I Can't Believe the Stupidity!

In New York City, one of the most liberal cities in the country, they actually are seriously considering DISARMING the cops! Condemning many of them to an unnecessary death if they stay. And they are similarly considering it in other places, too. I can’t believe the abysmal stupidity of the politicians in these places. They’ve managed to disarm much of the law-abiding population, and now they want to disarm the cops that are working hard to keep people safe, which will surrender to the “bad guys,” who will NOT disarm. They will “run free,” killing, robbing, raping, and doing much violence, since there will not be an armed force to resist them. If I were a cop in New York, and those stupid politicians took my guns away, I would resign, effective immediately. The entire police force should resign, en masse, so they can stay alive. New York politicians need to find out how impossible it would be to recruit ONE intelligent, unarmed cop if that happened. (Just common sense)

"Free Things for All!"

That’s what the Dumocrats have always promised, in one way or another. Ever since that famous promise in the forties (I think) of “a chicken en every pot,” or even before that, the Dumocrats have always run on platforms of giving away other people’s money. But, of course, they never admit where that money is coming from. They mostly appeal to the lazy among us. People who would love to simply live at the expense of others, and to finance it, they LOOT those able and willing to work for a living. That is collectivism (socialism) in any man’s language, but they have always denied being socialist—until now. Liberal professors in college, and liberal teachers in lower schools have so effectively taught their young, impressionable students that “the world owes them a living,” and that “socialism will give it to them,” that they are “conditioned” to vote FOR anything socialist, when they reach the age where they can vote. And they have, at the same time, taught the producers of new wealth (those willing to work for a living) that it is “their duty” to provide money to “make things better for those less lucky in life.” It’s a load of bullsh-t, but they’ve perfected the methods of conditioning. (Legal Insurrection)

The Second Rules

New York State tried its best to strangle the NRA by CLAIMING it was “doing nasty things” by selling “carry insurance” to concealed carriers in the state. They also tried, through the Department of Financial Services, to stop other businesses from even doing any kind of business with the NRA. Fortunately, wiser heads intervened, and allowed the NRA’s suit against New York State to go forward. New York had arbitrarily decided NRA’s “Carry Guard” insurance was in violation of the law, and even had the temerity to cancel the policies of those who had already PAID for the coverage. The NRA suit was to correct that silly assumption. In the text of the suit, it was alleged that the State of New York had embarked on a campaign to “chill the free speech” of the NRA. They even had the temerity to impose million dollar fines on those companies who had dealings with the NRA. Which is a clear violation of the law in that it attempted to restrain companies from doing lawful business with the NRA. The fact is, the NRA is a legal entity, and doing business with them is not a crime, and is protected by law. New York State attempted to restrict them from doing legal business, and hopefully will ultimately be restrained—and PUNISHED for that. (Breitbart)

"Swamp Investigates Investigators

Only in DC do the criminals get to "investigate" the honest people. Those being President Trump and his associates. The swamp being every politician who takes swipes at Trump without any kind of evidence, and institutes “investigations” in search of a crime—which they have not found, in almost three years of trying. The best known swamp members are Jerry (Nads) Nadler, Adam (Pencil Neck) Schiff, and Nancy Peelosi. There are many more, who I will not name because I don’t want to give them any publicity. All their “investigations” find out is that there is nothing in Trump’s past, anywhere, that will give them an excuse to impeach him. But impeach him they will, as a last resort to keep him from being re-elected, a forlorn hope, at best. All their “investigations” are for is to “muddy the waters” and discredit (if they can) anything President Trump says, or does, hopefully keeping him from uncovering their crimes. Schiff changes the rules daily in all his “committee hearings” to make the “testimony” look as bad as possible for President Trump. The most recent outrage is that “closed door hearing” to keep us from knowing what the victim really said, while they tell us what they want us to believe he said. (Just common sense)

Bigot, Racist, Liar

Hypocrite, sexual predator, even rapist. Dumocrats call him all these, and more. But there is no proof of any of those things. They just accuse him of them without any kind of proof, and think Americans have to believe them. I have seen other presidents maligned by their opponents, but never like this. Dumocrats block his every attempt to make things better on our southern border, and then blame Trump for not getting things done there. When he failed to militarily attack Iran for shooting down one of our drones, they criticized him for that. If he HAD militarily attacked them, he would be attacked as a “war-monger.” He will be criticized for everything he does, without exception. Even if what he does is something the Dumocrats have been pressing for, for ages. If he does it, they hate it. It’s the “Trump Derangement Syndrome,” illustrated. They think they can drive his approval numbers down so far that he will be defeated in 2020. And if not, they plan to attempt to impeach him for SOMETHING. They haven’t yet decided for what. But they’ve failed, even in that. His approval numbers with the people who COUNT, the American electorate, have never been higher. And still rising. The Dumocrats see DOOM coming, and they’re fighting it, “tooth and nail.” (Just common sense)

Gun Laws Help Criminals

Politicians insist that they’re only interested in “gun safety,” and “keeping guns out of the hands of criminals,” but that’s a lie. Every one of the laws they have voted into effect, ONLY apply to people who OBEY laws. Criminals, by definition, do NOT obey laws. So why, tell me, do they expect a criminal will suddenly decide to obey a silly little law like that when they are contemplating committing much more serious crimes? All their laws do is keep guns out of the hands of the law-abiding, so as to make it easier for the criminals to victimize them. Some of their laws not only don’t work, they ENCOURAGE criminals. “Gun-free zones,” for instance. Mass shooters who have been caught, willingly tell you they SEEK OUT “gun-free zones” because they can be pretty sure there will not be any guns in the hands of the law-abiding, who are their intended victims. Background checks only work if a gun used in a crime was bought legally. Since most criminals get their guns illegally, those laws do not apply to them. The basic flaw in all their laws is that they depend on LAWBREAKERS to OBEY them, and this is a forlorn hope. It just makes life easier for the illegally-armed criminals. (Just common sense)

"President Pencil Neck?"

I think that’s his ultimate goal. He hopes first to bamboozle us enough to actually get rid of President Trump, then work his way into a place where he can be “appointed” president. Then he hopes he can become “president for life.” It’s a pipe dream, and there’s no way it could ever happen. The other Dumocrats want to impeach and remove Trump, then appoint Nancy Peelosi (or Hillary) to be VP. Then impeach and remove Pence, so then Nancy will be president. Coup successful. Then find a way to get rid of Peelosi after appointing "Pendil Neck as VP. Think that’s outlandish and can never happen? Maybe. But that’s the way the Dumocrats think. They hope to gain the top spot any way they can. Legal or illegal, as long as it works. That’s who the Dumocrats are. Then they will continue “stacking the courts” with liberal judges. Something trump has been quickly reversing by appointing hundreds of constitutionalists to courts, nationwide. This, along with his Supreme Court appointments will assure even-handedness in the courts for years to come. Pencil Neck is fast losing any credibility he might have once had as he goes about breaking every rule of jurisprudence in his secretive efforts to impeach President Trump. (Just common sense)

Politicians Are Stupid!

I was aghast when I heard Dumocrat (now former) presidential candidate Hickenpooper say that he never thought his government would “take children from their parent’s arms, keep them in cages, and even adopt them.” I couldn’t believe he was that STUPID. The “Child Protective Services” (CPS) in every state, including his own state, does exactly that, every day, including weekends, with, and WITHOUT cause. They may not keep them in cages, but they do everything they can to keep the parents from ever seeing them again. They did it to me in Indianapolis when two of my sons were just toddlers. They took them from my ex-wife, charged her with child neglect, which they couldn’t prove. Charges were dropped. But they kept the kids. I tried to get custody, but after a sham “inspection” of my home, in which I had several other happy kids, in another state, that was refused. I haven’t seen, nor heard from them since. They would both be approaching 50 today, and they might as well be dead. Maybe they are. I don’t know. CPS never tells a parent when their children die. One last thing. I was never even charged with a crime. They just thought I would have too many kids for the number of bedrooms in my house. They tried the same thing in Colorado on my only remaining son’s kids, but we beat them, since I knew all their tricks and could advise my son on how to avoid them. We cost them $50,000.00 MORE than they got from the feds, so after that, we were “hands off” to them. Thank God. (Just common sense)

Banning Guns Is Futile

Politicians, nationwide, are bent on one thing” to DISARM all Americans, in one way or another. If they can’t just ban guns because of that pesky ol’ Constitution, they do everything they can to make it difficult to buy a gun—and if you actually manage to buy one, they make it difficult to get ammunition—which makes the gun in your hand just a lump of metal, only good for throwing at an ILLEGALLY-armed criminal. Then if you do actually find some ammunition you can buy, there’s the insurance that want to force you to buy. Special insurance, that is extra expensive, and is purposely made hard to get. If you manage to get that, then you find that there are “gun-free zones” all over the place. Places where you cannot, by law, or rules, bring your gun, even if you managed to jump through all the hoops they place on it and actually have a concealed carry permit. It is becoming more and more obvious, as the “authorities” find more and more new ways to prevent you from getting a gun with which to defend yourself from the criminals who IGNORE their laws, that their purpose is to get rid of the concept of self defense, altogether. And the only reason they would do that is to make it easier on their thugs, who will be coming to take your money and property, and don’t want to meet a gun in your hand when they do. Think about that. None of what they do takes guns out of the hands of criminals, only you. (Just common sense)

Unconstitutional Prosecution

This country is different from any other in the world, in that we are GUARANTEED freedom of speech, even if we don’t agree with it, or it is offensive to many. Yes, there are laws against LYING in public about someone, in print, or by voice—if the lie can be proved. But to arrest somebody and put him in JAIL for stating his or her political views is absolutely unconstitutional. But it is being done by officious politicians and bureaucrats in several places, and it is ILLEGAL since it is a constitutional violation. But officious “authorities” are doing it, because the Supreme Court has not had its say about it. By the time that happens, the damage will have been done. The victim will have become, on paper, a felon, or whatever kind of miscreant their misuse of the law says he/she is. That will affect his/her ability to get a job, credit, and many other things denied to “miscreants.” That includes being able to get a gun for self defense if he/she needs it. At the University of Connecticut (solid liberal country), two students have been JAILED for making racial slurs. Now, I don’t agree that racial slurs are a good thing, but they fall under that “even if I don’t agree” thing. Yes, shun them. Do many other things, but do NOT put them in jail! Freedom of speech is freedom of speech, even if you hate what is being said. You can say what it takes to refute what is said if you disagree, but putting people in JAIL for saying something is EVIL. And liberals want to have laws made to allow it for global warming/climate change deniers, among other things. Just because they don’t agree with them and can’t win in a debate. (Legal Insurrection)

Same Ol' Same Ol'

Rush Limbaugh thought it was necessary for him to sit through the “2 HOURS’ HATE” session they called “the first half” of the Dumocrat Presidential Candidate’s Debates so he could be properly prepared for his program, but it actually wasn’t necessary for him to subject himself to this awful form of torture. If you’re as old as he is, you’ve seen it all before. In every election, anywhere in the land. The only thing new is that they have stopped saying they are not socialists. They have always spent most of their time giving away other people’s money and promising to do things to hurt large corporations, although after they get elected, nothing ever happens. Never mind that large corporations are what is responsible for the booming economy we are now experiencing. They are the employers who keep paying us to work for them, and if they weren’t there, we’d all go broke. Example: the first thing Bill Clinton did was “put a cap” of a million dollars a year on what corporations paid their top executives. So immediately, the corporations started giving their top executives large BONUSES, which weren’t covered by that law. Nothing changed. Clinton still “hobnobbed” with their top executives, and raised money from them. Truth is, they’re “in on the scam” and know what’s going on. Nothing ever changes. (Just common sense)

"It'll Save 2,000 Lives!"

One of the flimsiest claims by anti-gun fools is that a total gun ban would save “only” 2,000 lives. Anti-gun fools always quote that inflated number of 32,000 people killed by guns each year. Of course, what they don’t tell you is their “list” includes all the justified shootings by police officers, as well as suicides, plus all private citizens’ use of guns in self defense. Again, what they don’t tell you is that if somebody really wants to commit suicide and can’t get a gun, they’ll use something else. So making it harder to get a gun isn’t going to make much of a difference, there. Then there’s the fact—the unalterable fact-- that making laws against guns does not stop an evil-doer from getting his/her guns. All it does is force him/her into the ILLEGAL gun market, which is all around us. Where all CRIMINALS get their guns. And those who buy their guns illegally, or just STEAL them, never stand for a background check. Every one of their “common sense laws” against guns are USELESS in keeping guns out of the hands of those who shouldn’t have them. All they do is make it easier for the miscreants to victimize the law-abiding with their illegal guns, since the law-abiding DO obey laws, while the miscreants do NOT. (Gun Mart)

The Ongoing Coup Attempt

There is an ongoing attempt at a coup, in which a duly elected president is to be torn from his lawful office and returned to private life. There is no legal reason for this. He has done no wrong, except to have beaten the best (or worst) the Dumocrats could do to defeat him. For that, they hate him with a passion. To make things worse, he doesn’t operate the same ways that normal politicians do. They can’t predict what he will do in any situation and therefore he defeats them at every turn, making them madder. Worse yet again, he regularly does things the Dumocrats could not do, or would not do. He has brought the economy back to high levels, something Obama defended his inability to do by telling us “the good days are gone,” and we’d better get used to it. Obama also told us the jobs that went overseas under his administration were gone forever, and we’d better get used to that, too. Along with that, low unemployment rates were a “thing of the past.” But they were NOT. Unemployment is now down in the 3% level, something Obama never dreamed possible. And for that they’d love to have him executed—and several Dumocrats have even expressed that wish. They have “investigated” him in every way possible, and could not find anything with which to dispense with him. Now they are faced with the possibility of another humiliating defeat in the 2020 presidential elections and hope the very existence of an illegal “impeachment inquiry” DURING the 2019 elections will sufficiently fool the electorate that they will not re-elect him. They are wrong. He is a “juggernaut” they will never defeat, and that frightens them, since he promised to “drain the swamp,” and is doing it. (Just common sense)

Trump Is NOT Divisive!

He is no more divisive than would be any opposing politician to the opposition. The biggest obstacle to getting anything done in DC is the Dumocrat Party, which is determined to keep Trump from doing as many things as they can, while blaming him for not getting some things done. The biggest thing they’re criticizing President Trump for is “not keeping his promise to build the wall,” even though he has made a lot of progress in doing just that, in spite of the solid opposition to his every effort, including filing suits to stop his progress every chance they get. “Divisive?” He is no more “divisive” than any politician would be to those who oppose him, while the Dumocrats are as divisive as they come. It amazes me how Dumocrats accuse their opposition of what they, themselves, are doing, and the public sometimes buys it. Division was BUILT IN to the American political system when they created the “two-party system.” Did anybody think both parties would go for the same goals? And the creation of three equal houses of government GUARANTEED “division.” Lack of division means a dictator, and the Founders wanted to stop that, in it’s tracks. And they succeeded. (Just common sense)

How Stupid ARE They?

The anti-gun fools are stupid. Totally stupid. Laws to keep guns out of the hands of criminals and other miscreants DO NOT WORK. They have to know this. But they insist on making them, anyway. People who want to commit serious crimes just IGNORE their silly laws. And they don’t usually stand for background checks because they get their guns illegally—thus bypassing that “requirement.” When you buy a gun from someone out of the trunk of his car in a back alley somewhere, or STEAL it, no background check is possible, or required. “Gun-free zones” merely provide wannabe mass shooters with a “target rich environment,” because they can be pretty sure law-abiding people who OBEY laws will not bring their guns there. Thus, they will be HELPLESS to defend themselves against the ILLEGAL GUNS the criminals bring, because they IGNORE those restrictions. They’re bent on bloody murder, so why should they care about a silly little law that says they can’t be armed in those “zones?” The entire idea that you can get rid of gun violence by banning or limiting guns is a fool’s idea, promoted by fools. Yet gullible lawmakers “buckle under” to them and make more and more useless laws that criminals just IGNORE. (Just common sense)

GOP Finally Fighting Back

The Dumocrats have pretty much had it their own way for the last almost three years as they conducted “investigation after investigation” into President Trump, with no results. They’d like to find ANYTHING they can use to unseat him before he is able to fully achieve his major promise, to “drain the swamp,” but after three years of trying, they have come up with NOTHING. Because there is nothing there. Trump seems to be something they just don’t understand, a “squeaky clean” politician. They figure every politician has something they can use to “get rid of him” if they want to. After all, isn’t that true with most Dumocrats? “Pencil Neck” Schiff is now holding SECRET hearings, behind closed doors, in his effort to get rid of Trump before Trump can find out what he is hiding, and Republicans finally have had enough, and “stormed” the meeting, forcing “Pencil Neck” to flee. They claim the only reason they did that is they have “run out of options.” But nothing could be further from the truth. They’re tired of Schiff’s high-handed tactics and decided to take a stand, letting the world see what he’s up to. (Daily Caller)

Forget It, Hillary!

There are a number of liberals (Dumocrats all) who think they can get rid of Donald Trump in such a fashion that will elevate the loser in the last presidential election, Hillary Clinton, to the highest office in the land. It ain’t agonna happen, people! Even if you do manage to prove that Trump “colluded with the Russians” to get elected (not likely) and, somehow get him removed from office because of it, Hillary is NOT in the line of succession to the presidency. Mike Pence would be our next president. Hillary might even have the audacity to run for president again, ignoring what the American people have told her twice in the past, that “we don’t want you!” And gullible Dumocrats might even get behind her effort. But NOBODY is going to beat President Trump in his effort at re-election. He has too many good things in his “win” list for that, even if the liberal media won’t report it. The electorate knows it, no matter how hard the liberal media has worked to hide it. There’s a long list of gullible Dumocrats who think they can beat him, and they are all, each and every one of them, going to feel the disappointment Hillary has felt, twice in her life. (Just common sense)

"I Smell BS!"

They did a “study” about “pediatric gun victims.” Which included results from “children” up to age 19. That doesn’t sound much like “children” to me. Their results included injuries and deaths from GANG shootings. Gang members may be the same AGE as SOME children, but the very fact that most of them carry their own guns, and shoot back, makes them ADULTS, to anybody who has a scintilla of INTELLIGENCE. The very fact that these gang members are included in this “study” makes its result very questionable, in my estimation. Even phony. This is how the anti-gun fools keep their effort to disarm all Americans, making them “sitting ducks” for those with ILLEGAL guns. They SAY they are concerned with “gun safety.” They are NOT. They are concerned with having the ability to tell you that you CANNOT own and carry the means to self defense, a gun. What they are really doing, and which they deny, is destroying the very concept of self defense. (Eureka Alert)

Giving Away Other People's Money

The Dumocrats are making big promises as to what they’re going to give away if they somehow get elected president in 2020. They’re good at giving away other people’s money, never their own. They always seem to find a way to exempt themselves from the things they wish on the rest of us. A good example if health care. They wish Obamacare on the rest of us, but Congresspeople have their own “golden” health care system that is a helluva lot better than anything they wish on us. It’s like the “congressional banking system” of old, where a Member of Congress could make withdrawals without having any money in there. They took full advantage of it until it was discovered, and shut down by people who were more honest. What all the Dumocrat presidential candidates are promising is SOCIALISM, even though they protest mightily, and claim it isn’t. But socialism is taking from the earner and giving to those who do not earn, whatever they call it. Their brand of socialism is called “progressivism,” an unlikely name for a system of theft by government. (Just common sense)

"MAGA Hats" Banned?

You can always tell what frightens Dumocrats. They’ll tell you by wanting to ban them. Now they want to ban Trump’s “MAGA Hats because they frighten them. They’re deathly afraid of people who are strong enough to insist on wearing such symbols in spite of the fact that they frighten Dumocrats so much they want to violently attack people for wearing them. Anything Dumocrats don’t like, or which frightens them, they want to ban. They really think they have the power to ban things their opposition holds dear. That this reveals the fact that they think they have total power doesn’t even occur to them. They call the GOP the “party of violence,” but the real party of violence is the Dumocrat Party, and they prove it every time they violently attack anybody wearing this hat, or otherwise show support for President Trump. They resent the very suggestion that the Dumocrats CRATED the Ku Klux Klan (KKK), though that is an unalterable fact. And today they have created ANTIFA, which is today’s KKK, although it doesn’t go after blacks, it goes after anybody they don’t like. Private property owners have the right to refuse entry to anybody they wish, on any grounds except their skin color or other things that constitute an obvious effort to insult others or are discriminatory. But government does not have the right to ban the wearing of a symbol of one political party because the other does not like it and they cower before it. (Washington Examiner)

Just Stupid, Or What?

That’s the question I have about the anti-gun fools who think all they have to do is make a law against criminals carrying guns, and they’ll stop. That’s a stupid assumption. “Gun-free zones” offer a “target-rich” area for potential mass shooters, allowing them to be pretty sure there will be no law-abiding people there who are armed and able to resist them, because they DO obey the law—which is more than I can say for criminals, who obey NO laws. So what makes the anti-gun fools think they will obey their laws? That’s the basic flaw in their MAKING of laws against criminals carrying guns. They expect a criminal, who violates the law every day, to somehow decide to obey their laws, when their laws make it so much easier for the criminal to victimize the law-abiding, who OBEY their laws. Each and every mass shooting has occurred IN a “gun-free zone.” They have to know that. So why do they keep creating them? Is there something in the air that makes them stupid? Something to which intelligent people are immune? I’ve toyed with the idea that they just want to disarm all Americans to facilitate a later looting of their property and money by politicians, who don’t want their minions to meet a gun in the hand of their intended victim. Am I right? Or is there some other reason for their stupidity—or are they just plain STUPID? (Just common sense)

Men & Women Are Different!

That is a fact that cannot be denied by intelligent people. You have only to look between their legs to decide, and that is done at birth. If the baby has a penis, it is MALE. A vagina, it is FEMALE. It’s not a matter of “settled science,” it is common sense. Sex is NOT “assigned” at birth, it is DISCOVERED. Liberal can claim all kinds of exceptions to this, but they are WRONG. They are DELUDED if they actually believe this lie. But I don’t think they do. Insisting there are more than two sexes is a CON. One designed to create more “dissension in the ranks.” Dividing us up makes it a lot easier to control us as we fight among ourselves, rather than look at the real issues. Most of what they do is designed to get us to fight among ourselves and divert out attention from what they are doing to us. Look at the so-called “white privilege” scam. They make up all kinds of things that are supposed to represent “white privilege.” This is to CREATE racism against whites, by blacks. “Reverse racism,” and is again an attempt to make us fight against each other, rather than see what they’re doing to us. All their scams and schemes are designed to divide us into different groups so we will not be able to “team up” against them. (American Thinker)

Trump Rape Accusation

Lovelorn columnist E. Jean Carroll has accused President Trump of a rape attempt 20 years ago in a department store changing room. But she says she will not “bring charges” against him because it would not be fair to the women who are being raped on our southern border, thus making it impossible for Trump to demand evidence of the supposed rape attempt while putting it out there for the public to assume the truth or non-truth of the matter. Trump says he doesn’t know her and has never met her, which she counters with a photograph of him in a “meet and greet” line with his wife at his side. Not mentioned is that a president will shake hands with many people in his life, while actually KNOWING none of them. It’s amazing to me that people like this completely discount the fact that, with all his money, Trump can have the pick of beautiful women, which makes it doubtful that he would find it necessary to rape anybody. The fact that she just accuses him while refusing to bring charges legally, blocks any attempt from him to defend himself from being “judged” by the pubic without a defense. Personally, I think it is a publicity stunt on her part, to revive a “flagging” career. (Western Journal)

Polling Place Gun Bans

Missoula, Montana had a problem: most of the polling places were at schools, which are already “gun-free zones.” So no guns can be brought there by law. But not all polling places were in schools, so people could bring their guns there. So they made a law banning guns in ALL polling places. Problem solved. Or is it? What about those who contemplate mass murder, and so aren’t concerned about violating a silly little law telling them they can’t bring their guns? Politicians are so naive. They think that, all they have to do is make a law, and that “solves the problem.” Often it doesn’t. This is one place where it does NOT. West Palm Beach, Florida even went so far as to post a sign saying “Designated No Crime Zone,” and they figured that would take care of the crime problem. It did NOT. Criminals continued to commit crimes. Crimes that were already against the law. Laws they routinely IGNORE. Just as they will ignore ANY law that says they cannot bring their guns into a certain area. (American Military News)

Should Trump Be Impeached?

That’s a question being asked in many places, but it’s really a stupid question. Nobody can come up with a real reason TO impeach him. You don’t impeach a president that has brought the economy back from the very bottom, and raised it to the top. Nor one that has brought manufacturing jobs Obama told us were “gone forever” back to lower the unemployment rate to record lows. You don’t impeach a man who has caused the stock market to attain record highs, several times, nor a man who has won every major battle in which he has found himself as president, in spite of the most complete opposition ever seen from Dumocrats. Not unless you’re just hunting for a reason, ANY reason, to impeach him, whether he’s doing well or not, just because you don’t like him and are still smarting from the abysmal defeat he dealt you in 2016. Trump hasn’t always done the right thing, but he has most of the time. He is the best thing to happen to this country since Ronald Reagan, and it would be a crime to impeach him. But the Dumocrats are determined to do it, whether there is a good reason, or not. (Just common sense)

"Queering God"

There’s a concentrated effort right now to destroy the Christian religion while building up the Muslim “religion.” While at the same time attempting to legitimize the gay lifestyle. “It provides a feminist and queer perspective of the Bible, while also exploring God’s gender identity.” I didn’t originate those words, they come right out of the article telling us about this outrage, being taught at Swarthmore College, which has a tuition of $54,000.00 to teach this drivel to our impressionable children. One of the students says, “This means spreading awareness and getting people to action through taking courses like this.” But I suspect it is, in addition to cheapening the Christian religion, is more about creating more opportunities for gays to find sex. Swarthmore also teaches a course called, “Queering the Bible,” which is aimed at the same students and is an effort at the same thing. Other colleges have courses fabricating something called “white privilege,” but which is, in actuality, an effort to CREATE racism against white people. More of what liberals in our schools want to teach. At the same time liberals do everything they can to legitimize the Muslim “religion” in America, calling all opposition to that, “Islamaphobia,” a made-up word to impute “mental aberration” into that opposition. (Legal Insurrection)

"Logic-Free Zones"

Anybody who wants to stop, or even slow down “gun violence” in this country should oppose “gun-free zones” with everything he/she has. They do not work as advertised. All they do is give a would-be mass shooter a gift: a place where he/she can go and be pretty sure none of the law-abiding there will be armed, and able to resist him/her. Every single mass shooting, so far, has occurred IN a “gun-free zone.” Mass shooters who have been caught freely tell us that they SEEK OUT a “gun-free zone” in which to shoot up the place because they figure there will be no guns there but theirs. The recent killings in a Jewish synagogue are a point in fact: this synagogue IS a “gun-free zone.” The stories of robberies and killings in the parking lots, or inside “big box stores” are rife. Right up the street from where I live, a man killed several people at a WalMart last year. So why do the anti-gun fools insist on creating as many “gun-free zones” as they can? I don’t know—they HAVE TO know they don’t work. Maybe they just want to destroy the very concept of self defense. They can’t all be that stupid. There must be something else driving them. What we need is a law BANNING “gun-free zones” because they create a “free shooting area” in which a gunman can do his dirty work without fear of being shot, himself, until the cops (finally) arrive, with their guns. (Crime Prevention Research Center)

Messing With Us

One reason I have differences with Muslims is because they go out of their way to try and change how we do things in this country to emulate how they were in the countries they LEFT to come here. If they don’t like it here, they should go back to a country they do like, and then wipe the dust of this country off their shoes—if they wear any. I say this in response to a bunch of Muslims in Katy, Texas, who MOVED IN NEXT TO A PIG FARMER and then made trouble for him because he raised pigs—which they don’t like. They had to know there was a pig farmer next to their new property. So why did they even MOVE there? So they could hassle him? It pains me when I see Muslims trying to force non-Muslims to do their bidding—which they have no right to do. If they don’t like that pig farm, THEY should be the ones to move. That pig farmer told them to “pound sand,” and started holding pig races (on HIS property) every Friday (a Muslim religious day of prayer). They’ll probably send somebody to kill him. That’s how they usually handle opposition to their wishes. (Red Right Videos)

"Death Penalty NO"

Killing helpless babies, YES. That’s what Dumocrat presidential candidate Butt-giggle believes in. He is against the death penalty for terrorists, but is in favor of abortion, the murder of innocent babies, still in the womb (mostly). That’s a pretty twisted combination of wishes. If you ask me. But I’m not surprised. Liberals usually want strange things. Mostly things that tend to increase their power. He has proposed what he calls his “Douglass Plan, named after Frederick Douglass, which would do many things, including expunging the records of felons who committed a crime after getting them released from prison, purposely make his laws retroactive, which is a clear violation of the Constitution. His laws would call for the end of solitary confinement, private prisons, and the death penalty. Basically, he wants to stop punishing criminals. Period. He also thinks we put too many black people in prison. Never mind more black people commit crimes than whit people. On abortion, he “trusts women to draw the line.” They haven’t “drawn it” very well up to now, having MURDERED millions of helpless, innocent infants, sometimes for no reason except they don’t want to carry it or spend 18 years raising it. (Real American Pundit)

Making It Obvious

How more obvious could you be that the “studies” you plan will favor the gun control crowd than to invite Gabby Giffords, one of the loudest mouths in favor of that useless “gun control” to speak at your opening? They call it the “Gun Violence Research Center,” and they got a $2 million dollar grant, from whom they don’t say in this article. That bullet must have really scrambled Giffords’ brain, because she just can’t understand that the laws she fosters do NOTHING to stop, nor even slow down, “gun violence.” In fact, they make it worse by disarming the law-abiding, while lawbreakers just IGNORE the laws she gets made, and do their shootings, anyway. They SAY their work doesn’t involve politics, but, in fact, it’s NOTHING BUT politics. They don’t say from whom the $2 million came, but I’ll bet it came from somebody with an “ax to grind” about “gun laws,” and that their “research” will predictably push the making of even more useless “gun laws,” Instead of concentrating on things that will actually WORK to “reduce gun violence.” Banning guns certainly has NOT. People like Gabby Giffords should know these laws do NOTHING, but she apparently does not. And neither do those who MAKE those laws. Or they just have an ulterior motive. (Tap Into Nutley)

To Fool the Public

Today’s media, which is being run by liberals for the most part, lies to you every day. “The proof is in the pudding,” as they say. We usually don’t catch them at it, but in this case it is so obvious that there is no mistaking it. The other night they ran a “story” about the Turkish “invasion of Syria,” and used footage of the “Knob Creek Machine Gun Shoot” to illustrate it, claiming it was footage of the Turkish killing civilians. This is not to say the entire feature was a lie. The Kurds are suffering greatly at the hands of the Turks. But to pass off a completely safe organized shoot at a shooting range as footage of the “Turkish massacre of the Kurds” is criminal if it was done on purpose, something we’ll never know for sure. At the very least, it shows a complete failure of “vetting” of the reports they run. At the worst, it is an attempt, by the liberals running things there, to make President Trump look even worse than usual. In any case, it is “fake news” at its worst. (Truth About Guns)

"Lead the Horse to Water..."

This is an example of a politician thinking he/she is the "boss of everybody." Somebody needed to tell Oregon’s lefty governor that the cops are not her personal “enforcers.” They are bound by laws, and those laws do not allow them to arrest lawmakers and force them to vote for her fool global warming damned foolishness. And I guarantee you if they try it, and bring those lawmakers back to the capital at the point of a gun, she will have open warfare. She might be able to force them to vote, but not to vote the way she wants. And if I’m reading things right, she may be precipitating a shooting war between her and her elected legislators—over whom she is NOT the boss. And I guarantee you if she does manage to force them to the capital to vote, they will vote AGAINST want she wants, en bloc. You don’t make phony threats of police action that would be against the law if you’re smart. So I guess that pretty much tells us about the intelligence—or lack of it—on the part of this governor. But then she’s a lefty, so she can’t be very intelligent. I think she needs to be recalled. (Conservative Tribune)