Bloomberg Violating the Law

He spent almost a billion dollars to buy the Dumocrat nomination for president. That’s legal. Any individual can spend as much of his own money to run for any office. That’s legal. But then after that failed, he then transferred $18 million to the Dumocrat Party. That’s when he violated campaign finance laws. He probably thought he could get away with that because the election commission is run by Dumocrats for the most part, and they have no objection to a candidate violating their laws as long as he’s a Dumocrat. They’ll work hard to cover it up, especially if it benefits Dumocrats. And a free $18 million definitely benefits Dumocrats. He violated election laws in New York City when he ran for and was elected to, a third term—something that is illegal. He was not called to account for that, so he thought he could do this, too, since the money benefited Dumocrats. Now we’ll just wait and see if this obvious law violation—his second—will be punished. (Trump Train News)

Maryland Shooting

Maryland has some of the tightest anti-gun laws in the nation, right up there with DC. That mall was a “gun-free zone.” Yet some fool who had a grudge against somebody came in and killed two people and himself. How’s that “gun-free zone” workin’ our for ya? Many, many times I have said this, and I’ll say it again: gun-free zones are an OPEN INVITATION to fools to come in and shoot people. How many more people need to die before the fools in power figure it out? Why we (not me) keep sending these fools to Washington and our own state capital, I don’t know. Are we all (not me) stupid? NO; we’re just uninformed about them. We need to GET informed about ANYBODY we elect to office BEFORE we elect them. (Bearing Arms)

"Worried About Guns"

The legal ones, anyway. “Gen Z,” America’s youngest, are more worried about “gun violence” than anything else. Yet they “take on” the very organization that actually wants to do something meaningful about it, and support those anti-gun fools who pass laws that do NOTHING to “reduce gun violence,” the NRA. They have been “programmed” to believe that the NRA is stopping all efforts to reduce gun violence, when they are the ones who are actively working to do so. The anti-gun fools have to know their laws and regulations not only do not work, but actually make it worse, by disarming the law-abiding, making them “easy targets” for those who obey no laws and want to victimize the innocent. This leads me to believe that they are NOT interested in “gun control.” They are interested in “people control.” Having the power to tell us we can or can’t do a thing, or own and use an item that is, without a human being to use it, is an inanimate object. They “bad-mouth” legislatures, saying they aren’t “doing their jobs” by not passing more USELESS laws that accomplish NOTHING. It’s all just a stupid exercise, but they either don’t realize that, or they just don’t care. (You Tube)

It's NOT Racism!

Nor is it “Islamaphobia. Islamaphobia is a “made-up word” to cast ANY criticism of a Muslim as something mean and vicious. It’s meant to STOP people from opposing a Muslim, in any way, without requiring that Muslim to give any answers to their questions. It’s being used liberally in the State of Michigan, which right now has a Muslim serious candidate for governor. That candidate was recently asked a logical and proper question about his support of Sharia Law, and he “went off” on the questioner, accusing him of Islamaphobia, racism, and any other insult he could find. This is typical in any case where anybody criticizes a Muslim, for anything. They just don’t brook ANY criticism, from anybody, any time. This is why we should never elect a Muslim to ANY office. Not because of his religion, but because of “the content of his character” (as Martin Luther King once stated). Muslims are taught by their religion NEVER to “bow down to anybody but Allah,” and way too many Muslims take that seriously, as a Muslim defendant refused to stand in court when the judge entered, to his own detriment. They have way too many ideas that are an anathema to intelligent Americans and should never be allowed to spout them from an elected post. If that’s racism, then I’m guilty. If we allow them to be elected to office in enough numbers, they will take over this country without a shot being fired. And that’s what way too many Muslim extremists are after. (Trending Right Wing News)

"Second Amendment Not Absolute"

That’s what Dumocrat presidential candidate “Sniffer Joe” Biden thinks, anyway, while he uses that to take away our right to SELF DEFENSE through gun confiscation. And to prove it he directs our attention to the FIRST Amendment’s “exception” for “shouting fire in a crowded theater.” But that is “apples and oranges.” It looks similar, but it is a completely different thing. Nowhere in the First Amendment does it mention “shouting fire in a crowded theater.” That is simply something some people SAID about freedom of speech. The First Amendment was not MEANT to be absolute, whereas the Second WAS. It excepts libel and slander. The First Amendment reads: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”

Nowhere does it mention fire in a crowded theater. The Second Amendment is very simple. It says, “[T]he right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” Though preceded by unnecessary words, THAT is absolute. References to an “organized militia aside, which at the time meant ALL THE PEOPLE, it still says unequivocally that we are allowed to “bear arms,” and that right “shall not be infringed.” NO specific arms are named, and that means ALL arms are covered. The government, at the time, was not “awash in money” as it is today, and they wanted those people to bring their own guns. From the writings of the Founders we can see their wish that all people be allowed the right to SELF DEFENSE and to own and use the means to that, a gun. Even against the government, if need be. (Just common sense)

What SHOULD They Do?

The anti-gun fools among us are fond of taking the lawmakers to task for “not doing their jobs” and making more anti-gun laws. Which demands answer to the question, “What in the hell should they DO?” They make law after law, and the people it should apply to just ignore them and continue to buy their guns illegally or just steal them. Meanwhile, the law-abiding, who OBEY laws, even STUPID ones, are defenseless in the face of those law breakers. It’s almost like they planned it that way. The whole point is, nobody can figure out a law that will actually WORK. I certainly can’t, and I’m presumed, by politicians, to be “not as smart” as they are. I keep asking this question of the anti-gun fools, and they keep not answering. Maybe because they HAVE no answer? Because there IS no answer. If there were a law they could pass that would make one iota of difference, those “smart folks” would have come up with it, and passed it. But NO! All they do is bi-ch and gripe that nobody HAS passed up such a bill into law, as if they are derelict in their duty for not doing so. (Lewiston Tribune)

In A "Free Country"

A free country that has a First Amendment guaranteeing freedom of speech, students are now having to SUE for the right to wear pro-Second Amendment T-shirts. That’s what’s happening in Waukesha County, Wisconsin, where students are reduced to having to SUE to be able to exercise a constitutional right to free speech and support of another. The school’s principal told the students that their shirts “violated the school’s dress code” and must be covered up. A clear violation of their constitutional right to freedom of speech under color of “dress codes.” The vice principal thinks banning T-shirts depicting guns helps “reduce violence.” A typical anti-gun FOOL thought. They say T-shirts depicting guns is not covered as “free speech” and the school is entitled to regulate them. WRONG! Just because you don’t approve of a pro-gun T-shirt doesn’t take away the student’s freedom of speech RIGHT. The T-shirts do not support violence. They only support a constitutional right, and there are judicial decisions supporting that. Those school “officials” are going to get a lesson in pro-gun case law when this case gets into court. (Bearing Arms)

Obama Is the Past

They’re a little late. I’m seeing “exposés” about people “finding proof” that Barack Obama was an impostor and was actually born outside the United States. I see these often, but what’s the point? Obama is in the past. He is no longer president, and nobody’s going to go back and reverse everything he did as president—except for the current president, who is doing just that. But not on the basis of him being an illegal president, on the basis of his ideas and policies being stupid and dangerous to the nation. Obama had no idea how to bring back a good economy, so he covered his behind by telling us things like “all those jobs that have gone overseas aren’t coming back so we might as well get used to high unemployment numbers.” Then he went on to make it worse by telling us “The bad times are now ‘the new norm’ and ‘good times’ are not coming back, so get used to it.” Unfortunately for him, Trump wasn’t the incompetent he was. The minute he took over the presidency, he began bringing those things back, and making the economy boom, putting the lie to Obama’s gloom and doom predictions. So why is anybody wasting time trying to prove Obama was an illegal president? It just doesn’t matter any more. We now have a competent president who is daily making things better. (The Informed American)

Are MacDonalds "Gun Free?"

McDonald’s and some other franchises are somewhat “wishy-washy” about being “gun-free zones,” although they definitely lean in that direction. They say they will “abide by local laws,” most of which mandate that such places ARE “gun-free zones.” How then, did a “gun fight” happen in a Charlotte, NC McDonald’s? Word is that two groups were talking when one person pulled out a gun and shot another, causing another to pull our his gun and do some more shooting. Luckily, they were very poor shots, and nobody was killed, although a car in a parking lot was hit. It is not known how badly the car was injured. What is obvious here is that McDonald’s customers think nothing of ignoring such things and bring their guns everywhere they go, “gun-free zones” notwithstanding. On the contrary, “gun-free zones are a MAGNET for would-be shooters, everywhere. 100% of all mass shootings have HAPPENED in “gun-free zones.” Why then, do they keep making them? Are they just stupid, or what? (Charlotte Observer)

They're Really Frightened

“Sniffer Joe” Biden is the last hope of the Dumocrats who hope to win back the presidency in 2020, and they don’t want anybody to investigate either his, or his son’s business dealings so now they’re threatening a “scorched Earth” policy against Trump’s progeny if we actually investigate Biden of his son. Never mind Biden actually went on TV and BRAGGED about withholding Congress-approved billions for Ukraine until a prosecutor investigating Biden’s son’s business practices in the Ukraine is fired, and then gloatingly said, “SOB—He got fired! Never mind his son was named to the board of a Ukrainian oil company with a $50,000.00 MONTHLY salary, with NO EXPERIENCE anywhere in the oil industry. Plus many other very shaky deals, buttressed by Biden’s former position as VP. They really think this threat makes sense, since Trump’s kids have no salaries, but have to set up residences in Washington to be close to their father. And they have been under a “scorched Earth” policy by Dumocrats since the day Trump announced his candidacy. Add to that the fact that Trump is giving his salary as president away, and their threats are useless. (Steadfast & Loyal)

Politics Is Violent

Now more than ever. One of the things I’ve always felt confident in is my ability to say what I wish in a free society. I used to put bumper stickers on my car about the things about which I felt strongly—until one day some fool “egged” my car because of the “A Is A” sticker there. Somebody who obviously knew about Ayn Rand’s philosophy but disagreed with it. That ended my putting stickers on my cars. I still freely gave my opinions, but kept the knowledge of what I was thinking confined to my writings without letting the “average person” know in public. But at the time it was a small thing to me. Today it is a lot more important to keep my opinions out of the public eye locally. That’s because I don’t want to be physically assaulted by some young fool for my opinions because they don’t agree with theirs. I’m now in my eighties and such an assault could be fatal to me. That’s why you’ll never see me wearing a “MAGA” hat, even though I’m solidly in President Trump’s corner. I just don’t want some damned fool liberal to see it and beat my head in because of it. (The Blaze)

Revealing the Weakness

Sen. Kamala Harris, Dumocrat from California, is basically calling for a GUN BAN, which reveals the logical weakness in the arguments of all anti-gun fools. Even though a gun ban would be immediately judged to be unconstitutional, such a ban would be roundly IGNORED by criminals, who don’t obey ANY laws, so why does she expect them to obey hers? She claimed, “[T]here is no reason in a civil society that we have assault weapons around communities.” But there is. A GOOD reason. There are also lots of ILLEGAL guns of all kinds, already there, and we need to be similarly armed, in order to defend ourselves against them. Anti-gun fools like her talk about all the “gun violence,” never mentioning that almost ALL of it is done by people who have NOT gotten their guns legally. But fools like her never mention this. They assume that such people go to gun stores and stand for background checks, while accepting those tiny magazines that hold less than ten rounds. They do NOT. And no amount of LAWS will ever make them do so. That’s the weakness. (NRA-ILA)

Critizing Trump for Criticizing

Trump is criticizing Dumocrat candidates running to replace him in his job. Surprise, surprise! Dumocrats don’t like it. As if they had not spent the last three years flinging the most vile criticisms at Trump. I guess they think only they are allowed to criticize. The word I hear most often in Dumocrat criticisms is “incompetence.” What they base that on is a mystery because Trump is the most COMPETENT president we’ve had recently. He has done more for this country than all recent presidents combined, Reagan excepted. More than all Dumocrat presidents, certainly. Until the Coronavirus intervened, the Stock Market was hitting record highs mostly daily. Unemployment is lower than it has EVER been. All the Dumocrats can do is holler “bubble!” Claiming we are due for “the biggest recession ever.” Something they have no figures to back up, of course, but which they still claim. One Dumocrat said that if we continued to investigate Biden and his son and sister’s finances, they would open a “scorched Earth investigation” of Trump’s kids—as if there was anything to investigate. But they’re sorely frightened we will find what the Bidens have been hiding so they threaten Trump’s very existence if he doesn’t stop investigating before he finds it. (Just common sense)

Against Self Defense

That’s what the anti-gun fools are pushing. They hate the very idea of self defense, but deny it, saying, we just want to reduce “gun crime.” Remember that fool in Texas who brought a shotgun into a church under his coat and started killing people with it? We now know he was a felon and not permitted to own ANY gun legally. So after a licensed gun carrier shot him and kept his “kill rate” very low, what do the anti-gun fools do? They moved to make laws to stop not the shooter being able to carry a gun, but to keep those heroic Texans from being able to bring their guns into church, leaving those church-goers completely defenseless against his illegally-owned gun. They made it about criticizing the fact that there were so many LEGAL guns there. Never mind those legal guns did not kill any innocent people and the one ILLEGAL gun did. They weren’t worried about the many laws the shooter broke when he came into that church to kill. They were “concerned” about the “danger” involved in parishioners being able to bring their guns into the church. That proves conclusively that their purpose is to remove the right to self defense from all people (except those who get their guns illegally, of course). Fortunately, wiser heads prevailed and laws were made to allow armed security in churches. (America’s First Freedom)

"The Right to Be Safe"

“Trumps the right to be armed.” That’s the very confusing statement that was made by known anti-gun fool Dumocrat California Rep Eric Sawlwell. It’s difficult for INTELLIGENT people to understand how making yourself DEFENSELESS against the millions of ILLEGAL guns there are already out there makes you “safe.” this fool has to know that NONE of those highly touted “anti-gun laws” have ever done ONE THING to stop, or even slow down “gun crime.” Criminals, who obey NO LAWS, simply ignore them and go on using their ILLEGAL guns to victimize the law-abiding who, since they DO obey laws, are usually unarmed. We keep throwing this at anti-gun fools, but they never answer it. They just ignore us, and keep making their USELESS, unenforceable “gun laws.” This tells me they’re either stupid, or just corrupt, and want to disarm ALL Americans, so their friends, the criminals, can more easily victimize the law-abiding. I can’t think of any other reason why, KNOWING their laws don’t work, they insist on making more and more of them, while IGNORING sure solutions because they require arming the law-abiding. I get very tired of repeating the same things over and over while they just ignore me and keep making their insane, useless laws. (Breitbart)

It's Not the Virus

The Coronavirus is a frightening thing—because the liberal media has made it that way. The result is that we are committing economic suicide while trying to fight a pandemic. The Coronavirus pandemic will be over soon, but the economic effect of all the “shutdowns” enacted “to slow the progression of the disease” will have had a disastrous effect on this country. Many businesses will fold from lack of business. In spite of Trump’s feeble efforts in giving each American $1,000.00 of someone else’s money, soon there will be no money left for people to use in buying anything, which will lead to the biggest depression we’ve ever seen. A depression to make the original look insipid. And pumping more money into the economy by repeating Trump’s $1,000 bucks to everybody will not help, because that just is not enough to make a dent in the problem. In order to bring the economy back, it will need a lot more money in private hands than that, and it will just not be there. We will have committed economic suicide to avoid a physical pandemic. And we will be finished. I’ll be dead by then. Will you? Or will you have to suffer through what will be coming? (Just common sense)

The Global Warming Scam

Global warming, now known as “climate change,” is a SWINDLE designed to take as much money from the gullible as possible. The reason why global warming has a new name is that they found out that the “globe” had NOT been “warming” for almost 20 years, and the name “global warming” did not work any more. So they changed its name to “climate change,” which was a more “neutral” description that would allow them to tell us ANYTHING, cooling OR warming, was part of the “problem.” This scam has made AlGore, the former VP who made it popular, a billionaire, and he continues to promote it and coin the dough as he flies around I his private, polluting jets to con the “masses” about his swindle. Politicians have noted this and have “jumped on the bandwagon,” because they can use it to gain not only money, but many votes. But all os not “copacetic” for them any ore. People are “wising up” to the silliness in worrying about a 1% rise or lowering of temperature worldwide over 100 years and are not “kicking in” as much money as before. So not those “climate change promoters” want to make denying climate change a felony, punishable by a long prison sentence. I doubt if they will make it, but you never know. (Just common sense)

Gun Conrtol Doesn't Work

In Maryland, gun control laws haven’t worked to reduce gun crime. So what do “MOMS” want to do? Make more of them, of course! Never mind that doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result is the very DEFINITION of insanity. Anti-gun fools never learn that what they perennially propose is absolutely USELESS in accomplishing their goals. They flail about and make more and more of those USELESS laws, in spite of the fact that they do not work, and only make it easier for law breakers to victimize the law-abiding, by DISARMING them, for the most part. The other day, a tiny woman who was running a convenience store was approached by a big man who pointed a gun at her and demanded her money. So she shot him to death. That should happen much more often. Then maybe these fools who want to just TAKE what others have EARNED will go into another line of work. Maybe go to work for the government, which is in the same business they were in, but using laws, instead of guns, as the first level of intimidation. (WBAL TV)

"Hair On fire Reaction"

The “Swine Flu” pandemic in 2009 was as bad, or worse than Coronavirus, according to the numbers being posted right now, but it did not cause the “hair on fire reaction” the Coronavirus pandemic has already caused. Of course we know the figures will be different when it’s all over. But what is the major difference between the two? The name and political party of the president. When the Swine Flu surfaced in June, 2009, it took Obama FOUR MONTHS to declare a national emergency, while people died. When the Coronavirus surfaced, it took President Trump TWO DAYS to declare a national emergency and begin mandating other efforts to “slow down” the progression of the disease. Swine flu caused 60.8 million illnesses, 273,304 hospitalizations, and 12,469 deaths in the U.S. The Coronavirus has progressed much further since it surfaced in communist China. But were there mass cancellations of all mass gatherings of people in 2009? Were people “advised,” and sometimes REQUIRED to “stay at home?” Were many people, especially the elderly with other health issues physically AFRAID to go out? Nope. Yet the liberal media says it is Trump who is incompetent to battle this pandemic. Something they didn’t even suggest in 2009 of Obama. The only difference is the NAME of the president. The liberal media hates Trump with a passion, because they are “closely aligned” with the Dumocrat Party and want to do as much damage to President Trump as they can. In the process, they’re bankrupting America, which is okay with Dumocrats, as long as they can blame Trump for it. (American Thinker)

Socialism Is Stupidity!

Anybody who believes in socialism, or any other form of collectivism is stupid. I know that sounds harsh, but it is true. The only thing about socialism that even sounds good is the government GIVING things to those who won’t do for themselves, but prefer to live at the expense of others. What the proponents of socialism “gloss over” is that before they can give things to the slothful, they must first TAKE IT from those who are able and willing to EARN for themselves. They think the slothful are somehow ENTITLED to a part of the earnings of the producers of new wealth. Socialism creates NO new wealth. It only steals the new wealth EARNED by those who produce new wealth and GIVES that stolen to those who will not earn for themselves. Their very motto reveals them if you just examine it. It is this: “FROM each according to his ABILITY, and TO each according to his NEED.” Making need a DEMAND upon the earnings of the producers of new wealth. The only reason I can see for the recent popularity of socialism is that liberal teachers and professors have been consistently “singing the praises of socialism” in every school they can for many years, to impressionable youth, who have not been alive long enough to realize how WRONG they are. They have been BRAINWASHED into believing this LIE. (Just common sense)

NRA Is Still Immense!

The liberals and other anti-gun fools are exulting over what seems like a “decline” in the amount of money the NRA has to use in opposing their efforts to eliminate our constitutional right to own and use arms for self defense. What they don’t figure is that, maybe there are just not that many people left who want to retain that constitutional right who think it necessary to join the NRA. What they don’t tell you is that NRA membership is at 5 million paid members—the largest membership in their long history. Maybe there are so many who think the way they do are ALREADY members, so new memberships have “leveled off.” They are still the strongest voice in defense of that constitutional right, and will continue to be, despite a temporary lull. The point is, the desire to retain that constitutional right hasn’t ebbed at all. Just new memberships, for whatever reason. They’re still strong, and will remain strong, while anti-gun fool forces will decline, since their whole thing is based on an illegality. What the anti-gun fools propose is anti-constitutional, making it ILLEGAL. And that will ultimately defeat them. (Roll Call)

Committing Economic Suicide

The Coronoavirus isn’t going to kill us. Our response to it is. New York State, and many other states, are “closing up shop” hoping to keep the virus from spreading. By so doing, they have taken away the jobs of millions of restaurant and grocery workers, and all kinds of other workers. With that goes the salaries they earn, and with those salaries goes the money they pay for services and goods. Without that money, the providers of those goods and services will go out of business. And thus we die. Even if not a single victim of the virus dies. We will have done it to ourselves through panic. The liberal media is doing it’s best to promote that panic. Not because they want to cause panic, but because they ARE in panic, and, as with “gun control,” they have no idea of what to really do and they’re “lashing out” in every direction, trying everything they can think of, “Throwing things against the wall, hoping they stick.” By so doing, they are going to ruin us. All. People are buying guns by the millions. Some for defense against looters and other lawless, and others because they ARE the lawless. As the economic disaster worsens, people will be killed, as people try to get the things they need, but can’t afford because they have no salaries and their employers have no money to pay them. (Just common sense)

Megadonors

I’m at a loss to understand why “megadonors” are allowed to donate so much money to Dumocrats to keep them in business opposing Republicans. I thought there was a top limit on the amounts they could contribute, just to keep this from happening. I guess it is because the limits are only on the amount they can contribute to any one candidate, which Hollywood’s contributors “get around” by contributing the max to single candidates and spending millions using PACs and SUPERPACs to promote their candidacies while not actually contributing to THEM. There needs to be a new law limiting how much any contributor can contribute to any one PARTY without a matching contribution to the opposing party to even things out and keep them from “buying” elections, as Bloomberg had actually BRAGGED about doing. Or to make those PAC donations into “in-kind contributions” the way they do with Republican contributors. (Just common sense)

Gun Control's Real Goal

They've always got a “good reason” to take away your rights, but, as usual, the “good reason” is never the REAL reason. In gun control, that is as true as anywhere else. “Gun control is about money and power and control over you, and making you SUBMIT to government control, all the while making progress in the left's effort to reduce your individual rights, your Constitutional rights, and your freedoms.” It's as simple as that. It's all about POWER. The power to tell you what you can, and can't do. And their “laws” never stop, or even slow down “gun crime,” because they DEPEND on lawbreakers to OBEY their laws. A good example is “gun-free zones,” which would be better called, “killing fields,” because shooters NEVER hesitate to bring their guns in there and shoot people. In fact, they SEEK OUT gun free zones because they can be pretty sure the law-abiding won't be armed, there. They want to take away ANY possible weapon you can use for self defense.  (Totally Right)

Wrong Is Wrong

My sister noted recently that what I said about the “$1,000 for every working American” was not a good thing was the first time I’ve said anything against President Trump. That's because this is the first time I've seen Trump act like a politician instead of an intelligent human being. Sending $1,000 to each "working American" will not give them nearly enough to overcome the problems they will face because of the lack of a regular salary. It's just "a bandaid to cover a huge open wound." It's a political "solution" and won't work. And if the government continues to give away "other people's money," money they've TAKEN from their citizens, they will soon run out of money. Liberals have said, "If Trump shot and killed someone in Times Square, Trump supporters would not care, and would still support him." That may be true of some Trump supporters, but I "call a spade a spade." If my "idol" does something really stupid, I'm going to call it stupid. The answer is NOT to bankrupt ourselves in fear of what is a minor virus in the "grand scheme of things." Absolutely MOST of those who get it will be sick for a while and will then recover. It is mostly those whose constitution is already weakened by old age and prior health conditions who will die. Don't be afraid to go out if you are not one of those, but continue to take precautions. But go out, do business, but stay a few feet away from other people. Don't shake hands. Don't kiss people, and above all, don't have sex with someone other than someone you can be pretty sure doesn't have it. Like your husband, or wife. (Just common sense)

What's Wrong With America?

I never thought I’d see the day when Americans would APPROVE of the wanton MURDER of infants, in large numbers, all for the convenience of their parents. Abortion to save the life of the mother, I can see. But “abortion on demand,” just because the parents don’t want to bother raising the result of unprotected sex, I cannot. They might as well just “put out a contract” on the life of a living child because they don’t want it. that’s what they’ve done, because that child IS “a living being,” even though he may not have emerged from the womb yet. And they’re moving toward the day when they would approve of killing a LIVE infant who survived an abortion attempt. It may not have been done “officially,” but there are many cases where a live infant is left on a table to die of neglect, even if no concerted effort is made to kill it. Abortion is MURDER. No two ways about it. And the parents who have it done are ACCOMPLICES to murder, and should be charged, and imprisoned. If that includes members of my family (which I hope it does not), so be it. Murder is murder, and should be punished. Some think this stance is all about religion—it is NOT. I do not have “religious objections” to this murder, I have LOGICAL objections to it. Killing a human being IS murder. (Don Marcus)

Fighting Ignorance

FIGHTING IGNORANCE: The big problem with ALL the “gun control laws” is that they don’t work worth a damn, yet gun control advocates insist on continuing to make them. That is ignorance bordering on stupidity. Ignorance is simply a lack of information on a subject. Stupidity is having sufficient information, yet still making stupid decisions. That pretty much describes what the anti-gun fools are doing. They have to know their laws don’t work, but they keep making them, while not even entertaining a real solution like allowing the law-abiding to be armed, so they can defend themselves from the millions of ILLEGAL guns already out there in the hands of the law breakers. As a rule, the law-biding are not the ones who commit gun violence, yet they are the only ones their laws actually impede when they want to have a gun for self defense. A “gun-free zone” is an open invitation for a “bad guy” to come in and kill a few people. “Background checks” only (maybe) allow the cops to identify an evil-doer AFTER the crime has been committed. “Safe storage laws” and laws that keep guns in locked boxes, unloaded, while transporting them, only make them USELESS for self defense. And so on, and so forth. So why do we (not me) keep electing more and more stupid politicians to make more of those silly laws, that only hurt the law-abiding? (Just common sense)

Emanuel's Revenge

Dumocrat Rahm Emanuel, former mayor of the city of Chicago, and previous to that a close adviser to President Obama, once made a very honest statement. Something very rare for him. He said, “Never let a good crisis go to waste.” Meaning when something bad happens, take full advantage of it in getting your agenda adopted. So when China exported the Coronavirus to the rest of the world, politicians all over—mostly Dumocrats, of course—saw the unique opportunity the virus offered them to get their agendas enacted. All they had to do was tailor the response to the virus so that advancing their agendas seem like it’s a good thing to do to “fight the virus.” The anti-gun fools were right up front in that endeavor. People saw that there would come a time when the holders of illegal guns would come for their property and wanted to be ready to defend it, and themselves, so they started buying guns in large numbers, which was “troubling” to anti-gun fools in office. So they set out to strengthen their useless, unenforceable anti-gun laws to disarm the law-abiding and let the lawless victimize them at will. Do not allow them to succeed, because when the panic is over, the lawless will still have their guns, and the law-abiding will not. (Just common sense)

Will We Ever Know?

Rumors about Jeffery Epstein’s connections to well-known politicians are flying, but no proof of anything is found—or recognized when it was found. It is known at least that Bill Clinton, he of uncontrolled downward zipper, flew to Epstein’s “private sex island of pedophilia” on many occasions. But there doesn’t seem to be any evidence of what went on there while he was there. And there are many other well-known names who went there. It is known that at least two guards on his cell abandoned their posts, allowing either his suicide, or his murder. It is known that they mysteriously ended their suicide watch, just in time for him to die under mysterious circumstances. We have been told one of those guards has made a deal to tell us just what happened, but then we hear nothing more. We hear about damaging information about Obama’s presidency that is supposed to END Obama’s ability to make anything happen. And we hear that, over and over—then—nothing. We hear about many things that are “about to happen” to help Trump “drain the swamp,” but then—again—nothing. Nothing ever really happens, unless somebody forces it to happen. Probably Trump will make it happen. Then the “left comes unglued” and screams “politics.” The closer we get to any real revelations, the more the left screams “unfair.” What are they hiding? What do they not want us to uncover? “Methinks they doth protest too much.” In any case, the left has had “the fix in” for many years, and that makes investigating their operations very difficult—and that’s the way they want it. (Just common sense)

Even Students Want It

Churches are demanding armed security. Teachers are demanding the right to bring their legally-carried guns to school; even school administrators in many places are demanding it, too. Now school students have “joined the chorus” of those wishing to have hidden armed security any way they can. Armed teachers, as well as other members of school staff. Student Bradley Cooper got the beejezzuz scared out of him when there was a false “shooter scare” at his school. And that made his mind up for him. He wanted teachers to be allowed to bring their guns to school so he, and the other students, would be protected. At one time, the thought of allowing guns into schools and churches was unthinkable to even intelligent people. Today it is only unthinkable to those with little or no intelligence because it is the absolute BEST defense. But they refuse to budge. (Breitbart)

Self-Created Recession

The Dumocrats have long been predicting that we would have a recession under President Trump. Meanwhile Trump has been doing things that have unmistakably made the current economic boom so amazing, and lasting. Meanwhile, Dumocrats are still predicting a recession. They desperately say the booming economy is a “bubble” and that bubble is bound to burst, creating a recession to make the 2008 recession look like child’s play. We were still waiting, and waiting, for that to happen when the Coronavirus intervened, and this entire country began to “shut down” in response. This is a reaction that is way out of line. People are deathly afraid of the virus, that came out of communist China, as a result of their more lax cleanliness in general. Liberals will call me racist for saying that, but it’s not racist to tell the truth—and that’s what I do, while some people don’t like it. Tough turtle.

Truth is truth, whether or not people like it. So now we’re setting ourselves up for the recession the Dumocrats predicted. Not because of what Trump is doing, but in SPITE of it. But that will not make a difference to Dumocrats. They will blame that virus-induced recession on President Trump, as they have done with everything bad that has ever happened since he was elected. And many less intelligent people will believe them, and join in blaming Trump. But the coming recession is self-created, and unnecessary. It will not slow the progression of this Chinese produced disease, but it may alter the direction in which this nation moves as a result. Not because of Trump, but in spite of him. (Just common sense)

We're NOT "Divided!"

No more than usual, of course. Except for the Dumocrats’ “unhinged hatred” of President Trump. I don’t think I’ve ever sen a president that has been subjected to worse insults than has this president, And ALL are lies, designed to “divide us” more. Then when I hear people like “Mayor Pete” saying he’s there to stop the division,” and “unite us once again,” I have to laugh—and then vomit. He, and his pals, are the ones dividing us, and now they’re complaining about the division THEY’VE caused. This country’s government was DESIGNED to “divide us.” Without that division we would be a dictatorship. We’ve always been divided. We always will—hopefully. That is why they designed it with three separate, but equal branches. Legislative (Congress), Judicial (Supreme Court and lower courts), and executive (The President). That way, no single entity could “take over” and make all decisions without opposition when needed by an equal branch of government. To have a government with only one branch—the executive—making all the decisions and rules, is a dictatorship, which they didn’t want, They WANTED “division,” and we’ve had it ever since—and will continue to have it, no matter what the Dumocrats think they can do. If they do create a government without “division,” it WILL be a dictatorship—which is exactly what they want. (Just common sense)

Churches Are Now Targets

There was a time when nobody even considered allowing people to bring guns into a church, even if they were legally allowed to carry. That’s because they always considered a church a “place of peace and friendship,” and there was not only no reason to bring guns in, Not so today. After a number of fools have not only brought guns into churches, but have killed many people while they were worshiping their God. Now churches, themselves, are demanding “armed security” to protect their flocks. That doesn’t mean there will never again be any guns brought into those churches to kill the parishioners, it just means the prohibition on the law-abiding being armed there will cease, and anybody who brings his gun in to kill parishioners will likely meet a gun in the hands of one or more of the parishioners, as one did in Colorado Springs, Colorado, some time ago, when a tiny woman was there with her own gun and stopped a shooter cold. They CALLED her a “security guard,” but she was just a worshiper who was ASKED to bring her gun, just in case. In any case, this ONE GUN made all the difference. The shooter is dead, and only a couple of parishioners (who were in the parking lot) are dead. She saved the lives of all those in the church by shooting the gunman. (NBC News)