The Dumocrats are unalterably biased in favor of conviction when it
comes to President Trump. There isn’t a day that goes past without
some Dumocrat fool coming out and telling us what they are “going
to find” in the next “investigation,” without any kind of real
evidence. Jerry Nadler, on questioning their “former friend”
Robert Mueller, says they have some “specific questions” that
will FORCE him to reveal things not revealed before to “get
President Trump.” One Dumocrat has tried to get articles of
impeachment through three times, in a “friendly place,” the
House, and lost all three times. Then he goes out and slanders Trump
some more. There ought to be a way President Trump can respond
meaningfully to these fools, but there is not. Politicians are
“protected persons” because they are “public figures,” no
matter how bad, how scurrilous is the slander. The people who are
slandering Trump are the very ones who are PRETENDING to “decide”
whether or not to get rid of him. This is wrong. It’s
like putting a murder case up in front of the father of the victim
and expecting a fair trial. They should not be allowed to go over the
same facts over and over again after finding NOTHING to convict. They
can’t do it with an average American and should not be able to do
it to the president. (Just common sense)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment