Thursday, April 21, 2016

Big Overhaul Needed

The election process for president is in need of a complete overhaul. It is far too complicated, and those very complications BEG for corruption and bribery, as well as the assurance that the “party bigwigs” retain control over who gets nominated. They don't want to leave it to the voters, under any circumstances. There are many aspects that need correcting, especially the “delegate” process, which allows each and every delegate to demand his own “tribute” before committing himself (at least, after the first vote). That means bribes are INVITED. I don't know if Ted Cruz bribed his way to the “victory” in Colorado, or not. I just know he “won” without a single voter (except for the politicians) having cast a vote. The entire state was disenfranchised. On the Democrat side, the “super delegates” cause whomever the party bigwigs want to win to get more delegates, no matter who wins the election. There needs to be a system set in place where the candidates (however many) are allowed to campaign as much as they want, but with no “delegates” awarded ever, until “election day,” when America will ALL vote at the same time, under the same rules—and not rules set in place for THIS election alone, so as to eliminate anybody specifically from contention. As far as I know, senators and representatives are elected that way, and that usually works out. If not, somebody please tell me. (Just common sense)

No comments: