I'm Worried About Nancy

She's showing distinct symptoms of early onset Alzheimer's. In a recent 7 minute speech, she stumbled and mispronounced several simple words, and mispronounced the names of several countries. After her 7 minutes, she thanked them, then stood staring into space for a few seconds, before walking off stage. In an interview on another network, she called Trump “The Diverter In chief,” then proceeded to divert attention from her own failings by repeating, over and over, that Trump “had no jobs bill.” Of course, he doesn't NEED a “jobs bill.” He creates jobs by getting rid of unnecessary, jobs-killing regulations, and getting rid of laws that also kill jobs. Nancy better retire before her symptoms become so obvious they won't be able to cover them up, any more. (American Mirror)

Death To Their Cause

Liberal anti-gun fools (a redundancy, there) hate judge Gorsuch, because they know he is “death to their cause” of disarming every man or woman in America. They know that, if he is confirmed (and he was), it will make the Supreme court more “friendly” to non-liberal causes for a long time. And they can't have that, so they tried everything they could to derail his confirmation. For them, it's a losing proposition. And looking forward to the NEXT Supreme Court appointee is even worse, for them. Because if it comes while Trump is still president (which it probably will, with two current members already talking about retirement), it will change the makeup of the Court for decades to come. They KNOW Gorsuch is a “gun-friendly” judge, and they were TERRIFIED he he was confirmed. Which will ruin their chances to make Americans defenseless for a long time, as he rules properly on the Second Amendment, and creates rulings that will make it even harder on them. (National Shooting Sports Foundation)

More Bloomberg Rejection

Former New York City Mayor Mike Bloomberg, now the chief anti-gun fool in the country, has suffered many defeats to his extreme intentions. All of them lately in his anti-gun efforts. He should have stayed in New York, where he was a little more successful (running for an ILLEGAL third term, and winning). His latest defeat is in New Mexico, where they rejected his latest effort to get his gun control bills passed into law, making it harder for people to be able to buy guns (and thus be DEFENSELESS against all the ILLEGAL guns already out there). His proposed laws would have only taken guns away from law-abiding people, and would have done NOTHING to stop, or limit gun sales made ILLEGALLY. which is a feature of ALL the gun laws I've ever seen. He spent a quarter million dollars this time, which is “pocket change” for him. It was a half-hearted effort for him, maybe because he's getting “tired of losing,” and he knew he had NO chance in a state like New Mexico, which has a long history of being “gun friendly.” (NRA-ILA)

The Death of Free Speech

I'm old enough to remember back in the sixties when liberals were all for freedom of speech. They still are, but now only if that speech agrees with them. They do everything they can to STOP freedom of speech if it comes from a non-liberal source like Ann Coulter or any other conservative speaker. Then they riot, break things and hurt people to keep her from speaking. They're so frightened that what she says might be HEARD by someone that they want to stop her from speaking, altogether. That tells me something. If they're scared of what she might say so badly they RIOT to keep her from talking, what she says IS important, and I, for one, want to hear it. At the same time, it makes them smaller in my eyes, and in everyone else's eyes. (Breitbart)

There's "No Evidence"

The current Democrat insistence (without any kind of proof) that Trump colluded with the Russians to get elected aside, there's another situation for which there is NO EVIDENCE to support. That's the “climate change” campaign. That “flight of fancy,” only supported by “fake science” and computer models with NO real proof, is widely believed by many damned fools, from AlGore, who was the first well-known personality to push it (and it has made him a billionaire), and Barack Obama. The original name of this swindle was “global warming,” but had to be changed, when it was found that the globe has NOT been “warming” for almost 20 years, so they could attribute ANY weather anomaly to it, and keep the money rolling in. They can't prove ANYTHING, and they know it. So now they want to make being a “climate change denier” a criminal offense, and either put “deniers” in prison, or fine them a lot of money. That's one way to shut them up without the bother of having to answer their charges, I guess. (Just common sense)

Obamacare Based On Lies

Obamacare was promoted by lying to us. We were told that if we liked our doctor, we could keep him/her; same with our hospital or health care plan, if we had one, Then that rates would go down by half; they TRIPLED, and the deductibles became thousand dollar deductibles, making the insurance USELESS. Obamacare is one of the biggest SWINDLES ever perpetrated upon the American people, and put millions of people in dire danger of having NO usable health insurance when they sorely needed it. Nancy Peelosi summed up the swindle when she infamously said, “We have to pass the bill to find out what's in it.” Since when do we have to pass such major bills into law without knowing what's in it? Obamacare was passed into law in the “dead of night,” and sprung on us without warning. If it were so good, why did they need to make buying it MANDATORY? And FINE us if we refused? The answer is, it ISN'T, and they knew it, which is why they FORCED us to buy it, or pay a stiff fine. The perpetrators of this swindle say the Republican substitute is a scam, and will take millions of people off the health care insurance rolls. What WILL happen is millions of people who want no part of Obamacare, or any other brand of government-run health care will not sign up, and will do something else. They're frightened that we will destroy their swindle, so they try to convince the country that the American Health Care Program is worse than theirs was. The truth is, their scheme is falling apart as we sit here, so it won't be around long, anyway. (Just common sense)

Liberals Lie Again

On CNN, an infobabe said categorically that when Reagan lowered the tax rate significantly, that this action caused the national debt to rise “out of control.” Which is an out-and-out LIE. After he lowered the tax rate, the tax income INCREASED and almost DOUBLED! It created the longest lasting BOOM in the country's history! There's a simple reason for that, which the liberals either can't or WON'T understand. When you let people keep more money, especially “the rich,” they USE that money. They don't put it in deep, dark vaults where it's never seen again. They INVEST in job-creating projects, and that causes unemployment numbers to go down while causing the creation of NEW WEALTH to increase, as well.  More people have jobs, make more money, and thus SPEND more--and pay more in taxes.And that causes there to be new tax money to be paid. (Just common sense)

Truth About Sheriff Joe

Sheriff Joe Arpaio is guilty of NOTHING except doing the job he was elected to do, for the first time, 22 years ago. He was a “hard man” when it came to lawbreakers, but “an old softie” when it came to abused animals. He even had a program in his jail to pair up prisoners with dogs he took from “shelters” that “executed” them after only a couple days in captivity. One prisoner was heard to pray: “Lord help me to be the man my dog thinks I am.” He and Obama were deadly enemies because Obama was the kind of lawbreaker he usually has in his jail, not sitting in the White House making people's lives miserable. Obama got in the last word by filing misdemeanor charges against him, days before his latest election, causing him to lose. Joe will “beat those charges” because they're based on nothing. But his career is ruined, because of Obama's slimy tactics. Maybe he can get elected again, next time. (iPatriot)

CNN "Tripping Out"

They reported that Sean Hannity pointed a gun as liberal Fox News contributor Juan Williams after another political argument. That he even turned on the laser sight, putting a red dot on Williams. The story was completely false. Hannity SHOWED Williams an UNLOADED gun, and no laser sight was ever turned on. It was NOT the result of an argument. Hannity was simply SHOWING Williams the gun to emphasize a point. All safety conditions were recognized, and Williams himself disputes the veracity of the story. “At no time did I feel threatened, and I and Sean remain good friends.” CNN seems to be in the throes of beginning a mental breakdown, their “fake news” becoming more and more evident and silly. This article suggests they accept the offer of a tabloid publisher, since they're DIRECT competitors in the same market. (Breitbart)

Same Ol' Same Ol'

I said this scam wouldn't work on Trump, but it looks like it has. He appears to have “caved” on his wish for a billion dollars for his “wall” to keep a “government shutdown” from happening. That's too bad. They finally found something that seems to be working against Trump in this scam, so you can bet it will happen again and again. It's hard to say how they always manage to blame the Republicans when this happens, but they do, even though it's the Democrats refusing to cooperate on ANYTHING Trump wants that is the cause, if the government actually DOES :shut down,” which it never actually has. What is CALLED a shutdown by Democrats is always just something bureaucrats themselves CAUSE by refusing to pay bills and laying off a few government workers. Then they blame the Republicans, and the people buy their lies. (Just common sense)

Democrats A "Sinking Ship"

That's what Bernie Sanders thinks, anyway, and he may be right. It began sinking when it ran Hillary Clinton for president against a “powerhouse” like Donald Trump. It sank some more when it repeatedly underestimated Trump, including still being convinced she would win as late as 9 PM on election night. Now it is paddling downward with their strategy to demonize Trump and get him removed as president—a forlorn hope. One of the things that is sinking them was the Democrats “fixing” the primaries so Bernie never had a “snowball's chance in hell” of getting the nomination, although he was clearly the superior candidate (though hopefully, when other than Democrat fools got to vote, they wouldn't elect an ADMITTED socialist). Debbie Wasserman Schultz lost her job as Democrat Party chair over that, bequeathing the title to Donna Brazile, who infamously “leaked” debate questions to Hillary (She finally admitted it, the other day). They've tried everything, and lost every time. Now they're not smart enough to realize they've lost, and to start doing something to change their party so as to win, next time. Now, all they can do is lay on the floor, kick their feet, and scream while the world passes them by. They need to go to their “safe space” where they'll never know they're dead. (Patriot Tribune)

Screwed Up Again

Heads are going to roll at the Secret Service. Twice recently, a “fence jumper” has been found to be running around on the White House grounds for from fifteen to twenty minutes. The most recent one was even able to “rattle the knob” on a door, trying to get inside. When he wandered his way to the West Portico area, he was FINALLY spotted by a uniformed SS man, and he was apprehended. Of course, the SS responded with many men and women, blanketed the grounds, and found nothing. It's a good thing neither men were a serious threat, or somebody might have died. Soon, the man whose most famous saying was “You're fired”” will do his thing, and I don't know how many SS officers will survive his attack. Maybe Trump ought to get his own security people and take personal control of his security. (USA Today)

Just Like I Predicted

A woman has accused Sean Hannity of sexual harassment—without anything like proof to back it up, of course, but her unsupported word). Even if it were true, it sounds like just a guy trying to make a date. It's way too easy for a woman to DEFINE such as sexual harassment these days. Hannity immediately branded it as false, calling her a “serial harasser” who would do anything to get noticed. And it is true this woman has made many such accusations in the past. She recanted within two hours. I expect this to be only the first of many false reports on Hannity. I look for other women to “pile on,” as they usually do when somebody accuses somebody of sexual harassment. That's all part of the scam. None have any proof, but they accuse, anyway, hoping the celebrity will pay them off. Of course, the liberal media jumped right on it. (Daily Wire)

Government Wasting Your Money

Incumbent politicians seem to think it's a crime for anybody to suggest that they could do with less money. But frankly, they WASTE more money than we could ever take away from them by legislation. And when it is found out, they just shrug their shoulders, saying,”That's life,” and go right on wasting as much as they can on their various give away projects. One such as the current runaway rail project in Hawaii that is costing TEN BILLION DOLLARS that they say is “Too far along to stop now.” Current politicians wanted to cut four miles off their projected construction schedule to save money. The project was touted as “reducing traffic problems,” but, if completed as designed, would only reduce traffic ONE PERCENT. Then we have the “Bridge to Nowhere” in Alaska, and the “Big Dig” in Boston. All boondoggles. (Just common sense)

Disarming America

That seems to be the goal of the anti-gun fools. Every law, every regulation they propose, make Americans defenseless against the millions of ILLEGAL gun already out there in the hands of all kinds of “bad guys,” none of which wish us well. I don't know how they figure that will stop gun violence. You CAN'T stop criminals from getting guns. They usually don't get their guns legally, anyway. But every law the anti-gun fools promote make honest people defenseless, while doing NOTHING to hinder the getting of, and the use of guns by the “bad guys.” In fact, their laws make it easier for them to victimize honest, law-abiding people. Gun-free zones, for example. The theory is that, if people aren't allowed, by law, to bring their guns there, that will solve the problem. But the “bad guys” don't OBEY laws, leaving law-abiding people defenseless against them. Gun safes, trigger locks, and all the other devices they force us to use, likewise. They make it impossible to get the guns we do have in operation fast enough to effectively oppose a “bad guy,” who doesn't follow the rules. By so doing, they simply get people killed, while doing NOTHING to “stem gun violence." You'd think they'd learn that, but apparently they don't have sufficient intelligence to do so. (Just common sense)

AP Hiding the Truth

I'm getting very tired of the liberal media trying to hide the truth about Islamic terrorists. I don't know what their motivation is, and I don't care. When a black racist who shouted “Allahu Akbar!” when he killed three random white people on the street, the Associated Press “edited” his shouts to “God is great,” rather than the true words, “Allahu Akbar!” which means the same thing, but reveals his allegiance to Islam. It is that allegiance they want to hide. I don't know if they really WANT the Islamic terrorists to win, or not. But still their attempts to “erase” the Islamic terrorism connection is reprehensible. The bad thing is that this tendency to HIDE all references to Islam is not limited to AP. It runs all the way through the liberal media's handling of reporting on terrorist attacks, attempting to HIDE all references to Islamic terrorism. That will be the death of us if it continues. (Daily Caller)

What Do doctors Know?

Yeah, I know. Doctors are, for the most part, smart fellas--in their specialized fields. But they, as a group, know NOTHING about guns, so why would anybody accept their pronouncements about them? They're now saying, “Automatic weapons belong on the battlefield, and ONLY on the battlefield.” Next, they'll be echoing those judges who said automatic weapons are NOT guns, and are not protected under the Second Amendment. These are generalizations, and the generalizations don't work. What if an Islamic terrorists or just a criminal or crazy comes at you with a fully automatic weapon? Without your own, you wouldn't stand a chance. And that's not something that will never happen, the way things are going today. With Islamic terrorists flooding into this country, disguised as “refugees,” the RAPE figures are going steadily up, as are the murder rates, although nobody has yet seen fit to connect that with the entry of Islamic terrorists into the country. The whole idea that you can defend yourself by DISARMING yourself is absurd. (New Haven Register-News)

Violates First Amendment

That's what they say about making laws barring doctors from asking you about guns. Next, they'll make laws FORCING you to answer truthfully about your guns, or face action for lying under oath. And they'll put you in jail for refusing to answer. But for now, if your doctor asks you about your guns, just tell him (her) it's “nonaya business.” He may have a First Amendment right to ask you, but any effort to DEMAND an answer violates the Fourth Amendment. For my part, I don't care what kind of laws they make, my answer will still be the same if my doctor asks about my guns. It's not his business to ask, and it has nothing to do with my health. The government is getting way too far into my personal business, and I'm not going to allow it. So they can jail me if they can. (Daily Caller)

It's Firin' Time

In Texas, a few Obama holdovers in the Border Patrol ordered a 40 mile stretch of the border to be unpatrolled. They actually DID it. And put it on paper! The way to take care of the attempted undermining of Trump is to GET RID OF those doing it. Some can't be easily found. This bunch is so brazen they actually put their contrary order on paper! I think they knew their time was coming to an end, and wanted to “go out with a bang.” Trump probably didn't have them specifically targeted, but I'd bet the farm he does, now. These fools are not long for this job. One anonymous Border Control agent said, “The drug cartels exploit out weaknesses, and they will certainly exploit this one.” Maybe that's the purpose of this order. The guy giving it may be in cahoots with the cartel, and WANT to create a weakness for them to exploit. (Liberty Headlines)

Determined to Be Stupid

Chicago's top cop, who should know better, opposes a law now under consideration to apply longer sentences” for criminals who use guns in the commission of a crime. You'd think that would be a “slam dunk, wouldn't you? Because it puts the onus squarely on the shoulders of the lawbreaker, not the law abiding citizen, as most anti-gun laws do. He seems to think it's just another way to put black men in prison. Maybe so. But if black men use guns in a crime, they DESERVE it. In Chicago in 2016, 4,378 people were shot, resulting in 717 dead. Most of them black men shot by black men, except for the black women shot by black men, and a few white men and women. That means somebody was shot every two minutes, with somebody killed every 12 minutes. Most of them black men killing black men. And he thinks this is just an effort to send more black men to prison? “If you can't do the time, don't do the crime.” That's a well-known saying, and it's true. (Bearing Arms)

Backdoor Gun Control

Some anti-gun fools sit on the bench. That is proven by a recent “ruling” by the 4^th Circuit Court of Appeals. They ruled that certain automatic weapons aren't guns, and thus aren't protected by the Second Amendment. The AR-15 is a gun. What part of “gun” don't they understand? Never mind. Their ruling demonstrates their bias. And it ignores previous rulings and “gives the finger” to the Constitution. It creates “backdoor gun control, if a bunch of black robed fools get to define a gun as “not a gun” so they can rule against it. I don't know what these judges are smoking, but it I were a druggie, I'd want some. Maybe we need to start drug testing judges—or even INTELLIGENCE testing. This is an incredible stretch to gut the Second Amendment, and tossed common sense out the window, while making their own rules. This decision again points up the need for some CONTROL over out-of-control judges, who rule AGAINST the Constitution and define words to suit themselves. (ADN)

Bill O'Reilly Is Out

Fox has made it official. BIll O'Reilly will not be coming back. He will not even be able to have one last, “farewell” show so he can say goodbye to his fans. All because some woman CLAIMED he sexually assaulted her (with no proof, that I've seen), and several other women who saw an opportunity for a payday followed suit. It's a real shame a man's life can be ruined by the UNSUPPORTED WORD of one woman. I think subtle sexual misconduct should be punished, but not with NO corroborating evidence, and based on somebody's UNSUPPORTED WORD. One time when I worked for Avis Car Rental, I actually got accused of sexual misconduct, and the details were impossible to prove, or disprove. But they had to take it seriously, and I was under suspicion for a time, until it just “faded away” because there was really nothing to it. The worst part is I was never told who MADE the accusations so I could face my accuser and actually ANSWER the charges. They weren't true, but I never had the chance to demand PROOF that I could disprove. I don't know—maybe there IS proof on O'Reilly. But it has never been made public, so O'Reilly could disprove them. They were ASSUMED to be true, obviously. Fox actually paid out millions of dollars without even ASKING O'Reilly, and made an unilateral decision to ruin him. I don't know who is going to replace him, but I hope they can get ratings anywhere near his. (Just common sense)

Feelin' Their Oats

New York politicians are getting cocky where gun rights are concerned. They think they have the power to ban guns, even though the Constitution, the basis for ALL of our laws, says they can't. And they also think they can ban the use of “Tasers” and other stun guns, also. Now they're arguing that people don't have the right to have a gun in their homes, OR a stun gun. They forget there is an inherent right to self defense (a “right of birth”), and guns or even stun guns are the means to that end. The obvious purpose of this is to take away people's right to self defense, period. They want to ban EVERY means of self defense, making their people DEFENSELESS against the millions of ILLEGAL guns already out there, in the hands of the “bad guys.” When somebody suggests that, they never give a cogent answer. They just :laugh it off” as if it doesn't exist, and they don't need to give an answer. They'll be reversed by a higher court, of course—if that court actually rules according to the Constitution, which they are bound to do. But in the meantime, Many people will die, because they have no means of self defense. One day, if heavy ash trays are used to stop an attacker, they'll ban heavy ash trays. They just want to keep people defenseless. (Ammoland)

British Hypocrisy On Guns

They don't want most of their cops to be armed. They have almost a total ban on private gun ownership, though they have very high gun violence rates. Not only that, they're the biggest manufacturer and exporters of guns in the world, outside of the United States. The British arms industry employs 350,000 people spread over 11,000 firms, and as many as 1.2 million people relying on guns for a living. Britain has sold 3 billion pound's worth of guns to countries where the most human rights violations take place. So CHILDREN in “developing countries” get guns, to use in killing adults AND children. While Brits get no guns—except for all the ILLEGAL guns sold there by criminals, for criminals. Which number in the millions. (Truth About Guns)

N. Korea's False Image

Kim Jung Un, N. Korea's pudgy, ugly little dictator, paraded a BUNCH of soldiers and phony-looking “hardware” in a parade celebrating the birthday of Kim Il Sung, the “founder” of the current regime. It featured a thousand soldiers, and looked very impressive, although we have 8 times as many troops, just in Afghanistan, which is a very low number after Obama told most of the 50,000 troops we had there to “cut and run,” like he did in Iraq. And I think most of the “hardware” he exhibited were just EMPTY SHELLS, containing nothing. Paraded just for show. ONE of our MOAB bombs would take out more than HALF of his army if we targeted his parade. Kim likes to talk big, but I think he seriously underestimates the United States as his enemy. Which will mean his END, if he keeps on the way he has been going. It's like the old simile of a flea crawling up an elephant's leg with rape on its mind.. I'm sure we know where he is, at all times. It wouldn't be too hard. We wouldn't even need a nuclear bomb to deal with him. Just send a MOAB and target the place where he is currently applauding himself while basking in the glory of being their “dear leader.” Something he retains by killing his relatives and anyone else he perceives as a threat to his tyranny. (Bloomberg)

Rogue Judges

The judges who blocked President Trump's travel ban didn't rule, based on the law or the statutes. They didn't even PRETEND to do so. They did so, based on nothing but their own biases and prejudices. There needs to be some way to stop such “rogue judges” from interfering with the president's ability to protect this country--which he HAS the power to do—and they do NOT have the power to stop. The judiciary can't just rule on things the way they'd LIKE for them to be, but how they ARE. They are supposed to rule according to constitutional guidelines,and statutes. They are not allowed to MAKE law, even though some have done so, because nobody did anything to stop them. It's time somebody did, and I think Trump is just the man to do so. There needs to be established a group—call them a committee, a board, or a commission, I don't care what they call them, that can oversee such rulings, and if they do not go according to the Constitution and/or the statutes as passed by congress and signed by the president, they can be reversed, and if a particular judge keeps making such rulings, remove him from the bench. (Just common sense)

Doing Everything They Can

Anti-gun fools want to make life difficult for people who want to LEGALLY buy a gun to defend themselves against the millions of ILLEGAL guns already out there in the hands of the “bad guys.” Now lawmakers in New York want to force legal gun owners to buy expensive “liability insurance,” thereby making gun ownership even more expensive. This, of course, assumes that LEGAL gun owners are the most likely to MISUSE their guns. It ignores the fact that MOST misuse of guns are on the part of owners of ILLEGAL guns, who can't be made to buy expensive liability insurance because they usually can't find them—and if they do, they usually take those guns away. As usual with most anti-gun laws, this law only applies to LEGAL gun owners, who aren't usually the problem. (Ammoland)

Odious Muslim Practices

There are many things Muslims do that are odious to normal human beings. Threatening DEATH to those who refuse to convert to their phony “religion” is one. Another is their “cultural thing” of keeping small boys (and girls) chained to their beds for repeated raping, and MARRYING little girls as young as SIX. But one I dislike as much as anything they do is beating their women. Yet it is not only APPROVED by their "religion," the Koran INSTRUCTS them on how to beat their women for the slightest real or imagined “sin.” I recently saw a video made by Kuwaiti cleric Othman Al-Khamis, in which he instructs men to “lightly beat them” because the purpose is to humiliate them. And they wonder why normal people turn away from them. (DC Clothesline)

Stupid Assumptions

The anti-gun fools will confidently tell you to “Forget about getting a gun for self defense because the cops can protect you.” But when they say that, they're stupidly wrong. And the cops will be the first to tell you they're wrong. They know the cops need time to get there when called. All they can do is “clean up the scene” and MAYBE catch the bad guy, AFTER he has done his dirty work. And maybe dispose of the body, if necessary. The “rank and file cops” know this. The police politicians often don't. Some of them even were never cops on the street, but they pretend to know everything there is to know about policing.

The cop on the beat likely tells his own family to go armed, because he KNOWS they are their FIRST line of defense against the millions of ILLEGAL guns, already out there in the hands of the “bad guys.” Another stupid assumption on the part of anti-gun fools is that, if they can just get rid of all guns, crime will stop. It will NOT. Back when there were no guns, there was still crime. When they wanted to kill, they used other means. In cave man days, they used clubs and big rocks. Today, they use guns, because there ARE guns, and anybody who thinks a law will keep guns out of the hands of the “bad guys” is dangerously deluded. (Slow Facts)

Trudeau Supports MURDER!

Canadian Prime Minister Trudeau says that, “Opposing abortion takes away women's futures.” Thereby supporting the systematic MURDER of millions of innocent, defenseless BABIES! Yes, it MAY “take away the future” of some women who want to have unprotected sex without the bother of raising the result of that sex. That's pure selfishness and EVIL to want to MURDER your offspring because you're too damned LAZY to bring it up. Those who have more than one abortion are SERIAL MURDERERS. I never thought I'd see the day when GOVERNMENTS would not only APPROVE of baby murder, but PROMOTE it, as Trudeau is doing. This is our holocaust. We all know it's happening, but we can't build enough opposition to stop this massacre of our future. What if Bill Gates' parents had had him aborted? How about Albert Einstein? There's no telling how many advances this civilization might have missed because a potential GENIUS was murdered in the womb. (LifeNews)

Liberals are Outraged!

They're always outraged when we actually DO something concrete. After 8 years of :”playing at” being at war in Afghanistan, Trump is REALLY fighting it, using the MAXIMUM of what we have, outside of nuclear arms. Obama imposed some of the most ABSURD “rules of warfare” possible so he could tell the world he was fighting the Islamic terrorists, while not really doing so. Trump means business. He means business in everything he does, and that includes whatever wars we are in, and the ones we BECOME entangled in because of the LACK of a coherent foreign policy on the part of Barack Obama. In dropping the MOAB bomb (The “Mother Of All Bombs”) on a terrorist tunnel network in Afghanistan, he destroyed their ability to move about unseen, “popping up” unexpectedly where we least expected them, like a “Whack-A-Mole” game. Something that will save many lives And, although it has not been “announced,” I'm sure he has rescinded those silly “rules of warfare” that handcuffed our troops for so many years, and got so many of our troops killed. (Just common sense)

Democrats Never Learn

Facts bounce off them like water bounces off a duck's back. Reducing the tax burden on Americans RAISES revenue by causing more productivity. When taxes are high, it DEPRESSES productivity, and thus also tax revenue. Reagan lowered the tax base drastically, and tax revenue INCREASED 55%! Democrats whine that there were many other causes, thereby DENYING that Reagan's tax rate cut had anything to do with it But, as usual, they're WRONG. I'm no economist, but even I can see where that works, and the people who PRETEND to be smarter than the rest of us should ALSO be able to see that—but they don't. They just can't (or won't) understand how LOWERING taxes can create a revenue INCREASE. But facts are facts. EVERY time we have reduced taxes, revenue has gone up. Every time! But Democrats, and other liberals, will NEVER admit that. All they want is a higher percentage of what WE earn, even if that does REDUCE the total intake of money. (Just common sense)

"Down the Rabbiut Hole"

It has happened. MOMS Against Guns (or something like that) want to ban MEN. They tell young women who are looking for love that men are out to kill them, so they should “stay away.” They have come up with a figure (from I don't know where) that if they are in a relationship with a man, there's a 50% chance he will kill them, so they need to get rid of THEIR guns (those that have them). Seems like a damned fool argument, to me, but then, every argument I've ever heard from liberals is a damned fool argument, and is against logic. I seriously doubt their figures, but experience tells me they will insist on spouting them, They figure if they say it, we MUST believe it. even if we prove them false. And PROOF? Liberals never provide proof of their expostulations! So MOMS has “gone down the feminist rabbit hole.” That comes with frustration, and as many fights as they have lost, they MUST be frustrated. (Gun Free Zone)

Doctor "In Drag"

There are a couple of questions raised in the case of a medical doctor being assaulted and dragged off an airplane because United Airlines wanted his seat. This is after he had paid a stiff price for the seat, and was actually seated on the airplane. Yes, the “contract” represented by his very purchase of the ticket, whether or not he wished to agree to it said they could “bump him” at will. But it does NOT say they can assault him, injure him, and send him to the hospital by forcibly DRAGGING him off the airplane. Somebody screwed up royally, and I think it was that cop, who merely got mad at the man for refusing to “follow his orders.” Orders which he had no authority to issue. They had the option to go to the other passengers to get permission to pay them to vacate their seats, but they didn't bother. They just beat this doctor up and dragged him off the plane. The CEO of United apologized, and was, himself, appalled by the action. But I maintain that the very POLICY that brought this on was wrong. I'm sure it will be changed, but probably not enough. This whole thing is going to cost United millions, and that's a good thing. It will send a message that they can't treat people in this manner. A lesson to their own, and all other airlines to cease and desist in this policy, the way it is being practiced. People cannot be treated like cattle, beaten up, and dragged down an aisle and out of a place. Period. (CBS)

It's A "Good Cause"

When I got a carry permit in Indiana years ago, they required me to come up with a “good reason” why I needed it. Not being very political in those days, I didn't question the requirement. I just told them I had occasion to have a lot of company money on me on weekends, since banks weren't open on weekends then, and night deposit was a hassle. But this case is all about that requirement, and the fact that it is an “infringement” on our constitutional right to be armed in self defense. The Ninth Circuit (bless 'em) upheld the decision of a lower court, saying the constitutional right was “sufficient “good cause” and nothing further is needed. So it is going to the Supreme Court now, and one can only hope they consider it after Judge Gorsuch is on the Court. Update: Gorsuch is now on the Court, so we should be in good shape. (Breitbart)

Americans A Minority?

That's what Univision anchor Jorge Ramos thinks, anyway. Somebody needs to slap this fool down and straighten him out. He says “This is OUR country,” as if that were true. In the dictionary, next to the definition of arrogant activist, is his picture. He is no more a “journalist” than I am. And I am NOT. I am a commentator. I AM biased, in favor of truth and freedom. He is NOT. He thinks in 30 years, there will have been enough illegal AND legal immigrants from his country move into the United States to outnumber us in our own country. He will have stiff competition from Islamic terrorists, who are coming in through every hole there is in the “wall.” But don't forget, Americans will be increasing their numbers, too. (DC Clothesline)

They Were SO Sure

Democrats predicted a landslide victory for a Democrat candidate in Kansas special election, saying it would be a repudiation of Trump. But the Republican won by 6 percentage points. So what is the big story in the liberal media today? Sean Spicer's “Hitler” faux pas. The contretemps on a United Airlines flight where a passenger was “roughed up” and dragged off an airplane so some employees could take his seat. Not only that, they aren't saying much about the fact that Putrid....er, uh, Putin decided not to snub our Secretary of state while he's in Russia to take them to task for supporting that mass murdering war criminal in Syria. Neither are they talking about the Washington Post finding there WAS a FISA warrant that allowed them to surveil a Trump volunteer during his candidacy, which opened the door to spying on Trump. That's how they avoid covering stories they don't like. The Kansas election was a repeat of their ignorance in the presidential election, where as late as 9 PM on election night they were still celebrating a Hillary “landslide victory” that was not to be. (The Hill)

Rising Gun Thefts

From cars. “Gun free zones” pose TWO dangers to humans. First of all, the danger that they will be unarmed when a criminal, crazy, or Islamic terrorist comes in a place where he can be pretty sure law-abiding people will not be armed, to kill people. That's the first, and most obvious danger. The second is the rise in gun thefts from cars as people who carry guns go into places where guns are not allowed. They put their gun in the glove compartment and go in to do their business. A thief breaks into their car and steals the gun. Next week, he might bring that same gun into the same place, in front of which he stole it and do HIS business with the gun. That “gun-free zones” create a new opportunity for gun thieves again, is obvious. It is an unintended consequence of gun-free zones, along with all the people KILLED in gun-free zones by guns. Meanwhile, putting a gun safe in your car is an absurd suggestion. But look for anti-gun fools to make it. And DEMAND it. As soon as they realize what's going on. (“Shall Not Be Questioned”)

Major Overreaction

In San Antonio, Texas, they found 75 old bullets in the basement of a house. Really dangerous, huh? Old bullets have killed many people from just “sitting around,” haven't they? So they evacuated the whole neighborhood and called in the bomb squad to dispose of them. The picture I saw showed many thousands of dollar's worth of unneeded responders and their vehicles and equipment to dispose of 75 BULLETS that probably wouldn't even fire any more, anyway. Not to even mention how much money it takes to PAY all those cops to stand around with their thumbs in a place I will not mention. This is an excellent example of the silliness of the thinking of anti-gun fools who have offices where they can panic like this, and make it into a “big thing.” (Fox San Antonio)

LA Times Whining

They're crying “crocodile tears” over the loss of the “mainstream media” and the “alternative media” using the “same set of facts.” Of course, what they're really whining about is that, with the rise of the “alternative media,” they've lost their MONOPOLY on “the facts.” They can no longer be the only source of “the facts,” so they can no longer “mold opinion” to suit themselves. No longer do they get to DICTATE what “facts” we hear. In their lament, they ASSUME that the alternative media only deals in “fake news,: when it is the “mainstream media” (which should better be called the LIBERAL media) that is the one that deals in “fake news,” and that is provable. They cannot prove the “alternative media” does it, no matter how much they try. So they just SAY it, hoping people will believe it, since it has been repeated so many times. They can't get their monopoly back, because the American people are waking up to their lies. (Just common sense)

Savaging Gorsuch

For his careful examination before ruling. He was called, in 2014, to rule on a case where a man was given a “deferred judgment” and successfully completed the requisite time passage without incident, and the conviction was expunged. Not, however, to bureaucrats. He served with distinction in the Navy, and was a gun instructor. He had several guns in his home (because he didn't know he was still considered a felon in their eyes) when the cops raided it, and he was charged with being “a felon with a gun,” when he actually was NOT. That conviction had been reversed, but they kept it on the books for banning his ability to own guns purposes. Gorsuch ruled in his favor, and anti-gun fools hate him for it. They've been searching diligently for something, ANYTHING to keep him from the Supreme Court, and this is what they came up with. But, far from making him ineligible to serve, it CEMENTS his eligibility, at least to intelligent people. (The Hill)

The "Muslim Ban" Fantasy

It amazes me how liberals keep on pushing their fantasies, even to the extent of pushing them on foreigners. The pipe dream that Trump was pushing a “Muslim ban” is one of those. It has been debunked, over and over, but they still insist on saying there IS a “Muslim ban, when there is NOT. Their ignorance is demonstrated yet again on “Good Morning Britain,” when Piers Morgan suggested that a gun ban would be a more important step to self defense than Trump's “Muslim ban.” It is that fiction that has already led to many deaths, through the disarmament of many Americans. But Australian immigrant Nick Adams set him straight on the importance of the Second Amendment to personal defense against Islamic terrorism, as well as domestic criminals and crazies. But Morgan will most likely go right on believing in the non-existent “Muslim ban.” (Bearing Arms)

"David and Goliath"

N. Korea's fat little dictator “warning” Trump not to try anything” or he'll “strike back horribly” reminds me of the old “David and Goliath” story, but with a little different ending. This time it will be DAVID that goes down. If Kim thinks he can significantly damage the United States with the THREE nukes in his arsenal against our HUNDREDS, He's CERTIFIABLE. But then, we already knew that about him. One thing's for sure. If we DO “try something” against him, it won't be something small. And he won't know about it, because he'll be gone. We're getting very tired of his “running his mouth” with little to back it up. (Western Journalism)

Illogical and Stupid

The measures sponsored by the anti-gun fools are illogical and stupid, as is their basic premise. Their basic premise is that, if they can get rid of all LEGAL guns, crime will go away. But that completely ignores the MILLIONS of illegal guns already out there, in the hands of “bad guys.” Their laws are not designed to protect ANYBODY, but are simply designed to make it more difficult for people to get their LEGAL guns in action quickly enough to oppose a criminal with an ILLEGAL GUN, or to keep them unarmed, period. They are designed to make them defenseless, and have killed many people by disarming them. They think the way to self defense is to be disarmed, and that''s about as stupid as it gets. When asked to tell us what their laws are supposed to do to protect us, they can't give a cogent, logical answer. They just spout their nonsense about making the world “gun free,” which is the worst thing they can do, because their idea of “gun free” does not count those ILLEGAL guns the “bad guys” already have. There is absolutely NO WAY to get rid of ALL guns, but that is their illogical dream. Meanwhile, their laws and regulations are killing many people. (Just common sense)

Determined to Kill Us

Everything the anti-gun fools do is designed to make people DEFENSELESS against the millions of ILLEGAL guns already out there in the hands of criminals, crazies, and Islamic terrorists. But they have no suggestions as to how to defend yourself if faced by one of those illegal guns, except to “call the cops.” Maybe just before you die. In Wisconsin, a bus line forced people who already held concealed carry permits to disarm themselves before boarding their buses, even though that is against state law. Statistics show that on a bus is one of the most likely places for people to be accosted by a thug with an illegal gun, so forcing people to disarm themselves to ride their buses is illogical, to say the least; life threatening, at worst. Fortunately, the Wisconsin Supreme Court thought differently, and that bus line's prohibition goes away. There's no telling how many lives that ruling may save, over time. (Ammoland)

I'm With Rodney King

I'm not saying the beating the LA cops gave him was deserved, or not deserved. That will be decided by history. What I am with him on is his question, “Why can't we all just get along?” Trump sent 60 Cruise Missiles into Syria in response to the MURDER of a bunch of CHILDREN through Assad's use of chemical weapons on his own people. I do NOT condemn that action, but I DO condemn the use of chemical weapons on his own citizens by Basher Assad. Assad called the attack “irresponsible,” but the only thing irresponsible here is his killing people indiscriminately with chemical weapons. Then there is the terrorist attack in Russia where a bomb was placed in a transportation center, and the truck that was hijacked and driven into a department store in Stockholm, Sweden, killing five and injuring many more. If we could just get along, this kind of stupidity wouldn't happen, and innocent people would not have to die. But apparent;y, that's too much to hope. (Telegraph)

Fearing Guns

Those who fear guns, themselves, are abdicating their responsibility for their own safety. It is an IRRATIONAL fear. Some call it “Hoplophobia.” That isn't a recognized medical description, but neither are the made-up words, “Islamaphobia,” “homophobia,” or “xenophobia,” words used to “criminalize” people who don't agree with somebody. I say “irrational fear” because they fear ALL guns, wherever they're pointed. You should NOT fear a gun pointed away from you, or just sitting on a table. Without somebody's hand on it, it can't hurt you. This irrational fear is purposely instilled in some people, usually as children. Anti-gun fools make a big thing out of children finding guns and killing themselves or others, in their lack of knowledge. Yet they are adamantly AGAINST the NRA training that can prevent this. And they make up numbers by such schemes as calling a 35-year-old woman gun victim a CHILD victim. (The Federalist)

Gun to A Bar Fight?

Martin Knowles, in Idaho Falls, Idaho, got mad when he got kicked out of a bar for arguing with a man in a cast after stepping on his injured foot. So he came back later with an automatic weapon and a handgun, threatening everybody in the bar including that injured man's wife. So they took his guns away and beat the hell out of him and called the cops. The cops arrested him, charging him with many things, including menacing, and being a felon in possession of a gun. Knowles was charged some time ago with drug charges, and was therefore not allowed to legally have those guns--but he had them, anyway--until he pulled them on those bar patrons. Thus proving (again) that “gun laws” do NOTHING to prevent such people from getting their guns. And this guy was also an incompetent at handling those guns, because that guy in a cast took them away from him before the rest of the bar patrons beat the hell out of him. Cops ignored that beat-down when they got there. (Truth About Guns)

Liberal Media Wrong Again!

Liberals routinely call Ann Coulter racist. How then, do they account for the long friendship she has enjoyed with “Good Times” star, Jimmy Walker, who is black. What kind of racist dates a black man? This points up a fact that is rife in the liberal media. That they commonly say people are racist, who are NOT. And every once in a while, they get proven wrong, as they have, in this case. It proves, once again, that what they say cannot be depended upon. Following the actions of Barack Obama, they label ANYBODY who has a different opinion than theirs, a racist. And by so doing, have destroyed the effect of the allegation. Nobody cares, any more, if they are called racist by liberals, because it has been proven to be untrue in so many cases. I've lost count of the many times they have labeled me racist, because I'm not afraid to write the truth about them, regardless of race or creed. They call me Islamaphobic, too, because I “calls 'em as I sees 'em.” (Conservative Tribune)

It Is NOT True!

Anti-gun fools claim that this country is a growing crime-infested nation, which is why they want to take away our right to have and use the means of self-defense, a gun. But they're wrong (again). It is not. In fact, as gun sales rose as a result of Obama's anti-gun activities, violent crime dropped significantly. Gun sales to black men are still increasing because of Trump's election. Mostly for self defense against other black men who use ILLEGAL guns. States, all over the map are considering and PASSING measures to get rid of “gun free zones” and allow concealed, OR open carry, which is making violent crime go down, even more, America ranks 99^th on a list of countries with intentional homicides, out of 191! That's down to the 50% level. That's far from a “gun frenzy.” And most of the countries on that list have very tight “gun control laws.” Some ban guns, altogether. (The Observer)

Why Is A Law Needed?

In Arizona, they have made a law against infringing on gun rights. My question is, why the hell do they need a LAW to stop states from infringing on constitutional rights? Doesn't the very fact that the Constitution PROHIBITS infringement on gun rights in America rule? Will a LAW be obeyed any more than a constitutional provision? If any LAW is needed here, it should be to PUNISH legislators who make laws that DO infringe upon constitutional protections. They should not need a LAW to keep people from violating the Constitution. The constitutional prohibition alone should do it. Seems to me they just want to complicate things by making more and more LAWS to do the same things already covered. (Bearing Arms)

Now They're After O'Reilly

CNN is “leading the charge” to “defund” Bill O'reilly. I guess now that a woman (or several women) have “come out of the woodwork to accuse him of sexual impropriety, they figure they can get rid of their “worst enemy,” The O'Reilly Factor.” Bill scares the hell out of them because he not only tells it like it IS, he does it to an audience that's bigger than theirs. It's a known factor that when one woman sees a possible payday by accusing an innocent man of sexual impropriety, others follow suit, for their own paydays. It's too bad that the only thing necessary to ruin a man's reputation is the unsupported word of one woman. This has been one of the most successful scams Democrats have ever been able to use against their enemies, since all it takes to ruin a man's reputation is the unsupported word of one woman, and it's easy to get other women to follow suit. If you look closer into the women making accusations against O'Reilly, you'll find all of them are Democrat operatives and are easy to convince to accuse O'Reilly, to get a big payday. It was just made worse by Fox's decision to pay off those women, I'm sure violently against O'Reilly's wishes. (NY Times)

"Not A shred of Evidence"

There isn't a single shred of evidence that Trump or his people “collaborated” with the Russians to beat Hillary. Liberals are telling us that Obama is “collecting and preserving evidence of this collaboration for release at the right time.” But when is the right time? If they ever discover some real evidence instead of the IMAGINARY evidence they claim to have? Believe me, if they HAD any evidence, the “right time” would be NOW! They'd be shouting it to the skies! It's a common scam used by liberals (Democrats) to claim to have “evidence” that they are “holding for release later.” But no such “evidence” ever appears, because there ISN''T ANY. But they push it, and push it, anyway, hoping the American people will come to believe it. Now that Trump has said he had been “wiretapped” by OBAMA in the last days of the election, the Democrats are saying that Trump must PROVE it, right now! It's different, now the shoe is on the other foot. It is widely known that Obama did a LOT of wiretapping in his effort to unseat Netanyahu in Israel, so why not, here? (Just common sense)

Killing the Spiteful Lead Ban

On his last day in office, Obama signed an order banning the use of lead in bullets to “make life miserable for hunters.” They CLAIM it was to “save the lives of animals. But aren't bullets MEANT to kill? Seems like an unnecessary rule, meant only to throw a “last shot” at the new Trump administration ans make life harder for people who own and make guns. So Trump's new Interior Secretary (who rode to work on a horse) immediately reversed the ban and scotched Obama's plan , “nipping it in the bud.” It is said that this order was a last parting shot of a frustrated anti-gun fool to help make life more difficult for Trump, as well as hunters and fishermen (the ban extended to fishing lures). This action is just one in many that will be needed to reverse Obama's harmful “rules,” imposed WITHOUT being passed by Congress, that are not so obvious as this one, and must be “ferreted out” before reversing. But they will be found, and dispensed with. Count on it. (Bearing Arms)

Searching for Anything to Criticize

Mike Pence is making news these days for being devoted to his wife, It's because of the “Billy Graham Rule,” that Graham instituted after finding a naked woman in his hotel room, who wanted to seduce him, so as to destroy his ministry, and fleeing from the room. It involves never being alone with a woman other than his wife, and never drinking alcohol if she isn't beside him, nor dining with any other women. It appears that VP Mike Pence follows the same rule. They criticize him for that, even in some cases saying that he “adheres to Muslim principles.”Which is supposed to really paint him nasty. Liberal reporters obviously are looking for ANYTHING they can twist to make Trump look bad (such as intimating, with no proof, that he has slept with his daughter), and making Pence look bad is an adjunct to that. They can't find anything on either man, so they make it up. They find something admirable (if misguided for a VP) and make out like there's “something sinister” about it. The practice IS a “little overboard,” because a VP is going to be required to deal with many women, in his job. It's admirable to want to stay as far away from temptation as he can, but even going that far is not bad. (Washington Post)

Worried Abouty the Budget

Trump talks about putting money into “infrastructure repair” when fully 10% of bridges are UNSTABLE and might collapse, as one did the other day. It was on the list of unstable bridges, but nobody bothered to come up with the money to fix it. Democrats are “concerned” over budget issues. Where were they when Obama was sending pallets of CASH totaling BILLIONS of taxpayer dollars to the world's biggest supporter of Islamic terrorism, Iran? Or putting millions, even billions into failed “environmental projects?” Obama spent our money like water, but Democrats never expressed “concern.” It's really odd how they use “selective concern” only when a Republican suggests spending a little money. (Bridges Collapse)

Enough Is ENOUGH!

“This is a message to the Left. To Nancy Pelosi, Jerry Brown, Kamala Harris, Maxine Waters, Diane Feinstein, Eric Garcetti and all the Leftist Socialist Communist politicians in California and throughout the nation: WE HAVE HAD ENOUGH OF YOUR LIBERAL POLICIES TOWARDS ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS AND CRIMINALS - YOU ARE GETTING OUR POLICE OFFICERS AND INNOCENT CITIZENS KILLED!!!” This is something they will deny to their dying day (unless somebody with an ILLEGAL gun kills them soon), but it is true. They are getting people killed by the hundreds, even thousands, and among them are lots of cops who have fallen to ILLEGAL guns lately, in more numbers that before, because of the rhetoric of “Black Lives Matter” and other left-leaning propaganda mills. The way to self defense is NOT disarming yourself in the face of all the ILLEGAL guns already out there. (Totally Right)

Why Not Gorsuch?

Sen. Diane Feinstein (D-CA) has signaled that “based on his record and his testimony in the Congress, I “can't vote for his confirmation.” And why is that, so you suppose? Because he will rule based on the law and the Constitution, that's why. And liberals like Feinstein can't have that. They want a justice that will rule THEIR way, regardless of what is in the law or the Constitution. So now Republicans are going to have to impose “the nuclear option” that DEMOCRATS put in place, hoping to get their own candidate approved to replace Justice Scalia (who was probably MURDERED to get another liberal on the Court). They will force them to do that so they can forever say Gorsuch is a “bad candidate,” and thus will be a bad appointment, since he “couldn't get the required 60 votes,” and they had to use the nuclear option to get him confirmed. What remains unsaid is that the only reason he couldn't get 60 votes is because the DEMOCRATS were dead set against ANY candidate Trump appointed, no matter what his qualifications. They suggest “we get together and come up with "mainstream" appointment” (translation: an appointment DICTATED by them). They KNOW Gorsuch will be confirmed. They're forcing this JUST so they can say that, forever. (Just common sense)

The Arrogance of California!

As it stands today, if you have a license to carry a gun in any state, you CAN'T carry it in California unless California gives you one of their precious concealed carry licenses (which will cost you a bundle), which is something I wouldn't hold my breath for, since turning blue doesn't particularly appeal to me. But if the act now introduced in congress passes, and Trump signs it--which he most likely will-- they will then be able to concealed carry in California, as well as all other 49 states (or 57, according to Obama). This causes much vomiting in the anti-gun fool camp. The very THOUGHT of Americans being able to carry guns in larger numbers gives them the willies. That's because they think disarming yourself is the best way to defend yourself from all the ILLEGAL guns already in the hands of criminals, crazies, and Islamic terrorists. (Totally Right)

Why Women Buy Guns

One of the largest groups buying guns now are women. One reason is that some men like to rape them (especially today, Islamic “refugees” who pretend not to be terrorists), and without something like a gun to protect themselves, they're defenseless. As more and more Islamic terrorists pretending to be harmless people fleeing the terrorists, the rape figures predictably rise, as they have in Europe, where they welcome them with “open arms.” Another group that CAN'T have their own guns are young boys. It is a “cultural thing” to Muslims to rape little boys, and even chain them to their beds to be raped again, later. That was proven in Iraq when an Iraqi COP was found to have a small boy chained to his bed and was raping him regularly. When found and punished, the locals objected, saying raping little boys was “a cultural thing,” and nothing should be done about it. There are many “bad dudes” in this world, and women want to be able to defend themselves against them. So more and more of them are getting guns,—and rightfully so. (Bearing Arms)