The Dumocrats couldn’t lynch Trump with impeachment
because he wasn’t guilty of even the feeble “charges” they
brought against him—with no proof of any wrongdoing among them, so
they lost, and lost BIG when the Senate found him innocent. Of
course, Nancy Peelosi refuses to accept that decision and says,
“Trump didn’t really get acquitted.” Yes Nancy, he did. Whether
you like it, or not. You don’t control the Senate like you do the
house, where those accusations began. So now they’re going to go
back to that old, discredited opposition to Justice
Kavanaugh’s confirmation, which they lost, too. Now they’re
claiming the FBI “didn’t interview 30 witnesses” in
investigating him on orders from the White House, and now they want
to do it—a year later.
Of
course, it’s a false notion, but it gives them cover to keep the
spurious “investigation” going until the election—again hoping
to derail Trump’s re-election. That they’ve misread the mood of
the voters is obvious to anybody BUT Dumocrats, and they will lose
again. One wonders what phony accusation they’ll make after that.
Probably John Bolton. And, since Bolton really has nothing to add
except his OPINION on policy, they’ll fail again. And come up with
something else. As in the anti-gun fight, they demonstrate their
insanity by doing the same things over and over and expecting a
different result. They couldn’t impeach Trump, now they want to
impeach Kavanaugh. After that fails, they’ll probably go back to
impeaching Trump—again. (Western Journal)
No comments:
Post a Comment