"Peaceful Protest"

I have heard, far too often, a riot described by liberals as a “peaceful protest,” which is upheld by law. My absolute favorite is when a TV reporter talked about the “peaceful protest” behind him while over his shoulder you could see “demonstrators” setting a business on fire. That reminded me of the time when Saddam Hussein’s PR man told us, on camera, that they were okay, that America’s armed forces had been “beaten back,” while an American tank rolled by behind him. These things show me just how stupid some people can be. Liberals WANT to describe riots as “peaceful protests” so they can criticize the actions of the authorities in breaking up the riots. Just as they lie everywhere else to fool the public. They have to. If they were to accidentally tell the truth, they would ruin the plans of, and for themselves and other liberals. A “peaceful protest” is only peaceful if demonstrators are NOT breaking people’s property and hurting people. Setting fires to people’s property, and that sort of thing. In Seattle, violent rioters are now SUING the city because the cops had the temerity to actually DEFEND themselves against their violence. Violence committed while liberals described it as “peaceful.” (Just common sense)