Subjective Laws

A subjective law is one that may be “defined” by those wishing to prosecute it. In other words, it is not really an illegality until someone SAYS it is. Laws must be the same for everybody to be OBJECTIVE. Otherwise a despot may “decide” something is illegal, just to be able to “remove a thorn in his side” by prosecution. That is what is happening to President Trump today, as Dumocrats insist that there was a “pro-quo quo” involved when Trump asked the Ukrainian president to investigate a lawbreaker in his country because he happens to be related to a presidential candidate. Frankly, a lawbreaker should not be impervious to an investigation of his actions, just by being a relative to a politician. On the contrary—and the only people who CAN investigate Hunter Biden are the Ukrainians, since his lawlessness is in their country, and the president has a right to ask them to do so. And the only people who think Trump was holding up their foreign aid to “pressure” them to do so are the Dumocrats, who have actually DONE the same thing. Biden himself, in fact, threatened to hold up billions until they fired a prosecutor who WAS investigating Hunter Biden, and he bragged about having done it as Vice President, on TV. The Dumocrats have a habit of accusing their opponents of doing what they have done. (Just common sense)