How Many Must Die?

How many people who have information detrimental to Hillary or Bill Clinton must die before somebody actually starts investigating the series of suspicious deaths of those people who might testify against them? Or who is in a position to stop them from some of their atrocities such as that Supreme Court Justice who was found with a pillow over his head, dead while visiting a Dumocrat supporter? That took hours for the U. S. Marshal service to even show up, and whose death was “certified” by an obscure justice of the peace instead of a real judge? Then there was the man who “committed suicide” by shooting himself in the head—TWICE just before he was to testify against one of the Clintons. Those are only a few of the badly bungled “investigations” into some of those suspicious deaths that have not even been questioned. The investigation that should ensue is one into the frequency of people dying before they can implicate a Clinton in wrongdoing, or who can block them FROM that wrongdoing. (Three Percenter Nation)

Can't Make Self Defense

Those two Georgia rednecks who murdered a black man are now claiming self defense in the murder, according to their attorneys. They’re saying it was a justified killing because they were defending themselves when their victim saw two men with guns attacking him and fought back. Fighting back doesn’t qualify as an attack. Not in my world, anyway. You can’t attack a man on the street and not expect him to fight back. They say they “suspected him” of committing a crime when he entered that construction site, when all he wanted was maybe some water. He didn’t steal anything and left right away. They had no real reason to follow him with guns and attack him, while he had every reason to fight back. That does NOT create a self defense situation for those two armed men who were attacking an UNARMED black man who was doing nothing but running on a public road. Last I heard, running while black was not a crime—except to racist red necks. These men need to be put away for a long time. (Mail News)

Civil War Coming

That’s what Rush Limbaugh thinks, anyway, and I agree with him. Dumocrats all over the country are insisting on keeping their “stay-at-home orders” in place, long after they have been proven to NOT be a preventative to the spread of the virus. Those that do let their states open put impossible limitations on business, such as limiting restaurants to 50% business. Limiting them to using only 50% of their tables eliminates ANY profit, and profit is the ONLY reason they go to work in the morning. Keeping everybody at home stops all production of goods and soon there will be shortages of everything, including food. That’s when people will start a serious rebellion. Then the cops will intervene, and start shooting people. After that it’s “open season,” and the people will begin shooting back. Then it’s war. And that’s what the Dumocrats want. After the war is over, they can then institute their socialism, which is what’s behind all this. The virus is just the vehicle they were looking for. The Socialist Dumocrat Party is subversive. They always have been. (Freedom Updates)

Watching A Murder

Many people say we need to wait until all the facts come out before making a judgment in the killing of George Floyd in Minneapolis. I disagree. The image of a cop, who has had many complaints against him but never disciplined kneeling with his knee on the neck of this black man is enough. What preceded it does not matter. That is excessive force, especially since the “crime” the man MAY have committed is not a violent one. Word is, he remained in that position, with his knee on the man’s neck for a full five minutes. That tells me the man’s death was NOT an accident. He was MURDERED while the world watched. The four cops involved have now been fired, but that’s not enough. They should be charged with premeditated murder and convicted. Riots and looting are not a proper response. The businesses so looted are not to blame for the murderous actions of those cops. The “powers that be” need to act quickly to charge these cops, or the city will suffer more damage from further riots. Further delay in doing so is unconscionable. (Just common sense)

Crossed A Red Line

Obama laid out a “red line” that the Iran Ayatollah’s should not cross, and they did cross it. What did Obama do? Nothing. In fact, he sent them a palletful of money to use in their further “red line” crossings. Which, of course, empowered them (in their minds) to continue their outrages. Then our regime changed. President Trump was elected, and Iran thought they could continue their outrages unpunished, as usual. But they didn’t reckon on this president. He drew a “red line” and they crossed it. So he sent a drone to “take out” their number 2 man, and top general. Which sent a message to the Ayatollah that he could be next. They know where he is, at all times, just as they did the general. And he is now “part of the landscape” outside the Baghdad Airport. He is fertilizing the greenery. The Ayatollah must be “quaking in his slippers,” watching the skies for his own drone. He knows that if he continues to “bite at Trump’s ankles,” he will soon see one—just before it makes HIM “part of the landscape. The snowflake Dumocrats, of course, criticize Trump for taking this general out. But they would have also complained if Trump dd not take him out and he murdered many more Americans. Whatever he does, Dumocrats don’t like. (Just common sense)

They're Doing It Again

Dumocrats in Congress are trying to pass a bill into law that will inevitably weaken the Second Amendment. Their umpteenth try. This bill will do many things that are not good. Among them is the ability to INDEFINITELY delay background checks. Expands background check requirements, and offers money to anti-gun fools. If they can indefinitely delay background checks, that means you cannot buy your gun until they “graciously allow” you to do so, whenever they get around to it. We know that a right delayed is a right denied, and that’s what they want do. They are hiding the purpose of this bill by misnaming it “The Urban Progress Act.” They know this bill will be strongly opposed, and they hope, by misnaming it, to cause us not to “tumble” to its real purpose. It’s sponsored by Rep. Robin Kelly, a Dumocrat, of course. This bill, if passed, will be yet another unconstitutional law against gun ownership by American citizens, since it is an “infringement” upon the right guaranteed us by the Second Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. Don’t let it happen. Sign the protest included here. (Firearms Policy Coalition)

A Bad Decision

Shutting down the economy because of the Coronavirus was a bad decision, and I put it down to the newness to the job of our current president. In his lack of experience he took some bad advice, and managed to destroy all the good he had done in his first three years. Playing right into the hands of that subversive Dumocrat Party. The economy going to hell is just what they want, and you can count on them blaming Trump for everything bad that happens because of the “shutdown,” ignoring the virus as a causative factor. All they will point up is that the economy went “down the tubes.” Shutting down was supposed to be “the cure,” but it soon became evident that the cure was worse than the disease. Law-abiding people are ignoring the law, demanding that we open it back up. Trump is realizing his error and is opening things back up, with certain necessary restrictions only. Many governors, most of them Dumocrats, have taken advantage of the shutdown to impose unconstitutional rules on us, claiming that the virus allows them to “bypass” the Constitution, which it does NOT. But they do it, anyway, and enforce it until the Supreme Court tells them they may NOT, after much damage has been done. (Just common sense)

Sex Ed for Children

In Chicago, they want to start a sex-ed program for children as young as FIVE! Looks like they want to go back into the educating of children about sex business that they used to participate in, before they were “found out” and theded (we hope). In their prior program, they designed “sensors” to gauge the child's physical reaction while they showed them government-made porn. For the girls, it was a penis-shaped probe that went in her vagina. For the boys, a similar “probe” that went in his anus. Of course, the “probe” wasn't really necessary for boys, since they could figure out his reaction to the porn by his erection. But not them. They wanted to shove something up his rear end. Now they want to teach children too young to even know what sex IS, all about sex. Have you ever seen a child that learns about something who doesn't want to TRY it? So the net result of their “experiments” will be a significant INCREASE in sex among small children. (WGN News)

Gun Control Backfire

In Great Britain they passed laws that essentially DISARMED their entire population (except for the law breakers, of course). They thought that would result in fewer violent crimes. Of course, it didn’t. Law breakers still got their guns, and those criminals who couldn’t get guns illegally took to using knives with which to do their violent crimes, leading to what Britons call “the knife crime epidemic.” Of course, this was to be expected among people with intelligence, anyway. Apparently, the politicians in the UK don’t have enough intelligence to expect this kind of a result. Next, they will ban KNIVES, hoping THAT will work—and it won’t. Bad guys will still get their guns—and knives—and violent crime will continue, unabated. Why politicians everywhere don’t learn from experience, I don’t know. Maybe it’s because their purpose is NOT to “reduce gun crime,” but to make it impossible for the law-abiding to defend themselves from the attacks of the law breakers, who routinely IGNORE such laws. (Gun Free Zone)

It's About Damned Time!

I’ve been wondering for a long time why former FBI Director Comey is still out of prison. It’s because nobody seems to have found it necessary to properly investigate the FBI’s handling of the General Flynn “investigation.” Now current FBI Director Wray has finally, after much delay, ordered that investigation, hopefully to get some of the dirt off the FBI’s skirts. Wow! They now tell us that the FBI has no authority to file criminal charges against former employees. They waited until they could no longer prosecute him. Well, who DOES? There must be some way to punish them for putting a decorated war hero through such a turmoil, causing him to go bankrupt, and even putting him in jail, after even the investigators said they didn’t think he was guilty of anything. They even tried to drop the investigation, early on, but Strzok wouldn’t have it. He wanted Flynn’s scalp, and he got it. Even though he had to pony up the “evidence.” Yes, he did finally lie to the FBI. He was TOLD by the FBI what to say, and he finally broke, and said that he was told to say. Flynn was TOLD, by the FBI, to lie to an FBI questioner to avoid having his children put through the same wringer. And that was the lie they “got him” on. Maybe now some of those who railroaded Flynn will “get theirs.” But I’m not holding my breath. (Washington Examiner)

Shutdown: Wrong Move

I’m sure President Trump thought he was doing the right thing by closing down the entire economy of the United States, but it was actually the exact wrong thing to do, in his lack of experience running a country instead of just a corporation. What it did was completely destroy all the good things he had done for the economy in his first three years in office. And threatened to destroy the economy, period. With nobody working and producing needed goods, there would soon be no goods on the store shelves, and people would begin to starve. Add to that the complete lack of income, and people wouldn’t be able to afford to buy what little was on those shelves, and things would collapse. More important to the government, there would soon be no taxes paid because people weren’t making money. Today the government is sending people money, but soon there wouldn’t be any money to send, and no amount of printing it would do anything. The cure was worse than the disease, and people would begin to die. Some would just kill each other to get what was theirs, since that would be the only way to get it. Chaos would ensue. Those who wanted to take us over would do so in our weakened state, and soon we would be in a dictatorship. It will have been inevitable. Fortunately, realizing his mistake, he is trying to reverse it. Hopefully, not too late. (Just common sense)

Balance of Power

I think people who can THINK need to ask why the feds are “stockpiling weapons” while at the same time trying their best to DISARM the populace, even though the Second Amendment to the Constitution prohibits them from doing that. Is there an ulterior motive there? Are they planning to “move on us” and want to reduce the possibility they will run into guns when they come to take what is not theirs? Their anti-gun laws, while they do tend to reduce the number of LEGAL guns there are in the hands of the law-abiding, do NOTHING to reduce the numbers of ILLEGAL guns already in the hands or the law BREAKERS. Who do they think they’re fooling? The ignorant, maybe, but certainly not people with the ability to THINK logically. The more LEGAL guns they take out of the equation, the easier it will be for them to victimize those who do obey their silly laws. They will never be able to do anything about those illegal guns out there, because they concentrate only on the LEGAL guns. They know those holding illegal guns won’t be a problem when thy come for our property because those holding illegal guns will be doing the same—just without the LAW to back them up. (Just common sense)

Judge Knows He's Wrong

The Obama-appointed judge in the Gen. Flynn case, went directly against the Constitution when he refused to accept the fact that the Justice Department had come to their senses and wanted to completely drop the case against the general because it was a set-up, from the word go. He insisted there be someone appointed to argue against it in court. Which gave him a chance to maybe refuse to drop the charges or, at least, prolong Gen. Flynn’s agony while eliminating the possibility of a suit. He has now taken the unusual step of hiring his own lawyer to represent him in a higher court. He knows his ruling was wrong, and now wants to be protected from the consequences of his actions. When has a judge ever needed a lawyer to defend his rulings? The Flynn case was a “house of cards” and only needed the release of a few documents the FBI wanted kept hidden to expose. It was based on Flynn lying by telling it what the FBI told him to say or see his son go through the same things to which they subjected him. I would have lied to God to save my kids from that fate, especially since they didn’t deserve it. (Just common sense)

Yahoo Censored Me

They have taken down my main web site in a very sneaky way. They refused my debit card, which I use every day without a problem. I tried and tried t pay the yearly fee to host my web site. I tried seven times, and each time they told me “there was a problem” with my debit card, but would not tell me what it was, giving me no opportunity to fix whatever problem there was. They sent me many messages telling me it was overdue, from “no reply” addresses, making it impossible for me to fix any problem that might have come up. I did reach them by phone once and they told me to go to their web site and “follow directions.” I did, with the same result. I don’t know if it was a conscious effort to censor me, but I have my suspicions. It does have that effect. My main web site has been taken down, and I haven’t been able to do anything about it. If Yahoo will just tell me what the “problem” is, I will fix it. In any case, I have a new persona; web site at

htts://raythomas101.weebly.com .

Silly Anti-Gun Ideas

The anti-gun fools come up with many silly ideas in support of their useless, unenforceable anti-gun laws. One of the silliest is the notion, by one state “lawmaker” (whose state I will not divulge, to keep from embarrassing them) who thinks the Second Amendment was written only for hunters and hunting. Another is that if background checks are instituted, there will no longer be “gun sales on the street.” How that politician thinks that will happen is not clear, as with all such ignorant comments. They think making somebody who fears being killed should WAIT until some nameless, faceless bureaucrat decided they’re waited long enough to get their gun to defend themselves is being made safer by that waiting period. Some time ago, a woman in Denver was threatened by an old boyfriend and tried to buy a gun. Faced with a mandatory waiting period, she went out and bought a gun “off the street,” illegally. A couple of days later she used that gun to kill the boyfriend when he came to kill her. She was not charged in his death, because it was a clear case of self defense. But she did spend some time in jail on illegal gun charges, but she’s still alive, which she would not be if she had sat back and waited until they “allowed” her to buy that gun legally. Which says to me, “Better to be judged by 12 than carried by 6.” (Just common sense)

Is bin Laden Really Dead?

Yes, the Obama administration did a good job of convincing this country his people killed bin Laden just before his re-election. But did he really? Or did he just set it up try to look like he did to give himself a boost in getting re-elected for another four years, so he could screw this country up even more? Some people say that’s true, but I don’t think so. I say that because since then, we haven’t heard a peep out of bin Laden, and if he were still alive the terrorists would be moving Heaven and Earth to prove it. Videos showing him, moving around, showing the front pages of newspapers with dates evident. There would be terrorist “events” done in his name. Everything they could to convince us we were lied to. Al Quida would be very active, and he would be very visible in every terrorist act. Yes, I believe bin Laden IS dead—maybe not at the hand of Obama’s agents. Maybe he got killed in some other way and Obama just took advantage of that. I notice they made quick work of getting rid of the body so nobody could perform an autopsy, saying they were “observing Muslim customs.” As if they should do so with a bloody murderer responsible for the deaths of many thousands of innocent people so he could make a political point. There had been an announcement at least ten days earlier in some newspapers that he had died of natural causes, since he was already in poor health. (American Thinker)

What Are They smoking?

If I were a stoner, I’d want some of what the anti-gun fools are smoking. They can’t really believe their silly little anti-gun laws that only apply to LEGAL gun owners will have ANY effect on law-breakers, who obey NO laws. So what is their purpose? They either have an ulterior motive in disarming most honest, law-abiding Americans, or they’re stupid. Or they’ve lost their minds—if they ever had one. They can’t think they can actually violate the Second amendment to the Constitution with impunity. It says, “[The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.” How clear can you be? And the way to change that was designed to be difficult, so any would-be despot would have a helluva time disarming the people so he (or she) could “lord it over” us. So barring the possibility of a change to the Constitution, which is revered by all honest people, they don’t have a chance in hell to get around it with a simple gun ban. They’ve tried it, many times, and always failed. If they ever succeed, they will run into a brick wall. The American people will NEVER stand for a complete ban on buying and owning the means to self defense. Not when there are millions of ILLEGAL guns out there, in the hands of law-breakers. Are the anti-gun fools part of the law-breakers? Do they want to disarm us so they can victimize us? That remains to be seen. (Just common sense)

Detroit Getting Smarter

At least its police chief is. Detroit police Chief James E, Craig has come out and frankly SAID that “armed citizens deter crime.” A long time ago when he was a police chief in California, where it takes an “act of congress” to get a carry permit (and crime is sky high), he was denying cc permits every day. But when he got to Maine, where it is EASY to get a carry permit and crime was WAY down, he changed his tune. Now he’s in Detroit, and is, against all odds, thinking the same way. And by so thinking, may single-handedly reduce violent crime in “bankrupt city.” Craig says, “Maine is the safest place on Earth,” and puts it down to the ease with which honest people can get carry permits. It’s amazing, and demonstrates his superior intelligence, that he gets this connection, which most police politicians do not. (The Blaze)

"Put Up or Shut Up!"

Dumocrat “investigators” and non-investigators (anti-Trump politicians) are always confidently assuring us they “have clear and convincing evidence” of wrongdoing by President Trump. Bur they never tell us what it is, because there isn’t any. They just want you to believe there is. Whenever I hear one say that, I want to tell him/her to “put up or shut the hell up!” “Pencil Neck” Adam Schiff is the worst one doing this First it was the “Russian Collusion.” then when they couldn’t prove that, it became “obstruction of justice.” When they couldn’t produce proof of that, they looked around for something else they could accuse him of. Then President Trump did what he has the authority to do and fired several Obama-appointed Inspectors General and they’re “off to the races” again. When they can’t prove anything there, they’ll come up with something else. They’ll still be trying to get him on SOMETHING long after he has left office in 2024. Jerry Nadler is another fool who tells us all about having evidence against Trump, but he too, cannot produce it. “Mad Max”ine Waters is always telling us about “Trump’s crimes” while she funnels campaign cash to her daughter. I’m getting tired of hearing it. We need to “retire” these fools, and more. There IS no “evidence of wrongdoing” by Trump. So they’d better put up or shut up. (Just common sense)

"Cops Can Protect You!"

“So turn in your guns. You don’t need them.” WRONG! At least, in Detroit, where the cops can take from 12 minutes to DAYS to respond. Meanwhile, you’re on your own. So either get a gun, or run and hide—if you can. The bad guys don’t have any trouble getting the guns they use to victimize you. And Detroit is not the only city with horrible response times for the cops to come when called. It’s a growing problem, nationwide. Maybe not as bad (yet) as in Detroit, but even a few minutes can make all the difference to people who are disarmed, for the most part, by their government—IF they are law-abiding, and actually OBEY laws. Some police agencies boast response times of three minutes (sometimes). But a bad guy with an ILLEGAL gun can kill a lot of people in three minutes if not opposed by someone else with a gun. At the risk of being visited by the cops (of some kind) for advocating illegality, even if such speech is protected by the First Amendment, I will say, probably the best course is to get a gun, any way you can, so you can effectively defend yourself because it’s “better to be judged by 12 rather than carried by 6.” (WXYZ Channel 7)

NASCAR and the Second

The liberal media is making a big thing of a NASCAR team being sponsored by a promoter of the Second Amendment. Like that makes them nasty—or something. Truth is, NASCAR people are big supporters of the Second Amendment, and it is a good move for that team. The Second Amendment is a GOOD THING, since it makes politicians who think they should control everything, and all of us, in everything we do (like AOC) think twice before going too far in controlling us. It is a known fact that would-be dictators always disarm their citizens to make them easier to control. On the side of the race truck is an “in-your-face” picture of Donald Trump as “The Punisher,” which is what he is—at least for the “swamp” dwellers. NASCAR people also tend to be Trump supporters too, which makes that simply something funny to them, and a “slap in the face” to liberals—which can only be good. This sponsorship is guaranteed to “trigger” all liberals, who tend to be in favor of taking your guns away, and triggering liberals, anywhere, can only be a good thing. I try and do it, every day. And they’re so EASY to “trigger!” (Story Warrant)

"Islamophobia"

Militant Muslims have come up with a phony word to blunt ANY criticism of any Muslim, anywhere, ever, without having to answer the criticism. The phony word is “Islamophobia,” and it imputes some kind of mental insufficiency into the critic. This way they don’t have to come up with answers to criticisms of their sometimes strange actions, and even deadly ones. Well, I can come up with phony words of my own. Mine is “NonIslamophobia,” which imputes a mental aberration into any criticism by a militant Muslim to anybody NOT a Muslim. Something to which all militant Muslims are prone. Now notice I append the word “militant” onto that, which shows that this is not a criticism of all Muslims, although all are taught, by their “Bible,” the Koran, to do so. I don’t agree with many of the teachings in their religion, but that’s their business, as long as they don’t try and impose their beliefs and practices on me. Gays have their own phony word in “homophobia,” and is designed to do the same: impute a somehow mental aberration onto any body criticizing gays, for any reason. I predict there will be many more phony words created, and the purpose will be the same: to blunt any criticism of a certain group of people without the bother of answering their criticism. (Just common sense)

Wet Pants Liberals

They hate what President Trump did in “bringing justice” to a bloody terrorist, operating under the protection of the Iran government. A man responsible for hundreds and hundreds of deaths—including many Americans, who was planning yet more atrocities. They completely underestimate our ability to “drop Iran like a pair of dirty pants,” and overestimate Iran’s ability to hurt us. Like the terrorists, they ignore all the provocations of the past, done by that general and his cohorts. They like to operate as if Trump’s action in “taking out” that general was the first bit of violence that occurred, some even trying to paint that general as a “peaceful poet” more interested in his poetry than anything else. They actually think Iran is strong enough to actually hurt us in any big way. Yes, they do have nukes. But if they use them, they will cease to exist, because we have nukes, too. Many more than they have, and we are much better at knowing how to use them. And we will know the very minute one is launched in our direction, and we have the ability to shoot it down before it gets near us—an ability they do not have, which will mean “death to Iran.” There’s a MAN in the White House now, not a wimp like Obama. We will not reward them with pallets of dollars like he did. If they go too far, we will “take them out.” (Just common sense)

Can't Talk About Guns

Isn’t this supposed to be a free country with a First Amendment to protect our right to speak about ANYTHING, and express ANY opinion, even if it is opposite to someone else’s? Apparently they don’t think so in New Jersey, where they’re trying to pass a law to stop anybody from talking about, writing about, or publishing anything relating to 3D printed guns. That sounds like a law they’d have passed in communist Russia! Not in the United States of America. I find it hard to believe that legislators there are so arrogant that hey can blithely pass a law that is in complete contravention to the Constitution, to which ALL LAWS must conform. That’s the LAW. The Constitution is the very BASIS for ALL our laws, and it cannot be ignored in making ANY laws. The Second Amendment Foundation is suing New Jersey Attorney General Gurbig Gruwal to prevent this law from being made, and unless they come before an ultra-liberal judge, should win. Of course, Gruwal, a Sikh, is a Dumocrat, who probably doesn’t even understand our Constitution and the way we make laws. (World Net Daily)

Nothing New Today

I spent the afternoon with my doctor today and when I got home I was wiped out. I just don’t have the energy for new posts, so there won’t be any until tomorrow. Sorry.

"There's No Damned Money!"

At least one Dumocrat congressman went on the Floor and gave an impassioned speech criticizing Republicans for saying “there was no money” when they criticized Peelosi’s $3 trillion dollar giveaway program just passed in the House. He then asked them, “What world are you living in?” The answer to that is simple. “The real world.” There IS no money. Just the interest on the National Debt would keep most countries going for a long time. That’s BORROWED money, congressman! We borrowed it because Dumocrats spent all the money we had, and then some—and now they’re doing it, again. But hopefully, wiser heads will prevail when that measure reaches the Senate, and the bill will be dumped in the garbage where it belongs. The bill is touted as being “help for the unemployed,” but all it is, is Peelosi’s “wish list” of money to support her giveaway programs that will lead us to socialism. We’d better get rid of this bi—er, witch. She has already bankrupted us, and now she wants to dig us even deeper. (Clash Daily)

Stupid Comparisons

They don’t have any meaningful arguments to support “gun control,” so they just demonize their opposition. So it is with the Washington Post, who recently, without any kind of proof of anything, compared gun sanctuaries to slavery. What kind of fool thinking is responsible for that, I don’t know. Nobody’s being forced to do anything in those “gun sanctuaries.” They have only been designated as such by a majority of the people who wish to maintain their right to be armed for self defense, and not DISARMED by stupid politicians, and made to be defenseless. They know that each and every anti-gun law is unconstitutional for a simple reason: The second Amendment is very simple and easy to understand if you’re not a fool. It says, “The Right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” Of course the anti-gun fools try and misunderstand it because of the preceding words about am “organized militia,” which did not even exist at the time of the writing pf the Constitution, and really have no meaning, since at the time, they included ALL THE PEOPLE in any such “organized militia,” if one was to be organized. The government, at that time, was not “flush with money” as it is now, and wanted them to bring their own guns when called up. In any case, there is no real comparison with any kind of slavery in those “sanctuaries.” Those laws are unconstitutional because they “infringe” upon those rights. (Washington Examiner)

Taxing It Won't Work

In California, they’re considering putting on a special tax on guns and ammunition. They don’t know that taxing it won’t work, either. Although it will bring millions of dollars into the California state coffers—which, I’m convinced, it their only purpose. None. Not a single one of their anti-gun laws has done a single thing to limit, or stop “gun violence,” so now they’’re going on a different, completely predictable direction. “If you can’t stop it, tax it.” Can anybody tell me how much effect a tax on LEGAL guns and ammunition will have on the purchase and use of ILLEGAL guns in California? Not a bit. And that’s predictable. They know it won’t, but they’re satisfied to use “gun violence” to put money in their pockets. And if you believe some of the money collected through this tax will not end up in then pockets of some of those ignorant politicians, I’ve got a bridge in Brooklyn I want to sell you. “Gun Violence,” like global warming/climate change has put a lot of money in the pockets of the swindlers promoting it. It’s all a scam to pick your pockets with taxes. (Heartland Institute)

Abuses of Power

Politicians all over are using this Coronavirus panic to abuse their power. Many are making edicts that fly in the face of the Constitution, claiming that the panic makes it necessary. One example is in Washington state, where Gov Inslee is reopening restaurants, but requiring that customers give the restaurants more information than they’re entitled to, which can be accessed by agents of the governor. How the hell that does ANYTHING to mitigate the virus is beyond me. In order to remain open, restaurants must also meet a dozen other requirements including operating at 50% capacity or below, and seating no more than five guests at each table, according to Inslee’s office. Such information is none of the governor’s business. The government in liberal Washington State has already, before the virus, stuck its uninformed nose in business by forcing them to pay workers not worth more than $7 and hour $15.00 and hour, which cuts severely into their profit picture and threatens their very existence—and that’s without this further interference. Politicians have seized on this virus as an opportunity to place all kinds of new “rules and regulations” on us, which will last long after the virus has been conquered. (American Thinker)

Sexual Misconduct Accusations

I’m beginning to believe there isn’t a politician in DC or anywhere else who hasn’t been accused of sexual misconduct at one time or another. Accusations of sexual misconduct seem to be the most popular thing to do to smear your opponent because nobody seems to want to find any proof. They are just accepted, and the victims are forever tainted by them, proven or not. Former VP Biden has been accused, and there seems to be more proof there than with others. But Fox News commentator Chris Wallace recently noted that Trump had also had some accusations, not mentioning they were sans proof. It almost seems like every day somebody is accused of sexual impropriety. And I don’t think many men in important positions are going to risk it all by an overt sexual move when they know how easy it is to smear people with such accusations. Women know proof is usually not required to smear their intended victim and many women use the threat of such accusations as a weapon. Others simply make the accusation because the guy made them mad, somehow. It’s an easy way to get back at a guy who made them mad. (Just common sense)

Abysmally Ignorant Politicians

That’s the only way I can describe the politicians who bite on the bull droppings fed them by the anti-gun fools who think “controlling gun violence” is as simple as making laws that ban or hinder people from getting and/or using guns in self defense against the millions of ILLEGAL guns out there in the hands of the “bad guys.” There is plenty of history to prove that NONE of their laws do a damned thing to limit, or “stop gun violence,” but they keep making them, and celebrating the fact that they have been made, as if they will do anything about “the problem.” They just can’t seem to get it through their thick skulls that all their laws are USELESS to accomplish their goals. Not as long as they concentrate on eliminating legal guns from society. Their laws do nothing except make it easier for he law breakers to victimize the law-abiding, who DO obey their laws, while the law breakers do NOT. They’re law breakers, after all. It’s predictable. But not to those anti-gun fools and their damned fool politicians. (WAMU)

"No Scandals Administration"

Barack Obama must think we’re as stupid as he is if he expects us to actually believe that his administration was “scandal-free.” I can detail at least 18 scandals in his administration. Just a few are” “slow-walking” conservative organizations for tax-free status—something for which at least one IRS fool lost her job, (although her lavish pension will keep her living comfortably for the rest of her life); then there’s Benghazi, where people died; the Bowe Bergdahl scandal; the Veteran’s Administration “death list” scandal; $500 million lost to Solyndra, and many others, way too numerous to mention here. I don’t think I’ve got enough computer memory to list all of them. Barack Obama was one of the worst presidents we have had in memory, surpassing Jimmy Carter and his “Misery Index” many times. And he stands up there and tells that enormous whopper—and actually expects us to believe it. Obama was also one of the worst LIARS in memory. If it comes out of his mouth or off his pen it MUST be a lie. With what he has done, it’s hard to believe he isn’t in prison. Ex-presidents are NOT above the law. Dumocrats themselves have said so often enough about Republicans. (Just common sense)

Irrationa Response

Recently, a gunman started out on a shooting spree in a Fort Worth church. He thought he had it all his own way as he opened fire on the congregation. But he didn’t reckon on an armed worshiper, who instantly put a stop to his plans by killing him with one controlled shot, seconds after he opened fire. That one shot, from an “average citizen,” stopped what could have been yet another massacre. So the local “officials” moved quickly to make sure it wouldn’t happen again. Not the would-be killer, but the defense to that killer, by banning legal guns in churches, state-wide. How irrational is that? Making people defenseless against law-breakers with their illegally-owned guns is absolutely irrational. But that seems to be the “knee-jerk” reaction by the anti-gun fools. Which is why I call them fools. Making people defenseless is NOT the way to self defense. Allowing them their own guns to use in self defense IS. But those self-same anti-gun fools, who CLAIM to be “experts,” won’t hear of it, while many people DIE because of their silly notions. You can’t pry them loose from their idiocies, no matter how much you try. And they worm their way into positions where that can make such laws, or influence the making of such laws, while people die of their stupidity. (Gun Watch)

Tipping Their Hand

HR8 destroys ANY transfer of ownership of a gun without the knowledge and APPROVAL of the government. It criminalizes private sales, giving a gun to someone, even LOANING a gun to someone without their knowledge and approval. Nancy Peelosi says a future Dumocrat president could declare a national emergency over “gun crime,” and “Pocahontas” piled on, saying when she’s president (a real long shot, that) she would definitely declare a national emergency about “gun crime. Another good reason NOT to vote for her, to add to the plethora of other reasons. Currently, the law has a “safety valve” in the fact that if the government doesn’t act on a background check in three days, a dealer is free to complete the sale. HR1112 kills that. Which means a president could declare a national emergency and SHUT DOWN the NICS checks for any amount of time, which would stop ALL gun sales in that time. And he or she could do it over and over again, making it almost impossible for anybody but the government to buy a gun, for any reason. Of course most privately-owned gun stores could not survive even three months without a sales, which would CRIPPLE the gun sales industry—which is their goal. If you can’t just ban guns, just make them impossible to get—legally. Of course, this will just give the ILLEGAL gun sales business a “shot in the arm,” but they don’t talk about that. The only problem with their plan is that ANY law that limits gun purchases is an “infringement” on a constitutional right, which is PROHIBITED by the Constitution, to which ALL LAWS must conform. But they just ignore that. (Gun Talk)

Trump Won't Leave?

Long time “journalist” Ted Koppel says that Trump won’t leave office if he is not re-elected. What a stupid thing to say! Any office holder who loses his re-election and refuses to leave office will be dragged out in chains by a U. S. Marshal and put in prison. But I digress. That’s what they say about every president. They said it about Bush. And Clinton, and Obama. And when the time came, each one packed up his belongings (Clinton a little more than his belongings) and went on he is way after welcoming the new president. What people like Koppel do not consider is that there are laws to handle things like that, and a president who refuses to leave office is violating them. And he or she WILL be removed, bodily, if necessary. And the Secret Service will not side with him. They will stand aside and let it happen because they know the law. People like Koppel are fools if they think otherwise, and are just trying to “whip up” negative sentiment. (Right Wing Tribune)

Here We Go Again

A known violent man who was "officially banned" from owning and/or using a gun because he was a felon got a gun anyway. then he murdered his wife and went on a killing spree that terrorized a small North California town, until the "good guys with guns" came and killed him. When will the anti-gun FOOLS begin to realize that their silly, USELESS gun laws do NOTHING to stop such malcontents from getting guns, with which to shoot and kill innocent people? Yet they keep making them, and they use such instances as this one to fuel their further calls for more useless "gun laws." They are already calling for the .50 cal. rifle to be banned, and some fool wants to ban the gun used in Texas to stop a similar "killing spree." What kind of reasoning they use for that, is beyond my comprehension, since without this gun being legal, the death toll would have been much higher. I just think these fools HAVE no reasoning ability, and many liberals claim there IS no such thing as reason and logic. such stupidity abounds among liberals and other anti-gun fools. (Just common sense)