Friday, October 27, 2017

Informant Gag Order

The question is simple: why the hell did Obama's DOJ apply a "gag order" to an informant who had significant information on a government "investigation?" Was the information he had something that would implicate Obama and/or Hillary Clinton in a crime? Was is a cover-up? It's very suspicious, and, unless Clinton or Obama forces KILL this informant, we'll find out soon--unless somebody is able to hide what he tells Congress. The Clintons have a reputation for having people who are due to testify about them get killed under very suspicious circumstances, with the locals covering it up like a cat in a litter box. I wouldn't want to be this informant in the next few days before he or she is scheduled to testify. Back watching is in order. The Clintons don't play nice. It's really too bad such an investigation is dependent on such people, with all the other evidence they have uncovered, but which has not been released, or acted upon because they're dealing with Dumocrats. (Western Journalism Center)

No comments: