Worried About Farts

As if the fuss about the CEO of GOYA Foods having the temerity to actually praise our sitting president weren’t enough, now liberals, far and wide, are “very worried” about how the increased farting by buyers of GOYA beans will affect global warming/climate change. The fact that “climate change” is an imaginary problem doesn’t enter into it. Liberals have targeted GOYA because its CEO didn’t “toe the liberal line,” so they’re going to find everything they can to use in hitting him over the head every chance they can get. For my part, I’m going to seek out GOYA products, and fart as much as possible, and liberals be damned. Of course, this fits right in with the liberal wish to tax as much as they can, and it was only a matter of time after they started taxing cow farts that that would move on to human farts. Every living being farts. Cows fart; horses fart; dogs fart. INSECTS fart. We just can’t hear them. And I predict that liberal fools will try taxing farts from as many of them as they can. I notice this comes from the Babylon Bee, a well known spoof publication, so I’m not really sure of its veracity. But since liberals are so prone to be stupid, it’s easy to fall for it. (Babylon Bee)

"Doesn't Work With Gangs"

A New Zealand police commander tells us the obvious: “Gun control only works with the compliant.” The law-abiding. It doesn’t work with gangs, or other law-breakers. No kidding! Maybe we should import her and send her to the Virginia Legislature. They need somebody with a few brains. There obviously aren’t any there, considering the recent anti-gun laws they’ve passed. Of course, their governor isn’t much better. He promised a “violent confrontation” with the pro-gun folks at that recent pro-gun meeting. He, and his “compliant” media were sorely disappointed when nobody got shot and killed (while he hid in his office), in spite of all the guns that were there. Of course, he was quick to take credit for stopping a confrontation that wasn’t going to happen, anyway. He’s a consummate politician. A “good con man.” This NZ cop realizes what I, and many other people have been telling people for years: anti-gun laws only work on the law-abiding, who OBEY laws, even if they think they’re stupid. So what the hell GOOD are they? NO good, that’s what. They only make it easier for law-breakers, who obey NO laws, to victimize those who do. So they make more of them. (Twitter)

Joe Biden Is Wrong!

Everything he proposes to do if he gets elected president is wrong. He wants to open the borders and allow MS-13 gang members to come into this country with nothing to stop this murderous gang, which is staging a “slow-motion invasion” of this country to enter so they can kill many more of us—and victimize many others. He plans to raise your taxes unmercifully. He’s very up front about that. He thinks he can take your money and spend it wildly (like Dumbocrats do) will improve the economy. His apologists claim that he intends to raise taxes only on the top 1%, which is a lie. And even if true, it mitigates against any improvement in the economy. He wants to put Christians—which many of you are—on the terrorist watch list, which demonstrates his abysmal stupidity for all to see. He has many other plans for us, too. Plans that will, if implemented, BREAK this economy and the country, dropping us into socialism and maybe even communism eventually.

Communist China wants to take us over, and Joe doesn’t see them as a threat. Then there is the question of his very advanced age, and his demonstrated senility. Half the time he doesn’t even know where he is. He wants to abolish almost everything the liberal left tells him to. He has jumped on the “Abolish the cops” bandwagon. He believes in that “Green Myth” of climate change, first known as global warming, and his planned method for dealing with that imaginary problem will also break us. There are so many things about Biden that are WRONG, I can’t even think of them all. He is an “impending danger” to this country and, if elected, will finish Obama’s job of destroying it. We need to send him to the trash heap of history so children can admire his hairy legs and he can sniff little (and big) girls’ hair, full time—if he lasts another year. Where he can make gaffes all day long and nobody will notice while he supports his son’s illegal activities—and maybe even a few of his own. (Just common sense)

It's Beginning

I’ve been predicting the start of a civil war for a long time, and ANTIFA is bringing my prediction to life. I’ve also said that the time will come when someone in an ANTIFA crowd will bring an illegal gun to their demonstration and will shoot and kill somebody who opposes them. Fortunately this time, lousy marksmanship stopped a killing, but otherwise, it was just what I predicted. An SUV that was not involved in the “demonstration” (riot) was instantly surrounded by screaming rioters and the driver, afraid rightly for his life, accelerated through the crowd of swarming rioters. Not one, but TWO demonstrators pulled guns, but only one fired, hitting the driver. Then he put his gun away and continued “demonstrating” until he was arrested and charged with attempted murder later. This write-up goes to great lengths to disguise the nature of the “demonstrators,” but they were ANTIFA. Today’s “latter day KKK.” If ANTIFA is not designated as a “Domestic Terrorist Group,” allowing the arrest of its members just for being a member, this is not only going to continue, but will inevitably escalate into open warfare in the streets. (Deseret)

"Only the Cops"

A regular refrain among the anti-gun fools is that “Only the cops should have guns.” That’s so the cops could “lord it over us with impunity.” But. That. Will. Never. Happen. Even if they manage to eliminate all LEGAL guns, there are still millions of ILLEGAL guns already out there, in the hands of the people they do need to worry about, the law-breakers. The only guns they will be able to eliminate are those in the hands of the law-abiding, who are NOT the ones they need to worry about. That’s the basic flaw in the reasoning of the anti-gun fools. That by removing guns from the law-abiding, they can “stop gun crime.” That’s a fool’s scheme. The law-abiding do not use their guns for “gun crime.” They use them to defend themselves FROM gun crime. Take away their guns and gun crime has no impediment, and holders of illegal guns will “run roughshod over them.” Each and every anti-gun law only serves to make it easier for the law-breakers to victimize the law-abiding, by making the law-abiding defenseless against the illegally-armed law-breakers (Just common sense)

Self Defense Now Illegal

Apparently it is if you live in St. Louis and are attacked by an angry ANTIFA mob. An innocent couple watched as an angry mob approached their property with “blood in their eyes.” So they got their guns and went out to defend themselves. One of their guns was a dreaded AR-15 and the mob, which had already destroyed an expensive gate, turned and ran for the hills at the sight of the guns, cowards that they are. Nobody was hurt, which I’m sure would not have been the case if the mob had not have been stopped in their tracks by the display of a legally-owned gun. Without that, I’m sure that home would have been destroyed and the owner killed—at least the homeowner thought so. Now a crooked politician who got himself elected DA plans to charge them with something. I don’t know what kind of a crime he can “tailor” to fit this situation, but this crooked lawyer, who is himself under investigation for corruption, can figure something out to use. And will, if not stopped by “wiser heads.” We need to have something that can be done in situations like this, where a lawful citizen is attacked, and uses a gun to defend himself against an illegal mob. Oh, wait! We DO have something we can do about it. It’s called the Second Amendment! Unless this crooked lawyer can find a way around it, and other crooked politicians team up to let him get away with it. (Fix This Nation)

NYC Spiraling to Disaster

We need to get rid of that doofus who sits in the mayor’s chair in New York City before he creates a complete crime disaster in that city. He is seeing to it that hundreds, maybe even thousands of prisoners, some violent offenders, get released, using the excuse that he is worried about them catching the virus, while at the same time cutting the police budget by $100 BILLION dollars, which effectively cripples them in their effort to keep those living there safe. That is a “recipe for disaster,” and anybody with a modicum of knowledge can see it. But DiBlasio cannot. At the same time he is making it almost impossible for the law-abiding to obtain guns for self defense while law-breakers have no problem getting guns—which is a second recipe for disaster. These actions have already caused the DEATHS of many people, yet he keeps those policies in force. In just 7 days recently in NYC, 97 people have been shot, 11 fatally. Which is a testament to the lack of shooting ability of most of the shooters. But it’s only going to get worse as DiBlasio does more and more stupid things while ignoring the deadly result. He needs to be forcibly removed from office as he isn’t going to resign under any kind of pressure. He has shown that. (Radio 1010 Wins)

Bloomberg Controls Mean Bloodbath

Former NY Mayor Bloomberg wants to take away all LEGAL guns. If his “gun control” had been in effect in Fort Worth when that fool came into that church and started killing innocent people, that brave citizen with his own gun would not have been able to instantly kill him, and there would have been a real massacre in that church. It amazes and sickens me that the “authorities” in Fort Worth immediately “jumped up:” and tried to stop such civilians from being able to bring his gun with him to church. What kind of stupidity does it take to want to eliminate the SOLUTION to gun violence? I keep telling the anti-gun fools that their laws only make it easier for the law-breakers to victimize the law-abiding, but they’re “tone deaf” to reality, I guess. Or they would listen to this “voice of reason.” But they’re too stupid—or they have an ulterior motive in wishing to rid the world of as many guns as they can—except those in the hands of the cops or “government agents.” (Breitbart)

A Criminal Utopia

The United States: as a “cop-free zone.” A world completely open for criminals to victimize anybody they wished without having to worry about some cop having the temerity to actually arrest them for their crime. A world in which they could rob, rape, con and murder without punishment, where all the law-abiding people would be at their mercy. The criminals would love that. The honest people would not. What I should not have to point out is the unalterable fact that, without the police, the criminals would “run free,” taking what they wished, assaulting and killing those who objected. That is what they would like, and they can see progress in that direction with the recent successes of that lawless outfit, the lack Lives Matter movement. What neither side seems to see is that the breakdown in lawful order that would entail would destroy this society and lead to armed warfare between the bad guys and the good guys, with many non-participants being wounded and killed—with nobody to control what happens. (Just common sense)

The Right Idea

As stupid liberal politicians are working assiduously to make them defenseless in the face of the crime wave expected as they release violent criminals “because of Covid 19,’ while limiting the ability of the law abiding to get their own guns for self defense, Americans are buying guns in record numbers, both legally and illegally, from some of the very criminals against whom they will need them. They know that approaching is going to be a need to defend themselves because the cops can’t. They couldn’t even at full strength because they couldn’t be everywhere, but with the movement to defund the cops gaining strength all over the country, the cops will be even less able to defend them. Americans are known for their ability to defend themselves against marauding criminals in the past—although that has been somewhat weakened as police presence took over the job. But with the weakening of that assistance, the need to have their tools for their own defense means having their own guns. And they have responded to that need by emptying many gun stores. The criminals, who figured they’d have a “gay old time” victimizing the law abiding are going to be very surprised when they die at the hands of their intended victims. Americans have always been a “hardy breed,” and, with the exception of the few who would not “rise up” in self defense, are quite capable of defending themselves in the absence of the cops. (Just common sense)

Gun Control Is Ludicrous

I just don’t understand the anti-gun fools. They have to know that NONE of their highly-touted anti-gun laws have EVER stopped a single illegal shooting. What’s more, they have INCREASED illegal shootings by making the law-abiding defenseless against people using ILLEGAL guns. Yet they ignore absolute evidence of this, and insist on making even more of their useless, unenforceable anti-gun laws, while people die daily because of their laws. Background checks do not stop “gun crime.” They only let the cops find the killers, IF they got their guns legally, which law-breakers never do. “Gun-free zones” are about the stupidest idea on the planet. Law-breakers freely admit that tey SEEK OUT “gun-free zones” in which to do their dirty work because they can be pretty sure the law-abiding will not be armed there, and they can rob and kill people freely. Other laws like “Safe storage” laws only serve to slow down the response of the law-abiding to an attack by a law-breaker, and often just gets them killed while they’re trying to get their gun into action to oppose that law-breaker. Where anti-gun laws are the tightest, gun sales are also highest. Every time you hear about a mass shooting it is usually IN a “fun-free zone.” So what GOOD is it? I could go on and on, but I won’t. I don’t want to bore anybody. (Just common sense)

Defunding the Cops is Stupid!

Just because there are a few--very few—bad cops who think they can get away with abusing their power is no reason to hamstring them by defunding them, or to get rid of them, altogether. The whole idea of getting rid of the police is stupid if you think it through, which those screaming to do it just have not done. Think about it, What would inevitably happen if you abolished the cops? The crooks and other malcontents like the Islamic terrorists would take over. Murder rates would go sky high, and YOU might even be one of the victims. Even if not, you’ll probably be the victim of the crimes that will inevitably be committed by the criminals and malcontents who will be given unfettered power to victimize you without reprisals. The cops are the first and last defense you have against them, and to defund or get rid of them is folly. It’s already happening in NYC, where their stupid liberal mayor has taken away a billion dollars in money, strangling their efforts at recruiting, training, and controlling the cops they do have. Cops are so disillusioned at that that they are quitting in droves before the money runs out, or they get killed, riding around in their distinctive cars, wearing their distinctive uniforms. The murder rate had already DOUBLED, and the rate of other crimes has gone up, as well, in the absence of many cops that money would have paid for. And it’s only going to get worse, as stupid liberal politicians like DiBlasio continue to make, and impose, stupid decisions. (Just common sense)

Abuse of Power

Nancy Peelosi says, “Congress has the constitutional power of oversight on all offices, and we’re only exercising it to investigate President Trump. We are only exercising constitutional oversight.” No it is NOT. We aren’t even allowed to harass a possible murderer if we don’t have clear and convincing evidence he committed the crime. They have NO such evidence on the part of the president, which makes their so-called “investigations” harassment and an abuse of power. They have been “investigating” this president from the moment he beat them in the 2016 election, and have, after THREE YEARS of trying, found NOTHING they can use to “get” him. But they’re still “fishing.” Now what they’re doing rises to the level of election interference. They’re in the Supreme court trying to get access to his tax returns, just a few weeks before the election that is going to re-elect him and further frustrate their “fishing expeditions.” Yes, they do have the power of oversight. But they have abused that power in many ways, and will, unless we stop them, continue to spend millions of your dollars, to continue “investigating” Trump until they die. But not when Trump dies. They will continue to “investigate” him long after he is dead. (Just common sense)

Didn't Plan On That

Virginia Governor Northam did his best (worst) to make it look like there was going to be an “armed riot” in Richmond some time ago, and was sorely disappointed when nobody got shot, even though many guns were in evidence there. Event-goers even cleaned up after themselves. And there was only ONE ARREST, of a woman, for wearing a mask. Of course, now everybody wears a mask. Northam finally came out of his hidey-hole and had to admit the even was completely peaceful, after he “went off half-cocked” and declared a “state of emergency” on not a single bit of evidence. The final result? Gun sales increased almost 50% over 2018! So all he accomplished with his irrational histrionics was almost half again the number of LEGAL gun sales that year. And no telling how many ILLEGAL gun sales there were. Of course, the legal gun sales are all he is concerned with, because that’s all he can control—maybe. He can’t control how many illegal gun sales there are, and never will. This time, instead of being “black-faced,” he was “red-faced” when it was all over. And the citizens of the state of Virginia will deal with him in the next election. (CNS News)

Taxing Cow Farts

Some time ago, a government bureaucrat came up with an ingenious idea: tax cow farts. Cows fart all the time, so that would be major supply of money for the government. Not a moral supply, but a supply, nonetheless. But don’t tell them this: every living being farts, or they’ll lay a tax on it for everybody they can get to. Cows fart; horses fart; humans fart; So do animals. Bugs fart, though we can’t hear them. Birds and bees fart. But they can’t tax their farts, so they ignore them. Taxing farts is like taxing the very air we breathe. We can’t avoid farting, nor breathing. So taxing farts should be declared criminal. But then, politicians don’t think that way. They want to tax everything they think they can get away with. Their entire way of living is figuring out new and better ways to gouge more and more money out of us. Some if by taxes. Some is by “donations.” I’m retired. I have no taxable income. So they can’t tax me. But I get 100 e-mails every day, and98% of them are demands for “donations” from various bureaucrats, some of whom I’ve never heard of, in states I’ve never visited. The closer to an election we get, the more strident they become, some even accusing me of “letting them down” because I haven’t sent them my money. It never ends. When one election ends a cycle, another election is “coming up.” I’m really getting tired of dealing with it. (Just common sense)

Why Is Socialism Bad?

Because it is a system that depends on THEFT of goods and services EARNED by those capable and willing to earn their own way for the benefit of those who would rather live at the expense of others, rather than earn their own way. It is one form of collectivism, which STEALS the goods and services EARNED by the producer of new wealth and gives it, UNEARNED, to those who do NOT. There will always be those who don’t wish to create their own wealth, and would rather steal that earned by others—and that is the “market” to which the collectivist salespeople aim their sales pitch. And it’s a receptive audience. Socialism is just one form of collectivism, which depends on the producer of new wealth so they can steal part of it for the benefit of those who are too lazy to do for themselves. Socialism, and all forms of collectivism will ultimately fail, when they run out of other people’s money. But it will always be successful for a time, and those lazy people will benefit from it while the socialism salespeople gain power from it. Then when it fails, the socialism sellers will make their excuses and move on to the next bunch of suckers. They claim that “real socialism” had not been practiced, and are eager to try it again. That’s an excuse they can use over and over, since the next bunch of suckers didn’t hear them when they told it to the previous bunch. (Just common sense)

CNN Lies About Guns

In reporting about that bar shooting in Kansas city, CNN lied to blame “lax gun laws” on the reason the killer even had a gun. They forgot to mention the fact that his having that gun was illegal. He was a felon, which bars him from owning a gun legally. So his having a gun was illegal in the first place. Which proves the LIE about “lax gin laws.” A person who wants to do ill with a gun WILL get a gun ILLEGALLY if he can’t get it legally. And that’s what he did. Which again proves my contention that ALL anti-gun laws are useless and unenforceable. The anti-gun fools aren’t listening, though. Their minds are made up, so don’t confuse them with facts. CNN recently had to pay a big judgment to one man thei lied about, so they are well known for LYING in their “reporting.” Not just about guns, but about everything. So we know we can’t depend on CNN to tell the truth, so why watch them, at all? They lie, and falsify stories to support their false narrative. They’re well-known Trump haters, and lie about him daily. Their viewership is shrinking rapidly, and I don’t expect them to last much longer. (Washington Free Beacon)

Imbeciles Running NYC

The chief imbecile being the mayor. The second imbecile is the DA. The mayor wants to take away $100 million dollars from the cops, which will completely incapacitate them when it comes to controlling crime, and get many cops killed. The DA wants FREE release of criminals, including violent ones WITHOUT bail, until trial. How this is supposed to reduce crime in that city is beyond my imagination. But then, I’m an intelligent individual. I think the criminals are running things in NYC. DiBlasio if a top criminal and the DA is next to him in his influence. That’s the only way I can explain their absolutely STUPID “Solutions” to their “crime problem.” Defunding the cops is only going to empower the criminals, and I’ve become convinced that’s what the mayor and the DA want. They will only be happy when the criminals are completely overrunning their city, and to hell with the HONEST citizens. That’s the only explanation for their stupidities. What happens next is uncontrolled riots and murder. The feds need to move in and remove DiBlasio AND that traitorous DA to keep them from getting even more people killed. And that needs to happen in many other cities with similar fools running things, too. Before it blows up in their faces. (Just common sense)

Kills Knockout Game Attacker at 93

In some places they doubt the veracity of this story. I don’t know why. It’s simple and straightforward: a St. Louis woman, 93 years old, was knocked down by a cowardly kid who didn’t know any better. As she lie on the ground, several of them laughed and talked about what they had done while kicking her. Fearing for her life, she pulled out her gun and shot one in the head. Instant Karma. The others may have reached Indianapolis by now. The fools who practice this cowardly game take note: you play the game, you may die. Only cowards sucker punch people from behind, especially old people, then run away. Sometimes the puchee dies; other times the puncher. I personally think this story is true. If it isn’t, it ought to be. The typical victim in this game is usually an old person who probably couldn’t fight back, anyway. And to hit them from behind? That’s pure cowardice. (National Report)

How Stupid He Is!

Teenage “gun control activist” David Hogg has come out with his newest lie. He is now saying, “Minorities and non-binary people founded the gun control movement centuries ago.” Maybe he is too stupid to even know that there WERE no guns “centuries ago” so how could they “found the gun control movement?” David Hogg is too young to know ANYTHING, least of all the things he spouts about guns. He thinks, just because he jumped on his bicycle and rode to that school during a mass shooting, he’s some kind of an expert on gun control. His “handlers” work hard to convince him he is. You know. The people who PAY for all his trips to speak about gun control, using their scripts. It’s when he ad-libs that he make such major errors like this. Usually his handlers and script writers are a LITTLE more intelligent. Hogg is being USED by the gun control fools to promote their narrative. Soon his usefulness will be over and they’ll “drop him like a hot potato.” The entire concept of gun control is based on the stupid notion that first, you CAN “get rid of all guns” and that, if you do, you can stop violent crime. Remember medieval times when there were no guns? Then the law-breakers used knives and swords. If all guns were gone (an impossibility) criminals would simply use something else to victimize the law-abiding. (Washington Examiner)

"Blue Lives Matter Too"

The Black Lives Matter crowd doesn’t want to hear this, but the fact is, black men kill cops at a much higher rate than do cops kill blacks. And many of those cop killings are from ambush. Cops being killed by black men as they sit in their very distinctive cruisers wearing their very distinctive uniforms are rife. But there are no parades, no “demonstrations,” no riots when a black man kills a white cop. Only when a cop kills a black man. Is it any wonder that cops are a little quicker to shoot black men these days? Those ubiquitous (to BLM) cop shootings of unarmed black men (most of which are errors made by cops who are very frightened of being ambushed and killed by black men and are an overreaction) are to be expected with all the pressure being applied to cops who are scared for their lives while just doing their jobs. What happened to George Floyd is an exception I suspect was a “grudge killing” by an out-of-control cop who was not punished after many instances of abuse of power and who thought he could get away with it. The Washington Post disputes former Mayor Juliani’s figures on this, citing their own “study,” which is questionable, at best, but the fact remains that black men are killing cops without notice in the media, while the media plays up every single cop killing of a black man.(Market Watch)

Why's Socialism Popular?

Everybody with any intelligence at all, and any experience at life is asking, “Why has socialism become so popular?” It’s instructive to note that it’s only popular among youngsters not old enough to remember the bad things about socialism that was revealed graphically by the COLLAPSE of the Soviet Union and the riots and unrest in Venezuela. Truth is, socialism, in its many forms, under its many names, has failed everywhere it has been tried, it is set to fail. Its promoters say the reason for those failures is that it was “not done properly.” Which is a load of bullsh-t. There IS no “proper” way to do socialism. Socialism relies on STEALING the fruits of real production for the benefit of those who produce nothing at all. Socialism produces nothing, and only derived that which it gives away, from those who do produce new wealth. Today’s youngsters, who think they know so much, have not been alive long enough to recognize the real societal threat represented by socialism. There are many good examples of the failure of socialism, but they ignore them in their zeal. Socialist promoters rely on this ignorance, and “feed on it.” (Just common sense)

Self Defense Without A Gun

Certain politicians tell you that you don’t need a gun because the cops can protect you. They cannot. And the cops will be the first to tell you that. The key here is time; the time it takes them from when they’re called, until they can make it to “the scene.” In that time, many people can be hurt while they wait. If somebody is there with their own gun, and able to oppose the attacker on an even keel, fewer people can be hurt during that time. But many times—most, actually-- when that armed fool comes in, you don’t have someone there with a gun to oppose him. That’s when you need to understand that a defensive weapon doesn’t need to be a gun. There are many defensive weapons around you, all the time, wherever you are. Anything with a little weight can be an effective club, and if you get the opportunity, you can use it that way. Not as effective as a gun, but the desperation of being faced with that gun may make their use necessary, if you are alert to the opportunity. I have 2 33 fluid ounce water bottles at my elbow that can be used to brain an inattentive gunman if need be. Beside my bed is a 2-cell metal flashlight that can be used in a similar manner. I have another one on the front seat of my car to use on anybody who reaches through the window of my car to assault me in a “road rage” incident. If you have a heavy ash tray nearby, that can also be used. The point is, be alert to these potential defensive weapons. If you’re being threatened by a gunman, don’t try it unless he gives you the opportunity by being careless, but most personal attacks do not involve guns, and these “hidden weapons” can be used. (Just common sense)

Eliminating Cops Not An Aswer

Removing bad cops is the answer, which insipid liberal politicians are afraid to do. And therein lies the problem. You look at the locations for all the trouble, and it lies in liberal-run cities like Chicago and Minneapolis. Their liberal politicians don’t have the intestinal fortitude to impose rules that allow them to remove bad cops when they show themselves by abusing their power, and BEFORE they kill some innocent person. Removing the police is FOLLY. It is an “engraved invitation” to the criminals and other malcontents to “take over,” as they did in Minneapolis with their CHOP area takeover. It will mean a DEATH SENTENCE to many innocent people as the malcontents “run free” in the absence of any real opposition. Some of them say they’re goong to send SOCIAL WORKERS on police calls! What will that accomplish? Getting many social workers KILLED, along with the people who called them. And it’s the same insipid politicians who couldn’t figure out how to CONTROL their cops who now are, in some places, agreeing to disband them, leaving their citizens at the mercy of the malcontents. If Chicago is now the worst city for gun killings, wait until Minneapolis gets rid of their cops. (Just common sense)

"It's Racism Somehow"

According to the left, everything anybody (except them, of course) says will be judged as racism. That’s because they’ve been so successful in eliminating criticism by using the unsupported accusation of racism on ANYBODY who opposes their fool policies. They’ve accused President Trump of racism many times, without coming up with anything to PROVE racism on his part. Me too. I can’t count the number of ties I’ve been accused of racism because I say the truth, no matter what color the person being criticized are, or what race they are, what nationality, or what sex. If they’re bad, I say it. I judge each person as an INDIVIDUAL. If he/she is bad, I say so. If not, I say that, too. The reason why it works for them is that it is hard to prove a negative. If the accused even tries, they say, “If you have to say it, you’re guilty.” They tried accusations of sexual impropriety, but that only goes so far, and mostly only works on men for the most part. There can’t be that many men who can’t keep their zippers up. But they want us to believe than sexual impropriety is rampant, and no proof is required. If a woman makes an accusation, they won’t even let the man know WHO is accusing them--“to protect her sensitivity, don’tcha know.” They just ruin his life and leave him by the wayside. They just don’t care. (American Thinker)

Gun Sales Up, Crime Down

Anti-gun fools hate it. They NEED crime to stay up as gun sales increase. They NEED more and better mass shootings. That’s what they use to promote their efforts to eliminate self defense for the law-abiding. I’ve come to believe that the anti-gun fools WANT high numbers of gun deaths. Being anti-gun is their “bread and butter.” It’s how they make their lucrative livings. The boss at MOMS Against Guns (or something like that) claims she doesn’t get a salary for her efforts. Do you believe that? How does she then pay the bills? Maybe she doesn’t get a salary “on the books,” but she has to be getting steady money from somewhere. But the figures show that what it takes to reduce crime is for more law-abiding people to be able ton have their own guns with which to defend themselves. But they won’t hear of it. They want to keep up their useless efforts to ban guns, period. They “know better than we do.” Never mind their methods don’t work, and ours do. You don’t make yourself defenseless in order to defend yourself. We know that. They don’t. (PanAm Post)

Fighting for Ignorance

It is sheer ignorance to have a policy that precludes self defense, in any manner. This government knows it, and that’s why they maintain sufficient defenses to meet any attack. Meanwhile, that same government wants to STOP American citizens from being able to similarly defend themselves against an attack, by passing numerous anti-gun laws that not only do not do what they are said to do, but make it EASIER for law-breakers to victimize the law-abiding. Why do they do that? They have to know that their laws are not only useless to prevent gun violence, but only PROMOTE it by disarming the law-abiding so they are defenseless against the law-breakers. So what ulterior motive do they have? One of their favorite things is to assure us that “good guys with guns” never stop a single instance of “gun violence.” Again, they have to be aware that it happens all the time. On such a regular basis they have to either be stupid or have an ulterior motive for denying it. In just December last year it happened 11 times. And that’s only the times we know about. How many instances were stopped by somebody simply showing they had a gun we’ll never know because they are usually not reported. Maybe they know that “government agents” will one day come after what is ours and they want them to meet as few guns as possible in the hands of their intended victims. If a politician tells you that you don’t need a gun—you need a gun.(Self Reliance Central)

No Doubt About It

The Mississippi governor knows what Louisiana politicians don’t know, apparently, that those homeowners who brought out their guns to oppose violent “demonstrators” who had already threatened their lives and property. It used to be that self defense of your life, your family, and your property was a given. Enshrined in the Constitution. But that was before liberal Dumbocrat politicians managed to get themselves in power. These fools don’t care about constitutional protections. To them, the Constitution is only an impediment to their wishes, and they ignore it as much as they can, making and using laws for their own purposes and enforcing them until the courts rule against them, which may take years. In Louisiana, the local prosecutor, a liberal Dumbocrat, doesn’t think self defense is a given. She said, “I am alarmed at the events that occurred over the weekend, where peaceful protestors (sic) were met by guns.”

She apparently doesn’t know the law, and she really should, considering her job. Or she just doesn’t care about the law if it goes against her personal feelings. And those “protestors” were NOT “peaceful! They had already threatened to kill them, burn their house down, even kill their dog. They broke a gate to enter and were advancing on the house when the McCloskys confronted them, standing in front of their home with their guns. They would have been within their constitutional rights to shoot them. The prosecutor apparently thinks allowing “demonstrators” to invade private property and threaten to kill the owners trumps the owners’ right to self defense. It does NOT. Somebody needs to instruct this “prosecutor” in the law. I expect a judge will do that if this ever comes to court—unless that judge is similarly biased. (Breitbart)

Evidence Against Zero Tolerance

Zero Tolerance doesn’t work; Gun-Free Zones do not work. Both are merely “engraved invitations” to would-be mass murderers to “Come in and shoot us; no guns here.” This has become not only obvious (to intelligent people), but real proof of it has been ignored by incompetent “authorities” whose only interest seems to be in improving their power and position while people keep shooting up schools and killing children (in spite of their many useless laws). The University of Florida did a study on “Zero Tolerance” and found that, although the policy resulted in increased penalties, it FAILED to reduce the instances of gun violence in schools. “Trust between the school officials, parents and students is the only way to make schools safer. School officials have not earned that trust and zero tolerance polices have contributed to that lack of trust. The school principal must have a relationship with their students and parents. They must trust each other.”

That can never happen as long as school officials can be counted on to overreact. Allowing staff who already have concealed carry permits to carry their guns to school, not uniformed officers on school grounds, is the only answer to gun violence on school grounds. Uniformed cops can be “targeted” by would-be shooters, and be the first to die. Only if the shooter doesn’t know if somebody there is armed, and who it is can their wishes to shoot up the school be denied. They trust these people to teach these kids, but not to defend them. This needs to change, but with so many incompetent people running things, will it ever be? Meanwhile, people (including children) will continue to die while incompetent politicians make laws that do not work, and school officials overreact because of "zero tolerance" and "gun-free zone" policies. (Just common sense)

Hysterical Overreaction

That’s the only description I can think of when I think about “authorities” so afraid of anything gun” that they would charge a student with terrorism and hold him in jail without bail for WEEKS for posting a PICTURE of a gun on the Internet. A PICTURE of a gun! And they put him in jail without bail for WEEKS! And it’s not even a real gun! Just a picture! How stupid is that? Yet this is the quality of people in “authority.” They’re so frustrated that they can’t get some of their useless, unenforceable anti-gun laws approved that they overreact to a completely innocent thing like posting a picture of a gun, as if that were really terrorism. By so doing, they cheapen the very word used to describe a real danger. Meanwhile, other “authorities” give special treatment to the very Islamic terrorists that give real meaning to the name. One recent case was when one school required CHILDREN to write, “Allah is the only God.” Or allow teachers to teach about Islam in schools, while not allowing them to teach about Christianity. Meanwhile they do things like locking up a student for WEEKS because he posted a picture of a gun. How can we ever have any confidence in the intelligence of such “authorities?” Damn, the anti-gun fools are stupid! (Big League Politics)