Friday, May 23, 2014
Muslim Treatment of Women
In America, they talk a lot about “the inequality of women.” Even the White House pays women less, on average, than men in the same jobs. Of course, that ignores the fact that women go home to have babies a lot, but that’s another discussion. The whole point is that the same people totally IGNORE the treatment of women in Muslim-run countries. They’re so afraid they’re not man enough to keep their women, they force them to go around wearing what amounts to a TENT to make sure no other man will be able to “see their charms.” And they allow ANY man on the street to beat them if they show so much as an ankle. They do not allow them to go outside without being accompanied by a “male member of their family.” They engage in female genital mutilation, the kind of which I will not describe, here. If they have sex with ANYBODY, even by RAPE, they’re more likely to end up in prison or be executed than are the men involved. They need FOUR MALE WITNESSES to prove rape, in any case.
Do you know a rapist who would rape a woman in front of FOUR MALES? I sure don’t! In Saudi Arabia, they don’t even allow women to drive. I don’t know about other Muslim-run countries, but you still don’t see to many women in a tent driving a car there. In any case, the men involved usually go unpunished, or UNDER-punished compared to the women. What is needed to convince our pansy liberals that Muslims ABUSE their women as a matter of LAW and RELIGIOUS law. And to keep Muslims OUT of our country with the Sharia Law they bring, coupled with the fact that they “breed like rabbits” and soon will outnumber us in our own country; this in spite of hiding their women from the world, and especially other men. And then there’s marriage. They say they’re extremely tough about marriage.
But they allow a man to have many wives, and allow him to have as many “temporary marriages” as he wishes so he can pick up a whore, marry her for a night, then “divorce” her in the morning, simply by walking down the street in the morning saying, “I divorce thee” three times, which satisfies the “no sex with other than your wife” edict. Then there’s the “no suicide” and “no murder” edicts, which are easily gotten around by DEFINING people as apostates, who can be killed with no punishment. The no suicide edict is gotten around by defining their victims as “unbelievers,” which it is okay to kill under the Koran’s instructions. And woe be to you if you “willingly convert” to Islam, even under a death threat, then recant. That’s a death threat, too. It really amazes me that our pansy liberals can ignore all this and continue to call Muslims “good people,” whether or not that particular Muslim wants to kill us. It is said “If you VOTE FOR your own enslavement, there is no way to save you.” I can’t argue with that. (Just common sense)
Do you know a rapist who would rape a woman in front of FOUR MALES? I sure don’t! In Saudi Arabia, they don’t even allow women to drive. I don’t know about other Muslim-run countries, but you still don’t see to many women in a tent driving a car there. In any case, the men involved usually go unpunished, or UNDER-punished compared to the women. What is needed to convince our pansy liberals that Muslims ABUSE their women as a matter of LAW and RELIGIOUS law. And to keep Muslims OUT of our country with the Sharia Law they bring, coupled with the fact that they “breed like rabbits” and soon will outnumber us in our own country; this in spite of hiding their women from the world, and especially other men. And then there’s marriage. They say they’re extremely tough about marriage.
But they allow a man to have many wives, and allow him to have as many “temporary marriages” as he wishes so he can pick up a whore, marry her for a night, then “divorce” her in the morning, simply by walking down the street in the morning saying, “I divorce thee” three times, which satisfies the “no sex with other than your wife” edict. Then there’s the “no suicide” and “no murder” edicts, which are easily gotten around by DEFINING people as apostates, who can be killed with no punishment. The no suicide edict is gotten around by defining their victims as “unbelievers,” which it is okay to kill under the Koran’s instructions. And woe be to you if you “willingly convert” to Islam, even under a death threat, then recant. That’s a death threat, too. It really amazes me that our pansy liberals can ignore all this and continue to call Muslims “good people,” whether or not that particular Muslim wants to kill us. It is said “If you VOTE FOR your own enslavement, there is no way to save you.” I can’t argue with that. (Just common sense)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment