Every so often we get a new "message" from bin Laden's grave. But the truth is a lot different from "common knowledge." Bin Laden's voice was detected regularly until [14 December 2001] by intelligence operatives monitoring radio transmissions in Tora Bora, according to the Pentagon. Since then, nothing has been heard from the al-Qa'eda leader and President Bush has hinted in private that bin Laden's silence could mean he has been killed. The London Telegraph called it "sick propaganda" when Bush hinted that bin Laden might be dead. But why IS it we have not heard his voice after that time, when we heard it regularly in "terrorist communications" until then? Why is it new "communications" are always from "his second-in-command," never from him (with proof that his message is really given TODAY?)? "With an ego the size of Mount Everest, Osama bin Laden would not have, COULD not have, remained silent for so long if he were still alive. He always liked to take credit even for things he had nothing to do with." (New York Times, July 11, 2002) I personally think bin Laden was "made into a crispy critter" many years ago when we bombed one of his caves in Afghanistan with him in it. Terrorists desperately want us to believe we "didn’t get bin Laden" so the liberals can keep on referring to us not even being able to get bin Laden, while knowing we did, along with Saddam. We just didn't "dig him out" of his "rat-hole" as we did Saddam. We just blew it up with him in it.
Saturday, May 17, 2008
The "Ghost of bin Laden"
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment