Chinese Rocket Intrudes

Many people in California saw an amazing sight in the night sky. The military tried to pass it off as a meteor “flaming out” as it descended through the night sky. But the truth they didn't want us to know finally came out. NO, it wasn't a meteor. And it wasn't a UFO. It was a Chinese-made rocket falling near to the California coast. What the hell was a Chinese made rocket doing near the California coast? And why did we not detect it when it was launched? (Or did we? And did we shoot it down, and they're not telling us?) We're really getting STUPID under Obama. Today's detection system couldn't detect a FART in the wilderness under Obama. He has so “drained” them of money they can't do anything. And it's not THEIR fault, it's Obama's fault. He thinks detecting the actions of other countries, especially those KNOWN to be America-haters, is just not important. And that attitude will be the death of us. (Conservative Tribune)

"Refugee" Rapes Woman

Isn't it interesting that since various countries started allowing “Syrian refugees” in, their rape numbers have taken a stiff rise? I'm not going to use that tired, old “alleged” dodge in this case, because the rapists in the increase are USUALLY “Syrian refugees” (or more accurately, Islamic terrorists from many countries PRETENDING to be "refugees") so I'm pretty sure he's guilty (she must have smiled at him on the street). But, in fact, he is NOT a “SYRIAN” refugee. He's from Iraq, and has fled this country after the rape. He went to Dubai, one of the countries where you need FOUR MALE witnesses to any rape for it to BE declared rape, and in any case, it will be the WOMAN who is punished. The rapist has been in the country since 2003, and was released on a personal recognizance bond in 2015 after being charged with several rapes, then. Apparently, he's a “serial rapist.” I'm not worried about him suing me, because if he shows up, he'll be immediately put in prison. More than 133,000 Iraqi “refugees” have come to the U. S. after the toppling of Saddam Hussein in 2003. He is one of them. So look for even more rapes. This rapist is accused of raping a GRADE SCHOOL GIRL again and again, over a six month period (He probably chained her to his bed, as Muslims do to their boy sex slaves It's a “cultural thing” with them). (World Net Daily)

The Big Gun Lie

There is no such thing as “gun violence, “anti-gun fools aside. There IS “criminal violence,” and “crazy man violence,” and “Islamic terrorist violence.” Sometimes guns are used (mostly gotten illegally), sometimes not. If the violence is done with a knife, do they call it “knife violence” and want to ban all knives? Not even. They just ignore it in favor of the next shooting. They whine about the high level of “gun violence” in Chicago, but never mention that Chicago has some of the tightest gun laws in the nation. So tight, in fact, some of them have been DECLARED unconstitutional by the Supreme Court. Not only that, they don't mention that MOST of the “criminal violence” is done by GANG members, in “turf wars.” And that NONE of their guns are gotten legally, so no amount of law-making is going to stop them from getting them. If they'd start concentrating on the HOLDER of the gun, and take steps to change what they do, putting them in prison longer for gun use, I might be standing right beside them. But, since I don't want to get shot, I'll stay away from them. (America's First Freedom)

How STUPID Is She?

Marilyn Mosby, the chief prosecutor in Baltimore, MD, “in her cop hatred, rushed to judgment” and charged six cops in the self-inflicted death of Freddy Gray, lost every case she prosecuted, and was forced to drop the charges in the others. She blames a “sloppy investigation” on the part of the cops for her failure, but the failure is HERS. She says they presented her a case without enough evidence to convict. Apparently, she didn't notice that there wasn't enough evidence to convict, and rushed ahead, anyway. That's not the cop's fault, it's HER FAULT. The fact is, Freddy, in an effort to incriminate the cops, banged his head against the wall of the “wagon,” forgetting he just recently had had back surgery. And not being fully recovered from that, the blows killed him. But she didn't know that, and didn't care. In her rush to hurt the cops, she filed charges. The mayor, also a cop hater, went right along with it. Now that Marilyn has been shown to be a fool, the mayor is now criticizing her, and she is facing many lawsuits, which “the people”: will have to “pony up” to pay for. I figure she'll lose her job over it, and maybe even be disbarred. And She richly deserves it. (Daily Caller)

You'd think They'd Learn

New concealed carry permits have reached an all-time high, while Obama and the other anti-gun fools are still working HARD to take our gun rights away. You'd think that would tell them something: that the majority of Americans will NEVER willingly give up their right to be armed for self-defense. Against the GOVERNMENT, if it comes to that. Gun sales are at all-time highs, too. But nothing gets through the thick skulls of the anti-gun fools—except a bullet in the head of Gabby Giffords, scrambling her brains, and convincing her she can eliminate all guns from the world. She can't, but she'll never learn that. Yes, she got shot by a gun. But it was held by a misguided fool. He shouldn't have even been free, as crazy as he was. But that's not her target. Her target is that “inanimate object” that can't hurt ANYBODY until picked up by a human being. (Washington Times)

Hillary Violates the Law

I guess the law means nothing to Hillary. Apparently she thinks laws are just for "the little people."On the FIRST DAY of the DNC, she violated federal law in the case of two illegal aliens. She violated a standing deportation order and sent a message to the millions of illegal aliens living in this country: “I think more of you than I do of American citizens, and will accomplish making you “legal” as soon as I become president.”What she doesn't acknowledge is the fact that she is never going to BE president. She's losing, even as she is winning. The only people to whom she is winning are the Democrats, who don't number enough to elect her president. There are going to be many more Republicans “coming out of the woodwork” in order to send her home “with her tail between her legs.” And from what I saw in the video the other day that showed her having a definite seizure, that's where she belongs, for a HEALTH reason. She's got way too many health problems to be put into a “pressure cooker” like the presidency. Add that to the many reasons she should NEVER be elected president. (Minuteman News)

How About "Gunphobia?"

There are several organizations who want to stifle dissent to their plans who have come up with phony names for their critics. A couple of note are “Homophobia,” and “Islamaphobia.” It is their hope to paint their critics as somehow “mentally deficient” if they criticize them. I expect a new one to be created soon: “transgenderphobia,” to describe people who object to men in women's restrooms and changing rooms. Okay, so why can't the people who want to defend themselves against ILLEGAL gun owners, all of whom are thugs and criminals (not the legal gun owners), have one of our own. Only this one is REAL. Anti-gun fools ARE “mentally deficient.” The only problem is that they have “wormed their way” into positions where they can make laws and rules to back up their mental aberration. The laws they make seem only to affect LEGAL gun owners, and ignore entirely the millions of ILLEGAL gun owners, who are really the problem. Gun registries only register legal guns. (iPatriot)

I Don't Understand

What the hell is there about Islam that makes such fools of so many American politicians, bureaucrats, and judges? Obama, for instance, has banned any reference, by his “minions” to Islamic terrorism. And he refuses to admit that Islamic terrorism, which is creating havoc in many countries, including Germany, which has suffered FOUR Muslim attacks in just one week, is a major threat, when it has become so obvious that it IS? Why whenever he is called upon to “rule” on a question that involves Muslims, he always “rules” in favor of the Muslims? Why is he appointing so many Muslims to his STAFF? And another thing. why are judges giving Muslims such huge “awards” in cases they shouldn't have won at all? One case comes to mind. where a bunch of Muslims hired on to deliver BEER, then refused to do so on religious basis. They KNEW they'd be delivering alcohol when they took the jobs. But when they got fired for refusing to do the job they hired on to do, they sued. And the ignorant judge gave them six-figure awards! Muslims are the easiest “offended” bunch in history. But politicians, bureaucrats—and businessmen always take their “being offended” seriously and “bend to their will.” Are we insane? Do we (not me) WANT to end up living under Sharia Law? I frankly don't understand this mindset. (Just common sense)

DNC Rigs Primaries

There has been released EVIDENCE, not opinion or innuendo, that the Democrat Party RIGGED the primaries to make sure Hillary won, in spite of Bernie winning almost ALL the elections (or whatever they called them). “The Democrat Party has been exposed as a bunch of corrupt, power hungry people who will do ANYTHING to stay in power.” Is anybody surprised? I've been saying that forever. Well, not forever, maybe, but as long as I've been blogging. The world already knew this, but now it is PROVED, beyond a shadow of a doubt. DNC Chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz has been forced to resign because of it. And I'd lay money on the fact that there will be more people in the DNC losing their jobs because of it. You can bet Bernie will be pushing it. He wants to be president, so HE can make this country into a “socialist Heaven,” and “go out with a bang.” The DNC has ALWAYS fitted that description. It's just that nobody's proved it before. (Conservative Tribune)

Teking the Mask Off

Nancy Peelosi has “taken the mask off” with her comment about Republicans only being Republicans because of “guns, gays, and God.” Which is about the stupidest statement even SHE could make. It puts on display the complete disdain for the middle class in the Democrat Party and especially with her. They have always BEEN the “racist party,” but have tried (in vain) to cover it up. Jim Crow, the SYMBOL of southern racism, was a Democrat. It was the Democrats Martin Luther King demonstrated against. Democrats FILIBUSTERED the Equal Rights Act, bur the Republicans passed it.. The top Democrats, down through history, have been known racists. At least one (that we know about) was a former top officer in the Klan! That's about as bad as it gets. And they try their best to paint the Republicans as racists. But it “ain't workin'.“ We're onto them. (The Blaze)

No Flags for DNC!

There have been NO FLAGS on the floor of the Democrat National Convention, until Rush Limbaugh and Donald Trump noted it. Then ONE small flag appeared. They called attention to THAT, and a few more will probably appear. That tells me a lot about the Democrat Party, and it's not good. It tells me they have no respect for America. And these people want to continue running things in America! If we let them, they will do irreparable damage (they've screwed up everything they touch, wherever they touch it). Damage from which we may not emerge intact. Maybe Trump isn't experienced as president, but neither is Hillary. With her, it has been proved. But Trump has the right inclinations, he's NOT a socialist, and he FIGHTS BACK when attacked. And I'm not talking just about hollering back when insulted. That same inclination applies to fighting Islamic terrorists—which is something we desperately need.(Daily Caller)

Let's Do It Again!

One of the most popular articles I wrote a few years ago covered the idea of making effective weapons of ANYTHING close at hand. This 86-year-old woman, when accosted by a younger woman in a grocery store, who obviously knew she had just taken her pension check out of the bank, grabbed the nearest....uh, pack of BACON and started hitting her with it. She kept hitting the girl until she wisely “ran for the hills” and was not seen, nor heard from, again. This is an excellent example of my contention that, in the absence of legally-owned guns for people like this woman, you can use ANYTHING that has enough weight to defend yourself in most attacks. If the robber has a gun, all bets are off, unless you have some skill in disarming an attacker. But guns aren't always used, and if he has anything else, grab the nearest heavy ash tray and brain him with it. You can obtain some half-inch ball bearings in a sporting goods store and throw them like rocks. Come to think of it, there are many ROCKS usually close by you can pick up and hold in reserve.

You can KILL with a rock if you throw it hard enough, and have good aim. Practice with a head-sized target.. If you're in a grocery store and are carrying a plastic bag full of groceries, hit him with THAT. and keep hitting him until he runs away or is unconscious. You can use a ball-point (or any other kind) pen to put out his eye. If he's trying to rob you, he's got it coming. Look around you. There are probably MANY good weapons within reach, right now, if you just LOOK at them properly. I've got a book page holder I bought in a bookstore that has lead lumps at both ends. It woulde make an ewxcellent sap to knock the hell out og an attacker, even if he has a gun. Just hit him on the wrist of the hand holding the gun. Then in the side of the head. He'll be DONE. Or you can put a bar of soap (or a roll of quarters, or anything else with a little heft) into a sock and it will serve the same purpose. (Liftable)

Mosby Admits Defeat

Baltimore State's Attorney Marilyn Mosby has dropped all the charges against the remaining police officers she falsely charged with murder in the Freddy Gray death. She blames the cops, of course, saying their investigation was “flawed,” and resulted in charges without sufficient evidence to gain a single conviction. She should have seen that when she rushed to file the charges even before the ink was dry on the police reports. She now says she still thinks they're guilty of murder, but she just can't prove it. Which stains them forever in many minds. Unfortunately, that description actually describes HER. She “rushed to judgment, in her anti-cop zeal, and, like most liberals, blames others for her own shortcomings. If she had gotten a single conviction of these innocent cops, who were only doing their duty, she would be in front of the microphones before the gavel dropped taking credit. Now, after a long period in which those cops lost time and money, and were forced to spend money to defend themselves, while “being on tenterhooks” about the rest of their lives, she “drops the ball” with no apology—as usual. Liberals never apologize when their stupid acts hurt people. (Mail News)

Blaming Pence

Moms Demands gun confiscation (or some such) blames Mike Pence., She calls Indiana a “feeder state” for gun sales and imports into Chicago, as if they didn't have enough illegal guns already there to kill a lot of people, with all their stupid gun laws. It's as if they couldn't get their guns from other sources. Mike can't control the flow of ILLEGAL gun sales any more than Illinois can. The difference is, he ADMITS it. Chicago and Illinois doesn't. They don't even LOOK for ways to stem the flow of ILLEGAL guns. They just want to disarm honest, law-abiding people and SAY they're “doing something about gun violence.” But they actually have NO IDEA how to “end gun violence,” but they won't admit that. They just spend people's money and make USELESS laws and CLAIM they're “doing something.” Gun-haters are FOOLS, and use ANYTHING to promote their “flights of fancy” that kill honest people by keeping them disarmed against the ILLEGAL guns in the hands of criminals and crazies. And now the Islamic terrorists Obama insists of importing by the hundreds of thousands.(Gun-Free Zone)

Gun-Hating Politicians

Why do we keep getting them? Why ARE they gun-haters? Why are so many politicians (mostly Democrats) afraid of ordinary citizens, who OBEY their laws, having the right (that is guaranteed them by the Constitution) to carry a gun to defend themselves against the CRIMINALS who get their guns ILLEGALLY and do all the “gun violence? Why do those politicians hate gun ownership for the “common man” so much? Honest, law-abiding gun owners do not, as a rule, commit crimes with their guns. What makes them think they can violate the Constitution and get away with it? They go out and make unconstitutional laws against guns they KNOW are unconstitutional, and enforce them UNTIL somebody coughs up enough money to get their evil laws into the Supreme Court, to be reversed, after much damage has already been done. Are they AFRAID of us? Somebody once said, “when the government fears US, we have freedom,” or some such. It seems so, to me. We need to stop electing candidates with an anti-gun history, completely, no matter how much we might approve of their other actions. (Just common sense)

Speaking Spanish

Hillary's chosen lackey, Tim Kaine, pulled the usual politician ploy of speaking Spanish to “curry favor” with the Spanish people in our country, legally or ILLEGALLY. But it wasn't so innocent as that, when you translate what he actually said, which he hoped nobody would bother to do. But we're smarter than the voters used to be. We know what he said. It was, “Welcome to our country. Because we're all Americans.” Which was “code” to mean Democrats welcome ALL Spanish-speaking people, whether they be legal or illegal. That, if they win. AMNESTY will follow. Trump will not promise that, so he probably won't get the ILLEGAL vote. He'll probably get the LEGAL Spanish-speaking vote, because they're mad that the illegals “took their place in line” and “elbowed them aside.” (Conservative Tribune)

"Guns Aren't Needed"

That's what Doughtery County Assistant district told a crowd at the Albany “Crime Stopper's' meeting that 51% of the guns in existence are in the United States and less than 10% of guns stolen are ever recovered. That's important to her, how? Notice all her figures are based on LEGAL guns, which means they don't count the ILLEGAL guns out there. She says that “Less guns means a safer world.” Which is entirely NOT true and shows her ignorancre.. It's what Attorney Cortney Elam thinks. Not for shooting sports, nor for self defense. She completely ignores the fact that the only guns that cause trouble are in the hands of ILLEGAL gun owners, who will not be affected by gun confiscation. Then how do we defend ourselves? How stupid is her opinion? I don't know what she bases her opinion on, but, like all anti-gun fools, she is WRONG. The ONLY real defense against all the illegal guns out there in the hands of criminals is MORE guns in the hands of honest, law-abiding people. But people like her will never hear about that, their minds are made up, so don't confuse them with facts. (Albany Herald)

Just Like We Figured

The anti-gun fools predicted much gun violence at the Republican National Convention because there was “open carry” in force in Illinois. They figured people coming in with openly carried guns on their hips would be a disaster and armed people got in spats with others over such trivial things as floor space and started shooting. But, as WE predicted, there was no problem at all concerning the “open carry” people The convention went off without a hitch and those with guns were “just there.” Nobody shot anybody for being jostled in the crowds.. The anti-gun fools were wrong again. As usual. But they'll never know about it, since they're among the “snowflakes” who cower at the very thought of opposition and retreat to their “safe spaces” to avoid any possible “negative thought.” (AmmoLand)

Florida NIghtclub Shot Up

What is it about nightclubs in Florida? There has been yet another mass shooting in a Florida nightclub. This time, in Ft. Myers. This time, the fool shooter only managed to kill two people. But 15 were injured. Now check this: it was “teen night” at this club, guaranteeing some teenagers would be hurt. Sick, right? Well. anybody who would shoot into a crowd of people is sick. The hospital says the victims ranged in age from 12 to 27. Now that is really sick! Some say, 12 to 17! This kind of thing is getting very tiresome, in that it has become “routine.” So routine, in fact, that this shooting didn't even get “all day coverage” on Fox News like Orlando did. Cops say they have detained two “suspects.” If shown to be guilty, they should revive the firing squads for such crimes, with orders to the shooters to aim for the stomach, so the perp will be “gut-shot” and will die a long, and painful death. They deserve it. (Daily Caller)

Proof Again I'm right

That gun laws, as we kn ow them today, don't work. The gun laws in Germany are very tight. Much tighter than any in the United States, making it SO easy for criminals and would-be mass killers to get their guns ILLEGALLY. It's a known fact that the tighter the gun laws, the easier it is to get guns ILLEGALLY. As this is written, the killer is still “on the loose” and able to continue killing innocent people. They think they have him “cornered,” but there's no confirmation of that. All of Germany is a “gun-free zone,” making Germany a Mecca for illegal gun-wielding fools. There is no word YET whether this is related to Islamic terrorism, but I'll go out on a limb here, and say, “Who else” hates people enough to do a mass shooting, today​?” I think we're going to learn that this IS Islamic terrorism connected. If I can accurately predict this, why can't those, “Oh, so smart politicians? If I'm wrong, I'll tell you, myself. (CNN)

Eight Times Larger

You can tell what a politician is thinking by watching what he DOES, not by listening to what he says. And Obama's actions are telling. He says he doesn't want to take away your guns, while his “gun control team” is EIGHT times larger than his “anti-terrorist” team. Which means he is more fearful of law-abiding gun owners than he is about crazy Islamic terrorists who have promised to kill us all and take over our country. And I don't think it is political myopathy. I think it is INTENTIONAL TREASON. He WANTS the Islamic terrorists to win, and set up their “caliphate,” possibly with HIM as the caliph (thus again showing his ignorance). Why the people around him don't see that is a mystery. Maybe they're blinded by political myopathy, I don't know. In any case, they are setting us up to be killed by making us DEFENSELESS against the Islamic terrorists, while REFUSING to effectively fight them. (Truthand Action)

Pandering to Gun-Haters

I don't know how many times Hillary has shown her gun-hating tendencies, but if you need one more reason to vote AGAINST her in the next election so she will NEVER become president, notice that she has asked the mother of that giant thug who tried to kill a cop in Ferguson, MO, Michael Brown and got himself killed, instead, to speak at the Democrat National Convention. That is such an obvious pander to the gun-haters, it doesn't even need to be said. I've said before that we need to stop electing politicians who show ANY tendency toward anti-gun bias, and that goes double for Hillary. If she is so against guns she asks this woman to speak at the convention, she's definitely not to be voted for, under any circumstances. That's even putting aside her tendencies toward socialism and "freebies for all,” with YOUR money. (Minuteman News)

Deluded Liberals

The Huffington Post has come out with an article saying that. “Open and concealed carry increase gun violence.” And they're right, to a degree, but not the way they think they are. As more and more honest, law-abiding citizens get guns to use in self-defense against all the ILLEGAL guns out there in the hands of criminals, who obey no laws, Gun violence will rise, for a time, while they “kill off” the criminals why try to victimize them. Then the “gun violence” will “drop like a stone,” since most of the troublemakers will be dead. Fools like those running the Huffington Post just don't understand that it is NOT the HONEST folks carrying guns that are the troublemakers. It is the CRIMINALS, who obey NO laws. Honest people owning guns aren't likely to be victimizing other honest people, while unlicensed CRIMINALS are. (Huffington Post)

Trucks & Pressure Cookers

Do we need to ban these important, and useful tools? If we follow the faulty reasoning of the anti-gun fools, we do. Whenever some fool kills somebody with an ILLEGAL gun, they immediately want to ban LEGAL guns. They can't be talking about banning ILLEGAL guns, because criminals don't obey laws. More people are killed with KNIVES than anything else. Should we ban all knives? No. That is a useful tool, too. Nor should we ban trucks or pressure cookers, because of the MISUSE of a few by fools. It's not the gun's fault, nor is it the fault of a pressure cooker that a couple of damned fools bombed some innocent people in Boston. Nor is it the fault of trucks because one was used to kill innocent people. If these people would get off their dead butts and THINK a little, they could figure this out for themselves. But they're not into thinking. They just look at something that might appeal to other fools and do it, thinking that they're “doing something” to stop gun violence, when they're not. All they're doing is DISARMING honest, law-abiding people and making it easier for criminals to use their ILLEGAL guns to kill them. (The News-Star)

Add It to Your List

If you're keeping a list of what liberals claim is “racism,” you can add to it, “mentioning big city names.” Every other day they come out with yet another thing that is supposed to be “code words” to mean racism—or something. They hate it that we've “tumbled” to the fact that most big cities that have financial and other problems are run by liberals, and can be depended upon to have even more troubles because the liberals who run them don't have any idea of what they're doing, but do it, anyway. And don't try and tell them they're screwing up the works. They're too arrogant to even entertain that idea. So it's GOT to be racism, you see. They figure they can blunt the criticism that way, without having to change their incompetent ways. They're taking a tip from Obama, who attributes each and every opposition to his policies to racism. (News Busters)

It's Just "Sour Grapes"

The fools who think we can get along without the cops are just expressing “sour grapes.” They want to be able to commit their crimes without being bothered by the cops, so they mount a campaign to make the cops irrelevant by making targets of them. That's what the “Black Lives Matter” movement is all about. Declaring war on the cops by painting every instance of a cop shooting a black man as “unprovoked violence” while encouraging criminals to shoot cops on sight. Like Mike Brown, in Ferguson, MO. They keep repeating the LIE that he “had his hands in the air” and was shouting “don't shoot.” But, in reality, this MONSTER of a thug was trying to take that cop's gun and kill him with it. These are things they don't tell you. They want you to think that all the black men who get killed by cops are “pure as the driven snow.” In reality, black men commit much more crime than do anyone else. Yes, some innocents do get in the crossfire. But that's what you get when you make cops nervous by making them conspicuous targets. They say they “shoot first and ask questions later?” Well, they do now, and that's the monster they have created. (Just common sense)

Why Was He Surprised?

It amazes me that a black activist has the GALL to walk up on a cop in his patrol car pointing something gun-looking in the dark (it was a cell phone camera) and is surprised when the cop points a gun at him. When every uniformed cop knows he has a target on his back, to point a gun at someone he does not know whether or not has a gun in his pocket and is accosting him? Cops are all “on edge” today, due to the idiots who think it is “open season” on cops. They might be shot by surprise at any moment, and this guy “challenges” this cop? This fool walks up to a cop at night with something in his hand asking silly questions? The fool is lucky he didn't get shot, and add to the phony stories about cops “shooting people for no reason.” Fools like this need to be locked up to save them from their own stupidity. Fools like this go about challenging cops and they wonder why they're quick to react violently. How stupid ARE they? (The Blaze)

They Know Not What They Do

People who say the Constitution is an “outdated document” and needs to be ignored are FOOLS, and shouldn't be listened to for even a minute, or a second (to quote a now infamous judge). The founders based that document on some basic truths that will never change. Things like smaller government, and “citizen congress members” who would serve one or two terms and then go home. Instead, some people love the power so much, they never leave. The Founders never envisioned people like ex Klan boss Robert Byrd, who was in Congress for most of his professional life, until he died. Now THERE was a PROFESSIONAL politician! Others similarly outstayed their welcome. One was 95 when he died in office. The rules they set down don't “go out of style.” It is the BASE, on which ALL of our laws sit. If a law doesn't conform to the Constitution, it cannot be a law—for long.; Liberals whine about it being a “confining document.” They're right. That's what it was DESIGNED to be. To “confine” overzealous politicians to basic laws, so they can't violate anybody's NATURAL rights. The liberals want to do that, so naturally, they want to do away with it, or convince people it isn't relevant, any more. Don't let them do that. (Just common sense)

Feeding Frenzy

The liberal media spent 130 minutes trying to pillory Melania Trump for “plagiarizing” part of her speech, taking phrasing from Michelle Obama's speech at the 2008 DNC. What she didn't know is that speech might have been taken from an earlier speech by somebody else. These days, it's hard NOT to take words from other speeches. Especially since politicians say many of the same things naturally. Couple that with her speech writer coming out and taking responsibility and you have a “tempest in a teapot” that tells us they have nothing else. Since this controversy began, people have uncovered many instances of the same thing in speeches by many others, including Barack Obama. It's funny they would make such a big thing of something most of THEM have been guilty of when it's so easy to dismiss in this day and age with Internet coverage being so easy. (News Busters)

"Rebranding" Gun Control

Gabby Giffords and her husband, the loudest anti-gun fools in the country (outside of Sen. Feinstein and “MOMS”), are dissatisfied with the “gun control” effort. So they're going to rename it. They call that “rebranding” it. This is what politicians do when they find their plans being stiffly opposed. They just rename it so for a time, they can “travel under our radar.” They're frustrated that so many “gun control measures” have been defeated handily in the Congress. They just don't understand WHY there is such stiff opposition. That a MAJORITY of the citizens of this country VALUE their right to be armed for self-defense, and they will not give up that constitutional right easily. Barack Obama, their best-known “partner” in their efforts to take away our right to self-defense has SAID that he is “disappointed that America has so often rejected his gun control efforts.” He too, just can't seem to understand that his efforts to take away our guns is “not who we are.” And we will “go down to the wire” to defeat all efforts. (Politico)

Imminent Danger

This is the most important election in the history of this country, as we know it. If Hillary Clinton is elected president, this nation is LOST, as a free nation. For starters, she will appoint a liberal to replace the conservative Justice Alioto,  who died under suspicious circumstances and that will, by itself, move the Court in a leftward direction for the next several decades. All their future decisions will be seen through the lens of the majority, which will be liberal. And they will favor socialism, and all the other damned fool things the liberals are in favor of. Then she will go on to appoint liberals and socialists to all the other positions that come up during her administration. And they will remain, even after she “moves on.” And she will get to appoint the other Justices to replace several who have signaled that they are ready to retire, which will further CRIPPLE the Supreme Court in upholding the Constitution, which the liberals want GONE. And they will stay long after she's gone. They keep saying Trump is “dangerous.” And they're right. He IS “dangerous. But only to THEM, and their routine usurpation of power. They're insanely frightened of him. I haven't seen such fervent opposition, ever. (John Bolton PAC)

"Ban Umbrellas!"

Two million people die in accidents involving umbrellas. Only 365K in gun incidents. Using the logic displayed by the anti-gun fools, we need to BAN UMBRELLAS! Whenever a gun is involved in violence, they immediately start screaming about “getting rid of guns,” ignoring the fact that a gun, without a HUMAN aiming and firing it, doesn't usually harm ANYBODY. Often, umbrellas don't need a human being to kill. Another killer instrument is the automobile. There are so many people killed by automobiles, it's a wonder to me they haven't banned them a long time ago. It's the same with knives. Whenever some guy who wants to kill somebody can't get a gun, he uses a knife. Why haven't they been banned? I'm aware you know this is a parody. But the anti-gun fools don't. THEY are the biggest parody out there, with all their fool notions, like “no-gun zones,” “gun locks,” “safe storage of guns,” allowing concealed carry, but only with UNLOADED guns (one of the single STUPIDEST measures I've ever heard of). (Fox News)

"NRA's Twisted Vision"

That's what the Brady Campaign Against Gun Violence calls the NRA drive to retain our Second Amendment rights, which they're trying HARD to take away. They call it a “twisted vision,” in hopes of diminishing it in people's eyes, which is all they've got. Actually, they're the ones with a “twisted vision.”The “laws” they get passed don't work. Instead of REDUCING “gun violence,” they INCREASE it. But they'll never admit it, because that will mean the blood of those killed is on their hands. They can't find a real way to make a law against gun ownership that will keep guns out of the hands of criminals, who don't OBEY laws (neither can I). But they keep trying, making the same old laws that don't work, thinking they're “doing something” when they're not. Maybe some day they'll wake up. But I don't think so. They've proven themselves to be not smart enough. They con people into creating “gun-free zones,” which actually operate as an “engraved invitation” to “bad guys” to “come in and shoot us,” since there probably won't be any guns there to oppose you. (Breitbart)

Trump Nominated

You can retire the word, “presumptive” in referring to Donald Trump's nomination to be the Republican candidate for president in the national election. He needed 1237 votes, and he got more than 500 more! He got more than 1,600 votes! A LOT more than he needed. In other words, he beat them “handily,” as usual. This guy the “wise men” told us would never make it through the primaries not only DID it, he did it “in style,” getting more votes than any candidate in history. They've been wrong, all along, and they'll be wrong again when he doesn't lose to Hillary in November. When he “beats her like a drum,” they won't ADMIT that they're wrong. They'll go on to make another silly prediction about him. And the New York state delegation, one of the most liberal in the nation, is the one that “put him over the top,” as announced by his SON, who, I'm sure will be instrumental in his administration. They're still predicting that he can't beat Hillary. On what damned fool logic they base that, I don't know. What I DO know is they will be wrong, again. Below is the CNN announcement. I'm sure they were gnashing their teeth even as they wrote it. (CNN)

Nobody Showed Up

They called an anti-gun demonstration and nobody showed up. Okay. I'm wrong, FOUR people showed up. A “clear majority” of people who hate guns, of course (hee, hee). It's the same with “Moms Against guns(or something like that)”. They can't seem to get nearly as many people to their demonstrations as they used to. Poor babies! Moms called for a “massive showing” and reserved a large space for all the people they expected. They even told people they'd have to register in advance for a planned showing of Katie Couric's selectively edited anti-gun “documentary” due to “lack of space.” Then ONE person showed up, and that one was an “anti-Trumper.” It must be supremely frustrating for Shannon Watts, “leader” of “Moms.” That she can't get people to demonstrate for her silly ideas. The local paper (The courier-Journal) even gave her space for free advertising, in the form of a timely op-ed, and even wrote supporting articles, themselves. It didn't work. That's what happens when you're working against the will of the people. (KAKE/CBS)

Violence Creeping Closer

Liberals just don't understand Americans wanting to be able to defend themselves against the known violence that is creeping closer. Criminals are growing more violent as the “killing cops” movement grows larger. Add to that, the fact that Obama is importing hundreds of thousands of Islamic terrorists who have pledged to KILL us if we don't “knuckle under” and convert to their phony “religion,” plus he is releasing as many violent felons as he can, on specious grounds, and they KNOW that gun violence is going to increase, and they want to be ready to “ward it off.” The “Black Lives Matter” fools think ONLY black lives matter. They're okay with killing innocent cops, just because they're wearing that uniform with a badge (target) on their chests. Obama hopes all this will create enough new violence that he'll get to make more laws and regulations to hamstring legal gun carriers so his minions will not meet as many guns when they come to take what's ours. And the “useful idiots” who are “anti-gun” play right into his hands. (Alaska Dispatch News)

Stupid Politicians

Oregon Governor Kate Brown, who was appointed, not even elected, has declared gun owners to be “terrorists.” How short-sighted and stupid is that? Never mind that the gun owners she's talking about are LEGAL gun owners, who obeyed the law, while the ones causing all the trouble are the ones ILLEGALLY owning their guns and are not affected. How do people who are so stupid manage to get into positions of power? Gun owners are not “terrorists.” TERRORISTS are terrorists, while gun owners merely defend themselves FROM terrorists and other criminals. Politicians like this governor only illustrate their stupidity by such statements. They're still blaming the GUN, rather than the gunner, but they, in their stupidity, think they are “doing something” about gun violence, while what they ARE doing is adding to it. By making it harder to LEGALLY own a gun, they're making it easier for ILLEGAL gun owners to victimize people. (OPB FM)

"Truck-Free Zones"

We need new laws top keep trucks out of the hands of Islamic terrorists, and other criminals! The massacre in Nice, France, didn't involve much use of guns, except for the cops killing the truck driver who killed 84 (so far) people by “mowing them down” like wheat. So, going along with the current thinking, we need to keep trucks out of the hands of “bad guys.” It's all the truck's fault, just as all the other mass killings are the gun's fault, not the fault of the fool who used it to kill people. We need to specify places where trucks cannot go, register truck buyers so we will know who owns trucks, and a truck ignition lock beyond the usual ignition key. We need a way to delay would-be truck drivers so they can't just get in and drive over people. We need a “safe storage” law for trucks, so nobody will be able to accidentally drive one over a bunch of people. That's the same “reasoning” that's behind all the anti-gun laws now in existence, or being made. (GRAA America)

"This Is WAR!"

That's what the French say, after a man took a large truck and ran it through a huge “Bastille Day” crowd in Nice. It's time SOMEBODY admitted this, and France cannot suffer many more massacres before they snap. They are a small country, with a large Muslim population. The larger the Muslim population, the more places there are for the Islamic terrorists to hide. It is their ability to hide in large groups that is one of their biggest strengths. We need to remove that strength. We need to stop treating their atrocities as “crimes” and treat them as what they are: "acts of war,” and kill them where they stand. No trials, no imprisonment, where fools like Obama can find some excuse to release them to go back to their killing ways. Islamic terrorism alone should be deemed an act of war, with a summary death sentence attached. If they're “caught in the act,” they should be killed on the spot, with prejudice. The best method of stopping them is to kill each one we find, immediately. We need to bypass Obama, who will never do it. (New York Post)

Go On to New Zealand

That's my advice to Justice Ginsberg, who uncharacteristically revealed her bias the other day in the New York Times. First of all, she “promised” to move to New Zealand if Donald Trump was elected. Then she revealed her unalterable opposition to the Second Amendment and her intention to vote AGAINST any measure regarding it that came before the court, including the “Heller” decision. This, from one of EIGHT Justices whose word is LAW. Justices who SHOULD know what the Constitution says, and UPHOLD it. Way too many judges rule AGAINST what the Constitution says, instead of doing their jobs and upholding it. Any judge or Justice that rules demonstrably against the Constitution should be summarily removed, with prejudice. They have ONE JOB, and that is to UPHOLD the Constitution. If they don't do that, what are they worth? (Truth About Guns)

Reducing Violent Crime

Did you know that 76% of police chiefs admit armed citizens reduce violent crime? There are more intelligent police chiefs than there are political hacks in that job. They KNOW they can't be everywhere at once, and it takes from minutes to HOURS (in some places) for them to get there with their guns. A criminal, armed ILLEGALLY with a gun, can do a lot of damage in the few minutes it takes them to arrive. They usually get there just in time to clean up the scene, dispose of the body or bodies, and document it. Which doesn't help the victims very much. The cops are a necessary ingredient to our safety, but not usually in instant response. They can usually apprehend the “bad guy” AFTER the crime has been committed, and prevent (maybe) some repeat crimes. But without them, we would be lost, unless all of us want to live in an “armed camp” and be ready to “repel all comers” ourselves. You can be sure that if there were no cops, that is how we'd have to live. (Media Research)

The War Against Cops

It's a wonder any cop goes out on the streets wearing his obvious uniform with a convenient “target” on his chest, driving their distinctive cars that are well marked, and offer no protection from insane criminals, who think they should not exist, so they can commit their crimes unobstructed. People are mad in Baton rouge, Louisiana, because it looks like cops wrongly killed a man who SUPPOSEDLY had a gun. Which may be true, but is an isolated incident, and should not bring such a drastic response. So they went out and MURDERED 3 cops (so far), and wounded four more. Which is the SECOND such ambush of cops in ONE WEEK. Obama supports this action. His words confirm it, although he vehemently denies it in the face of sure evidence it is true. The blood of these cops is on his hands. Cops will now be “on edge,” and quick to shoot. Something their detractors claim they were doing before, but they weren't. (News 9)

Things They Never Tell You

The anti-gun fools talk about black men being “five times more likely to be shot by cops,” but what they don't mention is that cops are five times more likely to be shot by black men. They complain that many more black men are in prison than white men, but fail to mention that more black men commit crimes than do white men. They can't tell the truth and sell their crap, so they just IGNORE factors that don't advance their agenda. I get very tired of saying these things over and over again, but, for the most part, they fall on deaf ears in the anti-gun fool community. So I have to repeat them over and over to be heard by anyone. The whole idea that the way to self defense is to DISARM yourselves is absurd. But that's the imbecility they're selling. How do they sell such damned foolishness? Simple: by LYING about everything. And they lie very well. (Just common sense)

Not On CNN!

Don Lemon, on CNN has listed 11 mass shootings that happened on Obama's watch. They didn't mention this, but ALL happened in “gun-free zones,” thus proving, again, that what I say over and over is true. “Gun-free zones” are an open INVITATION to wannabe mass shooters with the assurance that there will most likely be no guns there to oppose them while they kill randomly. One time, a former mass shooter was asked about it, and he told the questioner that he LOOKED FOR “no-gun zones” in which to do his killing. He rejected other places where there were lots of cops and other armed people. Gun shows, especially. There has never been a successful mass shooting at a gun show. And if I have to tell you why, you're lost. If you're reading this, I don't think you are. (Breitbart)

Why Do They Hate Us?

That's what liberals all over are asking. They're trying very hard to figure out why the Muslims hate us so. I'd feel sorry for them if the Muslims had not told us, many times, exactly why they want to kill us. It's really very simple. Their RELIGION tells them to convert of kill” everybody they come in contact with. Islam is the only “religion” that tells it's followers to KILL those who won't convert to their “religion.” Liberals are “tone deaf” to that, as they are to many simple things. Liberals have this big problem. They're UNABLE to see a solution to a problem that doesn't involve their taking more control over the rest of us. In this case, the problem is CREATED by a bunch of insane Muslims who simply want to kill us for not believing the way they think we ought to believe. (iPatriot)

It's a Fact!

But one ignored and denied by the anti-gun fools who want to DISARM Americans. Firearms purchases skyrocket, while gun violence plummets. Figures prove it, but anti-gun fools deny it, in their quest to make us defenseless in the face of the thugs who come at us with their ILLEGAL guns. Guns they've bought in a back alley somewhere, or just stolen. These fools think all you have to do is make a law, and criminals, who break laws for a living, will somehow OBEY this one. In just one city (among many), they're proved wrong, and they deny that, too. Chicago has some of the tightest gun laws in the nation, and at the same time, the highest number of gun deaths in the nation, as well. They don't know how to answer that, so they immediately start calling us names if we bring it up. “Gun lover!” “NRA member!” As if that were a bad thing. (Breitbart)

Okay to Rape

That's what a liberal judge in Germany told the Muslim immigrants (terrorists) when he turned two sexual assault perpetrators loose with just probation after they sexually assaulted and humiliated several young girls on the street. The girls must have smiled in their direction, because they see a smile as an INVITATION to sex. Muslims (even the “peaceful” ones) see ANY woman not wearing a Burka (the Muslim woman's mobile tent) as a willing sexual object for any man who wishes to rape them. Theirs is a “rape culture.” They're so afraid someone will SEE their own women and want them, they force them to walk around covered by what can best be described as a tent, always accompanied by a male member of her family. If she has none, she's out of luck, I guess. Meanwhile, they go out and rape other people's women—and BOYS. It's a “cultural thing” to rape little boys for them, and chain them to a bed to “save” for future rapes, sometimes making the boy's mothers watch. That's because Sharia Law requires FOUR witnesses to establish rape, and they must be MEN. No wonder Muslim MEN are determined to establish Sharia Law in America. (BB4SP)

Increasing Violent Crime

Seems like Obama is doing everything he can to increase violent crime. First off, he is trying to disarm all law-abiding people. Next, he's importing Islamic terrorists by the hundreds of thousands. People who have sworn to kill us because we don't conform to their idea of a religion. He's being told that's a dangerous thing to do, but he refuses to listen. On top of which, he gets rid of government employees who disagree with him. And then he sets about releasing as many felons as he can, many of them violent felons, from prison. If this doesn't scare the hell out of you, you're dreaming. And so is he, if he doesn't see the danger he's putting all Americans in by his actions. I think he does, and it's part of his plan. Any other president who had done the things he has done would have been long since impeached, convicted by the Senate, and removed from office. Forcibly, if necessary. Then be indicted for inciting to murder, and after conviction, sent up for a long prison term, or maybe executed. (Just common sense)

Gun-Grabbers Enraged

They had a massacre in France, and didn't use a single gun (except the cops). The killer used a truck. He drove into a crowd of people and “mowed them down” like cutting down wheat, until the cops lined up in front of his truck and filled him full of holes. The only guns used here were used to stop the massacre. 84 people died, including some children. Is it Muslim terror? The French think so, and they're probably right. Only time will tell. But the gun-grabbers won't be able to use this one to promote their agenda to disarm all law-abiding citizens. Still. I wouldn't be surprised if they do. They might object to the number of bullet holes in the windshield of that truck, complaining that the killer didn't get the benefit of arrest and trial, even though he denied it to those he “mowed down.” Oops! He DID use a gun, but it only did minimal damage. It was way down in the CBS story, but that was based on French news output. But I'm sure it will be played up mightily in other American news reports, even though the most deaths were from being run over by the truck. Obama condemned the massacre, saying it was a “horrific terrorist attack.” Still missing was the word “Islamic,” even though we know who is in the “killing business.” It's instructive that the killer's first name is Mohammed. (CBS)

Unsung Hero Cops

We don't hear much about this kind of thing. It happens often, but is not reported.  We DO hear a lot about “abuses” of a few cops that are blown right out of proportion to support an agenda to CRIPPLE policing in this country. What I'm talking about is that at least five cops in Dallas “rallied around” this black woman who had already been shot, to keep her from being killed while she tried to protect her son. This while they, themselves were under fire from a military trained shooter that was proving impossible to “root out.” This was a microcosm of what cops do every day, that is not heralded, and should be. There should be many more stories of their daily heroism to counter the DIN of stories about the FEW instances of abuse, mostly false. Personally, I'm getting very tired of hearing about the exceptions, pretending they are the rule. The cops are a “thin blue line” between us and chaos. Without them, this would be a “war zone.” And with Obama doing his best to DISARM us, it will only get worse. (VEOOZ)

Open Corruption

Politicians making speeches for big money to the very people they do, or will regulate if elected should be disallowed. The worst example of it recently is Hillary making fifteen minute speeches to the very bankers and financiers she hopes to regulate as president for fees upwards of a half million dollars each. That's such an obvious bribe, it shouldn't even need to be mentioned. But politicians “turn a blind eye” to it because they all take their bribes that way. Hillary has moved bribe taking to a new level, but politicians hesitate to do anything about it for fear of eliminating it for themselves. Another disguised bribe is a politician who has a foundation that these same people “contribute” to. With Hillary, many foreign governments (who can't directly contribute to an American politician) can bribe them INDIRECTLY. It's instructive to note that Trump has no such foundations, and does not make such lucrative speeches. (Just common sense)

How Can They Tell?

They say Kenya has the highest number of guns in the hands of private citizens in Africa, and rising gun attacks. Really? How can they tell? Their figures only reflect the number of LEGAL guns in civilian hands, which, if this country is an example, is only a small number of the guns in civilian hands. That's the problem with the anti-gun fools all over the world. Their figures only reflect LEGAL gun ownership, and ignore ILLEGAL gun ownership. That way they can DISARM honest people and give criminals free rein to victimize them. And sometimes the criminals are wearing badges. Damn, I get tired of pointing this out, while only INTELLIGENT people are listening. Apparently, that does not include the anti-gun fools who make their “common sense gun laws.” They just keep right on making their USELESS gun laws that do nothing except leave honest people defenseless against the ILLEGAL guns wielded by criminals and other “bad guys.” (GunMart)

"No Guns for Blacks"

That's what our erstwhile black president, Barack Obama says. He says the reason that innocent man in Minnesota was killed by a frightened cop is because it's so easy for blacks to get guns (This from a black man who has us pay for the guns carried by Secret Service agents who protect HIM). As if that were the problem. The problem REALLY is, there are too many criminals selling illegal, untraceable guns out of the trunks of their cars. They rarely get them legally, and so escape their “common sense gun laws.” That's where criminals get the guns they use to victimize honest, law-abiding people. The “laws” they make only seem to apply to LEGAL gun owners, not those criminals who are the best customers for those selling ILLEGAL guns. If they want to do something abut the “easy ability to get guns,” maybe they ought to concentrate on that, instead of hindering the ability of honest people to defend themselves. That cop saw that gun, even though he had already been advised of it's existence, as well as the legality of that man carrying it. It gets pretty bad when the mere SIGHT of a gun causes a cop to kill somebody. This only feeds the crap the “Black Lives Matter” crowd is putting out. It's an isolated incident, but they will make the most of it. (Zero Hedge)

What's Dangerous About Trump?

The “Never Trumpers” keep saying, “Trump is dangerous” while never detailing WHY Trump is dangerous, because they can't. When asked, they give us generalities, but no specifics. Meanwhile, they're praising two SOCIALISTS, one of whom is a proven CRIMINAL, whose only promise is to give away YOUR property to those who don't deserve it. I should be saying, “I don't understand why people who have benefited from the free market (disparagingly called “capitalism” by liberals) hate it. And they push a system that has universally FAILED everywhere it has been tried (Notably the Soviet Union and Venezuela, currently). The only socialist systems that still survive are the ones that still have money and property LEFT after STEALING it from those who produced it. The dangerous ones in this election are those two socialists. And I CAN detail why. Why is because they propose to PUNISH achievement while stealing the profits of that achievement for the benefit of those who produce NOTHING. Bernie is an ADMITTED socialist, and Hillary DENIES it while proposing socialist measures. And they say Trump is dangerous, since he promises to take away SOME of those unearned perks. (Just common sense)

On the Wrong Foot

The left got its shoe on the wrong foot the other day. They’ve taken some of the billions given them by political pimp George Soros and used it to knock a charitable contribution by the Koch Brothers to the United Negro College fund and turned it from a “helping hand” into a “give away” to “capture them.” They ought to know—that’s the system they use the world over. Just as Harry Reid whines about the Koch Brothers while ignoring the billions of dollars spread around by George Soros, who has ruined FIVE economies (so far) with his machinations. The absolute absurdity of them whining about this is funny if it weren’t so stupid. They’re in a positive RAGE about this. And they accuse US of racism! (Daily Caller)

Living In A Dream World

Gun-grabbers think if they can just “get rid of all the guns,” the world would be a safer place, and they could eliminate “gun crime.” In the first place, there is NO WAY they will EVER “get rid of all guns.” There will ALWAYS be guns in the hands of CRIMINALS, who don't obey laws or “rules.” So even if they “confiscated” (stole) all legal guns, there would still be plenty of guns left, all in the hands of the very criminals who DO the “gun crime.” They think ALL guns should be in the hands of cops and government agents, and that will be a utopia. What it would BE is a DICTATORSHIP, where the guys who HAVE the guns give orders to the ones who don't, and the ones who don't have no way of objecting. Meanwhile the criminals (along with the ones with badges) will; be “going wild” taking advantage of the fact that NOBODY has a gun, with which to oppose them. They SAY their goal is to “stop gun crime.” But really, it is to make SELF-DEFENSE illegal and INCREASE gun crime for the politicians.. (Just common sense)

"Police Forces Are Racist!"

That's what Obama says, and it's a LOAD of bull sh*t, as usual. The only racism that is “systemic” today is that PROMOTED by Obama and his accomplices, at all levels. That is the BLACK racism against WHITES. Blacks had come a long way in their fight against white racism against blacks. There are more black politicians in office today than ever before. And many of them are in office in the South, where white against black racism USED to be rampant, and government enforced. Black mayors, black governors, even black senators and representatives from areas that used to be solidly white supremacist. It's notable that the police chief in Dallas, where a black supremacist killed five cops is black. There is NO evidence of white against black racism being prevalent, so promoters use every single POSSIBLE event they can TWIST to impute racism. Events such as the killing of Michael Brown in Ferguson, MO, who was killed while he tried HARD to kill a white cop. There was good reason to kill him, but activists LIED and promoted it as “evidence of racism,” ruining the career of a good cop. The lie persists to this day. (CNN)

Hashtag Really Worked

Didn’t it? After Boko Haram kidnapped 300 young girls and threatened to “sell them into sex slavery,” Obama did something really terrible that “scared the beejeebers” [sic] out of Boko Haram. He created a Twitter hashtag and had his wife hold it up. It said, “Bring Back Our Girls.” So far, zero girls have been returned, and 20 more females have been taken at gunpoint. Grown women this time. That’s a “middle finger in the air” to America. Meanwhile, they have continued killing people. If Obama thought we were too powerful on the world stage, he has accomplished his purpose. NOBODY respects us, any more, and will not, as long as Obama is in charge. Maybe he needs to create a hashtag that says, #Respect America. That ought to do it. I notice the terrorists still are afraid to show their faces.(Just common sense)

Obama: "Just Shut Up!"

The State Department wants us to just SHUT UP about Benghazi. In fact, they want us t shut up about Libya, altogether, and they’re putting pressure on the media to do so. What does Obama have to hide about that disaster? A lot of time has passed since that massacre, and NOTHING has been done; not by Libya, not by US. The Libyan “government” has done nothing. Meanwhile, CNN has had a reporter INTERVIEW the leader of that attack while drinking a latte in a coffee shop, while Libya can’t find out who or where they are. Something’s WRONG here, and I think it’s called Obama. I think that ambassador had “hard evidence” that Obama was RUNNING GUNS to the terrorists and had to die. His complete LACK of action tells me this isn’t an outlandish assessment. (Town Hall)

"Why Use A Bomb?"

Monday morning quarterbacks are now questioning Dallas Police Chief Brown's authorizing the use of a BOMB attached to a robot to “take out” the sniper who had already killed five of his officers and wounded a bunch of others. He was well fortified, and any other method would have put more officers in deadly danger. Somebody who would TARGET cops and kill from ambush deserves to be “taken down” any way possible. He expected that he might be killed during his “shooting spree,” but planned on taking even more cops with him. Instead, that garage got a new paint job:what's left of the shooter. And it was well deserved. Dead is dead, and it really doesn't matter what method is used to take such a man down. This guy was a military trained attacker, and the cops were entitled to use whatever would end the attack while injuring or killing the fewest number of cops. She shooter became a new coat of paint. He deserved it. (Fusion)

Blacks Are In Danger

So DISARM them!” That's apparently what that dismal fool, Obama is telling us. He's preaching the same tune the “Black Lives Matter” crowd is preaching, that cops are bent on killing as many black men as they can, which is totally FALSE. A lot fewer black men are killed by cops than are killed by OTHER black men. That's what the figures tell us, but the BLM fools don't want us to know that. And the politician's answer to ALL gun violence, even at the hands of the cops, is to DISARM the citizens. Obama is importing hundreds of thousands of Islamic terrorists, who have vowed to KILL us for not converting to their religion, and at the same time, is trying HARD to DISARM us. What his purpose in that is, is unclear. I think he WANTS more gun violence so he can make more laws against guns and tax them at a higher rate. And he doesn't care how many people die to accomplish his goals. (Truth About Guns)

More Gun Control

Within HOURS of the Dallas police massacre Obama was out calling for more gun control. As if the guns used to kill those cops were bought legally and could have been kept out of the hands of the killer. The anti-gun fools, of which Obama is the number ONE, are completely blind to the idea that it isn't the GUN that's at fault, it's the FOOL holding the gun. He thinks, in his ignorance, that getting rid of the legal guns will solve the “problem.” It will not. The “bad guys” will still get their guns, ILLEGALLY and keep on with their killing ways. If those fools ever come up with some REAL “gun laws,” I'll be right with them. But they aren't smart enough. They've proven that, time and time again, while people with ILLEGAL guns keep on killing people. I'm really getting tired of saying this, and being ignored by the fools who make those absurd “gun laws” that do NOTHING to stop gun violence. (Robert Farago/TTAG)

"NRA Is At Fault

It's the same old song they've sung hundreds of times. Any time somebody gets killed by a gun, be it in the hands of a criminal, terrorist, or even a COP, it's got to be the fault of the NRA. In the case of the cop shooting that killed a black man who was only reaching for his ID after he told them he had a legally registered gun in his pocket, they blame the NRA for what seems to their little minds a good reason. If not for the NRA, he wouldn't have BEEN a licensed carrier and that poor, frightened cop wouldn't have shot him. Thus again, blaming the gun, for an ill-trained cop's panicked killing of an innocent man, just because he was carrying a gun. You could hear the panic in that cop's voice as he tried to justify his shot. He screeched, “I TOLD him not to reach for that!” when he DID. He TOLD him to give him his ID. That's not the fault of the NRA, it's a failure of TRAINING, coupled with the panic, created by the “Black Lives Matter” crowd putting ALL cops “on edge,” knowing that they have a target in their chests. (New York Daily News)

They Don't Understand

People in other countries where they aren't guaranteed the right to own and use a gun for self defense, just don't understand our “passion for our guns.” They know nothing about the right to self defense, and to own and use the means to it, a gun, that the Founders made sure we had. They don't understand that the only REAL defense is to be equally armed when a criminal or terrorists approaches you with his ILLEGAL gun because they've never had that right. They accept the crap the anti-gun fools feed them that it's only “passion for guns” and not the “will to self defense” that drives us. That's their loss. They'll never know the power that comes from being able to defend yourself, and not wait for the cops while some fool with an ILLEGAL gun victimizes you. The cops themselves, will tell you that they can't be everywhere at once, and the very best means of defending yourself is YOU, and your right to own the proper tool for it, a gun. Salon is a liberal rag, so take what they say with a huge grain of salt. (Salon)

Bad Gun Laws

Or is that a repetition? ALL gun laws, so far made, are bad. “Gun-free zones,” for instance. How may mass shootings have happened in areas that are “gun-free zones?” ALL of them. Potential shooters who plan on mass murder aren't going to worry about an unimportant little law” that says they can't bring their guns in a certain area. In fact, according to one mass shooter, they SEARCH OUT gun-free zones” in which to do their outrages. The area in which the Orlando killer murdered 49 people and wounded as many more was a “gun-free zone,” and he bought his guns legally because he had not, as yet, done anything to give him a criminal record. That's the biggest problem with ALL “gun laws.” They only apply to honest, law-abiding people. Those who are not the problem, at all.

Anti-gun fools have a hard time making their gun laws today, because people (other than them) know they are USELESS. Most of them are Democrats. “The difficulty the Democrats face is that, stripped of the emotion and politically driven posturing, their legislative demands either flagrantly violate the Constitutional rights of law abiding citizens, or are hopelessly ineffective and unenforceable against would-be terrorists and mass murderers.” Liberals (Democrats) rejected the whole idea of “reasonable suspicion” when they managed to outlaw “stop and frisk” in New York City (a very effective crime fighting tool). But that's the very thing they want to base their putting people's names on a “no-fly list,” which is as they use it, a “no-gun list.” If they ever come up with a law that WILL do anything, I'd be right there with them. But as long as they come up with these duds, I will not. (Reformer)

"Shoot Up the NRA?"

Adjunct Professor James Pearce, at Southern State Community College (SSCC) has advocated “Shooting up the NRA and making sure they're all dead.” He didn't use those exact words, but that was his meaning. Leave it to anti-gun fools like this to advocate using GUNS to eliminate people who favored GUNS in defense of themselves. And they don't understand the “disconnect” from reality such a thing exhibits. This is not the first time an anti-gun fool has advocated SHOOTING a pro-gun person. They're kind of stupid that way. They're so deep in their unreasoning hatred of guns they're blind to the contradiction. They think killing everybody at the NRA will stop Americans from their work in maintaining our constitutional right to be armed for self defense. To do that, they'd have to murder MILLIONS of people. They'd have to go after other prominent organizations with the same goal, too. Those executives they want to kill would quickly be replaced, and the work of the NRA would continue. They just can't understand that. SSCC is considering his termination. (Campus Reform)

Envying Incompetence

The mayor of Louisville, KY is dissatisfied with the gun laws that are prevalent in his “neck of the woods.” He wishes they had laws more like those in Chicago. If that doesn't illustrate INCOMPETENCE, I don't know what would. Yes, Chicago has some of the toughest gun laws in the nation. So tough, in fact, that some have been declared unconstitutional. Yet, at the same time, Chicago has some of the WORST gun violence statistics in the nation, and that doesn't tell this mayor they aren't working? Yet he wishes they had similar (non-working) gun laws in his city. That's incompetence! Chicago's gun death rate has risen right along with the “toughness” of their anti-gun laws, but people like this mayor wishes they had similar laws in their city? What kind of a FOOL is he? Anybody with a modicum of intelligence (which apparently doesn't include this mayor OR other anti-gun fools) realizes that ALL their anti-gun laws not only do NOT reduce gun violence, but instead, INCREASE it. The number of homicides in Chicago EXCEEDS that of Los Angeles and New York City, COMBINED. There have been 2, 026 gunshot victims SO FAR in 2016 alone, in Chicago! If this mayor, who is a Democrat (of course!), thinks such laws are a SOLUTION to crime problems, he should contact me about that bridge in Brooklyn that I have for sale. (Breitbart)

Schumer Doesn't Understand

Senator Schumer (Democrat, of course) apparently doesn't understand how the Constitution works. He thinks you can routinely violate it in an “emergency.” He says other constitutional measures have been ignored “in an emergency,” and he's right. But that doesn't make it legal. Politicians routinely violate the Constitution when it pleases them, because the Founders failed to prescribe a PUNISHMENT for doing so. They only provided for a reversal of an unconstitutional action, not a PUNISHMENT for the politician who did it, or TRIED to do it. Schumer, who is in the business of making laws, really should understand how the Constitution, on which ALL our laws are based, works. But he doesn't. He thinks you can legally violate it, just by declaring an “emergency.” Then you make a "statute." Fortunately, you can't negate a constitutional right by making a statute. the Constitution is a SUPERIOR form of law to a statute in America. (National Review)

Open Season On Cops

The :Black Lives Matter” crowd claims that cops have a campaign on to kill black men. That's foolishness. It's the other way around. The “Black Lives Matter” crowd's rhetoric tells already unstable people that it's now okay to kill COPS. So they do. They go out LOOKING for cops to kill. And cops accommodate them by running around in well-marked cars, wearing uniforms with convenient shiny “targets” on their chests. If they're not diligent and aware every second, they get shot and killed from ambush, usually from behind, with NO CHANCE to defend themselves. So they're nervous, and quick to shoot. Something those fools CLAIM is already true. And the “Black Lives Matter” crowd thinks this is okay. They're CREATING the very situation they CLAIM they don't like: cops running around, nervously looking over their shoulders because around the next corner there might be a fool waiting to kill them for nothing except that they're cops. The anti-gun fools tell us that law-abiding people carrying guns are a danger to us, when they're NOT, for the most part. It's the people carrying ILLEGAL guns that ARE. And their current laws do NOTHING to “stem the tide” of gun violence. (Truth About Guns)

"Constitution Is Outdated"

That's the opinion of 7^th Circuit Judge Richard Posner. He doesn't think law scholars should spend even a SECOND studying it. What many people don't know is the Constitution is the very BASIS for ALL our laws! Apparently this judge doesn't know that. If a law doesn't conform to the Constitution, is is not a law. The Constitution cannot be :outdated” because certain principles do not change over the years. It is this document that has kept us stable for almost 300 years. But the Founders made a BIG mistake. They didn't provide for a PENALTY for TRYING to violate the Constitution, or for the actual violation. They must not have thought anybody would ever TRY. The only “punishment” was to have the unconstitutional law reversed, but not before it had been enforced, sometimes for years, before it happens, sometimes ruining lives and costing people $millions in money and property. A judge with such opinions is not doing his job, is incompetent, and should be FIRED. (Patriot Post)

Laws Absolutely Don't Work!

Chicago has some of the toughest anti-gun laws in the nation. Some of them are so tough, they have been declared unconstitutional. Yet over the July 4 weekend, 33 people were shot. I hate to keep harping on this, but if I do, maybe some day somebody will actually notice, and DO something about that. Where did the shooters GET their guns? And how? ILLEGALLY, of course. Criminals don't obey laws. So laws making it illegal to own guns only affect honest, law-abiding people, not the criminals. So the only common sense way to reduce the deaths of innocent people at the hands of those criminals is to give the potential victims the ability to fight back.

That means allowing them to have, and carry their own guns. Yes, that will INCREASE gun violence—for a while—as those honest people kill the users of illegal weapons who try to victimize them. Then it will go WAY down, and stay there, because most of those who do that violence will be dead. It's a simple solution, but one the anti-gun liberals won't even hear of. They think if everybody was armed, they would shoot each other over trifles—which criminals do, now. But, as Robert Heinlein once said, “An armed society is a polite society,” for a good reason. It will no longer be a case of an armed man against an UNARMED person. All the current laws are USELESS to do the job for which they are designed. They know that, but they keep making them. If I had a dime for every time I've said this, I'd be a rich man, now. But nobody's listening. (Chicago Tribune)

"Not Intentional"

FBI Director James Comey says there will be no charges against Hillary Clinton for being so careless about classified information in her e-mails because she didn't “intend” to. Why then, did she set up a private server in the first place? They must have something on him because this is prima facie evidence that “the fix is in.” I don't think it's because of any wrongdoing on his part. Maybe they threatened his family. There's a lot at stake, and crossing the Clintons is important enough to kill for. If you don't think this was important enough to put terminal pressure on him, I feel sorry for you. They prosecuted General Petraeus for telling his mistress some classified information. Do they really think he INTENDED to tell her? INTENT makes no difference when it comes to releasing classified information because doing so can put lives in danger, regardless of intent, or lack thereof. Further, nobody who has such a careless control of such information has ANY business being president. She is an INCOMPETENT politician, but that doesn't seem to be a problem in DC. The Clintons, and the AG, are probably having a party today, and laughing their considerable butts off at us.(Patriot Post)

Swiss Do the "Unthinkable"

At least as far as liberals, the world over, will think. They denied citizenship to 2 young girls for “not assimilating” into the Swiss culture. What they did was refuse to take compulsory swimming lessons in school because boys would be in the pool at the same time. They said it was because their “religion prevented them from swimming in the same pool with boys.” which is carrying it a little too far. Boy, Muslims are really afraid somebody might see their women and maybe want them. Even if that's a stretch. It's an outgrowth of the Muslim practice of HIDING their women from the world, lest someone would rape them. They know how prone their own men are to rape, so it frightens them. They're deathly afraid of assimilating into ANY culture but their own, even if they move into other cultures. They insist those new cultures “bend to THEIR will.” In Switzerland, they don't have Constitutional protection for “religious” practices to overturn local laws, like we do. (World Net Daily)

Two In the Chest

And call me in the morning (if you can). That's the prescription this fool got filled at this pharmacy. He tried to rob a pharmacy in Waynesboro, PA and a pharmacy employee gave him two bullets instead of drugs, or money. A legally armed employee who was there when the gunman pulled a gun and started demanding money and drugs, grabbed his own gun and put four in the robber. The robber was only critically injured. Too bad. If the guy had been a better shot, there'd be one less robber out there. As it is, he'll be able to rob again after he gets out of prison. This pharmacy had previously been the target of holdup men, and employees decided to do something to get ready for the next one. This situation probably won't make the media outside of the locals, because it doesn't advance their agenda to disarm Americans. This proves again, my contention that armed citizens holdup men don't know are there can make ALL the difference. (Concealed Nation)

They'll Wish They Weren't Alive"

That’s what Harvey Weinstein says about his upcoming movie he is making to knock the NRA. Never mind he has made many, many movies featurimg much gun violence, more than ever happens in real life. Ted Cruz says such movies rarely do well at the box office and predicts this one won’t, either. He calls attention to the fact that Weinstein HIRES gun-toting “security” for himself, but doesn’t want Mama to ever be able to defend herself against ILLEGALLY-armed criminals who want to victimize her. He calls people who want to have guns for self-protection “paranoid,” completely ignoring the fact that it’s not “paranoid” to recognize a very real danger, as HE does when he hires his gun-toting bodyguards for his own protection. (The Blaze)

Rejecting the Solution

In the face of sure knowledge that “gun-free zones” not only do NOT keep crazies from coming into those zones to kill people, they actually CAUSE many deaths, schools still insist on keeping their schools as “gun-free zones” while KNOWING that criminals and crazies don’t obey rules OR laws. The solution to the problem, as proven in TWO school shootings since the Sandy Hook killings, somebody ON THE SCENE with a gun can stop mass shootings before they become “mass” shootings. In these two cases, armed “resource officers” (non-uniformed, I hope) were on the scene in ONE MINUTE and put a stop to the shooter’s plans. In these cases it was a “resource officer” who stopped the shooting. Resource officers are expensive, and many schools can’t afford them. So why NOT allow staff who have carry permits and training to be armed at NO COST to the school and are not in a uniform so they can be shot FIRST, by surprise? Too many “stone-headed” school officials disagree. That’s incompetence, but they ARE “in charge. (Buckeye Firearms Association)

Admits Gun Laws Don't Work

Bloomberg’s top paid gun-grabber quits, and ADMITS that the gun laws they make today, hoping to reduce gun violence—don’t. Mark Glaze, Executive director of Bloomberg’s “Everytown for Gun Safety” group, resigned. While admitting what they have worked for does NOT work. He says the measures promoted by that group haven’t worked in the past and would not work in the future, so why promote them? Gun control has never saved ANY lives. In fact, it has CAUSED the deaths of many people who were faced by criminals or crazies with ILLEGAL guns and they couldn’t respond, or respond fast enough. What they hoped to accomplish, according to this article, is NO OPPOSITION for government agents when they impose tyranny and exterminate minority populations. (Bob Owens)

Forcing the Gay Agenda

That seems to be Obama's “big thing” today, outside of taking our guns away. He's working HARD to force the radical gay rights agenda on the rest of us. The Constitution doesn't seem to matter if it gets “crossways” with the radical gay agenda. Gay activists search diligently for a bakery run by devout Christians that can be depended on to refuse to bake a cake for their “weddings” so they can sue them out of business and take a lot of money from them. And they're helped by corrupt judges, that give them outlandish “awards.” Muslims do it, too. They force people to allow MEN in women's bathrooms and changing rooms if they “identify” as a woman that day. And there are other silly things they do to promote it, including making trouble for ANYBODY who disparages them, calling it “:hate speech.” Never mind gays are only a very small percentage of the total population, they insist their needs and wishes be out in front of those of everybody else. I don't know why he's doing it, except to further screw up society. (World Net Daily)

"Abortion Yes, Guns No"

That's what it seems. Abortion is systematic MURDER of defenseless infants. How is it possible for that to be protected by the Constitution, when the right to own a gun is NOT, especially since the Second amendment, that SUPPORTS gun rights, is as simple and easy to understand as it is for intelligent people? Where, in the Constitution, does it say it's okay to MURDER defenseless infants? They SAY it's a matter of “a woman's right to choose” what happens to her own body, but it's NOT. If it were, prostitution would be legal. It's about that infant's right to LIFE. An abortion is just as hard on her body as is child birth, so what's the problem? The problem, for the mother, AND the father, is that childbirth requires them to take responsibility for the result of their unprotected sex and actually RAISE that child. With abortion, they only have to “get rid of the tiny body.” And in most cases today, they can SELL the tiny body parts if they go through Planned Parenthood. (Net Right Daily)