Saturday, November 10, 2007

The Global Warming Swindle

One of the things I try to do here is to simplify the things the liberals want to complicate to fool people who would know better if they "paid attention to politics." One of those is the "climate control swindle" personified by former Vice-President AlGore, who took a "naturally-occurring phenomenon" and made it into a "money-making scam" for himself. The simple truth of it is that the current (and future) rise in global temperature of about one-fourth of a degree in the next 100 years is not a crisis. It is not something we should worry about and, to avoid it(if we could), that we should spend a lot of money (a lot of it going into Al's pocket and the pockets of his global-warming friends). Climate temperature is CYCLICAL. It goes up and down. It has since the beginning of this world and will continue until its end. The idea that man could accelerate it or DEcelerate it is absurd. Dr. Fred Singer is a noted climatologist. He actually DESIGNED many of the instruments today's climatologists USE to measure our climate. AlGore has NO "credentials" that allow him to be believed when he says this naturally-occurring phenomena" is "man-made" nor that man can put a stop to it or even "even things out" by buying the "carbon equalizers" his company sells to make the gullible think planting trees will accomplish it. Even if we COULD "do something about" climate warming, it's NOT a "crisis, his "the sky is falling" cries notwithstanding. Al is using the time-worn method of "name-calling" to "demonize" people who criticize him, calling them "global warming deniers," as if that meant that they did not know wherof they speak. If he hears about this item, he'll no doubt call ME a "global warming denier," and he'll be right, by MY definition, but not by his. Frankly, if you were confronted with such information by AlGore, a man with NO "credentials," and information to the contrary by such a man as Dr. Fred Singer, which would you be inclined to believe? For me, it would be Dr. Singer. Gore's camp even tried to debunk Singer's words by accusing him (without proof, of course) of "selling his science" in several areas, including his stand against "second-hand smoke" as a danger AND his stand against global warming as something to worry about. If you want to get more complicated, see the article linked below concerning Gore's contention that "global warming is settled science." It is, but not the way Gore would like it to be. (Cato Institute,)

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

Great take. But when you said that Al Gore is doing all this for the financial gain of his friends, how and who exactly is this helping? Who is profiting? I have seen a lot of evidence both ways that global warming is man made or naturally occuring. I don't know what the truth is. One thing I do know is that our dependence on non renewable resources is not a good thing. Everyone should pitch in and do something to start moving towards renewable resources. I talk about 1 very simple idea extensively on my blog at www.solarjoules.com.

Ray Thomas said...

Raz:

Perhaps you missed it that Al owns a big piece of at least one company that SELLS "carbon equalizers (whatever they call it)" from which he makers a LOT of money. Other sources for him are big speaking fees so he can sell the idea to others who will believe him, plus what he made from the movie that is being REQUIRED for children to watch in school, even though a court has ruled that there are many things wrong with it. There are many ways for him and others to profit from this scam. You say you've seen "evidence" both ways. What "evidence?" The "junk science" AlGore provides? I'd rather listen to Dr. Fred Singer, who knows whereof he speaks, AlGore's attempts to discredit him notwithstanding. I don't pretend man is even CAPABLE of making much of a difference in the global temperature if he can't even divert a hurricane. We do NOT depend on "non-renewable resources." Fossil oil IS renewable if the environmentalists would allow it. Solar energy is but one of the ways we can reduce our dependence on foreign sources of energy. Furthermore, a half a degree increase in global temperature in 100 years (which is cyclical and has happened before), doesn't bother me overmuch.

Thank you for your comments.

RAY THOMA$