"Should Not Have Access"

The “powers that be” are saying the shooter in that Ft. Worth Texas church “should not have had access to a weapon” after his many “brushes with the law,” but he did. They “sluff it off” by saying, “None of that prevented him from getting a firearm.” Not mentioned is whether or not his acquisition of that firearm was legal. That important fact is just ignored. They ASSUME he got it legally, in spite of being a known violent criminal. Which I don’t believe is the case, since they do not release that information. If he did get it legally, they would have “shouted it to the skies.” But how do you control the acquisition of a gun by a felon ILLEGALLY? Who do you blame when such a man gets a gun illegally? Certainly him, but who else? You blame the anti-gun fools who make sure that, in most cases, there would be nobody there with their own guns to oppose him, so he can then kill as many people as he wants until the cops finally get there and do what could have been done instantly, as in this case, and shoot him down. (Washington Post)