Wednesday, January 21, 2009
Does Iraq Make Bush a "Failed President?"
Not in the slightest. Iraq is a “bad war” only in the imagination of certain liberals, to whom ANY war is a “bad war.” Makes me wonder what they’d do if I walked up and punched one of them in the nose. He’d probably hit me back. Remember, these are the same people who think a CRIMINAL, who doesn’t OBEY laws, will obey one that says he can’t be armed. These are the people who want to HURT “big business,” but who are giving big business BILLIONS of dollars to keep them from going OUT of business, in a “tacit admission” that “big business” making money is important to the rest of us (something they’ll deny to their dying day). Remember: If Bush did nothing else right (and he did many things right), he kept us safe for his entire time in office after 9/11. The terrorists were NOT able to attack us on our own ground again after 9/11. They were too busy keeping their rear-ends from being shot off in Iraq and Afghanistan. (One News Now/Larry Elder)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
I can't understand why anyone would be foolish enough to buy into the "Bush kept us safe line". Wasn't he president before 9/11, too? Why does hew get to start "keeping us safe" after we've been attacked? Why would anyone think he stopped attacks after 9/11 when at no time in our history we have been attacked twice in an eight year period. It has never happened before. Why should someone be praised for stopping something that has never happened before. Logic says we would have not been attack. It took over eight years for the terrorists to repeat a flawed attempt and promised to bring the towers down. Bush has been the biggest failure as a president we've had in my 50 years of politics. This is just a lame attempt to put a false face on a clown.
Anon: I can't understand people who DON'T. It's so obvious I'm talking about AFTER the Islamic terrorists revealed themselves, I shouldn't have to say it. Just because we haven't been attacked twice doesn't mean we won't be. Just because we've never had people fly our planes into buildings (before 9/11), does that mean we won't? This isn't a "failure." You're not so smart if you think it is. Frankly, I think you're reading the wrong blogs. You should be reading those ignorant LIBERAL blogs where they agree with you.
Post a Comment