Bored Politicians

Sometimes I wonder at the things some politicians put forward. It seems like they’re bored, don’t have enough to do, and want “a project,” no matter how stupid it is. One such is the bill now in Congress to ban certain hair styles. What the HELL do they think gives them the right to DICTATE people’s hair styles? Another is gun control. Gun control is a useless endeavor. If you ban a gun, law-breakers will get their guns ILLEGALLY. They ARE law-breakers, after all. Why do we call them that? Because they break laws! So no amount of anti-gun laws are going to stop them from getting their guns and victimizing the law-abiding, who DO obey laws, even when they’re STUPID laws. That makes them DEFENSELESS against those millions of illegal guns in the hands of those law-breakers. That just makes it easier for the law-breakers to victimize the law-abiding, just the opposite of what they CLAIM their laws are supposed to do. So why do they insist on making even more of them every time some fool takes an ILLEGAL gun and shoots somebody? Because they don’t have enough to do, and are bored. I get really tired of writing the same words over and over, but I will continue to do so until anti-gun fools “wise up,” which will probably be never. They just don’t have the intelligence. (Black Doctor)

Shouting Me Down

I once attended an anti-gun rally just to see for myself the lies they told about gun control. After they were done telling their lies, they opened things to questions. When it was my turn, the organizers handed me the microphone and I started to ask this question: “Why do you keep passing laws that not only don’t work, but actually make it easier for holders of illegal guns to victimize the law-abiding, who obey your laws, even if they think they’re stupid?” I only got half through that question when the crowd started shouting me down because it was a question to which they had no answer, and they didn’t want me to be able to finish asking it. From that moment on, I felt threatened in that crowd, and couldn’t get to the outside door fast enough. This is evidence that they don’t care a whit that their laws don’t work, but they want to keep making them because that gives them the POWER to tell law-abiding people what they can, and cannot do. Nothing more, nothing less. They don’t care that their laws DISARM the law-abiding, making them DEFENSELESS against the millions of ILLEGAL guns already out there. The only REAL way to at least slow down “gun violence” is to give the law-abiding a “level playing field” by allowing them to have and use their own guns, a right guaranteed by the Second Amendment of the Constitution. (Just common sense)

Deaths Prevented?

“MOMS against Guns (or something like that) is “celebrating success” in 2018 because they got a lot of their anti-gun laws passed. But I have one question for them: “Can you show me ONE DEATH that was prevented by ANY of your anti-gun laws?” It’s a question they can’t answer, not because you can’t prove a negative, but because not a single one of their laws prevented a single gun death. They INCREASED them, in fact, by DISARMING the law-abiding, leaving the way clear for the law breakers, who obey NO LAWS. That is the fatal flaw in their thinking: that making a law will keep a criminal or other “bad guy” from buying a gun illegally, or just stealing one. All they do is leave the law-abiding DEFENSELESS against the millions of ILLEGAL guns out there. They have to know this, but they ignore it, while the law-abiding, who DO obey their laws, DIE at the hands of those who do NOT obey their laws. From this, I can only conclude that they are not interested in reducing “gun crime,” but are only interested in the POWER to tell us what we can, and cannot do. They want to reduce the number of guns out there in other than government hands, so that, when “government agents” come for their property, they will be met with fewer guns in the hands of their intended victims. They’ve already started, with their RICO laws, under which they can take your property if somebody THINKS you got it illegally and are not required to PROVE you guilty in order to TAKE your property. (Just common sense)

The Fix...Is In

Unless you’re an “official source,” don’t try and investigate Planned Parenthood. They’ve got the fix in, and they’ll put YOU in jail or sue you for millions of dollars before you can charge them with anything. They murder hundreds of babies in the womb (and sometimes out of it) daily, all over the country. That’s MURDER. But they have “connections” nobody seems to understand, somewhere, that “protect” them from investigation, and it you try, unless you’re “official,” they’ll come after you, as they did to David Daleiden, a “citizen journalist,” who was investigating Planned Parenthood. He actually “got the goods on them,” but they blunted his efforts by making spurious charges against him. They somehow convinced somebody in the San Francisco hierarchy that he committed one or more crimes during his investigation, and charging him with them effectively stopped HIS investigation—for now. He actually got video evidence that they were selling dead baby parts, but that doesn’t seem to make any difference. PP got a million dollar judgment against him, which will ruin his life, forever. I guess mass murder and infanticide doesn’t count, any more. (The Hill)

Inventing Statistics

Muslim Rep. Ilhan Omar just invented yet another “statistic” for the anti-gun fools to take up and spread, although they know it is false. She says that “500 people die EVERY DAY from gun violence.” Where the hell she gets such numbers is beyond imagination, except to see that is is IN her imagination. She’s fulfilling her “obligation” to make as much trouble as she can as an elected representative. That obligation being her obligation to be loyal to ISLAM, not the United States, even though she swore to be faithful to, and protect the Constitution of the United States as a member of Congress. Omar is following the lead of AOC in making up statistics to “prove” a false narrative. AOC does it every day, and she’s very good at inventing false statistics. But AOC is just stupid, and dedicated to nothing but her own advancement, at all costs. Omar is dedicated to advancing the interests of ISLAM at all costs. Anti-gun fools promote such false statistics in their quest to disarm all Americans and make them defenseless against the millions of ILLEGAL guns, already out there. Many in the hands of Islamic terrorists. (Flag and Cross)

Democrats Are Stupid!

That’s the only thing I can think of to explain most of their plans for the next Congress. All their plans are stupid, but the stupidest are their plans to increase their efforts at gun control, in opposition to the Second Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America. The Constitution clearly states that no law shall be made that “INFRINGES” on the right of ALL AMERICANS to be armed for self defense. Yet they spend most of their time hatching and passing many laws, each one of which DOES “infringe” on that right. Never mind their laws only stop the law-abiding (who mostly are NOT the problem) from getting guns, leaving them DEFENSELESS against the guns in the hands of the people who do not OBEY laws (who ARE the problem). There has not been a single law passed that actually stops a criminal or other miscreant from getting a gun. At the same time, they DISARM the law-abiding, making them DEFENSELESS, and INCREASING “gun crime.” We keep telling them this, but they keep ignoring that, and then they vilify us for saying it, without answering our charges with facts. That’s because there ARE no facts to support their position. (Wall Street Journal)

Protecting Unborn Babies

If I’d have told you, years ago (before Roe v. Wade) that politicians (and average human beings) would not only approve of murdering infants before they’re even born and getting away with it, you’d have called me a liar. Then if I told you the chief murderer, when an investigation of their operations is attempted, would be able to get a million dollar judgment against the investigator, you wouldn’t have believed that, either. But that’s what it has come to. In Nazi Germany, they murdered 6 million Jews in their Holocaust. It is known that the German people, although they knew about those murders, said nothing and did nothing about it, and people just couldn’t understand how good people could ignore the murder of 6 million people because of their religious views. Now we come to our own Holocaust. The murders of millions of helpless infants, not because we disagree with their religious or political views, but just because somebody didn’t want to be bothered to raise that baby to adulthood after engaging in unprotected sex. Who know what kind of human beings we’ve lost because of this? What if Albert Einstein had been murdered in his mother’s womb? Or Albert Schweitzer? Or any number of other people who have made our lives easier through their existence? I maintain that those who murder unborn infants ought to be taken out and shot. If that puts me in a minority, so be it. I don’t care. Those children are too important to me. (Just common sense)

Dictatorial--and They're Stupid

Kamala Harris, one of many Dumocrat presidential candidates is really stupid. I think that’s a requirement. She thinks she can ban private gun sales by executive action when (IF) she becomes president. Fortunately, that ain’t never gonna happen. She’s no more likely to become president than I am, and I’m not even running. These stupid Dumocrats have a strange idea of what the executive orders are for, and what they can do. Executive Orders ONLY tell government employees and entities what they can do, and are supposed to do. They are NOT laws, and do not apply to anybody outside of government. They will never realize this. They’re not smart enough. It’s almost as if the Dumocrats don’t WANT to win the election. They constantly come out with things like, “We’re gonna raise your taxes!” Or “We’re gonna take your guns!” Or “we’re gonna let MEN into women’s restrooms and you can’t do anything about it, or we’ll call you names!” They say there are more than two sexes, even though that is biologically impossible, and, just because they say it, we’re supposed to believe it, or they call us names. Why these fools think they will have dictatorial powers as president is beyond me. I’m not that stupid. (Breitbart)

It Took An "Investigation?"

CNN did an “investigation (I don’t know how many dollars they spent in their “investigation”) and “discovered” what we already know: “criminals don’t obey laws.” I’ve been telling them that, all along, but they refuse to believe me, in favor of their preconceived notions that all they have to do to “reduce gun crime” is to pass a law, and, magically, all the lawbreakers will obey it. When are these people going to wake up and realize that the ONLY real solution to the “gun crime problem” is to arm the law-abiding, so they can defend themselves against the law breakers, who obey no laws? CNN “discovered” that, when filling out that form to pass a background check (which can get them ten years in prison for lying), thousands of criminals LIED on that form, and only about 12 were ever prosecuted. Not enforcing laws already on the books serves to INCREASE crime, but the “authorities” continue to do it. They also fail to prosecute violators of the “illegally-armed” laws by dropping those charges to gain convictions in other crimes. That’s just lazy police work. There are other ways to get convictions. CNN at least now realizes that criminals don’t obey laws. But will they remember when it comes time to support or not support the next “flight of fancy” the anti-gun fools call a “gun law?” (Town Hall)

Democrats Frighten Me

And I’m mostly not afraid of anything. If you listen to the current crop of Dumocrats running for president, you’d think they figure they’re running for DICTATOR. They all want to BAN this, ban that, and ban the other thing if they get elected. At least one has promised to ELIMINATE a necessary industry (the coal industry) and put thousands of people out of work because of an IMAGINARY thing they call global warming/climate change, which is based on the silly idea that MAN can actually affect the CLIMATE, and thus can “make it all better” if we just give them more money. They’ve gotten to the point in their support of this con that they now want to make laws making being a “climate denier” a punishable crime, since they can’t answer the logical arguments against it and want them to go away.

And they promise all kinds of giveaway programs, supported by TAKING money from those who can, and will EARN it, and GIVING it, in one way or another, to those who don’t. Some want to give free college tuition, not paid for by them, but paid for by YOU, if you work and earn money. The actual cost for just ONE of these programs is IMMENSE, but they don’t want to talk about that. One said, in answer to a question about how she would pay for what she promised, said, “There’s always money.” One father, who PAID for his daughter’s college, asked her if he would get his money back. She had no answer. They’re ALL socialists, which is a system BASED on THEFT of money from those who EARN their way for the benefit of those who want to live at the expense of somebody else. It’s not THEIR money they’re giving away, it’s YOURS. And they promise to make laws FORCING you to pay for it all. (Just common sense)

Dangerous? Or Just Confused?

Corey Booker has no idea what he’s talking about, and that’s dangerous, because he’s in a position to be able to get laws made that affect us all. As a lawmaker, he is supposed to have at least a passing knowledge of the Constitution, but he apparently does not. He thinks he can make a law to confiscate all the legally-owned firearms and imprison, maybe even KILL those who will not turn them over. That’s in spite of the fact that the Second Amendment to the Constitution of the United States FORBIDS making such a law because it would be an abridgment upon our constitutional RIGHT to “bear arms.” Apparently he thinks he can just ignore that, but he cannot. The Constitution is the very BASIS for ALL our laws. All laws made must conform to the Constitution, or they are not laws, at all. They do not exist. He also thinks gun owners should be required to get a federal license in order to own a gun, with certain restrictions, yet to be revealed. Never mind that is an “abridgment” on a constitutional right. He compares gun ownership to driving a car, in that driving a car requires a license. But driving a car is NOT a constitutional right. Gun ownership IS. (Daily Caller)

They Won't Hear Of It

The anti-gun fools are being told in many places that the BEST way to “reduce gun crime” is to allow the law-abiding to have their own guns to use in defending themselves against the millions of illegally-owned guns there are out there in the hands of criminals and other miscreants. But they consistently deny that solution in favor of their plethora of useless, INEFFECTIVE “anti-gun laws” that do NOTHING to stop, or even slow down “gun crime.” You ask them why they continue to support these useless laws and they never answer because there IS no cogent answer. So they just start immediately calling you names, hoping to divert you into defending yourself against those names. Meanwhile, where “concealed carry” is allowed, crime generally, and gun crime specifically, is down. Why? Because the “bad guys” can’t be sure their intended victims will not be armed, and able to resist their attacks, maybe even killing them. So they decide not to commit that crime. Or if they do, they can get killed, reducing crime, one criminal at a time. Anti-gun fools tell us defensive uses of guns doesn’t happen. Which is belied by the fact that it DOES happen, millions of times a year. (Bearing Arms)

"Facts Don't Matter"

That’s what House Majority Leader Nancy Peelosi said about impeaching President Trump. “The thing that matters is the accusation!” That this turns one of our most cherished concepts on its head doesn’t seem to occur to her, or even bother her. That concept it that a defendant is innocent until PROVEN guilty. She says, “The only important thing is the accusation. We don’t have to prove he did bad things, he has to prove he did not.” What that means is Trump must prove a negative, which cannot be done. They’ve turned jurisprudence on its head with this. Even a murderer is afforded the assumption of innocence until the prosecutor comes up with EVIDENCE of his guilt. The whole idea that the ACCUSATION is more important than the facts is ludicrous. Trump’s daughter famously ignored CNN reporter Jim Acosta the other day when he tried to ask her how she felt about being the daughter of an impeached president. An obviously incendiary question. Instead of giving him the cold shoulder, she should have asked him if he ever stopped beating his wife. Then he would have to convince people he never did. Sauce for the goose, and all that. (Just common sense)

Discrimination Against Gun Owners

That seem to be what we’re up against these days. It has begun with banks unilaterally closing the bank accounts of any business having anything to do with guns, and other banks refusing to loan money to them. This is rank discrimination, and is worse than the discrimination that was waged against black people for many years. In most cases, at least, black people could get loans, and open bank accounts in most places. Anti-gun fools are waging a campaign for other institutions to begin discriminating against gun people, too. What they can’t do by legislation, they hope to do by intimidation and discrimination. The Second Amendment remains as a bulwark against laws to limit our right to own and use the means to self defense, a gun, or any other tool for that purpose. Even so, the cops seem to want to take away from us, any kind of item that can be used for self defense. I was even told by a cop one day that the metal flashlight he saw sticking out of my back pocket could be considered a deadly weapon and, I’m sure that, if I ever used it in self defense, he’s want to take it away from me. But there are some things they can’t take away if used for self defense—like any heavy object that can be thrown at an attacker to disable him. (Outdoor Life)

Gun-Grabbers Hate It

Great Britain has some of the stiffest anti-gun laws going outside of pure dictatorships, which ban guns totally, except for “government agents” of one sort or another. Yet guns are still “pouring into the UK,” in spite of all of their laws. Just as they do in communist China, which is one of those dictatorships. At the same time, in places where concealed carry is allowed in the United States, crime is DOWN. Especially “gun crime.” The anti-gun fools ignore such things because they do not push forward their faulty agenda. They say that, “If we can just get all guns off the streets, we can reduce crime,” which ignores the fact that we have already done that by allowing more and more law-abiding citizens to be armed for self defense, assuring that more and more illegally-armed criminals will be killed or caught, after their hospital stay from being shot by their intended victims. This definitely reduces “gun crime,” one criminal at a time. In the UK, they’re working hard to stem the influx of illicit guns into their country, stiff anti-gun laws notwithstanding. At the same time, KNIFE crime is increasing, along with “gun crime.” Proving again what I have long said, that if they can’t get guns, criminals will just use something else with which to commit their crimes. But they will keep committing their crimes. (Truth About Guns)

The Impeachment Scam

That’s what it is. An attempt by Dumocrats to reverse the effect of the 2016 election, just because they think they can. They lied and lied during “hearings” in the House, which is controlled by Dumocrats, the opposing party to Trump’s. Not a single Republican in the House voted FOR impeachment. The whole thing is “sour grapes,” and an attempt to gain total control over our government. A COUP. That’s what we’re watching. An attempt to make Trump’s removal from office LOOK legal. It pains me to watch the very corrupt politicians Trump has promised to “bring to justice” as he “drains the swamp” pretend they are on a “righteous campaign” to rid ourselves of a corrupt president. Meanwhile, Trump ignores them and goes about his business, making all our lives better through his works. Obama told us those millions of jobs that went overseas were “long gone,” and wouldn’t be back, Trump brought them back as one of his first jobs. Obama told us a bad economy was “the new normal” and we should “get used to it.” Trump not only brought jobs back, he caused unemployment to drop to record lows while the Stock Market enjoyed multiple record highs. Lows that had NEVER been seen before and highs that had never been seen. He has made agreements that no president before him has ever been able to do—all while the opposing party spent ALL their time trying to block his every move. If not in the Congress, in the courts, using their liberal judges. (Just common sense)

Just Make It Up

If the law doesn’t agree with what you’re trying to do, just misdirect the citizens by lying to them. That’s what Dumocrat presidential candidate Pete Buttface...er, Buttigieg is doing to the Second amendment, and it’s working with some of the people who think he should end up at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave., in DC, because they’re ignorant, and he wants to keep them that way. He is now telling them that his anti-gun fool proposals all “are compatible” with the Second Amendment. Nothing could be further from the truth. He wants all of Bloomberg’s atrocities, plus he wants to ban completely what he calls “weapons of war” like the AR-15, because such weapons “have no business in our neighborhoods.” Why then, are there so many of them that were sold ILLEGALLY, already in our neighborhoods? When a law-abiding citizen is faced with an AR-15, he needs an AR-15 or something like it, to have “parity” with the illegal armament in the hands of the bad guys. But that’s an aside. His proposals are NOT “compatible with the Second Amendment. The Second says, “[T]he right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall NOT BE INFRINGED,” (Emphasis mine -RT) and every law he proposes IS an “infringement” on that right. (Breitbart)

It Must Be Nice

It must be nice to be a subjectivist. Then you can imagine things as you wish they were, and think it’s real. That’s how it is with the anti-gun fools. They haven’t passed a single law that actually DID something about “gun crime,” but now they’re claiming victory because they’ve managed to get a bunch of stupid laws that do NOTHING passed, in spite of the works of those who KNOW their laws are stupid and ineffective. They say the shooting in Florida at Stoneman High School “galvanized” the anti-gun nuts to make even more useless, ineffective laws against guns (they didn’t put it exactly that way, but that’s how it is to those of us with some degree of INTELLIGENCE). They say “2018 is the year we turned the tide on ending gun violence.” Riiiigghhtt! Without making a single law that does ANYTHING about “gun violence.” Way to fool yourself, people! Yes, you got some laws passed. And you were able to pressure some companies into making other stupid rules that get the law-abiding killed, while the law BREAKERS still bring their guns and kill people. That’s not progress. You’re fooling yourselves. And others. (Huffington Post)

There Should Be Limits

The big problem with politics today is the Dumocrats and their practice of using impeachment as a “bludgeon” on President Trump. One Dumocrat has confidently predicted MANY attempts at impeaching President Trump if this one does not succeed. As such she is ADMITTING that this one will NOT succeed, and multiple attempts in the future are planned. Even now. Of course, they will use unchecked taxpayer money to do it. They have already spent more than $50 million dollars in their efforts to get rid of President Trump, and they want to spend even more. There should be a limit on how many times one president can be impeached when the opposite party controls the House, where impeachment articles must originate. And the Congress must “shut off the money supply” after too many attempts. The very people attempting to impeach Trump are the ones Trump has promised to expose, and they are trying valiantly to get rid of Trump before he can expose them. (Just common sense)

Disarming the Cops

I frankly don’t understand the thinking of the fools who want to DISARM themselves, AND the cops, in order to “stop gun crime.” It is counterproductive to those of us with the ability to THINK logically. If someone comes at you with a gun, you CANNOT defend yourself with an empty hand. That is a fact that anti-gun fools just can’t seem to figure out. So, five years after 20 people were killed or injured in Santa Barbara, the Student Government at UC California is considering BANNING armed police on campus. UNBELIEVABLE in it’s stupidity! It wasn’t a cop who did the killing in Santa Barbara five years ago. It was the cops who STOPPED it when they FINALLY got there. But they still want to disarm the cops on campus. Are they taking stupid pills, or what? The absolute BEST way to stop a campus shooting is with ARMED people on campus. People who are THERE when the shooting begins—not those who are MINUTES away. That gunman can kill many people in those minutes, probably some of them unarmed cops. An unarmed cop is a USELESS cop when an armed man comes to kill people. I just don’t know what they’re thinking—if they’re thinking, at all. (Campus Reform)

Gun Laws Are Misguided

They don’t stop criminals and other law breakers from getting guns. They never have, in spite of the fact that misguided politicians rush to make more of them every time some fool misuses a gun. Every law against gun ownership for law-abiding people ASSUMES that the law-abiding are the problem in “gun crime.” They are NOT. It is the CRIMINALS who are the problem, and no amount of anti-gun laws are going to stop them from their “gun crime.” If they are contemplating a much more serious crime like robbery or even a mass shooting, why in HELL would they give a moment’s worry over breaking a silly little law that say they can’t be armed when committing their other crimes? As long as those laws are based on “getting rid of guns,” they will FAIL to “reduce gun crime.” The anti-gun fools have to know that, but they ignore it, in their quest to disarm ALL Americans, for whatever reason. If they ever came up with a law (doubtful) that actually WOULD reduce gun crime without disarming the law-abiding, I’d be right there with them. Buy it ain’t agonna happen, because there AREN’T any laws that would do that. (Informed Conservative)

Crooks Prosecuting Cops

That’s what’s happening in DC, right now. The very people Trump needs to be investigating and prosecuting for their crimes are the very ones that are attempting to prosecute HIM. And they’re using public money to do it. “Pencil Neck” Schiff, Jerry Nadler, Nancy Peelosi, and a few others are the very corrupt, cooked politicians Trump has promised to “bring to justice,” and this whole impeachment thing is their attempt to stop him before he gets to them. There needs to be an appreciation of the conflict of interest there in those particular people being “appointed” to “prosecute” Trump in the Senate. It’s like letting a murderer file charges against the prosecutor and the police so they can’t prosecute him. If the impeachment process must be continued, after the House (Dumocrat-controlled) started it, other people should be the ones “trying” it, not the very corrupt, crooked politicians Trump is after. And there should be limits on how much taxpayer money can be spent on it. They have already spent $50 million dollars on it—and that’s a low estimate. (Just common sense)

Media Disappointed

They hyped a riot, and it didn’t happen. Imagine thousands of armed people showing up, and not a single shot being fired. “Black Face” Governor Northam worked very hard to create a riot that would have discredited the thousand of armed attendees, but they didn’t cooperate. Yes, they brought their guns. But nobody fired a shot. CNN even published a story labeled, “Virginia Gun Fight,” about a gun fight that happened in—Kansas City (Virginia?). Talk about fake news! Northam would have been ecstatic if somebody had been shot to death (as long as it wasn’t him, of course), just to prove his point. But it didn’t happen. “Wiser heads” prevailed. This was all a “put-up job” designed to build support for his largely unconstitutional anti-gun laws. But it didn’t work. Logic prevailed, and it only proved how responsible legal gun owners are. I seriously doubt he will survive the next election, if he isn’t recalled before that. He's so desperate, he's trying to pass a law making criticizing a government official a criminal offense. Talk about a "wannabe despot!" (Red State)

Parents Favor Armed Teachers

No, not FORCING teachers to arm themselves, ALLOWING them to bring their already legally-carried guns to work with them, so as to be able to defend their students in case some crazed gunman comes in with his legal or illegally-owned gun and decides to kill a few children. Liberals always oppose the real solutions to problems that are recommended by others, and almost all liberals are anti-gun fools. Liberals try to convince us there are more than two sexes, and that men can menstruate. Both impossibilities; but that never stops a liberal from trying to FORCE us to accept their silly notions as “fact,” or vilifying us if we disagree. Letting legally-armed teachers bring their guns to school is, so far, the ONLY solution to “mass shooters” coming in to kill a few of their students. The cops aren’t a solution because, in the few minutes it usually takes for them to get there, that shooter can kill many children. The teachers are already there, and the shooter can’t identify those who ARE armed, as they can with a UNIFORMED “school resource officer” and kill them first. Teachers and other school staff are as responsible in their actions as are most cops, and if trained properly, are a real deterrent. But anti-gun fools won’t even ENTERTAIN the idea. Schools are a “gun-free zone,” which is an “engraved invitation” to potential shooters. EVERY mass shooting, in schools or otherwise, has occurred IN a “gun-free zone. So why can’t anti-gun fools realize that? They don’t have a better answer, so why keep opposing a real solution? Just STUPID, I guess. (Rasmussen Reports)

Sorry About Yesterday

I had a doctor’s appointment for a breathing test that was supposed to take only about 30 minutes. But which turned into all day, with a CAT Scan, multiple tests, and me running back and forth all over the clinic (or as close to running as I do) from one office to the next. I didn’t get out of there until 7 PM. And I was “out of gas.” So I drove home and went to bed (I am 80 years old, after all).

"No Joy In Mudville"

Nancy Peelosi proclaims there there is “no joy in this impeachment,” then goes on TV and does a long “gloat session” with an interviewer I will not name, saying, “Impeachment is forever.” Yes, it is, Nancy. Both in this instance and the one where your close friend, Bill Clinton was impeached on real charges. But that didn’t even slow him down, since he was acquitted by a then Dumocrat-controlled Senate, and then re-elected by a gullible electorate. The difference here is that the very charges against President Trump are phony and cannot be proven. That’s why Peelosi says “it’s not about proof,” hoping somebody will buy the bullsh-t that the only important thing is the charges, “never mind we can’t prove them.” But the important thing to remember is that impeachment is only a fancy word to mean “an accusation.” And unless those charges are PROVEN in the Senate, the impeachment means NOTHING. What we need to remember here is that those “charges” are nothing more than the “pipe dreams” of the Dumocrats, and they only came up with them by picking something they could DEFINE as “an impeachable offense” to use in voting in a Dumocrat-controlled House to impeach the best president we’ve ever had. Even better than Reagan, and that takes some doing. Not a single Republican in the House voted in favor of impeachment. Yes, “impeachment IS forever.” Even if it means NOTHING but an asterisk next to a name in history. (Just common sense)

Bloomberg Wants More Guns

For HIS protection, that is, not yours. He is demanding more ARMED guards for his appearance at Johns Hopkins University. He says, and I quote: “When you have a city that has the murder rate that Baltimore has, I think it’s ridiculous to think that they shouldn’t be armed.” So he’s worried about his own safety, as he should be. But he worries not about YOUR safety in the same places. Notwithstanding the danger, he still wants to DISARM you. It’s a typical “disconnect” between what he pushes on the rest of us, and reality. He wants protection for himself, while denying it to the rest of us. But he’s a billionaire. He can afford to hire his guns, while most of us cannot. We have to be our own “armed guards” every day. But he wants to make that impossible, with all the stupid, useless, unenforceable anti-gun laws he wants to put into effect. This is true of most of the anti-gun fools out there who want to make us all DEFENSELESS against the millions of ILLEGAL guns out there, in the hands of criminals, crazies, and Islamic terrorists (a growing problem). Another good example of this disconnect is Sen. Feinstein, one of the most prolific anti-gun fools, who caries her own gun, in addition to the “armed security” she can afford to hire, probably mostly being paid for by US (tax money). (Legal Insurrection)

Defective Thinking

More and more corporate entities are putting their customers’ (and employee's) lives at risk by banning legally-carried guns from their premises. Walgreen’s Drugs is one of those, and by so doing, have made pretty sure that law-abiding people won’t bring their guns with them, even if they are legally-licensed to do so—which, in itself is a violation of the “shall not be infringed” clause in the Second Amendment to the Constitution of the United states. That reminds me of the time a woman who was licensed to carry in Texas had to leave her gun in her car to go into a restaurant with her mom and dad, and had to watch while they were brutally murdered by a gunman who predictably didn’t obey that law that forced her to do so. The very fact that none of these laws will ever apply to people who don’t obey laws puts customers in places like Walgreen’s in grave danger. They will be completely DEFENSELESS when a criminal ignores the law and brings his gun, while the law-abiding cannot. And people will die because of it. But anti-gun fools don’t seem to care, as they go about making even more of their useless laws that only get people killed by keeping them disarmed. (Gun Free Zone)

"Crying In His Beer"

Virginia Governor Northam is frightened out of his panties at the imaginary possibility of violence upon himself during the upcoming “Lobbying Day” event that is expected to see 130,000 attendees, most them people who want to keep their constitutional RIGHT to “keep and bear arms,” something GUARANTEED in the Constitution, a document to which ALL LAWS must conform. But others are prepared to CREATE violence, not necessarily upon the governor, but so as to discredit the pro-gun folks. They are planning on sending in “agent provocateurs” to cause trouble and create violence. ANTIFA will probably be there, in force. That’s what that Dumocrat-created bunch does. And there will be many there with cameras, to record any violence that occurs, and play it up for all it’s worth. This is how politicians work. Especially Dumocrat politicians. But I’d bet Northam will be cowering in his office’s “safety room” while all this goes on. He knows he’s creating something that a MAJORITY of Virginians hate, and he thinks just because most of them have guns, they will use them on him. But that won’t happen unless HE has his “special police” try and confiscate their guns, which is against the law. (Washington Examiner)

Obama's A Liar!

Surprise, surprise! No kidding. I don’t think any president has told as many lies as has this one. Not even Bill Clinton, and that’s saying something. His most famous lies are, “If you like your doctor, you can keep him.” Or, “If you like your health care plan, you can keep it.” Or “Obamacare will reduce your health insurance cost by $2,500.00!” But the one represented here is all that crap he has been spouting about “The sea levels rising, putting all beachfront properties under water, very soon, if we don’t do something.” So now he has put almost $15 million into beach front property on Martha’s Vineyard, proving conclusively that he was LYING again when he spouted all that global warming/climate change crap. But then we know that about Barack Obama. He LIES to con us out of money, then he spends it, not caring if we can figure out he was lying before. He can’t do anything politically, any more, so why should he care if we’re onto him? He’s made his pile, and set up systems to add to it, right up to the time he dies. You know he lies. I know he lies. Dumocrats know he lies. They just won’t admit it, that their “hero” lies to get what he wants, just like all Dumocrats do. (Just common sense)

Guns Aren't the Problem

Every time some fool goes out and starts killing a bunch of people in a crowd, or even just one person, with a gun, the anti-gun fools start screaming for yet more “anti-gun laws.” And when anybody opposes them, they vilify them, saying they “wish for more people to be killed.” But I have one question to ask them: “What would you like us to do, that will WORK? Since none of your highly touted anti-gun laws have EVER stopped a single shooting? Just tell me something that will WORK, and I’ll be all for it.” Unfortunately, they have never come up with a single thing that will actually reduce “gun crime,” as we know it. And they won’t, because there IS nothing they can do, no law they can make, that will work, because the gun is NOT the problem. That fool with a gun in his/her hand IS the problem. We have to find a way to cause those fools NOT to decide to shoot people, with legal, or illegal guns. It’s like trying to out toothpaste back in the tube. Guns exist, there is NO WAY they’ll ever stop them from existing, and the ILLEGAL guns in existence number in the millions. Make all the laws they want, and potential shooters will ignore them because they are contemplating actions much worse than disobeying some piffy little law that says they can’t be armed. (Daily Caller)

Running for Dictator

That seem to be what the Dumocrats think they’re doing, whenever one of them comes up with yet another stupid promise. The things they promise are mostly unconstitutional, but they plan to push forward on them, anyway. The all are saying they’re going to take away your guns, despite the fact that the Second Amendment to the Constitution prohibits it. They plan to do it, anyway. They talk about “national gun buybacks,” but don’t tell you that they never pay the real market value of the guns. They set the price paid, and it’s always a lot lower than the actual value of the guns they force you to “sell” to them (allow them to steal). They offer “universal health care,” even though there isn’t enough money in the world to pay for that. Yes, they can “print money” with nothing behind it, but this inevitably creates inflation, which makes the money in existence worth less. It’s a way to tax you without having to tax you. Then they want to take over paying for a college education for everybody, which uses up even more money. They’re going to BAN everything they can think of, including things that involve personal property. And they’re going to make people capable and willing to EARN their own way pay for all this. They certainly aren’t going to be paying for all this largess. They think the presidency involves total power when it is a Dumocrat wielding it, but they question that power when it is a Republican wielding it. They spend $100 million dollars to get a job that only pays $200,000.00 a year. Where’s the logic in that? Oh. As usual, it’s not THEIR money, it’s yours. So they spend it like they stole it. They did. (Just common sense)

"And Liberals Went Nuts!"

You could put that down as a “boilerplate” headline because it’s one most often used, in one way or another. Every day Trump does something and they whine about it. NO matter what it is, good, or bad. If he lowers taxes, they whine about the lack of funding for their giveaway programs. If he raises taxes (not likely) they wonder about how the people will pay for it. They propose giveaway programs that will cost taxpayers $TRILLIONS of dollars, without saying who has to pay for them, and criticize Trump if he points that out. If Trump lets a fart, they complain about him “fouling the atmosphere.” These people are angry. They stay angry because Trump is doing what he should do—everything Dumocrats don’t want/ And they just can’t stand that. They’re used to having Republicans once in a while taking power and not doing the things they said they’d do to get elected. Then Trump comes in after promising the same things, and, lo and behold, he’s DOING it! And that frightens the left, no end. They just can’t see how they’re going to reverse all the good things he has done, and they’re afraid—very afraid. And if Trump gets re-elected—which he will—they’ll REALLY go nuts. (Just common sense)

Subjective Laws

Politicians love subjective laws because they are so vague they may be defined in any way that politician wishes. Take “bump stock bans,” for instance. With the advent of the bump stock ban, ANY rifle can be made into a “machine gun.” all it takes is for some unnamed, faceless bureaucrat to DEFINE it as such, and its owner suddenly becomes a law breaker, just for owning it. They love to make laws as wide and vague as possible so they may be used indiscriminately, just by somebody DEFINING something as being whatever is banned. Anti-gun fools especially love their laws to be vague and uncertain so they can make them into whatever they wish them to be, just by changing the definition of something, therefore bringing it under that law. Such laws allow corrupt politicians to cover whatever they want, since they are so vague as to make it possible. (AmmoLand)

She Wants to Be President

Everybody thinks Nancy Peelosi is only wanting to remove President trump from office just because she hates him, and the fact that he won the 2016 election, but they’re wrong. She wants to be president, and sees this as her only chance to ascend to the white House as its occupant. Yes, the first lawful successor if Trump gets removed is the vice president. But what if she is able to get him removed, too? The next in line is the Speaker of the House, a position she now holds. They already have articles of impeachment prepared for VP Pence, and will file them immediately of Trump gets “convicted” in the Senate. If they can then “convict” Pence, who will be president? Why Nancy Peelosi, of course. And that’s what this is all about. They’ve been working on this plot with that as the final result ever since Trump came down that escalator and declared his candidacy. The drive to remove President trump from office, followed by removing Pence, is aimed at getting Peelosi the presidency. It’s undeniable if you look at it with your eyes open We’ve never had a coup in this country (that we know of), but we are in the midst of one, now. And if the is successful in removing Trump from office, you can bet that Pence is next. It’s inevitable. Nancy wants to be president. (Wikipedia)

"Monument to White Supremacy"

That’s what fool liberals (Dumocrats) are now calling Mt. Rushmore. They say, “The faces of the four presidents (white conquerors) peer southeast toward a reservation housing vanquished Lakota, who mostly live out forgotten, impoverished lives…” Oh yes, those “poor natives” who routinely murdered settlers every day as they went about trying to “improve their lives,” as are today’s illegal aliens—but without violating the law in doing it. Indians, who delighted in torturing settlers to death in some of the most vile ways if they caught them, raping the women before murdering them, too. Indians, who knew nothing about owning property, but who murdered people for daring to come onto their land, hoping for a better life. Yes, the settlers may have done some damage to that land in their ignorance, but they eventually learned from their mistakes, and began improving the land, while the Indians did everything they could to stop them. Their statements are simply part and parcel of their efforts to CREATE hatred for white people so they may be successfully seen as “second class citizens” to black people. I’m just glad I’m old enough I won’t have to live under such a damned fool regime. They love to call us racist. But that is about the most racist thing I’ve seen. (Legal Insurrection)