Death Penalty Case

If there ever was a “death penalty case,” the Ft. Hood murder case is it. An Army major went on base and killed twelve people who were disarmed by law while on base. Gun laws were obeyed by all but ONE PERSON: the shooter. How do “gun safety laws” that prevent honest people from being armed in self defense (against such people who do not obey the law) make us safer? Has there ever been a case where a mass shooter went into a gun show where everybody is armed and try (successfully) to shoot a bunch of people? A church in Colorado had ONE PERSON who was armed when a shooter came in to shoot a bunch of people. She shot him and he killed himself after killing only two people. If the principal at Columbine High School had been armed, he could have stopped the mass shooting in his school before 13 people were killed by putting a couple in the head of one of the shooters when he came upon him from behind while he was shooting people. But no, no guns are allowed in schools except in the hands of a uniformed (and easily ambushed and killed first) cop. They might as well put up a sign saying, "NO GUNS HERE, COME ON IN AND KILL US!" “Gun safety law” promoters have a systemic flaw in their thinking. They think CRIMINALS, who don’t obey laws, will obey a law that says they can’t be armed. I’ve said this many times, but nobody (who counts) listens. (ABC World News)