Wednesday, May 4, 2011
Obama (Finally) Releases His Birth Certificate
But is it real? Obama has access to the best forgers of documents in the world. He can create a document that cannot be told from the real thing. He can even get a false document placed in the records, since he controls them. But until proven otherwise, I’ll accept it unless on seeing it, I see something amiss. The question still remains: why did he wait 2-1/2 years to release it? Did it take him that long to phony-up one? If he had it all the time, why refuse to produce it and even spend millions of taxpayer dollars to avoid showing it? He belittles us asking this important question, but it is actually the most important question going; if Obama was NOT born in the USA, he is not ELIGIBLE to be president and everything he has done AS president legally did not happen. It’s NOT a “side-show” as he alleged. It’s the very CENTER of importance. (Mail.com)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
I sat an interesting question the other day. Someone asked, "Did they have fonts in '61?" The birth certificate should have had a typewriter-written look. It looks done on a computer.....
Anon: Yes, they did. I can testify as one who worked with fonts in the sixties. But not on computers outside of science labs and computer centers, since computers in those days weren't for everybody. But you're right, the type is one of many things that look suspicious on that "birth certificate." another is the hospital name. It had a very different name then; another is the use of the word "African" to describe his father's RACE. They didn't use "African-American or any form of it to describe blacks then. VERY suspicious.
Yes. Very suspicious. It makes me think obama created it on his laptop.
Anon: No, one of his henchmen did it. Doing such things is below Obama (he thinks).
Post a Comment