupidity

That’s the only way I can describe those who think thy can eliminate guns entirely from the world, and that to do so will eliminate violent crime. The real evidence shows absolutely that anti-gun laws have never worked to prevent “gun crime” and, instead, INCREASE it by disarming the law-abiding, making them defenseless against those who use ILLEGAL guns to victimize them. But they ignore that and continue to insist on making even more of the useless, unenforceable anti-gun laws, while people die because of them. And it’s not just those I call “anti-gun fools.” It includes politicians who buy their silly notions and make those laws. It is the news media that promotes “gun control” that controls nothing. And nothing ever dents their “stone brains” with logic. They have bought this silliness as if it were real, and they just can’t see anything that denies it. They blame the guns, period. Never mind finding out why so many people want to victimize people, with, or without guns. It just does not get through to their little brains. We keep showing them the evidence and they keep ignoring it, while continuing to make their stupid laws that just get more people killed. Everything I’ve written above, I’ve written before, but it’s as if I’ve never written a word, to them. (Just common sense)

Sorry Folks

No updates today. didn’t get a chance to get any work done since I spent most of the day in the ER because of acute heart failure. I AM an “old fart,” you know. Back to work tomorrow (I hope).

The People Know

Gun control is NOT the answer to defending yourself against the fools who riot and declare they are “coming to the burbs to take what’s ours.” You can’t depend upon the cops. They are overwhelmed as it is, and even so, they can’t be everywhere at once with their guns. So the only real answer is a gun in the hand of the intended victim. The people know that, and that’s the reason they are flocking to the gun stores to build up their arsenal so they can properly resist those fools when they come for what THINK is theirs, but which is NOT. The anti-gun fools think a gun in a man’s hand will automatically make him a crazy shooter, which it will not. Their entire goal is to get rid of guns, period. And that’s never going to happen. They will never get rid of the millions of ILLEGAL guns already out there in the hands of the law breakers. That way, they can reduce “gun crime,” one criminal at a time, by killing the criminal when he comes for their property. If ANY of the laws the anti-gun fools have caused to be passed did ANYTHING to limit gun crime, I’d be right there with them, But they don’t, and instead INCREASE it by disarming the intended victims. (Gary Varvel)

Actions of Fools

2013 was a year of fool actions, to be sure. But will 2020 be any better? Not with the anti-gun fools being still in office. The problem is not the very EXISTENCE of guns; it is that people with bad intentions GET guns. Lawmakers THINK making laws against criminals having guns (which, unfortunately, includes good people having guns for self-defense) will stop the crooks from seeking out illicit gun dealers who sell their guns out of the trunk of their cars in back alleys. They will NOT. But that never deters these fools from making their useless laws that do nothing but give ILLEGALLY-armed criminals a steady stream of unarmed VICTIMS; which makes crime rates rise, and, more importantly, makes the number of gun deaths also rise. Nobody seems to be able to get through to these ignoramuses. They’re “tone deaf” to logic. Some even deny the very EXISTENCE of logic. Maybe some day these fools will “wise up.” I hope it happens before some criminal shoots them with an ILLEGAL gun. (Just common sense).

Handcuffing the Police

Are we going to second-guess them every time a cop is forced to use his gun in self defense for himself or for others? We’re going to make cops afraid to use their guns, even when their lives are threatened, and that’s going to cost cop lives, and incidentally, the lives of those they are supposed to be protecting. There’s a move afoot to disarm the cops, and what we’re doing today accomplishes that, by making them afraid to use their guns for fear of being fired, and worse, imprisoned themselves, together with the very people they have put there. The killing of George Floyd was NOT “righteous.” He was NOT fighting. He was already “under control,” but then had THREE cops put him down and kneel upon him, one with his knee on his neck, killing him. In Atlanta it is not quite so clear. This subject was actively fighting, and getting the better of several cops. He had stolen one of their stun guns and was using it on one of the cops. That stun gun could be a deadly weapon in the right circumstances. And then there’s the fact that he could have taken that cop’s gun while he was “out of it” from the stun gun and killed one of the other cops. The knee-jerk action of the mayor in firing that cop within hours was an overreaction. If she files charges against the cop that will be a tragedy. (CNN)

Making Anti-Gun Bigots Angry

It’s easy to do. Just try and argue LOGICALLY against their pet ideas like putting locks on guns in locked gun safes in the house so when an ILLEGALLY-armed criminal comes calling you’ll never be able to get your gun into action quickly enough to keep him from shooting you with his ILLEGAL gun. Of course, his gun is not subject to such STUPID laws because he doesn’t OBEY laws. Of course, that makes your gun USELESS, which is their goal, anyway. Or their propensity for “registering” all guns so the government will know where they are, and who owns them when they get ready to come calling and confiscate (steal) them. They get angry because they know they can’t ANSWER your logic. So they just walk away in a huff after calling you nasty, vile names. Names that would have gotten them shot 100 years ago (which was a GOOD thing). Fools like that ALWAYS get angry when people attempt to confront them with logic. (Just common sense)

It's A Damned Lie!

Every time you see a criminal on TV in one of the “cop shows,” he’s shooting at the cops with a full-auto Machine gun. Which paints a very different picture of what happens in reality. The instance of crooks using machine guns is only in the imaginations of the writers and “prop masters” of those shows. Most criminals can’t even afford a machine gun, much less use it properly. The only way they even get one is to steal it—which is not inhibited in the least by anti-gun laws. They’re shown spraying bullets in all directions while those “intrepid cops” patiently wait until they have to change clips, then kill him with one shot. Yeah, right. Fanciful thinking. The fact is, most criminals are lucky to have a “Saturday Night Special” which today is a 9mm Glock, or something like it. It’s very rare when they have a gun anything like a machine gun. The idea of a criminal walking around with a machine gun under his coat is ludicrous, but the TV writers don’t care. Gunmen spraying bullets everywhere is very exciting, and it builds viewership. So they continue to write their scripts that way, and nobody can stop them. It IS “fiction,” after all. But it does present a very twisted picture of what real cops are up against. And politicians like “Horse-Face” John Kerry talking about “knowing all about AR-16s because I hunt” after sponsoring useless anti-gun legislation doesn’t help any. (Crime Prevention Research Center)

Abolishing the Police

What an abysmally stupid idea this is! Only total stupid politicians would go along with this stupid idea. You don’t protect yourself by getting rid of the very people and things that defend you. The same is true of one of the best defensive tools, a gun. Getting rid of the cops on one bad idea, but getting rid of guns just compounds the error. Guns are like fire. They can help you or hurt you, depending on how they are used. But if you eliminate them, they can neither help NOR hurt you. Getting rid of the cops and getting rid of the guns are both getting rid of your ability to defend yourself, and that is the main goal of those who want to get rid of both. To leave you completely defenseless against those who do not get rid of their guns so they can more easily victimize you at will, without worrying about your ability to defend yourself. Those who push such ideas are those who will be the ones coming at you to victimize you, one way or another, later. And I include politicians in that. In any case, getting rid of then cops is one of the stupidest ideas to come down the pike. The cops are the first and last line of defense for you. Fear of the cops is the only thing that limits the criminals in what they think they can do to you. It’s what keeps them “at bay.” And punishes them when they come to victimize you. (Just common sense)

These People Are Stupid!

Recently a deranged individual went into a US military base featuring UNARMED military personnel and killed a few, before some ARMED men from OUTSIDE the base came in and dealt with him. The MINUTES between the time that fool started killing innocent military personnel and the arrival of the armed men who dealt with him meant DEATH for a number of them. So what happens? They reinforce the UNARMED situation on other military bases, making them DEFENSELESS against such fools. They immediately told other military personnel they didn’t care if they got murdered. These are people who are RESPONSIBLE users of guns. They are TRAINED to be. So what earthly reason do you BAN the carrying of firearms by base personnel when you KNOW that makes them prime targets for those deranged people who want to kill a few of them for whatever deranged reason they have in mind? The action by the “powers that be” at Offut Air Base is just the OPPOSITE of that which should be taken. Base personnel should not only be ALLOWED to be armed, but REQUIRED to be armed, with weapons supplied by the military. Security should be STRENGTHENED, not weakened. What fools there are running things there! (KETV)