Moore's Gonna Sue!

I don't think the Washington Post expected this. they've slandered many Republicans in their time, and most of them just "roll over and show their defenseless belly" while trying valiantly to overcome the unsubstantiated stories of sexual misconduct displayed in the pages of their newspaper. Moore's gonna sue, and I'd bet he's gonna get rich from that suit, because the Post has not a single shred or REAL PROOF that he tried to arrange an assignation with a 14-year-old girl. One girl's own MOTHER disputes her daughter's story of Moore calling her on her cell phone to arrange it. She says her daughter did not even have a cell phone, nor a land line in her room at that time, making that story a LIE. Not only that, we now know at least one young woman was offered "big money" to accuse Moore of sexual misconduct. And Moore asked a "fateful question": "Why now?"

Why did a young girl who was supposedly sexually misused 40 YEARS AGO wait until ONE MONTH before an election to come forward with an accusation that could not be proved? The big problem here is that the only "evidence" that can be cited is that girl's UNSUPPORTED WORD about the encounter, while Moore says he's never even HEARD of that girl. This thing is a typical Dumocrat "dirty trick" they have used successfully on other candidates and conservative TV personalities, with the able help of their accomplices in the liberal media, who laid heavily on the accusation day after day, while even REPUBLICANS demand his "stepping down," regardless of his guilt or innocence. Meanwhile, they "circle the wagons" when one of their own is accused. It should be obvious to intelligent people, just what this is. The problem is that claims of sexual misconduct on conservatives seem to be accepted WITHOUT any kind of PROOF while those aimed at left-wingers REQUIRE such proof. (Breitbart)