Tuesday, September 30, 2008

More Obama Censorship

Obama is against self-defense. He thinks we should just let illegally armed criminals kill us and hurt us without fighting back. And to that end, he wants NRA ads to be BANNED because he's afraid such ads will "influence" too many people away from his election as president. "Earlier this week, the National Rifle Association's Political Victory Fund released a series of radio and television spots to educate gun owners and sportsmen about Barack Obama's longstanding anti-gun record. In response to the NRA-PVF ads, a clearly panicked Obama campaign and the Democratic National Committee (DNC) are doing everything they can to hide Obama's real record by mounting a coordinated assault on the First Amendment. They have gone to desperate and outrageous lengths to try to silence your NRA by bullying media outlets with threats of lawsuits if they run NRA-PVF's ads. The Obama camp is particularly angry with an NRA ad entitled "Hunter" which lays out Obama's record on gun control." Obama actually thinks there are GROUNDS to sue these people for running NRA ads--or he knows there are NO grounds and means to bankrupt the stations. That's the kind of president he will be if elected. If you write or say ANYTHING against him, he will threaten you with expensive lawsuits he KNOWS he can't win, but which will cost you a LOT of money to fight. That's the "modus operandi" of Democrats. Sue their opponents, knowing they will have to pay their own legal costs. They've been doing it to gun makers for years, and several are now out of business because of it. What we need in this country is a law forcing people like him to pay the legal costs of people they sue and lose. That'll put an end to this scam. (News Max)

3 comments:

Michael Ejercito said...

Obama believes the NRA is a much more formidable opponent than John McCain.

We shall see iof that belief is justified.

Ray Thomas said...

Maybe. But in any case, it's a good thing the NRA isn't on his side. But then, why would they? It's amazing to me that people with such views are seriously considered for high public office. I wouldn't elect Obama dogcatcher.

Michael Ejercito said...

It's amazing to me that people with such views are seriously considered for high public office.
a lot of information about Obama was available last year.

Could not any of the other candidates have knocked him out of the primary? Were they really more incompetent than John Kerry was?