Crooks Makin' Like Cops

Former NY mayor and current personal attorney to the president Rudy Giuliani has been subpoenaed by that infamous House committee because they claim he ADMITTED to asking a foreign government head for “dirt” on one of the president’s possible opponents in 2020. Something that still needs to be proven to have any weight, at all. But they don’t care bout that, they’ll use it, anyway. The chairman of that committee is “hip deep” in the mud of the swamp, and he is pretending to be the “cop” in the piece, subpoenaing a LAWYER to turn over privileged information. By doing so, he hopes to divert attention from his own mud stains on his actions. This whole thing is a screwed up mess, with the crooks makin’ like cops and hassling the good guys to mask their own illegal acts. Meanwhile they “moved the goalposts” by allowing hearsay for “whistleblowers” for the first time so they could use the phony ‘whistleblower” accusation against President Trump in their efforts at a coup to overthrow a legally elected president on specious “grounds.” (Spectrum News 9)

California Starts War With US

And, of course, the headline is, “Trump Starts War With California!” That’s always the way things are presented in the liberal news media these days. It doesn’t matter what Trump does, they find some way to twist it into something they can criticize. Actually, California started things when they started to allow their autos to follow requirement much less than the rest of the country, while Trump just stopped them from doing it. By so doing, they let them put out autos that were much less expensive than elsewhere in this country, and he stopped that. If that’s “starting a war with California,” I guess he’s guilty. But California, which is in the grips of a general war on the United States in everything they do, including telling the president of the United States he is not welcome there. A real stupidity. The president will go where he wishes, and when, regardless. California has declared itself a “sanctuary state,” which means they will NOT help a legal law enforcement body enforce laws that have been legally passed by the Congress. That’s just one of the provocations they have made. (Conservative Minute)

Anti-Gun Stupidity

The Penn Hills Girl’s Volleyball Team refused to play a game in Connellsville (I think it’s in New Jersey), thereby forfeiting the game. Why? All because there would be ARMED police officers there to “keep the peace.” What stupidity! Anti-gun fools are in panic! They do such stupid things as this, or calling the cops and putting a student IN JAIL for posting a PICTURE of a gun on Instagram. They just don’t understand (or pretend not to understand) the fact that cops at such games are mandatory in most places, and when there are cops there, they are armed. It is a REQUIREMENT for them to be armed. This is just as stupid as a restaurant refusing an armed cop service if he will not disarm himself and leave himself open to be killed by a disgruntled criminal who hates all cops, when he sees he is in uniform and unarmed, and has an ILLEGAL gun. What they will never understand is that a “good guy with a gun” is the best defense against a “bad guy with a gun,” as was proved when a thug opened fire on a bunch of senators as they practiced for a charity ball game. Were it not for those two armed cops who “took him down” before he could kill anybody, those senators might have lost a few of their number. Cops aren’t at those events to watch the action. They are there to PROTECT those in attendance. Anti-gun fools always blame the GUNS, not the people holding them. That’s wrong, and it shows a certain lack of intelligence. They think ALL GUNS are evil, when some guns can STOP evil from winning. (Trib Live)

Biden: "Investigate Trump!"

Former VP Joe Biden says “Trump deserves to be investigated” because he MIGHT have asked for an investigation of Biden’s son. My God, Joe, what the hell do you think has been happening steadily for the last almost three years? And finding NOTHING Trump ever did requiring action? Even by Dumocrats, who will act upon ANYTHING, legal or illegal, against President Trump, because he “trampled all over” Hillary in 2016? This is the most investigated president ever in history, Joe! What else do you want investigated? Did he use enough toilet paper the last tie he took a dump? Or did he use too much? What’s LEFT to be investigated about President Trump? Maybe Joe FORGOT that. He doesn’t seem to be able to remember much of anything these days. I can’t even remember all the gaffes “Ol’ Joe has made, just this week, most likely fueled by his faulty memory. And this guy thinks he has what it takes to BE president? Worse yet, the Dumocrat Party thinks he has what it takes to be president! (Just common sense)

Taking It Away

“Creepy Joe” Biden seems to think changing the Constitution is as easy as a politician making a decision and implementing it. It is not. To change the Constitution requires a 2/3 vote of the electorate, plus a 2/3 approval by the states. It cannot be done by a simple politician’s decision and action. Biden thinks he can change the Constitution, removing the First Amendment, at will, which shows further his total ignorance of how things work in government. I guess four years in the most useless office in DC fogged his thinking. Actually, that’s wrong. He said that in 1974. One can only hope he has learned better in the years since. By that way of thinking, even the Second Amendment would be in danger. But it’s not. It would take more political capital than he has to even get such a thing started—and the populace would stand up and be heard in ways they have never been heard before if he tried it. That’s one of the things that makes the Constitution a bulwark against would-be dictators (many of which are in the Dumocrat Party). (Viral Buzz)

Anti-Gun Fool Babbling

They don’t have much. They try to limit, or get rid of LEGAL guns when they KNOW that ownership and use of guns for self defense is GUARANTEED in the Constitution, which is the very BASIS for ALL our laws. Every law made MUST conform to it, and that makes their laws unconstitutional. So now they’re in a panic, seeing their fondest dreams wash “down the sewer.” Now they’re taking action against ANY depiction of a gun, anywhere. In Maine, a student posted a PICTURE of a gun on SNAPCHAT, and was arrested and charged with disorderly conduct for posting that picture. Never mind that, in itself, is a violation of the Constitution’s First Amendment. They don’t care about that. They know it will take a while to accomplish a reversal of their action while that student has to suffer from their action in the meantime. They know they will eventually be reversed, after somebody spends a lot of time and money to get the case before the Supreme Court. But they also know their actions will “send a message” to other pro-gun people that they will make trouble for themselves if they let people know about their wishes. The Founders made a big mistake when they prescribed NO PUNISHMENT for violating the Constitution, except for those laws that do so being reversed. (ABC 7)

Put Doctors Out of Business

That’s what “Crazy Bernie” wants to do now. He thinks doctors don’t have the right to earn money when they do work. Just as he believes college professors shouldn’t be able to earn a living doing what they do best. He wants to eliminate college tuition, which will take away all the money used to pay them for their work. And now he wants to do the same thing to doctors. It seems to be the only thing Bernie is good at: spending other people’s money while putting entire professions out of business and destroying America. He seems to think it will be an easy thing to finance such largess with other people’s money. Or just take away people’s ability to earn a living through the work they spent hundreds of thousands of dollars to go to college and learn how to do. Of course, he wants to make college free, so that’s supposed to work. But how are colleges supposed to keep the lights on and pay their employees? He doesn’t think about details. He only has “big ideas” and leaves the details to others. I’ve got a good idea. Let’s stop paying senators and representatives. Make them work free, like they want others to do. (Legal Insurrection)

"ANTIFA: Legitimate Protest Movement"

That’s what Vox reporter and Youtube censorship advocate Carlos Mazda thinks, anyway. Like the haters who supported the KKK for many years until the world began to realize they were nothing but a bunch of thugs and murderers, he is supporting yet another violent arm of the Dumocrat Party whose main activity, it seems, is to attack people with whom they do not agree politically. The Dumocrats, in addition to fielding these thugs, ADVOCATE violence against those who disagree with them. They have nothing else. They can’t answer us truthfully so they call us names, and sic rabid thugs like those in ANTIFA on us to shut us up. They just can’t allow us to speak our piece because people might realize we are right, and they are wrong. And they ARE wrong. This fool Mazda advocates violence personally, as well. Even in foreign countries like the UK, where he advocates throwing milkshakes on those he disagrees with. (Breitbart)

Showing Their True Colors

MOMS Against Guns (or something like that) has funded some ads in favor of birth control. I’ve always said the anti-gun fools just wanted to disarm law-abiding Americans to make them “easy targets” for people who IGNORE “gun laws” to get them killed, and this latest action proves it. They are IN FAVOR of KILLING, any way it can be done. Supporting the MURDER of millions of helpless, innocent INFANTS is very indicative of their wishes. Anti-gun fools can only get their way by LYING about their intentions. I guess they’ve figured out that the anti-gun stand isn’t a winning one, so they support candidates who they figure will vote for their anti-gun fool laws by supporting things they figure those politicians will also support. As they say in the linked article, “People who can only achieve their goals by lying are evil.” And that’s something I agree with, wholeheartedly. I can see no other reason why the anti-gun fools would continue to be so adamant about pushing laws that do NOTHING but disarm honest people and make them “easy targets” for criminals, including those who wear badges. They figure that, in the future, “government agents” will come for our property, and they don’t want to meet guns when they do, as they did when they tried to take over that ranch out west. (Joe Huffman)

"Packing" the Ninth Circuit

That’s what Dumocrats are calling it when President Trump exercises his constitutional duty to appoint federal judges, because he appoints judges that will actually follow the law and the Constitution, rather than use their own personal prejudices or the result of liberal brainwashing, as the judges appointed by Dumocrats do. They don’t like that, and anything they don’t like, they twist into something bad. President trump is “packing the Court” with judges who will rule the way they’re supposed to do, based on the CONSTITUTION. That’s what they’re supposed to do, and that’s ALL they’re supposed to do. Which will change things greatly in the next years, as they rule in a proper manner, unlike the way the liberal judges on that Court have done in recent years. The Ninth Circuit has suffered the derision of conservatives worldwide as they ruled, based on what liberals told them to base their rulings on, so they could use the court to get things done that they could not get done, if they followed the law. This is going to seriously cut into what the liberals can get done, and that makes them wet their pants. (Steadfast and Loyal)

Why Nancy Waited

Everybody has wondered why House Speaker (for a while, yet) Nancy Peelosi was against impeachment for so long, and why she capitulated right now. First of all, she was pinning her hopes on the many phony “investigations” Dumocrats have pursued, and after many tried, they have all flopped, because there isn’t anything in Trump’s past that would rise to the level of a “crime,” no matter how many times they have said so. They’ve tried everything they could think of, spent millions of taxpayer dollars in the attempt, and nothing stuck. So now they’re going after impeachment, just before the 2020 presidential elections. Does anybody notice the “time element” here? What better way to change the direction of everybody’s thinking just before an election than to put one of the candidates under an impeachment threat? Never mind they’ll never be able to remove him from office that way. Impeaching him, in no way is proof of any kind of a “crime.” It’s just an ACCUSATION. And it requires a “trial” in the Senate to remove him from office. Everybody, including Nancy, knows it isn’t going to work. He will not be removed from office. But this is a “last ditch effort” to influence the 2020 elections in the Dumocrats’ favor. One congressman even unwittingly ADMITTED that. He said, “We must impeach him so he won’t be re-elected in 2020. (Just common sense)

Too Many Stupid People

Gun control is stupid. That’s evident in the fact that not a single one of those highly-touted “gun laws” do ANYTHING to limit the sale and use of guns to those who shouldn’t be allowed near a gun. But they keep making them, in the face of the fact they they not only do nothing to limit gun use by “bad guys,” they make it EASIER for the bad guys to victimize those of us who OBEY their stupid gun laws, whether we like them, or not. “Gun-free zones,” for instance. Each and EVERY “mass shooting” has occurred IN a “gun-free zone.” Stories of robberies and murders happening in gun-free zones are numerous. criminals freely admit that they SEEK OUT gun-free zones because they can be pretty sure none of the law-abiding people there will be armed, and able to oppose them on an equal basis. Background checks would be a good thing...IF criminals ever stood for them. They don’t, for the most part. They either buy their guns from other criminals in a back alley somewhere, or they just STEAL them. Safe storage of guns simply makes it impossible for the law-abiding to get their gun into action fast enough to oppose a criminal, who already has his illegal gun in his hand, ready to use. Every other anti-gun law is just as “short-sighted,” in that none of them work. Politicians who think all you have to do is make a law against guns to eliminate “gun crime,” are STUPID. But like “Whack-A-Mole,” new ones keep popping up, every time we do away with one. (Just common sense)

"Nobody's Above the Law"

That’s a favorite saying by the Dumocrats, but they only seem to apply to the Republicans, and specifically to President Trump. They talk a lot about Trump’s “unlawful behavior,” but they don’t seem to be able to say what “unlawful behavior.” Because they aren’t. The only “crimes” they cite are simple disagreements with Dumocrats. At the same time, many Dumocrat politicians HAVE behaved unlawfully, but “the fix is in,” and the liberals in the government have found excuses NOT to call them to account. They couldn’t find anything to prove the “Russian collusion” scam, but they’re still citing it. Meanwhile, Hillary Clinton, among her many crimes, actually DID “collude with the Russians” in her efforts to get elected president, whatever she had to do, legal or illegal. And the liberal politicians ignore it. In the “e-mail scandal,” then FBI Director Comey actually LISTED all the crimes she had committed, and then said that, since “she didn’t mean it,” he would not recommend charges against her. I didn’t know “didn’t mean it” was an adequate defense against prosecution. He stated that publicly, even though he did not have the authority to refuse to charge her. That is up to the Attorney General, who “rubber stamped” his opinion and refused to charge her. he list of Dumocrats guilty of crimes is long, and I’m still waiting for them to be charged. I will probably be dead before it happens. Biden is just one of the latest, and he will probably die of old age before any charges are brought against him, although we have him in a recording pressuring a foreign government to fire a prosecutor who had investigated his sons’ crimes in the Ukraine, using a billion dollar quid pro quo.. (GovTrackUS)

Ilhan Omar Is Ignorant!

How such an ignorant woman ever got to be a member of Congress is beyond me. Maybe her constituents are just stupid. I don’t know. Maybe it’s that she comes from a district that is heavily Muslim, and, as an extremist Muslim, she’s beginning the process of usurping this government from within, as has been admitted, by Islamic terrorists to be their way of winning what they could not win by military action. Being from a heavily Muslim district, they would easily elect her BECAUSE she is a Muslim. This is not a “knock” on Muslims, per se. It is a knock on anybody who can’t see the scheme that she is a part of. She has shown herself to be an “enemy of America” many times, by her ignorant pronouncements. She has been a “thorn in the side” of the Dumocrats from the minute she appeared in Washington, as has that other Muslim member of Congress, Rashida Tlaib, and that socialist non-Muslim, AOC. All three of them are ignorant, regardless of their religion. Omar says “It’s un-American for ICE to detain illegal aliens” (She calls them something else). Funny how a maker of our laws says ENFORCING our laws is an-American. If that’s not ignorant, I don’t know what is. (Breitbart)

Howzit Possible?

There was a mass shooting the other day, in RUSSIA! How in the hell did that happen? Russia long ago banned guns for its citizens (for the most part). So this should be an impossibility there, right? Russian “officials” are having a hard time explaining this away, after the gunman killed 17 people and wounded 40 others. They first told us it was an “explosion.” Then a terrorist attack. Then FINALLY, the truth came out that it was a STUDENT, who somehow got a gun, and killed a bunch of people. That was after they got so screwed up in their phony “explanations” that the local “officials” announced it was a shooting at the same time Putrid… er, uh, Putin was telling them is was an explosion. The shooter then killed himself after the attack was over. All this brings up (again) the question of how effective are anti-gun laws in keeping guns out of the hands of those who shouldn’t have them. I think that’s a faulty way of going about it. You are NEVER going to be able to keep those who wish to do ill from getting the tools they need to do it. The ONLY sure way is to allow the law-abiding to be armed for self defense, so there is a great possibility that there will be someone there the shooter doesn’t know about, who can kill him/her before he/she can carry out his/her wishes to kill a bunch of innocents. The law-abiding are not likely to “go nuts” and shoot up the place, as the anti-gun fools confidently assure us. (Legal Insurrection)

Hits Close to Home

The liberal media chooses not to cover former VP Biden’s response to a question about his son’s dealings in the Ukraine because they know Biden has no real answer to questions about that fiasco, where Biden, as VP, told them to fire a certain prosecutor or lose a lot of money. Money which he could control. There is actually a video of him saying that, out loud. Guess what? That prosecutor got fired. Surprise, surprise! Meanwhile, he’s crying about the “possibility” of President Trump having the gall to ask the Ukraine to investigate the activities of Biden’s son in the Ukraine. He popped off at the reporter who asked the question and changed the subject to insisting the most investigated politician in history “needs to be investigated.” What they bloody hell does he think has been happening for the last three years? You may notice he never answered that reporter’s question. He merely deflected the question by going on yet another rant against Trump. I think Biden is a “dead issue” in the 2020 presidential race. He doesn’t realize it yet, but it is a “done thing.” Biden will go home with his tail between his legs, like people thought Hillary was going to do—and which she will be forced to do eventually, when the rest of the Dumocrats realize she is an “empty suit” with a big mouth, and is doing them damage. (National Review)

"Shouting Her Down"

A precocious 13-year-old girl stood up and told the Raleigh, NC City Council something they should hear, and those against what she was supporting shouted her down. What she supported is “pro-life.” One of the very moving parts of her speech was when she told those assembled that a child, being aborted while on an ultra sound “shied away” from the instruments that were killing it. That its mouth was open wide, obviously screaming as it felt the PAIN of the abortion. Apparently, that was too much for the baby-killers in the audience, and they screamed insults and some of the nastiest words I’ve ever heard; words a pretty young girl should never have to hear. One cop even had to remove one insulting woman who tried to take a camera away from a man filming the proceedings, and gave him the finger. Apparently, they just don’t think people who oppose their ideas have the right to speak, at whatever age—unless that child supports things they also support, like gun control. The mayor pro tem shut them up, reminding them that all persons have the right to speak their minds, even if they are a little young. Especially if they have a reasoned message. (Conservative Tribune)

"Just Lie About It!"

Dumocrat Sen. Claire McCaskill is an anti-gun fool. But does she tell her voters? Of course not! They’d never re-elect her if they knew. She has spent the last 12 years supporting anti-gun measures, but she continues to tell her constituents she is pro-gun. She says, “They can’t know.” And you can bet there are other politicians that hide their anti-gun stance when campaigning for office. Then, when nobody’s looking (they think) they push every misguided anti-gun measure that comes down the pike. That’s how we get so many anti-gun fools in office. They lie about it, and work hard to keep us from knowing. Until they get elected. They claim that all they’re doing is “working for gun safety.” But their idea of “gun safety” is nobody, except for “government agents and cops” have guns—legally. Those politicians who work so hard to disarm the populace have ulterior motives in disarming us. They plan to later come to take what is ours, and they don’t want to face a gun in the hands of the owners of that money or property, as they did recently, out west, where they tried to take over a ranch, claiming unpaid “graze fees,” and even KILLING one of the ranch owners. Meanwhile criminals routinely ignore their useless laws and get their guns illegally, either buying them from other criminals, or just stealing them. While the law-abiding remain unarmed, and are “easy targets.” (Missouri Firearms Coalition)

"California Hates Trump"

That’s the narrative, and what California politicians like their governor think. Then why was President Trump able to come to California and “troll them” while raising $15 million dollars from its citizens? Maybe they don’t hate him as much as the liberal politicians there think they do. That’s the big problem with liberals. They steal so many elections locally they think they’re in the majority everywhere. They refuse to believe it when they find out otherwise. Rush Limbaugh made some good suggestions: “I think Trump ought to start going to California. I think he ought to go there once a month. I think the Republican National Committee ought to schedule a debate in California,” Limbaugh said on his radio show. “I think the campaign should have ads showing and highlighting the homelessness in downtown Los Angeles and pointing out that this is what happens when Democrats run things with no opposition, no checks, no balances.” Maybe he won’t go there once a month, but he’s doing almost all the other things Limbaugh suggested, and is making the liberal California politicians barf in their Wheaties. A lot of people think he will win re-election without California. I think he’s going to take that state easily because most of the population there loves him though they won’t say it because they don’t want some loony liberal to punch them in the face. They just give him their money to contribute to an expected 50-state majority. (Legal Insurrection)

Destroying the Coal Industry

As if spending millions (maybe billions) to make all law-abiding Americans defenseless against the millions of illegal guns out there wasn’t enough, Obama wanted to target the coal industry. Like most liberal Dumocrats, he wanted to do all he could to make life more difficult for all Americans. Never mind the many good things coal does for this country; all the jobs that will be lost if he succeeds. Forget the fact that coal is the base on which many industries sit, including the power industry. Without coal, there will be no electricity, and do you want that? Do you want to go back 100 years and live in log cabins, using candles for enough light to read by at night, no television, no Internet, no cell phones, no cars, having to “hitch up” the horse before you can go anywhere? He wants to kill the coal industry and replace it with that failed “windmill” industry that has proven itself INCAPABLE of producing enough power to meet our needs. Never mind his plans will cause devastation to employees in many industries, not only coal jobs lost, but jobs lost in other industries dependent on coal. Bloomberg is, like most liberals, short-sighted. He actually believes that global warming/climate change crap, and is willing to put his money where his mouth is, even if it destroys society. (Daily Caller)

"More Likely To Be Shot"

A recent “study” showed that if you lived in states with looser gun laws, you were more likely to be shot by the cops. “The study, from researchers at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health and Northeastern University found that people were 3.6 times more likely to be involved in fatal police shootings if they lived in the 10 states with the most guns — Alaska, Georgia, Idaho, Kentucky, Louisiana, Missouri, Montana, Oklahoma, South Carolina and West Virginia — than if they lived in the five states with the least — Connecticut, Hawaii, Massachusetts, New Jersey and New York.” I’d say, “Not if you don’t try and commit a crime with your gun, or point it at a cop.” Pointing a gun at a cop, whether it’s legal or illegal, is a death sentence. I don’t know where these fools get their figures, but at a guess I’d say they make them up, to prove their point—which is to disarm all Americans and make them “easy targets” for those who routinely IGNORE their fool laws. If you look into the people who do these “studies,” you will find they all are anti-gun fools, and their “studies” always tend to “prove their point.” (ABC)

They'e At It Again!

Dumocrats have dredged up an old, then discredited accusation of sex abuse against Supreme Court Justice Kavanaugh in yet another attempt to get him off the Court, so they can “have their way” with this country. One thing about the Dumocrats: they never give up. If something doesn’t work, they do it again and again, hoping for a different result. Wait a minute; isn’t that the very DEFINITION pf insanity? This is such an old con we’re getting tired of it. Accuse somebody of sexual attack without any kind of proof, treat it as if the accusation proves it’s true, and “run with it.” The very way they treat ANY accusation of sexual misconduct lends itself to this kind of abuse. All a woman has to do is ACCUSE somebody of sexual impropriety and that, alone, creates an atmosphere of guilt. They even sometimes hide the identity of the accuser so the accused can’t even confront his accuser, as in all other kinds of accusations. Such accusations can forever ruin a man’s life, even without proof. In this case, even they accuser is not talking! She can’t even REMEMBER it happening! (Legal Insurrection)

Democrats Slam Trump

Of course. If President Trump walked on water, they’d slam him for “disturbing the flow.” This time they’re slamming him for actually making a deal with Mexico to stop the “runaway immigration (invasion) on our border.” Something other presidents have tried, and failed to do. This is just more of him actually DOING what he says he will do, when others either couldn’t, or didn’t bother. The liberal media will predictably either slam him, or ignore his accomplishment. But that’s the way the Dumocrats (and other liberals) handle it when Trump “whips them” again. Ignore it, or find something they can criticize. But history will recognize the fact that Trump is the best president we’ve ever had, probably after he’s long dead. But wiser heads will one day prevail over the petty, subversive Dumocrats, who only want to “get rid of him,” no matter how many accomplishments he has. Each one of his stupendous accomplishments are, to them, a defeat. They will still try to impeach him, and if (when) they fail at that, they will try, after he is out of office, to put him in prison. “Nervous Nancy” has inadvertently revealed that plan. (CNBC)

"Everybody I know"

Gabby Giffords (a well-known anti-gun fool) asked a bunch of kids from the West side of Chicago, where there are some of the toughest anti-gun laws known to man, if they knew anybody who had been shot, she said every child raised their hands. What she didn’t ask is, “How many of the guns used in these shootings were legally-owned?” That’s a question never asked in such cases, and these fools “cherry-pick” the areas in which they ask such silly questions to get such answers. If you ask those questions in most areas you’ll get a very different answer. The point here is that ALL their highly touted “gun laws” are in effect in Chicago, but the number of gun deaths and injuries remains high. Why? First of all, the kind of people who regularly use a gun to settle an argument are not the kind of people who OBEY gun laws, or ANY kind of laws, for that matter. This is something they NEVER admit in their quest to make all Americans DEFENSELESS against such people. Every law they make, makes it easier for those law breakers to victimize those of us who OBEY their stupid laws. But they never admit that. They just want to disarm us, making us “sitting ducks” for those who ignore their silly laws. (San Diego Union-Tribune)

Penis In Your Hand

One would think a woman (then a young girl) would remember if somebody at a drunken frat party thrust a penis into her hand. But then when the Dumocrats set out to ruin somebody, logic doesn’t matter. False sex attacks are “the usual thing” Dumocrats use when trying to ruin somebody. They’ve tried it several times with Kavanaugh, and they tried it with President Trump. They’ve tried it with many More. It’s the “go to scam” they use when they’re desperate, and can’t come up with anything else to use in destroying people they don’t like. I guess it really happens often enough that it just MIGHT be true, and that’s what they count on. Couple that with the way they treat sexual misconduct allegations from women—they require NO PROOF whatsoever, and won’t even reveal the name of the accuser in most cases. Her unsupported word, or the unsupported word of somebody else is enough to ruin a man, just because they were ACCUSED. I, myself, was once so accused when I worked at Avis. The very accusations were so absurd they weren’t followed up, and nothing came of them. But I was not allowed to know WHO the accusers were, and the accusations themselves required I be questioned about it. (Just common sense)

Not About Women's Rights!

Dumocrats love to equate murdering defenseless infants for the “convenience” of the parents with “a woman’s right to choose what happens to her own body.” But it is NOT about that. If it were, prostitution would be legal. It is about that helpless infant’s right to stay alive, in spite of parents who want to murder it so they won’t have to be bothered to raise it for 18 years. That crap about “women’s rights” is just a smoke screen to cover up their wish to kill their child. The fact is, the whole abortion question is about whether or not a parent can have her child MURDERED without suffering the consequences of murder. Yes, there are cases where abortion is proper. Such as to save the life of the mother. But it should NEVER be considered for the CONVENIENCE of the parent. And that’s what abortion on demand is: murder for the convenience of the murderer. They can screen it as being about women’s rights all they want, but it is still murder. It KILLS a child. They can call that child a “nonviable mass” all they like, but it is a human being they are murdering. Maybe an unknown Einstein who can change the world. But we’ll never know, will we? (Just common sense)

"Gun Nuts Are Terrorists"

That’s what one (Dumocrat, of course) anti-gun fool in Tennessee says, anyway. They call us “gun nuts” for insisting on our constitutional rights. He’s referring to those of us who wish to retain the constitutional RIGHT to own and use a gun for self defense, against those who IGNORE all their short-sighted laws that only make life easier for criminals to victimize the law-abiding. He says nothing about those who routinely IGNORE their silly laws and get their guns ILLEGALLY. Those are the ones who are closer to being “terrorists,” not the law-abiding, who OBEY their stupid laws. This wildly “out there” politician is trying to paint himself as a “moderate,” something that most Dumocrats do, and then they work to pass some of the most extreme laws ever while still claiming to be “moderate.” And they think we believe that crap. The language used by the writer in this article is unfortunate, so be forewarned. The amazing thing to me is that this candidate is trying to present himself as a “pro-gun candidate,” using an OUTDATED former NRA rating in his campaign. The NRA is demanding he get rid of the ads claiming NRA support. (Washington Free Beacon)

Swamp Sits In Judgment

It really pains me to see the “swamp members” President Trump has pledged to “drain” sitting in judgment on his people, pretending they are “enforcing the law,” as if they were some kind of law-enforcers, when they are the criminals President Trump promised to “drain.” It’s actually funny to see Jerry Nadler, he of the pants belted around his shoulders, sitting on his “throne,” as if he weren’t one of the biggest crooks in DC. It’s like a Western, where the hero goes into the bar to get the criminal, only to find him sitting their wearing a sheriff’s badge, running their “court.” Now they’re putting Cory Lewandowsky through the wringer, pretending he did something wrong, and that they can find something they can pin on President /trump. The attempted coup continues on. And that’s what it is. An attempted coup designed to remove a legally elected president from office on false claims. They’ve tried everything; from the phony “Russian collusion” scam to the phony sex crimes accusations on Supreme Court Justice Kavanaugh, and it hasn’t worked.  Since that didn’t work, and Kavanaugh was confirmed, they’re now bringing new “charges,” based on a false New York Times article, since withdrawn when it was found that the supposed victim could not remember such a thing happening, yet liberal fools are still demanding Kavanaugh “step down” because THEY SAY “It’s clear he lied before the committee,” when it’s more clear he DID NOT. You'd think a young girl would remember somebody putting a penis in her hand, wouldn't you?  (Business Insider)

All the Criminals Assembled

This editorial cartoon has identifiable images of almost all the main criminals in DC assembled, all calling for the impeachment of the one honest man in the equation. Except for the ones working behind the scenes to “get Trump” before he gets them. That’s what I’ve always liked about editorial cartoons. The reduce things to understandable principles, whichever side they’re on. (Gary Varvel)

"Unlicensed Gun Dealer"

It really amazes me the way politicians “dance around” to keep from calling something what it is. In this case they call the CRIMINAL who sold the gun that killed a cop an “unlicensed gun dealer.” One of the guns he sold was a Glock 26 9 mm handgun, that ended up in the hands of a four-time felon who used it in February to kill Chicago police Cmdr. Paul Bauer in a shocking daylight shooting in the heart of the Loop, according to recently filed federal documents. It’s the same thing when they insist we call an “illegal alien” an “undocumented immigrant,” thus DEcriminalizing (they hope) the crime that illegal alien committed in entering this country illegally. Of course, the Chicago cops emphasized the fact that the gun used in killing this cop “came from out of state.” Forget that ALL guns, legal or illegal, “come from out of state” unless the manufacturer is IN that state. It’s a “fact without significance.” They talk about “how easy and lucrative” illegal gun sales can be, while masking the action with that “good sounding” phrase, “unlicensed gun dealer.” They refuse to see that NONE of their anti-gun fool laws touch this criminal because they only seem to apply to the law-abiding. This criminal was under their view, but he succeeded in selling this gun to a felon, anyway. (Chicago Tribune)