The Worst Fake News

I've been aware for a long time that the liberal news media is corrupt. and like most liberals, it hates Donald Trump with a passion that would get it ENDED in a totalitarian country. But this picture of "caged children" that was published widely after an illegal alien reporter Tweeted it is about the worst I've seen. The only problem is, it wasn't real. The photo was part of a STAGED DEMONSTRATION during the OBAMA administration. Something they didn't bother to tell you, while attempting to blame it on President Trump. That's how the left works. Find something they can twist to make Trump look bad, and publish it, far and wide, without ever trying to find out of it is true. they just don't care. If it can be used to make Trump look bad, they publish it. I've seen this kind of thing before, but it was the Islamic terrorists who published pictures of dead children they killed, themselves, claiming American troops did it. I've gotten to the point where I disbelieve EVERYTHING I see in the liberal media until I see positive proof it is true. (Liberty Bugle)

Stupid Politicians?

Anti-gun laws never work. Anti-gun politicians have to know that. so why do they keep on insisting on making more and more of them? Whenever some fool decides to shoot up a place, especially a school, their "knee-jerk" response is to demand that more of their ineffective laws be made, while ignoring the fact that those laws make it easier for the bad guys to victimize the law-biding, who DO obey their silly, stupid laws. Why do they never learn from their mistakes? Are they STUPID, or what? No, I don't believe they're stupid. I believe they plan on coming for what is ours in the future, and don't want to run into a gun in the hand of the citizen they plan on robbing. That's the only explanation I can come up with to explain their evident stupidity. It's not stupidity, it's pre-planning. The only thing politicians do in DC is spend money. So, even if they aren't the crooked kind who want the money for themselves, they want it for the government, and the same thing applies. They don't want a gun in the hand of their victim. (North Jersey)

Swamp Protects Swamp

The Inspector General's Report is out, and it has proven one thing. That the swamp protects the swamp. Like Comey, they detailed the crimes, misdemeanors, and laws that were violated, and then said, "We found NO EVIDENCE of political bias, even though that evidence was plain to see in their report. They didn't even bother to say they found no evidence of a CRIME on the part of Comey, or anybody else. They told us the only thing they found was some violations of "protocol," mostly by people already fired. They made NO recommendations for firings, or criminal charges, even though they had LISTED them in their report. They "found no evidence" because they didn't LOOK for any. This report is one of the biggest WHITEWASHES I've ever seen. And I've seen many. Washington "insiders" will accept it, unchanged. That's how they protect themselves. They "investigate" themselves, and "find" no evidence of real wrongdoing on the part of swamp members. A similar report with a Republican, or Donald Trump himself as the subject, would have recommended CRIMINAL action. And they would move uncharacteristically fast to implement it. This is why "the swamp" has lasted so long. They're very good at covering their tracks. (Just common sense)

Liberals Really Hate Trump!

Why is that? Because he is systematically destroying the "Obama Legacy," one thing at a time, while creating his own "legacy" by doing the same thing Reagan did, but bigger, LOWERING taxes, while the Dumocrats "jump up and down," telling us they will RAISE our taxes--take more and more of our EARNINGS, if they manage to regain their lost majority in Congress. How that is supposed to get them elected, is beyond my comprehension. Trump promised to "drain the swamp," and that's just what he's doing. He has done more GOOD things in little over ONE YEAR than have ALL former presidents, in their entire terms. And that's with little or NO acknowledgment from the liberal media, help from Dumocrats, nor even Republicans, for the most part. Trump is a man who KEEPS his promises--unlike most politicians, who "promise you the world," but do NOTHING, once they get elected. They are MASTERS of "the stall" and "excuse-making." And that's what Dumocrats (and many Republicans) hate. They KNOW they're "the swamp," and that he will get to them soon--and that frightens them. So they want to undermine him before that happens. (Just common sense)

Proved It Again!

Chicago is the "demonstration city" for people who know that gun control doesn't work. Chicago has some of the toughest anti-gun laws in the nation. Meanwhile, Chicago has some of the highest deaths by gunfire in the nation. Something's wrong here. Gun crime SHOULD be minimal, or nonexistent in Chicago, if the anti-gun fools are to be believed. But, NO! With all those tough anti-gun laws, the numbers of gun deaths are still very high. Why is that? Does this mean that lawbreakers BREAK their anti-gun laws and get their guns illegally? It sure does. Chicago is a microcosm of big cities, everywhere. The law-abiding obey their laws, and become "sitting ducks" for the "bad guys" out there. Criminals IGNORE gun laws and continue to victimize the law-abiding. Gang members do likewise, and continue their war over "turf" all over the city, and they don't care who gets in the way of their badly-aimed gunshots. so they regularly kill and injure innocent people who DO obey those gun laws. Proof AGAIN that gun laws don't stop "gun violence." In fact, they make it WORSE by disarming the law-abiding, making them DEFENSELESS. The fact is, you don't defend yourself against a gun by DISARMING yourself. That's a fact, but one the anti-gun fools deny while making their man-killing anti-gun laws that violate the Constitution. (Oath Keepers)

It's Starting to Change

There are still many Republicans who hate Trump. But all that is slowly starting to change, as he goes about doing exactly what he said he'd do, if he got elected. The ones who aren't part of the swamp are beginning to realize the power he holds to get them re-elected, or "sent packing" if they voice their hatred of him and work against him. The recent victories of candidates who made no secret of their wish to HELP Trump "drain the swamp" are telling to many intelligent politicians. The fools among politicians will continue to hate him, and do everything they can to derail everything he's doing--until their time comes, and they lose an election they THOUGHT they had "in the bag," something that happened to Hillary, who is now just a "bitter old woman" still making excuses as to why she lost. What these people are learning, some the hard way, is that the American people eventually wake up, after they've been screwed too many times. And that's what's happening, now. Even some of them who proudly "pay no attention to politics" until just before an election, are "waking up." And that signals disaster for the Trump haters. (Just common sense)

Trump Jr. In Trouble

He had the audacity to post a picture of himself on Instagram, wearing a belt buckle that actually includes a real GUN! Horrors! That's jist orful! At least that's what liberals think. They want to eliminate ANY reference to guns from public knowledge. Like they didn't exist, at all. And to make it worse, it's the president's SON! Actually, I think he did it to MAKE the liberals' heads explode. He has to know that would "trigger" a liberal better than anything else--and all liberals NEED to be "triggered." Those fools still think eliminating legal guns will make "gun crime" go away. They're STUPID, that way. Nobody seems able to convince a liberal that the way to self defense is NOT to disarm yourself. In one place, they're trying to ban the USE of certain "gun words" like "gun grips," "scopes," and "sights." They think that will do something to stop "gun crime." That's how STUPID they are. Their next move, of course, will be to tell Jr. he must APOLOGIZE for that picture. Fat chance of THAT ever happening. (Guns)

What Happened to Gun Control?

Anti-gun fools point to England and Australia as "meccas of gun control." Both places have laws that have effectively BANNED guns in the hands of private citizens, with very few exceptions. This is supposed to STOP "gun crime," right? WRONG! In Australia recently, cops found 7 victims of gun crime and are fighting a rise in KNIFE crime. In London, a man is fighting for his life after a "machine gun attack." This is yet more proof that NONE of the anti-gun fools' laws do ANYTHING to "stop gun crime," as they claim. It merely makes the law-abiding into "easy targets" for the criminals and Islamic terrorists who IGNORE them. People DIE because of the STUPIDITY of the anti-gun fools, but they ignore that, and go right on demanding more and more of those USELESS laws. They are "tone deaf" to reason. We tell them and tell them that they are going in the wrong direction and they ignore us, continuing right along their futile path, while insulting those of us who TRY to introduce REASON into the "gun debate." (Breitbart)

Political Stupidity

The "Parkland Teens" are clamoring for the voting age to be lowered to 16. And some people are buying it, mostly Dumocrats. Because they LIKE having people too dumb about politics having votes. At the age of 16, you know NOTHING about anything, much less politics. You do everything you can at that age to get out of paying attention to politics. And they want you to VOTE? I know that I, at the age of 16, couldn't care less about politics and thus, knew less than nothing about it. I had not been ALIVE long enough to know anything, and they have not, either. Lowering the voting age to 16 is political STUPIDITY. Unless you're a Dumocrat. And then it guarantees you more votes because they don't know any better. Dumocrats have pushed many stupidities on us. Things like MEN in women's bathrooms; forcing bakeries to bake cakes for gay weddings, even if that goes against their basic religious beliefs, or face a ruinous lawsuit; and the same thing for refusing to bake one for a Muslim gathering for the same reason. There are too many stupid things Dumocrats stand for, for me to mention here, so I won't. But at 16 you don't KNOW they're stupid. (The Blaze)

"He Really Wants It"

President Trump is saying that Kim Jong Stupid really wants to "do the right thing," will do what he says he is going to do, and really dismantle his nuclear program. But we've heard this song before. N. Korea has promised many things before, INCLUDING de-nuclearization--but, under cover, has continued it's nuclear program. Past presidents have bought his father's bullcrap, and sent N. Korea a lot of money in return, only to find out later that they have done NOTHING to carry out their promises. Personally, I believe Trump doesn't believe for a second, that Kim will do what he says. But, in the interest of "peace," he will PRETEND to believe him--for a while, to force him to reveal himself for the world to see--and THEN move against them. I just don't think Trump is stupid enough to buy Kim's BS. We'll see. (Just common sense)

The CRIME of Gun Control

Anti-gun fools react instantly whenever somebody, with or without a legal gun, shoots somebody. Especially a mass shooting, and really especially if it occurs in a school. They bring put all their "knee-jerk" actions that DISARM the law-abiding, and make them "easy targets" for the bad guys. Like the guy in the linked video who was innocently using an ATM when a man walked up and killed him. He was not armed, because of the anti-gun fools who automatically want tho DISARM people when something like this happens. Did their laws protect him, or did they protect the guy who killed him? It is IMBECILIC to answer armed violence by disarming yourself. But imbeciles seem to be making a lot of our laws. Laws that get guys like this killed, How long are we going to allow this to happen before we "wise up" and tell those anti-gun fools to "go to hell" and arm ourselves so we can kill such as the guy who murdered this man? (Clash Daily)

Trump Tariff Retaliation

The "news" is full of "gloom and doom" over the threats of retaliatory tariffs by our "friends and foes." Which is typical in this "hate Trump" atmosphere. Anything Trump does, they paint the worst possible picture of the results. When he threatened Kim Jung Stupid with nuclear retaliation if Kim sent ONE missile our way, they whined and cried about Trump "starting a nuclear war," even though his threats were simply threats of RETALIATION if Kim started one. they whined and whimpered, right up to the time Kim "folded," and signaled that he wanted to talk. They never consider what will happen if Trump WINS, as he usually does. Frankly, I expect them to "fold" soon and reduce their own confiscatory tariffs, in response. When that happens, will his detractors shut up? Yes. About this issue, anyway. Will they admit their failure? Not a chance. They'll be on to the next Trump action they can paint as a "disaster." Until he wins. (Wall Street Journal)

Anything He Does

When Trump recognized that a small boy beside him was clamoring for his attention as he signed a bill into law, he turned and hugged him, making his day, and probably his life. The media excoriated him for it, saying he was a child abuser in disguise. Another thing that proves again that he can do no right, in the eyes of liberals, is him being criticized for commuting the sentence of an elderly woman who has been in prison for many years for doing a lot less than robbers, murderers, and other thugs do, and they get shorter sentences. It just doesn't matter what he does, the liberal media criticizes him. It really amazes me the criticism he received for LOWERING the taxes we all (including liberals) must pay, based on the theory that ALL MONEY belongs to the government, and a tax break is a bad thing. That's a DUMOCRAT principle. One they stand on stoutly. Nancy Peelosi is proudly saying they will INCREASE your taxes if the Dumocrats win back control of the Congress. I guess she's either senile, or just doesn't WANT the Dumocrats to win back control of the Congress. (Conservative Tribune)

Second Amendment A "Privilege?"

That's what the governor of Arkansas thinks. Seems like all the other provisions in the "Bill of Rights" are RIGHTS, but the Second is "just a privilege." He spouts that nonsense to excuse his trying to make unconstitutional laws that violate the Constitution. He says he "supports gun rights with reasonable limits." But ANY limits on the right of all Americans to own and use guns for self defense is an "abridgment," which is PROHIBITED by that Second Amendment, which IS a right. Anybody trying to say it is not is a LIAR and a fool. Anti-gun fools have, for years, tried to make the Second Amendment useless, without much success. Those willfully violating its provisions (or even ATTEMPTING to, should be arrested, tried, and imprisoned. That is one basic FLAW in the Constitution, that those lawmakers who willfully violate the Constitution are not subject to arrest and imprisonment for trying, or succeeding in getting laws passed that violate the Constitution. The only thing they suffer is the INDIGNITY of having their laws declared unconstitutional and reversed, after sometimes YEARS of them being enforced. And the effects of that enforcement last a long time after the law itself is declared unconstitutional. (Arkansas Online)

I Hate Conservatism!

I just don't like the term. Conservatism describes a specific set of principles and beliefs, some of which I do not accept, though I do accept, and agree with MOST of them. That is why I don't "label" myself as a conservative. I am a "rational individualist." I make my own decisions about everything. I don't allow anybody else to make decisions for me. Some of my beliefs are completely inimical to conservatism, and that's the way I like it. I conform to NO LABELS except my own. Nobody else, to my knowledge, describes themselves as a "rational individualist," and that's okay with me. The very term means that I make my own decisions about EVERYTHING, and brook no interference with that right. Liberals hate that. They insist that everybody conform to THEIR wishes and ideas. They want to have the power to DICTATE opinion and policy for everybody. I will NOT allow them to dictate my opinions and policies. I will do that, and if that sets me apart from everybody else, that's okay with me. That's what individualism is all about. I think EVERYBODY should think the same as I do, but as an individualist, unlike liberals, I will never insist upon it. That decision belongs to them, not me. (Just common sense)

Stormy Just Wants Money!

Ever since Stormy Daniels raised her head up from her HARD work in the porn industry and CLAIMED having a "one nighter" with Donald Trump years ago, I've been wondering what she's after. So she and Donald had sex (maybe). So the hell WHAT? Who cares? She SAYS Trump's lawyer forced her to sign a "non-disclosure agreement" and gave her $130,000.00. Of course, that "agreement" conveniently does not contain Trump's signature (even she admits that), so who knows whether or not it ever happened. Frankly, I think this whole thing is Stormy's wish to salvage her flagging "career" as a porn star and make a lot of money. She's certainly doing that with her "Make America Horny Again" tour and her new perfume she calls "Truth." I think that's the only thing truthful about this whole thing. I think the Dumocrats unearthed her and PAID her to make a lot of noise about a fictional tryst with Trump, long before he ever considered running for president. As to "releasing her from that agreement," she has violated it in every way possible, already, IF it does, indeed, exist. So far, nobody's ever seen it but her lawyer, if HE is to be believed.(Liberty Bugle)

Gun Grabbers Are Stupid!

They have to know that not a single law they've made has stopped a single instance of "gun violence," but they insist on making them, while only the law-abiding obey them. And the law-abiding usually aren't the ones that commit "gun crimes." Whenever some fool does something stupid with a gun, they jump up and down, demanding we make even more stupid, USELESS laws for criminals and other malcontents to ignore. While the law-abiding DO obey their laws and are routinely victimized by those who do not. Every once in a while, a mass shooter DID obey the law when he bought his guns. But he was not (yet) a member of the group that could not buy a gun at the time because he was as yet not a felon or other offender who cannot buy a gun. Like the shooter in Las Vegas. He was a rich man who had not (yet) committed a crime--until he opened fire on that concert, murdering many people, for what reason, nobody knows--or at least, they aren't talking about it. Stupid gun laws work two ways. Criminals ignore them, and potential mass shooters who have no record obey them, then go out and murder people. The anti-gun fools make even more USELESS laws for them to ignore, the next mass shooter gets his guns either legally or illegally, then kills a bunch of people, and the gun grabbers demand more useless laws. And so on.... (Arkansas Online)

Bernie Blasts Disney

The Disney Company has a lot to answer for, but one of them is NOT "making money." As with most socialists/communists, Bernie Sanders thinks outfits like Disney shouldn't make money. He thinks they can pay those confiscatory taxes he envisions WITHOUT making money. He doesn't think ANYBODY but the government should ever make any money. He doesn't think things through, and he doesn't understand economics, so he just doesn't understand how outfits like Disney could PAY those taxes without making money. Like most socialists, he hasn't a clue about economics. He just listens to the bulldung Karl Marx and the Dumocrats put out , and swallows it, hook, line, and sinker. And this man actually WON enough primaries that he should have been the Dumocrat nominee against Donald Trump, so Trump could win bigger than he did. What frightens me is that a fool like this was even CONSIDERED for the presidency. If he had won (doubtful), we'd be in "deep doo-doo." (The Blaze)

Gutter "Journalism"

We haven't seen much of Melania lately, while she recovers from her surgery. so now a Rolling Stone writer speculates, in print, that she "must be covering up Trump's abuse" by staying out of the limelight. It's a blatant example of the way the "Trump-hating" liberal media seizes upon ANYTHING they can think of to try and make Trump look bad. There is NOTHING to suggest that Trump is an abuser, but the liberal media wants to promote that idea. That they will be eventually proven wrong doesn't discourage them. They will run a TINY "correction" labeled as an "update," on page 106 (below the fold) in newspapers, or at 3 AM on TV, and go right on, as if their slander didn't happen. They just can't handle the fact that Trump WON the election, and is thus ENTITLED to be president. They think they can convince voters he "stole" the election and should be impeached, while he goes about getting rid of all the bad things, and useless people from previous administrations, while keeping his promise to "drain the swamp." It is that promise that makes them hate him with a previously unknown passion because they know most of them ARE "the swamp," and he will eventually get to them. He has done more in just one year to "make America great again" than previous presidents did in their entire terms. And they hate that. (Liberty Bugle)

Moving From California

Weatherby, Inc., a California gun maker, is moving out of California, to Wyoming. Apparently the gun laws in California have become just too much of a burden on them, and they're looking for place that is more "gun friendly" than California, which, apparently, likes illegal alien CRIMINALS more than the law-abiding people who are cursed by living there (I'm glad I no longer live there). The way their gun laws work, coupled with their "sanctuary state" policies, guarantee higher gun crime rates, by DISARMING the law-abiding, making it easier for CRIMINALS, who obey NO laws, to victimize those law-abiding people who do. I keep saying this, and I'm sure the anti-gun fools have seen it from time to time, here, and elsewhere, but they IGNORE good advice and keep making their USELESS laws and regulations, while the "bad guys" ignore them and continue to commit their gun crimes, unabated. They tell us their laws are "reducing crime," but the figures don't support that. They're fooling themselves, and getting people killed in their ignorance. (The Tribune)