Friday, December 6, 2013

Presidential Incompetence?

Or presidential collusion? It has to be one or the other. I’m not one of those people who think Bush was complicit in the deaths of 3,000 innocent people at the World Trade Center in September, 2001. That was a stretch, from the beginning. I have my own problems with George Bush, but I don’t think he was that kind of a guy. Obama, on the other hand, was “running guns” to the Syrian rebels and the now dead ambassador in Benghazi knew it and was protesting. Now that he’s dead, there is a lot less talk about it. Obama is already known for his “gun-running” to the Mexican drug cartels, and that’ too, has never been properly investigated, along with the murders of our embassy people in Benghazi. There are several nasty scandals against Obama, including several deaths, and progress has been made on NONE of them. This tells me a lot about Obama. I figure we’ll never know the truth until Obama and his friends are no longer in control of the investigation process. (Just common sense)

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

Can't wait for all the tell-all books. Too bad we have no representatives with a pair to take obama down with his own past and his sealed records as well.

Ray Thomas said...

Anon: Tell-All Books only let you know how badly you've been screwed. They don't stop the screwing.