Tuesday, September 8, 2015

Finding the Low Point

It's hard to find the “lowest point” in the Obama administration because there are so many of them. But one possibility is the tenure of Hillary Clinton as Secretary of State. Her “e-mail scandal” may be only the “entry point” that causes us to discover her more dangerous crimes. She and her husband are such accomplished criminals, it's hard to point out what's worse. As that “investigation” continues, her STAFF is beginning to fragment as the committee investigating begins questioning them. One of her aides had a “series of memory losses” on mostly questions asked by Republicans. Another “took the Fifth” the other day. One of them said he has no idea what is meant by “wiping a server.” Which means he is either lying or is a COMPLETE IDIOT. They're discovering more and more evidence of her OTHER crimes as her e-mails come out, “drip by drip.”

Maybe soon they'll find out what incompetence led to the “LOSS” of SIX BILLION DOLLARS down a deep, black hole. How much of that made it into the Clinton bank accounts is not yet known. Another scandal is her handling of Benghazi, which resulted in four deaths, including that of an ambassador. The government can't seem to find any of the terrorists who were involved, although CNN didn't have any trouble locating one of their leaders, who they “interviewed” in a coffee shop where he was enjoying a latte. As things keep “bubbling to the surface,” she is now even losing contributions, which are down, while people like that simpleton Bernie Sanders is “creeping up on her backside” and may well be her Obama in the 2016 election. Her numbers are down, and his are up. Will a really serious crime surface? Has it already? If it does, will they be able to keep it from ENDING her as a politician and even as a “free woman?”

Can the Democrats “keep a lid” on her crimes” so they won't “go down with her?” She's scheduled to “be questioned” before a congressional committee (again) soon. Will we be treated to yet another example of her complete LACK of interest in the deadly results of her crimes as the last time, when she exasperatedly hollered, “What DIFFERENCE does it make?” The question was about her incompetence in letting these murders continue while REFUSING to send help. I'm sure it makes a LOT of difference to the relatives of those she allowed to be murdered. But does she care? Not a chance. There's no PROFIT in it. (MRCTV)

No comments: