Get to the Children Early

The Nazis knew the best way to have no trouble with the populace in the future was to “get to the children early” while they’re too young to know what’s best, and teach them what you want to teach; in this case, collectivism (socialism). So they passed a law: The Child Abuse Prevention And Treatment Act of 1974, (CAPTA). This law set up a system of BONUSES, paid to local child protection agencies at every juncture, when they TOOK children as a FIRST OPTION, with or without proven child abuse. While in their custody, they can “program” them in any way they wished. Moreover, they could “put the fear of God” in parents and eliminate parental rights, based on real, or IMAGINED child abuse therefore stopping them from objecting effectively when their children are being taught collectivism (socialism) as an ideal in school. They paid “the locals” for every HOUR the child was “in the system,” and for every DAY.

If they were able to revoke the parent’s rights and put the children up for adoption, they got $4,500 to $6,000 PER CHILD from the government. That this gives them an INCENTIVE to take children from their parents on the smallest pretext, keeping them as long as they can, and finally putting them up for adoption need not be said. Locals themselves made money in the form of “bonuses” for the number of children they were able top take from their parents for “performance.” They received promotions based on their “performance,” and THAT means more money. Yes, SOME are just “good people” doing a “hard job.” Others do what they have to do to get those bonuses and promotions. The “good people” are often ORDERED to do things they don’t wish to do by their bosses, who are often just looking for those bonuses. It’s a scam to deprive parents of control over what their children are taught in school. (Just common sense)

Open Insurrection

An Islamic group is openly espousing the “fall of capitalism and the rise of Islam” in a meeting at a hotel in a Chicago hotel. They’re using our freedoms as “weaknesses” to enslave us. This organization is promoting a world-wide Islamic government, using “Sharia Law” instead of our Constitution as a basis for law. They SAY they’re “non-violent,” but they support Islamic violence in all they do. Their name is “Hizb ut-Tahrir, a global Sunni network with reported ties to confessed 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and Al Qaeda in Iraq's onetime leader Abu Musab al-Zarqawi who is committed to establishing an international Islamic empire (caliphate) and has operated discreetly in the U.S. for decades, is now out in the open. (Fox) They claim it is “religious persecution” to “give them a hard time,” but it is not. It is common sense for us to limit the activities of a KNOWN insurrectionist group, no matter what they claim. Does anybody think anybody would be allowed to hold a meeting in a country THEY control espousing freedom and liberty, and a capitalist government? They should be declared a “terrorist group” and their actions limited or stopped. This is not a matter of “freedom of speech.” It is a matter of our survival.(Right Truth)

Hurry, hurry! Get It Done!

That’s how Obama gets what he wants, even though what he wants will bankrupt us. He insists on rushing things through so fast, even Congress doesn’t know upon what it is voting. He wants to rush things so much that NOBODY knows what he’s imposing on us. He promised a ”transparent administration,” but he’s working hard to keep us from knowing what he’s up to. I don’t call that a “transparent administration.(Just common sense)

Crankshaft is Deluded

I like the “Crankshaft” comic strip. I identify with him in many ways (not all). But this strip, which appeared on June 7, 2009, reflects what the government wants you to think about the economy, that the people in charge who “messed things up” for the economy ought to be punished. I agree, but they aren’t the people this strip assumes they are. They’re NOT the “money lenders,” who were FORCED to loan money to people they KNEW could not, WOULD not repay it or be punished themselves This came about when the DEMOCRAT-controlled Congress passed the “Citizen’s Reinvestment Act of 1976”, and it was signed into law by a DEMOCRAT president, Jimmy Carter. They created a “safety valve” in the “Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac” companies and "pulled it" just before the election to CREATE an "economic meltdown" just in time to win the election. Now they can't stop the juggernaut they got started, using their discredited Keynesian Economics scheme. (Crankshaft)

Obama'sPress Flack Denigrates Reporter

The reporter simply asked for some proof that the phony letter that was on the web site of the Kapi'olani Medical Center for Women and Children in Honolulu, and which was even used for fundraising was a real letter and was not created, using HTML code for the web site. So Gibbs denigrated him in this way: "Lester, the next time you ask me a question I'm going to ask you what reporting you've done to demonstrate to your listeners the truth, the certificate, the state, so that they can look to you for that momentous search for the truth, and you can wipe away all the dark clouds and provide them with the knowing clarity that comes with that certainty." Then he went on to shake his head and say, "Is this what journalism has come to?" Seems to be the burden of proof in this case is on the president, not the newsman who was just asking for evidence of truthfulness. Obama could lay this whole thing to rest simply, by providing PROOF of his birth-place, not just the “put-up” “pretend proof as he has so far. But he won’t. And there’s a reason for that. He can’t, and he’s becoming more and more panicked. I think somebody ought to start a legal effort to FORCE him to produce proof or be removed from office. Do I think it will ever happen? Probably not. (World Net Daily)

The "Usual Scam"

Whenever they want to sell us on an expensive giveaway program (another swindle), they “low-ball” it. They tell us how much THEY figure it’s going to cost and it’s always about 500% LESS than it actually ends up costing. Social Security, for instance, was only supposed to cost a few million. But it now costs TEN TIMES as much as they told us it would (it's bankrupt) they said that only the top 3% (the “rich”) would ever have to pay it. Now the IRS is auditing waitresses and cab drivers for their TIPS! They're still taking taxes out my little bit of a job. I'm still paying INTO Social Security! Even though I'm collecting a pittance FROM it. Keep that in mind when they tell you how much their latest swindle is going to cost you. They’re doing it now on the “takeover” of the health care business and Cap & Trade. (IBD Editorials)

"Dog and Pony show"

That’s what the “hearings” to decide (or confirm) Sonia Sotomayor to be the next Supreme Court Justice. The chairman of the committee hearing it is unabashedly a Sotomayor supporter, and WARNS Republicans against “asking her hard questions” (he calls it “being polite”). The whole proceeding is just a “dog and pony show” held to convince us the Congress is SERIOUSLY considering her nomination. But they’re not. She WILL be confirmed. I will be surprised if she is not. (One News Now)

Health Care Stampede

This is just one of the things Obama wants to “stampede us” into passing. In fact, every time he wants to con us into agreeing to our own destruction, he tries to “stampede us” into it. Ayn Rand called it “the sanction of the victim.” There are so many holes in his plan you could drive a train through it, beginning with the CONCEPT itself. He doesn’t want us to look close enough at it to spot them. He doesn’t even want to allow CONGRESS, which is made up of people who AGREE with him, to get a close look at it before they pass it into law. So he releases the bill (if he does at all before a vote) the night before the vote is scheduled, and the bill is usually 1,000 pages or more, guaranteeing that lawmakers will not be able to read it before casting their votes. This is how things work in Washington today. (Just common sense)

Stimulus Swindle Working Exactly As Planned

That’s what Obama has said (though he didn't use those words). But it’s NOT working the way people THINK it should be working and they’re saying so, throwing Obama and his pirates into panic-mode. It IS working to keep the country in an uproar, making them willing to pass into law his various collectivist schemes without the Congress even READING them. Every day they introduce another “ripoff” bill that will cost us more millions, billions, and TRILLIONS, while moving us ever closer to collectivism (socialism). And every one of them is a “rush job,” that he wants “passed quickly” or the “economy will suffer.” Meanwhile the economy IS “suffering” from his earlier “rush laws” designed to “save it.” When he said it is “working as planned,” he MEANS as HE planned, not as the people THINK it was planned. The economy continues to get worse and worse, and people are demanding to know WHEN it will improve, so now he’s begging for “more time” for it to work the way WE think it ought to work—which it is NOT going to do. (One News Now)

Biden Screws Up again

For one thing, when called on the fact that Obama’s Keynesian solution isn’t working, he says, “look around.” Where? Everywhere I look this country is hemorrhaging jobs. Costs are going up at an alarming rate, mostly because of all the new taxes Obama is imposing after campaigning on a “no new taxes” platform. Your money is worth a lot less now than it was when Obama “took over” because he has been printing money so fast it makes me sick, in one of the most dastardly schemes ever (printing money with nothing valuable behind it, therefore making all money now in existence worth less, which STEALS money from us “under the table”). Another Biden gaffe is when he said, “We have to spend money to keep from going bankrupt.” How stupid is this man? (Glenn Beck)

"Thought Crime"

George Orwell wrote (In his landmark book, "1984) about the government making laws against what THEY considered to be "thought crime" and prosecuting citizens for what they were THINKING. “Many Americans can only shake their heads at the nutty excesses of multiculturalism in Canada, where ‘Human Rights Commissions’ prosecute conservatives and Christians for ‘hate crimes’ because they speak their minds about Islam or homosexuality. That kind of thing could never happen here, right? Wrong, reveals HUMAN EVENTS -- the use of Canadian-style ‘commissions’ to stifle free speech is already under way in some American cities and localities.” They’re working to pass a “hate crimes” law right now in this country (as this is written). Under this “law,” they can “define” what you say as a “hate crime” and prosecute you for it. That makes it a subjective law, which should never be allowed to pass. (Just common sense)

"No Laws Concerning Religion"

That’s what the Constitution bans. The “anti-religion zealots” define that as MAKING all kinds of law BANNING religion and its practice in any place (owned or used by) government. And they’ve been getting away with it for years because nobody has made a REAL effort to stop them. They also talk about the "wall between church and state," which is NOT in the Constitution (it was MENTIONED in a letter written by Thomas Jefferson) and is NO kind of law. In Pennsylvania, they’re trying to ban the very MENTION of Jesus Christ. A California town is also trying it. This IS “making a law regarding religion or its practice.” But they will neither admit this, nor allow anybody else to do so. I’m not a “religious fanatic” although they will accuse me of it, but I support people’s right to worship as they please. How they worship is nobody else’s business. This is common practice with Democrats (and even some Republicans). Misdefine the law, then proceed to violate it. Too many laws lend themselves to this, being subjective in their nature. One type of law we SHOULD ban is a SUBJECTIVE law (one that allows those enforcing it to DEFINE it). Of course, politicians would find a way to misdefine that to suit their purposes, too. (Just common sense)

Providing Political Cover

They’re now attempting to provide political cover for Nancy Pelosi on her claim that the CIA “lied to me.” The CIA did NOT. What they did, was not mention to her one of their “contingency plans” that were being made JUST IN CASE they were ever needed. Plans that may NEVER be put in place. If they “briefed” Congress on every “contingency plan” they were working on, neither they, nor the Congress would get anything else done. Frankly, if the CIA briefed Congress on everything, there would be NOTHING secret. Congress is such a sieve that our enemies would know everything we’re doing and even what we may be planning because Congresspeople are such blabbermouths. (Just common sense)

Terrorists Making Demands

Obama is trying to “bring 9/11 terrorists to justice” and they’re “refusing” to go to court, saying they will not attend their hearings unless they are allowed to “make a statement” Did anybody think about FORCING them to attend, in shackles and gagged if necessary? Do we allow normal criminals to refuse to appear at THEIR court hearings? I’m against trying them, period. They’re NOT “criminals.” They’re illegal combatants, captured on the field of battle. We hold such people until hostilities end, to keep them from returning to swell the ranks of the terrorists. They COULD have been shot on sight since they wear no country’s uniform and kill innocent people, some small children. They don’t have a CLAIM to “rights.” Some should be executed as spies under the Geneva Convention, even though that Convention does not apply to them. If they keep making noise, they should be shot now. That said, let them speak. Every word out of their mouth can be used to convict them of capital crimes so they CAN be shot. They have shown many times, in many ways, their utter CONTEMPT for America, its people, and everything about the West. (Just common sense)

The "Carbon Credits" Swindle

You’ve no doubt heard about the selling of “carbon credits,” which are simply “permits to pollute” sold by either the government or a private company who GETS them from the government. It’s a way of telling people “pay us and it will be okay to pollute.” It’s a way for people pushing “environmentalism” to pollute more themselves while claiming to have ”bought carbon credits” enough to make up for their own pollution. AlGore, the “pope of the global warming religion,” pollutes more at his home than ten other homes do, and when you ask him about it, he says “I bought carbon credits” to make up for it. But who do you buy carbon credits from? AlGore, of course! They SAY they "plant a certain number of trees" per carbon credit. But have you ever SEEN them plant a tree for carbon credits? (Just common sense)

AlGore Stifles Debate

He has made a statement saying, in effect, “the debate is over; there will be no more debate on climate change” (They don’t call it ”global warming” any more because the globe ISN’T “warming” any more) in a blatant attempt to WIN the debate without having to argue a losing position. I don’t think I’ve ever seen a more blatant con that has worked so well. What a pompous jerk he is! He has attempted to do this before and it hasn’t worked. But governments all over the world are “buying” his massive swindle because he has been repeating this lie for so long it has “become truth.” There’s not a single iota of PROOF of his thesis, but he insists on continuing to push it and it has made him a Nobel Laureate and a multi-millionaire, maybe a BILLIONAIRE. (Just common sense)

"Obama Didn't Ask"

Sotomayor thinks just because Obama didn’t ask her for her views on abortion, she can refuse to tell the committee considering her appointment what they are, too. And she has continually refused to answer that question. The tragedy here is that this will make no difference because this “dog and pony show” is set up to make us THINK they’re seriously considering her nomination. They’re not. The “fix is in.” She WILL be confirmed. The Democrats on the panel cannot contain their glee at being able to confirm her and there aren’t enough Republicans to stop it, so they’re “going along with the act.” Unfortunately, we all KNOW her views on abortion, as well as those of Obama, who voted to force doctors to allow the result of a botched abortion to die on a table without getting in trouble with the law. (Yahoo News/AP)

Obama Claims Credit

After doing everything he could, with the help of his henchmen, to cause us to LOSE in Iraq, now he is claiming credit for our victory. He (and they) said the “surge” wouldn’t work and now it IS working, he says “our plan is working” and we are now able to turn their country back over to the Iraqis.” OUR plan? George BUSH’S plan, actually. But you’d never know that from his press releases. (Just common sense)

Obama Is A Wimp

In an article about how Ayn Rand (author of “Atlas Shrugged,” the book that launched Objectivism as a “force to be reckoned with” they said she would find it in “America’s rational self-interest” to “take down” the current dictators of Iran before they start a nuclear war. “Columnists Dick Morris and Eileen McGann are convinced that Iran is a “dire threat to our national security.” That the president of the United State’s “pathetic performance vis-à-vis Iran...cannot but send a message to all of America’s enemies that his “transparent appeasement of Iran’s government and its obvious lack of reciprocation” show him to be “a wimp” and sends a clear signal to rogue nations that Obama is “clueless” about handling foreign policy crises (emphasis mine). That "...[A]s North Korea prepares to launch a missile on a Hail Mary pass aimed at Hawaii, Obama’s Democrats slash 19 missile interceptors from the Defense Department budget.” Can we afford such a man in charge of our foreign policy? (Atlasphere)

Under What Law?

Obama has now (at this writing) appointed 32 “czars,” bypassing Article 2 of the Constitution, which gives Congress the power to approve or disapprove of his appointments. This is a blatant “power grab” that bypasses the rights of Congress and puts more power in the hands of the president. What law allows him to do that? Or is he just “doing it” and since nobody objects, gets away with it? Obama is blatantly power grabbing all over the map, while stealing as much money as he can from the American people. I look forward to the time when we can get rid of this blatant con man if that’s ever possible. (Just common sense)

Palin's Best Reason

Her best reason for quitting as governor of Alaska is the money her enemies are costing her state to defend her against all those phony ethics charges. It amounts to half a million dollars, which she will be able to pay off with pocket change after she gets her $4 million dollar advance on the book she has signed up to do. Then there’s the multi-million dollar deals that are being offered to do a TV show and a column, and you have the best reason for her to quit, even if she doesn’t run for president. (Just common sense)

Putin's Latest Patsy

“Russia's nondemocratic rulers over the years have shown an uncanny knack for detecting weakness in their foes. Russia's Vladimir Putin is continuing the tradition.” his own patsies tell us he’s one of the “smartest people in the world,” but that only shows how ignorant they are. The only way Russia (the Soviet Union) advanced their wishes in the world is by “fooling the fools” in America. And Obama is definitely one of the fools. The fools always think they are the smartest. That’s part of being a fool. (IBD Editorials)

How Far Will It Get?

A judge is going to hear the case demanding Obama’s birth certificate be shown (something that shouldn’t even BE a case). Watch for unbelievable pressure to be brought to bear on this judge. This shouldn’t even BE a court case because Obama should have been forced to show it BEFORE he was even considered for nomination. But he wasn’t. He was elected, and is now a “sitting president” without showing it, and now we’ve got a court case which will probably cost somebody (mostly us) a LOT of money to get Obama to do what he should have done a long time ago. Why he wasn’t, I don’t know. But he shouldn’t be allowed to get away with refusing to show it and proving he is even ELIGIBLE to be president. He could stop this easily, simply by showing it. But he won’t, which should tell you a lot about it. Don’t expect this court case to force him to show it. He’s got too much power now, and will do everything he can to deflect it. (World Net Daily)

The Best Job for Madeoff

With so much experience on designing and running a pyramid scheme that stole BILLIONS, he should be put in charge of the Social Security Administration. That’s what Social Security is, and it’s getting nearer and nearer to its “tipping point” where there aren’t enough people in the world to support it. Yes, his pyramid scheme collapsed, and he got caught. But that’s because he couldn’t “print money” without going to prison like Obama can. (Payne)

The "Fix is In"

It’s in so strongly that an EPA researcher’s report that didn’t “toe the administration line” was squashed and the researcher’s job threatened if he didn’t “shut up.” They said the “time for debate on this issue is past,” much the same as AlGore has been saying with his “the debate is over” swindle. But the debate ISN’T over. The climate has been “flatlined” since 2,000. The climate is not getting hotter, OR colder. This law, passed in ”the dead of the night” (figuratively speaking) without having even been READ by lawmakers, will cost MILLIONS of jobs, raise ALL energy costs significantly, and “line the pockets” of those selfsame lawmakers and their friends (They’ll be selling “carbon credits,” which mean simply if you pay us [us being the government and ‘pull-peddlers’], it’s okay to pollute).

This is the SECOND major law (that we know of) that has been offered in multi-thousand page form, just HOURS before the scheduled vote. This is the way Obama’s accomplices plan to swindle us out of BILLIONS more dollars. This will happen every time something Obama wants is up for a vote. It will be “hurry, hurry, we gotta get it done” mainly before the people wake up to the swindle involved. Today, The biggest, most successful swindlers in this country are not people we can call criminals. They are Obama and all the friends he has appointed to high office, most offices which are not even subject to congressional oversight (as if THAT would help) and are reportable ONLY to Obama. I keep telling people things like this, but they apparently don’t care if Obama rapes their pocketbook and their rights. Or they just don't believe it's possible that a president, fergawd'sake, is a criminal. (Just common sense)

Firing the Watchdogs

“Watchdogs are an endangered species in the Age of Obama. The latest government ombudsman to get the muzzle: Amtrak Inspector General Fred Weiderhold.” If you’re a government watchdog and you’re doing your job, ferreting out corruption in government, watch out! Obama will fire you on the thinnest of pretexts. Since he is engaged in so much corruption himself, he wants to “scare the daylights” out of those charged with “ferreting out corruption.” (IBD Editorials)

Changing His Mind

Obama strongly criticized George Bush for considering Islamic terrorist “prisoners of war” without a country indefinitely. He wanted to treat them as CRIMINALS and prosecute them within the American Justice System. One problem with that. To do so he must bring them into this country and give them rights to which they are not entitled. They should have been shot on the battlefield, as we DID do to ununiformed “spies” under the “rules of war” in previous wars. They are NOT prisoners because they are “criminals.” They are being held (as we do prisoners of war) to keep them off the battlefield so they don’t swell the ranks of terrorists. They should be kept prisoner until there is no longer an Islamic terrorist threat (if that ever happens). Obama is FINALLY beginning to realize this—something Bush has known all along. Maybe Bush is not the stupid fella the Democrats have painted him. Obama is finding it’s easier to promise such things as a candidate—but not as president. (Taragana)

Subtle Conditioning

Liberals are everywhere. They’re also among the cartoonists our children read every day, and many of their comics subtly push political lies to our children so that, when they grow up, they believe the “liberal line.” A good recent example if the April 29 edition of “Sherman’s Lagoon” where a polar bear is getting some advice from Sherman the Shark about “evolution” since the “ice is melting in the Arctic (a lie).” Kids will read this and never realize it IS a lie. So when they get older, they’ll accept AlGore’s swindle as “truth.” The ice is NOT melting generally in the Arctic (only in a couple of places, and THAT’S cyclical) and polar bears do NOT need help in swimming. They can swim for HUNDREDS of miles; a fact liberals never seem to realize, OR tell their dupes. This is not the result of any “massive plot.” It’s simply the result of the “subtle conditioning” this cartoonist has been subject to since HIS childhood. (Sherman’s Lagoon)

"Reading Legislation Laughable"

House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-MD) seems to think the whole idea of legislators actually READING legislation before they pass it into law laughable. “Seems like some political officials in Congress view their responsibility as stewards of American taxpayer money and future, as not significant enough to warrant their 100 per cent attention.” They think if the staff reads it and tells them what’s in it, that’s good enough. So now our laws are being dictated not by elected legislators, but by their paid assistants, none of whom are elected. (The Quipster)

"Golden Monkeys" But No Firefighters

They don’t have the money to pay firefighters. But they can spend $7.4 million on “golden monkeys” from communist China. This is a common ploy by politicians who are limited by the electorate in how much they can tax us. Cut “essential services,” therefore creating a “backlash,” allowing them to raise taxes “with our permission.” The Chinese finally refused to send the monkeys after we spent the money, but that’s not the story. The story is about them spending millions on “golden monkeys” in the first place, when they’re “poor-mouthing us” on the fire and police cuts. (Google/AP)

They're Afraid of Rush

"The enemies of talk radio are firmly in control of the White House and Congress. Sen. Chuck Schumer and his fellow Democrats are promising an all-out attack on talk radio. With a new 'Fairness Doctrine' backed by an Obama White House (under a different name, of course), political talk, as we know it, will end." Obama and his henchmen SAY they’re “against” a resurrection of the “Fairness Doctrine,” and I believe them. They’ll just change its name and use it to “shut up” the likes of Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Glenn Beck, etc. They’re so afraid of what these people say they wet their pants every time they speak. And if Obama says he is “against the Fairness Doctrine,” you can believe he ISN’T. (News Max)

Reading Legislation

Recently, there has been a disturbing revelation: that legislators do not READ the legislation they pass. This is wrong. They have not been doing their jobs by voting on legislation they haven't read. Legislators (mostly Democrats, but some Republicans, too) have many tricks up their sleeves to get bad legislation passed into law “behind our backs. This is one of them. Another is attaching unnamed paragraphs to existing “must pass” legislation. Today, lawmakers release proposed legislation totaling thousands of pages, hours before a scheduled vote. It would be IMPOSSIBLE to read such legislation before voting on it. This must STOP. Legislators MUST be given time to READ any legislation upon which they’re required to vote and be forced to PROVE they’ve read it before they’re allowed to vote on it. This should be a CONDITION for them to be allowed to vote on ANY legislation. (Just common sense)

Dick Morris' New Book

Obama is delusional. This (Morris) is a guy who USED TO BE a “die-hard” Democrat, defending every bad thing Clinton ever did, until they “fell out.” Then he became a “real man” and took on the Democrats in every way. His latest book does that well. "Morris, whose latest book is ‘Catastrophe: How Obama, Congress, and the Special Interests Are Transforming . . . a Slump into a Crash, Freedom into Socialism, and a Disaster into a Catastrophe. . . and How to Fight Back.’ He is getting an avalanche of incredibly positive publicity. One network had a two-day series with him at the White House. Another network is invited to do a full day's broadcasting from the White House as long as they focus on healthcare reform. With that kind of sloppy sentiment coming from the media, he has [the gall –RT] to talk about criticism. Morris went on to say: 'He has to appear that the media is being fair and balanced to him and he has to say, oh, I'm being criticized, so he can counterbalance public perceptions that he is getting a sweetheart deal from the media.' O'Reilly asked, 'You feel it's because he wants the American public to think that the media is not in the tank for him?' Morris said, 'Exactly.' O'Reilly: 'Everybody knows the media's in the tank for him.' Morris: 'That's why he had to say the opposite . . . He in fact is getting media adulation on a scale no president has ever gotten.' " I don’t much like the “everybody knows” thing, but in this case it IS true. It is the media adulation that makes Fox coverage “stand out like a sore thumb." (News Max)

Sotomayer Quits Elite "Woman-Only" Club

But would she have quit without being criticized when she is trying to get on the Supreme Court? Seems to me she has “shown her true colors” simply by being a member of that group. Quitting now, after being criticized for it just doesn’t count for anything to me. Look for the Democrats to “make light” of it, forgetting that they are the biggest criticizers of Republicans who are members of similar organizations. (One News Now)

Inarticulate?

That’s what liberals say about Sarah Palin. That she can’t properly express herself; that she’s “just a back-woods hick (the liberals’ words) who lucked into the governorship. But they’re (as usual) wrong. She was (outside of Obama) the most articulate candidate in the presidential race in 2008; and if she runs at the top of the ticket in 2012 (without McCain to “muzzle her” so she can’t say ALL the things she COULD have said), she’ll win in a landslide; especially if she has somebody like Bobby Jindal as her running mate. And liberals are “in terror” at that possibility, since they “shot their wad” getting Obama and the rest of the “top-level swindlers” elected, thereby accomplishing a “bloodless (I think) coup to take over the U. S. government. They’re now reporting that she “resigned” as Governor of Alaska, (which is true, but not the whole story, as usual). What she said on her “Twitter” page is that she simply announced she would not be running for re-election when her term ended. And that, rather than be a “lame duck,” she’s resigning so the Lt. Governor (who will rise to the office of governor) has nothing “holding him back” while Alaska pays a “lame-duck governor” to run around making speeches.

They say as a reason that she has had to spend too much money defending herself against all the (phony) charges being laid against her (ALL of which, so far, have failed). But if those charges are related to her governorship, it would be legal for the state itself to pay those legal bills (though she doesn’t want to drain the state that way unnecessarily). And they think she is stupid enough to think resigning will stop the attacks. Whether she’s actually resigning makes no difference to her presidential possibilities. That makes them “wet their pants (or dresses)”. What REALLY scares them is that she’ll have more time to devote to a winning campaign. They know that every time an “unashamed conservative” runs AS a conservative (not as “liberal lite" CLAIMING to be conservative), they DO win in a landslide. Reagan did it twice. He’s dead and they’re still “badmouthing” him. Which means they’re still afraid of him. I hope this country can survive Obama long enough for her to “kick him out of office” and start repairing the damage he will have done. Reagan did it to Jimmy Carter and I hope she will do it to Obama. She used a basketball metaphor I think is apt: she’s “passing the ball” to other players on her team” to “get things done.” She is by no means “quitting.” As General MacArthur said, she’s “advancing in another direction.” (Palin’s Announcement)

"Taser Death"

Twice in recent days people have been shocked and have died. The “quick” judgment is that the shock killed him. That is impossible. Stun guns cannot kill. There isn’t enough AMPERAGE to do so. They use low-amperage shocks to save lives! I’d bet that when the autopsy results are in, it will be discovered that both these people had underlying medical problems that killed them, not the stun gun. Of course, family members will not accept this, as the stun gun is a “convenient target.” They’ll say the medical examiner is “part of the system” and ruled to “save” the cop who stunned him. MEs don’t operate that way. They find what’s there and report it. Maybe it has happened in the past, but it’s not “common.” Medical Examiners are THERE as an “oversight” to the cops, and anybody else who might kill someone, accidentally or on purpose. In one case, the man fell to his death AFTER being stunned, but the press STILL called his death as CAUSED by being “tazed.” I’ll wait until I find out just what killed this man before I blame the stun gun the cop used. (Just common sense)

SC Gov. MADE It "Public"

The South Carolina governor (Mark Sanford) left his state with NO ONE knowArgenting how to reach him to go down South and pursue his long-standing affair in South America. I don’t care much about his affair (though it DOES tell us a lot about his judgment just as Bill Clinton getting oral sex in the White House did about Clinton) But leaving his state “in the lurch” MAKES it a “public issue” and, in my opinion, makes Sanford a bad choice to run for president in the future. Not necessarily the affair, but going away without telling his staff where he was or how to reach him. Yes, he’s a Republican; and as such will come in for a LOT more criticism from Democrats where such actions only get support and excuses for Democrats similarly afflicted. They’ve always defended Clinton, saying his “sex life is not our business.” But it IS when he practices it on OUR TIME, and in a government office while important visitors waited in the outer office. Other Democrats have been similarly caught, and Democrats have always defended them, But they won’t this time because Sanford is a Republican. (Yahoo News)

I'm Baaack!

The liberals can return to being nervous about me while I continue to tell the truth about them, which they hate. I have buried my brother and interacted with my family. The next time I go there I hope it’s not for a funeral. Not even my own. He’s in a much better place, now. I am now the “patriarch” of the family and, though I didn’t want the job, I’m going to keep it as long as I can. Bob and Rick (my next younger brother) are responsible for me doing what I’m doing today after insisting I read Ayn Rand’s “Atlas Shrugged.” While Bob introduced me to Rush Limbaugh. The first time I ever listened to him was while sitting on Bob’s porch. Rest easy, Bob. I’m going to carry on the work as long as I can.

Obama "Running" the Media

A recent ABC show touting Obama’s “universal health care” (filmed IN the white House) not only would not allow opposing views to be aired as part of the show, it refused ADVERTISING from people who opposed it. The “system” the media TELLS us is that BOTH SIDES of every issue MUST be shown in EVERY story, but they’re not even “going through the MOTIONS” of doing that in this show. If this is what we can expect in an Obama administration, I’m going to sell my television set. (Drudge Report)

Iran; Beginnings of a Revolution?

They’re “rioting in the streets” in Iran over the stolen election of Ahmadinijerk. Iran first restricted foreign journalists to their offices during the demonstrations to keep them from filming them. Then they “threw them out of the country” altogether. Meanwhile, demonstrations continued apace, with cops beating demonstrators with their billies and shooting some. The Mullahs have promised a “partial recount,” whatever that means (probably meant they will only recount votes FOR their candidate). Will they be overthrown? Will Ahmadinijerk be imprisoned, or even shot (as sometimes happens when dictators get overthrown)? (Fox News)

Obama: "Stuff It!"

Iranian “President” Ahmadinijerk is demanding an apology from America for “interfering” in their presidential election. You know, the one where the Mullahs “fixed it” so he would “win in a landslide? The one where 120% of the population voted? The one where they promised to recount “some” of the votes (the ones that WERE for Ahmadjinijerk, of course)? The one that was protested by thousands of citizens, some of whom they shot and killed? That one. The one Obama has been “going out of his way to AVOID interfering in. Obama just answered his demand. He said, “stuff it, jerk!” Not in those words, but what he said had that meaning. The wimp stands up! I’m surprised. I expected him to apologize for something we never did, as he has been doing in speeches given all over the world. I guess the difference here is, he would be apologizing for something HE is supposed to have done. He’s not hesitant to apologize for something somebody ELSE has done, but when it’s something HE is supposed to have done, forget it. (Just common sense)

So What else is New?

The liberals have been wrong on most issues, and thus have unnecessarily screwed up this country. They’re “wrong again” about global warming (they now call it "climate change," since the globe is NOT "warming" and hasn't been since 2000), and their “solutions” are wrong, too. “Global warming alarmists are incessantly preaching the virtues of mass transit and condemning as evil the cars most of us get around in. Turns out their paradigm is a bit flawed. Initially, these groups wanted cars off the roads and replaced with mass transit under the pretense that they emitted too much pollution. Now the environmentalists and their allied policymakers are saying that automobile use should be limited because their engines discharge carbon dioxide [I guess we should also ban all humans, as well, for the same reason. –RT]. This, according to the eco-faith, is causing global warming, even though there's no scientific evidence, just an assumption based on "computer models", to back up the claim. Herding large numbers of commuters into buses and trains has been a goal of environmentalist groups for some time. They tend not to like cars because cars represent freedom and independence from central planners. They especially loathe SUVs because they see them as symbols of crass wealth and excessive consumption.” But unfortunately, the lack of proof or THEIR assumptions is not all there is: there is also proof that the OPPOSITE is true, but they suppress that. Their “Pope,” AlGore, is “living high on the hog” because so many people “buy” this garbage while their “solutions” are increasing basic living costs for ALL of us. (IBD Editorials)

Ignoring the Obvious

Many people actively ignore what Obama is doing to this country. They REFUSE to read blogs such as mine; they REFUSE to listen to Rush Limbaugh, Glenn Beck, or Sean Hannity (who speak common sense), believing the crap liberals put out about them in the liberal media, to which they cannot avoid listening. Meanwhile, the liberal media is kvetching about the one or two SMALL “beachheads” conservatives have made in the media, such as Fox News and a couple of “less-than-liberal” newspapers that somehow cling to life (while their readership is GROWING at the same time it is DWINDLING for the liberal outlets). They “see the handwriting on the wall,” their destruction,” and cry about it (trying to legislate censorship), while refusing to admit the reasons why: Americans are tired of reading and hearing their liberal crap, and are “voting with their feet.” They won’t be back, even if they’re successful in “shutting up” their “less-than-liberal” competition. Hopefully, it is in time, and the liberal media will die, while leaving that ”small beachhead” intact. (Just common sense)

I Won't Be Here

I may not get to post much this week. My brother died last Monday, making me the (unwilling) patriarch of the Thomas family. I will be obligated first with trying to get the money to go home and help bury him, then with what happens there. I hope I make it. Bob and my younger brother Rick are responsible for what I'm doing today, since they were the ones who insisted I read "Atlas Shrugged," the book that opened my eyes ans allowed me to "read between the lines" in the lying national press. I think he may be "haranguing" God to do something about Obama and his scams and schemes.

GOP Votes Passed "Cap & Trade"

The vote totals were 219 for, 212 against. Eight Republicans voted FOR the bill. The difference was 7; which means it was the Republican votes which put it “over the top. So without the Republican votes in FAVOR of the bill, it would not have passed. I guess those Republicans are the ones most easily fooled, because they ARE fools. This bill, if it becomes law, will pout a LOT of money in the pockets of many of Obama’s friends, and therefore into the pockets also of Obama AND his friends, while taking a lot of money OUT of OUR pockets. Why the hell do we have TWO parties if they vote the same? Don’t they know we’re going to hold them responsible for this vote in the next election? (Just common sense)

They're Forgetting Something

A “Democrat spokesman” on Fox (you know, that RIGHT-wing bastion) is FINALLY talking about the GOVERNMENT forcing lenders to loan money to deadbeats as the DIRECT CAUSE of our current financial problems. But he conveniently forgot (as usual) to mention that it was a DEMOCRAT administration (Jimmy Carter) that passed the original law (Citizen’s Reinvestment Act of 1976), another Democrat administration that strengthened it (Clinton) and two Democrat presidents that signed the laws. Without saying so, he intimated that it was the REPUBLICANS who were at fault. But then, this particular “Democrat spokesman” is good at that. (Just common sense)

Illegal Parking!

In your own driveway! In Toledo, Ohio, they CAN ticket you for parking in your own driveway, based not on a law or even a REGULATION, but on a simple MEMO. Where the hell they get the idea they have the power to ticket somebody for parking on their own property is beyond me. I guess it’s a good thing I don’t live in Toledo (although I used to). I’ll lay odds the “powers that be” in Toledo are liberal Democrats. That’s where all the stupid things are done (where liberals "rule"). I looked all over the Toledo web site, but NOWHERE did they reveal hizzonor's political affiliation. Are they afraid for anybody to know it? Sounds a LOT like a Democrat to me. (Fox Toledo)

"Atlas Shrugged" Flourishing

“ATLAS SHRUGGED” FLOURISHING: Why now, fifty years after she wrote it? Maybe it’s because more and more people are seeing “the wisdom of her words” in a world where the president is talking about ”bulldozing blighted areas” to “make us ‘shrink’ in size to have a chance to "rest" and is making other socialistic moves apace, while spending TRILLIONS of dollars we don’t have. Maybe they see a world in which the “forced altruists” are “ruling us” through deception and swindles and they see similarities with Ayn Rand’s “Atlas Shrugged” world. I certainly do. Meanwhile liberals put Rush Limbaugh AND Ayn Rand down in a desperate attempt to keep us from recognizing their scams. Rush Limbaugh speaks COMMON SENSE, which is what makes them “wet their pants.” So does Sarah Palin, which is why they’re trying so hard to discredit her so she can’t “beat them at their own game” in 2012. If you don’t know what I’m talking about, go buy a copy of “Atlas Shrugged,” which is still available at book stores, though I’ve had a problem finding USED copies because people don’t get rid of it after reading it. (The Atlasphere)

"Free" Health Care?

Sure. But it’s not free. It might be “free” to the user if the government is “paying” for it. But it’s NOT “free." SOMEBODY has to pay for it, and if it’s the GOVERNMENT, it’s YOU. Glenn Beck was asked if HE was in favor of “free health care,” and he answered “yes.” IF it WAS “free.” His answer: “Yes. Yes, if we could somehow or another come up with a magic healthcare bean that sprouted doctors, sprays and surgical procedures for free, who's not there? Of course I'm there. I don't mean free when you go to the doctor's office. I mean no cost TO the doctor's office and no cost via taxes, completely free. Healthcare, growing on a magic healthcare beanstalk. So of what possible value is it to even ask that question? Don't you think we should start questioning like the 30% that said no to absolutely free healthcare? My question is this: Medicare is broke. already it's necessary for them to start replacing the billions they stole for the general fund from the "Social Security Fund." So how are they going to pay for it? More and bigger taxes, and printing more money, that's how. (Just common sense)

I'm a Hawk

Liberals Call me a “hawk,” because I say, “Fine; make a “surgical strike” on that pot-bellied dictator in N. Korea, or on Ahmadinijad. Failing that, drop a nuke on his capital city (either on of them).” I’m not like liberals. After somebody threatens me a certain number of times, I’m “ready to go to war.” I get tired of being threatened by “tiny little men” very quickly. Both these jerks have been acting like they think they can WIN a war with the United States. If they throw a SINGLE nuke at ANYBODY, we can, and WILL make a steaming pile out of their countries and not feel a bit bad about it. Yes, a lot of innocent people will die. But that’s THEIR fault, not ours. They cannot impute fault on us while making empty threats. Maybe their people can “rise up” and eliminate these insane jerks. If they don’t, it’s on THEIR heads, not ours. (Just common sense)

Predictions and Truth

President (then candidate) Johnson said, “If you vote for Goldwater, we’ll be fully involved in Viet Nam in six months." So they voted for Johnson and we were fully involved in Viet Nam in six months. Obama said, “If we don’t vote in this stimulus package, we’ll soon have 9% PLUS unemployment. So they voted the stimulus package in, and we now (at this writing) have 9.2% unemployment. I really enjoy watching these Democrat politicians predicting the future. (Just common sense)

Killing Off the "Old Folks?"

Is this what Obama is saying we should do to save money? Recently he said as much: “Obama said during the ABC Special on Wednesday night [as this is written –RT] that a way to save healthcare costs is to abandon the sort of care that “evidence shows is not necessarily going to improve” the patient’s health. He went on to say that he had personal familiarity with such a situation when his grandmother broke her hip after she was diagnosed with terminal cancer. Obama offered a question on the efficacy of further care for his grandmother saying, “and the question was, does she get hip replacement surgery, even though she was fragile enough they were not sure how long she would last?” Does this mean his government will not “approve” treatment I may need because I’m 72 years old, and thus it will probably not help me for long? Who decides how long is long? (Red State/Warner Todd)

We Were Founded in Freedom

Do you wonder why this nation has surpassed countries that have been around for hundreds, even THOUSANDS of years and have become the richest and most powerful country in the world in less than 300 years? It’s a simple answer: it’s because we were founded on LIBERTY and FREEDOM. It is CAPITALISM and the "profit motive," not socialism, that has made us strong. But Obama wants to get us away from all that. He wants us to “walk away” from what has made us great and TOWARD a system that has FAILED every time it has been tried. For those current socialist countries such as Communist China, Cuba, Venezuela, etc., it’s only a matter of time. It won’t be long now. As the United States “fades” in importance and loses the ability to “support” such regimes, they will fail, one by one, or maybe all together. (Just common sense)

All Our Troubles Are Over!

Obama is in charge! “Well, I'm glad that's over! Now that our silver-tongued president has gone to Cairo to soothe Muslims' hurt feelings, they love us again! Muslims in Pakistan expressed their appreciation for President Barack Obama's speech by bombing a fancy hotel in Peshawar this week.” And they’ll tell us again, over and over, how much they love us as the days and weeks go on. The seas will go back down, the ice caps will again be safe, and all our other problems will cease to be problems. It must be true! Obama SAYS it! Bulldroppings! Nothing that comes out of Obama’s mouth is true. You can tell what the truth is by seeing what is just the opposite of what Obama says. My only comment on his Cairo speech is, “God help us!” (Ann Coulter)

Climate of Stupidity

That’s what we have had in Washington since Obama and his henchmen were elected and appointed. COW FARTS: They say cow farts create more pollution than all the autos in the world and want to tax them; NUCLEAR IDIOCY: With insane dictators around the world nearing acquisition of nuclear devices, Obama wants us to “get out of the nuclear business and leave us defenseless; KILLING COAL: He has PROMISED to “bankrupt the coal industry,” one of the BASIC industries necessary to our survival; “MAKING NICE” ON TERRORISTS: The only thing I can say about his speech in Cairo is, “God help us!” “WAR? WHAT WAR? He doesn’t even believe we’re at war with an ideology that tells its adherents to KILL those who don’t believe the same way they do;

SPENDING SPREE: He spent more in his first THREE WEEKS than this country has spent since its inception! He is printing money so fast that soon we will be in a “double-digit inflation,” which is “secret theft” from us and our descendants since every dollar he prints with nothing behind it makes money now in existence worth less. Everything he has done since he was elected (with the possible exception of reversing Bush’s ban on financing for embryonic stem cell research) is STUPID. Will we survive his stupidities? Maybe not, if we don’t cut him short by making him a “one-term president” or even IMPEACH him. This differs from the “systemic hatred” of George Bush by liberals, who could not coherently say WHY they hated him. I don’t HATE him. And as with Bill Clinton, I CAN. I just have no USE for him and am AFRAID of what’s coming with him and his henchmen in charge. (Just common sense)

Computer Lost Its Mind

If anybody's worried about me, quit it. I'm not sick; my computer is. It apparently "lost its mind" last Sunday and I've been trying to get it fixed ever since. The result is that I now have a computer with more memory (the same one, just more memory), an "empty" hard drive and a "slave" hard drive with all my old files on it. Since I'm an inveterate "backer-upper," I didn't lose anything important and even though it's still doing some strange things, it does work (mostly).

Democrats Protecting Pedophiles

They’re working hard to pass the obviously misnamed "Local Law Enforcement Hate Crimes Prevention Act." Which more descriptively could be called the “Pedophile Protection Act.” They know they can’t get such an irrational law passed “up front,” so now they’re trying to get it added as an “unnamed attachment” to another “must-pass” bill (that’s how they pass unpopular or ignorant bills into law “under the table.”). This bill, if it becomes law, will make a “protected class” of, among other things, Incest - sex with one's offspring (a crime, of course); Necrophilia - sexual relations with a corpse, also a crime; Pedophilia - sex with an underage child, another crime. Most of these actions are ALREADY against the law, but Democrats want to “protect” such people and won’t hear of excluding ANY of the categories, including pedophilia. Could it be because they fear being exposed? I don’t want to suggest that any of them ARE pedophiles, but their determination to make pedophiles a “protected class” is somewhat suspicious to me. (Just common sense)

Obama Lies, Press Swears to It

Recently he told us he “saved or created” 150,000 jobs (whatever THAT means) while the jobless numbers were 9.2% (later 9.4%), the highest it has been in recent years with double-digit unemployment soon to be in our future. Then the press trumpeted it all over; except for the Wall Street Journal, which published a story with the title, “The Media Falls for Phony Jobs Claims,” and shows that Obama’s claims are pure fiction. They’re “made-up numbers” and the “state-run media” does not even question them. No demands for proof. They just print it, right out of the man Evan Thomas (Time Magazine) called “A God.” It amazes me that he thinks we’re ignorant enough to believe that, but he’s right. Those who “don’t pay attention to politics” will. (Wall Street Journal)

The Liberal Way of Thinking

This is an informative poem by someone who knows what's going on: “They want power over all of us./ And they want the money to do it;/ Meanwhile we do our thing,/Paying attention when we get around to it./They don't care whose lives they ruin/While they make laws to control us;/They go their merry way/With our own money they dole us/So we'll continue to vote/To keep the money coming;/While they snare us more fully/And we contribute to our own undoing.” This poem was written by someone whose name I’ve never known, but it puts things very well. If you know who wrote it, please let me know so I can give him/her proper credit. (Just common sense)

"Taser Death"

“TASER DEATH”: Twice in recent days people have been shocked and have died. The “quick” judgment is that the shock killed him. That is impossible. Stun guns cannot kill. There isn’t enough AMPERAGE to do so. I’d bet that when the autopsy results are in, it will be discovered that both these people had underlying medical problems that killed them, not the stun gun. Of course, family members will not accept this, as the stun gun is a “convenient target.” They’ll say the medical examiner is “part of the system” and ruled to “save” the cop who stunned him. MEs don’t operate that way. They find what’s there and report it. Maybe that has happened in the past, but it’s not “common.” Medical Examiners are THERE as an “oversight” to the cops, and anybody else who might kill someone, accidentally or on purpose. In one case, the man fell to his death AFTER being stunned, but the press STILL called his death as CAUSED by being “tazed.”

I’ll wait until I find out just what killed this man before I blame the stun gun the cop used. (Update: now it has come to light [thanks to Fox News] that he was on a ledge, high above the street when he was shocked, and FELL to his death. He died of “head trauma” caused by his fall. A police lieutenant and the cop who shocked him at a very bad time have been relieved of duty. It was NOT the stun gun that killed him, news reports notwithstanding). Nonetheless, news reports still say this “has brought renewed focus to the use of Tasers by police.” Maybe they ought to teach them not to use them on people precariously perched on ledges, way above the street. One thing is sure: shooting him would not have been better. (Fox News)

Unions "Jumped the Line"

If someone jumped in front of you in line at the supermarket, what would you do? “In a rigged proceeding in which the federal government disregarded bankruptcy law in favor of the political outcome it desired, the Chrysler bankruptcy laid the predicate for the much larger General Motors bankruptcy to come. Against law and precedent, the unions were moved to the front of the line when it came to who would benefit from the bankruptcy.” That's what the unions did in the Chrysler bankruptcy. This is the “big payoff” to the Unions who donated MILLIONS to Obama and his accomplices. They flatly IGNORED the law and the courts went along with it. Again, we have a government made up of CRIMINALS from the top down (judiciary included). And, unlike those who hated Bush only because the Democrats told them to, but who could not tell you why, I KNOW why I have no use for Obama and his crowd. They have EARNED it. (Newt Gingrich Letter)

IS It A "Scandal?"

“There was a time when we would have called it a scandal. In 1921, oil tycoon Harry Sinclair gave several prize head of cattle and around $269,000 to President Harding’s Secretary of the Interior, Albert Fall. In return, Sinclair got the exclusive rights to drill in an oil field in Wyoming. Sinclair’s no-bid contract became the Teapot Dome scandal, the most notorious example of political corruption in America prior to Watergate. Between 2000 and 2008, the United Auto Workers (UAW) Union gave $23,675,562 to the Democratic Party and its candidates. In 2008 alone, the UAW gave $4,161,567 to the Democratic Party, including Barack Obama. In return, the UAW received 55 percent of Chrysler and 17.5 percent of GM, plus billions of dollars. But nobody’s calling this a scandal. It’s time we start.” (Newt Gingrich)

SHOULD we call it a scandal? The “state-run media” doesn’t think so. They’ve been instructed to view it as "business as usual" and something Obama “had to do for the good of the country.” But it’s not. It has been done for “the good of Obama and his accomplices.” It is the biggest swindle perpetrated upon the American people since AlGore‘s global warming. He had conned more money out of the American people than has ANYONE before him with this scam. IS it a “scandal?” The answer is a big YES! (Newt Gingrich Letter)

Surprise, Surprise!

David Letterman’s sleazy attack on Alaska Governor Sarah Palin is typical of the kind of things elite liberals do to the people they’re frightened of; and Sarah “scares the hell out of them.” If she runs in 2012, especially if she has the likes of Bobby Jindal as her running mate, and is not “muzzled” in what she can say, she’ll win in a landslide (a REAL one, not the kind of phony one they had in Iran). Unabashed conservatives, who RUN as conservatives, as Reagan did, DO “win big,” and that’s what makes liberals wet their pants. So they’re trying very hard to discredit her and make her a laughingstock. That’s their “modus operandi.” They don’t dispute her on the issues; they can’t. so they try to discredit her and get the country laughing at her with their snide jokes and lies. It’s not going to work. She won’t allow it, as McCain did by putting certain things “off limits” to try and “appease” Obama. (People)

"Obama is a God"

This is from the transcript of a TV show, and Time Magazine’s Evan Thomas is heard to say “Obama is like a God.” “VOICE: Well, we were the good guys in 1984. Hasn't felt that way in recent years. We're seen too often as a bad guys. And he is a very different job from Reagan was all about America, and he talked about it. Obama is, we are above that now. We're not just parochial, we're not just chauvinistic, we're not just provincial. We stand for something. I mean, in a way Obama's standing above the country, above the world. He's sort of God.” If nothing else will convince you just how deeply the media is “in the hole” for Obama, this ought to do it, unless you’re just stupid. I don’t think you’re stupid, so go to the original article and read. (Glenn Beck)

Based on Wrong Premise!

Ayn Rand says, “if you find a contradiction, check your premises.” The whole idea that GITMO prisoners are there FOR what they did is WRONG. They’re “prisoners of war” without Geneva Convention rights. They actually SHOULD have been shot where they stood when they found them on the field of battle. They’re NOT “criminals” entitled to trial. Under the rules of war they could have been executed on the spot, which we should have done, so there’d be no “controversy” over how we treat them. (Just common sense)

Domino Effect

If you think the Democrat-caused “economic slowdown” isn’t going to effect your life because you don’t have “investments,” think again. How do you think the loss of ALL chain stores in Detroit will affect the populace of Detroit? They’re gone because there is no longer an “auto-making business” in Detroit (to speak of) and thus thousands fewer possible customers, since they’re unemployed. And you can trace it all back to the “Citizen’s Reinvestment Act of 1976,” a Democrat-controlled Congress passed, Democrat president (Jimmy Carter) signed law FORCING lenders to loan money to deadbeats. This law was STRENGTHENED later by ANOTHER Democrat-controlled Congress, and THAT was signed into law by ANOTHER Democrat president (Bill Clinton). This law was an “exercise in stupidity” designed, and produced for the purpose of CREATING an “economic slowdown” toward the end of George Bush’s administration, creating an atmosphere in which Democrat Obama could be elected president (while nobody really knew what he stood for) and many other Democrats elected or re-elected to Congress, which, effectively created a “bloodless coup” that allowed the Democrats to “retake” the U. S. government so they could finish the job of making this into a socialist country.

Obama and his accomplices are working fast, spending money they don’t have like water, PRINTING money apace, (which will soon create double-digit inflation). Such inflation is a “hidden tax increase,” and is patent THEFT of America’s money since it makes every dollar in existence worth LESS. So even if you don’t have “investments,” you’re going to be effected by this, if nothing more than your “nest egg” (and all your other money) being worth a lot less when you go to use it. You’re also going to get massive tax increases, and don’t believe Obama’s lies when he says NOBODY with an income under $250,000 (or whatever number he’s using this week) will get one. Remember the government lyingly told us the federal INCOME tax would not be paid by more than 3% of the people, so as to “suck us into” allowing it. Now they’re auditing WAITRESSES and taxi drivers for a “cut” of their TIPS! Never believe the government when they say “only the rich will have to pay.” That’s a LOAD! And a BIG one. Our GRANDCHILDREN and THEIR grandchildren will have to pay for this. I keep writing this over and over, but get no response, even from "the choir," who are my audience. When are they going to realize (in Washington) that this is so and DO something about it? (Yahoo News/Finance)

"Collossal Ignorance"

We’re well into the (hopefully) one term of yet another fool (besides Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton) who blundered into the presidency because the Democrats thought he was “sufficiently dumb” to do what they wanted, which was make this into a socialist nation. But they didn’t contend with the DEPTH of his stupidity and he’s scaring THEM to death as much as he is us. One example: with insane dictators all over the world gaining nuclear capability, he wants to “get out of the nuclear business. What a “glittering jewel of colossal ignorance!” Liberals the world over HATED George Bush with a passion, but could not say WHY (It's because he HURT their efforts to "socialize" this nation). But that’s not a problem with us. He has given us many reasons to have no use for him. (Just common sense)

"Limited" Recount

The Mullahs have "authorized" a "limited recount" of the vote from their recent election, which Ahmadinijerk sto. . .won. What does THAT mean? It means “recounting” all the votes FOR Ahminidinijerk while discarding all those against him. They’re doing it to placate those hundreds of thousands of demonstrators against him, some of which they killed. I think they were surprised at the sheer STRENGTH of the opposition. So they “ordered up” yet ANOTHER “demonstration, this time FOR Ahmadjinijerk, where NO ONE was killed. Anybody with any intelligence at all knows Ahmadinijerk was the CHOICE of the Mullahs, so you can depend on his “winning.” Now they have to “show” the dissidents he has a lot of “support.” I can’t believe they think people living OUTSIDE of Iran buy this bullderm. Maybe they’ve been “in charge” too long and they have started believing their own lies, as Obama has already done. I think it's instructive that people in Iran are SO "fed up" they'll risk DEATH in order to cause a change. Then they "muzzled" the press. "Authorities restricted journalists, including Iranians working for foreign media from reporting on the streets, and said they could only work from their offices, conducting telephone interviews and monitoring official sources such as state television." ONLY "official sources." No actual witnesses to government killings. (Yahoo News/AP)

Does He Care?

Obama can’t fire an Inspector General. Not without giving 30 day’s notice and explaining to Congress why. But he did, with no explanation to anybody because this IG was investigating one of his friends (can't have that). People have criticized him for this, but he doesn’t care. He’s “our ruler.” Nobody seems to be able to touch him because nobody ELSE cares what outrages he commits. They’re still too busy licking his boots to notice his excesses. Will somebody do something concrete because of this? Doubtful. That’s how he gets away with things. Nobody cares. Nobody brings charges against him. So he doesn’t care, either. (Rush Limbaugh)

22 "Czars"

22 “CZARS”: It took Russia 400 years to amass 22 “czars.” It only took Obama a few months. They will control EVERYTHING about you. The latest of which is the “pay czar” who will tell your boss how much (or how little) he can pay you. Do you want some “faceless bureaucrat” to be able to CONTROL your pay and a lot of other things? Get RID of Obama and his accomplices before he is able to institute a socialist government that CAN control you, ABSOLUTELY. That’s what he’s after, and if you don’t get him OUT of there, he will do it. I probably won’t be around to see it, but my children and their children will, and I don’t want that. Nor do I want them to pay high taxes to pay for Obama’s mistakes. (Just common sense)

Obama's "Plan" for GM

He says he “doesn’t want to own General Motors.” But he now DOES own 60% of it. He says he “doesn’t want to RUN General Motors.” But he IS “running” General Motors. He SAYS YOU “own” that 60%, but he’s lying. Just TRY and tell GM what to do. Just TRY and get a “dividend from your “ownership.” Just TRY to become a member of the board (that’s reserved for Obama’s friends). He says he plans to “reduce it to a manageable (by him) size through bankruptcy." To do so, he’s telling thousands of profitable dealers to “go to hell.” GM is not “buying back” any inventory so those dealers he’s RUINING are STUCK with it unless they can get it sold before the deadline. Look for most of those dealers to become dealers for foreign brands, and for the percentage of the market foreign brands hold to increase markedly. Is THIS his “plan” to make things better for GM and the nation? Common sense tells me it is NOT. In addition, he is insisting on them making cars nobody wants—which is, as usual, a “recipe for disaster.” But Obama doesn’t mind; he was ELECTED because of the Democrat’s “recipe for disaster” in FORCING lenders to make loans they KNEW would never be repaid. (Yahoo News/AP)

"Turribl Torture!"

Boy! Did we really hurt those Chinese Islamic terrorists Obama just released in Bermuda! Remember the pictures of John McCain while in captivity? When he came home it took him a long time to get his life and body back to near normal. These former Gitmo prisoners the liberals think were tortured are swimming in the ocean in the Carribbean two days after being released. Just a note: Bermuda is British territory. But Obama didn’t ask Britain for their permission to send these terrorists there. He just sent them, and at OUR expense (as usual). Notice they said their "worst moments came" when we allowed Chinese communists to question them. Apparently, they're now "on vacation" in Bermuda at U. S. expense until the world forgets about them, at which time they'll go back to "war" against the U. S. and kill a few more innocent people, some of them children. (Rush Limbaugh)

Lyting Accusations

This is only ONE of the lying accusations being made about Alaska Governor Sarah Palin: “Blogger Geoffrey Dunn, who is writing a book about Palin, accused the former Republican vice presidential candidate of lifting phrases and ideas at length from an article Gingrich co-wrote in 2005.” Only problem is, Palin plainly told her audience where the quotes came from, and Newt has no problem with her use of his material. He wishes more people would do it. This is typical of the kind of baseless accusations you will find in the “Huffington Post” and other liberal blogs. It is the kind of thing the liberals commonly use to attack ANY conservative that frightens them, as Sarah does. If she runs in 2012, especially if Bobby Jindal as her running mate, she’ll win in a landslide. That’s what frightens them so much. Reagan proved that a CONSERVATIVE who RUNS as a “conservative (not as ‘liberal-lite’),” will win in a landslide every time. They know it, though they’ll never ADMIT it, so she frightens them and makes them wet their pants. This guy only made this post to get publicity for his lying book while hoping to hurt Sarah.(News Max)

Stopping Mass Shootings

Laws prohibiting guns will not do it. Those wishing to commit mass murder do not obey laws that say they “can’t come in here armed.” This article gives a long list of schools where shooters have come in armed, where guns are specifically prohibited, and killed people. These killers could be pretty sure nobody there would be armed and able to kill HIM. “Guns were specifically not allowed on the premises by official policy or by law. Some locations have specific legal prohibitions, while others rely only on ‘company policy.’ Murderers will ignore signs telling them that something is prohibited. Clearly, if the state prohibits guns on campus, the good people will obey and leave their guns at home. But quite clearly, these signs did not dissuade the killers. Think about it. The only people obeying the law and the signs were the good people...the victims.” We need to allow RESPONSIBLE PEOPLE in these schools to be able to carry a gun (if they wish) so such shooters will not know whether or not there will be someone there who is armed and able to stop him as there was in Colorado Springs, Colorado when a shooter who had already killed that day came in shooting. A female parishioner shot him (and, knowing it was ‘all over,” he killed himself) and only two people there died. (Examiner)

Usinng Children to Attacki

People wonder why I say Islamic terrorists have NO CLAIM to ANY “rights.” They’re using CHILDREN and WOMEN to attack us. "At least five suspects ages 14 to 19 have been involved in grenade and suicide attacks in recent weeks in northern Iraq, according to the statement. The military has frequently said it believes Al Qaeda in Iraq and other insurgent groups are recruiting children and women because of their ability to avoid scrutiny and evade heightened security measures. But Saturday's statement was the first to provide detailed allegations of specific teenage attackers in what the military called 'a growing trend of children carrying out attacks on Iraqi security and U.S. forces.' " People who use CHILDREN and WOMEN to attack others have NO CLAIM to any “rights.” They should be shot on sight, as is legal in wartime when you find someone wearing NO uniform, but trying to kill people anyway. (Fox News)

Obama doesn't Like Jews

It’s easy to see. Just look at his foreign policy. He goes over to the Middle East and extols the “virtues” of Islamics. He gives “faint praise” to Jews and criticizes those who say the “holocaust” didn’t happen. But he pointedly left Israel OFF his itinerary. He demands that Israel stop building their “settlements” while ignoring what the (Islamic) Palestinians have done to Israelis. When Palestinians kill Jews, the world ignores it. But when Israel FINALLY retaliates, the world (led by Obama) accuses the JEWS of “atrocities.” Israel has “bent over” many times to the Palestinians and many times have OFFERED them their “homeland,” but they have rejected it. They just want Israel GONE and all Jews dead. Obama is clearly taking the side of the Palestinians. It is obvious to those who “pay attention.” (Just common sense)

Somebody Has to Die

In most bureaucracies, someone has to DIE before they’ll do necessary things. In Florida, when I was a paramedic, we came on a bunch of cops with a man in cardiac arrest, whom they would not allow us to touch OR transport because we were out of our zone, returning from (a block away) a hospital run. The “zone ambulance” was seven miles away. The man died waiting. I saw to it the Emergency “czar” there was removed and the law changed so the paramedic in charge could ORDER transfer in such cases AFTER this man died. In Washington, DC, the guards at the Holocaust Museum repeatedly asked for bullet-proof vests because of the possibility of violence from “Jew-haters.” They were refused, or “stonewalled.” Now a guard has been shot and killed. Look for the bureaucracy to hurriedly issue bullet-proof vests and the bureaucrats to claim credit for “protecting our security officers” after this man was killed. (Just common sense)

War? What War?

Our new president, Barack Hussein Obama, doesn’t think we are “at war” with Islamic terrorists. He is now calling it a “man-caused disaster” or something equally as insipid and stupid. He still thinks Iraq was “an unnecessary war” and “not part of the war on terror.” This is a term he refuses to use any more, and has so advised (ordered) the liberal media not to use. He might begin to believe it when an Islamic terrorist puts a bullet in him (or blows him to flinders) the next time he visits the Middle East (or even while he is in the White House). How one man could be so ignorant and still gain the presidency is still beyond me (He was elected by those who "pay no attention to politics" and therefore know nothing about him). He worries more over how we “treat” the Islamic terrorists we have captured than how THEY treat their captives. We “play silly little games” with them while they BEHEAD us. I hope we survive his presidency and that his admirers come to their senses sooner, rather than later. (Just common sense)

Afraid to "Offend"

Apparently everybody in New York is so deathly afraid of “offending” ANYBODY they have now published a list of 200 WORDS that cannot be used in ads for real estate. Among them are “family friendly,” “exclusive,” “easy walking distance,” “no smoking,” family-sized,” “working,” and “couples.” Has anybody in New York heard of the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States? If I were a real estate broker in New York, I’d tell them to “stick their list where the sun doesn’t shine” and DEFY them to do something about it. If that’s “offensive,” tough cookies. (Just common sense)

"You Scare Me"

This is an open letter from the former Vice-President of Proctor and Gamble that was not only not printed by the New York Times, it wasn’t even acknowledged. But somehow it got onto the Internet and has gotten more than half-million “hits.” I wish Obama would get a chance to see it, but I’d bet his “minions” will work overtime to KEEP him from seeing it for fear of “hurting his feelings.” I didn’t much like Jimmy Carter because he was “Obama lite.” So was Clinton. But we survived both. We may NOT “survive” Obama. Read this letter and be scared . . . very scared. He makes many very good points including the final one, which is that if Obama gets re-elected in 2012, he might be imprisoned or killed for writing a letter such as this. (Lou Pritchett)

Hiding the Truth

That is Obama’s purpose in insisting we no longer use the term, “war on terror.” The phrase is actually now a misnomer. Iraq and Afghanistan have been rebranded the "Overseas Contingency Operation," and lawyers are being deployed to fight the real battles. What the hell does THAT mean? He and his henchmen, and the “willing liberal media” can stop using that term if they want, but I’m not going to. I “call a spade a spade.” (And that has NOTHING to do with race). I call things what they ARE. Not what Obama wants me to call them to obfuscate the fact that we ARE “at war with Islamic EXTREMISTS.” Does he really think he can hide the fact that we ARE at war with a large portion of the “Muslim world” as they go about gaily murdering innocent people to make their obscure points? What a stupid JERK Obama is! (IBD Editorials)

Known by His Friends or Enemies

Hugo Chavez (communist dictator in Venezuela) HATED George Bush with a passion, but cheers every time Obama does something to move us further toward socialism. That, to me, is “telling.” You can often be judged by the people who hate you, or who love you. Obama is moving us ever closer to being a socialist nation. Every day, he nationalizes another industry or “takes over” running one business or another. Sometimes with fanfare, other times without. His "taking over" of General Motors has "awed" Chavez. The fact that Chavez loves Obama tells me a lot, even if I didn’t already know he is a dedicated socialist. (IBD Editorials)

Worse Than Cow Farts

“Just when you thought measuring and taxing bovine butt emissions was as silly as government meddling with your livestock could get; We can file this one under Astronomically Expensive and Unnecessary Crap. And cross file it under New World Order Advocates On Crack.” Did you laugh when we told you the government wanted to measure and tax “cow farts?” I did. But they were deadly serious, as are most liberals when they propose something stupid. Now they want farmers to PAY for GPS positioning of every cow on your land. Talk about an “unfunded mandate!” Like Rush Limbaugh says, “Liberals are funny when they’re out of power, but DANGEROUS when they GET power.” Liberal blogs will probably accuse me of plagiarism for quoting Rush as they did when Sara Palin quoted Newt Gingrich. (Elizabeth Crum)

Martyr? Not Even!

Was Dr. Tiller (the “late-term abortion doctor”) a murderer, or a martyr? That is the question many ask, and the answer is easy. No (Though late-term abortion supporters will probably try and make him one). He was a “serial killer” who only killed defenseless infants, (mostly) still in the womb. A person many people used instead of a condom (Funny, since condoms are cheaper). They had unprotected sex without worrying; they could always kill the result. But that doesn’t mean I agree that he should be murdered himself. If this country would follow logical law, he would be imprisoned for the rest of his natural life; or even executed, but UNDER THE LAW. Not by a “vigilante.” What I’m talking about is people who use the murder of the result in place of a condom when having sex. I don’t mean those with REAL problems that would mean a short, bad life for the child and unnecessary medical expenses for a child that won’t live very long, anyway and will live in constant pain. But Dr. Tiller didn’t limit his practice to those people. He did late-term abortions for all comers (though his defenders will insist otherwise). I don’t condone his murder, but I wonder why it was so long in coming. Violence to answer violence “doesn’t compute.” You don’t kill somebody to stop killing, unless you’re the law. Watch for the "anti-gun crazies" to use this shooting to promote more stupid "anti-gun laws," as if such laws would stop such shootings. (One News Now)

Obama Destroying Auto Industry

He won’t admit it, but his actions are creating a situation in which many reliable dealers for AMERICAN cars will become dealerships for FOREIGN cars. As he forces the removal of franchises that have belonged to successful auto dealers for years (causing them to lose BILLIONS of dollars), that leaves them open to become dealers for, and sell FOREIGN cars. This allows foreign automakers to take a bigger portion of the auto sales market in the United States. Is THIS what he thinks will improve the economy? What an IDIOT! (Yahoo News/AP)

"World Without Nukes"

That’s what Obama said in Saudi Arabia. Just as if that were possible. If ONE nuclear bomb exists, anywhere in the world, the country (or person) who controls it will control the world. And there is NO WAY you would be able to destroy EVERY nuclear device in existence. To think so shows a lot of ignorance. Israel is CERTAINLY not going to give up its nuclear capability; not with Iran threatening to “push them into the sea,” while OWNING nukes (which will happen soon if they’re not stopped). You can’t “unilaterally” disarm and “get rid of” your nukes. As soon as you do, those who still DO have nukes will destroy you. There are way too many “crazies” like Ahmadinijerk who DO have nukes, or will soon. Then there is Kim Jong Il, who DOES. It's reminiscent of the "anti-gun freaks'" idea that to defend yourself against illegally-armed criminals, you must disarm YOURSELF.(Just common sense)

Going Off Half-Cocked

At Princeton University recently, they shut down the campus, sent out e-mail mass messages, and wasted hours of the cop’s time conducting a search, all because somebody saw someone with a toy plastic gun. I expect soon to hear that “authorities” are demanding even tighter anti-gun laws in response to this. I guess they will figure if a TOY gun can trigger such a response, they ought to ban it, too. This is how the “anti-gun freaks” “gin up” reasons to make new laws against gun ownership and concealed carry. They figure if ANYBODY has a gun in his possession, he’s going to kill somebody. They don’t know ANYTHING about personal responsibility and self-control because they don’t have it. Turns out it was a couple of kids (They made sure everyone knew were from "off-campus" and had no connection to the university) playing "cops and robbers." (Just common sense)

"Accidentally" Releasing Top Secrets

How does a presumably competent federal government “accidentally” release “confidential information” about the location of storage of nuclear fuel and other information that will help our enemies kill us easier? Our government is so incompetent it “gives our enemies a road map” to where sensitive information or equipment is. Their excuse is, “It was mostly already on the Internet, anyway. We just put it all together in one place.” Huh? That’s supposed to “make it all well?” Did this action make it a LOT easier for our enemies to “target” sensitive installations? They’re not only incompetent in WHAT they release, but in their “excuses” offered, too! When the first act of domestic terrorism happens since 9/11 and after Bush left office, look for it to be on one of these now easily targeted installations. Watch for them to blame Bush. (Just common sense)

"Bailouts" Did Not work

And never will. Obama’s trillion dollar bailout spending spree is a desperate attempt to bring their own scam under control before it COMPLETELY destroys us. But the Keynesian Economics theory under which it is being done is completely flawed and doesn’t work. Keynes said, among other things, that to bring us out of a recession or depression, government must spend more money. If that means spending more than it has, no matter. Print some. WRONG! The GM bankruptcy, after all the money Obama gave them supposedly to “forestall bankruptcy” is evidence. Chrysler is IN bankruptcy and is desperately trying to sell itself to Fiat to bring itself OUT of bankruptcy. It is a MYTH that people will not buy cars from a company in bankruptcy. They will, and do. Obama’s crowd CAUSED the “economic slowdown” that put the whole country in economic trouble by FORCING lenders to loan money to people who could NOT repay it, thereby setting us up for disaster, just so they could “take over” the government with a “bloodless coup.” (What is there about that people don’t understand?)They succeeded. But now they’re trying to stop the “steamroller” they started rolling before it destroys us, but they’re doing it with an outdated and flawed economic theory that has been long discredited and it’s not going to work. It’s ALREADY too late, and the American people will soon “throw them out” and not elect another Democrat in my lifetime if they “wake up” in time. If SO, they’ve destroyed the Democrat Party for all time. “Hello, Whigs.” (Just common sense)

Shutting Them Up

Those against “universal health care” want to run an ad explaining their position, but their opponents; those IN FAVOR of “universal health care” (which includes Obama and his fellow swindlers) want to stop them from running it. They want to “shut them up,” and “end the debate.” "When thuggery replaces debate in the political process, society suffers. There is no room in an advanced civilization for tribal conflicts. Competing ideas should be sorted out in the light, not snuffed out by intimidation. But that is exactly what a coalition organization called "Democracy for America" [which is just the opposite of what they're working for -RT] is trying to do. A group named ‘Conservatives for Patients' Rights’ has bought time on Washington, D.C.'s NBC 4 to air a 30-minute broadcast Sunday after 'Meet the Press.' The group describes it as a '60 Minutes'-style documentary' that will 'let people see the very real consequences of letting the government take over their health care decisions.' We haven't seen the program, which has already run on the History Channel, A&E Network and ION, and focuses on the 'stalling, waiting lists and rationing and withholding care because of red tape, politics, and bureaucratic foot-dragging' that distinguish the government-run health care systems elsewhere, particularly Great Britain and Canada. So we don't know how the points are presented. But we are aware of those systems' failures and have repeatedly listed them on these pages. Many Americans, however, are ignorant of the rationing and nasty waiting lists that are responsible for poor health and even fatalities in nations with socialist health care systems. And "Democracy for America" [sic] wants to keep them that way." That’s obvious, else why would they want to stop it from being broadcast? (IBD Editorials)

Covernment Tells You when You Can Smile

I think it is California where they bar you from smiling when they take your picture for a driver's license. I'm surprised they think they need this ban because (they say) "facial recognition software" can better recognize you if you aren't smiling. In California, I'm sure not very many people WANT to smile with the highest tax base in the nation, the highest unemployment numbers, and their governor threatening to cut off funds for police and fire services instead of that for studying the sex life of the Tse-tse Fly, while companies are RUNNING to other states to do business. (Just common sense)

Discrediting Palin

The Democrats (liberals all) are so predictable, you can use them as a “compass” to see just who frightens them the most by watching who it is they attack the most often, and the most viciously. They call Republicans “mean-spirited,” but there is NOTHING more “mean-spirited than what they say about Sarah Palin. Florida Congressman Alcee Hastings (A Democrat who was IMPEACHED when he was on the bench for corruption) said, “Anybody toting guns and stripping moose don’t care too much about what they do with Jews and blacks.” Aside from the lack of good grammar, that’s a typical unspecified attack. Florida Congressman John Lewis said Palin reminded him of racial segregationist George Wallace (who was a Democrat until he went independent). S. Carolina Democrat Party Chairman Carol Fowler thinks she’s not qualified because she’s never killed a baby (never had an abortion).

Then Barack Obama himself (B. O.) said, “You can put lipstick on a pig, but it’s still a pig.” The left claims to be “tolerant,” but they’re only tolerant of those who “toe their liberal (socialist) line.” Columnist Andrew Sullivan had the temerity to claim (with no proof whatever) that her youngest son was not her own child. A New York Times columnist compared her to a “fatal cancer.” But the only “fatal cancer” in this plot is the New York Times and its pushing (with the Democrat Party) of socialism. In Alaska, Democrats are filing all kinds of unsustainable “ethics complaints” on her, much like they did on former Republican Senate Leader Newt Gingrich (another Republican they hate and fear). All this does is show me they’re “scared to death” of Sarah. If she runs for president in 2010 in her own right (without McCain “gagging” her so she can say what she means), she’ll win in a landslide. Especially if Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal (another dependable conservative) is her running mate. (Just common sense)

Calif. Bible Study Permit

It’s required in California if you have too many people coming over to your house. Seems they made a law some time back requiring a permit for a “religious assembly” I don’t know how many people that requires. The article didn’t say. But the meeting is in a private home so it can’t be too many. The Constitution prohibits ANY law regarding religion or the practice thereof. They will argue that the Constitution doesn’t cover state law or local laws, but they’re lying. EVERY state that was admitted to the Union had to agree not to make laws contrary to the U. S. Constitution. ANY law concerning religion or the practice thereof is UNCONSTITUTIONAL. Take THAT, California! I’m not very religious, but I resent ANY effort to regulate religion or the practice thereof, nonetheless because it's unconstitutional. I hope the California Supreme Court helps this town come to their senses and throws out this law. (One News Now)

A Law Against Stupidity

In Colorado, they’ve passed a “law against stupidity.” Texting while driving is now against the law. It’s a shame that people are so STUPID that such a law is even CONSIDERED, let alone necessary. One woman who was caught texting while driving by a TV crew said, “Yes,” when asked if this law would stop her from texting while driving. Why? The possibility of dying or killing someone else didn’t stop her. Why this? Texting requires removing your attention from the road, essentially “driving without a driver.” This is the heights of stupidity. Anybody with ANY modicum of intelligence would not even CONSIDER texting while driving. This law is for STUPID people with NO intelligence. (Just common sense)

N. Korea "Cruisin' for a Bruisin' "

Idiot dictator Kim Jong Il is getting more and more obstreperous all the time. Maybe his stroke further “boiled his brain.” Maybe one of his generals should get rid of a few medals on his chest so he can take over and “rein in” this idiot. He’s going to get a lot of people killed, with his insistence on thinking he can take on the United states with a few nukes. Does he forget we have a LOT more nukes than he does? And his palace will be our first target? Even if he hides somewhere else, we will find him and make a steaming pile out of whatever building he is in, just as we did with Saddam. Does he really think he could WIN a war with the United States? Saddam did. There are way too many insane dictators out there. We need to “trim the list.” (Just common sense)

Pushing Obama's Lies

Stephan Pastis, cartoonist who draws “Pearls Before Swine,” must believe that’s what he’s doing when he does his strip. In a recent strip he says a “bank CEO” who decided to loan money to people who couldn’t repay it, got a big bonus, while destroying the bank and the economy, but who gets to keep his big mansion and all that money while taxpayers get to pay it back. This is bull droppings on a big scale. It was the LIBERALS in the government who FORCED lenders to do that, and so destroyed our economy, to allow themselves to “take over” the government in the 2008 election. All this strip does is support Obama’s lies that the economic slowdown is the fault of the free market—which is FAR from being true. (Pearls Before Swine)

LIBERALS Call Sotomayer A Bully

Chuckie Schumer can’t lie about it and accuse the “New Republic” of being a “conservative” news outlet (although he’ll try) because it is well-known that the “New Republic” is a TOP liberal-oriented publication and always has been, But THEY call Sotomayor a “bully” on the bench. They detail many of the things she has done to give them that opinion, and base it on information from one of her former law clerks; apparently not one of those who “love” her, as the Obama people talk about in their “cherry-picked” words. (New Republic)

GM Not "Buggy-Whip Maker"

People are saying things like, “many companies come into being, have a good run, then get replaced by a better product. Such was the case with carriage-makers and buggy-whip makers when the automobile came into being. Such is NOT the case with General Motors or Chrysler. There will be demand for American-made automobiles for years to come because they haven’t yet come up with anything better. It is NOT the case with oil companies, either. Both businesses are being destroyed by the Democrats in their efforts to “take over” the government in a “bloodless coup” (successful) by forcing lenders to loan money to people who could NOT pay it back (an "exercise in stupidity"). They blame it on “bad decisions” by private enterprise, but it’s not. It’s bad decisions by Democrats. It’s that simple; what’s hard to understand about that? (Just common sense)

Pot Calling Kettle Black

”B. O.” (Obama) is accusing the military of “wasting money.” What a laugh THAT is,” coming from a president who spent more in the first THREE WEEKS of his administration than this entire country has spent since its beginning! For him to accuse the MILITARY of “wasting money” is ludicrous. But then, everything about Obama is ludicrous. I’ll sure be glad when he’s gone and we can begin “cleaning up after him.” Getting rid of his “stimulus packages” and the “nationalization” of so many businesses, some of which did not ask for, and did not receive any “stimulus money,” if that's even possible. (One News Now)

Terrorism Growing in Prison

In New York, federal agents “brought down” a terrorist cell that had planned to kill Jews and blow many things up in the name of Islam. This investigation was started by the Bush administration, so don’t look for much praise, or even MENTION of it by Obama or his “panting dog” press. He plans to INCREASE terrorist recruiting in our prisons by bringing terrorist prisoners INTO the United states and giving them free access to existing prisoners, most of whom already blame the government for their misfortune, never mind they committed crimes that put them there. They’re easy recruits” for terrorists, as these New York terrorists have shown. (Michelle Malkin/One News Now)