Violence As A Persuader

The liberal Dumbocrats have run out of arguments, even they lying ones, so now they’re threatening violence if they don’t get their way. And they’ve already committed enough violence that you know they’re serious. They’ve told us that if Trump replaced Ginsberg before the election, there will be burning, looting, and assaults. They’ve threatened the same if Trump gets re-elected. It gets boring. So why not just commit the violence (or try to) so we can put somebody in jail and shut them up. They really think they can keep those things from happening by threatening violence, but they don’t expect us to be ready to repel that violence and punish them for it. They really think their threats of violence will stop us from doing what’s right, but it will not. We will deal with their violence if, and when it comes—and they will suffer for it. What we need to do is “reply in kind.” If they try and commit violence on us, we need to get violent on them. It pains me to see a demonstrator getting in the face of a cop, knowing the cop has orders NOT to “reply in kind. That has to stop. The cops need to be “freed up” so they can simply “hit back” when a stupid “demonstrator” acts out. I’ve actually seen a “demonstrator” put his hands on a cop and not get arrested, as he should be. And it makes me sick. That needs to change. (Just common sense)