Impeach or Not Impeach:

That is the question. Whether to impeach President Trump for nothing or not impeach him for the same, that is the quandary. Dumocrats all hate President Trump with a passion because he whipped the crap out of them in the 2016 elections and has been slapping them silly ever since, and they can’t have that. He came out of nowhere and they thought he was just a joke. They thought he didn’t even want to be president. That he was running as a publicity stunt to promote his television work. Then he won. He won with the promise to “drain the swamp,” and he usually does what he promises. He also promised to reverse all the damage former President Obama did in his concerted efforts to destroy this government so he could convert it into a socialist nation, and he is doing just that. Obama failed in that effort, but he did much damage in his attempt. He had high hopes of getting his protege elected to follow him and continue his skulduggery, but Trump scotched that effort. And for that, he must pay. They want to impeach him, but for what? They can’t come up with anything REAL for which to impeach him, so they’re trying valiantly to manufacture something, even though they know their effort, even if successful in the House, where they have (temporary) control, it is doomed to failure when it reaches the Senate, where they do not. They hate him like they’ve hated no other president, with the possible exception of President Reagan. But they are doomed to failure again, and President Trump will win in 2020, against what seems like will be hundreds of Dumocrat candidates to oppose him. (Just common sense)

Deflecting the Blame

The headline reads: “Trump Tries to Deflect the Blame for Migrant Children’s Deaths.” Which, of course, makes it sound like Trump IS to blame—which he is NOT. Those children could NOT have died so soon after being in custody UNLESS there were things that were wrong with them, and ignored, for a long time before they were ever in custody. There is NO WAY Trump, or anybody else in our government, could possibly be responsible for those children’s deaths. That headline is DESIGNED to make Trump look like he’s to blame, when he is NOT. This is how the fake news boys operate. They write the headlines to ASSUME Trump’s responsible for anything bad, and let nature take it’s course. Pretty soon his responsibility, no matter how false it is, becomes a matter of “fact.” That’s how they destroy someone in the eyes of the voting public, which destroys their “approval rating,” and makes them less viable as a candidate for re-election, or anything else. It’s all based on ACCUSATIONS, with NO PROOF, and no factual basis. (Just common sense)

"Ah Ain't Afeered Uv Da NRA"

Mike Johnson, a former governor candidate in Colorado, based his entire candidacy on "not being affeered uv duh NRA.” Nowhere in his campaign literature that I could find gives us his party affiliation, but I suspect it is Dumocrat. They are the ones classically anti-gun fools. But that's true all over the spectrum of candidates who wish to hide their party affiliation in order to fool the voters. His web site promotes all the usual crap pushed by other anti-gun fools, such as banning high capacity magazines and bump stocks, and "gun violence restraining orders," none of which have EVER worked to reduce gun violence, because they are all aimed at the law-abiding, who usually are NOT the problem. Lawbreakers, who ARE the problem, routinely IGNORE these laws, and all the others pushed by other anti-gun fools. He glibly promises to "keep guns away from those who would do themselves or others harm." As if he could. Crimes are usually committed by people who obey NO LAWS, much less his silly laws. So how are his useless laws going to allow him to keep that promise? Like most anti-gun fools, he makes promises he can't keep, while he really BELIEVES he can do it. Until he finds out he can't, but by then he may have been governor for four or eight years, with people dying because he is WRONG. (Mike for Colorado)

Spending Other People's Money

That’s what Dumocrats are good at. Just about every Dumocrat candidate for president in 2020 has advanced plans to give away other people’s money in order to buy votes from those who want others to pay their way. They think that kind of fool is in the majority, and they’re wrong. They were wrong in 2016 when they posited similar giveaway plans, hoping that would get Hillary elected to an office she isn’t smart enough to hold. They failed. “Pocahontas” Elizabeth Warren wants to cancel student debt for many students. “Crazy Bernie” Sanders wants to have the government pay for all our medical bills, student debt, and many other things as he promotes his socialist ideas to the gullible. And the gullible are the only people who would buy his silly ideas—ideas that failed big time in Russia and Venezuela, and is in the process of failing in Cuba and other countries. Dumocrats have always been good at spending other people’s money. One of the most famous attempts was that famous Dumocrat line from history, “A Chicken In Every Pot.” A promise they knew they could never fulfill, but they confidently promised it, anyway, to get the votes of the gullible. (CNBC)

What's Wrong With People?

What is there about religion that drives some people to go into churches of all kinds, and kill people while they’re praying to their God? Religion is supposed to be about love, and life, and finding your way into Heaven. We should not have to have armed guards on duty while parishioners pray, but that’s what we are facing, today. In Poway, California, in San Diego County, a gunman entered a synagogue and started shooting, killing one (so far) and wounding three others—for what? Because he hated Jews? What is there to hate about Jews, anyway? Others hate Muslims, and still more hate Christians, of all stripes. Why? Why does one person hate another because of his religious beliefs? What I, for instance, believe, should not be something somebody else should try and kill me for. My beliefs are my own, and so are those of that other person. They should not be something to kill over. But apparently they are, to some people. Shootings at other synagogues and at Mosques, and Christian churches, bother me because of the stupidity of it all. Is there some kind of a plot here where someone, or some agency is PROMOTING violence against religion and the houses of worship? Is this all part of a known campaign against religion of all kinds? I don’t know. And that is what disturbs me greatly. (Just common sense)

One Little Word

That seems to be all it takes to allow the government to violate one of the most important amendments in the Constitution. That word is "dangerous." I've wondered why I've been seeing that word so often with reference to guns. The answer is simple. Laws are being written to include that word because, if bureaucrats decide (on their own) that you are "dangerous," they can forever deny you your Second Amendment right to own and use a gun for any reason, let alone self defense. And it is so easy to be labeled "dangerous" it's funny. All one person in government needs to do is apply that label to you, and your Second Amendment rights are GONE. And. so far, there's no way to get that label reversed. Once it is applied, that's it. Five states have these laws already, following the Parkland School shooting, and 19 states are working to pass the laws."it doesn’t take much for the government to decide you’re “dangerous.”Say the wrong thing on Facebook… get reported by a left-wing neighbor… make someone uncomfortable by carrying in public… Boom. They show up on your doorstep and search your house for weapons." Then they "confiscate" (steal) any they find, and you're disarmed. On the strength of the opinion on ONE bureaucrat. Or just a disgruntled neighbor. You need to take an interest in what the legislature is doing in your state, lest YOU get labeled as a "dangerous person" whether or not you are. You need to do everything you can to fight the passage of such laws, or become a criminal if you go out and buy a gun, anyway, to replace the one(s) they stole.". (Just common sense)

Chuck's Meltdown

It’s funny how Dumocrats “melt down” over something they can CLAIM violates ethics or even the law, while ignoring one of their own (Hillary) who actually did it (The Steele dossier). Trump truthfully said he’d LISTEN if a foreign source told him that “had something on” an opposition candidate, while NOTIFYING THE FBI as well. They translated that to mean “collusion” with foreigners to get elected. They’re desperate to legitimize that “Russian collusion” fantasy. Although they completely ignored it, and continue to ignore the fact that Hillary actually PAID a former British spy to falsify information received from a Russian source. Trump just said he’d LISTEN while notifying the FBI. Hillary not only listened, she paid “big bucks” to Steele to create that phony “dossier.” and she did NOT “notify the FBI.” the double standard here is so obvious that only stupid people could miss it. And we know all about how stupid Dumocrats are. They confirm it every time they announce a new stupid idea like there are more than 2 sexes, a biological impossibility. (Viral Buzz)

"Chicken In Every Pot!"

That is the famous Dumocrat promise back in the forties and fifties, and something they never delivered. But that’s nothing new, the Dumocrats make many promises, and the NEVER deliver on them—ever. They depend on the short memories of the voters, who never seem to notice that they never deliver on their promises. When they make all kinds of new promises, their constituents assume they will deliver, in spite of overwhelming evidence to the contrary. Today, Dumocrat presidential candidates are again promising many things. like “Medicare for all,” and “forgiving student loans,” or just paying for tuition costs for all, period. What they never mention is how they are going to accomplish all this largess. The answer is to steal money from the producers of new wealth to pay for it, and the extremely high taxes this would require. The very COST to do these things is so high tit would require close to a 100% tax rate, on everybody, to accomplish. And soon, the producers of new wealth, those who are willing, and able to EARN for themselves, discover that most of what they earn is taken away, so they stop earning, and soon there is nothing for the Dumocrats to steal to pay for their giveaway programs, and society collapses, as it did in Russia, and is NOW doing, in Venezuela. That always happens under socialism--which is what they promise--when they run out of other people’s money. (Just common sense)

Displaying Their Ignorance

It amazes me how many politicians base their campaigns on their IGNORANCE of reality. In this specific instance I'm talking about gun control. Gun control doesn't work. It has NEVER worked, and won't ever work in the future. Yet they base their very CAMPAIGNS on something they have to know doesn't work, and they still get elected. This in spite of the fact that the majority of Americans are unalterably OPPOSED to gun control, which is unconstitutional, and makes it easier for lawbreakers to victimize the law-abiding, who are the only people who OBEY their laws. "Gun-free zones," for example, are places where you are not supposed to bring a gun, and law-abiding people leave their guns at home, even if they have "carry" licenses. Then when a lawbreaker, who obeys NO laws, TARGETS that zone BECAUSE there are most likely to be no guns there, and kills them. There is not a single place a mass shooting has occurred that is NOT in a "gun-free zone." Gun-free zones get people KILLED. Yet these ignorant politicians keep creating them, law-abiding people obey them, and get killed. So the anti-gun fools DEMAND more of them, and those ignorant politicians give them more, and more people DIE. Criminals in prison freely tell us they LIKE "gun-free zones" for the very REASON they are "gun-free." This is just ONE of their silly, stupid, USELESS laws that don't work, and get people killed by lawbreakers, who routinely IGNORE them. (Just common sense)

Democrats Are Fools

They think increasing taxes, and telling the electorate they will do so will get them elected in 2020, against all the good things President Trump has been able to accomplish in just two years, plus what he will do in the next two years. Yes, they do control the media (or it controls them), and Trump will have a hard time getting his message out. But Trump is resourceful, and he WILL get his message out, whether or not they like it. They promote many fool ideas, ideas that go completely against the grain of the American people. Ideas like “getting rid of whiteness, as is actually taught in liberal Seattle.” Or that there are more than two sexes. Or that we should allow MEN to enter women’s restrooms and changing rooms. Then there are those who think a man can actually BECOME a woman by thinking of himself as a woman. They have even tried to prove that a man can menstruate, and give birth. They think that, if they promote ignorant, impossible things often enough, people will begin to believe the impossible. The problem is, they are fooling a huge portion of the electorate, so they are a real danger. And they cheat, steal, and even get people killed to promote their ignorant ideas and get elected. But hopefully, enough intelligent Republicans will “come out of the woodwork” because of their excesses to “whip them again,” as Trump did in 2016. (Just common sense)

"Cops Kill More Blacks"

Liberals like to talk about the “fact” that the cops use “more draconian policing” in black areas of town. What “Draconian” means, I’m not sure. But they DO apply more policing in areas where the most crime occurs, especially gun crime. Liberals like to talk about cops killing black men “21 times more often than white men.” Not revealed is the unalterable fact that more black men shoot at cops than do white men, and when they do, they just might get shot. Again, not mentioned is the fact that the guns the black men use in most cases are gotten ILLEGALLY, on the black market, and the anti-gun laws liberals get passed would do nothing to prevent this. Not usually mentioned any time is the fact that in almost ALL cases of a misuse of guns it is an ILLEGAL gun that is used. Anti-gun laws only apply to LEGAL gun owners, who usually are not the problem. Ignored are the users of illegal guns, who ARE. There is a disconnect here, and no amount of anti-gun laws are going to stop the bad guys from getting their guns illegally. In fact, all those laws do, beyond making easy targets of the law-abiding, is create a black market for what is made illegal. (Conservative Review)

"Good Guy" Thwarts Shooters

The anti-gun fools say it doesn't happen. But FBI figures expose the LIE. Recent FBI figures released show cases where EIGHT "active shooters" were thwarted by "good guys with or without guns." Cops can't be everywhere. It takes them, at best, MINUTES to arrive at the location of an "active shooter" report. In those minutes, a shooter can kill many innocent people. In one recent case, it took them 45 minutes to get there. Realists within the ranks will tell you that an armed populace is good, although the police politicians in the higher ranks, many of whom have either never been "in the ranks" or have forgotten what it was like, may tell you otherwise. But the unalterable fact is that a person ALREADY on site with a gun, and the training and willingness to use it, CAN, and DO stop "active shooters," no matter what police politicians and other anti-gun fools tell us. Anti-gun fools confidently assure us that the cops CAN protect is, but that's a LIE. All they can usually do is document the "crime scene," get rid of the body or bodies, and MAYBE someday find the killer. Unfortunately, the number of unsolved murder cases on the books is large. Too large. Which shows that they CAN'T protect us, and realists in the ranks will be the first to tell you that. (Bearing Arms)

Liberal Looniness

Liberals are loons. The proof is in what they sponsor as “reasonable.” I won’t even go into their anti-gun laws. They’re the heights of looniness because they just don’t work. Liberals have to know that, but they insist on making more and more of them, every day. Other evidence of their looniness is their efforts to convince us there are more than two sexes, which is a biological impossibility. Then there is their support for “intellectually challenged” people’s insistence that they can change their sex because they ‘feel like a woman (man) that day. Now comes a Seattle yoga class that is billed as “an exercise in undoing whiteness.” Imagine the outcry if they had introduced a class in “undoing blackness?” That aside, how do you “undo whiteness? Your skin color is dictated by nature. Black, white, yellow, red, that cannot change, except by fictitious measures. A white person for instance, can, spend a lot of time in a tanning booth to “appear” darker than they are naturally. But that does not change the natural color of their skin, and will soon wear off, necessitating repeated tanning booth visits. Liberals promote loony ideas every day, and they’re always coming up with more looniness. And only the loony vote for their friends, the Dumocrats. (Daily Caller)

I Love San Francisco

The way it used to be. I haven’t been there for many years since I lived there for some time way back in the nineties. One of the things I liked most was the dependability of the mass transit services. Something that is usually missing in most cities. And the quaintness of many things there, like the cable car system, which most take for granted, and people ride without making a connection to the bus service, the trolley buses, the streetcars, and the like, all supplemented by Bart, their subway system. But liberals have destroyed this city. Their policies have become so obviously bad with the advent of human beings squatting and defecating in the streets without anybody doing anything about it. I saw a map one man had prepared of the locations of the deposits of excrement on the streets, and, except for one corner on the northwest side, completely covered the city. This is probably the worst example of the failure of liberal policies in any city, especially in a city that has always been different from other cities, and very quaint in its offerings. Now it offers mostly brown stain on your shoes, since you can’t walk anywhere there without encountering a brown, stinking, pile of dung. And that’s a tragedy. Not only for those living there, but for people like me, who might want to go back there once in a while, just to enjoy the ambiance, without smelling dung. (Just common sense)

UN: "Disarm Your People"

The United Nations is run by dictators from all over the world. They just don't understand a country that allows its citizens to be armed for self defense, even against its own government. None of them have such a thing, so their first answer to "the gun problem" is to take guns away from the law-abiding. That this makes it even easier for the lawbreakers to victimize the law-abiding doesn't enter into their thinking. They confidently tall us how effective are laws that keep guns out of the hands of the law-abiding, completely ignoring figures that prove that to be a LIE. They have to be aware of the fact that NONE of those laws have ever done ANYTHING to stop, or even slow down "gun violence." They just go about making even more of such laws while the law-abiding die from the wounds inflicted by those who routinely IGNORE all their laws. What is their purpose? That's easy. They want to be able to come to your home at some later date and "confiscate" (steal) your property, and they don't want to meet a gun in your hands when they do. The fools running the UN think we can just "make another law" to further disarm our people so our government (and the UN later, they think) can bully us into submission, as they have in other countries. (UN News)

Trump Wins Again!

He has accomplished something various presidents have been trying, and failing to do for 20 years: get Mexico to actually obey their own laws and HELP stop illegal immigration into the United States. The Dumocrats are not happy. They are accusing him of “being a bully” for threatening tariffs on Mexican goods if they didn’t capitulate. I guess we’re not supposed to do something real if it “makes somebody feel bad.” There is nothing good Trump does they can’t “spin” into something bad. They are much more interested in their Trump hatred than they are in doing something good for this country. I have said before, if Trump “walked on water,” they’d criticize him for “disrupting the flow.” They’ll probably now blame him for that helicopter crash in New York City. He had nothing to do with it, but that doesn’t matter to them. Anything they can say to make him look bad, they’ll say. He’s used to winning, and he wins more than he loses. That’s a fact that Dumocrats can’t fathom. They think they can defeat him by lying about him, but the only people they will defeat is themselves. (Just common sense)

How Low We've Come

It is a shame how low we’ve gone in recent years, fueled by the liberal ideas that have become popular to those who wish to live at somebody else’s expense. They have found that they cannot answer the logical questions we ask when they spout nonsense and call it fact. It is illustrated by students being incensed at Williams College when it tries to adopt a “free speech policy.” They know they just can’t handle it when people are allowed to speak freely and say things with which they do not agree, and they think their ideas should take precedence over those of others at all costs. They RIOT to keep people with ideas they don’t agree with come to their campus to speak, because they know that if those people are “allowed” to speak, they will lose some support for their silly ideas. It’s pretty damned bad when they are angry because people who oppose their ideas are allowed to speak freely. It gives away their weaknesses because they can’t answer what they say. So they “demonstrate” to keep free speech from happening so nobody will know how silly are their ideas. (Legal Insurrection)

Unintended Consequences

I think this is a definitely unintended consequence of Obama's stance on guns. His presidency, and all its attempts at new and tighter gun laws has been very good for the gun industry and for gun owners—and would-be gun owners, period. The more he railed against gun ownership for law-abiding people, the more they bought guns. Why? Because they feared being HELPLESS against the MILLIONS of ILLEGAL guns, already out there in the hands of people who wish us ill. He, and the rest of the anti-gun fools discount that. They look upon suggestions that we arm the law-abiding with horror, as if they would “go wild” and create what they call a “wild west atmosphere,” where people get their guns out and shoot each other over a fender bender or something else minor. They don't think the bad guys would do that, even though they do, every day. Which is why gun deaths in Chicago and other liberal strongholds are so numerous. Chicago already HAS all their favorite “gun laws,” yet they also have one of the highest gun death numbers. But they're too damned stupid to realize this. (Washington Post)

Dems Trying to Lose?

Anyone who looks at what Dumocrats are pushing wonders if they really WANT to lose the 2020 election. Everything they promote seems to be against what the average American wants. They push the LGBT platform, and they should know that only a very small percentage of Americans are in favor of that. They push the “hate Trump” agenda, while at the same time Trump’s approval numbers are “sky high.” They “knock” American heroes; those men and women who faced death and came away alive in WWII to keep our country free.. They push transgenderism, pretending it is a major thing, when only a very small percentage of people are really in favor of men pretending to be women. They want to let MEN into women’s restrooms and changing rooms, while insisting there is more than one sex, a biological impossibility. They push socialism, a system based on the THEFT of the product of those willing to earn their own way for the benefit of those who would rather not earn anything, but wish to depend on the earners for their support. Everything Americans want, they’re against. Is this how you win elections? I don’t think so. (Just common sense)

"Selective Concern"

The liberal media never showed much concern about the safety of Rep. Scalise, who was the actual victim of a left-leaning gunman who opened fire on many government officials who were taking part in a charity baseball game. But now they’re oh, so worried about “death threats” to Muslim Rep Ilhan Omar after President Trump criticized her for her insensitive cracks after she attempted to minimize the effect of the 3,000 innocent deaths on 9/11, an atrocity perpetrated BY Muslims. That goes right along with the tendency of the liberal media to push Muslims, while holding other Americans back. They try and minimize what some Muslims do, all over the world, while “building up” Muslims in this country. I haven’t figured out what their motive is in promoting Muslims over Christians, and other religions, or anybody else, but I’m working on it. Extremists, who claim to be Muslims, have committed some of the most heinous crimes there are, culminating in the World Trade Center atrocity on 9/11, And Muslims think it’s “racism” to criticize a Muslim, in any way. They even created a phony name for it: Islamophobia, which attempts to attach a “mental aberration” to anyone who dares to criticize a Muslim, in any way. But being a Muslim is NOT a “race,” so it isn’t racism. And Islamophobia is a made-up, phony word to intimate a phony idea that criticism of Muslims is a “mental aberration.” It is NOT. And anybody who so much as uses that term to describe anybody is either deluded, or suspect. (Daily Caller)