Not At War With Terrorism?

That's what the White House (Obama) is putting out, and they're right. We ARE “at war with Islamic terrorISTS! “Well, we say we're in a war against al Qaeda. We have just never said we have been in a war against terrorism, which is a tactic. It's an unusual thing to say that we're at war against a tactic.” Semantics. Yes, “terrorism” IS “just a tactic.” But that tactic KILLS people, so we should be out to STAMP IT OUT—COMPLETELY. Not just “control it, or “reduce it's effectiveness.” We are IN World War III, whether or not we realize it. And we'd better start treating it as such, and “pull out all the stops” to destroy the Islamic terrorists. That INCLUDES “boots on the ground” to hunt down and KILL as many Islamic terrorists as we can, wherever they hide. And if a few innocent Muslims get hurt as a result, too bad. “Collateral damage.” That's what happens in a war. Way too many innocent Americans get hurt, ON PURPOSE. The Islamic terrorists go after “soft targets,” not hardened military targets. Then they run and hide until the next time they can catch us by surprise. Obama needs to “wake up” to reality. (Eagle Rising)

Holder All Over Again

Many Americans think we're getting a new attorney general, but we're not. Loretta Lynch is going to be just as bad as Holder is. She has SIGNALED that with her comment about the “Taliban being misunderstood.” Her opinion that they are NOT terrorists, but are merely “armed insurgents using terrorist methods.” I got a clue for ya, Loretta: if they USE terrorist methods, they ARE terrorists. And they're NOT misunderstood. One of my clearest memories of the Taliban is one who walked up behind a hooded woman in a STADIUM, fergwdsake! And put a bullet in the back of her head. Her “crime?” Having sex with a man not her husband. No trial, no “due process.” Just a man saying she had sex with somebody. And Holder thinks they are “misunderstood!” What's it going to take for this administration to get it through their thick heads that we ARE at war with Islamic terrorists and “pull out all the stops,” including “boots on the ground, to find and KILL them wherever they hide between killing sprees? (Personal Liberty)

"No-Go Zones" In America?

Yes, there ARE Muslim “no-go zones” in America, where Sharia Law rules supreme. Where the cops are afraid to go. Muslims come here and do NOT “assimilate” into OUR culture. They set up their own neighborhoods where non Muslims dare not go, or they get beaten up or murdered by hastily-organized (by cell phone) mobs who quickly assemble if a “soft target” is found in “their territory.” And if a MUSLIM misbehaves there, they don't call the cops. They handle it themselves, using Sharia Law. The cops never hear of it. Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal says, "If they want to come here and they want to set up their own culture and values that's not immigration, that's really invasion if you're honest about it," Jindal told Family Research Council President Tony Perkins on his radio show on Monday.” Areas where Muslims “rule” are appearing everywhere. And Islamic terrorist training camps are, too. They're training terrorists to act against us, right here in America. And those camps are ALSO “no-go zones.” We'd better wake up and DO something about this, before they win , simply by OUTNUMBERING US, in our own country. (News Max)

Phony Racism

Michelle Obama refused to “knuckle under” to the Saudi's requirement that all women wear a head scarf in public, something we don't require of them. She figures that, as wife of the head of ANOTHER state, that requirement could not apply to her. She's right, and I applaud her for it (she doesn't do much for me to applaud). American liberals are now “asking” if it was racism that caused the criticism. They look for racism under every bed (Aside: Now they're saying a black cop shooting a black man is racism). It is the Saudi's (Muslim) demand and she ignored it. They can't have a mere woman do that, can they? According to Muslims, women are “chattel,” to be ordered around at will. By anybody. They're just mad because they couldn't beat her for it. (Daily Caller)

"Hijab Day"

This is a way of teaching tolerance and understanding of others.” That's what the “authorities” of a taxpayer funded charter school in Sacramento say about the reason for their “Hijab Day.” Never mind the fact that Muslims are the most INTOLERANT bunch there is, and are commanded by their “Bible,” the Koran (however they spell it today), to KILL those who do not believe in their phony “religion. The very EXISTENCE of the hijab and its purpose is a TESTAMENT to the intolerance and subjugation of women. This event is illustrative of the STUPIDITY of most liberals. It amazes me that supposedly otherwise intelligent people don't see the deadly threat represented by Islamic terrorism, that they are the ENEMY, and that they work so hard to “legitimize” a cult like Islam. It's instructive that it's ONLY the FEMALE students who are “encouraged” to wear a hijab, while males are NOT. It's also instructive to note that the “school authorities” want to stay as far away from this event as they can, saying it was “The students' idea, which we neither required, nor prevented.” Right! Intelligent people know that if they didn't APPROVE, it would never have happened. (Daily Caller)

Al Gore's Epic Swindle

Global Warming (whatever Al is calling it now) is a hoax. It has made Gore a billionaire (with a “B”). But there is one “inconvenient truth” he can't ignore (though he does), that the “globe” has NOT been “warming” for more than 15 years. In fact, it has been COOLING somewhat. And what is his scam over? ONE DEGREE higher temperatures over 100 YEARS! Nobody denies that is possible, but what we doubt is his contention that MAN is the cause. It's supreme arrogance about man's ability to affect the climate that makes ANYBODY think man can significantly affect the climate. Furthermore, what the hell difference does it make if the temperature rises ONE DEGREE in a HUNDRED YEARS? Frankly, I think that would be a GOOD THING.

This has been such an EPIC SWINDLE that even that con man in the White House has begun promoting it, so he can create even more CONTROLS over Americans and con them into paying more taxes to “fight it.” Can anybody show me PROOF that global warming is something we should FEAR? Something we should spend BILLIONS of dollars to avoid a ONE DEGREE increase in temperature over 100 YEARS? And I don't mean you should cite that false “scientific research” provided by pseudo-climate “scientists” who have, themselves, gotten many millions of dollars in GRANTS to “study” the climate, some of which have ADMITTED falsifying their “findings” to keep the money coming in. Finally, why in the world should we worry about a weather prediction over 100 YEARS when weathermen can't even get it right on a SNOW PREDICTION in New York City over ONE weekend? (Just common sense)

Hillary Hates Free Market

That's strange, because she benefits handsomely FROM it. Her speaking fees are in the $250,000.00 to $300,000.00 range, even higher than Mitt Romney's $50,000.00 fee. They wouldn't be possible without the free market.She thinks other people shouldn't be allowed to “hold people up,” but she does it, every day. NOTHING this bi...er witch says is worth that kind of money, except to her dupes, who slobber over her every word, but won't buy her book. Maybe because most of them can't read and comprehend. I'm sure their comprehension of her speeches isn't much better, but they enjoy the “droning” even if they don't understand the substance—if any. What you can charge, in capitalism, depends on what people will pay. That's a basic part of the free market. And as long as fools will PAY that much, she'll take advantage of it She says she gives “discounted rates” to universities, and $300,000 IS her “discounted rate.” (Last Resistance)

As Usual, He's Lying

Obama is again trying to convince us he's winning in the ”war against TERRORISTS.” He says “ISIS is on the run,” when it's evident they are NOT. He said the same thing about al-Qaida just before they made many significant advances. He refuses to admit it, but ISIS is the “new incarnation of al-Qaida” (a "branch office, as it were) and is growing daily. They're “running wild” all over the landscape. Beheading men, women, and CHILDREN for not being Muslims—or for even being a different KIND of Muslim of which they disapprove. They've taken back all the gains we made (while many soldiers died) in Iraq before he ordered his troops to “cut and run” without finishing the job of “rooting them out and killing them.” As long as they have no real opposition, they'll keep on killing and growing like the malicious cancer they are, killing, raping (adults and CHILDREN) and beheading their kidnap victims if we don't pay “homage” to them. Meanwhile. Muslims are moving to this country in droves, and breeding like rabbits. They hope to accomplish by OUTNUMBERING us, what they cannot by a frontal attack. And when they do, every man, woman, and child in this country will suffer under their thumb, and Sharia Law. They're “evil incarnate” and must be DESTROYED. Obama is DELUSIONAL if he thinks he can convince us he's winning when it is so OBVIOUS he is NOT. (Just common sense)

What's Wrong With People?

Anybody with ANY amount of intelligence knows that Islamic terrorists are a “clear and present danger” to us. So why then, do “school officials” allow and even REQUIRE indoctrination in Muslim principles in our schools, while ELIMINATING anything having to do with Christianity? What's WRONG with these people? In North Carolina, it has been found that they are injecting Muslim theology into what impressionable children are being taught in school, “on the quiet.” And this is not the only place in America where this is happening. I've read about SEVERAL places where young kids are being taught Muslim theology and principles, and being REQUIRED to attend what amounts to Muslim RECRUITING sessions! This IS a CHRISTIAN nation, and that's the way WE like it. There is no logical reason to teach our children Muslim theology except to get some of them to CONVERT to Islam before they're smart enough to know better. And some school systems are cooperating in that endeavor. Why? Are they STUPID? Or are they saboteurs? Like Obama? Some say this fits in with “Common Core.” Which is yet more proof that we need to DUMP “Common Core.” As if there weren't enough,proof, already. But the feds are insisting on us adopting “Common Core,” anyway. (Patriots and Politics)

ISIS Karma

I've always said that people who cut off other people's heads should have THEIR heads removed. And it appears that somebody else thinks so, too. A top player in the self-styled “police force” in Syria, which is part of ISIS (also known by several other names, as is common with Islamic terrorists) has been found without his head. Apparently, somebody who liked to smoke didn't like their recent order BANNING smoking because when the head was found, it had a cigarette in its mouth. I probably wouldn't go that far over smoking, but this man did much more than ban smoking, and richly deserved what he got. And since he didn't die while trying to murder people who didn't believe the way they DICTATED, he probably won't get his “74 virgins.” Boo-hoo! We should see more beheadings of terrorists. Maybe they'd start thinking twice before doing it to others. (Preserve Freedom)

Walker: Plus or Minus?

Some people ask this question honestly, but they ignore many things. “It never ceases to amaze me the way people perceive things. To one group, certain actions are brave and commendable. But to another group, those same actions are cowardly and unconscionable. It proves the old saying, 'you can’t please all the people all the time.' Yet, in our country, this division has grown deeper and wider. This is the divide we see with the political record of Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker. His historic battle with organized labor as governor and his confirmation election is one for legends. To the conservative right, Scott Walker is the perfect example of what they want a politician to be. Someone who is ready and able to fight the injustices that so plague our country.” Some people in this country haven't the faintest idea of what is GOOD for the country. Everything Walker has done DEMONSTRATES that he would be among the BEST prospects to be the next president, but they can't see it. The same with Sarah Palin. The left has done a good “hatchet job” on her, and are in the process of doing the same to Walker, with the usual lies and innuendo. They're scared to death one of them will be elected, and will destroy all the ills the liberals have accomplished. (Freedom Force)

If So, What Next?

The mayor of Paris, France, wants to SUE Fox News for saying they have many “no-go zones,” where NOBODY, cops included, can go, where Sharia Law reigns supreme. Funny; seems to me that's just NEWS, that has actually been known for a long time. She says Fox “offended” Paris. Tough. So what? Many news items “offend” somebody. Seems we have a Constitution, and the First Amendment, which PROTECTS news outlets from such frivolous suits. If France is allowed to contravene that, and especially if it WINS, what's next for news agencies? Good luck in collecting ANYTHING. What kind of insipid “news” would we be subjected to if news agencies can be sued for ”offending” someone by publishing TRUTH about them? For that matter, what does this say to FRENCH news agencies? (World Net Daily)

Harbinger of Things to Come

Sheriff's deputies conned the parents of seven home-schooled children outside, then presented them with a search warrant, based on a “:report” that they “allowed their kids to run around outside barefoot.” Then, when they found a water filter not “approved” by the government (that was designed to purify water and was used for that purpose) they TOOK the children, “for their own protection.” But you and I know the REAL reason. They needed an EXCUSE to kidnap these children, who will probably end up “adopted” by another family and CPS will get $4,500 to $6,000.00 EACH from the feds as am “adoption fee,” after getting various fees paid for every day they are “in custody.” All this on a “trumped up” reason. CPS is good at that. (World Net Daily)

This Is Not A War!

It's a CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY. The Islamic terrorists are murdering Christians, yes. But they're dissecting them and selling their body parts for BILLIONS of dollars. I thought it was bad for communist CHINA to place their prisons close to human abattoirs so THEY could sell the organs of their victims. But apparently they're PIKERS in comparison to Islamic terrorists, who kill Christians by the HUNDREDS at a time. Add to that the ransom (s paid by some countries to keep their citizens from being beheaded, and you have a LOT of money being made. They're doing a very nice “side business” in human organs and kidnappings to help finance their atrocities. Make no mistake: it IS a war. But it is also an excuse for criminals to make a lot of money.  (Eagle Rising)

It's Communism!

I know the very mention of communism makes people's eyes “glaze over” today because the liberals have us convinced that “communism is dead,” in spite of the REALITY that communism is NOT dead—not even in Russia, where it is SUPPOSED to be dead. The same people are in charge there today as before, and their system is SOCIALISM, which is ONE form of collectivism, while communism is another. So the only difference is in what they CALL it. ALL forms of collectivism depend on TAKING from those who EARN and GIVING that stolen to those who DO NOT. And when our president talks about “taxing the rich” to pay for his “giveaway programs,” it IS communism. Don't fall for his stinky brown stuff.

He is working HARD to make this into a SOCIALIST nation, which is almost THE SAME as communism (Russia called their system SOCIALISM). The only difference is in the details. Collectivism (socialism, communism, Fascism, etc.) has NEVER worked. It will LOOK like it is successful for a time, but it will inevitably fail. Russia's communism “failed” because collectivism does not produce NEW WEALTH. It only preys on the existing wealth of producers and profit-makers. Collectivists SAY they “hate profit,” but their entire SYSTEM depends on people MAKING a profit, so they can steal it and GIVE it, unearned, to those who do nothing for it, except vote the looters into office time after time.

In Cuba, where they have had more than 50 years under a communist regime, people (except for top government officials, of course) still drive cars left over from the fifties. And people are mostly starving. When Obama talks about making community college FREE, he's looking for VOTES. He never mentions who is going to PAY for his schemes, but the people who get the bill are the TAXPAYERS; you and I. When he says something must be free, he means “paid for by the taxpayer,” not him. Collectivism is the biggest CON ever to come down the pike because it has fooled many otherwise good people, along with the schemers and con men. Talk about “sharing the wealth” is INSTITUTIONALIZED THEFT. Theft by the GOVERNMENT (looters) for the benefit of the moochers, to buy their votes. (Just common sense)

Nothing More Important?

Jeeze! An ESPN reporter admitted to “being a creationist! And the Internet EXPLODED in dismay. WHAT? You mean some fool actually ADMITTED to believing that this world was CREATED by God, rather than just “evolving?” And people got upset over that? Aren't there a few more important things in this world for people to get upset over? Frankly, I never knew why this was such a source of friction. God is supposed to be “all powerful” and if HE wanted to, HE could MAKE “creation” happen, couldn't HE? Even so, what the hell difference does it make? Seems to me Islamic terrorism should be something to be upset about, but way too many people “bend over forward” and let themselves be screwed where it hurts by Muslims all over the world. Shouldn't they be upset over that? Our PRESIDENT is spending more of our money than ALL his predecessors COMBINED, leaving our children, grandchildren, and great grandchildren owing hundreds of thousands of dollars in taxes before they're born. The point is, there are MANY things we should be getting upset about, but we aren't, since we spend our time worrying about people who believe in CREATIONISM! Sheesh! (Freedom Force)

Twisting the Law

That's what the “child protectors” do. They PRETEND to have “the best interests of the child” at heart, but they'll use ANY EXCUSE to steal people's children from them. They'll twist the law until it screams so they can kidnap children for the “fees” the feds pay them at every juncture while they “hold them hostage.” And if they're able to keep them permanently, and adopt them out, they get yet another “fee” of $4,500 to $6,000 EACH. The $6,000 figure is for “special needs” children. But what child will NOT be “special needs” after being put through their wringer? In the case linked here, they used a “non-government approved FILTER as their excuse. They typically exercise “Gestapo-like control” over families. Their REAL reason for taking these children from their loving family is that they are home-schooled. But since they can't use that as an excuse, due to some recent court decisions, they cite use of a non-government approved filter, which is about as silly an excuse as I've heard, and I've heard some silly ones.. How transparent can they BE? But they don't care. They have their own court systems, with their own judges. And the judges' word is LAW. They flout the Constitution, saying that since their abuses are “civil matters,” so the Constitution does not apply. (Preserve Freedom)

"The Power of the Purse"

Trey Gowdy says, “It's time we used the power of the purse to rein in Obama.” And he certainly needs “reining in.” He has spent more money than ALL the presidents who preceded him COMBINED! And he's still not done spending. His latest idea to get his hands deeper in your pocket is free community college tuition. He says it should be free, but doesn't say who is going to PAY for it. But one thing I know, without being an “economic genius,” and that is, YOU AND I are going to pay for it if he gets it in force, not him. “It should be free!” That's what liberals say about many things. But the inevitable fact is that, whatever it is, it MUST be paid for. If the recipient doesn't pay for it, somebody else must. And who is it that usually is tapped to pay? YOU; and me. The taxpayer is called upon to pay for many things, from which OTHERS are the only ones who benefit. This is SOCIALISM (one form of collectivism, just as is communism). Communism proved in Russia that it did not work, and the reason is that it is BASED on THEFT from the PRODUCER of new wealth while GIVING to the NON-PRODUCER. The “moocher,” who “wants a share” of what industrious people EARN, but without having to WORK and earn it themselves. This is “institutionalized theft,” and it's time we realize it. (Minuteman News)

Obama's "The Enemy"

I guess I'm not the only source to tell the world that Obama is “giving the enemy help and comfort” and hopes it will win. That makes him an “enemy of the United States,” president, or not. Freedom Outpost says, ”He is behaving as a despotic, anti-American enemy within our nation.” He “rules” in favor of the Muslims every chance he gets; he sends them $billions of our taxpayer dollars, DISGUISED as “humanitarian assistance” to what HE describes as “rebels” in Syria, but which are Islamic terrorists. He “runs guns” to them, and he systematically PROVIDES them with more men for their Jihad by releasing bloody murderers from GITMO, to go back and kill again. Now he wants to make ANY criticism of “Jihad” (meaning Islamic terrorism and their murderous activities) a CRIME. There is only ONE REASON he would want to do that, whatever LIE he tells about “protecting us” by keeping “incendiary articles” out of circulation “to protect our people.” That is NOT how we operate in the nation that is “ruled” by the Constitution, and its First Amendment, which GUARANTEES freedom of speech. Like most Islamists, he doesn't want his cohorts' murderous activities spoken about in the press because it makes THEM look like what they are: bloody murderers, rapists, and child rapists and beheaders. If he is successful in getting such a law passed, or just does it by FIAT, I will become a criminal, because I will NEVER “shut up” about their depredations. There's only ONE WAY to shut me up, and that's to “take me out of circulation,” one way or the other. (Freedom Outpost)

"Walking Without A License?"

A Texas woman was ticketed for “driving without a license and was arrested --WHILE WALKING down a road. Sounds like a stretch to me. I guess the cop just needed one more ticket to make his quota—or the city needed a little more money. The cop assaulted the woman (by forcefully grabbing her arm and moving her toward his car) and said “he knows she was driving without a license” even though she was WALKING. Apparently he also SEXUALLY assaulted her while making an ILLEGAL search of her person. Then he said she was “being hostile” and arrested her for “resisting.” She was kept overnight in jail and was not advised of the charges against her until the JUDGE told her the next morning in court, when he advised he that her bail was $500.00. What makes this even more damn foolishness is the fact that she DOES have a driver's license and was NOT driving. The whole thing sounds like a “put-up job” by a police force that is “out of control” and should be investigated by a higher power. (PrisonPlanet)