Typical Anti-Gun Hypocrisy

Hollywood is consistently against allowing the “average American” (which does not include them, of course) to have guns to use in defending themselves against the millions of ILLEGAL guns out there in the hands of law-breakers. Meanwhile, they employ ARMED security and utilize armed cops to protect themselves. Yes, most of them don’t carry their own guns (although some do). They can afford to HIRE somebody for that purpose. It’s the same with most of the anti-gun politicians. They make laws to keep us “average Americans unarmed and helpless, while using our tax money to HIRE armed security for themselves. It’s the old “yes for me, no for you” philosophy used by the “ruling class.” They reserve for themselves rights they deny us. Any time a politician tells you that you don’t need a gun—you need a gun.

The first thing would-be despots do is take away the guns from their “subjects.” That way, they can do with them what they wish, since they’re the only ones who have the guns. But they forget one thing. The “average citizen” can get guns illegally as easily as can law-breakers, and if gun control becomes total, they will. I know I will. Like all Americans, I insist on being able to defend myself against the law-breakers. And if I have to become a law-breaker myself, to do it—I will. I will not stand for politicians (who go armed, themselves, in one way or the other) blocking my ability to defend myself, or the have and use the means to that end, a gun. People like Mike Bloomberg, former NY mayor and current presidential candidate, push aside their armed “security” and say things like, “We can’t allow the average American to be armed.” Who is “we?” (Breitbart)