Democrat Hypocrisy

Hypocrisy is a word used a lot in politics, and for good reason, There is a lot of hypocrisy in politics that politicians ignore. For instance: politicians (mostly Democrats, but some Republicans, too) hate and decry voter ID, but they LOVE "background checks and "carry permits" as a means of "gun control." They fight, tooth and nail to prevent any kind of "voter ID, claiming it "disenfranchises minorities," as if they couldn't come up with a few bucks for a state ID card or a driver's license. Then they go out and do everything they can to make getting a concealed carry permit as difficult as they can, and the most expensive. Tell me: what's the difference between "carry permits" and voter ID? The answer is, NO voter ID benefits the politicians, making it easier to steal elections. Letting people carry their own guns for self defense is just something some politicians hate, and think they can limit or get rid of, while many of them go around behind a WALL of ARMED "security" while denying citizens the same right, in spite of the constitutional guarantee. (Bullets First)

The New Terrorists

It appears we now have a new kind of terrorism: the losing party paying people to go out and riot, break windows, and do other kinds of damage. block traffic, and other things. How long before it gets to murder and mayhem? These people are INSANE! They thought they had an "inalienable right to rule," and were proven wrong by Trump's onslaught. Their prognosticators predicted at every turn, that Trump would fail, but somehow, he always succeeded, coming out ahead when they thought he was finished. They're still predicting failure, and they're still wrong. You'd think they'd learn from that. But that takes intelligence; something that's in short supply among liberals and Democrats. (Conservative Daily News)

Rising Gun Sales

We've had skyrocketing gun sales in recent years, mostly fueled by fears that liberals will enact more and tighter gun laws. But the gun sales that we should be worrying about are NOT those LEGAL gun sales. It is the ILLEGAL gun sales that take place in the back alleys of cities we need to worry about, because it is potential CRIMINALS buying them. And STEALING them. This rise is mostly fueled by the hundreds and hundreds of criminals Barack Obama has released from prison on various pretexts, plus the Islamic terrorists he has also released. Obama put THOUSANDS of illegal gun-wielders on the streets, many of them doing violent crimes to get money to buy dope. He CLAIMED that he was only releasing drug violators, but those drug violators commit crimes to feed their habits. Additionally, the Islamic terrorists he released go back to their terrorism in foreign countries, while many of them come right back here to do violence "in the name of Islam."

Obama seemed dedicated to INCREASING violent crime in this country. He will deny it, to his dying day. But it is true. There can be no other reason for releasing so MANY violent criminals of both kinds, all the time CLAIMING to be trying to REDUCE crime. Obama saw to the release of more criminals on the public than ANY previous president. He said he was "being compassionate" to those criminals--but what about "being compassionate" to their victims? As ILLEGAL gun sales rise, the anti-gun fools will not make a lot of noise about it, because there's really no way to chart those sales, so nobody will notice them--until more criminals victimize more citizens. Legal gun sales may mitigate that, to some degree, by "leveling the playing field" for those who have them. But the anti-gun fools spend every waking hour (and some even DREAM about it) trying to find ways to take away the right to self defense and to buy and use the means to that end, a gun.

Trump can't do much about those releases, because of the way the law is written, So you can look for crime rates to skyrocket, too--and it will be dutifully blamed on Trump, although it will be a result of OBAMA'S foolishness. But hopefully there will not be any more mass releases of criminals under Trump, and hopefully, the cops will keep an eye on those criminals he released, and put them back in prison where they belong when they commit new crimes, as they will--hopefully before they kill anybody--but I'm afraid that's a forlorn hope. Somebody needs to keep track of the number of those felons Obama released who commit new crimes--but I doubt anybody will--unless Trump sees to it. In any case, there is going to be a big increase in gun violence, fueled by Obama's actions. One can only hope those LEGAL guns can get rid of some of the ILLEGAL gun wielders so as to then REDUCE gun violence. (Yahoo)

Racism Against Whites

I guess that's okay, at least with Netflix. They have a new movie coming out. The title is, "Dear White People" and is a racist movie. Racist against white people, not backs. What if someone came out with a movie titled, "Dear Black People?" Liberals would lose their MINDS! And they'd be right. So why do they yawn when told about this movie? Racism against whites is "the new racism," and has the tacit APPROVAL of liberals. I've seen more angry black people recently than at any time in the past, and they accuse white people of racism, while demonstrating their OWN racism. White racism against blacks is at its lowest ebb ever, in this country.

There are more BLACK mayors and other politicians in the South today than EVER. We have even had our first black PRESIDENT! How would that even be POSSIBLE if this country were so racist? In the 50s, that would be unheard of. I remember being asked by a COP in the fifties which side I'd be on when the race war began. And he was a good friend of mine, and a decent fellow, as a rule. He didn't SEEM to be racist, except for that. Black against white racism has become "normal" in this country, today, and if we allow it to continue, we will LOSE our country. (Glenn Beck)

Now It's Trump's Pen

Obama famously (or infamously, depending on your outlook) said, "I have a pen, and I have a phone," and he used them to circumvent the Constitution of the United States in many ways, on many occasions, legal and illegal. One of the most sinister ways was to "gnaw away" at the constitutionally guaranteed right to be armed in self defense. Often by making the guns we DO have useless, and impossible to get into action fast enough when threatened by an ILLEGAL gun owner (criminal). Such things as gun locks, gun safes, and even some laws that allow guns to be carried, but require the guns to be UNLOADED. Other laws are made, making it illegal to bring guns into certain "gun-free zones," laws that are regularly disobeyed by criminals, not licensed gun carriers. Everything he did was designed to make it easier for ILLEGALLY armed criminals to victimize honest, law-abiding people. Now Trump has the pen, and the phone, and he has already started reversing Obama's ignorant executive orders on many things, INCLUDING gun control. More to come. (Ammoland)

Stupidity Reigns Supreme

They held a "campus carry task force" at Lone Star College in Houston, TX, and what did they recommend? That tired, old, mass shooter-drawing "gun-free zone" stupidity that has never worked to reduce or eliminate gun crime, instead, giving would-be shooters a "safe place" to go in and kill people. That's because people who obey the rules probably won't be armed and able to kill him before he can kill as many people as he would like. It has become OBVIOUS that gun free zones are stupid, but apparently the members of this "task force" aren't intelligent enough to perceive that. Maybe after a mass shooter comes into THEIR gun free zone and kills a few students and teachers, they'll wise up. Naaahhh....they won't. Anti-gun fools never do. So I guess the way to solve this problem is to get rid of the people who populate such "task forces." (Ammoland)

Getting Tough With Rioters

In at least one place, they are getting tough with Hillary's paid rioters who purposely damaged property and hurt people in their rampages, that were paid for by Hillary and the Democrat Party, most likely with money provided by that economic saboteur, George Soros. Some (almost all) have been indicted for FELONIES that can carry TEN YEARS in prison and a $25,000.00 fine. I bet they didn't plan on that When the Democrats hired them. They thought they would be just "taken away" and, once they got to a private area, given a "ticket," and released, as they did under Obama, to have their cases thrown out of court later, when nobody's looking. Now some of them are "going away" for a long time. This should be done everywhere Hillary's goons riot, which will undoubtedly END the practice. These people are CRIMINALS, and should be treated as such. (Just common sense)

Damned Fool Liberals

I'm getting really tired of their yammering. They're crying, screaming, lying on the floor kicking their feet over Trump whipping their butts in the election. They thought he couldn't possibly win that election, but he did, resoundingly They take comfort in him not winning the popular vote, but that's not how we elect presidents in this country. We have elected them through the electoral college since the very first, and they know that. But they just won't admit it, and I'm sick of their childish behavior. They're protesting the LEGAL way in which he won, like his winning was illegal. He has pledged to penalize those "sanctuary" cities for refusing to obey the law.

They have pledged to fight back, It isn't often a CRIMINAL pledges to fight the cops, and the mayors of these cities ARE criminals. You don't get to decide WHICH laws you will obey and not be punished. Their criminality is going to cost their cities millions of dollars, maybe BILLIONS. Which will cause suffering for many of their righteous citizens, to the benefit of interlopers--the illegal kind. Liberals seem always to choose the position that is at odds with normality, and try to MAKE their position "the norm." They'll find they cannot do that with Trump in the White House. And they'd better get used to it. They're making fools of themselves. But that's what they do best, other than stealing elections. (Just common sense)

Prosecute Constitution Abuse

Trump was elected president largely on the votes of those who wanted to retain their right to be armed in self defense. He promised to support the Second Amendment, and he could do that by instructing his new Attorney General to take legal action against states that pass laws and make regulations that infringe on people's rights under the Second Amendment. DOJ has prosecuted states in other cases involving violations of the constitution, and this would be right and proper. Washington, DC and Chicago, for instance, have made several laws that have been DECLARED unconstitutional, So they remake the law in almost identical fashion, and pass it, enforcing it until the next time it is declared unconstitutional, fining people big money, end even imprisoning some. This should cause those politicians involved to be subject to lawful indictment and prosecution. This can be done, and it would reassure potential gun owners that he meant what he said. (Second Amendment Foundation)

Uncontrolled Liberal Hacks

But they're wearing black robes and have lifetime appointments, so, under current law, they get to rule whichever way they want, not bothering to base their rulings on the law, or the Constitution, as they are DIRECTED to do. They get away with it, because nobody had the forethought to put "checks and balances" on them. There is NOBODY who can review their rulings and MAKE them cite the statute OR the constitutional provision upon which they base their rulings. One such judge, in the past, based his ruling on FOREIGN LAW, something which should have NO AFFECT on a ruling in a U. S. Court. That was a clear violation of his oath of office. Now a hack in a Washington federal court made a ruling, not on the law, but on his own bias that has put America's safety in doubt, and the hacks in the "Ninth Circus" Court backed him up, again without reference to the law or the Constitution.

There needs to be an "Inspector General" to oversee the courts, making sure their rulings conform to the Constitution and the statutes. They should not be allowed to "run wild" with their rulings, and even rule in OPPOSITION to the law or Constitution. In this recent case, the statutes are CLEAR. The president clearly has the statutory authority to limit who is allowed to enter this country if he feels they might be a danger, without interference by a hack on the court. That was ignored by both courts in their "rulings." Laws should be made to FORCE judges to cite the LAW or the CONSTITUTIONAL backing for their rulings, with an inspector general to keep track of it, who has the power to reverse their rulings if they don't, and to REMOVE them if they show a pattern of such rulings. And that should include the supreme Court, itself. They should not be allowed to be a law unto themselves with NO oversight. (Just common sense)

They Protest Too Much

I think the liberals (Democrats) "protest too much." Would there have been violent protests and riots in the streets if Hillary had won? Probably not. The "average American citizen doesn't react that way when their side loses. Besides, more of them have jobs and don't have the time. They just "button up" and take it, waiting for the next opportunity to change things. They realize that sometimes they win, and sometimes they lose. That's the difference between Democrats and other people. Democrats think they have the "divine right to rule," and ANYBODY who pushes them out of the positions of power had to have done it illegally. So they PAY people to demonstrate.They spend $BILLIONS to do it.

They get help from troublemakers like billionaire George Soros, who LOVES to cause trouble for others. He makes millions when it happens. The Democrats are particularly incensed this time, since they not only lost the presidency, they lost both houses in Congress, many governorships, and hundreds, maybe even thousands of legislative seats, all over the country. They have been relegated to (permanent?) "back bench status," and they HATE it. They don't think it's right, and they react violently. They're now a small "coastal party," and they know it, whether or not they admit it. They won't regain their status by what they're doing, but they're like a small child having a temper tantrum. Hopefully, like most tantrums, that will pass. But will it soon enough for them? (Just common sense)

It's Not About Religion!

Liberals like to scream that Trump wants to stop Muslims from entering the United States--period. That's a typical liberal twisting of everything he says, or does. It's not about religion, it's about a large group of Muslims threatening to kill Americans who won't "convert" to their phony "religion," and who are coming here by the thousands, claiming to be "refugees," but who are not. These "refugees" are mostly young, fighting age MEN, with very few women, children or old people. That's NOT using RELIGION as a ban. That's banning people who threaten us from infiltrating us and setting out to kill us. All Muslims are not terrorists. But ALMOST all terrorists today, are Muslims.

Making large groups of Muslims coming here in droves very suspicious. Additionally, even "peaceful Muslims" (so far) are a problem in America, because they insist on interfering in our business by filing suits to keep us from doing what is normal and natural for us, but not for them. You don't come to someone else's house, then demand they conform to YOUR rules. They keep trying to institute "Sharia Law" here. A system that goes against EVERYTHING American. They want to force OUR women to wear hijabs because women without them offends them. That's what they do, and Muslims all over are making trouble, which makes them undesirables. (The Guardian)

Showing Their Butts (Literally)

Democrats, apparently, aren't above showing their butts (literally) to oppose Trump. They are now planning a mass "mooning" in front of Trump Tower--as if that would change anything Trump does. He just laughs at their silly antics, as does the rest of the adult world. Democrats are becoming more and more hysterical as Trump goes about destroying many things they thought were sacrosanct, but were only sacrosanct to them. They pay good money for their thugs to go out and incite riots where people get hurt, property gets damaged, and nothing happens that they would like. Trump just goes right on destroying things liberals love most, but which the rest of the world hates. Maybe soon, they'll figure out that their antics aren't doing anything except making fools of them. But I'm not holding my breath. They're not that intelligent. And I don't like turning blue. (Just common sense)

"Ready, FIRE! ...Er, Aim!

That seems to be what at least one court in Pennsylvania is doing: firing before aiming. They used a "civil forfeiture act" to confiscate the gun used by a man to discourage another driver from tailgating him. The man did nothing but SHOW the gun to the tailgater. He pleaded guilty to disorderly conduct, and the judge refused to give his gun back, citing the "civil forfeiture act." I'm surprised they didn't keep his car, too. Only one problem. That is based on English "common law," that doesn't apply to anything in Pennsylvania, or the United states. In other words, the law the judge cited does not exist. This is a good example of a liberal judge making his own laws. Pennsylvania is largely a liberal-run state, and most of their judges are liberal, and thus are anti-gun fools, which is a basic thing in liberal land. (Philly Voice)

Crook Got A Surprise

He thought this 78-year-old man who came out every day to pick up his paper was going to be "easy pickings." He jumped out of his pickup and put a gun to the man's head and demanded his money. But while pulling out his wallet and giving it to him, he brought out his gun, which he was also in the habit of carrying when he picked up his paper, and blew him away. He jumped in his pickup and ran, but the cops later found him dead, and the man will get his wallet back. That's a result we need to see more of; a robbery victim blowing his robber away. That will ultimately reduce gun violence, as it cuts down on the number of criminals willing to take a chance on getting blown away by his intended victim, or just by reducing the number of live criminals, period. No charges are planned, although the Grand Jury will take a look at the killing, if any prosecutor is dumb enough to bring charges. (The Blaze)

Crybaby Democrats

They criticized Donald Trump when he hedged about accepting the results of the election--until they lost. Now they're going about whining and griping, screaming and kicking the floor from a supine position, and acting like BABIES because THEY can't accept the results of the election. They're hiring goons to start riots and incite Democrat dupes to help them. Those goons are burning things, damaging cars and other private property, and generally making asses of themselves, "protesting" the fact that Donald Trump won the election, fair and square, in spite of all their efforts at election fraud. They're putting as many roadblocks as they can in front of Trump, even if they cause Americans to be KILLED by allowing Muslim terrorists into the country without adequate vetting. The Republicans are getting tired of it, as witness their use of what liberals called an "arcane rule" almost NEVER used to tell Democrat Elizabeth Warren to "siddown and shut up!" She was violating Senate Rule 19 against impugning a fellow Member, something of which I'm sure she was aware--but she didn't care. If the Democrats don't "siddown and shut up" soon, they're going to cement their position as a "regional party" and not fit to field a presidential candidate in the future. (Just common sense)

Cops Support Gun Rights

A recent Pew Poll found that urban police officers favor the right of law-abiding citizens to carry guns for self protection, AND to help the cops in their jobs. Cops in smaller towns (about 17% of cops) were not included in the poll, so nobody knows how they feel on the issue. What the anti-gun fools do is talk to the police politicians to get the answers they want. They never talk to the rank and file, who might feel differently, since they are "in the trenches" and realize that there are ALREADY millions of guns on the streets, ILLEGALLY, and they can't be everywhere at once. Therefore, people should be equipped and ready to defend themselves until the cops can get there. The rank and file know the reality of the situation far more than the police politicians do, since they live in it, every day, while the police politicians live in their "ivory towers." Some of them USED to be "rank and file," but have forgotten the reality. (Bullets First)

"Crafty If Not Wise"

I have to say that "MOMS Against Guns" (or some such) are a crafty bunch. They think of all kinds of things to get noticed. That's necessary, when you have no real message, which they don't. They want one thing: to violate the Constitution of the United States of America, which states categorically that "the right of Americans to be armed shall not be abridged." And everything they try is an ABRIDGMENT of those rights. They have ONE GOAL in mind to destroy the Second Amendment to the Constitution. It's that simple. Many of their ideas are even unsavory--like their planned "pussy hats march," hoping to disrupt Trump's first days in office. But I believe he will ignore them, as all intelligent people do, no matter how "down and dirty" they get. Hmmmm....I wonder who put up the money for those 80 buses. Could it be George Soros? Or the Democrat Party? Or both? (The Hour)

They Don't Need Guns

As I've always said, those fools who want to kill a bunch of people don't need guns. If guns are unavailable to them, they will find a way. As this fool did in Australia, where guns are all but banned, entirely. He was involved in a stabbing, and then drove through a bunch of pedestrians, killing a few, and injuring many. One of his victims was a CHILD, killed in his wild melee. People say guns are at fault, but they aren't. They're just a TOOL "bad guys" use to kill people, and if they aren't available to them, they use knives, cars, trucks, and other instruments of death. Lack of guns does not bother them. Should we ban knives, cars, and trucks, since they have been used to kill people? That would be as stupid as banning guns, because THEY kill people. Without a "bad guy" holding it, a gun is no danger to anybody, nor is a car or a truck. (The Guardian)

"Senseless Death"

That's how the police chief in Decatur, GA (I assume, since they didn't say so in the news item). describes the death of a man who was killed by his wife as he attacked her in her home. I guess it's a good thing he doesn't get to define this death legally, or he'd put her away for a long stretch for defending herself against an out-of-control husband. To some anti gun fools, I guess, ANY use of a gun in self defense is a "senseless death." And it was. But not for her, for him. He didn't need to attack her, and she defended herself and her children. It was "senseless" for HIM to force her into this action, which caused her to kill the father of those children, which they will always remember. If the law barred her from owning a gun, the "senseless death" might have been hers. Which again proves my point that the best defense against an attacker is a gun in your hand. (WALB 10 News)