The Two Faces of Islam

“One face is for Islam’s useful idiots the other is for Islam’s faithful” (American Thinker). That simplifies it tremendously. They tell one story to the gullible fools who BUY their kind of bullsh-t, and another to “the faithful,” those who are willing to KILL everybody who doesn’t believe EXACTLY the same way they do. They are building “believers” on the basis of FEAR. Fear if you don’t “convert,” and fear if you change your mind and convert to another “religion.” They have to do that because there is no LOGICAL reason to believe their “political system” IS a “religion.” So they threaten to kill you if you don’t convert, and if you later change your mind and go elsewhere. They really think that someone who converts to Islam at the point of a gun are REALLY converts. They aren’t. They’re just god actors and “go through the motions” to stay alive. It’s time we quit PRETENDING that Islam IS a “religion” and recognized it for what it is: a “fool’s errand” if you believe in it, and a bunch of thugs if you don’t. (American Thinker)

It Disturbs Me

That local police agencies are getting $5 billion dollars’ worth of MILITARY gear. Even small communities like Greenwood, Indiana are getting what amounts to armored cars and automatic weapons. I’m sure they’re getting bulletproof vests, too. The guns and bulletproof vests don’t worry me because the criminals are getting the same equipment to use against the cops (Albeit not from the feds). They steal them or buy them illegally. Example: the bank robbery a few years ago in LA where the cops had to go to a local gun store to obtain automatic weapons to use against the automatic weapon-armed bank robbers.

What DOES disturb me is the rest of the gear and training the feds are providing (sometimes for FREE). It effectively makes police agencies the EQUIVALENT of the military. Posse Comitatus prevents the use of the military from acting as police officers, and for good reason. It does NOT stop police from acting as the military, and that is one way the feds are “getting around” “Posse Comitatus.” Why are they doing it? Do they EXPECT a revolution? And is this a way of PREPARING for one? There’s a good reason for Posse Comitatus, and arming and training the police agencies as military violates the SPIRIT, if not the actual law. Criminals are not the only people who violate the law. (Guns SaveLife)

Cut Off the Head

Israel is finally doing he reasonable thing: killing off the top “generals” in Hamas, which is the only way they’re going to beat them. Taking out missile firing points won’t do it. They just set up more the next day, in a different school; or hospital, or apartment house. I’m sure Israeli intelligence KNOWS who they are, where they live, where their “offices” are, etc. I’m sure they keep track of their every move. So why they’ve waited this long, I don’t know. Were they hoping for “peace in our time?” It’s not likely with an enemy whose very CHARTER of existence says their main purpose is to “drive Israel into the sea.” Hamas will not stop killing Israelis until THEY are all dead. (Mail Online)

Obama: "Nothing We Can Do About It"

When Obama admits that he is dimly aware of the Islamic terrorist threat, he also admits that he has “no strategy” to stop them, which is a STUPID statement to come from the “commander-in-chief” of the strongest military (so far) in the world, which he is trying valiantly to change. There IS a “strategy” if he will embrace it. That strategy is to go “all out” and kill every Islamic terrorist we can find, as soon as we find them, They have no right to a trial because they would not give one of us that right if they caught them. They should be outlawed as a PHONY “religion” and marked for death, wherever they’re found if they’re caught in the act, That’s what they do to us, and they deserve nothing better. Obama says he “has no strategy” for dealing with them because he doesn’t WANT to deal with them in the way WE wish. He wants them to WIN, and put him in charge of any “caliphate” this created. (Just common sense)

Harry's In Denial

The top Democrat candidate for the Montana Senate seat dropped out of the race amide accusations of plagiarism, and was replaced by a very weak candidate that everybody, including Democrats said was “facing an uphill battle” to beat the Republican candidate. But not to Harry. He says, “We’re in good shape in Montana “ which only shows how completely “out of touch with reality” he is. Harry’s out of touch in a lot of ways, and he keeps illustrating that for us, while he works HARD to discredit ANY Republican candidate, for ANYTHING. He’s not taking any chances. He also keeps telling us that they are not only going to keep control of the Senate, but also gain control of the House, and the presidency. But, Is Harry in for a big surprise on November 8^th! I imagine Nancy is just as blind to reality. She probably thinks she will regain her House predominance again, too. (Daily Caller)

They Never Learn

DC courts have ruled the DC gun ban unconstitutional—again. The anti-gun fools didn’t “get it” the fist time, and they’re not likely to get it this time, either. Look for them to regroup and reorganize and come up with yet ANOTHER unconstitutional anti-gun law. And I hope the courts are as intelligent then as they seem to be, today. The cops can see through all the crap in the news media and they won’t enforce the DC gun ban. But they also know how stupid the anti-gun fools are, and how well entrenched they are with lawmakers who think the same way they do. It takes a real STUPID lawmaker to make laws the cops REFUSE to enforce because they KNOW they will fall before the courts. (Christian Science Monitor) The link is to a publication that is, itself, anti-gun. So when they editorialize, don’t take them too seriously.

Obama Proselyzes for Islam

What the hell he’s thinking of, I don’t know. But hidden in his very short remarks about the beheading of an American journalist is a plea to recognize Islam and join it. How do we defeat this abomination if our own PRESIDENT fails to recognize it for the threat to our life and liberty it is, and keeps on appointing top terrorists to important posts in his GOVERNMENT? Obama seems to be ON THE SIDE of the Islamic terrorists more and more every day. And I believe he has been on their side since BEFORE he conned his way into the presidency. I think he wants them to WIN and is doing everything he can to help them, without exposing his hand to most Americans (who pay no attention to politics, anyway). But his hand HAS been exposed to those of us who DO pay attention. I think Obama is the worst enemy we’ve ever had, and we need to muzzle him and take away his power long before we could have impeached him. (Freedom Outpost)

Bad Laws?

That’s what the Florida Sun-Sentinel thinks of the new Florida laws that keep teachers and other school “officials” from “going off the deep end” and giving children severe punishment for chewing a pop tart into the rough shape of a gun and pointing it at somebody, or just pointing their FINGER at somebody like it was a gun. They don’t like the “stand your ground” law, either. Apparently they think you should “make like a gazelle when confronted by a criminal with his own ILLEGAL gun; IF you can outrun his bullets. Another one they don’t like is the “warning shot” law, so people can take VP Joe Biden’s advice (to fire a warning shot out the window) without being punished. What makes THEM the “arbiter” of what is good law just because they buy printer’s ink by the barrel? (Gun Free Zone)

He Just Can't Help Himself

Obama never learned how to tell the truth. He would tell a lie when the truth would serve better. He tells the lie that “30% of guns are sold without a background check,” which is a BLATANT lie. It is based on a TINY “study” that took place BEFORE the law requiring background checks was signed into law. He knows most people are aware of this, but he tells the lie, anyway. Then he insults those who point out that IS a lie, by calling THEM liars. Like most politicians, he wants to disarm Americans so his thugs will have less trouble when they come after our property  He says, “My biggest frustration has been that this society has not been willing to take some basic steps to keep guns out of the hands of people who can do just unbelievable damage.  We are the only developed country on earth where this happens.” First of all, I dispute that “civilized countries” don’t have good gun laws. But his biggest problem is that anti-gun fools like him aim in the wrong direction when they .make their laws. They go after guns in the hands of honest, reliable people, not those in the hands of criminals, who obey NO laws. (Fox News)

Our War Against Christianity

I never thought I’d see such a thing in this, a Christian country! Teachers BANNING saying, “Bless you!” when somebody sneezes in a classroom. And not only getting AWAY with it, being able to punish the student for objecting! Yet a teacher in a lower school did, and then followed up by saying, “I won’t have you saying ‘Godly things’ in this class!” And she was not only NOT punished, she was backed up by the school! Then the other day, professor Leon Gardner threatened to take 15% off a student’s grade if he so much as mentioned God. And that he would “suffer further punishment from the college.” What if someone told some Muslims the same if they mentioned “Allah?” there’d be a “shooting war” in that school before sundown. If anybody did that to me, I’d slap his/her teeth down his/her throat, right in front of the class. And I’d do the same to any school “official” who tried to back him/her up. The Constitution guarantees freedom of religion, and I DEMAND it. (Campus Reform)

Pushing Racism

Now they’re stretching everything they can to call it “racism.” Now, people who only date people of their own race are racists, according to a writer for “Slate,” a well-known LIBERAL Internet rag. Only dating people of a DIFFERENT race is ALSO racist, according to a feminist magazine nobody has ever heard of. Ya can’t win for losing! Apparently they want to FORCE people to date people of ALL races to avoid being CALLED racist. Apparently, the term used for a Mississippi college (Ol’ Miss) is racist, and that’s according to some of its own administrators. It’s because that term was used “once upon a time” to refer to a slave owner’s wife. Damn! They’re really reaching! And then New York Education Commissioner John King called people who opposed “Common Core,” that useless educational program, racist. Again; anybody disagreeing with them are “racist.” Apparently being against gay marriage is racist, too! I guess the liberals have found something they can really get into to promote their “flights of fancy.” If you object, you’re a racist.  Race relations are now worse than they were in the fifties, largely because of Obama PUSHING the “race issue” by accusing anybody who disagreed with him of being racist. And he said if we elected him it would forever get rid of the “race issue.” Another of his LIES. (The Daily Caller)

Comparing Gun Control Fools to Nazis

Venture Capitalist Nick Hanauer talks about “gun control,” promoting it. “Hanauer talks about his family, and they’re from Germany. They had a pillow manufacturer in Germany. And in one of the last paragraphs he talks about his family being run out of Germany by the Nazis. It’s like [slapping noise; laughter]. How stupid can they – you know? Now he’s funding, he’s put half a million dollars, toward this policy, the same policy that led to his family getting run out or Germany by the Nazis. You know, it’s staggering to me, it’s just, you can’t make this stuff up. That these people, its like any Jewish people I meet who are anti-gun, I think, “are you serious? Do you not remember what happened?” And why did that happen? Because they registered guns and then they took them. And now you’re supporting gun con – you come to this country and you support gun control? Why did you have to flee to this country in the first place? Hello! Is anybody home here? It’s just—I don’t know.” He’s like many people who have been the victims of people wielding ILLEGAL guns. They think denying HONEST people the right to have guns for protection will somehow keep CRIMINALS (who obey NO laws) from having guns. Nazi Germany relied on this kind of person to “get rid of guns” in Germany, and then they went out and took (stole) the guns before killing millions of people (mostly Jews). People like Hanauer don’t understand that disarming the populace LEADS to murder BY the government—and that’s the direction in which we’re heading, now. He just doesn’t understand that NRA people are trying to keep him from suffering the same fate, again. (The Stranger)

It's Not "Free Trade"

People today like to blame “free trade” on the loss of manufacturing jobs and the general malaise in this economy, but that only arises from their own INCOMPETENCE. It is the tight regulations, coupled with the rest of Obama’s meddling in the economy and spending more money than there IS that is “strangling” our economy. And as long as incompetents like Obama and the people he appoints are in charge, we will continue to lose in the world market. Trading with the rest of the world is NOT the “culprit,” and never will be. Those who think so are incompetent, and this is at the BASE of their incompetence. Just as collectivists blame “capitalism” for our troubles, THEY are incompetent, and believing in collectivism is at the BASE of their ignorance and incompetence. Collectivism is BASED on STEALING from those able to PRODUCE, and GIVING to those incapable or unwilling to produce. (American Thinker)

They Never Learn

This is one of the dumbest things I’ve ever heard—except for something Nancy Peelosi or Harry Reid might say on any given day. That’s only a fairly close quote from this article, but it truly describes a store that put up “No Guns Allowed” signs AFTER a legally armed CUSTOMER used his gun to stop a robber from stabbing the store’s manager without a shot being fired. AFTER the stabbings, and the intervention of the LEGALLY armed customer, they posted signs that said, “No Guns allowed,” thinking, no doubt, that SIGNS would deter armed criminals. If those signs had been in place BEFORE the stabbing, that store manager would no doubt be “pushing up daisies” now, instead of posting stupid signs for his boss. If I were him, I’d be looking for a different job, where the employers had some sense. (Last Resistance)

Next Gun Control Push

t’s going to be coupled with “the woman’s rights” issue. Of course, that’s a phony issue Obama made up so he could further limit your rights. When Obama’s anti-gun laws failed last year, it was NOT Republicans that killed it; it was DEMOCRATS voting against it. The anti-gun fools (Obama among them) fail and fail, time after time, and STILL they don’t “tumble” to the fact that Americans do not WANT their kind of “gun control.” But does that stop them—or even slow them down? NO; they have people being paid big bucks too sit in darkened rooms finding new ways to limit our right to be armed in our own self-defense. And they’re worth the money to them. They’re always coming up with new scams and connecting it to “women’s rights” is the latest scam. The con is “keeping guns out of the hands of abusers.” But once the law is made, they don’t limit it to REAL abusers; they create their own “abusers” by using a very WIDE definition of just what abuse really IS. (Cowboy Byte)

Kissing Muslim Behind

I’ve noticed it a lot lately. Some Muslim complains and people RUSH to make him/her happy. If I, a NON-Muslim, were offended by something, as I am in this instance, they would “blow me off.” This instance is the word “bacon” on a restaurant sign. Why should WE, who are NOT offended by the word “bacon” (and this is OUR country), remove that word from a sign because it “offends” ONE Muslim? That offends ME! We spend way too much time kissing the butts of Muslims today. Is it because there’s always the implied threat of violence behind their complaints? Are people AFRAID of Muslims? As a matter of fact, I LIKE bacon. If that makes a Muslim mad, he (or she) should just “get used to it.” This is OUR country, and we make the rules here. Muslims can take their objections and shove them where they want us to kiss. (The Blaze)

Trying to Take His Gun

TRYING TO TAKE HIS GUN: Well, we finally got to hear what the cop who shot and killed the “gentle giant” in Ferguson, MO says about the encounter. He says he was trying to get Brown to stop walking in the middle of the street when Brown jumped into his car and tried to take his gun. He figured Brown was trying to kill him so he shot him. From what he said, Brown kept coming toward him as he shot, so he kept shooting until Brown stopped. Unfortunately (for Brown), by that time, Brown was dead. Maybe that’s true, and maybe it’s not. But I can’t think of a reason for the cop to lie about it, and I CAN think of a reason for the “witness” (who was Brown’s accomplice in the convenience store robbery), who said Brown had his hands up, to lie. When you’re a BIG guy, beating the hell out of a cop trying to do his duty right after you have robbed a store, you might expect to get shot. And if you “keep coming” after BEING shot, you can expect him to keep shooting. (Time Magazine)

DUI Repeat Offender

Scott Peter St. Pierre was sent to prison for ten years after killing a corrections officer on his way to work at 9:25 AM. It was his SECOND DUI. Now, ten years later, after serving his sentence, he’s up to his old tricks again. He was driving drunk and being chased by the cops when he crashed into another driver and was arrested. Which brings up another question: his earlier conviction was for a death during his SECOND DUI. Why wasn’t something done to stop him from driving, period? I read, all the time, about people who kill others while driving drunk, and many of them have had NUMEROUS DUIs, with minimal punishment. Why is this? Are the cops (or the “system”) AFRAID to “unduly punish” these people? What can be done to make sure people who constantly drive while drunk keep getting their DUIs without appreciable punishment? I think the punishment ought to be cumulative. Stiff fine and imprisonment for the first time, an even stiffer fine and longer imprisonment for the second time, etc., each time they get caught a stiffer fine and even longer imprisonment, until they get LIFE in prison. Further, if they KILL someone ANY time, they should get LIFE. (Sacramento Bee)

What Would Brown Do?

Many people just don’t believe that Michael Brown would attack a cop who is telling him to get out of the middle of the road minutes after he (Brown) had committed a strong-arm robbery of a convenience store (which has been PROVED). They maintain (falsely) that he was just a typical teenager, dancing down (the middle of) the street, all excited by his upcoming entry into college. I don’t believe that for a minute, considering his size, how he “walked all over” that clerk, and the fact that he was walking down the MIDDLE of the street. That shows me a complete disdain for other people’s rights that sometimes comes with being so big. I think he was USED TO just TAKING what he wanted, and that there is a record of it, somewhere, even if they won’t reveal it. It WILL come out before it’s over. He didn’t know the cop didn’t know about his crime and I think he attacked the cop to keep from being arrested.

The cop, like most people, being smaller than he was, after Brown had beat him severely and tried to take his gun, used the only thing he could to overcome this behemoth who was trying to kill him. He shot him, and as he was taught, kept shooting until Brown went down. I don’t believe for a minute that Brown was “giving up,” and had his hands in the air, something testified to by ONE witness, who was his ACCOMPLICE, and denied by twelve other witnesses. Why the neighborhood “chimed in” and agreed with that ONE witness, instead of the other twelve, I don’t know. I DO know why people like Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson did. That’s how they make their money, making possible race situations WORSE. Many others with similar motives (looting) rushed to Ferguson, too. Even thugs with GUNS, shooting their way into closed and locked stores. (Just common sense)

Why Don't They Mention Race?

When the liberal media “reported” that, “cops shoot an unarmed black man in St. Louis suburb,: they went out of their way to mention the race of the “victim.” In reports about black CRIMINALS committing CRIMES, they never mention the race of the criminals. Why is that? Do they WANT to promote the race tensions that promotes? In all the reports about the thugs who practice the “knockout game,” they never mention that, in just about every case, the thug who walks up and slugs an innocent person and runs away is black. They seem to want to HIDE the participation of blacks (NOT “African-Americans), as CRIMINALS, in crimes. Now why would they want to do that? Do they just want to help Obama create the FICTION that whites are still victimizing blacks? I don’t know; but it does make me wonder. (Patriot Action Network)

It's All Obama's Fault!

If you want to see just ONE result of Obama “ending Bush’s war in Iraq,” just look at the picture at the bottom of the page linked below. The picture shows the headless body of a small girl child wearing a pretty dress. The other picture shows her father holding her headless body, no doubt vowing DEATH to the Islamic thugs who did this atrocity. The fact that this is just ONE of the ATROCITIES committed by ISIS CRIMINALS makes me physically ILL. The other thing that makes me want to “toss my cookies” is the unalterable FACT that these atrocities were ORDAINED by Obama’s act in ordering American troops to “cut and run” from Iraq so he could “claim” victory. THOUSANDS of innocent CHILDREN have been bloodily MURDERED by ISIS goons. The beheading of a small child can NEVER be described as “the perils of war.” This atrocity was premeditated and committed by heartless MORONS who LIKE to kill, especially CHILDREN (those they don’t delight in screwing, that is). This is not war, it is CRIME. And these fools need to be punished for it, even if it means shooting them on sight, in a place that guarantees a slow, and painful death. I’m just sorry I’m too old and “busted up” to go and kill a few, myself. (American Thinker)

Holder Isn't Impressed

\He has been heard to say that the contempt of congress charges against him don’t bother him, overmuch.” He doesn’t take them too seriously. When saying that, he revealed his arrogance and complete disdain for Congress. Now a judge (who apparently DOES take Congress’ action seriously) has ordered Holder and the DOJ to turn over “privilege” documents he refused to turn over previously because he thought he didn’t have to. But he DOES. If he refuses to take this order seriously, he may just learn how serious it is. Holder apparently thinks he is above the law, and it seems like Obama agrees with him. Somebody needs to convince these damned fool CRIMINALS they AREN’T above the law. This president has violated the law more often than I can remember any other president doing—and as long as Congress is so “compliant,” he will continue to get away with it. (The Blaze)

Onama's War Against Guns

I’ve written about Obama’s attempt to put gun people out of business by “pressuring” banks and lending institutions to stop lending them money. But I didn’t think he’d go so far as to refuse them the right to a bank account, just because “some people disapprove of them.” But Morris Williams, owner of Inman Gun & Pawn, in S. Carolina recently received a letter from Sun Trust Bank telling him that “because of banking rules and regulations,” he must close his accounts because he is running a business that has been “deemed” a “prohibited business.” They don’t say under what “rules and regulations” they demand this, nor did they tell him in just what way he was “running a prohibited business,” and WHO was prohibiting it. The only thing he can think of is that he sells GUNS. This is one of the most underhanded usurpations of power I’ve ever seen. It’s low, even for OBAMA. (Daily Caller)

Stupid Democrats!

Giovanni Hashimoto (what an amazing combination of names!) recently wrote an article supporting Israel in their war with the Palestinians that sparked opposing comments from other Democrats, who likened Israels to NAZIS for defending themselves. They wrote that Israel (Israel?) was “creating a genocide comparable to the Holocaust.” What? Can they BE that STUPID? Not a PEEP about Palestinians rocket bombing Israel’s tightly populated CIVILIAN areas. Not a WORD about the REASONS for Israel’s RESPONSE to that daily bombing. Do these people take daily STUPID PILLS? They SAY you “cant [sic] both understand this conflict and support Israel and be a good person.” Aside from the many grammatical and spelling errors, this is about the WORST example of MIS-understanding of a conflict there has ever been. His guy isn’t too bright, and he proves it here. But then, we know that about most Democrats, don’t we? Not Democrat voters (they’re just misguided by people like this). And this kind of FOOL is running this country. Woe is us! (Campus Reform)

Yet Another Autopsy

I wonder how many more autopsies they’re going to do, searching for SOMETHING to make that “gentle giant” into an “innocent kid.” There were THREE autopsies of the “gentle giant” who was assaulting the cop who tried to stop him from walking in the center of the street after he had strong-arm robbed a convenience store for a pack of cigars. They tried to make us think he was just a kid all excited about college, dancing up the street. Then came up the video of him bullying the clerk in the store, whose head came up to about his belly button and they had to change the narrative. Obama wanted that video suppressed, so he had Holder refuse to let locals release it. But it got released, anyway. So they did another autopsy, hoping to find SOMETHING they can twist into something to damn the cop. But that didn’t work, either.

So yet ANOTHER autopsy was planned. That boy in a man’s body must look like he was in a massive pileup by now, with his organs in jars all over the autopsy room. They tried to say one of the bullets was fired from the back, but the coroner wouldn’t cooperate, saying it was POSSIBLE, but not probable. Why they’re doing this, I don’t know. Maybe it was a ploy to inflame the “race issue” yet again, as the Treyvon Martin case did, Obviously, that’s why Obama got involved. The cop didn’t know he had just strong-armed a convenience store clerk, but HE did. And being accosted by a cop right after, he KNEW, in his mind, he was in “big trouble,” so he tried to beat up the cop, who was half his size. It had worked on the convenience store owner, why not on the cop? But the convenience store owner didn’t have a gun, and know how to use it. The cop did. Oops! (Fox 2 Now)

Who IS Mike Brown?

It seems to me that we know absolutely nothing about Michael Brown, the “victim” in the police shooting in Ferguson, MO. In most cases, within a couple of days, SOMEBODY in the news media (Fox, if nobody else) gives us “chapter and verse” on the “life and times” of the central figure in the story. There has been no such effort in the case of the death of Michael Brown. The way he “strong-armed” that store clerk while stealing a pack of cigars (testified to by his accomplice, who ultimately admitted his lie), tells me he was used to doing such things, using his “bigness” to intimidate people and “running roughshod” over people. If so, there should be some “intel” about it, somewhere. SOMEBODY knows about it if he has done things like this before. In one picture he is shown flashing some “gang signs.” WAS he a gang member? Was he used to doing things like this “strong-arm” robbery of a convenience store, bullying people smaller than him? SOMETHING will be there to find out. So why doesn’t some “intrepid reporter” go out and find it? Maybe most of them just aren’t interested in what they might find, or Fox just didn’t think about it. Is the uproar about his death originated by his fellow gang members if he IS a member of a game? (Just common sense)

Just Two Remain

Three guys went into a home in Indianapolis, hoping to score big. They did, but not in the way they had planned for this home invasion. Inside were two well-trained and well-armed men, who knew how to repel invaders. There are now only two left in this gang as they “ran for the hills.” They haven’t been seen or heard from since. The third member of their gang is dead at the scene. Once again, guns in the hands of HONEST people stopped a crime and took at least one criminal off the streets, putting him in a cemetery. That’s the price you pay if you screw up, as these ill-trained gun bearers did when they invaded this home. They didn’t do their homework, and one of them died. It’s a good start. (Guns Save Life)

BIG Mistake!

Terrorists in Iraq made a BIG mistake when they started beheading children, and another when they started kidnapping and beheading journalists. They wanted to make us mad, and HAVE they! It may be a fatal mistake for them, because it took them out of the “freedom fighter” category and placed them squarely in the “murdering thug” category, and Americans have never been known to “back off” against such people. We’re “coming back,” folks. And we’re coming with all guns blazing. They think they’re going to give us “rivers of blood,” and they’re right. But it’s going to be THEIR blood. Obama may TRY to “limit” what our soldiers can do, but I predict that’s going to be impossible. They’re going to go over there and “whip up” on those fifth century fools. If any are left alive it will be because they were hiding too well. Any we can find are going to DIE. We will find most of them, and it will be a horrible death. Terrorists think our air strikes are bad for them, but wait until they meet up with ANGRY American soldiers who will not be deterred by “rules of engagement” and will follow them to their “nests.” NO longer will they be able to escape death by throwing down their arms when they meet up with a superior force. They will NOT be sent to GITMO and eventually released by our stupid president. They will be shot on sight.  I just wish I was not “old and broken” so I could go over and kill a few. Every single one of them needs to DIE. (Town Hall)

"Not Black"

Is that how they’re going to refer to the unarmed white teenager a cop shot in Salt Lake City, Utah, the other day? They refer to the cop who shot him as “not white.” When did it become a sin to say a man is “black” or “white?” Are they trying to hide the fact that a “nonwhite” cop shot a “not black” unarmed teenager? Do they know how that sounds when circumstances between the two shootings are so similar? They ARE different, though. That “not black” teenager in SLC had not just come from a strong-arm robbery. He was just “diddy-bopping” down the 7-11 parking lot listening to his “tunes” and the cop put a gun in his face and told him to “get on the ground!” Having his “tunes” up loud, as teenagers do, he couldn’t hear him, so he didn’t INSTANTLY “drop to the ground,” so the cop “blew him way.” Meanwhile, the “authorities” refuse to talk about the race of either party, while those in Ferguson EMPHASIZE the “race factor.” There’s something SYSTEMICALLY wrong, here. (World Net Daily)

Stealing Elections

If a Democrat loses an election. It MUST be voter fraud—at least, according to them. But if a Republican loses one by vote fraud, Democrats call him a “sore loser.” This was perfectly illustrated in the election AlGore lost. They tried to “move Heaven and Earth to reverse what was plainly an honest election. Then, when it was certified to be honest, they tried to “move the goal posts” by complaining that Bush LOST the general vote, but WON the Electoral College vote, and that was wrong—because THEY lost. That’s how it has been done, by LAW, since the beginning. But if a DEMOCRAT won that way, they’d shrug their shoulders and say, “it is what it is,” so just accept it. It’s happening now in the election between Thad Cochran and Chris McDaniel. There is incontrovertible PROOF Cochran STOLE the election, but they don’t expect that to change things. They’re so frightened of the Tea Parties that they’ll do ANYTHING to keep a Tea Party-backed candidate from winning. Both parties work TOGETHER to keep Tea Party candidates out of office. And that’s a hard combination to beat. (Last Resistance)

Cop Shoots Unarmed White Kid

And nobody does anything. No rioting, no looting, no visits by the governor or the attorney general of the United States, no visits by Al Sharpton or Jesse Jackson, nothing. Oh, the cop who shot him is described as “other than white.” We don’t know if he’s black, or Philipino, Indian (oh, forgot: ¨native American”) or maybe INDIAN Indian, or maybe Hindu, or even Muslim. I don’t know. They won’t tell us who he is. There’s no “governmental lynch mob” demanding his scalp. What’s the difference between this and what’s happening in Ferguson, MO? The victim is white, and the cop is “other than white.” This guy was shot dead because he didn’t instantly obey the cop’s commands (he was wearing earphones and couldn’t hear him). Cops will not say whether or not there was a gun (besides the cop’s) on the kid or near him, along with not revealing the murderer—er. uh, cop’s name. This case is more clear-cut than Ferguson, but apparently nobody cares (except his brother, who witnessed it) about an unarmed white kid being killed by an “:other than white” cop. In the story, there wasn’t a single mention of race. Mostly because the victim was white, I guess, and the shooter was “other than white.” (Inquisitr)

Government Lynching

That’s plainly what’s going on in Ferguson, MO. A cop who has NO record of racism defends himself against a “small-time hood” who uses his size to “run roughshod” over other people, just TAKING whatever he wanted by INTIMIDATING people until he ran into a cop who refused to be intimidated, and shot him after he tried to beat the cop’s head in. People (mostly people who didn’t live there, but flew in quickly) rioted on the basis of what ONE guy (who was Brown’s ACCOMPLICE) said about what happened (and against TWELVE witnesses who said he was doing his duty), and are now calling for the INDICTMENT of this cop, who was only doing his duty and defending himself. Even the GOVERNOR of the state (Nixon) is calling for an indictment, PREJUDGING things way before all the facts are in. The Attorney General of the United States (himself a criminal) comes in to “investigate” the case and will no doubt “chime in” on the calls for the “head” of this cop. That’s funny: a CRIMINAL investigating a COP! You’re a “dead man” when a criminal, who sits at the “right hand” of the PRESIDENT calls for your punishment for doing your duty. (Just common sense)

Reich Criticizing "the Rich"

Robert Reich, once the Labor Secretary (under Clinton), is well known for his criticism of rich people. People who are still earning their riches, of course. He never utters a peep about “old money” inheritors who have never done a real day of work in their lives and never worry about where their next meal is coming from, is today making (not “earning”) $242,613.00 a year ($20,217.00 a month) for teaching—wait for it—ONE class. Next year, he’ll be teaching four classes, and they will probably increase his salary accordingly. He talks big about “income equality,” but doesn’t practice it much. How many of YOU earn $20,000.00 a month? (If you do, he will criticize you.) Apparently he doesn’t practice what he preaches, getting this kind of money for ONE class in a tax supported (of course) college.

Guys like Reich always “land well” after their stint in government. He probably steered a lot of money (above or below he table) toward this college when he was in Clinton’s administration. Take a look at just about EVERY former government official and you’ll find somebody with a cushy job, working for the very people he/she “regulated” when in office. It’s routine. In 2013, he made a “fiery” speech to an “occupy” group, saying the Tea Parties were out to destroy the government and make Americans fearful and angry toward one another. Typical liberal fare that lies through their teeth. What the Tea Parties want is to get rid of people like him and take back our country from liberals, who seem to have a strangle hold on our government today. They want to free us from fools like him. (The Daily Caller)

Funny: I didn't Hear That!

I listened to every word spoken in the press conference by those who performed the second autopsy on Michael Brown, and it was NOT said that Brown was shot “from back to front.” Want WAS said was that it was “theoretically POSSIBLE” that he COULD have been shot from the back to the front at ONE TIME during the shooting. Nothing equivocal. When a man is being shot several times sometimes he “spins around” in place and SOME of the bullets enter from the rear. That does NOT mean he was “shot in the back.” This sounds to me like the kid’s family trying to twist the findings to CRIMINALIZE the cop. What I saw was a BIG thug terrorizing the people in the convenience store, attacking a cop when he thought he had been “caught,” and getting shot for his trouble. I think they need to take a LOT more time to analyze what happened in Ferguson, MO and stop “leaping to conclusions” and giving the “out-of-state” thugs who are making the demonstrations violent, ammunition. They’re giving Obama more ammunition for his drive to worsen race relations in this country, too. (Daily Caller)

Perry's Indictment "Sketchy"

The effort to CRIMINALIZE Texas Gov. Perry’s action to get rid of a drunken prosecutor is even being called “sketchy” by some DEMOCRATS (liberals), which is a “weasel word” for BOGUS. Among them are David Axelrod, who was a top political advisor to Bill Clinton. Republicans are a bit more definite in describing it as a “political witch-hunt.” Notice the people pushing the “indictment” are Democrats, who hate Perry with a passion, since he has hurt their shenanigans many times. This is a major effort to discredit Perry in the future, particularly in 2016 as he runs for president, again. Perry being president is obviously a “bitter pill” for them to swallow and this is a “shot across his bow.” Any news story about him from now on will contain the words, “indicted former governor,” even if the charges are thrown out as silly; which they will be, unless it comes before a wildly Democrat judge. (Daily Caller)

Cops Overreact

In Armada, MI, a local teenage girl was murdered, which instigated a massive “investigation” that included violating the civil rights of everybody on the roads around the town. Cops set up roadblocks in three places, effectively blockading the entire town. Stopping and questioning EVERY person they could find about their destination, where they came from, etc, writing it all down, and holding up traffic for hours. This is a good example of cops using a dastardly crime as an EXCUSE to violate everybody’s rights. Worse, I suspect they didn’t come up with anything concrete from these roadblocks after wasting everybody’s time and money while stepping on their right of movement. This action came an entire WEEK after the girl’s body was found, after the murderer had ample time to be elsewhere. (PoliceState, USA)

It's A Police State

I have nothing against the cops—as long as they do their duty to PROTECT us and do not look at us as “the enemy.” I’ve been watching with trepidation as the federal government pushed all kinds of WARFARE equipment onto local cops, sometimes in the smallest of communities—and sometimes FREE. The latest evidence of police overdoing it is in Ferguson, MO, where (I believe) a cop shot a giant thug in self defense (a “witness” said Brown was standing with his hands up, but the “witness” was his accomplice in the earlier robbery), but the “locals” got all bent out of shape and started to riot. Instead of doing all they could to AVOID violence, the cops came in with all guns blazing, using all their federally supplied military gear, looking like the “storm troopers” they are, shooting tear gas and flash-bang grenades and rubber bullets (that CAN kill) into a crowd of innocent civilians, acting like an invading army. And I think that’s what it is. Obama thinks he sees the strong possibility of a revolution brewing and, since the “Posse Comitatus” prevents him from using the military against American citizens, he’s turning the police agencies of America into an army who will be able to “legally” repulse American citizens if they revolt. Count on it: if there’s a way to “get around the Constitution,” Obama will do it—or at least, try it. (Claire Wolf) This was originally published on JPFO web site, but I think we crashed their server. This is only part of it, but there’s a link to the rest, and it may be back up by the time you get to it.

Vacation From Vacation

Only Obama has to “take a break” from his vacations. That’s what he’s doing tight now as “air strikes on Iraq and violence in Ferguson, MO intruded on his golf and beach plans.” Poor baby! It is suspected he did this so “spike criticism” of his “being on vacation” during multiple crises,” but that’s the last thing I would do. His presence in Washington would not make much of a difference because he knows not what to do in either case. I’d just as soon he REMAIN “on vacation” if that meant he was not “fiddling with” my freedom and money. I’d never criticize him for staying away from Washington if he weren’t spending millions of dollars of MY MONEY to do it, and if he didn’t spend a lot of that money for communications so he could still DO some “fiddling” while on vacation. A more INCOMPETENT president I don’t think I’ve ever seen, so the more he is on vacation, the better, in my estimation. (Mail Online)

Australia Solved Immigration Problem

It was easy. The previous administration WELCOMED illegal aliens, gave them food and shelter, even cell phones. And that resulted in a flood of illegals coming in to take advantage of their “generous” welfare system. Australians got tired of the “line jumpers” and threw out the previous administration. Now they no longer welcome them, and even fly them home free. That costs some money, but not nearly as much as ACCOMMODATING the illegals previously did. We could similarly solve that problem by doing the same thing. But we will have to get RID of Obama and his accomplices before we could. Obama has CREATED the “illegal immigration” problem we now have by WELCOMING them, as did the previous Australian administration. Yes, Bush did something similar, but not nearly so much. Obama has “gone nuts” with it. (World Net Daily)

Making War on Children!

What will it take to make people “rise up in anger” and kill every Islamic terrorist they see? They’re so used to the unspeakable atrocities committed by Muslim extremists (I think) that they’re now inured to it, or they’re just afraid. You see a picture of a headless corpse of a small girl in a pretty blue dress, a pile of dead CHILDREN on the stone-strewn ground, and the half a body of a five-year-old cut in HALF by an Islamic terrorist. Does this kind of thing infuriate “average” Muslims? Does this make them angry enough to kill the murdering bastards who commit such crimes? Apparently not. They come and go among the Muslim population who allow them to use them as human targets and murder their children, rape their wives and daughters (no matter how young), and kill whole families. Why? Because they don’t BELIEVE the exact same way they do. NO other reason. I’m getting to the point where I can’t differentiate between innocent Muslims and these bastards. I just want to KILL them. Sorry about the language, but I can’t find any other words harsh enough to describe them. And Obama is sending them BILLIONS of OUR dollars! Thank God I’m no longer subject to the censorship Town Hall put on me when I published The New THOMA$ REPORT on Town Hall.. (World Net Daily)

"Enroll No Veterans"

That’s what University of Phoenix was told by California bureaucrats. They were told that they had “exceeded their quota of veterans” enrolled, and could enroll no more. This, in AMERICA! The “land of the free and home of the brave” now discriminates against VETERANS! Under the LAW! I presume there is SOME KIND of a LAW involved, but I don’t know. The way Obama’s government operates, that’s not sure. If he wants to do something, he just DOES IT, laws or not. Frankly, I don’t think such a law exists, because what member of Congress would MAKE such a law? Maybe Obama “used his pen” to make a REGULATION to cover it. And don’t tell me because it is a STATE action, Obama is not involved. Many times in the past have STATE ACTIONS been prompted by something Obama wanted. (University of Phoenix)

"View" Panelists Gun Promoters?

Three of four panelists on “The View” the other day said that women should get themselves a gun for self defense, The only dissenter was Lara Spencer, visiting from “Good Morning America.” I notice Whoopi Goldberg was conspicuous by her absence this day. Maybe she just didn’t want any part of the subject matter to be discussed and took the day off. Whoopi (whose name reminds me of breaking wind) is a real “firebrand” and is KNOWN for her anti-gun sentiments. So maybe that was a good move on her part. I’m surprised the producers of that ultra-liberal show would let this on the air. Maybe they wanted to make us think they were “fair and balanced,” which they are NOT. (Media Research Center) Sorry: apparently this was "taken down" before I could use it.

And...Heeere's Jesse!

I wondered, the other day, where Jesse Jackson was in the Ferguson, MO contretemps, and here he is! Now calling the death of Ferguson thug a “state execution.” Better late than never, I guess. That description would not hold if you consider that “state executions” do not include the executee beating the hell out of a cop when he’s twice his size, and the cop is alone. That picture of the store owner confronting this thieving bully was funny, in a way. It didn’t even slow this giant down as he “stiff-armed” the owner as he pushed his way out of the store with his “loot.” HE knew the cop was likely there to arrest him for that strong-arm robbery, though the cop was not yet aware of it. So he started beating the hell out of him, before he even was able to exit his vehicle. He was lucky the shot fired IN the car didn’t “do for him.” But he continued to menace the cop, who was not yet joined by his brother officers, and who shot in defense of his own life. Now they want the death penalty for that cop. So all his friends (and all the outside race-whores) came in and looted everyone, including the store this kid had robbed. It was a riot CREATED by them, as well as military-style cops who arrived and overreacted. The outside looters are still looting, without police opposition. (Politico)

Russia to Retaliate

America, and other countries have laid on many sanctions to Russia for their actions in Ukraine, which led to the downing of a civilian airliner and the killing of 295 innocent people. Now Russia has promised “retaliatory measures” in response. But Russia doesn’t have the resources to hurt any of those countries in any major way. The only countries he can hurt are those already in his sphere of influence. Putin is running a bluff. Russia is not nearly as strong today as it was at the height of the “cold war,” and their “retaliatory measures” aren’t going to do them much good. Any such measures will elicit a similar response, which will CRIPPLE Russia. Putin has his chest pumped up BIG, but it’s just not big enough, any more. (Just common sense)

Doctors Asking About Guns

That’s one of the more insidious things in Obamacare. One of the things Nancy Peelosi said we’d have to vote the act into law to “find out what’s in it.” Giving DOCTORS orders to question patients about their gun ownership. And if the doctors disobey, they can probably be disciplined. The same way they’re forced to tell “authorities” about possible child abuse in their young patients, if they have ANY suspicion it might be there, even if they don’t think it is. That’s so CPS can then harass the parents unmercifully, as they’re wont to do. For my part, if my doctor asked me about guns, I’d tell him to “screw off” and if he insisted, I’d get a new doctor. (Breitbart)

ISIS: Next Target, America!

Boy, is this insignificant outfit thinking big! It’s like a gnat crawling up an elephant’s leg with rape on its mind. Yes, they’re “successful” as long as they’re fighting people who don’t know how to fight, nor know how to use the equipment we left.. But if they DO invade America, they’re going to get a big surprise. Americans know how to fight, and if they’re invading the mainland, Obama will have no choice but to turn our troops loose, which he has not done so far. He’s been “playing at” war. But when our troops are “turned loose” to fight the way they know how to do, these fifth century fools will not have a chance. They’ll go down in a big heap of dead bodies, and they deserve it. Yes, they have figured out how to EMULATE us in the use of OUR equipment (that we left when that Obama fool made us leave before we finished the job). But when it comes to ORIGINATING such equipment, they have no idea. And they can only PRETEND to know how to USE it. That’s not enough. If they invade America, they’re gonna get their noses bloodied, big time. (All Arabiya News)

Death Sentence Called For?

Many people who have never themselves been confronted by a criminal in their own homes ask the question: “Is burglary a death sentence case?” Which shows a certain ignorance of reality. When confronted by a criminal, you don’t have a chance to poll him on his intentions. You can’t ask him if he plans to kill you to cover up his crime. You have only the time it takes to RESPOND to his invasion of your home. If that response it to shoot him, so be it. You don’t know whether or not he has a gun. If he dies from your shot, so be it. You didn’t break into HIS house. That’s what “castle” law is all about. Your home is your “castle” and you are entitled to use deadly force to defend it. If local laws say otherwise, they’re WRONG. In this case, the homeowner shot this woman in the back as she was running away. The “Castle Doctrine” ENDS when there is no longer a threat, as in this case. So in this case, it does not apply. This WAS first-degree murder. Responsible gun use MUST recognize this. You CAN’T kill someone just because he/she broke into your house after the threat is gone, as this man did. Of course, any jail sentence would likely be a death sentence, for him. That’s HIS fault. (The Sun)

New Rules for Terrorists

Obama has just quietly rewritten the “rules” for identifying terrorists for his “watch list” to allow names to be added on only a “reasonable suspicion” they are terrorists, the LOWEST possible level for action, below even “probable cause,” the level required for cops to make an arrest. This is not done to make it easier to identify TERRORISTS. It’s done to make it easier for Obama to LABEL innocent people as terrorists to stop them from criticizing HIM and allowing him to CALL them terrorists to blunt their criticisms. “A 166-page document obtained by Intercept titled “March 2013 Watchlisting Guidance” was issued last year by the National Counterterrorism Center. It identifies for the first time the government’s secret rules for placing people on its main terrorist database, as well as the no-fly list and the selectee list, which triggers enhanced screening at airports and border crossings. The federal government shares its watch list data with local law enforcement, foreign governments and “private entities,” Intercept reported.” (World NetDaily)

Is Islam A REAL Religion?

Not even! Islam was born in the pipe dreams of Muhammed Ishmael in Mecca, who fled to Medina, to escape “unbelievers” in his fledging “religion, where he declared that the “god” he selected from among the many worshipped by others (sometimes one for each day) and declared Allah to be “the one true God.” He claimed that Allah spoke to him, and people actually BELIEVED this crap. In Medina, he became a bandit leader, murdering “non-believers” in his new “religion” by the hundreds, even thousands. He wrote in the Koran (however they spell it today) that all good Muslims should “smite” (kill) unbelievers; some less educated (or less truthful) Muslims say the root of Islam is al-Salaam, which means “peace.” But its root is really al-Silm, which means “surrender,” or “submission.” This entire “religion” is based on the MURDER of EVERYBODY who does not believe in it.

Most of today’s Muslims don’t buy that, but to believe in this “religion” founded by a criminal and bandit leader shows a certain lack of intelligence, which is FOSTERED by Imams (especially in women), as a way to keep people from realizing this. There are two basic kinds of Muslims. Those who follow most of Muhammed’s scam without believing they should really KILL “unbelievers” today, and those who believe that killing unbelievers is ordained by Allah and that, should they be killed while doing it, they will be rewarded in “Paradise” by being able to have sex with “virgins” for all of eternity with the “virgins” somehow not becoming non-virgins in the process. Notice that doesn’t apply to women, who are mere “chattel” to Muslim men. The Muslim “religion” should be BANNED everywhere because it is a “band of murderers” who are killing innocents all over the world, beheading CHILDREN, who cannot hurt them militarily, just because they do not believe in Islam, and raping their mothers in front of the family before killing THEM..

Obama once said, “I thank Muslim Americans for their many achievements and contributions to building the very fabric of our nation and strengthening the core of our democracy.” How STUPID is that for our president to say in the face of the obvious FACT that Muslims have always fought AGAINST democracy in any form. This shows a certain IGNORANCE on Obama’s part, or at least an effort to FOOL us about Islam. Frankly, I believe Obama is a “closet Muslim” and wants to do everything he can to advance “Jihad” while CLAIMING to be a Christian. He was brought up by Muslims, educated as a Muslim in a Muslim society. How could he NOT be a “believer?” I don’t know where he was physically BORN, but he lived his formative years in a Muslim country, being taught by Muslims. (Patriot Action Network)

Anti-Israel Bias?

Joan Rivers recently gave CNN hell for being “biased” against Israel. Which is a surprise, considering other rants for which she is known. CNN IS biased against Israel, as is just about ALL the liberal media. They talk endlessly about the “innocents” that are killed in Israel’s strikes in RETALIATION for the HAMAS’ unwarranted rocket bombing of civilian areas, which were saved from killing too many children only by their lousy aim. One batty woman on TV gave all media hell for not having a Palestinian spokesman on when they have Netanyahu on all the time. I know the answer to that one: anything a Palestinian would say would be a LIE. And we don’t need to hear more lies. We get enough of them from Obama and his thugs. Even though I don’t agree with Rivers on much, I agree with her on this. She’s “right as rain.” Why the liberal media has chosen to lie about Israel, I don’t know. I just know they do. And do it continually. (Last Resistance)

Obama Begging to Be Impeached

Rep. Steve Stockman, (R-TX), after visiting the Texas border with Mexico and, seeing for himself what Obama is doing there, thinks Obama is ready to process 5 million illegal alien CHILDREN into the United States. He said “Obama is BEGGING to be impeached, as a means to “energize” the Democrat voters. He thinks if he finishes his term, it will be bad for Democrat candidates, and he’s right. Although I’m nor sure Obama becoming a “victim” will “energize” Democrats, many of whom are disgusted, not only with what OBAMA has done, but also with the DIRECTION this country has taken under a Democrat administration—unless they are “pocket socialists,” too, I don’t think there is enough time left to impeach him and remove him from office before time does it for us. (World NetDaily)

Doing Things Halfway

The United States government never does anything ALL the way; it always does it “HALFWAY,” and thus complicates things. Example: Social Security and Medicare. If you’re an old person who has no money, Social Security will take care of things, right? WRONG! Social Security gives you just enough money to live in poverty. Medicare: You’re old and broke because Social Security gives you barely enough to survive, and you go to the hospital or see your doctor. They bill Medicare and Medicare starts right out by cutting IN HALF the amount of the bill they will pay, while CLAIMING to pay “80% of it.” What they PAY is 80% of the amount they APPROVE for payment, which usually amounts to 40% of the REAL amount. Then hospitals, doctors, subsidiary providers, etc, (X-rays, and such) bug this old person who has no money for the balance. It he/she also has Medicaid, they pay some more of it, and you get billed for what THEY don’t pay. Then you buy “supplemental insurance” with what little money you have (IF you have any), and they pay some more of it. But still not all. You still get billed for the rest and your credit is ruined because you can’t pay it.

Medicare and Medicaid together does not pay it all, and you have to deal with all the credit demands, phone calls, in some cases, suits, etc. AFTER the government (and insurance you pay for) pays only a PART of it. Why they don’t just pay ALL of it, if they are going to pay ANY of it, I don’t know. Social Security: The new medicine provision Bush put into effect to pay for your medicine costs you a hundred dollars off your Social Security check. If you’re on Medicaid, THEY then pay that. Why do they charge you that hundred dollars? To make paperwork and keep government paper-shufflers employed. In the system to pay for your medicine, there’s the “donut hole” provision where, once the government pays for $5,000 worth of your medicine, suddenly, you’re on your own again until YOU pay another $5,000 (or some such),

THEN the government pays it all until you die (IF you last long enough). When you die, they send your heirs (if any) a $250 “death benefit,” which does NOTHING to pay your “end-of-life” costs, which can amount to mostly a MINIMUM of $10,000.00. Whoever sets this stuff up, is STUPID, and makes for total incomprehensibility and lack of understanding for most recipients (who are at a time in their lives when it’s hard to understand ANYTHING), and makes for much PROFIT for the “providers,” while creating thousands, sometimes HUNDREDS of thousands of government jobs. Then there’s what’s happening in Iraq right now: Obama swears there are “no boots on the ground” in Iraq, but that’s a LIE. There ARE “boots on the ground.” They’re just not allowed to fight, though they ARE armed Marines. That must be very frustrating for those Marines, while very satisfying to the bureaucrats in DC. It’s “progressing” in the SAME WAY as it did in Vietnam, where we first sent in some “advisors,” followed by some troops. When the “advisers” got killed, and LATER a full complement of “boots on the ground,” who were forced to operate on “rules of engagement” that guaranteed they could never win, and many would be killed. Then they were summarily “pulled out” by the politicians, leaving Vietnamese to die. Just like it’s going to be (is) in Iraq.

This same scenario is now being REPEATED in Iraq, after Obama summarily pulled his troops out without finishing the job of taking the Islamic terrorists completely out. Things would be a lot simpler if this government did what it SAID they’re doing, all the way, instead of “piecemeal.” But that’s not how they operate. It HAS to be complicated, to keep government workers employed, and as many political donors making profits so they can contribute billions of dollars to political campaigns (mostly Democrat). I’ve always been responsible for my own upkeep, though I made the mistake of not providing for the time when I would be UNABLE to work because of physical infirmity (I didn't think that would ever happen) and thus, would be forced to TRY and take advantage of programs BILLED as “taking care of old people,” but which don’t, and only just BARELY lets them SURVIVE, in conditions of poverty. If they DO have some money saved up, or some property, THAT goes to their creditors. (Just common sense)

I Hate Obama!

At least, that’s what he tells people as the only reason I could possibly be against his policies, and I’m a racist because of it. But he never answers the important questions I ask him while I’m trying to find out the truth, which I’m convinced he doesn’t admit is true. I don’t hate HIM; I hate his POLICIES and their effect on the American people, including ME. I don’t care if he’s PURPLE! It’s an insulting thing to be accused of racism because I disagree with his policies. But I expect of him. That’s all he has. He dare not try and answer my questions, because there IS no answer that doesn’t show him for the criminal and con man he is. I’m the furthest thing from a racist there is. I judge each person as an INDIVIDUAL, and I judge this INDIVIDUAL as a criminal, a con man, and a “serial liar.” He’s the worst excuse for a president we’ve ever had, and that’s saying a LOT. (Just common sense)

Obama "Fire Sale"

Obama’s having a “fire sale:” $32G fund raiser dinner tickets for only $5G. They couldn’t sell them at $32G so they lowered the price—drastically. That sounds like a systemic problem, to me. If staunch supporters who would spend $32G for a rubber chicken dinner with Obama in the room to refuse to buy them at that price, I don’t see how he would get them to pay $5G. I wouldn’t pay a NICKEL to be in the same room with Obama, ANY time. I might pay to stay AWAY from Obama. But I’m smart enough to see through his scams. But not being able to sell tickets at the higher price sounds to me like he’s in serious trouble. I can’t see paying that kind of money to be in the same room with him, but the “money men” who have supported him seem to be “running for the hills” now. And THAT’S a big problem for him. But don’t “let up” on him because you “sense victory.:” Keep on pushing so there WILL be a victory. (Personal Liberty Digest)

Compromising With Democrats

That’s like cooperating with the devil. Democrats are the ENEMY today. They aren’t just “in opposition” to SOME of our deeply-held beliefs and principles; they’re working AGAINST us! Some people—even some conservatives—say we have to be able to “work with” the other side. But what if “the other side” is your implacable ENEMY who is working AGAINST everything you stand for? What if EVERYTHING they want to do is WRONG? The Democrats demand that we “meet them halfway.” But what if “halfway” is leading to our DEATH or complete slavery? To them, “compromise” is “doing it THEIR way.” You can’t meet someone who wants to ENSLAVE you “halfway.” That’s not the intelligent thing to do. And I refuse to do the stupid thing! An example: Democrats are working like beavers to move this country to a collectivist (socialist) system of government. There is NO “compromise” with that. It’s like seeing or not seeing. Collectivism is THEFT from those able and willing to EARN their living and produce NEW wealth, for the benefit of the DRONES of society. It is us “pushing the wagon” while Democrats ride in it and criticize us for what we do to EARN a living for THEM. (Just common sense)

"A Rebellion Brewing"

Liberals will call  Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal “extreme” for saying this, just as they call Colorado Rep. Corey Gardner extreme for being against murdering babies as a substitute for using a rubber. But he’s right. I’ve seen it, too. The liberals running this country are “feeling the power” and are doing everything they can to further enslave us and move us toward collectivism (socialism). Thinking people don’t like that, and the closer we get to a collectivist government, the less they like it. They rebelled because of the British attempt at GUN CONTROL and high taxes before, and liberals are still trying. Worse, that’s only a PART of their depredations. They want to completely ENSLAVE us. Thinking people don’t like that, and WILL rebel if they keep it up. “I can sense right now a rebellion brewing amongst these United States, where people are ready for a hostile takeover of Washington, D.C., to preserve the American Dream for our children and grandchildren. I am tired of the left. They say they're for tolerance, they say they respect diversity. The reality is this: They respect everybody unless you happen to disagree with them. The left is trying to silence us and I'm tired of it, I won't take it anymore.” Jindal might even be a LEADER in such a rebellion. I know if I were a lot younger, I certainly would be. (Eagle Rising)

Remember the First Amendment?

It used to be “sacred” to the liberals—back when they were the “out” party. Now they are the “in” party, not so much. The IRS is “targeting” political enemies. FACT, not rumor or conjecture. Now they’re scrambling to cover it up. The FCC now wants to “eavesdrop” on press rooms, to find out who is saying what, so they can “deal with them.” They use the concept of “hate crimes” to SHUT UP their critics by calling their reporting and actions “hate crimes.” “Hate crimes” can be “defined” by the enforcer. They want to bring back the “Fairness Doctrine,” to shut up such as Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Glenn Beck, etc.

Make no mistake. This is an ALL OUT WAR on freedom of speech, and they’re WINNING. But not with me. I’ll shout my message through the window of my cell if necessary. This book, “Shut Up, America,” details the campaign. BY the way: I get NO “kickback” from sales of this book. (World Net Daily)

Stewart Kills Competitor

First, he spun him out. Then he killed him when he protested. That sounds like I’m condemning NASCAR driver Tony Stewart, but I’m not. Killing Ward was an accident. He was walking toward Stewart’s still moving car wearing dark clothes when he was hit, killing him. I am reasonably sure Steward didn’t kill him on purpose. But this, as well as Stewart’s accident last year that caused him to miss the last half of the season and so be unable to contest for the NASCAR championship, should NOT have happened. Stewart is a MULTIPLE past season champion at the TOP of his NASCAR game. What the hell is he doing still racing in what amounts to “the bush leagues?” I know he loves being behind the wheel of a racecar, but being in this kind of a race, for a multiple NASCAR season champion isn’t too bright. I’m sure it was an accident, but it should be a “wake-up call” for Tony. Be sure I’m not condemning Tony. I like him. But he should stay in racing that MEANS something to him, and can advance his career. (YouTube)

Getting Away With Murder

HAMAS is NOT A “sovereign state,” though they think they are. They are only a terrorist organization dedicated to the eradication of an entire people. It’s in their CHARTER! Why are they allowed to keep doing the things they do? They rain rocket bombs on Israel every day, and whine about Israel “killing children” when they retaliate, as they have the right to do. They teach their CHILDREN to KILL JEWS! For my part, there ARE no “innocent Palestinians” out there, adults OR children. They are ALL taught, FROM BIRTH, to hate Jews, and to want to kill them. This is GENOCIDE, and should be STOPPED. There are many countries that hate what they do. Why don’t they get together and eradicate HAMAS? Further, why don’t they get together and eradicate ALL Islamic terrorists from the face of the Earth? HAMAS and other Islamic terrorists commit WAR CRIMES every day. Why do we put up with them? Why do we send them money? Why do we give ANY credence to their whining complaints about being “victimized?” Why do we welcome them, ANYWHERE? Why does Israel, whom I am sure know where HAMAS’ top people are every moment, don’t just “take them out?” The world would be far better off without them. (Last Resistance)

"Economic Retliation"

The authors of “Muslim Mafia” are being sued by the Council of Islamic Relations (CAIR), an organization that doesn’t even exist any more because they changed their name to confuse their enemies, for writing that book. The fact that the book is entirely true makes no difference to them. They intend to ruin the authors by forcing them to spend more money than they have to defend themselves in court, even if they lose. So far, they have spent half a million dollars on their defense, and soon it will be a million dollars. If this isn’t “economic retaliation,” I don’t know what is. They have no basis for a suit, but they bring it, anyway, so as to ruin their opponents anyway. The authors will undoubtedly win anyway, in the end, but at what cost? CAIR is even trying to get CRIMINAL charges against them. For WHAT, I don’t know. But it’s yet more harassment. As part of their suit, CAIR has demanded that remaining copies of this book be destroyed. The reason for this, and other such suits to come is to make people AFRAID to write such books, true or not. CAIR’s army of lawyers have nothing else to do but harass such authors and all the money in the world to accomplish it. Islam is called the “religious crime syndicate,” which is a good name for it. If American jurisprudence is smart, they will refuse to recognize or allow such suits to even be filed so as to scotch CAIR’s goals. Or at the very least, make CAIR pay the legal feeds when THEY lose. (World Net Daily)

Obama Wrong Again!

He said Iraq was a “sovereign, stable, and self-reliant nation.” WRONG! I predicted when he told his troops to “cut and run” from Iraq that this would happen. As soon as we left, the terrorists “went wild,” raping, killing women in front of their families, beheading CHILDREN. They need to be killed, to a man! They’re EVIL and do not deserve to be alive! ANY of them. They say they “humiliated us” in Iraq and Afghanistan, but that’s a stupidly wrong statement by a stupid Muslim. They humiliated nobody. OBAMA humiliated us. Obama declared loss and pulled his troops out. That was a POLITICAL decision, not one dictated by loss. We were WINNING (had already won) when Obama forced us to leave, which was one of the most incompetent decisions any president (other than Nixon in Vietnam) ever made. We can’t win wars by “declaring victory” and leaving. Muslim terrorists are good at “:hitting and running,” mostly running. They waited patiently until we left, then committed genocide on a nation’s Christians. They’re like roaches, who run for darkness when the lights come on, then come out and plague us in the darkness while we’re looking elsewhere. (Just common sense)

GOP to Give Him A Billion

They’re set to give Obama a “small part” of what he demanded to “solve” the border crisis of thousands of CHILDREN overloading our border crossings.” Here's the problem. Even if John Boehner and Republican leaders place stipulations on the appropriation of funds (i.e. enhanced border security) and give Barack Obama "half" of the money he is requesting, what is to stop Barack Obama from simply spending the money as he sees fit? What's to stop him from simply using the money to further enable the illegal alien invasion that he manufactured with his pen and his phone? Money is fungible. After all, Obama has shown, time and again, that his administration is all too willing to ignore Congress and act lawlessly. You know it. We know it and John Boehner and our self-proclaimed Republican leaders know it.” This is the main reason we’re LOSING to Obama and his thugs. Republicans either just “keep their mouths shut” or actively “go along” with whatever he’s planning while he complains about nonexistent Republican opposition. He only got “half” of what he wanted? NO. He WANTED 4 billion and probably will get ONE. That’s not HALF. But you “ask for the moon” if you want to get to the horizon.” To get one billion, ask for FOUR billion. And Congress will give it to you. It’s only a billion, right? It’s not “real money.” That’s how they think in DC. It’s not THEIR money, it’s only ours. (Eagle Rising)

Changed Their Minds

A Jersey couple used to be staunch anti-gun fools—UNTIL they were robbed and she was sexually assaulted in their home by ILLEGAL gun-wielding criminals. They thought their burglar alarms, security cameras and special security lighting would be sufficient to keep them safe, and they wanted nothing to do with guns. After being sexually assaulted, she was able to dial 911 while her husband was being beaten to a pulp by the armed invaders, who fled when they noticed. Who was she calling? People with guns, of course! They moved to Ohio and now keep a gun in their bedroom. They’re wiser now. Calling the cops never stops the crime. All they can do is DOCUMENT the crime and clean up the scene, getting rid of the body or bodies, if necessary. Security cameras MIGHT help apprehend the criminals, later—AFTER they have committed their crime. But a gun in the house can make the criminals sorry they ever went for a life of violent crime. These people learned that lesson—almost too late. (Last Resistance)