Banning Religion

In DC, they can no longer run ads on a city bus if they have anything to do with religion. The DC Diocese lost in court when their specifically religious ads were rejected by the Transportation Board because they could not show where particularly secular ads were rejected. That's because they sued on the wrong grounds. They were not rejected because they were religious, rather than secular. They should have sued on grounds that to reject them on religious grounds was unconstitutional, The prohibition keeping religion completely OUT of anything run by the government is a purposeful misreading of the Constitution, It does NOT prohibit religion on government property. It prevents the making of ANY LAW that prohibits, or specifies a certain religion or inhibits the practice thereof. NOT the elimination of religion, period. To ban ads on religious grounds violates that prohibition. I think the misreading of the Constitution is on purpose by a liberal and/or liberals who want to eliminate as much religion as they can. (Liberty Headlines)